Slashdot Mirror


Storing Pictures While Backpack Travelling?

Amgine007 asks: "A friend of mine will be leaving in January 2004 for a 12-to-18-month 'around the world' trip. He's pretty technically saavy, but not really much of a computer-and-gadgets geek. He has an interesting problem: How do you live out of a backpack for a year (or more) and manage to take and save a lot of digital pictures (say 10,000), if you will have very few connections to the outside world -- few sources of power (at the odd hostel or train station outlet), no internet, and no USB?"

"He hasn't yet purchased a digital camera, so any camera or convergence device to be available in the next 6 months is fair game.

We've thought of a few scenarios. Bringing along a ton of CF cards is neither cheap nor reliable -- suppose the media gets lost or damaged. An ideal solution might involve being able to mail media home, while still having a copy 'on the road' in case that media gets lost in the mail.

And isn't it about time we see consumer devices with support for firewire drives, such as the iPod? I envision a digital camera that can talk (and backup) to an iPod -- this would be more than enough storage in a 15gb model, and small enough to take backpacking painlessly. However, the new models feature a proprietary dock connector, which makes one the iPod's old great advantages -- charge from any firewire port! -- a thing of the past.

A camera that burns images to a CD would be nice, but only if the CD was secondary storage -- ie, save pictures to internal buffer, burn to N CDs, erase internal buffer. This would allow the easy creation of duplicates, but might require a lot of CDs.

How would you plan your gadgets, given 6 more months of advancement of new technology (and price-cuts on old tech)? There's a whole lot of neat camera-ready devices coming about about now, so there could be quite a few creative ideas. Winning solution is the simplest and most portable."

134 comments

  1. Stand Alone Data Storage - oh the power of google by malakai · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a list of DIGITAL CAMERA ACC-Stand Alone Data Storage devices from B&H.

    You don't want firewall, most cameras do the USB 2.0 thing.

    In addition to storing pictures, many of these Devices are MP3 players as well. 10,20,30 even 60 gig drives with rechargable batteries..etc.

    have fun.

    -malakai

  2. Don't discount CF cards quite yet by Exocet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem with stuff that is "just about ready to come out" is that you never know the quality or durability of something that has just come out. Going with an established product, especially when your friend will be away from civilization for considerable stretches of time, is what I recommend.

    While buying a lot of CF cards is not a great solution, it doesn't have to be too expensive. 10 256MB Sandisk CF cards will run you approx $650. That would store approximately 3500-4000 images - based on how I use my Canon Powershot A40 camera in "Fine" (medium lossy) format.

    10,000 images is, in my opinion, somewhat unlikely to occur. Sure, you can take 10,000 pictures. But 9,000 of them are probably going to suck. Maybe just 8,000. Thus the bane and beauty of a digital camera. You can instantly review a picture or simply review the whole lot later, on your down time. Backpacking should have it's share of down time, unless he's pushing pretty hard.

    Additionally, CF cards are very, very hardy. My 64MB Sandisk CF card spent 30 minutes at the bottom of a river when I dropped my camera. The card - and pictures - were perfectly ok after recovery.

    Your friend will also want to pick up some hearty rechargable batteries - I suggest the new PowerEX 2000mAh NiMH batteries in conjunction with the Maha C401FS rapid, 100-minute charger. Your friend may also want to consider picking up a flexible solar panel to charge stuff while "on the road".

    Lastly, camera-wise, I personally recommend the Canon Powershot A40. It can be had for about $200 now. It is "just" a 2 megapixel camera. However, the output is very nice for consumer level camera.

    --
    Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
    1. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 4, Informative

      TechTV tested a few different types of cards. They dropped them in water, lit them on fire, and even ran over them with a truck. Most types stopped working after getting soaked or fried, but the compact flash card still worked...that is, until they ran it over with a 1 ton truck.

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
    2. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I can second the a40. I have one and it does a GREAT job. very standards oriented. CF2 cards just plain work everywhere. and it takes regular AA batteries!!! yes! very very important. long life with NiMH and you can always find AA batts. not true with $50 special custom little jobbies.

      for snapshots the A40 is great. its manual modes aren't super but for that you really DO need a real pro camera (I use the nikon D1 and while its very flexible for my needs, for situations when weight and size is an issue (and batts), it stays home and the A40 comes with me).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by andrewski · · Score: 1

      I just returned from a trip into the woods (just an overnighter) and was able to take around 150 Large/Fine JPEGS (3kx2k pixels) and review them in the tent while it rained that night!

      I would recommend an SLR for any kind of future investment value. The EOS D30, a 4 MP camera IIRC, can be had for 300-400 bucks on eBay. With the BG-ED3, and miserly battery usage (no instant preview, 1 minute auto-sleep, minimum of metering and autofocusing) one could shoot for at least a week. The beauty of the digicam is the price - the one-time investment (not counting lens fever) lets you become a better photographer through shooting more pictures!

      Personally, I recommend the Powerbook, the 10D, and any of the myriad of well-constructed portable photocells if you plan to spend any time in the backcountry (adding perhaps 13-15 pounds to your load) for sustainable imaging on the road.

      What we really need is a Firewire / USB hard drive / cd-rom burner. One could be put into a Discman-sized package quite easily nowadays, and you only need to buy and mail CD's when you reache civilization, and eschew them in favor of the hard drive in the backcountry.

    4. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by matt_wilts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A colleague of mine found a Fuji Finepix in a river in Wales last year. Whilst the camera was damaged beyond repair, the smartmedia card was fine. According to the pictures the camera had been in the water for 3 months.

    5. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any "fun" pictures? <:-)

    6. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Lastly, camera-wise, I personally recommend the Canon Powershot A40. It can be had for about $200 now. It is "just" a 2 megapixel camera. However, the output is very nice for consumer level camera.

      The Canon A70 just dropped to $300. It's 3MP and quite nice. Personally, I decided to get a Nikon Coolpix 3100 since I'm a geek just not a photo geek. It uses CF cards, like the Canon, and offers many nice automatic modes...yet, if you like to tell your camera what to do instead of it figuring it out for you, the Canon A70 is a good choice. Now, try and find one!

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    7. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by Exocet · · Score: 1

      The reason I didn't suggest the A70 was because I don't like how it feels. Too small, too light.

      However, the A20, 40, 60 and A70 (all the ones I've ever touched/played with) all have a 100% manual mode. IE, you are welcome to screw up your picture as much (or as little) as you want. Set the film sensitivity (ISO), speed, f-stop, etc. You can even shoot in b&w.

      I do, however, agree with you on the Coolpix selection. I think it's a stupid name for a camera, but they're good cameras. However, your 3100 is not THAT much better than the A40/A70. Compare on dpreview.com. Still, either camera (imo) would be pretty good for a backpacking trip.

      BTW, a guy I know has the 5700 and loves it. He picked his up for about $800-850 I believe.

      --
      Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
    8. Re:Don't discount CF cards quite yet by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Coolpix: Agreed, dumb name.

      The 3100 is similar in many ways to the A70. I don't think either is superior to the other, though there are differences. For me, a non-photo geek, the Nikon was the better choice. For a real avid photographer, the A70 with it's extensive manual controls is a better choice.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  3. What resolution? by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually a lot of it depends on the resolution he wants to capture. At a fairly low resolution (640x480, encoded as average quality .jpg files) he could capture 8,000 pictures on a single 512M CF card. Even 1MP high quality .jpg files from my Kodak DC210+ (fairly older 1MegaPixel camera) run about 200k per picture, so with four 512M CF cards he would still be able to capture 10,000 pictures of with this camera set to max quality.

    512M CF cards cost +/- $100 apiece, maybe a little more, so he could hold 10,000 one megapixel pictures on about $500 in media. CF seems pretty indestructable, if he keeps it on his person (in his pocket or whatever) I guarantee it will survive way more than he can. He can also get a cheap $20 adapter to pop the CF card into a PCMCIA slot on a laptop, so with even a little luck he will find someone with a laptop that can burn him CDs for a couple of dollars, somewhere in his travels.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:What resolution? by Myrthe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      quoth the poster:
      so with even a little luck he will find someone with a laptop that can burn him CDs for a couple of dollars, somewhere in his travels.
      Or he can offer a couple of choice pictures and the story behind them. I'd much prefer that to a couple of dollars.
  4. MicroDrive by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pick up a couple of MicroDrives. These are the ~1GB hard drives that fit in some CF slots. Drop one in the mail every few weeks to you or someone, and be done with it.

    There's also the possiblity of using a film camera. Film should be available everywhere, and it's much safer to mail back home. Digital isn't always the answer (OTOH, I just bought my first digital camera today:)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:MicroDrive by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      There's also the possiblity of using a film camera.

      There is? At 24 pics per roll, that's gonna be over 400 rolls of film. That's gonna cost a whole bunch - and developing's gonna run somewhere around $4 per roll... that's another $1600 there.

    2. Re:MicroDrive by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      But like I said, the benefit of the film camera is the ability to buy film nearly anywhere. Any solution he picks is going to be expensive. But you don't drop out of the world/life for 1 year+ without having some money set aside.

      In any event, it's a possibility worth considering.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:MicroDrive by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Yep, and guess what happens when it goes through the X-ray machine at customs?

      Bingo.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:MicroDrive by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      Guess what happens to someone bringing 400 rolls of film through Customs?

    5. Re:MicroDrive by andrewski · · Score: 1

      No. Use CF RAM cards as they have considerably faster write speeds AND use far less power (no spinning platters or moving heads). Microdrives are sweet in the gee-whiz category, but I don't want one whittling my battery down like crazy.

    6. Re:MicroDrive by u38cg · · Score: 1
      errm...they say, "Hi, I've been travelling rounbd the world for the last six months. I have about 400 films here, which I'd appreciate you not X-raying?"

      Did I get it right?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:MicroDrive by anotherone · · Score: 1

      uh... what? (the answer: nothing)

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
  5. Mavicas and hard drives oh my by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

    What about one of the sony mavicas that does burn to mini CDs?

    There are devices just for sucking the pictures of a CF card and storing them on internal harddrive, some even with screens larger than the cameras for viewing and some even play mp3s as well.

  6. Good point by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    -Sure, you can take 10,000 pictures. But 9,000 of them are probably going to suck.

    Actually this is the best part about digital photography. Want a good picture? Take ten pictures of the subject and then pick the one(s) you like the best. With regular cameras this just isn't cost (or time) effective as you have to wait for prints, then wait for reprints, etc... but on a digital you can pop the CF card into your laptop to view the series and pick the good ones, then delete the stuff you do not like - doing this a few times throughout the trip will help reclaim 80% of the CF capacity if necessary. Of course if you have access to a laptop with a CDR, burn the entire CF off to CD and send it home in a mailer, make another copy for your backpack.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Good point by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Professional photographers (fashion, national geographic, news, Life) get one good picture out of 36 exposures, at best.

    2. Re:Good point by Exocet · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong - I agree completely on this point. My personal ratio is about 10:1. That is, 10 "ehhhh" pictures to one that I deem "good enough" or occasionally great.

      The cost of film and developing makes this practice all but impossible for the normal person. If you're a geek with cash and you feel like blowing it on film, well, go ahead.

      --
      Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
  7. 512 mb CF cards by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    errm... yeah. with a 1 megapixel digital camera, i get roughly 146 pictures/32 meg card, so if you have a 2 megapixel camera (standard these days).... 10 512meg CF cards will get you about 11000 photos, and weigh less than a 1/4 of a lb. Huzzah. Just kinda costly. But that's life.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  8. Meta-advice by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Depending on just how serious you are about being without power for that long a period you may really need to consider an all-out power consumption analysis, as well as other more conventional factors.

    One thing that I really noticed was your thought about writing CDs, which consumes a non-trivial amount of battery power.

    I personally know almost nothing about how much power it takes to take one picture, or write 256MB onto a compact flash, or run a laptop, but you might need to find out. Batteries are heavy and basically dead weight (no value beyond their storage capacity), so you will want to minimize what you need to carry. Coming up with a fancy solution that requires thirty pounds of batteries to run for a week without contact with civilization is probably not useful. Also, you may get into trouble if you need fifty hours to recharge your battery set. ;-)

    Just a meta-thought.

