Slashdot Mirror


Force Field. No, Really

tqft points out news of "a working force field, using plasma. Now to scale the sucker up." Here's the Brookhaven press release. I can think of so many uses for this.

79 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. An enormous breakthrough for parents by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a solution to the "Dad, he keeps touching me!" dilemma.

    1. Re:An enormous breakthrough for parents by CptChipJew · · Score: 5, Funny

      The one problem though, is that this device runs at about 15,000 Kelvin.

      Wait, now that I think about it, that would really teach those damn kids to stop messing around.

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    2. Re:An enormous breakthrough for parents by indros · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also probably a good first line of defense as birth control as well. Make sure the swimmers don't reach their destination!

    3. Re:An enormous breakthrough for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The one problem though, is that this device runs at about 15,000 Kelvin.

      Bah, that's only 14,727 degrees Celsius.

  2. I've already seen a working force field by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a guy down the street from me who was in a force field. Can't remember his name but he had a black and white striped shirt, white face paint and he didn't speak that much.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:I've already seen a working force field by Amarok.Org · · Score: 2, Funny
      do I get a prize for guessing correctly?

      No, but you get a prize for being an idiot and driving the joke completely into the ground.

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    2. Re:I've already seen a working force field by MaestroSartori · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, he was keeping quiet about it until the patent came through...

    3. Re:I've already seen a working force field by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be very careful - this sounds like a French spy who's been trapped successfully. Sometimes they try to escape by climbing a rope, so be sure that field has a lid to it...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:I've already seen a working force field by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...he had a black and white striped shirt, white face paint and he didn't speak that much.

      Easily breached using the proper Force-Field Deactivation Device.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:I've already seen a working force field by BrynM · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sometimes they try to escape by climbing a rope
      But every time they escape, we just push them back in with a strong spray of air. It seems they can't run ageanst wind very well.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  3. Now what I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    are some borg implants so I can walk through the force field unaffected.

  4. Uses? by Surak · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can think of so many uses for this.

    Like keeping PHBs out of the server room? ;)

    1. Re:Uses? by Smallphish · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just what I need in my server room. Another heat source at 15,000 Kelvin. . .

  5. am i reading this wrong by Neophytus · · Score: 3, Funny

    or is all its blocking at the moment air? then again 14k kelvin might keep us out.

    1. Re:am i reading this wrong by 26199 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes...

      But if it's blocking against atmospheric pressure (not quite sure on that one) then it's an impressive feat...

    2. Re:am i reading this wrong by zackbar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really much pressure though.

      I think it's mostly blocking stray molecules of air that get in from leaks until the leaks can be patched.

    3. Re:am i reading this wrong by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's not really blocking "pressure" it's making it worth every molecule's while to go the other way. Think of it like a Rent-A-Cop with a velvet rope. Neither the velvet rope nor the Rent-A-Cop would stop a raging mob of 100 people walking straight into it.

      But, the Rent-A-Cop and his/her rope will "kindly" deflect any stray party goers that encounter it. Since you are repelling individual particles at a time, the physics are much different.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:am i reading this wrong by SkArcher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if it is not yet blocking against atmospheric pressures, it is a design that one would hope to see some development work done on.

      If it can be used to block a 1 atmosphere pressure (or even above) it would solve a whole bucket load of problems.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    5. Re:am i reading this wrong by Open_The_Box · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's an enclosed plasma that can block anything then it's pretty darn impressive, lets be honest. ;) The atmospheric pressure thing will depend on the exact physical set up though. But having worked with vacuum equipment I'd estimate that with vacuum on one side and air leaking in on the other you're really talking about how much air is leaking into the gap. i.e.:

      leak in system plasma wall
      | |
      | enclosed |
      atmos area at | vacuum
      | atmos - x |
      | |

      Obviously with this set up the amount of air leaking in will increase with time (albeit possibly slowly) until x=atmospheric pressure. I certainly wouldn't want to trust my delicate equipment inside the vacumm to anything that wouldn't hold back the full pressure of the air outside.

