Slashdot Mirror


ReplayTV DVR to Remove Features

KarlTheGhoul writes "D&M Holdings Inc. on Tuesday said its new ReplayTV digital television recorder will not include controversial features such as automatically skipping commercials and sharing shows via the Internet." This is a confirmation of our earlier story. Their new ad slogan will be "Costs More, Less Useful".

31 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. I will buy a Tivo by stonebeat.org · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In that case I will buy a Tivo

    1. Re:I will buy a Tivo by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fair enough, though Tivo doesn't include either of these features! I guess that means they won't "take them away from you," but perhaps you won't be getting as much as you think you'll get.

  2. Just wait by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that eventually the average consumer will be clued in to things like these and the manufacturers will start feeling the pain. So we'll either have to go with an "illegal" solution, or the folks who make this products will give Big Media the finger. It's all downhill from there...

    1. Re:Just wait by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't know. People have been predicting the downfall of the mainstream media for a while for the same reasons. My feeling is that people never notice what is bad unless their is an alternative. People don't say "wow, our society could be so much better if...", they say "wow, our society isn't nearly as good as..." or, in this case, "wow, my TiVo doesn't do nearly as much as so-and-so's..."

      The reason that peope have largely lashed back at Big Music is because there is a clear alternative which applies not just to consumers' sense of moral wrongitude, but their pocketbooks: Kazaa, Gnutella, or what-have-you. Until people see the alternative that they aren't supposed to know about, just the abstracted idea of not being able to do something that the technology does allow isn't going to catch the public's attention much.

      Look at how people seem to feel about Big Music. Reading that ABC News article about the RIT student who settled with the RIAA by paying them $12,000, I was truly surprised at how openly critical of the RIAA the article seemed to be, at least, for another member of Big Media, so to speak. It's not that there's a whole open political movement, but rather that so many people, including, most likely, the ABC News correspondent, simply share music files and the RIAA has made anyone who shares files their enemy, quite publicly. They made the consumers the enemy, not the other way around.

      So why will there be no immediate lash back at Big Media for restricting things like the TiVo? Because whats the illegal alternative? What free software are people going to download onto their box-top sets out of self-interest which will essentially make them unwitting enemies of Big Media? There is none; short of complicated and risky hardware-hacking, people won't be exposed to what they are missing.

      If one TiVo-type product is available in the store with ad-skipping, and the other without, sure, there'll be a preference. But if people are never presented with the option? Then there will be no complaints. Just don't let them see what they're missing and no one is the wiser.

    2. Re:Just wait by eison · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If one TiVo-type product is available in the store with ad-skipping, and the other without, sure, there'll be a preference.

      Nope.
      There was, it was called ReplayTV. And, people still preferred TiVo. I can't explain it, but there you have it.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    3. Re:Just wait by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      [...good argument about lack of clear alternatives....]

      Look what happened with mp3's. When the technology was to the point where everyone could use it, then everyone did.

      Video is bigger and more difficult to do.

      Still, I would suppose it is just a matter of time before anyone can get a fairly standard PC with fairly standard hardware, download a "live" bootable Linux CD with the necessary beautiful user interface, and have an instant PVR. This would save video to their existing FAT32 or NTFS partition. Then you remove the CD, reboot, and joe consumer is back in his precious Windows environment.

      This scenerio seems most likely to me. It must be simple before joe average can do it. Just because super computer geek can do it doesn't mean much except that it makes a good conversation piece for joe consumer who is a friend of super computer geek. To get joe consumer to do this, it must be as easy as downloading a CD, and not messing with their sacred Windows installation.

      This also has nice side effects....
      • Raises awareness of Linux. (Hey, this Linux stuff is pretty cool! It lets me record my TV programs using standard hardware. Nice friendly interface too.)
      • Gives consumers the PVR tool that they want, which ReplyTV and SonicBlue can't sell, and Tivo won't sell.
      • Might compete on some level with Windows media pc's.
      If it were this easy, average consumers would do it. It would be just like the whole mp3 vs. RIAA thing all over again.
      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  3. well by karma-whoring · · Score: 1, Insightful

    can't skip commercials? guess I'll have to skip buying their product. time-shift would still let you fastforward through - just start watching your program 30mintues later so you have an ad buffer.

  4. Slogan by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or maybe their new slogan should be "Trying Not To Go Bankrupt a Third Time!".

    Those features got them sued into oblivion. They'll get anyone sued into oblivion frankly, because the media companies won't abide it, and you're going to have a hard time convincing a judge that it's not a copyright violation to share shows.