    1. Re:Meta-advice by jonadab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Depending on just how serious you are about being without power

      Exactly. Is your friend going to England and France, Mexico and
      China, or Bangledesh and the Cameroun? Urban, or rural? Are we
      talking about being without power during the day and sometimes for
      2-3 days because not _all_ of the hotels have power, or are we
      talking about being sixty miles (on nothing that we would consider
      to be roads in any North-American sense of that word) from the
      nearest place that has power certain days of the week, except when
      doesn't work when it's supposed to?

      Regarding sending things back: are we talking about Europe,
      where you can always get to a phone line within two days (usually
      much more easily than that) and there's fairly reliable postal
      service in nearly every country? Or is he going to South America,
      where the mail service is abysmal, or Africa where (in large areas)
      there are no phone lines? "Around the world" covers a lot of
      territory. The difference between Paris and Abong Mbong is
      the difference between "make sure the recharger can handle 220/50
      current" and "buy solar".

      Also bear in mind that outside of North America, what power you get
      is unlikely to be 110-120 volts at 60 Hertz. Anything you get MUST
      be able to run on 50-Hertz current anywhere from 100-250 volts, and
      it may not exactly (ahem) be a smooth sine wave either. Either that
      or batteries.

      If you're going to the third world, I suggest either solar, or
      stuff that runs entirely on flashlight batteries (a common size,
      not smaller than AA, not larger than D, and not obscure like B),
      since you can go weeks without seeing power in some areas. And
      carry a couple spare sets of batteries all the time, because
      sometimes you may not be able to buy them on short notice. Bonus
      points if it uses rechargeable batteries and you have a solar
      recharger. In that case, take three sets of batteries (one that
      is in the device, one that is recharged and ready, and one that
      is in the recharger).

      If you're going to only first and second world nations and the
      occasional breif stop in a major metropolis in the third world,
      you can probably get away with equipment that charges from either
      110 or 220 volts, provided it can handle 50-Hertz current -- which
      you must not take for granted; a lot of stuff you buy in the US
      will fry on 50-Hertz current, or at least not work properly. And
      you don't want to carry around a converter, because it will be
      heavy. (To convert the cycle, you actually have to convert to DC
      and back, so the equimpent that does it contains an inverter and
      therefore has significant mass. Not for backpacking.)

      One other thing, should be obvious: get a camera that lets you
      preview your pictures and delete some you don't want (to make room
      on your current storage whatsit) so that you don't have to wait
      to get back to a place where you can use your laptop/whatever
      before consolidating. You will want to take at *least* two of
      every picture you want and keep the better one. At home you
      would keep them all until you get back to your PC at least, but
      on the road you may need the space for other pics then and there.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Meta-advice by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Depending on just how serious you are about being without power for that long a period you may really need to consider an all-out power consumption analysis, as well as other more conventional factors.

      Agreed. My experience on a recent trip to Iceland was that my Sony Stamina(tm) battery ran out before my Sony Memory Stick(tm) in my Sony Camera(tm).

      Of course, "living off the land" counts for tech too. If he can just buy new storage on the way, he can just pop the previous one out and Fedex it home.

  9. Backwater? by cgenman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our friends generally take their laptops with them, and send files back when they get near places with ISP's or hotspots. Of course, they work while they are out, so the option of carrying a laptop might not appeal to him.

    You'd be surprised how backwater most of the world isn't. Power may not be guarenteed, but he should find something wherever he finds somewhere to sleep. Likewise, as most people out there don't have their own computers, there are likely to be affordable internet cafes he will bump into. He should use these as an opportunity to back up his data to a server you are monitering.

    On the flip side, mail is *never* a good idea. It might make it, it might not. Usually it doesn't.

    Technologically, USB 2.1 devices should be out soon, which allow for device-to-device communication. Unfortunately, firewire and USB 1.0/2.0 are both client-server models... Which is the server, the camera or MP3 player? Which charges which?

    Likewise, Sony makes a Mini-CDR burning camera, but they're just huge. 100 Mini CDR's can be had at Microcenter for 40 bucks, though, and should be enough space for 10,000 images. If he was intending to take a 5MP SLR with 14x optical zoom anyway, this might be a good option.

    HDD external storage is a bit risky because of the dangers to the device, but it may be your best option. Just remember to backup whenever you bump into an internet cafe.

    One last thing: Battery life. If he's genuinely worried about the availability of power, he should consider making a custom battery pack based on AA rechargables. That way, if the only place around is a convienience/gas station he can still power up his machine.

  10. Terapin Mine by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Informative
    the Terapin Mine has 10gb of space that you can store to with your digital camera (also has tons of other ports)

    with an ethernet connection (using built in port) or a pcmcia modem you could email your pictures back home whenever you can find a convienient connection. Also backs up to windows and linux and can play movies/music with its built in output ports.

    All of this in a 7x3.2x1" package

    --
    Bottles.
    1. Re:Terapin Mine by Amgine007 · · Score: 1

      This looks like an excellent direct camera-to-mass-storage device that I was thinking of. Thanks!

    2. Re:Terapin Mine by Myself · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of other "media vault" style devices, many of which use 1.8" drives instead of 2.5" like the Mine. They're single-purpose devices, with a button that simply copies the flash into a directory on the drive, and blinks when it's finished.

      The Mine is much more than just camera-to-storage. It's got Ethernet, USB master, USB slave, AV output, and a PCMCIA slot. It's also not too great on the batteries, so you might want to carry a solar panel.

      I'm not sure if all revisions of the Mine include this little undocumented feature, but my friend's model has a jumper which allows it to charge the batteries in its compartment, when connected to external power.

  11. Easy solution by Feztaa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's this amazing new technology that have been called 'optical cameras'. The idea is an interesting one: a lense refracts light onto a piece of photosensitive material known as "film". This film can then be developed into regular pictures, with qualities far surpassing any of their digital counterparts.

    In other words, get an optical camera, and mail the film to yourself. Have it developed when you get home.

    1. Re:Easy solution by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      film does a BAD job in hot weather. digital doesn't. film shifts colors, digital doesn't. film expires, digital doesn't. film requires you load it, and in bad weather or wind or dust, you get nasty stuff inside your camera; digital doesn't.

      I shoot film when I need to. but NEVER in harsh conditions like the poster is likely to encounter.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Easy solution by ArsonPerBuilding · · Score: 1

      Woah..slow down there. Digital film doesn't expire? You haven't heard about the latest Microsoft DRM scheme have you? You must have your pictures developed at their approved stores or you'll end up with a bunch of expired pictures.

      --
      1 tequila 2 tequila 3 tequila floor
    3. Re:Easy solution by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the 'digital film' that I use is dos fat32 formatted CF cards. aint no os shiat there to get in the way. and the files are regular .jpg.

      I'd say there are far more cameras that follow the above style than the one you describe.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Easy solution by finity · · Score: 1

      His post was funny. A joke.

    5. Re:Easy solution by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      damn, I missed that.

      however, its not THAT farfetched a thing to imagine - the scene he describes. which is why it wasn't immediately obvious that he was trying to poke fun.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:Easy solution by ArsonPerBuilding · · Score: 1

      Funny yet serious at the same time and I didn't know it...go figure. Yes, I was joking, but wouldn't be too terribly surprised if Microsoft tried to DRM digital cameras.

      --
      1 tequila 2 tequila 3 tequila floor
  12. regular film camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about a regular film camera?

    You can buy film just about anywhere and get it developed anywhere. It's small and inexpensive.

    Of course there's no sense getting it developed right away so you can (easily) mail it back home for safe keeping. If you do send it back home, make sure it's put in a fridge or freezer: it helps preserve the chemicals and keeps it good longer.

    Before you take it to the film shop, let it sit for a day to get it back to room temperature. Also, when you get it developed, you may want to ask them not to cut the negatives (keep it as one long strip). This will make it easier for you to scan the negatives: less feeding of the short strips.

    Go with 35mm and not APS! APS is more expensive, may not be as accessible, and (in general) has lower quality.

    35mm has been around for several decades and everyone knows how to handle it. You can even develope your own film with 35mm (mostly B&W, not as much with colour).

    1. Re:regular film camera by JET+666 · · Score: 1

      don't put opened film in the fridge(or freezer) condensation on film sucks.

      --
      De sig boss de sig
    2. Re:regular film camera by funky+womble · · Score: 1
      Before you take it to the film shop, let it sit for a day to get it back to room temperature. Also, when you get it developed, you may want to ask them not to cut the negatives (keep it as one long strip). This will make it easier for you to scan the negatives: less feeding of the short strips.
      It's probably better to send developed film. It's difficult enough to avoid having hand-carried film xrayed, if you are mailing to countries with strict checking for agricultural or terrorist materials this is pretty much unavoidable through the post. You don't have to get prints made (although, this may be a good idea if you want to be sure there's a good shot of somewhere special before moving on). Although, poor quality prints don't necessarily mean the negative is bad - there are many additional variables affecting quality of prints which don't apply to developing.

      If the film is kept in a long strip for ease of scanning / later printing, probably the best way to transport it is (carefully :-) wound onto a spool in the original case.

      There's a lot to be said for a compact film camera... 'photo-snobs' might look down on them but in many ways they are a lot better for travel than an SLR. Although there are times you'll want a longer lens, there will probably be plenty more times you wish you had something smaller - lots of days you really won't want to lug a full setup with you, and mightn't feel totally happy about leaving it in accommodation. There are good compacts around (maybe investigate some of the Ricoh range, the GR look like a potential candidate for a nice travel camera if you like wide-angle lenses, some have optional manual focus too, rather unusual for a compact).

      Having tried various types of camera I'd much prefer film over digital for travel - no LCD presenting a large, highly-breakable fragile area - no *highly* visible backlight, which draws a lot more attention to you - vastly reduced battery worries (but if you do go for a digital, something that can be run or at very least recharged from AA cells is a great idea) - etc....

      I do also get the impression that digital cameras encourage people to spend more time taking pictures hoping they'll get something 'just right'. Shoot, review, shoot, review, but really it doesn't matter, it's not important (-: You definitely don't want to miss out on what's going on around you just for the sake of photographs...

      A few general tips, obviously this will not be the same for all travellers, but generally ... you *don't* need a big bag ... 35-45 litre or so is probably a good compromise (and usually still able to fit under benches, tables in cafes, etc, which you'll probably find useful), maybe you'll want a little more if you're travelling around somewhere really cold (rather than going there and staying put for a while - in which case buy warm things there!). If you don't need something on further legs of the trip - leave it there or trade it!

      I really don't think it would be good to be one of the rather-too-many people struggling with a full 60-70 litre pack. In a busy bus-station. In rush hour. Somewhere ReallyFsckingHot. Etc. Cut down on bulk and weight. If in doubt, leave it at home, if it's important you'll be able to buy it on the way anyway (and it'll probably be more suitable for where you're staying, too - especially e.g. clothing). Cut down on hassly/fiddly things. Most important, have fun, oh and ermmm, if you're from the US, please at least *try* not to be too loud! (-:

      Take a look at Edward Hasbrouck's tips for travellers page too...

  13. Jesus, where are you travelling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite what most Americans think, you can find electricity in other countries. We even have access to the internet and CD writers. Then you can burn a CD or two of your photos and reuse the flash card.

  14. X's drive by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

    found on compgeeks:

    X's drive

    the usb2.0 version works well with linux. the usb1.1 version doesn't (for me, at least).

    put any size notebook drive in there you want.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  15. Stand alone CD Burner by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

    I don't have the link, but I have seen stand alone CD-Burners that will burn the contents of a memory card onto a CD. He could just get a 512MB card, take pics... burn onto a CD and send home.

    I also found this device when poking around http://www.gus.com/buphbadicapo.html

    Also, what about USB-on-the-Go ? Isn't it supposed to allow cameras to talk to hard drives? I've found some hard drives that are USB on the go. Do any cameras support this?

  16. Why digital? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Why do you have to take a digital camera? You're on a trip where you're deliberately avoiding the conveniences and comforts of a first-world lifestyle. Yet you want to drag along some very expensive, complicated, and high-maintenance technology along. Makes no sense.

    Don't get me wrong, I love digital imaging. Fun to browse, to share, to manipulate. But I don't own a digital camera. Way too expensive for the amount of photography I do. I own several conventional cameras, and I have the lab scan everything when I get the film developed. That makes a lot more sense for what you're doing. You can get an excellent point-and-shoot autofocus camera for $100. It will store hundreds of high-resolution images on rolls of film that will be OK for months, with minimal care (temperature, avoid X-rays).

