Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Transparency, USB, Europatents

Slashback with a followup on the perpetual motion DeLorean, a word on RIAA bank-account-jacking, a reminder about the fast-tracked vote on software patents in the EU, the real meaning of "high speed USB" and more. Read on below for the details.

Now even less than a week ... mpawlo writes "As reported by Greplaw, although I am still looking for further confirmation, it seems like the EU vote on software patentability has been moved from the late fall to June 30, 2003. Yes, that is in one (1) week. If you have more information and another source - please comment on this news item."

Mikael writes: "Personally, I find it somewhat disturbing from a democracy perspective that this proposal seems to be fast-tracked in the middle of the summer, when most Europeans want to focus on whether they should have strawberry or vanilla ice cream. In Sweden, we also got our Swedish version of the DMCA this week. I guess the ice cream will have to wait."

DoSthAboutIt points out that "A 'Petition for a Free Europe without Software Patents' has gained more than 150000 signatures. Among the supporters are more than 2000 company owners and chief executives and 25000 developpers and engineers from all sectors of the European information and telecommunication industries, as well as more than 2000 scientists and 180 lawyers. Companies like Siemens, IBM, Alcatel and Nokia lead the list of those whose researchers and developpers want to protect programming freedom and copyright property against what they see as a 'patent landgrab.' The whole article can be found here, including some statistics like signatories by country"

The story of Peng. mantispraying writes "Looks like the college student who settled with the the RIAA for $12,000, his entire life savings, has recouped all of his money thanks to a very generous file sharing community. Also, the search engine he created that got him in trouble is back online, for demonstration purposes only, of course."

Reader T points out that while one of the students who lost his life savings to RIAA has made it back through PayPal donations, "the other, Dan Peng, is still short about $12,000. Brother, can you spare a dime?"

I'd prefer the garrote and the stick, but hey. Mark Ferguson writes: "I attended the FTC spam forum. It seems I was on their call list :-) I parlayed that into getting several others on the panels as well. While there I spoke with bulk emailers and other industry folks. Some people defined Confirmed OPT-IN to mean you sending a confirmation that the email address was subscribed so they were doing double, confirmed OPT-IN.

My heads spins.

What I figured from what I learned was these folks truly refused to accept real definitions the Service Providers have been using for years so I decided to do a site for just this. ... Anyway, reboot, aka Andrew Cockrell myself and another built The Carrot and the Stick to explain email, define the best practices and to get people to abide by them.

Thoughts, comments and/or suggestions?"

Sooner or later, that DeLorean's going to land someone in jail. hackwrench writes "According to channel WSMV news, Alternate Energy Inventor Carl Tilley's compound was raided. Tilley was previously mentioned on Slashdot here."

Tilley had announced the then-upcoming demonstration of his perpetual-motion DeLorean.

My nanodots can fit inside your nanodots! Rocky Rawstern writes "I recently had the distinct pleasure to interview one of my favorite authors, Wil McCarthy. Upon completing three of his latest books - two sci-fi and one work of non-fiction - I realized that others would probably enjoy his ponderings as much as I. The questions for this interview stem from my own interest in programmable matter, and the awe-inspiring possibilities raised by Wil in his book Hacking Matter."

How to succeed (not necessarily) in business. jameshowison writes "A few months ago Ask Slashdot published Kevin Crowston's question on what makes open source software successful ... well the results are in and the paper typed. We ran the responses through a funky content analyser (called Grad Students). The metrics that academics and the industry have used for years simply don't work for OSS.

More and more it seems that we'll need to survey the number of job offers developers get and the size of the community to get at this one ..."

You sound very familiar to me. Interested Observer writes "Thanks to a slashdot article discussing false positives using Soundex I thought if Soundex can be used for something as important as "no-fly" lists then certainly we should be able to get some entertainment value out of it! See if your Soundex last name-counterparts show up in a Google News search."

A member of the USB-IF Administration writes to dispel the confusion raised by the seeming conflict between many USB products' labels and their actual data-transfer speeds:

"The source of confusion derives from the fact that USB specification revision numbers and data-transfer rates are often being used in place of the logo on consumer packaging, a purpose for which they were not originally intended. The USB-IF's recommended nomenclature for consumers is 'USB' for slower speed products (1.5 Mb/s and 12Mb/s) and "Hi-Speed USB" for high-speed products (480Mb/s), as signified in the USB logos that were introduced in late 2000. In short, consumers wishing to be certain they are getting the performance they paid for in their USB products can use the logo for clarification.

The USB-IF's naming and packaging recommendations for low- or full-speed USB products, as listed at the website http://www.usb.org/developers/packaging, state that such products can carry only the basic version of the USB logo, which simply states "Certified USB." We state clearly that manufacturers should avoid using terminology such as USB 2.0 Full Speed, Full Speed USB or USB 2.0. These formal recommendations were published to the USB-IF membership and posted on the website in August 2002.

The USB-IF is a nonprofit industry organization. We do not and cannot control how manufacturers label their products. We do work continuously with system and peripheral manufacturers, striving to provide consistency in the use of this nomenclature and the logos. The logo indicates that a product's performance against and conformance with the standard have been tested, and that the product has passed the USB compliance program.

Anyone having questions about the performance of a product should contact the manufacturer for clarification.