    Removing the commercial skip bit is lame, since there are VCRs that do this already and they've never been attacked. But D&M is obviously hoping to get friendlier with the media companies, and this is another thing they hate.

    That said, as best I can tell they just removed the two features that made Replay preferable to TiVo... and the rest of their software is inferior. So I don't quite get where they hope to position the brand at.

    1. Re:Slogan by aborchers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and you're going to have a hard time convincing a judge that it's not a copyright violation to share shows


      Because in most cases it is, perhaps?

      I am an avowed enemy of the copyright cartel because of their heavy-handed tactics and their meddling with public policy and the tech industry. Nonetheless, if it weren't for people infringing their coprights, they wouldn't be wasting their time and money in these pursuits.

      Every time I think about the fact that I don't have a legal DVD player for Linux or can't play my last (as in "most recent" as well as "final") major label CD purchase on my notebook computer, I want to pitch an entertainment industry copyright lawyer in the east river weighed down with the corpse of a "sharer"...
      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    2. Re:Slogan by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow... someone who gets it!

      Heck, I have an 8000+ MP3 collection. And every single one of them is ripped and encoded off of a CD I own. Admittedly, I'm soon going to be adding some stuff downloaded from the Internet. From the band's site, for free, with their permission.

      Replay's show sharing feature was allegedly for sharing between Replay boxes only. Except that they didn't protect it at all and made the protocol trivial to spoof. It's called due diligence, and both of Replay's former owners failed at it. D&M looks like they're going to try harder (or, rather, avoid the issue entirely).

    3. Re:Slogan by haystor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, I didn't state it too clearly earlier. I certainly think the guilt lies with the criminal.

      But, the RIAA say that everyone is stealing. They still sell this music to those same people that are pirating it.
      They then blame the service providers (Napster was a bad choice, use some other P2P one or just a search engine).

      I'm saying that if everyone else is going to be at fault for these things getting copied around, then the RIAA needs to be consistent in their due diligence and stop selling to all the people that are pirating. Since they say that its pretty much everyone...well, then they should stop providing those people with the content to steal from them.

      Its hard to come up with a physical analogy since its not truly stealing, rather its stealing potential sales. If a known burglar came into my shop and asked for a crowbar I would have to turn him down. If the RIAA knows that 80% of people steal content, they shouldn't provide those people with content that they can make copies of for other people.

      This argument would only make sense if you first assume that the RIAA is correct that everyone that facilitates is equally liable.

      As far as DRM. Bring it on. Go ahead and put it on everything and everywhere. I'm perfectly willing to live without things I don't think are worth paying for. I've already got DRM on several software programs and don't mind it at all. I pay for the works I use and I don't try or buy the things I can't preview. A lot of Linux zealots want the government to crush MicroSoft. I'd prefer they be turned loose to run rampant. They are the best thing that's happened to open source.

      --
      t
  5. Lemme get this straight by Brento · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They couldn't beat Tivo in the DVR game with more features and a lower price.

    Now, Tivo's got the awesome Home Media Option out that lets you play MP3's on your Tivo, which Replay never had.

    So now, best case scenario, they offer less features as Tivo at the same price? Or maybe a little lower?

    What's the business model here again?

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  6. No Distinction by BlueWaldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think ReplayTV is going to be able to take over TiVo's spot in the market unless they are able to offer somthing TiVo doesn't. I guess they are in a tight spot not wanting to get sued, but I think this is a move in the wring direction unless they like being second best.

  7. But the advertisers... by Andorion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However much I'd love to skip commercials, I can definitely see why advertisers and more importantly the networks are concerned (and you should be able to, too.) If fewer people watch the ads, the ads are worth less money - money which goes to producing shows. I'd be the first in line to sign a "Ray Romano gets paid too much" petition, but that's besides the point - without income from advertising (or with reduced income) I predict we'll either see show quality decline or cable costs go up. All it'll take is a few more years, when DVR comes built in every TV (or nearly everyone has a box.)

    ~Berj

    1. Re:But the advertisers... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The concern most people have here, though, is not that they have a right not to view the ads; such a right is quite basic, as it goes hand-in-hand with your right not to view TV. This is quite different from a right, however, to view TV without the ads; when you accept an essentially free gift from the networks (however crappy the programming may be) you accept it on their terms; they would be well within their rights to say, "Don't like ads? Don't watch TV." As the ads become more pervasive, this is essentially what they are saying.