    You might also consider an instant camera. The prints make excellent gifts for the people you meet. Scanning them in is a pain, but less so than losing all your images because your battery ran down or your backpack fell off the bus.

    Insisting that your images be end-to-end digital smacks of technology for its own sake.

  17. You've let technology cloud the issue. by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are approaching the problem from the wrong end. You are asking; how do you support this technology under less than ideal conditions? What you should be doing is asking; how do I keep 10,000 pictures while I am on the road for a year?

    The answer is low tech rather than high tech. First you need to get a good 35mm film camera. Stash 5 or ten rolls of film in your rucksack and have a good time. The next time you pass a post box, drop your exposed film in it, addressed to a friend or relative. When running low on film, pick some up in the next town. 35mm film is available in almost any town anywhere. It is also far cheaper than CF cards or self powered hard drives.

    When you return home, have the film developed at your local drug store, or where ever you prefer, and check the little box requesting a CD-ROM copy of the roll or rolls. This way you have the digital format that you desire as well as a quality film picture that would require a digital camera of at least 5 megapixels to get the same quality and resolution.

    This approach is also far safer from the perspective of protecting your pictures. It is entirely possible that, over the course of a year, your rucksack will be lost, abused, battered and especially soaked with rain. By regularly shipping out your pictures, the risk will only be to a few rolls of film rather than everything, as would be the case when a supersized CF card gets crushed or wet. Even if you lose the camera at some point it can be replaced with only the loss of a few rolls of film, rather than everything.

    1. Re:You've let technology cloud the issue. by damiam · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is also far cheaper than CF cards or self powered hard drives.

      It is? Film costs about $1.50 a roll at US retail, but it can cost much more in other places, especially tourist sites. We'll say the average price is $2.50, including tax and such. When you add in developing (around $4 per roll) and postage (I have no clue - international postage can be really expensive. I'll say $2 per roll), that's $8.50 per roll. Assuming these are 24-exposure rolls, 10000 exposures would cost about $3500.

      Meanwhile, 10000 pics on a good-quality digital (around 3MP) would take up about 4.8 GB (at 500k per frame). A 512MB CF card can be had for $100, and it would take about 10 of them to hold it all, yielding a final price of $1000. So the price of digital comes to less than 1/3 the price of film (plus, at the end, you still have $1000 worth of CF cards to do whatever you want with).

      Even those numbers are being quite generous, because 90% of the pictures people take (even pros) are shit. With digital, you can erase them and get back the space. Even if he only deleted 40% of his pictures, that would be enough to let him take the rest at 5MP instead of 3MP. Also, CF cards are quite rugged, and a little bit of rain won't hurt them. And, if he's really worried about losing pics, he can stop at a local Internet cafe every so often and burn a backup CD or upload them to a file server.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  18. Not so easy ! by Bazouel · · Score: 2, Informative

    A couple of facts you seem to ignore ...

    In some countries, mailing shouldn't be considered an option (Nepal, India, Africa, rural China, etc.)

    It is NEVER a good idea to mail something by regular post when you really care about it, unless you are 100 % sure it won't be lost somewhere and be kept in good condition (in other words, if you trust in miracle).

    Mail is scanned many times by all sort of rays, most notably X-Rays which can really screw you film if they are too powerful. You can wrap your films in aluminium paper, but then they might open the package or simply send it back (it happened to me once).

    Films degrade over time. So after one year or more, I guess his oldest films won't be as good as they were. You can refrigerate them to slow the process.

    Actually developping films is quite costly, especially if you want to get better prints for a number of particularly good photos. If he is serious about photography, I guess he won't go to local drugstore for that job !

    --
    Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
    1. Re:Not so easy ! by xutopia · · Score: 1

      If someone truly is serious about photography he's not doing digital.

    2. Re:Not so easy ! by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could just as easily say "If someone is truly serious about photography, he isn't doing 35mm." Or medium format. If you're not lugging an 8x10 camera everywhere, you aren't serious.

      Hint: welcome to the 21st century. There are serious digital cameras out there. They just cost a lot.

    3. Re:Not so easy ! by Taos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's all sorts of arguments on this issue. I traveled Europe last year in the manner that I expect the article is intending. Hostels? Bah, I slept in the park. Or a beach if it was available.

      Anyways, as a high level amateur photographer, I took 3 cameras with me. 1 Fuji digital, 1 Olympus OM-1, 1 Nikon F (The original, built like a tank, when you're not taking pictures, you can use it as a weapon in a bull fight). Guess which one didn't make it back? The Nikon. I fell in an irrigation ditch in rural Italy and broke the viewfinder and shutter speed dial. I could have used that camera as a weapon later on in my journey too.

      Anyways, my point. They all have their advantages. Using digital (and I would have loved a pro digital outfit on the trip) you get an immediate response of what the final image is doing. However, I like to do a lot of high-speed/low-light situations, and most digital (even the high end) can't handle what I like to do with 3200 speed T-Max.

      My suggestion: If he's serious about pictures, take both, and take extras. Get used to buying film along the route so it doesn't age in your pack before you expose it. Mail it back, *after processing it*, when you're in a reasonably sized and responsible city.

      If all you're doing is taking snapshots, I highly reccomend digital, and as many CF cards (I'd go solid state, they're more durable than the microdrives). On rare occasion, you might find a hostel or internet cafe with a burner. Even better, I used a friends shell account that I could upload all my pictures to. Carry all your software with you so you can get the pictures off if you find a friendly computer somewhere.

      I'm paying close attention to this thread. I intend to do a 3-4 month journey through South America in a couple years, and will be looking to take two cameras with me. Most likely a digital and a film, both probably nikons.

    4. Re:Not so easy ! by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Not really. The EOS 1Ds and the Kodak DCS14 or whatever their new '14' megapixel interpolated images both give 4x5 a serious run for their money.

    5. Re:Not so easy ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

  19. 1GB CF cards by cgenman · · Score: 1

    You can get 1GB cards on yahoo shopping from SanDisk for about 200 dollars. I wouldn't recommend going with less than 4MP, but even then you can get a thousand pictures on one 1GB CF card for 200 bucks. (as opposed to a thousand pictures on 2 512 MB CF cards for 200 bucks.)

    On the other hand, if your friend has never had a digital camera before, he may be shocked at how many pictures he will be taking. By my calculations, I have taken over 2,000 since December, and I have a job other than wandering around taking photographs. With 4MP Elph and lots, and lots, of free time, 11,000 might not be enough.

    Just make him edit the shots before he shows you the slideshow.

    1. Re:1GB CF cards by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      yeah i have about 800 pictures taken in the last 9 months. Are they making 1 GB CF cards, or are the SanDisk cards just IBM microdrives in disguise? if the latter, I would go with the 2 512 over a single 1 GB as true CF cards have no moving parts. Secondly, I don't believe all devices are capable of reading CF cards in excess of 512 MB, although with what he's doing, his camera probably supports 1 GB+ CF cards.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:1GB CF cards by cgenman · · Score: 1

      They're solid state, not microdrives. I'd be surprised if a camera purchased in the next six months wouldn't support it (CF is notoriously compatible). I believe the incompatibility can come from the difference between CF type 1 and type 2. Microdrives and attachments are type 2, while nearly all solid-state CF cards are type 1.

      Here's one.

      I think many people here aren't recommending 1GB CF cards because pricewatch.com doesn't go that high yet.

    3. Re:1GB CF cards by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing that up, that's some pretty slick technology. Until you brought the 1 GB CF cards, I didn't know they existed, either. I've read that the higher capacity CF cards use more battery juice than the lower capacity cards. I haven't noticed this, but then again I haven't used the 4 MB CF card that came with the camera in about 2 years (as opposed to the newer 32 MB card).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:1GB CF cards by pbox · · Score: 1

      Actually CF Cards go upt to 4GB now. Right now 0.5 and 1 GB cards are at the size vs. price sweetpoint. Incompatibility comes from the fact that the 2GB and bigger cards need to be formatted FAT32. Only the newer cameras can handle that. FAT16 cannot go to 2GB (remember when the harddisks went through this same exact phase 4-5 years ago?)

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
  20. My Solution- real and possible by RevAaron · · Score: 1

    I will be going on a 2 week trip to Europe next month, living out of a backpack. We have 2x128 MB CF cards for the camera, but those wouldn't hold all of the photos we plan on taking during the trip.

    My solution? I happen to have a Jornada 720 PDA and a 2 GB PCMCIA drive for the machine. The plan is when a 128 MB card if filled up, to move the contents onto the 2 GB drive. The PCMCIA harddrives are the same as in the iPod. You can get them in sizes ranging from 2 GB (a measly $70) all the way up to 30 GB (around $450). The PDA itself can be had for $300-450, depending on some factors. However, this was a good solution because I already had the hardware- it doesn't seem like a good idea for someone starting from scratch.

    But then again, spending $350 on the J720 and then $70 on the 2 GB PCMCIA drive makes a lot more sense than buying $650 (!!) worth of SD/CF cards as someone else recommended as being a reasonable solution. At a decent quality, this 2 GB PCMCIA drive holds at least 10k images. I plan on recharging while at hostels and the occasional hotel. I am considering getting a solar panel as well, but I've not yet decided.

    Would be great for journaling on the trip as well- I know I'd like to document all of my adventures and thoughts if I were taking a trip around the whole world!

    This is *much* cheaper than the same space in a IBM CF MicroDrive, CF or SD cards.

    ---

    The other option that may make sense is buying a camera that uses media like mini-CD-R discs. My uncle has a fancy Sony digital camera that burns the photos he takes on to the 3" CD-R disks. It was an expensive camera, but it takes awesome photos and wouldn't require a computer or a slew of expensive media like SD or CF cards.

    I just looked it up, and you can get them cheaper than before. I remember my uncle paying $1000 for his fancy-pants CD-R burning Mavica, but it looks like you can get a camera which does that now for quite a bit cheaper.

    The $500 MVC-CD350 and the $700 MVC-CD500 look like decent models. Definately seems to make more sense to pick up one of these rather than buying $700 worth in SD/CF media!

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  21. buy used, get the right pack, use hostel's by 2TecTom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When travelling, I've found it best to make extensive use of the IYH network. ( International Youth Hostels ~ www.iyhf.org ) They often have Internet access and they often have the most practical and reasonable accomadations. The fellow travellers that you'll meet at the communal kitchens are a wealth of info.

    Get a good travel pack, one that is both an internal frame pack and a suitcase with wheels. Pack light, get a money belt. Never display american money on the street if possible. Beware of black market money changers. If you buy soveniers, ship them home from the country of origin. It's best to check your passport into the embassy in some countries.

    As for photos, don't buy a brand new spiff camera or other flashy equipment. It's far, far better not to display any signs of affluence. You'll encounter far less problems if you dress locally (trade at used clothing stores) and blend in. You're need a good universal current adapter kit and consider web email account as the most reliable way to get the pictures home. Internet cafes abound and there's always someone who has a fairly new pc or laptop somewhere. Also try searching thru or posting to the relevant newsgroups, many travellers and professional photographers have discussed these concerns in great detail.

    One last, somewhat strange piece of advice, you may also want to sew a small Canadian flag to your pack. I've had far less problems since I did.

    Main rule: get down, get local, that's where it's at. Happy trails.

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  22. Someone probably beat me to it, but by Stigmata669 · · Score: 1

    Sony makes a series of Mavica digital cameras that write pictures to mini cds (160ish mb). This appears to fit all the criteria of your request but is pretty expensive and you still have to charge the battery, and I bet quite often because the cd burner must take some serious battery.

    --
    Yawn.
    1. Re:Someone probably beat me to it, but by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      180 megs, i think. chicks dig them, they think they're cute, and you get extra style-points for incorperating them as gifts.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  23. Get a film camera by ByronEllis · · Score: 1

    If you're actually going to be out of touch, like in outer Mongolia or something, go get a manual 35mm SLR. They don't need batteries at all and the bodies are virtually indestructible. Film is easy to carry, high quality, cheap and you can have it converted into slides when you like.

    If you're going to be "out of touch" in major metropolitan areas outside the US then don't sweat it---there are WAY more Internet Cafe's outside the U.S. and contrary to popular belief there is civilization in other countries... you know, power, hot and cold running water... that sort of thing.

  24. Vosonic X's Drive II by pr00f · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've picked up an X's Drive II and have to say it is one of the best devices for the on-the-go digital photographer. With sizes up to 60 GB, and six types of digital media readers built in, you can click away, transfer and go back to clicking away withing seconds. Highly recommended.