For a brief Q & A on this topic, please visit our website at http://www.usb.org/info/usb_nomenclature."

72 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Of course his "compound" was raided by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anytime you call something a compound, the government raids it. He should have called it a campus, or research park, or something

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Of course his "compound" was raided by realdpk · · Score: 5, Funny

      He also made the mistake of calling his device an "energy machine". He should have called it "Weapons of Mass Destruction". His compound would still have been raided, but at least they wouldn't have found anything.

    2. Re:Of course his "compound" was raided by YodaToad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, if he'd have named it a research park the government would have probably funded him, not raided him.

  2. Software patent report postponed by Sanity · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just received an email today from someone involved in this saying that "the meeting of the Secretary generals has postponed the report till September". Apparently it will now happen some time between the 1st and the 4th of September - which gives us more time to educate our MEPs.

    If you are an EU citizen and care about this don't wait for other people to take action - contact your MEP and make sure they are familiar with the issues! You can read my email to my MEP in my /. Journal and you are welcome to borrow ideas from it if you like.

    1. Re:Software patent report postponed by Halo1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      From what I hear though, there is little to fear. The EU patents on software won't allow any patenting of business methods
      That's what McCarthy wants you to believe, yes. However, her amendments say otherwise:
      Accordingly, a computer-implemented business method or other method in which the only contribution to the state of the art is non-technical cannot constitute a patentable invention.
      Now, whether or not something is "technical" is defined as whether or not something makes a "technical contribution". However, technical contribution is nowhere defined in the proposal! It only says:
      The technical contribution shall be assessed by considering the state of the art and the scope of the patent claim considered as a whole, which must comprise technical features, irrespective whether or not such features are accompanied by non-technical features.
      Now, that's really clear, isn't it? Surely, this non-definition won't be abused by anyone. Regarding your one-click example: the commission is not even sure itself whether or not it would be possible in the new proposal (see this FAQ, search for click).

      Anyway, things are looking actually quite good currently. Have a look at this press release, most MEPS are finally seeing that the proposal is completely wrong. I'm in direct contact with several people working with the MEPS and these people are really eager to learn as much as possible about the dangers of software patents.

      --
      Donate free food here
    2. Re:Software patent report postponed by steelneck · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can verify this, I also got a mail today from a Swedish MEP (Olle Schmidt) that said:

      Concerning JURI Committee reports for next's week plenary, please find below the modifications of the agenda adopted by the Conference of Presidents:

      First, for your information, to confirm that the McCarthy report on patentability of computer-implemented inventions will be in the agenda for the September plenary (doc A5-238/2003) and not now.
    3. Re:Software patent report postponed by Sanity · · Score: 2, Insightful
      clarifies the existing patent law across the European Union and makes it clear that only software which forms part of a technological process will be patentable.
      Point out that a "technological process" could be stretched to include virtually anything, and that this language will be totally ineffective in preventing patents on trivial software processes.
      This will allow patents to be provided for genuine technical inventions and stimulate European economic development in areas of economic strength like mobile telephony, digital television and computer controlled machine tools to name just a few possibilities.
      Explain that there have been no economic studies whatsoever which indicate that permitting software patents will stimulate innovation, while almost every analysis of the effects of software patents have concluded that they damage competition and innovation. One good example is the Fraunhofer Institute for Innovation Research study (http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bmwi-fhgmpi01/index. en.html).

      It isn't just academics that recognise the harmful effects of software patents. Who would know more about this issue than Bill Gates who said:

      If people had understood how patents would be granted when most of today's ideas were invented and had taken out patents, the industry would be at a complete standstill today. ... The solution is patenting as much as we can. A future startup with no patents of its own will be forced to pay whatever price the giants choose to impose. That price might be high. Established companies have an interest in excluding future competitors.
      The basic issue is that the software industry has thrived without software patents, and where they have been applied - they have only served to slow innovation and inhibit competition. European software developers need to be protected from software patents, not protected by them.
  3. Perpetual motion by agrippa_cash · · Score: 3, Funny

    Investigators from the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance raided the Tilley complex and wer head to say "In this state we obey the laws of PHYSICS!"

  4. tilly's woes by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This will be interesting.... as they will either announce to the world that it was all a scam, or in the court cases that will ensue, the entire process/design will become public and the world will change overnight....

    but the way this crackpot acted..... I'm interested how devilish his scam was....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:tilly's woes by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's not going to admit it was a scam. He was taking lots of money from private investors, telling them that he had this new magical source of energy. The amounts probably total in the millions of dollars. If he publicly admitted misleading investors, then he would be instantly convicted of fraud and go directly to jail (after a brief trial, of course). He is granted a right to not be forced to incriminate himself (the 5th amendment).

      However, there was a great suspicion that he has been committing fraud (magic isn't real). Therefore, the government goes in to gather evidence against him. They'll come up with enough evidence, try the guy for fruad, and hopefully send him to jail. The people who gave the crackpot money will still be out of luck though.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    2. Re:tilly's woes by cristofer8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alternately, once he discovers that his scam is about to be busted, he raids his own compound and cries that he couldn't finish his research because it's all been stolen. He then promply moves to the bahamas.

  5. "Magic Box" by jagilbertvt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can he not show us the inside of the box because then the cat will be dead?