      Rather, critics are bothered by the impact that a totally seperate industry can have on what sort of consumer electronics are even available to us with what capabilities. Were the TV networks to dislike this, they could force contractual agreements with consumers banning the use of these devices (purely hypothetically, of course). But instead they choose a less direct means of asserting their power, which translates to a means of, from a really sinister viewpoint, pacifying the natives.

      Rather than openly tell us who's decision it was, the networks use threats and bribes to induce the hardware manufacturers into denying consumers an otherwise profitable and desirable product. This echos far too similarly to the practice of the RIAA of suing the pants off anyone who manufactures software or hardware that appears to threaten them ("Hey, baby, you don't need to sue me to get my pants off...") regardless of significant legitimate use.

      This direction-through-indirection is merely annoying at best, but really a terrifying over-stepping of commercial bounds at worst. The government, who supposedly represents us all, is entrusted with the rights to deny us harmful or dangerous products. We trust that such an action is in our best interest, and that the reasons for such an action are the reasons stated up front--no underhanded manipulation is ever acceptible in a democracy--but we have given no such trust to any corporation. When a corporation who's business is televised entertainment, no less, makes for us a decision on what hardware is good and what is bad, it oversteps its commercial bounds.

  8. Come on Mikey. by grub · · Score: 1, Insightful


    Their new ad slogan will be "Costs More, Less Useful"

    Is that really necessary from a (presumably) unbiased editor?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Come on Mikey. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think /. editors have ever claimed to be unbiased, and you'd have to be blind to assume they were.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Come on Mikey. by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is that really necessary from a (presumably) unbiased editor?

      I know it's been asked before, but I may as well ask again: where have the editors on Slashdot said they're unbiased? Where is it stated as a requirement that Slashdot editors be unbiased? An editor who doesn't have a bias wouldn't be able to pick the good stories from the bad. . . Slashdot's editors are just more vocal about their biases than others. Where editors of larger newspapers have to be discreet, /. can place the bias out on the table for everyone to see - which really is doing its readers a favor, since you don't have to read as critically to find out the editorial spin here as you would on, say, FoxNews.

      Think of it as open source bias, if that will help. :)

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  9. Don't get so worked up. by stanmann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't automagically skip comercials doesn't mean you can't do a 15/30 second skip or jump forward. Just means that the box won't have the current feature which autodetects and skips commercials. Obviously, a compromise solution, but not earthshattering or skybreaking.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  10. civilization is once again slowed... by waytoomuchespresso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...from gaining useful technology. There is something seriously wrong with the interactions of corporations between themselves and then that impact refected onto society...
    Perhaps a lack of a personality, ethics, independent goals, etc. Perhaps a rethink of the legal fictions would be in order.

  11. This Changes Nothing Important by joel8x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The internet sharing feature was crappy because it was slow and there was too much work involved to get something that you can get from Bit Torrent faster. The automatic commercial skip was flaky (I turned it off right away anyway) because you always ended up with snippets of show missing. As long as I have my 30 second skip button on my remote than I'm happy.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  12. Re:Failure ahead for Replay... by mh_tang · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Go read their service agreement. It says that anyone who buys the service agrees that features may be added or removed at any time. And of course, buying the box without service gets you nothing more than a doorstop.

    If Replay drops these features in the 5500 series, it will just create a very hot secondary/used market for the older 5000 models that still have Commercial Advance & Send Show features.

    So in my opinion, there's the possibility that they not only remove these features from new units, but also retroactively from the older 4000 and 5000 series also. Potentially very bad news for people who have shelled out $250 for a lifetime subscription recently...

  13. Re:Who needs it then? by chmilar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The nice thing about ReplayTV and Tivo is that they are "appliances". You buy it, take it home, plug it in, and it just works. It does it's one task very well, and you don't have to worry about it.

    The "bonus" has turned out to be the "hack-ability" of both Replay and Tivo. You can easily upgrade to larger hard drives. The networked models allow shows to be copied to a computer.

    A PC-based PVR will be even more flexible, but it is not yet a consumer-level "appliance".

    --
    Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
  14. PC Based DVR is alas, not the answer by btempleton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many people have proposed doing DVRs with old standard PCs using ideally, open source software. Sounds great, more flexible, everything wonderful.

    Until you look at the power. Check how much more power that always-on PC takes than a standalone box. Here in California, for example, every watt of 24/7 power costs $1.13 per year or more. So a 200 watt PC costs over $200 per year to run, $150 more than say, a 50 watt standalone device. Not to mention the damage to the environment.

    In other words, you can pay for the standalone device pretty quickly, even if you had a "free" PC just stting around.