  25. Camcorders take pics to dvd,but what about battery by Tip · · Score: 1

    Some camcorders take up to 1,998 pictures to DVD. And some offer 1MegaPixel resolution. Like the Hitachi DZMV380A, Panasonic also has one, and Sony has one on the way. But battery life will be an issue. Of course I would think that would be a problem with a regular camera also. But since it records to DVD-RAM, you should be able to delete the ones you don't want to keep.

  26. Iomagic iDrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go here[iomagic.com] and look for the iDrive portable hard drive. My dad got one and it seemed to work pretty good. I tried it out, but itÂs about 20 gig, and USB 1.1, so looking at stuff can be slow. However, all you do is plug in your flash chip and the hard drive does all the copying for you.

    Anonymous cause IÂm too lazy to create an account.

  27. Thanks for the replies! by Amgine007 · · Score: 1

    Thank you all for the replies; good suggestions all around!

    One thing I neglected to mention is that part of the reason just 'mailing film' won't work is that this would be a digital operation -- hoping to get a few chances here and there to upload and describe images. Having a friend at home develop pictures would probably be more expensive than hanging on to a few CF cards or whatever..

    About the volume of the pictures: it is true that 10,000 might be on the high side! Perhaps 5000 is more like it. ANd regarding desired resolution, well, higher (>1024x768) is definitely better, because online photo places can make some lovely prints these days (for the odd good photo..)

    Cheers..

    1. Re:Thanks for the replies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're spending so much money on travel, it doesn't make sense to skimp on photo quality. You rarely know when you press the button that this will be the photo you want to blow up to poster size.

      My advice is

      (1) Buy a modern digital camera with at least 3.3M pixels, and use it at it's best JPG setting. RAW mode (if the camera has one) is great if you're a perfectionist, but in these circumstances overkill.
      (2) Use lots of memory cards. It is simple, very effective, and very compact.The Compact Flash (CF) storage format is probably cheapest per MB.
      (3) Choose a model that looks like a 35mm compact camera. It distracts thieves (somewhat), and makes you less conspicious in general (useful for more candid photography).
      (4) Realize that digital cameras require lots of energy, and plan for this. A backup battery (set) is essential, and you'll have to arrange for recharging some way or another.
      (5) You can reduce the required storage capacity by regularly reviewing pictures and deleting duds. However (a) NEVER, EVER, do this solely on what you see on the camera LCD. These displays are not good enough to give you a good impression of the picture. Reviewing on a TV or laptop is reasonably useful, but can also be misleading.
      (6) Practice with the camera before you travel.
      (7) Take a 35mm camera as backup.

      One good choice for a travel camera is the Canon S50 (or S45, S40, or even S30). Sturdy design, fairly light and compact, very good picture quality, reasonably cheap. Of course there are lots of good alternatives.

  28. Careful when you carry around expensive stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, when I did it, I carried my laptop along. Of course, this is not the best option if all you care about is taking pictures. It does help if you plan to keep a journal or are going to places where you can get it online from time to time.
    I'd also sugest leaving the expensive hardware you will not bring along all the time with you at an airport or train station vault if the place looks trustworthy. Better than just dropping it at the hostel's room you will be sharing with 6+ people you barely know.

  29. The trip and the Camera by tutkia.com · · Score: 1

    I have the same plans for May 2004 and I plan on covering over 17,000 miles. I asked a friend the same question, what is the best camera for my trip? Immediately he said the Sony DCR-TRV950 MiniDV Digital Camera. This camera is not only light weight but can record an hours worth of high quality video on a cheap medium and take countless numbers of digital photos. I seen this camera as low as $1449 USD from a place called cameratopis but they donâ(TM)t have a web site, I think, only a number 1-718-837-7722. Though my trip also involves sleeping out of a tent the entire time I have been shopping around for the best at a low cost. I am going to buy this camera next year some time after xmas and hoping the price will be around $800. I do not recommend media mail when shipping your tapes since media mail is the last class of mail to be sorted. I sold books on half.com for a while and found it to be a pain in the ass. Just spend the money to ensure a safe trip home for your tapes. Since the tapes are cheap I plan on buying a lot along the way. The digital pictures are saved on a memory stick. I also tried to figure out how to save a shit load to a disk of some kind. I seen a 2 Giga bite flash memory stick for 2 grand but Iâ(TM)d rather buy a http://www.panasonic.com/toughbook/ In the end I most likely will buy a bunch of MiniDVs and two 64 megabite memory sticks. Where Is your friend traveling to? Does the name Alby Mangels mean anything to him? -Terry inbox@tutkia.com

  30. 256MB Smart Media by aminorex · · Score: 1

    This little card weighs about as much as a
    paperclip and is about half as thick as a dime.
    Carry a little USB adapter, and hit an Internet
    cafe once every 3 months. You can store about
    550 1600x1200 photos on one card. If you take
    1000 photos per month, that's just 6 cards to
    carry, which will weigh less than half an ounce
    and take about 1cc of space in your kit.

    Carrying around CDRs would be a pain. They are
    too wide and flat, and inflexible, and very
    likely to be destroyed -- not to mention the
    camera that weighs too much and is too big.

    If you really need to recharge your NiMH batteries
    away from "civilization", a solar panel rig would
    be quite feasible, but cost you about 2 kilos
    of luggage.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  31. I've travlled alot taking that many photos.... by Elivs · · Score: 1
    As someone who has travelled extensively through the "3rd world" and taken alot of photos I have some advice. I tend to take about 100-200 photos per week when travelling/backpacking. 10,000 in a year is alot (1 photo every 30 minutes of being awake) and I assume your friend is like as snap happy as me. (my photos are here)

    The advise is simple. Don't use digital

    Film gives you better photos, is easier to carry and the practicallities of using it while abroad are simplier. The cameras and the storage are more robust for film. Then, get the negatives scanned when you get home. I do have a digital, but its a fun camera, not for good photos. I don't bother taking it away with me.

    You can now get some good digital cameras. (eg the Nikon D100) but I believe they are still a few years away from replacing film for most professional or keen amatures. The D100 does allow you to use a micro drive, so storage is less of an issue. This is one of the few cameras on the market that is close to a what cheap film SLR will give you in term of picture qaulity.

    However... remember where you are going, how you are travelling, and what you'll be taking photos of.

    Generally I've found that alot of photos I've taken have been of moving objects, dusk, or other difficult subjects. A good SLR is preferable, but a point'n'click for use in markets, train stations etc etc is also usefull. Your pushing the limits of the CCD in these conditions.

    Drawbacks to digital are:
    1) Theft: While most of the world has a lower crime rate than New York a 3000 USD camera can be more than a years income for your subject, hotel owner, or fellow hotel guest. Laptops are similar Don't be a target!!!
    2) Repairs: Alot of the places I've taken pictures a have been deserts, montain tops, dusty streets. If your away for a few months who do you get to service you camera? With film cameras getting them serviced is easy in many remote locations. Mechanical stuff is easy to service/clean. I have a friend who dropped his camera in a river in Nepal. The guy at the local village could clean the lens, dissassemable and dry/relubricate the camera. It he had a digital it would likely to be more difficult.
    3)Quality: Even the best digitals don't have the same speed as slow film. Often you want to take photos of moving objects, in low light, bright days. You need a camera/film comnb with a wide lattitude. Resolution and colour depth are also not as good on digital cameras as 35mm film.
    4) Storage: There is no issue with carrying dozens of films with you in your back pack. They don't take up much space, and are reasonably robust. They also fit into plastic bag to prvent rain damage, something that is harder to do with a laptop. You can post film from most big cities via DHL etc. Internet connections are expensive, unreliable, and slow in most of the places I been to. Great for email, but not for hundreds of images (?1-2G) it not practicle.

    My solutionis to take an SLR and a point'n'click and use film. When I get home I have the film scanned by the photo shop. Search around, there is a big range in quality of scanning. I pay 5 USD for 36exp at 9megapixels with 8bits depth per colour. Thats almost the most you can get from 35mm film, and its far better than even a good digital camera. Film is easy to carry and available everywhere.

    Despite being a geek I still recommend film for travelling.

    Elivs.

    1. Re:I've travlled alot taking that many photos.... by evalhalla · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I tend to take about 100-200 photos per week when travelling/backpacking. 10,000 in a year is alot (1 photo every 30 minutes of being awake)

      With a digital camera they're not that much: when I bought one i noticed that I took about twice as many pics as before, if not more. Usually when I'm on a short trip (1/2 days - no storage problems) I take about 50-100 pics per day, if I'm in a good place.

      Of course most of them are duplicates and when i'm home I select slight more than half of them for keeping, and maybe 3 or 4 for "public view", but I've found that the camera display is just too small to allow me to decide whether a shot is worth keeping or not.

      If you're traveling in first or second world countries, I would say go digital.

      1. Theft: is an issue both with digital and non digital, if you have an mid/high-level one, it is less if you have a low-level point and shot camera, but the only thing that probably won't be stolen is a one-use camera, and I won't suggest to use that.
      2. Repairs: go for a commonly available model, of a widespread brand, and you'll have good chances to find service for it in most mid sized towns.
      3. Quality: if all you want to do is show your pics to friends when you're back home, and have a couple shots printed (not in poster size) most digital cameras will suffice, if you want to sell your pics to magazines a point'n'click film camera won't do anyway
      4. Storage: to store 10000 pics at 1MB each (2Mpixel, hi-quality lossy compression) you only need 20 512MB CF, and they can be stored in a couple of those specific wallets, about 20x10x1cm big, in films they're about 415 ones, and they become quite bulky.

      Of course third world is a different matter, unless you're only traveling in big towns.

    2. Re:I've travlled alot taking that many photos.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10,000 images at 9 megapixels (presuming JPEGs) are gonna be about 200gigs (assuming 2megabytes per image). Thats a lot of CDRs. For most pictures 6 will be the most you'll want, 2 or 3 is fine in many cases.

    3. Re:I've travlled alot taking that many photos.... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      As someone who has travelled extensively through the "3rd world" and taken alot of photos I have some advice. I tend to take about 100-200 photos per week when travelling/backpacking. 10,000 in a year is alot (1 photo every 30 minutes of being awake) and I assume your friend is like as snap happy as me. (my photos are here) The advise is simple. Don't use digital

      Not many people posting to this thread seem to have ever traveled farther than their own backyards, so I'm piggybacking on your post as a fellow traveler.

      However I do disagree with your advice. I've found digital to work great when traveling.

      I've traveled more than most people, I think (4 continents, 15 countries in the past 6 months, similar rates for the previous 10 years, with occasional peaks and troughs). On the one hand it means I have a decent sense of what's out there in terms of technological facilities and so on. On the other hand it means I've developed near-institinctive behaviors that help me, but which may render my advice less than useful to a tyro backpacker.

      I find several key advantages to digital:

      • If I'm only going to be in Timbuktu one day in my life, I damn well want to make sure I got the shots before I get on the boat down to Mopti. With digital I can do that. With film it's anybody's guess, especially with tricky shots like long exposures that you can never be quite certain of until you see them.

      • It's an amazing conversation piece. You can get so many colorful people to pose for you simply in exchange for giving them a glimpse of themselves on that tiny little LCD screen. This works with kids, adults, everyone, including lots of people who were initially unreceptive to the idea of being in a picture but saw how much fun everyone else was having (you know the type, the old man with the crazy hat that would just be the PERFECT photo but he gives you a dirty look when you get out your camera and ask).

      • On a long trip, it's really nice to be able to send photos back to your friends and family, so they know what you're up to (and don't forget you exist!)

      • With digital, I can reliably duplicate my "negatives" so that I have virtually no risk of losing my photos.

      What do I bring? Not much. A robust CD wallet and a bunch of blanks. A small digital camera that uses a proprietary battery (charges faster). A spare battery. A 100-250V charger. An adapter that lets me add an electrical outlet to a light socket (very handy in developing countries where your hotel room often won't have an outlet). A handful of 128M CF cards at $35 apiece. Other than the CD wallet, it all takes up less space (and weight) than a single SLR with a fixed 35mm lens and no film. NO laptop (unless traveling for work). NO funky digital storage devices that mean I can lose everything in one fell swoop. NO CF cards that I can't be reasonably sure every little CD-burning shop will be able to read.