      Of course I'm only guessing since there're no numbers or anything in the article but it is a great achievement anyway.

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
  6. Protect your *nix by Tukz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally a decent way to protect your *nix server
    from physical contact!

    Yipee!

    *snicker*

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    1. Re:Protect your *nix by urrbanlleg-end · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use an AMD CPU in your server, that should generate enough heat to drive this thing...

  7. Blast... by foxtrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I asked the guy how he did it, but he won't tell me.

    Hasn't anyone explained to him the wonders of open force?

    -JDF

  8. Torps by izto · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but can it stop plasma torps? what about phasers?? :-)

  9. Force fields have existed for ages by fredrikj · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Force fields have existed for ages by CatKnight · · Score: 2, Funny

      "In the olden days, electricity and magnetism were counted as two separate forces (for a total of five), until it was discovered they were two aspects of the same thing (still charges and moving charges), and could be described mathematically in one theory, namely Maxwell's equations. Particle theorists have since combined the weak force with electromagnetism into a single theory called electroweak, so if you count that way there are three forces. Of course, particle theorists are gung-ho about combining all the forces into one huge Grand Unification Theory, which will give us just one force."

      Hmm, integrating all of the fundamental forces of the universe into one neat package? Aren't there supposed to be anti-trust laws to prevent this? Bill Gates must be jealous as hell.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end for lack of stones, and when the oil age ends it will not be for lack of oil. --Bjorn Lomberg
  10. The Brookhaven Press Release by Adam+Rightmann · · Score: 2, Informative
    Good people, I have copied the Brookhave Press Release below, in case of Slashdotting of the server, of just in case you with to save our goverment a few nickels in bandwidth cost, nickels that might be better used to spread freedom, and democracy throughout the world.

    Brookhaven Lab and Argonne Lab Scientists Invent a Plasma Valve

    UPTON, NY â" Scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory have received U.S. patent number 6,528,948 for a device that shuts off airflow into a vacuum about one million times faster than mechanical valves or shutters that are currently in use. The new device, called a plasma valve, was developed through research funded by DOEâ(TM)s Office of Basic Energy Sciences in the Office of Science.

    In synchrotron light sources, other particle accelerators, and various other scientific instruments, where plasma valves can be put to use, a vacuum allows very high-energy electron beams to circulate in rings for hours. These electron beams interact with magnetic fields to generate x-rays, ultraviolet light, and other forms of radiation that travel unimpeded through beam lines used for experiments. When the vacuum is breached, air moves in with great force, the electron beam loses confinement, and its energy is deposited on vacuum walls. The faster the breach can be contained, the less damage there will be to the ring, beam lines, and the experiments that use those beam lines.

    The need for a fast valve at Argonneâ(TM)s Advanced Photon Source led Argonne engineers to explore the potential use of plasma arcs previously developed for electron welding guns. The Argonne team â" Sushil Sharma, John Noonan, Elbio Rotela, and Ali Khounsary â" joined Ady Hershcovitch from Brookhaven to develop the plasma valve.

    Hershcovitch explained the advantages of the plasma valve: "Unlike traditional valves, a plasma valve has no moving parts, does not require much maintenance, and establishes a vacuum-air separation much faster. Also, it is completely nondestructive. In contrast, existing ultra-fast valves and shutters can cause damage to machinery when triggered."

    When activated, the plasma valve is composed of an ionized gas, or a gas with charged particles confined by electric and magnetic fields, that fills an airtight aperture. When the plasma reaches certain temperature and density parameters, it separates atmospheric pressure from a vacuum, which must be devoid of pressure.

    When a vacuum is breached, a plasma arc is ignited in less than one nanosecond inside the plasma valve. The valve's outer structure is comprised of a hollow, water-cooled copper cylinder located between three cathodes and a hollow anode ring at the opposite end of the cylinder.