    Now you could fix this problem if you could arrange for the PC to go into a sleep mode when it doesn't have anything to do, at the cost of waiting a little longer to come up when you turn it on to watch something with the remote. This requires the PC have in it a sleep mode with a clock which allows you to say, "Wake up in 3 hours". How many have this? How many have coded for it.

    The standalone device can also do this easily.

    And you lose the "always recording something to spare disk space" feature that people love about the Tivo.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  15. Skipping Commercials.... Stealing? But... by R-2-RO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So if I get up to go to the bathroom, or when I start flipping channels during commercials, I'm stealing?

    Or is it the automagic skipping that has folks upset? When I see a commercial, I automatically skip it anyway.. so boom there. Sux for me. I'm a crook!

    --
    Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
  16. Re:Grounds for a lawsuit... by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And THAT is why I will never own a Tivo or other device like it, I can never be sure that a week after I buy it all the things that made me buy the device will not be removed. With a normal consumer device it has a set featureset, I guess if I want a PVR it will have to be a home rolled one based on open data. Yes I realize how great things like season pass are but I have no assurance that they will be there after I purchase it.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  17. You can't serve two masters by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think PVRs are a type of application that will outshine even Operating Systems, in showing just how superior Free Software can be, relative to proprietary software.

    I still use my Tivo, but even before the day I bought it, I knew that Tivo's time was running out. Tivo tries to be a good product, but even from the beginning, it was explicitly clear that being the best it could be, was not quite the goal. They had "partners." They were at risk from incurring the wrath of advertisers and TV networks. So a balance had to be struck. I am glad that the balance was so far in my favor, and I have enjoyed my Tivo very much. But reminders of the compromise have always been present (don't get me started). And now it is clear that the situation with ReplayTV is no different.

    Free Software is accountable to only one party: whoever uses it. Except for the finite supply of developer labor, there is no limit to how good it can be for the user. There is no party who will influence it toward being less good or force it to be less functional than what people want. There is no compromise, and there is no attempt to serve two masters.

    If MythTV and Freevo don't already kick Tivo's and ReplayTV's asses yet, they inevitably will in the future. I don't know if the Tivos and Replays and Microsofts will still be around in this market a few years from now, but I do know that if they survive, it will be as crippled embarrassing parodies of the state of the art.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  18. Re:Failure ahead for Replay... by vaylen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You are right. Tivo isn't doing well. No PVR is doing well. While they all fight for the scraps in this dinky market, it is dying out from under them. With DVD recorders coming down in price and with functionality closer to traditional VCR's, they are poised to kill the PVR market because the old folks can't wrap their mind around time shifting. They understand concepts like recording onto a physical thing they can remove from the machine and stack on a shelf. They barely understood VCR's until the VCR+ Guide game out, and DVD recorders pander to this limited understanding.

    As far as Replay being sued into bankruptcy twice. You MIGHT argue once, but that's a pretty lame excuse for Tivo to use to not include such groundbreaking and enjoyment-enhancing features as commercial skip and show sharing. I can't believe how some people will flaunt the limitations of their device and extol the controls of their parent company as if it were a virtue. "In my country you can't fileshare, but that's a good thing because I know my goverment does it because they care about me and don't want mean laywers to come and get me in trouble". This WILL create a hot market for older Replay boxes which support these features. Sharing shows with buddies is a great, great thing. I've seen many an episode I've missed because of this feature. Maybe with SonicBlue no longer in control, PlanetReplay.com will be able to get their buddy sharing requests back up (fingers crossed).

    One last thing: Speaking of a 30 second advance button in the same context as a commercial skip feature is like saying a DVD player has fast forward because it has chapter advance. They do similar things, but they are not anywhere near the same feature. When commercial advance works (which is about 80%-85% of the time in my experience) you can watch a show without even being near the remote and never see a commercial. And when it doesn't work, it usually doesn't work for that show at all, so you can just treat it like the feature is turned off. I guess it's a shame they're taking it out, but I have mine, so the people who weren't early adopters are the real victims I guess.

    --

  19. Luckily.... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My homebuilt PVR continues to work great! I can skip commericals, view content on every computer in the house, and I don't have to pay a monthy fee.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  20. Has it not occurred to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That if DVRs continue to include commercial skipping software that cable prices would increase and the total number of ads would increase as well. Sucks to be poor.

  21. Re:I will buy a Tivo (viewing habits reporting) by telstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, I'm glad to share my viewing habits. All it means is that the more I watch what I like to watch ... the better chance of it not being taken off of the air. It's a tradeoff, but it's one I'm fine with.