      The batteries take about an hour to charge, so I charge one at night (if there's electricity in my room) or at a restaurant, cafe, or whatever. It's fast and painless and has never been a problem since I got the light bulb adapter and the spare battery and discovered that no restauranteur on earth minds having you use one of their outlets while you eat.

      When I fill up the CF cards, I have them burned to a couple CDs (usually around $5 for the first and $2 for additional copies). I stick them in the wallet and when I get to somewhere that I trust the post office, I mail 1 copy of each one home.

      When I get to somewhere with decent bandwidth (anywhere in Europe, most places in Asia and the Middle East, many places in Latin America, a few places in Africa) I rsync the CDs to my machine. I keep cygwin+ssh+rsync on a floppy and in a directory on my web server (in case the floppy drives don't work or are taped up). With rsync I can leave the copy job running, abort it whenever I have to (internet cafe

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  32. Where is he traveling? by anticypher · · Score: 1

    if you will have very few connections to the outside world -- few sources of power (at the odd hostel or train station outlet), no internet, and no USB?

    Where is this mythical place he is traveling to? Antarctica? Northern Canada? A foot trip across the outback of Australia?

    Sounds like an American who has never been more than 50 miles from his hometown, and thinks the rest of the world has no electricity or internet cafes. There are a few wild and savage areas on this planet, but for the most part you can find electricity just about anywhere if you go looking for it, and the internet pops up in the most unexpected areas.

    Enough ranting.

    Get some of the new 1 and 2 Gig CF cards, and an assortment of 256Mb or 512Mb models. Buy a nice but not too top end camera which can support the 2Gig cards. Make sure the camera is purchased at least a few months before the trip starts, so the learning curve is well past before heading out. Take a few weekends to hike to a neighboring town, taking pictures along the way, and then figure out how to get the photos home without carrying them. Practice trips are a great way to discover how much shit accumulates in the backpack of inexperienced travelers, and how out of shape they are. Practice with the camera will allow for learning the optimum resolution needed for most photos, super hi res for amazing shots where details count, medium res for some shots, and low res for just day to day point and shoot, thanks for the memory pics.

    Typically, a traveler will take about 50 photos per day, or enough to fill a CF card in 5-10 days. So 2 or 3 big cards, and 8 to 10 smaller (cheaper) cards will suffice for a month or more. From time to time, take a day off from traveling and do all the administrivia needed, preferably in a good sized town or large city. Find an internet cafe and check email, phone loved ones with updates, write post cards, do laundry, eat a real meal or two, mail trinkets home, get a solid nights sleep, and transfer a bunch of photos home (which also keeps the family and friends happy). My rule is to spend at least two nights in a hotel(not a hostel), which gives a full day to run around with no backpack. (there is an upside to the occasional hotel, it allows you to shag the almost-cute-enough fellow traveler you met in the hostel or on the bus)

    There are several ways of getting the photos home, a combination of these is recommended.

    Email the photos to a waiting server (no free email services like $h*tmail). When photo attachments come into the mailbox, they get procmailed into a waiting directory with some PHP scripts to make web photo albums, and he can check from any browser they were received before deleting them from his media. Even poorly connected cyber cafes will eventually get the dozens of email messages out of their outbound queue, it may take them a few days. Never attach more than about 1Mb of photos to each outgoing email.

    Purchase a small portable PC, with a tiny screen, annoyingly small keyboard, cram the largest HD he can fit in, a USB port and a CF reader, and ethernet. Ignore any cables which come with the cameras, they'll just get fscked up and drivers are generally a bitch. You can get additional CF cards anywhere in the world (not sure about Bhutan, but I bought one in Albania last month). You can also get USB based CF readers most photo places in any major town on the planet, in case the PC or reader gets lost. Don't bother carrying a CD burner, they're too common so you can borrow them as you travel.

    If a whole tiny PC is too much to carry/worry about, then just a small USB CF reader you can hook to internet cafe computers will do. Small computers and fancy digital cameras tend to make you stick out in poorer areas, and thus a target for thieves, so don't count on the photos stored on the PC making it home.

    Go into a cyber cafe and ask to use his own PC on their internal network. If they allow it, then find out what their outgoing SMTP server is, and use it to relay t

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  33. Re:Stand Alone Data Storage - oh the power of goog by Unholy_Kingfish · · Score: 1

    I remember Fresh Gear on Tech TV loved the MindStor device. But I only see it in 10g. B&H has a Delkin which is simular, in 60g. BTW B&H rules, bought lots of stuff from them. Lets assume they have a 5MP camera (I have a Sony 5MP). Each picture is about 2.5 MB in JPG format. You'd get about 24000 pictures on the 60g drive. If they are going to carry a laptop around also, they might want to purchase a DVD burner and just move them from the laptops hard drive onto the DVD after some time. You can get a external burner for $350 or less, and $1 a disc. But, if you are going to fill the camera, and need to empty it quickly, the hard drive storage will be best. You could always go with the cheaper hard drive unit, and a DVD drive. Once you get enough pictures on the unit, move them to the laptop, then to DVD, or even CD.

    --
    Fear Is the Only God
  34. traveling by kupojsin · · Score: 1

    i just returned from a 8 month trip to israel and solved the same problem myself.
    i brought along a small agfe camera with regular alkaline batteries.
    it had internal storage for about 30 pictures and hooked up to any computer via usb.
    i would then download the drivers from wherever i was ( you could carry them on disk as well) and whenever i filled up i would post them to Ofoto.com for free
    this allowed me to send back an ongoing gallery of what i was doing.

  35. Media durability.. by Myself · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've long been a fan of CF, because of its high capacities and universality, which drives cost down. However, its is bulky compared to the other standards, and the multipin connector is expensive.

    My most recent camera is SmartMedia (SSFDC) based, and I'm happy with it. The neat thing about the cards is that they're flat. I can tuck one into my cheek to conceal it, slobber all over it "I don't know what you're talking about officer", wipe it off, put it back into the camera, and it works flawlessly.

    Doing the same thing with a CF card would result in the contact holes becoming waterlogged, and requiring compressed air to blast them out. By the way if you've never opened a CF card, grab one that you don't use any more (who needs all those 8mb starter cards that come with crappy cameras?) and rip it apart. They're pretty cool. I think I'll put photos up on my gallery, check the Tech album.

    Anyway, CF's speed and size are great, but the connector is its downfall as a media format. (as an expansion slot, lots of pins are great!)

    1. Re:Media durability.. by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      My most recent camera is SmartMedia (SSFDC) based, and I'm happy with it. The neat thing about the cards is that they're flat. I can tuck one into my cheek to conceal it, slobber all over it "I don't know what you're talking about officer", wipe it off, put it back into the camera, and it works flawlessly.

      Do I dare ask how you came to this finding?

  36. Never, EVER, stay in the IYH network by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Informative

    unless:
    You want to wake up at 7:00am to a roll call
    You want to sleep 20 to a room
    You want to be overcharged
    You want to have to pay for sheets.

    FAR better is to find the small, indepedent ones. Look in bus/train stations for signs, ask other backpackers.
    Scratch the frame pack/rollable suitcase - its going to be way too heavy, and you'll never really use the wheels. Just get a backpack.
    Don't worry about dressing locally, or buying from local junkshops - there will be other obviously foreign backpackers everywhere, and unless you speak fluent, idiomatic you'll always be a foreigner.
    Don't get a money belt, they're only used in James Bond movies and by kids whose parents are paranoid.
    If you're hitting sketchier places, hang onto some American currency (like a 50 USD note). It's remarkable what kind of magic it can work in places when you "suddenly" have paperwork problems at immigration/customs.
    Face it, you're a foreign tourist. Don't patronize the locals by pretending to be one. You'll fail at it. Don't be a rude, ugly American either. Treat people with respect, don't speak English LOUDLY AND S-L-O-W-L-Y and expect them to understand.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Never, EVER, stay in the IYH network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roll call??

      what decade are you talking about?

      having travelled extensively using the YHI network, I can safely say that I have NEVER been woken to a roll call...

      YHI hostels do suck tho, but only because everyone thinks they suck and thus stays away...

    2. Re:Never, EVER, stay in the IYH network by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      1) Most hostels have 9 or 10 am checkout times but if you ask, and for a small fee, you can stay all day and sleep in when it's quite quiet.

      2) Many hostels have private or family rooms. Some hostels only have private rooms, many have small two to six person dorms.

      3) The cost is always less than westernized hotels and often hostels are better maintained than local B&B's or "flophouses". For instance, the hostels in Japan are as nice as the hotels if not nicer and the cost is far less. You can stay at the train stations and use the public bathhouses for about the same price, but then you forgo the kitchen and laundry facilities. So no deal there, sorry dood.

      4) You purchase your own "sheet bag" and bring your own sleeping bag / blanket. This saves the rental and the enviroment and you can sleep in your own bed "sorta" ;)

      5) Reservations during high season are a must. The IYH reservation system is effective and inexpensive. The last thing you want is to be searching for accomadations in a strange place late at night. Sheesh. After you stayed at the hostel for a few days, you can find and rent a nice local apartment for a month or two and settle in if you like.

      Sure dood. Ever seen what airport baggage systems do to packs with straps. Get real eh. Also a have a dayback for the most irreplaceable items. Always carry it with you. Luggage often gets lost, sometimes forever.

      Not true, thieves won't know you're a "rich" American if you don't look like one. See?

      Lol, bribery is a great way to end up in a local jail until you can cough up some money. It's a favorite scam in many third world countries. Never, never do anything illegal in a foreign country unless you're willing to spend time in a foreign jail. Duh. Go ahead, flash cash, that keeps the bad guys from bothering peeps like me.

      You need a money belt especially when on trains or other crowds, pickpockets are quite common at airports, bus and train stations. Also, people will lift your stuff well you are napping, so be careful about where you catch a few z's.

      Try to fit in, try to learn the local customs and lanquage, the natives will appreciate it and you will experince things few if any tourists ever get to. Don't treat people like they are slow, they'll think your rude and obnoxious. Rather, write down common requests, have them translated and written clearly on sheet of paper and then point to the approriate statement so they can read what it is you want. Alternatively, get a phrase book. Then, practice saying those phrases. In a few days, you'll be making basic requests as if you were a native. This impresses the locals and they will give you the royal treatment.

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
    3. Re:Never, EVER, stay in the IYH network by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Never, EVER, stay in the IYH network

      Amen. IYH is for three groups:

      1. The very young, like student travel groups.
      2. The very old, like senior citizen travelers
      3. The very clueless, like timid Americans who have never been outside North America (or who think a semester in France makes them tres internationale)

      No scratch on the first two groups, good for them, they're well accomodated. The third group, however, is missing out. Missing out on better prices, more character, more locations, and an absence of dumb rules.

      IYH is a cartel that succeeds primarily through misleading naive first-time travelers into thinking that they have a corner on the hostel market, when in fact they run a small minority of the beds. Staying at IYH is like paying your "first-time backpacker" tax.

      And of course, a trip around the world will largely take in countries where staying in hostels - any hostels - is idiotic anyway because guest houses offer so much better value.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  37. Web email? Give me a break! by Myself · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know about you, but I've never seen web email that was happy about doing large file transfers. Assuming one only runs across an internet cafe every few weeks, one might have hundreds of megs of photos that need to be realiably sent home. No web mail is going to do that.

    Plus, most internet cafes don't have flash memory readers attached to the computers, and might not be happy if you plugged in your own. The only way to use the network "as you please" would be to bring along a laptop or Terapin Mine, and plug straight into the ethernet.

    Once internet access has been obtained, getting the photos somewhere is easy enough. Get an account on a friend's FTP server, and make them promise to make backups as soon as new uploads are detected.

    Then you just have to cope with the speed of the connection in a foreign internet cafe. If you're supremely lucky, they might have a T1/E1 connection, but it's more likely to be quite slow. Sitting there waiting for a half gig of photos to transfer might take a sizable bite out of one's day.

    Good tip about the universal current adapter. Instead of a 110-to-DC and a 220-to-110 adapter chained together, it might make more sense to order a 220-to-DC adapter. This is not only more reliable and lighter, it also makes it less obvious that you're a Yankee.

    Carry a set of Lithium batteries. They weigh almost nothing, and when your NiMHs are dead with no chance to charge them for a few more days, you'll be glad you spent ten bucks on the Lithiums.