    1. Re:"Magic Box" by The+Unabageler · · Score: 2, Funny

      probably

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
  6. If its real... by k03+blister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it is real, will he have legal grounds to take against the govt dept's of TN to recoup lost technologies. If so, is there a legal limit? For example, if it was real, and he wasn't generous about his technology, he would easily be one of the richest men on Earth.

    Can he sue them for a few trillion dollars?

    Its probably not real, but the implications of it being an actual working device are astronomical.

    --
    k03 - ne
  7. I understand that the EU is voting on software... by kevx45 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    patenting, but what exactly is their to vote about by-laws of what can and can't be patented, etc?

    That's my question.

    Kevin "KevX45" Myrick

    --
    "Now there's a look in your eyes, like black holes in the sky"-Pink Floyd
  8. Now taking bets... by The_Pey · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is seriously a lot of topics to even focus on in one go. My head is spinning just trying to decide on which topic to respond to... When faced with large numbers of topics to read and respond to, people as a large group will invariably choose the same ones and ignore others.

    So, I am now taking bets on which topic will be the unpopular one!

    My bet is the "My nanodots can fit inside your nanodots" story. **YAWN**

    Of course, by submitting this, I have now created a discussion thread on that topic, thereby invalidating my bet. DOH!

    --
    Hmmm...
    1. Re:Now taking bets... by palp · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's only a discussion if someone actually replies to it, and no one has. Er, shit. Nevermind.

      --
      -palp
  9. Open Source Free Energy? by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny
    C'mon Tilley. If you're not a fraud, you need to make your invention Open Source.

    The only chance you have is to let the genie out of the bottle and licence your device as GNU/Energy.

    You will become world famous overnight and will still make a fortune in grants, speaking engagements, and probably the Nobel Prize.

    Of course, if your just making stuff up and ripping people off, then I hope they send you to Federal "pound me in the ass" prison.

  10. Possibility of being sued ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear "FileSharingCommunity",

    In light of the fact the RIAA is suing everyone left and right and is now going after more individual users there is a potential that I might get sued. As I don't distribute copyrighted material, I don't know HOW this would be possible, but I'm not about to think the RIAA will do something as simple as "Follow the law". I'm sure there's something I've done wrong that can cause them to force me into a settlement.

    Anyways I expect this to cost somewhere in the ballpark of $130,230.34. That amount was literally randomly typed and it seemed like a real big amount. If I don't get sued, rest assured I will go forth and break the law because there really is no recourse for my actions. Even if I do "break the law" I can still count on the internet community to bail me out.

    The internet is such a great thing and thank you in advance!!

    SuperDuG

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  11. A perpetual motion car? by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 5, Funny

    What, are you supposed to just grab the door and climb in as it whizzes by, or what? Does it circle the 7-11 for you on autopilot while you're inside getting your Hostess cupcakes and lottery tickets?

    The mind boggles.

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:A perpetual motion car? by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      What, are you supposed to just grab the door and climb in as it whizzes by, or what? Does it circle the 7-11 for you on autopilot while you're inside getting your Hostess cupcakes and lottery tickets?

      Assuming that this guy isn't a crackpot, what makes you think that the perpetual motion would have anything to do with the movement of the vehicle? I'd guess his perpetual motion engine would be used as any other engine, except this one you wouldn't turn off. In other words, when you need to stop, you'd simply disengage the driveshaft. The perpetual motion machine would continue moving perpetually, you just wouldn't be translating that into rotation of the car's wheels.


      (Yes, I know the parent was supposed to be funny. I thought it was funny, too. Just thought I'd mention that, in case others took him seriously. Like that could happen.)

    2. Re:A perpetual motion car? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming that this guy isn't a crackpot

      Okay, here's the first thing newly hired patent reviewers of all patent offices in the world are told :

      If it says "perpetual motion" or "endless source of energy" anywhere in the patent application, grab the red stamp labelled "crackpot idea", stamp the patent application, send the application down the "rejected" chute and move to the next one. If you know nothing else, know how to do that.

      Perpetual motion is proven impossible. That's why the feds raided this guy, because asking investment money to fund research on perpetual motion is like screaming "I've got this great scam for you".

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:A perpetual motion car? by Compuser · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a physicist, let me assure you that perpetual
      motion has not been and never will be _PROVEN_
      impossible. That's not how science works. You
      cannot prove a negative. The most you can say is
      that we have yet to devise an experiment which
      would violate energy conservation law. Scientists
      never prove anything, they only disprove things,
      and concrete things at that (it is easy to show
      that this or that device conserves energy but it
      is impossible to generalize that without some
      sort of qualifiers).

    4. Re:A perpetual motion car? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >>"Perpetual motion is proven impossible."
      >Submarines, airplanes and rockets were all thought to be impossible at one time too.

      There is a big difference between "thought to be impossible" and "proven imposible". And the specific cases you mentioned, the "imposisbility" referred to practical engineering rather than theory. Just as I could say that it is impossible to make a battery that runs a car for a week -- it is impossible now, but that implies nothing about future technology.

    5. Re:A perpetual motion car? by nathanh · · Score: 4, Informative
      Perpetual motion is proven impossible.

      Wrong. A perpetual motion machine is impossible only if the laws of thermodynamics are correct. Unfortunately the laws of thermodynamics are based on human observation and humans make mistakes.