    At 15,000 degrees Celsius (27,032 degrees Fahrenheit), the plasma valve is about 50 times hotter than room temperature when measured in degrees Kelvin. This intense heat makes the ionized atoms and molecules move around and collide with air molecules so rapidly that the ions block any air molecules that might pass through the plasma valve.

    Researchers from around the world study a wide variety of materials at light sources such as the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne and the National Synchrotron Light Source at

    Brookhaven. For example, they use their bright beams of light to examine the minute details of computer chips to make more efficient computers, decipher the structures of viruses to work on developing new pharmaceuticals, investigate magnetic materials to make better recording devices, and study corrosion to develop new methods for its prevention.

    --
    A. Rightmann
  11. Spam? by 955301 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They use the word plasma so many times in the last sentence of the first link, that for some strange reason (closely related to my sense of humor, I'm sure), I'm reminded of Monty Python and Spam:

    A much faster, more complex version of a previously introduced "spam window" (see New Scientist, 12 April 2003), the spam valve is the latest example of novel uses of spam for particle-beam applications; other recent ones include spam acceleration of antimatter (Update 634), a spam lens (Update 508), and spam deflection of high-energy beams (Update 540).

    Niiieeeeeeeeeeeeee!

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  12. Re:Strange Room Temperature by BabyDave · · Score: 3, Informative

    Room temperature is around 290 Kelvin (about 25 degrees Celsius, or 77 Fahrenheit). Remember, 0 Kelvin is absolute zero - -273.something degrees C.

  13. Re:Strange Room Temperature by BlueTooth · · Score: 4, Informative

    15,000 / 50 = 300 kelvin

    300 kelvin = 26.85 C = 80.33 F
    [Temperature Conversion Page]

    So, about 50 times room temp.

    --
    SPAM
  14. Re:Strange Room Temperature by aug24 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Huh?

    15,000 over 50 is 300.

    300 Kelvin is about 26 Celcius, 80 Fahrenheit.

    Does that help?

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  15. Re:Strange Room Temperature by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not as bad as you think - 300K = 27C = about 77F.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  16. The article sucks. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the idea, and the science around it, but the article sucks! No pics, diagrams or any actual detail on the way the thing works. I'm sick of this kind of 'it works because of herbs!' reporting; it's way too simple for any inquiring mind and because of that it's non-informative.

    A shame, 'cause I'd be interested in the practical implementation of this valve system. And I want pretty movies and/or pictures, of course :)

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  17. Plasma jargon by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Informative

    To keep all of the vampires and blood drive workers* from getting too anxious, the plasma this article refers to is not a component of blood (medical jargon). This other plasma (physics jargon) is matter that has been charged with so much energy it begins exhibiting characteristics of a liquid rather than a gas.

    *After seeing some of the workers running our corporate guilt-a-thon, I suspect this may be redundant.

    1. Re:Plasma jargon by Celandine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing to do with exhibiting characteristics of a liquid: the defining feature of a plasma is that it's hot enough to be substantially ionized (i.e. a significant fraction of the electrons are freed from their parent atoms).

  18. What this could be used for by 1stflight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since this does a great job at separating air, and a vacuum, this has great applications in space.
    Think launch bays that really can be opened up to have a shuttle pass though, and leave the air inside the bay intact.
    Yes, this idea has a lot of promise.

  19. Re:Strange Room Temperature by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Silly Americans... still converting to Fahrenheit. ;)

  20. RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Funny
    1) It's a "plasma valve". Not a force (ie magnetic or something ethereal), the magnetic "force" confines the plasma.

    2) The plasma valve is INSIDE a copper container.

    If you think this is a "force field" then you might also be interested in the "ray gun" in your television tube.

    An interesting story nonetheless, spoiled only by the fatuous ignorance of the submitter and editor.

    1. Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's a "plasma valve". Not a force...

      Erm. I dunno. For a lot of laypeople, a valve with no 'solid' parts fits the definition of a 'force field'.

