Slashdot Mirror


America's Army Client For Linux Released

nexex writes "You can now download America's Army for Linux as a stand-alone installer. Previously it was only available as a full ISO on a Gentoo LiveCD." The official America's Army site has more info on this Army-sponsored FPS title, first released about a year ago for the PC, which "..provides civilians with an inside perspective and a virtual role in today's premier land force: the U.S. Army."

25 comments

  1. Bad experiences with america's army by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Informative

    I played it on Windows XP with a fairly decent computer (runs UT 2003 in 1024x768 with max details perfectly) and it was running like crap (well online playing, my ping was like crazy and it seemed pretty jumpy and not a smooth game (some games like Rainbow Six and Operation Flashpoint feel jumpy online, and other games like Urban Terror, Counter Strike and Quake 3, feel very smooth.) It seems like, the more realistic a game is, the worse online play is. Anyway, does anyone know how well this game runs in linux? My linux computer is only a 600 MHz PIII with 388 MB of RAM and a GeForce3 Ti200 and I don't think the download would be worth it.

    1. Re:Bad experiences with america's army by VultureMN · · Score: 3, Interesting
      For me, it runs just peachy on an XP 1700, MX2 400 (IIRC), and 512 MB RAM. If UT2003 runs okay for you, AA:Ops should. I dunno why you're having problems.


      I'd also like to plug AAO:TOPS, where you can vouch for people you think are good team players. I'm one of the devs, so go check it out and increase the traffic. :)

    2. Re:Bad experiences with america's army by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The more realistic a game is the more data has to be transmitted to reflect the users actions.

      The simplist of these is stance. In quake there really is only 1 hitmodel no matter wich physical model you play with. In war games you can usually crouch/layflat/lean/stand.

      Damage in quake is a simple number. In war games it usually is area specific.

      Of course a lot of this is also down to the network code being used. But since aa is based on ut (if I remember correctly) it shouldn't be to bad.

      For you fears of youre machine not being able to run it. If it can run it reasonbly in single play (I doubt it) the addition of the network handling shouldn't be to much of a problem. lets face it we played lag free games on P1's with the original quake.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    3. Re:Bad experiences with america's army by LazerImp · · Score: 1

      There is no single player mode; only the training missions (there are only two or three) are offline and everything else is online only.

  2. One thing you forgot mention. by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Originally this game was completely devoid of any cheat detection. Punkbuster has stepped up to tackle this but the results of this effort remain to be seen as one of the items that defines a good game is addressing exploits ASAP.

    Dolemite
    ________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
    1. Re:One thing you forgot mention. by laserlights2000 · · Score: 0

      Well, a free game released by the United States Army, free of cheating, thats got to be a joke. Now with a linux port, I'm expectin cheating to soar. Luckily I only played this game for the first two months after release, now I just play on Xbox Live, which so far has been cheat free, unless you consider glitch using a cheat, and most people don't do it anyways. I friend of mine was bragging about how he was able to create an auto aimer... how nice...

  3. Dunno, this game rubs me the wrong way by Sevn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read about it, it sounded cool. I downloaded it.
    Installed it. And it wouldn't let me play unless
    I registered for "boot camp" online. Fuhuck that.
    I did the real thing. I don't want to relive it in
    a game. I'd also rather not have to give over
    personal information just to play a war simulator.
    I'll stick with InstaUnlagged, OSP, and any other
    railgun mods for q3 for now, until such time as
    Doom 3 and halflife2 make an appearance.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:Dunno, this game rubs me the wrong way by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2, Informative

      erm.. you don't have to give any personal info to register. You just need to make up a username/password.

      --

      Liberty.

    2. Re:Dunno, this game rubs me the wrong way by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Almost every FPS I have played in the last 3-4 years has forced me into some sort of training mode- with military boot camp being the most common. Half-Life (Opposing Forces), Medal of Honor, etc, etc. This is where you learn to play the game, not become indoctrinated in the Army mentality.

      It's a good idea to have people learn to move, and shoot on their own time- not in a real game, with 19 other people wondering what the heck their problem is.

      (I did the real thing twice...and it actually was pretty fun..)