      Of course, there's plenty of supporting evidence for the current laws. So it's not very likely that they're wrong and subsequently it's not very likely that perpetual motion machines exist, but a good scientist never says never.

      A more correct statement would have been "a perpetual motion machine would destroy the laws of thermodynamics, cast doubt on thousands of experiments, and undermine physics as we know it, though that doesn't mean it's impossible".

      PS: I took tertiary level thermodynamics courses.

  12. Arg... by Duncan3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "150,000 signatures" ... "2000 company owners"

    But how much did you PAY the politicians to vote the way you want them to. Yea... I thought so...

    Geeks just don't get it.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Arg... by dago · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Er, you somehow messed up :

      EU : citizen elect politicians. Depending on that choice : politicians (usually left) favors national companies, ev. buy some shares, ... or, if opposite position, privatize, liberalize, and so on. state give (tax) money to parties and politician for campaings/...

      US : citizen elects politicians. companies give money to politicians. then, honestly, what will they favor ?

      Add to that the factor that you'll need (proportionaly) much more money to get elected in US ...

      Btw, to correct a few details
      - Airbus : As if boeing wasn't paying contributions to US politicians which accidently rose army's budgets ???
      - VW had to pay a few hundred billions euro fines a few years ago due to some fraud charge with the EU
      - Peugeot : it's a trademark law, not a patent. and it's based on international agreements. and this law (as the patent laws) do not favor specifically some companies over others.

      And btw, if you really want to dig up that and makes your final statement worth it, look at how things are going in Switzerland vs western europe for those points.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  13. Pay close attention to the names by poptones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On that EU petition. IBM is one of the most patent-laden companies in the US, yet some of their officers are signing onto a petition to prevent such a rush in the EU. What does this tell you about the US patent process? Patents and lawsuits are the price of doing business in the US. Meanwhile countries with more SANE "IP laws" are going to command more and more of the market share in an increasingly competetive world market.

  14. http://www.the-carrot-and-the-stick.com/ by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've got a better idea. Is there any way that maybe we could just send a letter to every "bulk emailer" and ask them to please stop. I don't think anyone has ever just asked them to stop and maybe we should. Perhaps we can offer them dinner and show to go with it, as they're just misunderstood.

    You want a "Plan for Spam" or a "End to all ends"??? Here ya go. You take all these lowlife scum bandwidth hogging email clogging horrible pieces of rat shit they are. Take them into the streets and beat them until they are a soupy mess on the floor that can only be cleaned up with a hose.

    AND TELEVISE IT, that way anyone else thinking about joining the industry can see the example of "what will happen to you" and find another way to make their dirty money. I say we throw telemarketers ans sex criminals in the same boat, all of them. Put um all together and just beat them with a small stick.

    That's my plan for spam. If we can bomb the hell out of a country for no reason then goddammit america can beat spammers to a pulp as well.

    So yeah, that's my plan.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:http://www.the-carrot-and-the-stick.com/ by Grax · · Score: 2, Funny

      The message said "This little pill will make your penis 3 inches longer". So I ordered 4 pills.

  15. USB Mess by redune45 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like we've gotten all worried over pretty well nothing.
    I admit I was upset to hear the news about the Pseudo USB 2.0, but looking at the logos that manufacturers are supposed to use, it looks like everything should make perfect sense.
    Glad to see its been all straightened out.

    --
    redune.com: The World 3.2 Megapixels at a time
  16. The Tilley story by vinsci · · Score: 4, Informative
    Look here for everything you ever wanted to know about Carl B. Tilley and his "invention", including video footage and the inside whistleblower story.

    For the rest of the site, uh, well, no comments. ;-)

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  17. Soundex? Holy crap! by peacefinder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After trying the Soundex tool, I am just bewildered how anyone could think this algorithim is appropriate for a no-fly list. Example:

    Name: Hughes
    Soundex code: H220
    Matches: haessig hages haggis haghighi hagos hajek hakes hasak hasas haschke hasegawa hasek hassick hassig haukaas hawkes haycock haycook heacock heacox hecox heikes heschke hescock heziak hickock hickok hickox higashi highshaw higuchi hikes hiscock hiscox hojczyk hojeij hokes hoosock hosack hosaka hoschek hoseck hosek hosick hossack hougas hoysock huges hugghis hughes hughs hugus husak husayko hykes housekeeper

    Hawkes? Housekeeper? Hickox?

    No wonder there's so many complaints!

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  18. Donate a dollar to Peng by loomis · · Score: 2, Informative

    (Accidently posted this AC the first time sorry)

    If many of us just sent $1.00 to Peng's fund we could make a big difference and help fight the RIAA instead of just complaining about them.

    I just sent a dollar. I realize it isn't much but I am unemployed.

    Donate a dollar right here.

    Thanks,
    Loomis

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
  19. cowboneal soundex by Gabrill · · Score: 2, Funny

    only returns 4 surnames.[p] cabinilla cabanillas chiappinelli cauffman [p] supercalafragilisticexpyalladocious returns 116

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  20. Electric Vechicles are Scary by Bocaj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At least to a US economy. It won't shock me if it turns out to be a hoax, but it probably scares some people that it might not be. This could be the basis for a push to the "raid the compound" stage instead of less aggressive measures. If the invention is not snake oil, the crude oil industry would like to know before it's released. I'm not screaming conspiracy, but it's realistic that people in oil would nudge investors and the govt. in this direction. "Hey, don't you want to know what he's doing with all that money?"