      (Note: I am embarrassed to use the following example.) Take the brig on Star Trek: TNG era vessels. There is a ring of emitters surrounding the door opening. These emitters are presumably responsible for maintaining an impenetrable field in the doorway. That 'force field' seems to be at least loosely similar (in form and stated goals) to the 'plasma valve' described--it's just larger.

      Oh, and the plasma valve would take your finger off if you touched it. Oh well. This is real life that we're stuck with, after all.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does the field still prohibit any natural force acting upon it to move through or damage it? If so, then it's effective a force field... and it would seem that it does, given that it can hold back air from a vacuum (which qualifies as a "force"). Nobody cares about the technical definition of the terms "force field" or "plasma field". They care about whether they could make a door that sound won't pass through (2 of these fields with a vacuum in the middle) but you could see through and walk through (given that 15000 degrees Kelvin wouldn't harm you... read the rest of the comments by people far more knowledgable than I in matters of physics).

      Here's my question: Does it have to be completely surrounded by some kind of magnetic/copper thingamabob (too lazy to look it up right now)? By "completely surrounded", I mean X, Y, and Z Axis? Or, is it only necessary to surround it on 2 dimensions, X and Y? If only 2 dimensions are necessary, then the applications for this are almost too numerous to mention. Sound-proof walls, doors, windows (that never open or shut... rather just turn off), Star Trekie type inventions, etc. Depending on how cheaply they can reproduce a field, we could be seeing these types of devices practically everywhere. Suddenly I don't think Star Trek is too far fetched...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    3. Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Depending on how cheaply they can reproduce a field, we could be seeing these types of devices practically everywhere. Suddenly I don't think Star Trek is too far fetched...

      Well, even though they didn't provide pictures, I imagine that the area in which the plasma actually resides is not very big. It may not be too difficult to produce a plasma curtain to block off a 1-2 cm^2 entry point into a particle accelerator, but I wager it would be very difficult to produce the same effect uniformly over a 1 m^2 door opening. I don't know much about plasma physics, but I have a suspicion that a big honkin' 1m^2 sheet of plasma isn't going to be magically stable.

      I think the Star Trek force fields are still a long, long way off, if they're even possible at all.
      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    4. Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, and the plasma valve would take your finger off if you touched it. Oh well. This is real life that we're stuck with, after all.

      Well, then what you've got there is a *Klingon* force field. Duh!

    5. Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" by hal200 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oooh! Oooh! Oooh! Integer values for x, y, z that satisfy x^27 + y^27 = z^27? Well I can think of several right off the top of my head...

      x=1
      y=-1
      z=0

      or

      x=0
      y=1
      z=1

      Or did you want a non-trivial answer for that?

      [FLAME ON]
      Now, in the words of Dennis Miller, "I don't mean to get off on a rant", but speaking as a Math/Comp Sci. geek, I hate it when people attempt to sound intelligent by frobbing their mighty mathematical muscles. Most people wouldn't know (or care) what the integral of e^(-x^2) is, nor for that matter what you define as "fundamental mathematic expressions" are either.

      That's basically like asking someone for a grenden frenesdhire of lignitious flibidnituriousness. Without the context or the intellectual framework to understand the question, it's meaningless. Do YOU have a grenden frenesdhire of lignitious flibidnituriousness? I thought not.

      As for your example with Andromeda, a pair of rubber bands and a liquid lunch...well, even you state that there is a vanishingly small chance of being solvable. Vanishingly small, but non-zero. Just because we currently do not know how to do it now doesn't mean we never will.

      Remember, at one point in time, many leading scientists believed it was impossible for man to fly, even AFTER Kitty Hawk. The Wright brothers were considered crackpots in their time. Next, it was the sound barrier. "Man will never break the sound barrier", they said. It's been broken. The history of scientific progress is littered with so-called experts saying "It can't be done." and the men who proved it could.
      [FLAME OFF]

      That being said, there ARE classes of problems which are considered unsolvable. Turing's Halting Problem (Note the use of a link providing information for those interested in learning more and/or are not gifted with near-omniscient intellect) is one of them. Alan Turing proved that there is no algorithm which can solve it for any possible inputs. It's a mindbendingly elegant proof...you can see a sketch of it on the other side of the link if you're interested.

