Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart Enters NetFlix's Business

wcbrown writes "AP reports that Wal-Mart is entering into the online DVD rental arena, currently dominated by Netflix. Wal-Mart is starting out with 13,000 titles, six distribution centers, and competitive pricing. With a seriously tremendous infrastructure and expansive will, Wal-Mart stands poised to overtake Netflix. To say the least, that's not going to be good for business."

31 of 679 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by drfuchs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't necessarily bad for NetFlix. First, it "validates" the market, and gives NetFlix a bunch of free PR (all the articles about the Walmart entering the fray will compare/contrast with NetFlix), including making tens of millions of consumers more aware of this new sort of rental scheme that they just don't grok yet. Second, it makes NetFlix a take-over target for any other company wanting to join in the competition (perhaps even BlockBuster, if their home-grown offering falters). Then again, maybe NetFlix will get blown out of the water.

    1. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by drfuchs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      p.s. Also, all non-Walmart stores that sell DVD players (Circuit City, Best Buy, CostCo etc.) are motivated to push NetFlix on their customers, rather than Walmart, with whom they compete. Everything from the salesperson suggesting NetFlix (and perhaps getting a kick-back if you sign up), to NetFlix coupons in/on the box, to PR at the Point-Of-Sale.

    2. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by markv242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Substitute "Netscape" for "Netflix", and "Microsoft" for "Wal-Mart" and your comment seems frighteningly on-target.

    3. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      no, it's bad for netflix because walmart has a virtually limitless warchest and can win by attrition. how big is walmart?
      • last year their revenues were $200 billion us. that's more than the gdp of israel
      • of the 10 richest people in the world, five are waltons (of walmart fame). you think gates is a fat cat? the waltons are downright obese!
      • heck, s. robson walton may even be richer than bill! the "rich list 2001" claimed that s.r. had a personal bankroll of 65 billion, and placed him in the top slot for wealth worldwide.
      • walmart has 1 million employees. three times general motors.
      • however, despite all this, the average walmart employee makes only 15k/year.
      how do you beat that kind of war chest?
    4. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by netsharc · · Score: 4, Funny

      They sell Lindows computers online. Argh, conflict, they sell Linux-based system, that's good, but they're attacking NetFlix, that's bad. But Lindows is dumb and Michael Robertson is just like Gates (exploits others' technology to make money), so it's down with Wal-Mart! Down with Wal-Mart!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    5. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by osxuser-02 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Except that Wal-Mart is not a convicted monopolist. Netflix at least has a fighting chance, Netscape didn't.

      It's in their blood, though. Wal-mart has been convicted of dropping prices below cost at individual stores to kill the local mom'n'pop competition. Then they would jack the prices back up when they became the only game in town.

      It was pretty popular for Wal-mart when opening new stores in small towns, before they were busted for it.

      --

      I went to college for this?...

  2. Patent by ihummel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick Jeff Bezos, patent DVD rentals and save us from Walmart!

  3. Family fun! by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh boy! Now I can watch the entire Jersey Trilogy without the elaborate strings of curses and insults! Thanks Walmart. We may even be able to get a family-friendly "Pulp Fiction" available for rent soon. Junior will love it.

    1. Re:Family fun! by Elvisisdead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bought Dogma at Wal-Mart. Unedited.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    2. Re:Family fun! by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      We may even be able to get a family-friendly "Pulp Fiction" available for rent soon

      Ving Rhames: "..and wait for the Wolf, who will be arriving directly"

      Samuel L. Jackson: "Golly attractive and successful African-American, thats all you had to say!"

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  4. Although they might do it.... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last week my local Walmar had a large vending machine that dispensed the DVD that you wanted to rent. and the machine would accept the returns also.

    All I needed was my credit card/ debit card.

    Maybe they are looking to expand in both online rental and vending style?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Competition by Lizard_King · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To say the least, that's not going to be good for business

    Competition is good for the consumer.

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    1. Re:Competition by Indomitus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Walmart doesn't tend fo "compete" in the same way as other companies. Since they make up such a large percentage of sales of things like movies, CDs, and magazines they make a lot of demands on distributors that other companies can't ask for. This puts their competition on a very un-level playing field and has the result of killing or severely weakening any threats to Walmart's dominance. That is _not_ good for the consumer in the long run.

    2. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What is so unfair about Wal-Mart moving into the online DVD rental business?

      Maybe now we will see some "innovations" in Netflix's offerings?

    3. Re:Competition by oopy_-_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      It looks like the first innovation Wal-Mart made was shifting the liability for lost/stolen DVDs to the consumer. With NetFlix, as long as it doesn't happen often, you don't get penalized for having one lost in the mail, with Wal-Mart, it costs you $17.88 (see here).