    Just suppose for a moment that he stumbled on easy cold fusion, and then actually started to produce a product. Then release the details the day before the product ships. There is no time for FUD, and the economy could go into a tail spin. People doubting the value of cars, oil, etc. I'm all for free energy, but don't start a fire under a snow covered tree.

  21. Re:You *have* to have a compound... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go to a bar, you lazyass! Sheesh, no wonder you never get dates. All you do all day is sit around in your compound, plotting world domination.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  22. Not only that... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...the implications of it being an actual working device are astronomical.

    ...the odds of it working are infinitessimal.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  23. Soundex and drivers license numbers by jms · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well that was interesting. I just did the soundex test, and the soundex code S450 sure looked familiar. That's because it's the first four characters of my Illinois drivers license number. Aha! I had been wondering about that part of the code for years.

    I now know that the coding (for males) is:

    aaaa-bbbc-cddd

    aaaa = soundex of last name
    bbb = ?
    cc = year of birth
    ddd = (month of birth - 1) * 31 + day of birth

    I seem to recall that ddd is altered for females.

    Anyone have a decoding for bbb? I'm guessing that it's just a serial number to ensure unique IDs.

    1. Re:Soundex and drivers license numbers by eightball · · Score: 3, Informative
      Try here

      I couldn't get it to match my state license, but you might have better luck...

    2. Re:Soundex and drivers license numbers by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 2, Informative

      bbb = ?

      I don't remember it exactly (got it written down around here someplace...) but this is created from the first and middle names.

      ddd = (month of birth - 1) * 31 + day of birth

      I seem to recall that ddd is altered for females.


      Add 600 if female.

      Here's a GWBASIC tool I wrote that calculates Illinois Driver's license numbers. Be kind; remember it's GWBASIC and note the date :-)

      There is no serialization in the number. Everything is calcualted from the name, gender, and birthdate of the individual. If I ever have twins, I plan to choose names that work out to the same driver's license number, just to see what happens (evil grin).

  24. Re:More Tilley Info by sebi · · Score: 2, Informative

    BTW, what is up with the formatting on Slashdot? The comment form REFUSED to accept the URL correctly, it kept putting a space in the word 'raid'. That sucks a lot, and there is no reason for it work like that. How can anyone post a URL?

    Slashcode automatically inserts a space after a certain number of characters. This is to keep long URLs (and trolls) from messing up the layout. You get used to it and remove the space after copying the address. If you want to make things convenient for others you could just use standard HTML linking:

    <a href="insert URL here">Descriptive Text</a >

    This way you get Those fancy links.

  25. Software Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Citizens might take vacation, but then Democracy does too. Most of the ugly things the Government
    wants to pass goes through "debate" during the summer, when all the blockbusters are coming on screen and entertainments are making their year profits.
    The only way to know that your representatives are doing a good job is to control their work at all time. It's a matter of citizenship, even if it does mean droping your hollidays for that matter.

  26. Mr. Tilley... by El · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exactly which part of the Laws of Thermodynamics did you not understand... that energy could be neither created nor destroyed, or that all systems tend towards maximum entropy?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Mr. Tilley... by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most proponents of ZPE and other such energy generators don't agree with the all systems tend towards maximum entropy part.

    2. Re:Mr. Tilley... by RodgerDodger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The "Laws of Thermodynamics" are a description of what is observed to happen to gases under experimental conditions. There's no real evidence that they scale out, you know, and a fair bit to hint that they don't. And even if they do apply, we know that they talk about what happens in the long term. They don't apply short-term.

      Hmmm... energy can't be created. What did the Big Bang do, then?

      Hmmm... systems tend towards maximum entropy, but over the medium term (like several billion years), it appears that there's a bias towards increasing complexity, actually.

      I mean, the universe, not long after the Big Bang, was a pretty high-entropy environment. Then things like stars and galaxies started coming out of the mix. And then you can get self-replicating systems that tend towards complexity as well.

      Heck, in any case, even if you can't get perpetual motion, there's nothing say you can't get "several million years" motion, is there? I'd settle for that.

      Besides, you have to realise it's kooks who come up with whacky ideas and find ways to achieve them. The first step to achieving the impossible is to think that "hey, maybe it is possible after all".

      (All that said, I think Tilley was a scam artist)

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    3. Re:Mr. Tilley... by tundog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I myself am a skeptic when it comes to absolutes, but if science calls it a LAW, then I'll go alongh with it. The scientific criteria for a law is pretty extreme.

      You see, we scientisits, unlike member of the USB consortium, don't base our conclusions on market surveys...

      Here's a quick review scientific method in order of refutability:

      Hypothesis
      Theory
      Law

      I find you argument that 3 LAWS of theromodynamics are invalid becuase of the big bang laughable.

      You do realize that what you saying boils down to "That scientific law can't be a law becuase of this theory over here", don't you?

      --
      All your base are belong to us!
    4. Re:Mr. Tilley... by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      actually, most scientific "laws" are approximations - for example, no real world material obeys Ohm's Law exactly, Boyle's law applies to no real world gas, etc. The difference between hypothesis, theory, and law is vague. As for the laws of thermodynamics, we don't even know if our universe is a closed or open system.....the laws are USEFUL, but are not TRUE in the absolute sense.