      Anyway, sorry for the flame. Your post caught me as being a little too intellectually smug and self-flagellating. Had to be done.

      --

      I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

  21. It's already obsolete by jdfox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because I brought my DINOSAUR! Who EATS force field dogs!

  22. temperature vs. energy by lingqi · · Score: 5, Informative

    i know you are trying to be funny, but realistically, the amount of energy a high-temperature "thing" contains can be a lot less than you think.

    for example, some ions trapped by the earth's magnetic field goes up to some 14 MILLION kelvins (notice it's hotter than anywhere on, around, or inside the sun). However, as there are maybe one or two such high-temperature particles per cubic centimeter, you will still freeze to death standing (erm, floating) in the middle of it.

    just a pedantic monday morning, i guess. I'll stop now.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:temperature vs. energy by KDan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you consider all those high-energy particles trapped in the earth's magnetic field, you can look at their speeds statistically and find out what their speed distribution is. From that, you could probably derive a measure like temperature (assuming they actually follow a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution). However, I agree that that is a pretty useless way to look at things. Temperature is a man-made concept to make a lot of common place things (involving large numbers of particles in thermal equilibrium) easier to understand. It was never designed be applied to exotic things like high-energy particles trapped in magnetic fields. It can be applied to them nevertheless, but won't tell you much.

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    2. Re:temperature vs. energy by Smallphish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are absolutely correct. A very high temperature something does not necessarily have a lot of heat. The heat that is transferred by an object, or a volume of a fluid, depends on the amount of force that the particles in that substance will exert on particles that they come in contact with, and the amount of loss of energy to radiating photons. Even if we ignore ratiating heat transfer, I figured a field such that the previous poster was describing, covering the server room door with enough force to hold back one atmosphere of pressure (to say nothing of PHB's!) would be giving off a large amount of heat by it's very nature. The article describes the field acting by having a plasma confined within an electromagnetic field, with a high enough temperature that when errant air molecules come in contact with ions screaming along at 15,000 Kelvins, they're *smacked* back in the direction that they came from. this would impart a lot of force on the air molecule, speed it up and increase its temperature. Now, if you're pumping enough energy into this plasma to keep enough of these collisions going on all at once to hold back an atmosphere pressure of gas over an entire doorway (approx. 44,452.8 pounds of pressure) that would, in my armchair analysis, be enough to transfer a significant amount of heat into the room.

      But then again, maybe it would only impart as much as a door :-)

      No, that's bullshit because the door molecules are very low energy and the plasma ions are very high energy. More energy transfer = more entropy = more heat.

  23. Re:Strange Room Temperature by mothrathegreat · · Score: 2, Funny
    I think he probably got the general message after the first 10 people told him he is crap at maths ;)

    --
    Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
  24. It's not "degrees Kelvin"!! by arvindn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the plasma reaches a temperature of 15,000 degrees Kelvin

    First, its degrees only when it is Fahrenheit or Centigrade, which are not absolute units. Second, its Kelvins, damn it! (at least when it is more than 1K). People have no problem with Joules, Newtons, Pascals etc which are all people's names, why is Kelvins so different??

    [I haven't done any physics after high school, so if I'm wrong correct me.]

    1. Re:It's not "degrees Kelvin"!! by KDan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did a physics masters and I never heard anyone declare that you can't say "degrees Kelvin". In fact, I must have said it myself quite a few times. Both ways of saying it are acceptable as far as I'm aware.

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    2. Re:It's not "degrees Kelvin"!! by stoops · · Score: 2, Funny

      you sure it's not "degrees Kelvin"?

      i don't know about you, but when someone asks me my height and weight i always say "130 weight units pound" and "70 height units inch".

