Slashdot Mirror


RealNetworks Opens SMIL Implementation

Rob Lanphier writes "RealNetworks just released the source code to their SMIL 2.0 implementation (along with JPEG, GIF, PNG, and WBMP implementations) as part of the Helix Community initiative, under the OSI-approved RPSL. Some neat tricks to do with the code: superimpose images on top of video, or transition effects between videos, using standard W3C-defined markup. More tech details in the Helix community datatype project page, or look at the SMIL production topics page. A precompiled release with this code will be coming out very soon."

106 comments

  1. Biotech is really going Hollywood by mikeophile · · Score: 1, Funny

    Helix Developers Can Now Easily Create Helix DNA Client Products Supporting Synchronized Multimedia

  2. realone by Pompatus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean I can play real audio/real video files without realone? I hate installing that thing on my computer. However, alot of stuff is only available in that format, such as live audio of nfl games and clips from my friends local hip hop group (www.psychoward.com, yes it uses flash too, I tried to tell him, but nobody listens)

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:realone by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just curious, what's the beef with realone? if it works...

      that said, any player that supports SMIL will be able to utilized the technology.

    2. Re:realone by gantrep · · Score: 1

      Don't criticise too harshly.
      You neglected to make www.psychoward.com a hyperlink.

    3. Re:realone by Pompatus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personal preference I guess. And the fact they wanted some kind of survey filled out in order to download it.

      I'm currently using BSPlayer and love it. Now my beef with flash, on the other hand, could fill up your screen

      --

      ----
      Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    4. Re:realone by JimDabell · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. SMIL is like an XML-based Flash, developed by the W3C.

    5. Re:realone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wait, I thought SVG was an XML-based type of Flash? Now I'm confused.

    6. Re:realone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is loser.

    7. Re:realone by JimDabell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, no not really. SVG is an XML vector graphics format. You can embed vector graphics in Flash presentations, but there's a lot more to it than that.

    8. Re:realone by jd142 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Realone is a lot better than the previous version of RealPlayer. RealPlayer made it incredibly difficult to stop it from loading on boot. When you went into preferences to turn it off, you got a message that sounded like turning off the startcenter would make your computer stop working correctly. The start center was also responsible for random crashes.

      We went through a period at work where the soultion to every crash was to remove the start center.

      But as I said, Real One is a lot better. Now the only problem is that they really push you to the non-free version on their website.

    9. Re:realone by Hatta · · Score: 1

      MPlayer does realvideo fine.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:realone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still a piece of shit, marginally better than QuickTime for Windows. It still pops up stupid messages, even when you turn everything off, and remove the Run keys. Speaking of the registry, have you EVER seen ANYTHING nastier than the Real tree? Fuck man, that's some spectacular voodoo there.

    11. Re:realone by llin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Helix's helix-client site. There've been some early developer release binaries available for quite some time.

      For real world use, you're probably better off using something like mplayer w/ the realplayer-codecs or if you're using Windows, something like JetAudio, or as others have mentioned, Media Player Classic + Real codecs

    12. Re:realone by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      >>Does this mean I can play real audio/real
      >>video files without realone?

      No. SMIL is a language for describing how different media elements relate. It looks kind of like this:

      (CAVEAT: I haven't used SMIL since we played around with it doing webcasting in 1999; it may have changed since then)

      It defines spatial and temporal relations between multimedia elements. The media elements themselves, like the Real Audio file you mentioned, still need to have a player that can play them.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    13. Re:realone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Available"? Yeah right - if you sign the EULA and give up your
      * Title
      * Street Address
      * City
      * State (if USA)
      * Region or Province (if other than USA)
      * Postal Code
      * Country
      * Company or Personal Web Site URL
      * Phone Number

      In _addition_ to a working email address.

      Errr... Open Source? No thanks, I'll pass...

    14. Re:realone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "working" email addresses are a dime a dozen at hotmail.com and everything else can be fake.

      i'm suprised your able to post on slashdot.

    15. Re:realone by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a single stupid/annoying/frustrating/etc message out of RealOne since I first installed it several months ago. However, I am on a Mac, and the Windows version may very well be much worse. PS. I love QuickTime for Mac, and hate QuickTime for Windows!

    16. Re:realone by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Now my beef with flash, on the other hand, could fill up your screen

      Me too -- but at the same time I always liked the *potential* of Flash to produce nice interfaces (a pity it was an _unrealised_ potential, i.e. people used it to produce ads and nasty interfaces, but I digress).