    5. Re:Mr. Tilley... by Ramze · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, the law is more like: energy can't be created or destroyed in the sense of "energy from nothing" and "nothing to energy", but it CAN be converted into matter -- and matter can be converted into energy. E=Mc^2 is the formula for conversion... and during an atomic explosion, a minute amount of matter is converted into energy -- just as a densely compact point of matter/energy exploded in the "big bang" and released an enormous amount of energy and proto-matter.

      The only experiment I know of that seems to defy this law is called the cassimir effect where two charged plates in a vaccuum tend to move towards each other even though the charges should repel them. I believe it was explained as some sort of quantum effect of particles and antiparticles appearing within the vaccuum and bouncing around putting pressure on the plates. (I believe its based on an antiparticle and particle emerging at once, bouncing around, then anhialating each other out of existence over and over). I don't put much faith in quantum theories, though.

      If there is an exception to the law, I bet it's such as mall effect as to be nearly unmeasurable -- certainly not enough to allow for enough energy to propel an automobile indefinitely. Unless this guy is reabsorbing heat, using some form of alternator, and using braking power to recharge the batteries, I can't imagine how he'd get even a fraction of the power back into the system he's using for motion.

      It'll be interesting to see what the feds turn up. I think if the guy was legit, he'd have patented his idea and showed it off to the public by now if it is a perpetual motion machine.

      One of my engineering professors said that thousands of people have applied for patents on supposed perpetual motion machines & even more had created businesses that suckered people into investing in such ideas, but there's always a flaw in the design b/c you just can't beat the laws of conservation of matter & energy (other than converting one to the other). If there's motion, there must be energy powering it somehow & if you're powering a motor with electricity, then that electrical potential will be converted to mechanical motion and heat. There's no way to convert 100% of that mechanical motion and heat back into electricity, so I see no way for his magic box to recover the energy the vehicle used. The only alternatives I can imagine that are practical are... he's cheating and recharging the vehicle somehow, or he has another power source.

      I admit there's a one in a trillion chance the wacko tapped into the power of a black hole in another universe to recharge his electric car, but... I doubt it ;-) Even then, it wouldn't be perpetual. It'd just have an emensely powerful power supply... Hey, who needs batteries when ya got that kinda power? lol.

    6. Re:Mr. Tilley... by nathanh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I beg to differ. Real world material DO follow Ohms law exactly.

      Actually, they don't. Laws are only ever approximations.

      It is only our inability to make scientific measurements with infinite precision that results in a certain margin of error.

      As our measurements improve we typically need to find new laws. For example, Newtonian physics was replaced by Einstein's physics purely because improvements in measurements started turning up things that didn't match the previous model. In other words, you've got it exactly backwards.

  27. Re:Fun with Soundex by sn00ker · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hmmm. According to the Soundex, I'm a haggis.

    Does that mean I'm not fit to fly?

    Dunno, but if you're not eaten or refrigerated I'm sure you'd be fit for the flies.

    --
    "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
  28. this what the EU dudes plan to do by BigBadDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...pass the law and get some patents before americans patent everything that is patentable (and beyond)

  29. Re:They must have thought he was crazy.. by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tilley is nothing but a slick huckster. The only thing he did wrong was get too greedy, and not skip out with the cash while he had the chance. Yes, I said cash. That's where all of the investor money was going.

    His little demonstration at the Nashville track last year...the car didn't even make it to theoretical distance available from just the plain car batteries. It had a "problem with the wheel bearing." It was going pretty slow before it stopped, too. Also they'd drive it, stop it to "check on it" and attach a voltmeter so the audience could see that the voltage wasn't going down. In fact, while they had the "voltmeter" terminals connected, the voltage was going up. Proof of an amazing breakthrough I say.

    His "explanation" of the "physics" behind his invention is the same "battery-popper" tripe that "alternative energy" scamsters have been pushing all along. They all involve big capacitors periodically pulsing high voltage into the battery at a certain frequency, which taps into some hitherto unknown energy in the atomic forces. Or some such crap. And it works with cheap, available car batteries! Convenient, because then they can keep the car batteries in plain sight.

    I'd rather buy a Sundance generator. At least those look kind of cool.

    --
    ...
  30. Re:You *have* to have a compound... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Women in bars laugh at me. Women in my compound who've been brainwashed by my evil plans are much friendlier.

  31. Delorian by mini+me · · Score: 5, Funny

    The DeLorian may be a perpetual machine, but it's maximum speed is 87mph. Anything over that and the car mysteriously disappears.

  32. Patents are law like everything else by hayden · · Score: 4, Informative
    A patent is a legal entitlement just like copyright, property ownership etc. Basically it is (or was originally) a government sanctioned monopoly on your invention. By patenting your idea the government gives you exclusive rights to work said invention. In exchange you or somebody else at your discretion has to work the invention or the patent lapses (in theory anyway, this doesn't happen very much) and you agree to release the invention into the public domain after a period of time so anybody can make it. This protects you from somebody seeing your invention and copying it and gives the public the advantage of your invention.