  25. Not a Star Trek Style Force Field by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This thing is for use in sci-tech research only, for creating air tight vacums. It can't be used to protect / encase eevryday objects. For example, I quote:

    At 15,000 degrees Celsius (27,032 degrees Fahrenheit), the plasma valve is about 50 times hotter than room temperature when measured in degrees Kelvin. This intense heat makes the ionized atoms and molecules move around and collide with air molecules so rapidly that the ions block any air molecules that might pass through the plasma valve.

    In short, don't expect this force field to be in use at your neighborhood brig / jail anytime soon :) A really cool advancement though.

  26. Harping on the temperature thing one more time by Cappy+Red · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At 15,000 degrees Celsius (27,032 degrees Fahrenheit), the plasma valve is about 50 times hotter than room temperature when measured in degrees Kelvin.

    I want to say something about this, but the sentence makes my brain hurt, and not in a good way.

    So... converting temperatures to Kelvin makes them lower? It may be that I'm too far removed from my math and science classes, but... well, come to think of it, I never learned it that way.

    Sheesh, they didn't even say "in Kelvins." "Degrees Kelvin" indeed... amateurs...


    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  27. Re:Dont try this at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you tried this in say a jail cell, you would fairly quickly cook the occupant. ... if the occupant touched the field, his finger would cease to exist...

    Still, i'll take the plasma field over the 6'5" grinning black man with the jar of vaseline in his left hand and 10" in his right.

  28. It's a BULLETIN by devphil · · Score: 4, Informative


    It's supposed to be short. That's the whole point of the online AIP: short summaries of articles.

    Why the poster linked to it instead of to a full published article, I don't know. Perhaps a full published writeup hasn't been made yet. Perhaps the poster thought that short sound bites are all that the /. crowd has attention for.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  29. Re:15,000 kelvins are 50 times room temp? by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 2, Informative

    um 300 * 50 =15,000 not 1500

    S

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  30. my stupid idea by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you could make a huge-scale forcefield that wouldn't repel matter but allow it to rest on it you could make ... TRANSPARENT AIRCRAFT!

    The military would probably be interested, but I'm more into the idea of see-through 747s- just think of the view!

    I suppose you'd still have to have most of the aircraft solid, unless force fields can act as wings etc for aerodynamic purposes (IANAP), but you'd still end up with the equivalent of glass-bottomed boats, except far cooler.

    graspee

  31. Re:Some cool benefits by bwohlgemuth · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Flamebait .sig for sale, low mileage, one owner only.
    Serious inquiries only.
  32. SCI FI wonderland by Darkseer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Brookhaven National Labs is awsome man. I interned there one summer and forcefields are the least of their toys. The place is out in the middle of Long Island NY and looks almost totally harmless from the outside. Inside they have all the latest and greatest science tools, everything from nuclear reactors to partical accelators. 10 Years ago they figured out how to do 3D medical imaging like you see in science fiction movies and methods to do surgury with radiation beams. If your ever out that way sign up for the tour, its enlightening.

    --

    BOFH, My model for being a sysadmin :)

  33. Temperature != Heat by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Remember folks, temperature is not the same thing as heat. 15,000 Kelvin that's a few molecule's thick won't damage your finger. The thermal mass of your finger would snuff it out lickety split.

    Now, the high voltage shock might give you pause before touching it again though...

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  34. What's next? by BobRooney · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suppose next we'll be hearing about a new sort of sci-fi device called a "laser". Perhaps this "laser" can be used with the "force field" to sculpt pictures of world leaders onto the face of the moon...

    1. Re:What's next? by Imperator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who would have thought that the mass production of lasers would lead to... 12-year old boys giggling in a movie theater and pissing everyone else off?

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  35. Re:Get it right, pimple faced sci fi losers by KDan · · Score: 3, Informative

    The parent is absolutely correct (at least in the content :-P). It's a volume of very hot gas enclosed in an electromagnetic field. Nothing spectacular about this, and still requires an enclosing apparatus (rather than, say, generating a forcefield around the apparatus).