  6. Selection problems by MrLint · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well as we have seen Walmart has a long and unbroken track record of removing/banning/censoring things too non-consertative/too non-christian/too non-'patrotic'/too 'contreversial' for their perceived vanilla brain dead store-goers. It will remain to be seen what they actually make available.

  7. The only problem for me is... by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That when I go to rent a movie, it's usually on a spur of the moment thing. It's like I ask my wife "what would you like to do tonight" and she might say I don't know...wanna rent a movie?

    So then we go down to the rental place and look around, not really sure what we want and pick something up and go home THAT NIGHT and watch a movie.

    With renting a movie over the net and having it mailed to you isn't quite what we're looking for. We want something we can see that night, not two days from then...because the way we live two days from then we might be doing something else that comes up etc etc. We live by the seat of our pants and never really plan out little things like movie watching in advance.

    At least, that's how we play it. Is there really that much need for this out there? Just curious.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:The only problem for me is... by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Informative
      That when I go to rent a movie, it's usually on a spur of the moment thing.

      You, my friend, do not have young children. "Hey, let's go get a movie" turns into a two-hour ordeal of car-seats, crying, dropped ice-cream, potty breaks and/or diaper changes, and so on...

      The reality is that you give up a little spontaneity for a lot of convenience. You don't find hopping over to the video store for a movie all that troublesome, but there are plenty of people who do. Having a movie you want to see, right at hand, when you find yourself with a couple of hours of peace is a luxury to a lot of people.

      I work with a guy whose family lives in Alaska. The one video store in town has a pitiful selection. Netflix provides something they simply can't get otherwise.

      As far as movies go, there is a high psychological threshold that has to be reached in order to go rent a movie. Why? Because you have to go, pay on the spot, and are committed to going back within a few days to a week to return the movie. You are less likely to rent something wierd or experiement with different tastes because, well, because, that's just how most people are. But clicking on a movie on the site is low-threshold, and I find myself putting all sorts of odd movies on my netflix list that I would almost certainly never go through the effort to rent at Blockbuster.

  8. You want to make some SERIOUS money? by WndrBr3d · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rent DVD porn. I'm serious, the porn market on the internet already makes insane amounts of money. All you need to do is start up a NetFlix service that rents out DVD porn.

    Both NetFlix and the new Wal-Mart service will not carry such titles.

    And if anyone out there knows of a service like this already, please, let me know :-D

    1. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rent DVD porn. I'm serious, the porn market on the internet already makes insane amounts of money.

      Ugh. I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals.

  9. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players

    At $40 or so for a DVD player, who can't afford one?

    Well, how much are you going to be able to slash prices on an online DVD rental?

    I doubt that's the point. People do their grocery shopping at Wal-mart since groceries are there too. Now they won't have to stop by the video store on the way home either.

  10. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Maeryk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really don't mean this to be a troll... but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

    You kidding me? Where else can you get a DVD player for 40 bucks? not Rad Shack.. anything they sell has to be at least 80.. or they wont sell it. Walmart can hook you up with a passable home theater for under 500 bucks.. and they stock a fairly reasonable selection of DVDs and videos. (And yes, even pulp fiction, uncut, last time I was there looking).

    So this is the next logical step for them. Super Walmarts have replaced the shopping mall for all intents and purposes. (Sure.. they sell Kmart level CRAP in most cases, but in some instances you can get good deals there.) The one here has a pharmacy, a grocery store, a pearle vision center, automotive, the usual Walmart crap, a decent electronics and sporting goods area, and an outdoors home decor shop. There really isnt any reason to shop anywhere else. (Unless you want to go to home despot for hardware..).

    This is exactly the demographic they want.. the kind of people who are at wal-mart three times a week grocery shopping anyway. The difference between a scheme like this and the ill fated VHS in grocery stores, would be selection.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  11. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by Zuke8675309 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will be good for the consumer because there will be price competition. As it stands now, Netflix has cut down on service and raised prices since they started. In fact, this is EXACTLY the type of service that Wal-Mart should EXCEL at. Wal-Mart is a master of the supply chain, which is the main issue with DVD rental through the mail.

    I don't understand the argument against Wal-Mart in regards to small businesses. If Wal-Mart undercut everyone else, pushed small businesses out of business, and then jacked their prices up I could understand the argument. I haven't seen that though, they're always the lowest price. Lowest price is good for consumers. As for the service aspect - I don't need good service to buy rubbermaid, toilet paper, toys, video games, or dvds. I just need/want low price.