      --
      No reason to lie.
  4. great game, shame about the jerks by Traderdot · · Score: 3, Informative
    i played this game when it first came out. it's amazing that such a game could be free. of course, it serves as propaganda/recruitment tool and supported by the taxpayer's dollar but still it was really fun.

    as with most online games, a variety of problems developed. cheats and just plain jerks, team killers, "rambo" types ruined the experience. they also had a bunch of network issues. i haven't played for months now. hopefully they've fixed those things.

  5. Update for everybody by chrismcdirty · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just so everybody knows...

    The early versions did have very bad netcode. But I would like to point out that since it was the Unrealy Warfare engine, the netcode was much better than the Quake 3 engine, which doesn't allow modem play too well (ever try to play Jedi Knights with a modem? My ping was always 999). Since that time, they've updated the version of the Unreal Warfare engine (the version number is not in my mind right now). The version of the game is 1.7 and soon to be 2.0 (most likely) by the end of the month. The new update should be providing Combat Lifesavers, the implementation of PunkBuster, new player models, and of course, a new map.

    And for everyone who complains about it being Army propaganda, get over it... it's free. It's not like you HAVE to join if you play. The basic training only takes a few minutes to complete for most people. I'm not brainwashed... I just think it's a good game that should be given a chance. In fact, I'm so not brainwashed, I've been playing RTCW:ET lately and haven't touched this game in like a week.

    --
    It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    1. Re:Update for everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Quake 3 was released, I didn't have a broadband connection, but spend a lot of time online playing q3a using a modem connection. Your statement that the q3 engine doesn't allow modem play too well is False. You can play Quake 3 online with a modem without a problem.

  6. Here's the Bittorrent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the bittorrent link for those who are interested:
    https://eris.westcarolina.net/~mrklaw /bt/armyops-l nx-170.sh.bin.torrent

    Don't forget to delete the space slashdot so kindly adds for you!

    JC

  7. Added realism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you get to abduct "combatants" and detain them indefinitely in violation of international treaties whilst claiming that they aren't prisoners of war?

    Or is that a forthcoming feature?

    1. Re:Added realism by Poofat · · Score: 1

      Go read the geneva convention, there are specific rules about when a prisoner is a POW. And it is not just because they were shooting at you.

  8. Great Game by jelevy01 · · Score: 1

    I play this game on Windows XP. It is fantastic. You need a lot of mussle to run it, but is has great gameplay, unlike other battle games, it forces you to really use some sort of tactic instead of just running out to be killed instantly.

  9. ooooo by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Before long, I'll need both hands to count how many games Linux has. Kudos!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:ooooo by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      I mod you +1 for funny. I know the feeling though. I have no desire to do the Transgaming thing because I want my stuff native. Icculus rules for that. Of course I have UT2003, but also the full RTCW, the new RTCW-ET, Serious Sam 2, Descent3, Heavy Gear2, and assorted other linux games like Chromium, Bzflag, GlTron, Frozen Bubble, and others. Gentoo is my preferred gaming platform since you don't end up with as much crap holding the system back like default RH and MDK installs. Specs for you geeks out there who think linux is only for 486's: P4 2.4 @ 2.88 (watercooled) 1GB PC3500 80GB Seagate 16x Pioneer DVD (best damn DVD-ROM available) floppy? Hell no, card reader!! SB Audigy Crusty old Asus GF3 (waiting for the FX5900) BTW, my kernels compile fine on an overclocked machine too. :)

  10. Does It Support More Than NVIDIA Under Linux by blazerw11 · · Score: 1

    I've got an ATI 7500, so no ATI drivers for me.

    --
    A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
  11. Re:Boycott United Sexist Army! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god! My geek girlfriend is going to dump me with my procession of United $exist Army!

  12. Re:Boycott United Sexist Army! by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of women in the US Army. Just not in combat positions. This game is about combat, not logistics, intelligence, engineering, and any number of non-combat positions filled by women. Lack of glorification makes non-combat positions no less important.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  13. Re:Boycott United Sexist Army! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If non-combat position is so important, why the hell US Army game was designed such that only combat positions are available? This is no oversight, but rather an poor excuse to undermine female roles in the army. The macho programmers were trying to kill two birds in one stone (or one bullet if you prefer).