    1. Re:Web email? Give me a break! by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      Webmail is the last resort granted, but, if you send one pic at a time it works well. The upload is the same for any protocol as it's limited to the available bandwidth in any case. One never has hundreds of megs in my experience. After I've disgarded flawed or inferior shots, I rarely snap more than five to ten pics a day. I uploaded them when I'm checking in and updating my travel log. Almost certainly, you find that either the cafe, one of the staff or a customer has a reader. However, I recommend carring the reader and drivers with with you.

      Few cafes are willing to install an FTP client. FTP is less reliable than HTTP in those situations in my experience.

      Internet cafes often have the best connections and they are almost always a high speed one. Cafes can't really function with MODEM's and the large user basis supports a broader pipe than most other individuals or organizations can afford.

      Ya, lithiums are better. Also, there are some lightweight solar or mechanical recharges that can come in handy for "outbacking"

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
    2. Re:Web email? Give me a break! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Good tip about the universal current adapter. Instead of a 110-to-DC and a 220-to-110 adapter chained together, it might make more sense to order a 220-to-DC adapter. This is not only more reliable and lighter, it also makes it less obvious that you're a Yankee.

      That's one of the most retarded things I've ever read. You honestly think that people nursing anti-American agendas are slinking around checking the power input ratings on tourists' DC adapters?

      And I presume you are unaware that 110V is used in Canada, the Caribbean, Latin America, Japan, Taiwan, and Saudi Arabia?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  38. AgX and Digital- What sucks now might not later. by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    I completed (3 years ago) a trip to Europe where I backpacked and carried an SLR AgX camera (silver halide, aka Film). I shot approximately 100 rolls of film. Some were over,under, normal exposures (to capture dynamic range in chrome), alot were throw away shots.
    But the great thing about editing is I've got them all stored in the original format.... and I can go back and look thru them for images that strike my fancy now that didn't otherwise before. After all, the incremental cost of a roll of film is extremely small.... same with digital (Assuming, of course, you own the appropriate media).
    Now, I didn't worry about 9/11 because it hadn't happened- all of my film was stored in plastic baggies that literally went in my knapsack wherever I went- raw, unshot film stayed in my backpack. My camera was NEVER out of my reach at any given point. I met people that worked for a living doing this that had had several )3) digital cameras stolen.
    Also if you get film processed, you can always ship it back. A single SLR battery will get you 100 rolls, less if you flash. It'll also cost you about as much as your low end digital camera (well, relatively high end but not yet prosumer SLR quality) to go that route. Glass alone will cost 300$

    What I am trying to say, in essence, is that the technology may NOT be there yet. You can hit cybercafes if you are close by to get them to burn you CDs, but you'd better have your own MIA (media interface adapter) and a CD of the drivers. And even then they may not let you touch the comps. I ran into a few places that had macs as their primary computer (who'd thunk that!).... burning CDs is a luxury that youd probably not get.
    Best bet, which is very unfortunate, get a laptop that can burn CDs for you to back up from. Get a few power adapters for the various voltages.... and possibly a solar power charger for your backpack top (can stick it out the window on the train). BUy several backup sticks/memory cards- they will break/get stolen.
    Worse of all .... be prepared to lose everything if your backpack gets stolen.
    You could try to do a mail drop now and then, but I lost about 50% of what I sent home, so... good luck :)

  39. Laptop, and lots of power converters. by ka9dgx · · Score: 1
    If you're using a digital camera, you MUST have a source of power to recharge the batteries anyway, so just plan to need to recharge from time to time.

    Organization Stuff

    Stuff the pictures into folders like this:
    \yyyy\yyyymmdd
    This allows the directory size to be managable, and since you're not likely to cause the camera to roll over, filenames aren't an issue.

    Use a program such as Thumbs Plus to view the photos, and prune (if you must). The "slide show" mode lets you rip through images for review like a dream. For editing, I use Paint Shop Pro.

    These programs have served me well for the 82,000 I've accumulated so far.

    Gear

    If you can, get an old laptop that burns CDs. It doesn't have to be fast, or pretty, it just has to run at least 2 hours on a charge. If that can't be done, try to get a pair of old Toshiba Librettos (they look like old PDAs, and are less likely to be stolen).

    Get power adapters, cables, etc, for all the countries you plan to visit. If you're technical at all, take some alligator clips, and a small multimeter for use in rigging up power. (They make them small and cheap at Radio Shack)

    Figure out some way to back the stuff up (via CD if possible, or cloning the Librettos)

    --Mike--

  40. Re:AgX and Digital- What sucks now might not later by Piquan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't understand the points you're making. Are you saying that digital cameras are less likely to get stolen than SLRs? I don't see the logic here.

    Target sells Kodak ISO 400, 96 exposure film at $9/roll, or about $0.10/exposure for film. Processing the film runs about $2.25/roll, or about $0.02/exposure. A 256 MB CF card runs about $56.99, and holds about 1000 exposures (based on the space of the pics I took on vacation last week). That's about $0.005/exposure for CF, versus $0.12/exposure for film. If you go with 64 MB cards, so you can send them back home every 200 or so exposures, then you're still looking at about about $0.01/exposure. Now, remember that with digital, you can pick your best shots and reclaim the space, for another improvement of from 3:1 to 30:1, depending on the quality. I'd say the incremental cost of film is much higher than that of CF. (I omitted the battery costs here, since I don't have a lot of info to go on. If you use rechargables and have occasional access to power, you're fine.)

    Besides, I'd rather have thin, light CF cards and a light digital camera than lots of bulky film and a heavy SLR.

  41. Used Toughbooks, video cameras. by Myself · · Score: 1

    I personally own two Panasonic Toughbooks (an old CF-25, and my present CF-17), and I love them to death, despite the fact that the old batteries don't hold squat for a charge anymore. I found a place that'll rebuild the packs(nuclearcomputers@nospam.hotmail.com) but I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

    Buying a used Toughbook can be bit of an adventure. If the auction doesn't say the port covers are present and in good shape, they probably aren't. If it doesn't say the battery holds a useful charge, it definitely doesn't. One nice thing is that all the Toughbook models share a common battery charger, so the AC and car adapters are universal.

    Owning a machine that you can dropkick while running is a lot of fun. I think nothing of walking in the rain, laptop perched on one hand, typing with the other, Nextel velcroed to the back of the machine with a plastic baggie over the top of it because the sissy phone isn't ruggedized. IRC from a thunderstorm? You bet! Folks sometimes look at me funny when I use the laptop as a hammer.

    As far as the memory stick thing: Utter madness! Can you imagine a computer with a 40-gig hard drive, that only let you store data on floppies? That's just assinine. Digital video cameras that don't let you use the tape for stills are crap. Many do, and I'm presently in the process of figuring out which do and which don't. Just imagine, thousands of megapixel still photos on a single tape.

    By the way, if you're not Firewire-enabled, some of the new DV cameras will let you download the mpeg movie data from the tape over USB 1.1. Although it is agonizingly slow, it works in a pinch.

  42. Been there done that by Xenna · · Score: 1

    I just finished a 12 month trip to Asia and Oceania 6 months ago. I got by with a 2.4 MP camera and 2 128 MB CF cards.

    I may not be a typical tourist but I came nowhere close to 50 pix a day as one of the other posters wrote. We took a total of 2500 pictures. Don't forget to have fun without thinking of taking pistures all the time.

    My CF cards held a maximum of 450 pix at a time. I regularly stopped at an Internet cafe to write the pix to a CD. There are Internet cafe's everywhere and they're rapidly catching on to digital photography. Some photo-shops do it too but they tend to be more expensive.

    I met some people from back home on the way and I gave them copies of my CD's to take home safely, in case I got robbed somewhere. This never happen although a couple of guys on a motorbike tried to pull my camera off my belt while I was riding a motorbike myself.

    With the new 1GB CF cards I might have been able to do it with just the one card. But it's very risky to walk around with a year's worth of photo's on your belt. Pretty quickly the emotional value of the pix starts exceeding the value of the camera and memory cards.

    X.

  43. Internet cafes are everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even back in '99 I found them in the most unlikely places, every little town in Spain had one, Tangiers had one, little out of the way places in the middle of Africa that have no name had one. They aren't expensive by American standards unless your friend is really travelling on a shoestring. Where the connectivity is halfway decent he could probably find a way to email the pictures home for safekeeping, or if not burn a CD to snail mail home. I wouldn't risk carrying all my photos with me for a year, CF isn't indestructible.

    And this was in '99. Now that Mount Everest has Internet, I suspect you really need to go to the most out of the way, poorest or totally unspoiled places in the world to not have technology available. Everything thinks they'll go there, but unless your friend really lives "The Beach", he'll be seeing an Internet cafe every place he goes.

  44. I'd second this (X's drive) by skware · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at these for a couple of weeks, and I reckon it's the best idea. Reads pretty much all various media formats, writes to whatever size hdd you put in it. Grab a small CF / mmc / whatever and xfer all the photos to this once you've filled it and you're cheering. The only hassle that the original poster may have is the usb, though there's gotta be some net cafes round the place that have USB...

    The website for it is here:
    http://www.xs-drive.com/xsdrive2/

    copy/paste from the site:

    X'S-DRIVE II FEATURES

    Unlimited internal storage capacity
    The X'S-Drive II works with 2.5 inches Hard Drives of any capacity. You can purchase the X'S-Drive II with a pre-installed Hard Drive or install your own (provided it's 9.5mm).

    Compact & light device
    It weights only 300g with the built-in Hard drive and is easy to carry (13 x 7.5 x 2.5 cm).
    The X'S-Drive II is provided with a free Carry Bag that you can also use to carry your memory cards.

    Compatible with all the Memory Cards - No Adapter required (apart from xD which require a CF adapter)
    The X'S-Drive works with all current memory cards used with digital cameras: Compactflash, IBM Microdrive, SmartMedia, Memory Stick (Sony & LexarMedia), Memory Stick Pro, Secure Digital, and MultiMediaCard.

    Fast transfer speeds
    The file transfer from a memory card to the X'S-Drive is performed quickly by the X'S-Drive (i.e. a full CompactFlash 128MB is transferred to the HDD in 2:15 minutes).
    The file transfer to and from your computer are done via the fast USB 2.0 interface connection.

    LCD Panel
    LCD Panel to display the working status (no picture preview).

    1. File transfer status
    2. Amount of battery power left
    3. Main storage out of memory indicator

    Rechargeable Battery
    The Xâ(TM)S-Drive II has a built-in rechargeable Lithium-ion battery which allows 1.6 hours of usage on full charge.

    Warranty
    The Xâ(TM)S-Drive II is guaranteed against manufacturer's defects for 1 year.

  45. Actually ur a bit off... but pretty close! by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    It's actually a bit higher on cost- rolls come in or 4 packs, so say you'll buy all 36 exposure rolls for 10$ (not unreasable, but not cheapest route either). That works out to be roughly $0.10 (what you got) worth of film. Development is actually 3x that cost since it's 3 rolls, so that cost is $0.0625, so about $0.16 per photograph
    Now your CF 256mb has a rebate on it- they are 80$ a piece. And you can only get 256 images from a 3megapixel camera (and frankly anything lower will suck for image quality). So that is $.313 for each photo. For arguments sake, you get 10 buddies together and they all spend the 85$ to get the cards with rebates for 56$, thats now $0.21 per image.
    Yep, you can reclaim the images you don't like- lets make sure you know you will never want that photo...
    One aspect about digital that you talk about but fail to understand (and many people do, I'm not singling you out) is that things *can* go wrong with *any* image, digital or AgX. Basically you can corrupt data bits on the card, can have the camera shut off too fast, or worst- accidently format the wrong card. Same thing with AgX- can drop the film, drive over it (done that). Drop it into water (been there).
    And when it comes down to the final comparison, image quality.. well... you just can't beat AgX until you hit the digital SLR realm, in which case (and not even then) you come close.... to making an 11x14. I've got some 20x30's that hang in my room from my Europe trip which show exceptional detail, even down to the text engraved upon the wall. You can't get that from a digital point-and-shoot camera.
    But it's no matter to try.
    As for the 'bulky' film, well, it's about 3x bigger than the cartridge but much easier to handle and has alot less theft-interest ;)

    1. Re:Actually ur a bit off... but pretty close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now your CF 256mb has a rebate on it- they are 80$ a piece. And you can only get 256 images from a 3megapixel camera (and frankly anything lower will suck for image quality). So that is $.313 for each photo.