  12. The market is self-correcting by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not good for the consumer? Rubbish. You act as though aggressive competition guarantees an irrevocable market dominance. It doesn't! As soon as your theoretical future-walmart doesn't meet the consumer's desire for quality+low prices+convenience (something it currently does quite well, mind you) another business can rise up to meet that need.

    Give the consumer due credit -- when a company takes it's customer base for granted and acts like a "dinosaur" it loses market share to smaller, more nimble companies that give the customer what they want. The business history books are full of examples (see Sears & Roebuck, K-Mark, IBM, etc.)

    Result? Problem solved, unless you simply don't believe that capitalism works.

  13. Even bigger than that by EisPick · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to this article in Slate, Wal-Mart, with $244 billion in revenues last year, represents nearly 2.5 percent of the U.S. economy. Worldwide, they employ 1.38 million.

  14. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Maeryk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gee, just what I always wanted! A censored DVD rental company! Sigh. I have lost complete and total respect for Wal-Mart over the years. First they started flexing their muscles to censor the video game industry and made it plain that any video game they didn't like wouldn't be sold by Wal-Mart, thus making game companies cave and self-edit their games. Then they pulled some men's magazines off their shelves that had less female skin than most women's magazines these days. Now they want to start renting out DVDs, which I'm quite sure are censored? Heh, good luck.


    YEah! I DEMAND streaming porn on the projector at elementary schools! Who is WalMart to tell us what they will and wont sell! HOW DARE THEY have some morals and make decisions that they feel protect their clientele!

    Sheesh.. the NERVE of walmart to think that someone like me may not want my six year old son asking why a mostly naked wrestling chick is on the front cover of STUFF magazine in the checkout line! (Stacy Kiebler.. next month).

    Well.. I think I'll take my dollar right down to the local dark wank-in-the-back porn shop to show my outrage! (end sarcastic rant).

    Dude.. its their store. They can sell, or not sell, whatever the hell they want. If you dont like it, dont shop there, but dont act like its some crime against humanity that Wal-mart doesnt carry pimply faced teenager prot0-spank material at their registers anymore.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  15. Tried Walmart - NetFlix is much better... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I tried Walmart dvd rentals a few months back the selection seemed about the same as NetFlix, but the quantity wasn't there. Just about every title I wanted to rent was a 'long wait', whereas on NetFlix very few titles have any wait whatsoever.

    Walmart needs to get a greater quantity of titles before they steal significant market from NetFlix. I would also like to see Walmart enable returns/check-ins at stores (stores could bulk-main discs back to distribution sites).

    --
  16. Hidden Charges from WalMart by Mr.Gibs · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, they aren't exactly hidden, but the Walmart site states that you have to pay almost $18 for any CD that is lost by either you or the post office.

    I currently subscribe to Netflix, and at the rate they are either lost or stolen while in route back to the Netflix warehouse, I wouldn't want to be paying that for each one! Netflix has yet to charge me for those and state they won't unless it becomes frequent.

    Anyway, I'll be sticking to Netflix...

    --
    I live to gib...
  17. OT, I know. (Re:Maybe not such bad news ) by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Netflix at least has a fighting chance, Netscape didn't.

    Hard, though, to have sympathy for a company that nicknamed their product "Mosaic Killer", AKA Mozilla.

    Microsoft may have fscked a number of companies, but anyone entering a market where people are already giving away their product should not be surprised when somebody else comes in and gives away their product.

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  18. I forsee many copies of... by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

    'Deliverance' and 'Hee-Haw's Greatest Moments'

  19. propane tanks by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That "walmart only, propietary" deal happend to me with a couple of my small refillable propane tanks. I got two from walmart, turns out they put a "walmart_only_ thread on the filler valve, you are forced to get filler-ups/exchanges only at walmart then, unlike my other ones that I can take anyplace handy.

    I didn't mind walmart when sam walton was still kicking, it seemed like they at least made an effort to have "made in USA" stuff in abundance, and didn't have weird polices like this propane deal (and what they will probably do with DVDs-good call there), but now,since he's died and who knows who is running it as an economic division of the chinese peoples liberation army, I've about almost completely removed them from sucking on my wallet. Once in a great while I get stuck, and have no recourse but to go in there, and every time I see aisle after aisle of lost homes, lost jobs, lost equity, lost cars, basically a lot of lost hopes and dreams disgusied as cheap trinkets, like what were used to purchase manhattan island. Trinkets, ohhh shiny and cheap.

    They are that-cheap. Cheap as in price, cheap as in quality, but very expensive with a bigger look at when once those dollars leave the shores of the US and cease acting as an economic force multiplier.