    This is an advance in technology, for sure - it's a very fast valve. But there's no physics breakthrough involved. It's just an application of an old theory to an old problem, made possible by advances in technological expertise and practice. It's a clever hack but it's not a force field.

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
  36. Maxwell's Demon Implemented by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Did anyone else in the process of reading this think "Gee, this sounds just like Maxwell's Demon."

    Maxwell's Demon is a physics problem the is the basis of quantum mechanics. Simply, suppose you had a tank of air that was divided in 2 by a tiny split, with a gate. At the gate is a "demon" who lets high energy particle in on side, and low-energy particles in the other.

    Theoretically, by expending no energy save that to open and close the gate (plus whatever overhead the Demon requires) you could thwart the laws of physics. Soon one side of the tank would be "cold" and the other "hot" even if they both started off at the same temperature.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Maxwell's Demon Implemented by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the best example of this would be the Hilsch Tube.

      BLow air in the middle, hot air blows out one end and cold air blows out the other. Temperature difference can be as much as a few hundred degrees C depending on the configuration used! (Still doesn't violate any laws of thermodynamics though... but it does 'sort' high and low energy molecules without ant "extra" energy)
      =Smidge=

  37. Umm, calc please! by teeheehee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Correction:

    15,000 / 50 = 300

    50 is completely reasonable here...

    I'm not as sure about this, but I found a link in Google to something that looks reputable... some plasmas exist at temparatures as low as 1,500 degrees. According to this [www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us] water turns to plasma at 1,500 degrees - but unspecified Kelvin, Celsius, or Fahrenheit. If it's Fahrenheit (a farely safe assumption that it's either F or K because it's US,) then 1,500 F = 1088.7055555556 Kelvin, so it's still within reason. If it's Celsius, then 1,500 C = 1773.15 Kelvins, still not so bad...

    --
    "We are not always what we seem, and hardly ever what we dream."
    Schmendrick the Magician
  38. Yeah but... by mikosullivan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... does it make that cool "Bzzzzt" sound when you walk into it?

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:Yeah but... by Arcturax · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like a sizzle given it is at 15000K

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  39. Re:if you had this, say.... by djward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, considering the air molecules are still colliding with *something*, namely the force field, the air friction would still be there...

  40. Re:Plasma Rays by Little+Brother · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blasters possibly, I really have no opinion on that, but lightsabers are still a bit off. Lightsabres are cohesive, that is, if you move the handle, the blade moves as though it were completly solid. It is unaffected by, or at least overcomes, the inertial forces that would cause it to bend (think of swinging a rubber lightsaber). It is not clear that a force field would allow this to happen. (Although it is possible) The biger problem with lightsabers, is that they are completly powered at the base of the beam, while the "force fields" span a gap between two (or more) points. We have, at this time, no way to terminate the lightsaber blade.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  41. Re:Hehehe what?? by chainsaw1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except this wall has a very small, negligable mass.

    Thus, you could also make a balloon with extra lifting capasity just by vacuuming out the inside of a field. It could also fly closer to space than any other balloon, since it has a vacuume(essentially 0 density).

    Or you could have containment for mass-sensitive matter (antimatter, etc.)

    How about a see-through wall with zero heat transfer by contact?

    How about a wall that cannot melt, because there is nothing there to melt? We may finally have something we can melt diamond/carbon in

    Sometimes you have to think outside the ridgid plasma cube

    --
    - Sig
  42. Re:You are smoking crack by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or how about we don't convert away from an absolute temperature scale before dividing things all over the place?

    If you convert to C first, you've just assigned an arbitrary zero to the scale and cut off about 90% of room temp, but only about 2% of the force field temp, so of course when you then go dividing by 50 it doesn't work out.

    Remember kiddies: arbitrary scales are all well and good for addition and subtraction, but don't go messing around with multiplication and division; you'll end up a pregnant murderer who supports terrorists.