    Governments drew a line in the sand at what can and can't be patented. Discoveries can't (ie you can't patent Newtons laws) and algorithms can't either (which is why up until recently it was required to discribe software as an invention comprising of a computer with said computer having of display unit, random access memory, etc etc and then start talking about your software as part of this computer invention).

    The reason to not allow software patents follows in the same theme. Is it or is it not in the best interest of the public to allow patenting of software? Most software people would probably say no but unfortunately what's in the public interest and what makes money generally don't coincide.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  33. They don't need to.... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're all dead!

  34. What's wrong, energy man? by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Witnesses saw investigators "haul off Tilley's electric DeLorean, his electric boat and an electric ATV."

    Of course they had to haul off his vehicles. No intelligent person could expect them to be driven under their own power. ;-)

  35. Re:Moderation by Poeir · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's gone to meet people.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  36. Re:Yeah freakin right by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I could be very wrong, but I don't seem to recall Tesla being blacklisted or abused by the US Government. Taken advantage of by those he worked for? Yes. Stabbed in the back and then ignored by Edison? Yes. Victim of a massive government coverup? I wouldn't say so.

    As to the bit about him being made out as a 'crackpot', I'm not sure if that worked very well - Tesla is well known for his research and innovations to this day ( like, the, er, practical alternating current motor he designed in ~1888 ) - and a general education in physics or electronics will bring you into contact with the man and his ideas ( at least in my experience ).

    IMHO, the real crackpots are the ones who keep claiming they have discovered the 'lost weird science of Tesla' and 'Teslas unfinished overunity generator', usually right up the back of the 'new age' magazine along with the guy selling crystals from atlantis. Bleah.

    --
    One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  37. Good Exit Strategy For Tech Crackpots by istartedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're a tech crackpot claiming something impossible like PM, then getting raided by the Feds is the ideal exit strategy.

    If done properly, you can create a cult of dreamers and conspiracy theorists who will claim the Feds stole and suppressed your technology.

    Be sure to study the laws carefully before choosing this course. Choose something likely to net you less than a year in prison. Get a good lawyer. Chances are this is your first offense, so you should get off easy. However, be mindful of the judge who might try to "make an example out of you". Be cool while your case is pending. You don't want to get "Mitnicked".

    Then when you get out you do the circuit of late night talk radio, alternative newspapers, self-published newsletters, websites, books, and even college campus talks. Unless you're really famous you won't be rolling in dough from this; but you can survive and within certain circles there will be lots of people happy to give you free meals.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  38. Magic Box? by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Everyone knows descriptions as vague as a "magic box" is the heart of all hoaxes. Like Madison Priest from Florida. APPARENTLY, his "magic box" could supposedly transfer data over a phone line at phenomenial rates. Despite the fact that he almost NEVER drew complete schematics of his "work", and all demonstrations were in controlled environments, many companies were willing to invest in his efforts, even though he made a lot of lame excuses as to why he didn't meet deadlines, etc.

    Finally, he was convicted, but the ironic thing is, it was drug-related. In this nation, is it really that hard to convict someone of fraud, even when it's that apparent?

    Moreover, when do people ever learn? I didn't read Tilly's website real carefully, but he seems to claim that this is a car that generates electricity, but takes no electricity OR gasoline. Something about that is very hard to believe, yet, many people have invested. Apparently, they didn't bother asking for a fuel source, and just went on, hoping that the laws of thermodynamics would not hold true or something. Instead of a lawyer, these people should hire a physicist before investing in such things.

    Sure, there are "trade secrets", but then again, sometimes it's a curtain for a scheme to take place. That's what patents are for. If you have a brilliant idea, patent it. Then, you have nothing to fear as you reveal your brilliant idea to the world.

  39. Re:Black box by prockcore · · Score: 3, Funny

    Turns out he was just using a VCR and hiding a cable in the power cord.

    That's what always cracked me up. What did his investors say after they saw his demonstration?

    "Wow, your streaming video solution is amazing, but how do I adjust the tracking?"

  40. Re: plurals of compound terms by thing12 · · Score: 2, Informative
    The only other example I can think of is "court martial".

    You just have to love the Internet:

    When a noun is hyphenated with an adverb or preposition, the plural is formed on the noun.

    comings-in, fillers-in, goings-on, hangers-on, listeners-in, lookers-on, markers-up, passers-by, swearers-in

    When neither word is a noun, the plural is formed on the last word.

    also-rans, come-ons, go-betweens, higher-ups, run-ins, tie-ins

    In forming the plurals of compound terms, the significant word takes the plural form.

    Significant word first:

    adjutants general, aides-de-camp, ambassadors at large, attorneys at law, attorneys general, billets-doux, bills of fare, brothers-in-law, charges d'affaires, chiefs of staff, commanders in chief, comptrollers general, consuls general, courts-martial, crepes suzette, daughters-in-law, governors general, grants-in-aid, heirs at law, inspectors general, men-of-war, ministers-designate, mothers-in-law, notaries public, pilots-in-command, postmasters general, presidents-elect, prisoners of war, reductions in force, rights-of-way, secretaries general, sergeants at arms, sergeants major, solicitors general, surgeons general

    Significant word in middle:

    assistant attorneys general, assistant chiefs of staff, assistant comptrollers general, assistant surgeons general