      Perhaps you weren't aware, but you can move the images off the card, and re-use it!

      Oh, the wonders of modern technology!

      So, that "256 images" turns into 2,560,000 (based on min. 10,000 r/w cycles) images, which makes your $0.313 per photo more like $0.0000313 per photo.

    2. Re:Actually ur a bit off... but pretty close! by cdrudge · · Score: 1
      Now your CF 256mb has a rebate on it- they are 80$ a piece. And you can only get 256 images from a 3megapixel camera (and frankly anything lower will suck for image quality). So that is $.313 for each photo. For arguments sake, you get 10 buddies together and they all spend the 85$ to get the cards with rebates for 56$, thats now $0.21 per image.

      You pay too much for your CF cards. You can find name brand cards retail for $60 out the door. Generic for even less. If you count rebates, they get even cheaper. 30.00 is the norm. Dell had a sale a month ago 6 256MB cards for $100 after rebate.

      Also, not everyone needs to take 3megapixle images. What resolution he uses should depend on what he wants to do with them. If he is going to blow them up to 8x10s, then 3megapixels is good. If he is going to post them to a webpage, he better have a cheap webhost. If they are for 4x6 or just memories, a 1 or 2 megapixel will do with compression.
    3. Re:Actually ur a bit off... but pretty close! by Piquan · · Score: 1

      And you can only get 256 images from a 3megapixel camera (and frankly anything lower will suck for image quality).

      I'd never take photos for a job at low quality, but on my vacation last week, I took a lot of 640x and 1024x pics. I'm not trying to publish National Geographic here... I just want to remember where I've been, and what it looks like. (I was in coastal California. It looks nice.) I also modulated my sizes: when I was taking a picture I thought I'd want in high quality, I'd take it in high res. And when I didn't, I didn't.

      Yep, you can reclaim the images you don't like- lets make sure you know you will never want that photo...

      I take pics at about a 8:1 shooting ratio. For every pic I'm going to want to print, I take about 8 shots on the average. I hear the pros get about a 36:1 ratio; they'll go through a whole roll for one shot. I generally can reclaim on the fly at about half that: after I've taken my eight or so shots, I can point at six (on the average, sometimes more or less) and say, "That is not a shot I will want." So I get about a 4:1 ratio for on-the-fly reclaimation purposes. And this is keeping shots that are so hideously underexposed you can't see anything but a dim glow of low lights. (I'm thinking of my footage of William Randolph Hearst's home theater. No flash allowed, and I didn't have a tripod. But I kept it to digitally recover the picture later. It turns out that the pic sucked, if you're wondering.) Maybe you're more conservative than I am: maybe you would get about a 2:1 reclaimation. I just have a hard time believing that you can't, before you go to bed, look at your shots that day and say "I will not use this shot" for any of them. Unless you are a lot more lucky at photos than I am.

      There's a quality versus convenience tradeoff at work in the AgX vs digital discussion here. I fall towards the convenience end. I figger I'm there to enjoy the trip and learn about the local land and people, and the photos are a good thing to do while I'm at it. It sounds like you fall towards the quality end.

    4. Re:Actually ur a bit off... but pretty close! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Now your CF 256mb has a rebate on it- they are 80$ a piece.

      Why? Are we pretending it's 2002? Or are you talking Canadian dollars? Or was it the kind of rebate that makes the price go up (from the normal $60) rather than down? Because those are optional, you know.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  46. 2 options by andrewleung · · Score: 1

    i have ran into this problem before in 2000... some of these problems have been solved now. there are a few ways.

    just buy a camera that can handle CDRWs... like the sony CD mavica:
    Sony Mavica CD 300 or any other of these series. the media is not the standard but carrying 10 of them won't be much of a problem. mailing will be simple too. since it's a smaller CD, whenever you run into civilization, you can back up onto something else (the internet, bigger CDR, DVD, etc.) without needing non-standard parts.
    (note: smaller camera would be better, but if you're travelling for that long, you will want zoom...)

    if you want something else that can handle PC card (all memory types has PC card adapters) like a digital wallet from minds@work (who are out of business... XD ) but there are some out that are previously posted. here's one on ebay: here

    that would have kicked ass when i was travelling. shoot until have no battery instead of wasting time dumping pictures...

    another would be to get one of these: VAIO C1 note. a picture book. that way, when you have dead time on the train, plane, etc, you can blog on it. adding more details to your pictures, etc. definitely worth thinking about. C1s can be had pretty cheap since they've come out with a few versions already... you gotta hunt on Ebay for a good deal. there are lots here in japan.

    email me if you want some more suggestions/tips. i'm not a pro, but i have been on the road with consumer digital camera without a padded wallet and know what it's like.

  47. CF card reader with built in Hard Drive? by chrestomanci · · Score: 1

    What about one of these:

    6 in 1 Card Reader (SM/MMC/SD/CF/Microdrive/Mstick) + Takes 2.5" HDD (not Supplied)

    According to the product info, it is battery powered and does not need a PC. You can copy data between flash cards and the internal hard drive.

    Using one of these readers, the questioner could copy photos from their camera's flash card to a larger hard drive. They might then post the flash card home, while retaining a backup with them in case it is lost in the post.

    I hope this helps.

  48. WarezPix by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Actually given that the guy is going to have to download all the pictures to his hard drive to burn them to CD (the CompactFlash media transfer rates would never support burning a CD) so I sort of assumed he was going to do that anyways.

    I always do ... and if they get upity about their data I highlight them all and hit delete, soon as they walk off I fetch them from the trash-bin. Call it off-site unintentional backup.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  49. Just use Internet Cafes by spuke4000 · · Score: 1

    I recently spent 2 1/2 weeks in southern Chile/Argentina. I was traveling with people who were travelling for 10 months, and I spoke to a lot of people who were travelling for a long time. The simplest way I saw was just to transfer images from a camera using USB and then burn them on a CD. I wouldn't have thought this, but there were LOTS of internet cafes that provided this ability. Small towns in the middle of Patagonia with 1000 people would have 3 internet cafes. And, from what I've been told, it's like this all over South America.

    Maybe where you are going it's different, but maybe you should look at the available technology where you are going.

    --
    This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  50. Re:AgX and Digital- What sucks now might not later by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

    CF Cards are fine I suppose, but they're oddly shaped for the traveler. I have a Sony 3.1Mp Digital Camera, and it obviously uses the Sony Memory sticks. Now I know it would run several hundreds of dollars to buy up a bunch of those Sony 128MB memsticks, however they're half the size of a stick of gum. If I were going all over the world by backpack, I'd just make sure to have some "pockets" in which to sew the memsticks into so that they're guaranteed not to fall out. Tightly wrap them in a couple layers of plastic and you'll probably be ok. Maybe send some home every couple months through priority registered Fedex out of the major cities worldwide, and confirm their receipt by checking in with friends/family back home before leaving that major city (you're site seeing in some of the major cities aren't you?).

    Having backpacked through some really sopping wet conditions, I know those cheap Kodak one-time cameras stand up fine to the heat, wetness, and humidity (90% humidity in 90 degree heat with all-day downpour soaking me to the bone) well enough when properly wrapped up in plastic. Unfortunately, not having a digital camera meant I took some really crappy pictures that ended up being rather worthless once I was back home. And the previous poster was dead-on. Digital is FAR cheaper and easier to backpack with (weight is a consideration) than a bunch of disposable cameras or 35mm film. Just be careful with your equipment and you'll be fine.

  51. A digital option and a couple film options by dspyder · · Score: 1

    Several of the hard-drive based MP3 players have connections for CF cards. The Archos Multimedia has a module with SMC and CF readers, and even a photo module that has a cheap crappy camera. You can then upload from the CF cards (buying only as much as you'll shoot before you get a chance to dump them to the MP3 player). A side benefit of this is that they often include a voice recorder so that you can diary things and track them by date.

    For film, why not just send the film directly back to one of the online photo processing/image hosting sites? They'll get it developed and posted without any intervention from you, so your friends and family can check them out and you can also take a look when you do find Internet connectivity.

    What would I do? Get a Canon EOS Elan II (or the more modern equivalent with metal parts, not the cheaper Rebels) and a Canon digital SLR (is it the D60 or is there something newer?) and a couple of lenses: 50mm prime, 28-110mm, 80-300mm... and just swap the backs between them as needed. Add the 20gig Archos MM w/ the correct card reader and you're good to go. Then if you're out of battery or film at least you have another option.

    Of course then your pack is considerably heavier, but I wouldn't want to be without some kind of photographic means on a trip like that! I would skip the bulky/fragile laptop in favor of this setup.

    --D

  52. Scaling requirements by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    I was origionally going to say, isn't 10K pictures WAY overkill, then did the math 10,000/365 is about 27 pictures a day. I guess 10K may be a low number. Of course with digital media, you can delete pictures that you don't want, so taking a picture an hour that you want to keep isn't horribly high.

    That said, I think CF is the way to go, wait until you are JUST ready to go before dropping into Fry's/etc. Look for the largest CF card you can get (512M today, 1GB tomorrow I am sure). Pick up as many as you can afford. They are light, and can easily be mailed somewhere (is loss in mail THAT high ?) and returned later in the itenerary. The other choice is to find a drop in iCafe, download the CFs that you have, and e-mail/transfer them to home (have an FTP site ready for it)

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Scaling requirements by topham · · Score: 1

      I would discourage going for the largest cards.

      Yes, economically they make the most sense. But they have the highest risk too.

      The larger the card the more pictures you will lose if the card fails you.

      Try to find the sweet spot on price, number of pictures per card and the number of cards you want to carry.

      Maybe buy cards based on an expectation of number of pictures to be taken within a time period (sy, 2 weeks) and mail them back to yourself or a friend. As others have said you don't want to lose the pictures part way through (or god forbid at the END) of the trip. Find some way to mitigate your risk.

      (If you think you can drop into somewhere and have images transfered from the cards to CD-R and mail those back, great... etc.

      I did some traveling across Canada by car and was able to take a laptop with me. Images from the trip were transfered to the Harddrive a long the way when the CF card filled up.

  53. Where's that American Pride? Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    One last, somewhat strange piece of advice, you may also want to sew a small Canadian flag to your pack. I've had far less problems since I did.


    Do this if you're a Canadian. If you're an American, why not see how well your foriegn policy flies overseas? Or are you not proud of the red, white and blue. God knows I see enough of that shit when I go to the US.

    I -AM- a Canadian, and when I see arrogant americans doing this, it makes my blood boil. There's a reason that flag gives you less problems, idiot. If I ran into someone doing this, you would be mocked, and depending on how drunk I was - beat down.

    Insightful my hairy white ass.

    1. Re:Where's that American Pride? Coward. by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have dual citizenship so I've travelled under both flags. As much as I'm proud of my country (s), my advice stands. I never had so many problems as when I had the stars n strips displayed. If you don't like it, then I recommend no flag at all. Unfortunately, many people don't seem to like Americans, especially affluent ones. Go figure, huh.

      Personally, I'd love to show the flag that I'm so proud of, it's just to bad it's been given such a bad name by so many self-serving, affluent, upperclass, so-called, "Americans". Imho, some people's loyalty is only to money. The corruption of excessive affluence is America's biggest problem and gravest threat.

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
  54. Cool idea for storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Why doesn't somebody invent a standalone CD burner that accepts a 512MB compact flash and burns a CD of whatever is on it? That would be great for this application.

  55. Archos Multimedia Jukebox by jthomas2 · · Score: 1
    Comes with an adapter to download CF & SM media onto it. It's rather sweet and let's you preview the images on the device and as a bonus stores your mp3's (Pimsleur language tapes for learning local languages as you travel) and ripped dvd's (for those long plane & train rides).

    Make sure you have all the adapters so you can recharge it via local outlets & voltages.

    Traveling the world as a geek does rule. As geeks our major problem is we try to generalize our lives to NOT ENOUGH DATA. Travel gives you enormous quantities of data - especially if you blend in with the local travels. You learn so much about the world and when you come home and apply it to your own world - the possibilities are unlimited.

    -Jay Thomas

    Countries visited in the two years: Saudi Arabia, India (Kerela & Bombay), China (Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen), Japan (Tokyo), Hong Kong, Taiwan (Taipei), Macao, Mexico & Canada

    Plans for the next year: Japan (next month!), Spain, Thailand, among other places!

    http://www.jthomas2.com

    jthomas2@uiuc.edu

    1. Re:Archos Multimedia Jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have one of these - taken it on several trips. It takes about 2 minutes to download a 64Mb Smartmedia - that's about a day's shooting 77 pics at 4mp,give or take. At that rate, it would last several months between charges.