  43. Re:You are smoking crack by TheKodiak · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about not being a moron? Would you like an analogous operation? Let's say you're doing .1 kph over the speed limit (which happens to be, say, 30kph) and a guy zooms past you at 60kph. Would it be fair to say he's driving 300 times faster than you are?

    Celsius includes an arbitrary constant. If you multiply a celsius measurement, you're multiplying the constant and creating a new scale.

    Not that it really makes much sense to say "x is y times hotter than z" in the first place, but at least there are things that scale roughly linearly with Kelvins. Nothing scales linearly with degrees Celsius.

    In fact, that's an even better example - I don't think you can follow this one, but other readers might be able to hack it. PV=nRT. So if I have a quantity of gas at -1C, and it occupies 1L of space, and I heat it to 1C - WTF! OMG! I HAVE CREATED FUCKING NEGATIVE SPACE! I AM THE MASTER OF SPACE AND TIME!

    --
    -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
  44. Except for that whole reduced boiling point thing. by Jack_Frost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The body can stand immense positive pressure, but nasty things happen with very low pressures. The boiling points for things like water (which your flesh has in abundance) come way down. Check out the water phase diagram sometime. Interesting things happen at sufficiently low pressures, like room temperature boiling, sublimation, etc that are beyond the normal intuitive understanding of everyday materials.

  45. Re:Except for that whole reduced boiling point thi by Bill+Currie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The worst that happens to flesh exposed to vacuum is a modest amount of cell damage at the surfrace, and (possibly) the bends. I don't have a link, but I remember reading an article somewhere about a test pilot removing his glove while at some stupidly high altitude. All that happened was his hand got cold (it wasn't quite a vacuum), red and some minor cell damage on the surface layers. Skin does an admirable job of keeping the water in :)

    Heck, large quantities of youths get smallish (~1 square inch) regions of flesh exposed to near vacuum conditions all the time with nothing worse than a red welt to show for it.

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  46. w0000000T! I worked on this project........ by aimless · · Score: 5, Informative

    And it IS Awesome!

    I worked on the pre-cursor to the plasma valve at BNL, the Vaunted "Plasma Window" (ooooh, ahhh)

    The thing really is incredible, and yes, I accepted the project because I read the description, and went..."Holy C*ap! That is just like the shuttle bay!" And it is, well...if the shuttle bay were ~4-6mm in diameter =)

    And about the 15K Kelvin thing, yes plasmas do get that hot, but lets get real here, the thing is tiny...I bet the lights above your head get just as hot in the middle of their plasmas.

    Anyway, the project I worked on was very robust and partially scaleable, just would require a boatload of power. It was very "loud" but not "noisy" as we could put very sensitive equipment right next to it and there would be no interference (you physics types should get this) and when you take a collimated beam of light...in one case a green laser, it will shine clear through it with next to no loss, which is a huge improvement over any other method of separating Atmosphere from Vacuum.

    Mind you, this would be only the first stage in a series of differential pumping to get down to UHVacuum.

    Gratz to Ady, he is one helluv a guy!

    -Chris

  47. Re:Zap Field by tantrum · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where can we find some pix?

    Let me get this right.. you want a picture of a vacuum surrounded by air. Now that sounds like a nice picture.
  48. Re:Zap Field by ebh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got a good picture of it here.

  49. Re:Maybe 'force fields' isn't a good name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had found this to be an interesting read, but I would need to see it to beleive it. ...David Swenson of 3M Corporation describes an anomaly where workers encountered a strange "invisible wall" in the area under a fast-moving sheet of electrically charged polypropelene film in a factory. ...

    rest of arcticle can be found here
    http://www.amasci.com/weird/unusual/e-wall.h tml

  50. Re:Scale? by jpatters · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your comment is quite silly. The entire sentence, from the article, is:

    At 15,000 degrees Celsius (27,032 degrees Fahrenheit), the plasma valve is about 50 times hotter than room temperature when measured in degrees Kelvin.

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."