      But then I found the Flash Click To Play extension for Moz Firebird, and now I'm happy with Flash again. I _never_ will have to see another flash ad (unless I want to), and I can watch flash movies whenever I want to. And someday, who knows? I might even find that someone's finally coded up a decent UI in flash :-).

      -Billy

  3. SMIL? Don't talk to me about SMIL by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Informative
    The problem with SMIL files is not the implementation of the filespec, but the way that phones deal with them.

    I work with SMIL files on a download platform and the biggest problem is the poor implementation by the manufacturers.

    So far, the only phones that use SMIL's correctly are the SonyEricsson T68i, T610, P800 and the SAGEM MY X-6. Other SMIL capable phones either:

    1. Pop up a message "unknown format"
    2. Show you only the first frame
    3. Force you to manually advance through each frame by pressing a button (all Nokia's do this)
    SMIL's will only get popular if the handset manufacturers can implement it correctly - and so far, they haven't.
    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:SMIL? Don't talk to me about SMIL by smallpaul · · Score: 1, Funny

      SMIL's will only get popular if the handset manufacturers can implement it correctly - and so far, they haven't.

      This is a little bit like saying that HTML will only get popular if the handset manufacturers can implement it correctly. SMIL is not for phones. It can be used on phones, as can HTML or MP3 or JPEG, but it can also be used anywhere else. Consider the number of implementations out there. Only a small subset are for phones.

    2. Re:SMIL? Don't talk to me about SMIL by tsvk · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are confusing the SMIL used in mobile handset multimedia messages (MMS) and SMIL in general. SMIL wasn't created for MMS purposes, it's the other way around: MMS uses SMIL to define presentation.

      But MMS messages use a only a very limited subset of SMIL to define the MMS presentation. Currently an MMS is a SMIL slideshow where you link a picture, some text and a sound together for each slide (= par element), (example markup here). As you mentioned, all the Nokias ignore the timing information, etc. so the SMIL implementations by the handset makers are rather incomplete. But they very well may be so because to be MMS-conformant, they don't have to support all of SMIL.

  4. Platform4 player by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Informative
    Although it doesn't support SMIL v2, Philips Platform4 player is a better player (IMO) to the Real one. It also copes with a number of other formats.

    http://www.mpeg-4.philips.com.

    Windows and PPC only I'm afriad.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Platform4 player by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      So I go onto the Philips site to get the PPC version, then find that you meant Pocket PC. Usually the term "PPC" means "PowerPC" (which is what I have).

  5. Links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody have a link to the WMA version? tia

  6. Gotta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give Real some respect for this. I don't see Microsoft opening up .asx, or whatever the hell kids are using these days.

  7. Worst markup ever by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some sample W3C-approved markup from an image:

    <image type="image/gif">
    <pixels>
    <pixel xcoord="0" ycoord="0">
    <phosphor color="red">15</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="green">60</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="blue">20</phosphor>
    </pixel>
    <pixel xcoord="1" ycoord="0">
    <phosphor color="red">14</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="green">60</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="blue">20</phosphor>
    </pixel>
    ...
    </pixels>
    </image>

    Using this method, the Slashdot logo takes up over 500 kB. Maybe it will be reduced using gzip, but I'm not buying into it for now.

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:Worst markup ever by Cyno · · Score: 1

      And THAT is what capitalists call innovation. I mean, just look at it, images embedded directly into HTML. Doesn't Amazon already have a patent on this?

      Us geeks who have to write this stuff know it sucks ass. But can you imagine how many HTML web monkey can get their jobs back when they have to write out those images pixel by pixel. This could respark the dotcom boom.

  8. RealNetwork source code? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Download source code.
    2. Skips advertisements.
    3. Start compiling.
    4. Enter email adress.
    5. Continue compiling.
    6. Ignore hordes of incoming spam.*
    7. Install software.
    8. Look at crappy videos from companies/people too stupid to use a decent codec.

    * = Only if user is retarded enough to enter a real email adress.

    1. Re:RealNetwork source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahaha! So what do you consider to be a decent codec then?

    2. Re:RealNetwork source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real the CODEC, yes. Real the Company? No.

    3. Re:RealNetwork source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they weren't such evil, they couldn't stand with MS attacking :)

      "Evil VS Evil, who wins?" situation :D

    4. Re:RealNetwork source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehe

      Fair point :)

    5. Re:RealNetwork source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True :)

      Given that if any of Ellison, McNealy, Glaser or Jobs were given the opportunity to whereby they had as much power/influence as Gates/Ballmer, the situation as it stands now would probably not be all that much better at all.

    6. Re:RealNetwork source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at crappy videos from companies/people too stupid to use a decent codec.