      I'd be more concerned about how to recharge the batteries for the camera then, not the archos MMJ. My battery on the Fuji 4900 is lucky to last a day.If you're outside the First world, or camping, maybe one of those small Slar Panel car batter chargers might help.

  56. Very Much Quality by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    The only problem I see with shooting at lower resolution is the inevitable "GOD! I wish I had taken that photo higher- it's awesome!". You know, that one in a million shot....
    My trip to Europe consumed around 100 rolls of film. The last one was 50 rolls in 10 days. So yeah.... burning film is a bit of a cost, but I have huge prints to thank for it (And a gf that really hates roman ruins now ;P)

  57. Re:Stand Alone Data Storage - iBook? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    My friend is headed overseas for quite a while with his new Sony 5MP camera he had the same problem. So my friends and I bought him and iBook- they're cheap (about $1300) durable (polycarbonate plastics) small and very versitile and have good battery life and a big hard drive (60 gigs). Our original plan was to get him a Sony Vaio but the battery life was...how to say it...severly lacking. The iBook has enough power to play MP3's organise pictures and watch movies. That said- It's no desktop replacement, but it fits this job quite well.

  58. Ugh... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Get a good travel pack, one that is both an internal frame pack and a suitcase with wheels. Pack light, get a money belt. Never display american money on the street if possible.

    One last, somewhat strange piece of advice, you may also want to sew a small Canadian flag to your pack. I've had far less problems since I did.

    It's far, far better not to display any signs of affluence.

    So when you're wheeling that suitcase/backback down the street with the Canadian flag on it, people will think "hey, a local."

    Travelling light and blending in is the best advice. Forget the interior frame suitcase/backpacks. They're unbalanced, oversized and overweight. If you need to wheel your pack, it's very conspicuous and far too heavy! Carry the kind of pack that a highschool student would carry. You can only squeeze a couple sets of lightweight clothes in there and some maps & stuff. If you have money, most problems are easy to solve.

    Don't use maps in public, don't bring out any travel guides in public.... and don't bring $2000 worth of digital camera equipment unless you're willing to hand it over when you're jumped in a dark alley. (Hide some bills in a very concealed location, don't keep your passport with your money, and keep a 'fake' wallet (a few bills and some domestic book cards) handy. (while you're at it, I've taken to scanning travel documents and putting them on a password protected website. Get companions to carry copies of your docs too, and carry copies of theirs.)

    You're probably blending in alright when people start asking you for directions. It's impossible to blend in completely, you just don't want to make it obvious that you're a tourist, and you don't want to make it obvious that you're carrying lots of valuable stuff.

    I like the disposable camera idea. I also like the idea of a cheap digital with CF or SmartMedia cards.

    Youth hostels are o.k., some suck, who cares. If you're not carrying that flag-laden wheeling suitcase, sleeping in a park shouldn't be a problem. I tend to avoid it because I'm a small person and I'm not normally good with the local language. It's not safe if you can't answer the vagrant/drug dealer/police officer.

    1. Re:Ugh... by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      Generally, the only places you're carrying your travel pack is when your arriving or leaving. You don't wander around the town with your full pack. You use your carry on daypack for that.

      Packs are easily carried and balanced. It's called design. This is a packs function so I don't understand your comment.

      It's hard to fit everything into a daypack. I know of a few people who travel this way. If you can live very simply, yes, it's a good idea but not nearly as easy as you make it sound. As well, not everyone can afford to spend thier way out of every situation.

      The scanned copies online is a good idea, however, if border officials find you with someone elses documents on you, it will cause no end of grief. Your best to carry photocopies and the originals in separate locations. Check with the local embassy and only ever check your passport with them. If you are asked to give up your passport, let the embassy know right away.

      The only problem with disposable cameras is they don't mail well as they go through xray scanners, esp airmail of any kind. Also, they don't always arrive or they arrive in poor condition.

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
  59. Simple & cheap solution by declana · · Score: 1

    Most cities your friend visits will have tech shops that will download his pics and burn a CD for him. Check out Lonely Planet's Thorn Tree for lists of shops and to post requests for shop locations on your route. The most popular solution is to burn two disks: mail one and carry the other.

    He could also bring his software and connection cable to any similar shop and upload your pics to a service like O-Photo for net storage and sharing with your friends while on route.

    These solutions are not flashy but they are cheaper and simpler than most that have been suggested.

  60. stop snapping, start looking by misterpies · · Score: 1

    10 000 pictures... I'm glad I'm not invited to his end-of-trip slideshow.

    You know, since my camera broke, it's revolutionised my vacations. You've no idea of the difference it makes when you use both eyes to look at something. Depth perception, it brings a whole new dimension to your holiday.

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  61. If you backpack, they will steal it. by thogard · · Score: 1

    Plan on getting robbed every 6 months while backing packing depending on where in the world you are. In poorer more desprate parts of the world, plan on even more often. The devices and media will get stolen. Many places with "low crime" may have a high rate of theft with little risk of bodily injury.

    Most internet cafes can do run machines with USB and you should be able to transfer pictures back to a server but it will be slow. Many net cafes are a few dialups in parallel and you may get lucky and find a high speed dsl link but figure on upload speeds of about 1/2 modem speeds. Most one hour film devlopment places can put photos on cd and many of them can read most camera smart cards. It may be much cheaper to pay them to copy the data to a CD and mail the CD back home. You will need to keep track of what got mailed because you may find packages may not make it back.

    You may want to consider a fiber reinforced security bags but in some parts of the world such gimmicks will annoy the thieves and that can result in being stabed.

    I've got several friends that have been all over the world and some of them have been backpacking for years. Don't lower your guard, cause thats when stuff goes missing. Always keep photocopies of your passport and keep your other ID and money in two different places.

  62. get a colour PDA that can read your media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a colour PDA that can read whatever media the camera uses. Have a decent photo manipulation program on the PDA (e.g. gimp), this way you can retouch, crop and recompress images thus getting a lot more images onto a single card. Probably best if both the PDA and camera run on AA batteries and compact flash is the most durable (and cheapest???) media. Your probably still best posting the disks home or just keeping hold of them. Uploading 64megs from a cybercafe using dialup is gonna take a while.

  63. Blend in? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Backpackers can't blend in.

    And I don't know how he looks, but if he/she is caucasian he will stand out in most parts of this world.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  64. personal preference by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The traveller needs to decide what his/her priorities are. Personally, in my experience, which includes 6 months of backpacking the Appalachian Trail in the US in 1999 and 5 months travelling overseas in 2000 (Asia, OZ, NZ), film is the way to go. The way I travel, the less shite I carry, the happier I am. With an SLR with one 50mm lens I didn't have to worry about batteries, or power adapters or even the value of the camera. When you start humping around a new digital camera, plus battery chargers, cd burners, laptops and the like, you're spending more time guarding, packing and unpacking that crap than you do enjoying the trip.

    Internet cafes are shockingly ubiquitous in other parts of the world (easily more prevalent than in the US). But I wouldn't want to rely on them to upload my photos to home; how much time do you want to spend waiting on a 28k shared connection while it tries to send a couple megs of photos home? Yeah, there's a risk to sending film home. But I didn't lose any, whether shipped home from Podunk, Tennessee or Northern Thailand. When overseas, I usually developed the film locally & shipped the prints home. Negatives are pretty small & light & easy to carry in a backpack.

    The camera itself is one I bought used for a girlfriend about 10 years ago for something like $200. She later bought a better one for herself & left this one behind when moving out. Takes great pics & for a reasonable price can be replaced on the road if it gets lost or broken. I can't imagine taking a brand new $1400 digicam as one poster recommended. a) thats a huge portion of most folks travel budgets and b) if you lose it, you're potentially in a hard spot; obliged to buy another unit that works with the storage media you've invested so much money in. Or start over with another media family. 35mm film is available everywhere, doesn't require much for a battery and takes a pretty decent picture. So thats what I'll keep using.

    For what its worth, I do have a digital, that cost me over twice as much as my SLR, plus batteries & charger & storage media. It works great as a point-and-shoot camera. But for travelling, I don't trust its reliability or durability. If I scratch the SLR lens, I can replace it for as little as $30, though I'd prolly spend more like $60 for something at least half way decent. On a digital camera, what's it going to cost to fix that? They're certainly cool & serve a purpose, I just think a person talking about such an extended trip ought to consider all the ramifications of their decision.

    To summarize:

    1. value - how worried are you about losing/ breaking?
    2. reliability - is it robust? easy to fix in other parts of the world?
    3. pain-in-the-ass-factor (eg. batteries, getting pics home, etc)
    4. cost of replacement if lost/broken

    There're other factors worth considering too, posted by other folks. This isn't an issue where one solution is perfect for everyone; do what you want. I know what works for me.

  65. Batteries by motha_chucker · · Score: 1

    Looks like there has been a lot of great ideas for storage but, little mention of how to keep the devices powered up. A couple of people have suggested rigging solar panels to battery chargers. That is a good idea but, here is an all inclusive product for charging batteries via solar power.

  66. what about batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Storage is really the least of your worries when traveling light with a digital camera. Your main worry is battery power and how to recharge/buy new batteries in remote areas. Spending a lot of money on Compactflash cards solves storage problems- but not your battery problem.

  67. prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=DCR-TRV950+&pr ice1=1000&price2=1300&price=between&btnP=G o

  68. Archos Jukebox by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    Check out the Archos Jukebox Multimedia 20 with the Super Bundle (link).

    20GB portable hard drive with options up the ying-yang. Card readers and USB and cameras, oh my.

    $400US.

    As for being away from power, look at solar battery chargers, available at auto parts stores.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  69. Digital or film? by Alizarin · · Score: 1

    There are several questions to answer before deciding if digital is the appropriate choice.

    What does he want to do with the pictures? Does he like to give slide shows? How big does he want to enlarge for printing? Does he use a laptop as a photo album?

    What kind of lens does he want to shoot with? Telephoto? Wide angle?

    How light and how small does the whole kit need to be? Carrying more than 3 pounds all day long is a drag.

    How important is it to shoot at night? Not many digital cameras have a lens as fast as f1.2 which can add an additional hour or two of shooting time to the day.

    Is he willing to take two cameras? Perhaps a film camera for the serious shots (enlarging or slide shows) and a digital for snapshots?

    Does he like B & W photography? Does he want to make nice big 16 x 20 B & W prints? That implies shooting B & W film and printing in a darkroom.

    Does he already own any equipment? Can he borrow any for the trip? Many people have several cameras and are willing to loan ones they arenâ(TM)t using.

    Such a long trip really makes the storage of digital files an expensive problem to solve. I would rather put the money into camera and lens than storage cards. Another problem is a digital cameraâ(TM)s appetite for batteries. The solutions for solving the storage and battery problems are going to be more stuff to buy, carry and deal with.

    I would say there has to be some specific reasons beyond cost-per-shot for using digital; otherwise the disadvantages donâ(TM)t outweigh the advantages. Like if he really plans on emailing snaps back home as often as possible, maintaining a blog, or something like that which film canâ(TM)t do. Otherwise, just buy the best 35mm camera system he can afford.

  70. Try the Image-Tank by bjkeale · · Score: 1

    Not long after I got my digital camera, I went on a 10 day holiday OS. I had to take my laptop with me to download the photos each day or two and I really wished this unit was around then. This nifty unit is the ultimate answer to your friend's (and my) dilema. The image tank has a laptop hard disk in it and a USB interface, with both CF and SmartMedia Slots. It has the option of between 20 to 40 GB of storage and is pretty small, reasonably light weight and rugged. It has a 12VDC adaptor, 100-240VAC power supply and based on most cameras putting out around a 1MB JPEG for the average shot (3.3Mp) it will store around 40,000 images before he will have to download. There are adaptors for Sony MemStick, SD Mem, etc. How do I know of these?? No, I dont work for them, it is on my Xmas list!. See this site -> http://www.image-tank.com/

  71. Burn to CDs by ijcd · · Score: 1

    I just got back from a trip where I did this. I had 2 large memory cards that I could use to hold about 400 pics total. When I started running out of space, I would find an Internet cafe and have them burn them onto CD. Pretty easy.

    If you are worried about losing them, burn 2 copies and send one home.