    Significant word last:

    assistant attorneys, assistant commissioners, assistant corporation counsels, assistant directors, assistant general counsels, brigadier generals, deputy judges, deputy sheriffs, general counsels, judge advocates, judge advocate generals, lieutenant colonels, major generals, provost marshals, provost marshal generals, quartermaster generals, trade unions, under secretaries, vice chairmen

    Both words equally significant:

    Bulletins Nos. 27 and 28, (not Bulletin Nos. 27 and 28), (but Bulletin No. 27 or 28), coats of arms, masters at arms, men buyers, men employees, secretaries-treasurers, women aviators

    No word significant in itself:

    forget-me-nots, hand-me-downs, jack-in-the-pulpits, man-of-the-earths, pick-me-ups, will-o'-the-wisps
  41. RTFA:Of course his "compound" was raided by MickLinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    If anybody would have bothered to read the article, you'd know that his "compound" wasn't raided; his "complex" was raided.

    As a sometime English teacher, I must remind you that the difference between a "compound" and "complex" is huge: compounds have all the required parts in each section. Complexes have multiple instances of the same required parts, together

    That said, more than I'm inclined to believe our government raided him for making false statements to his investors [ummm, let's look at exhibit A, Kenneth Lay], I'm inclined to believe that our government thinks he violated the 2nd law of thermo, and can produce energy for free, and wants in on the action [exhibit B, Iraq].

    Idjits. [But we always knew that].

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  42. Tilley hype - Flash animation by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    Check out this hype from the Tilley Foundation. Best Make Money Fast animation in a while.

    This guy only made $500K off his scheme, over more than a decade. This was a low-rent scam. Makes me wonder if he believed his own hype. There are easier ways to make $50K/year.

  43. Usually perpetual motion scams just explode... by kobotronic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bet that getting his machines hauled away by the feds was probably not in the plan. They'll have some certified engineer take a glance at the black boxes and he'll the discover garden variety lead batteries hidden behind the "Flux Capacitor" panel where all the flashing LEDs are mounted. Scam over. He'll probably try again in a few years. Probably not with a DeLorean next time.

    Most of these schemes end with the Device mysteriously exploding on the big demo day just about the time the battery woulda run out. (The 'bad wheel bearing' thing on the race track demo seems to coincide with this pattern nicely. I recall one such demo where an onlooker got hurt or killed by the mandatory demo day explosion.

    Anyway, it's interesting that he had more than one vehicle. If he was intending to demo them all at the same time, that would have seemed to preclude a plausible demo day explosion unless the whole fucking garage was supposed to blow...

    It stands to reason that a genuine free energy invention would be a monumental world-changing discovery. Why tinker on a silly little gadget car in the garage, funded only by petty donations by smalltime individual investors? Think big! Nikola Tesla partnered with Westinghouse and demo'ed his monumental, world-changing Alternating Current system by harnessing the hydro power of the Niagara Falls, powering thousands of homes.

    Only a fool throws a dollar after a black box.

    Tesla had a system that actually worked, with both theories, engineering drawings and elaborate patent papers to back them up. At no point were Westinghouse and other corporate investors required to just believe his word when he claimed that his system worked. He let anyone visit his lab and play with his machines, none of which were black boxes.

    Patents, obnoxious such as they are, provide adequate protection against asset hijacking, the 'big secret' can be out in the open and well known, and you can still be the one who makes all the money from it.

  44. Which is the way progress is achieved. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can copyright an implementation of an idea, that is not going away.

    But patenting ideas is just plain stupid. You should be able to patent physical things, but patenting software is akin to patenting mathematics, i.i plain stupid.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  45. Re:A perpetual motion cat? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmmm...so what if a door were suspended and a dog placed on one side of it. Wouldn't the door start to rotate so that the dog was always on the wrong side of it??

    Brings to mind another perpetual motion idea: As buttered toast always lands butter side down, and a cat always lands on it's feet..if you strap a piece of buttered toast to a cat's back and drop it, the cat will continue to rotate in mid-air in perpetuity. :)

  46. Hmm, not so sure about that. by gosand · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you don't have a "compound, you're not a "cult leader". And if you're not a "cult leader", you're not allocated any "devoted followers". And if you don't have any "devoted followers" how are you supposed to get a date?

    Does Linus have a compound?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  47. Notes on Tilley by SolemnDragon · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here is a good page of random tilley stuff, including his ad hominem attacks on his critics. here are photos of a Tilley Vehicle from various angles.

    the photos of the various parts and signage for his 'building power system' are here. I think it's the book 'Voodoo Science' that includes a chapter on it, also? (i think. Have to go home and check.) But this guy's a treat. I'm not surprised to find out about the heist. I AM alarmed that this guy has any credibility at all, but i guess there's always someone willing to believe...

  48. Compound nouns by tez_h · · Score: 2, Informative

    Recent current events might have introduced you to commanders-in-chief, chiefs of staff, prisoners or war, and presidents-elect.

    You may be driving around, past a series of culs-de-sac, looking on at the passersby. You might be on your way to visiting sons-, brothers-, or even mothers-in-law.

    Then, in the evening, you munch on a couple of crepes suzette, chased down by a few gins and tonic. Finally, you turn on the TV to catch a pastiche starring all living Doctors Who.

    -Tez

    --
    Haskell, the static-typed, lazy, polymorphic, programming language.