      Whoa, whoa, whoa. Don't you ever call Page 3 Video Shoots crappy!

  9. MOD PARENT FLAMEBAIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, this doesn't make sense. If the image is type "gif", why would you specify every single pixel? It wouldnt be a gif, then, would it? Fucking MORON troll flamebait IDIOT

    1. Re:MOD PARENT FLAMEBAIT by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I was shooting for "funny" by mocking the W3C's preference for verbose XML-based markup.

      The fact that such an obvious fake was marked "informative" doesn't shock or surprise me.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  10. On a side note... (a little OT) by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is it just me or does Real make it unreasonably difficult to download their player? It seems to me that if you want to encourage proliferation of your media format, you don't want to force users to go through a dozen or so clicks on your web site and then ask for a credit card number when issuing a trial! Since Real stopped offering a free player, I no longer bother with the format. Dealing with all the players in nonsense enough, I do not need the added hassle or even financial burden of paying for another one. You might want to consider encouraging your friend to switch to something a little more accessible. Of course, this all could have changed in the past couple months. As far as I remember however, Real required payment for a media player (absurd, I don't even pay for an OS).

    1. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by CptChipJew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Real still offers the free player. They just make it hard to find on the site, as they always have. Typically, 99% of the site is a bunch of big graphics and text advertising their free services, and some font size=1 text with a link to the "Basic Player". I can't even remember a time when the Basic player was easy to find on the website. Here are the links to download the free player:

      MacOS X
      Windows

      So yeah, it's there, you just have to look carefully. I'm not sure whether this is smart marketing or not, but they've always done it this way.

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    2. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I said "free services", I meant "non-free services" ;)

    3. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by wheany · · Score: 1

      They DO offer a free player. Just look for the really small "download our free player" in some corner of the HUGE "download a trial version of the full player" -page.

    4. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by zdislaw · · Score: 3, Informative
      This is totally fucked up. I've worked on a site for over five years that streams video using Real. The way they try to trick people into paying for a player is totally unethical. But check your facts. they do still offer a free player.

      Here's the thing: You don't have to give your credit card number. If you were asked for a credit card number, they tricked you. You were trying to download the trial version of the full RealOne player, not the free version.

      To download the free version, you need to click the [incredibly tiny] text link near the upper right corner of real.com and not the big orange button on the page that says "DOWNLOAD NOW - FREE" (read the fine print..."FREE 14 day trial."). Then is takes you to a second page where they try to trick you into downloading the trial version. Don't be fooled, click the text link at the lower left corner "Download the Free RealOne Player."

      Believe it or not, this is an improvement! They have taken about three clicks out of the process.

      The only info you need to give them is a [fake] email address, [fake] first name/lasname, [fake] gender (of course), bday and secret question.

      I'm not a huge fan of the player, but it does pretty well and is very widely implimented. The company sucks eggs and I wish nothing but ill on them.

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
    5. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      around 1995-1996.

      when the first internet radios started popping up.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this practice of advertising 'free' software and then making it nearly impossible to find that software on your website is quite common these days - ever try to find the 'free' version of Red Hat Linux on redhat.com ? You *can* find it - after about 20 minutes or so - but jeez, what a friggin pain in the ass.

      Does this kind of thing fall under any federal 'false advertising' rules? Or, can companies basically attempt the 'frustration-bait-and-switch' technique without intervention? Frankly, I'm sick of this shit - if a company advertises a free product, and its nearly impossible to find, I move on. Screw Real, screw RedHat.

    7. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real.com is a subscrition service. The company is RealNetworks. Go to realnetworks.com and you will have no problem downloading all the free products. No tricks, just software.

    8. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      no, it offers free player. You disable all those online feautures, its not "spyware" anymore.

      Bitch about Real Networks on Slashdot, it will give you karma... Heh

    9. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by H310iSe · · Score: 1

      Adding to the list of ways to avoid the Real player, I use Winamp with the Tara audio/video plug-in which allows me to stream realaudio through Winamp. You still need some version of Real Audio installed though.

      Why not use the Real player? The old Real Audio tied the audio slider directly into the sound mixer in Windows (so if you turn down the player it turns down ALL wave audio on the PC). The new realOne seems to be nothing but annoying attempts to get me to buy it. I'll follow some of the above links and see if I can find a decent free copy. At least they stopped that trick during registration where they subscribe you to mailings by putting the prechecked selections below the scroll window.

      All in all I don't trust Real Audio, the company, due to their persistent tricks with their player and try to avoid them whenever possible.

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    10. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      And here's the Linux one.

      (I hope no session keys are embedded in that URL...)

    11. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by kkhawi · · Score: 1

      That one is _very_ buggy. Try to find the older version, which IIRC
      is still floating around on Unix centric servers (google for a personal
      site, on an Australian university, I used that version for close to
      two years.)

      This latest official release forced me to reboot my machine, after being up for 70 something days, and I removed it altogether.

    12. Re:On a side note... (a little OT) by zdislaw · · Score: 1
      At least they stopped that trick during registration where they subscribe you to mailings by putting the prechecked selections below the scroll window.

      That was the worst. My new annoyance with the RealOne player: It now takes a lot of effort to get rid of (can you even do it?) that horrible popup alerting you to new promotions or downloads available. I haven't looked into it much, but there is definitely no easy way to tell it to go away, and never come back.

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
  11. Flash Replacement? by paugq · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can it be used as a Macromedia Flash replacement? :-?

    1. Re:Flash Replacement? by rexguo · · Score: 4, Informative

      To begin with, you will need to be able to read SWF files directly. After that, you need to implement a better renderer than Flash's vector engine. After which you need to mirror ActionScript's functionality in SMIL, probably as an extension. Finally, you need a content creation tool that's very much like Flash's IDE to have a smooth migration tool for Flash developers.

      --
      www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
    2. Re:Flash Replacement? by smallpaul · · Score: 3, Informative

      To begin with, you will need to be able to read SWF files directly. After that, you need to implement a better renderer than Flash's vector engine. After which you need to mirror ActionScript's functionality in SMIL, probably as an extension. Finally, you need a content creation tool that's very much like Flash's IDE to have a smooth migration tool for Flash developers.

      First, SMIL is not intended to be a Flash replacement. The W3C set of standards are very modular so you would put several of them together to do the sort of things Flash does. SMIL alone is not even close. But then I doubt Flash is very close to SMIL. As far as ActionScript: SMIL is a Web technology. Of course you can use ECMAScript/Javascript with it.

  12. Presentation software by smallpaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SMIL+SVG is the most logical output format and interchange format for Open source presentation programs. It would be terrific if they could get together to turn Mozilla into a standards-based multimedia presentation delivery platform.

  13. SMIL is the first true multimedia XML sibling by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Informative

    I worked with SMIL on some Multimedia and E-learning projects. And I must say: Allthough Realplayer looks like someone did doo-doo on your screen and their interpolation algorithms and scaling was really crappy back then (and Flash ruled everywhere) the actuall intention and scope of this language is somewhat sophisticated. It goes from simple Text and Hyperlinks all the way thourgh to serious layering and Video output.
    I'd actually trust SMIL to become the 'ogg' of multimedia data and Realplay with their opening Helix initiative seem determined to actually doing something usefull to the OSS community.
    Let's hope it turns out well.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  14. Digital Genlock! by usotsuki · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now when one can use markup to subtitle an AVI (MJPG codec) with purely free software, I'm going to jump on the bandwagon bigtime - gotta have my Sailor Moon!

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    1. Re:Digital Genlock! by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Off-topic? Oh, puh-LEEZE!

      Some neat tricks to do with the code: superimpose images on top of video, or transition effects between videos,

      A genlock superimposes text on top of video. There is a program for Win16 and Win32 already which can make the subtitles, and I was just commenting that I would have liked to see a way to do it using tools like this.

      Pardon the slashbot-ism, but I have to say that IMHO, TMAOC again.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  15. TANSFAL even in free software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Software embodies a serial copying management system required by the laws of the United States. You may not circumvent or attempt to circumvent this system by any means.

    AC> Since when (and how) does the US Congress
    AC> mandate copy protection of Real1's basic
    AC> player software?

  16. SVG is the "Flash replacement" by Pippity · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, the W3C spec that most closely matches the functionality of Flash is SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics). It includes high quality vector graphics and effects as well as animation and scripting.

    Note that this doesn't mean that it can play .SWF files, it merely provides more or less equivalent functionality.

    1. Re:SVG is the "Flash replacement" by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yes, spread the word. SVG is also a good nonproprietary replacement for PDF.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:SVG is the "Flash replacement" by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      gah. PDF is an open standard with many free implementations. just because it originated in a company it does not mean it is not free. It is actually a very nice format.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    3. Re:SVG is the "Flash replacement" by killthiskid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have to do a plug for a free service I've used Texterity. I had a series of very complex PDF files that were saved from PageMaker to PC format PDFs under Macintosh. I was unable to open the file in Illistrator on the PC, and I needed to get the document in a form I could use from with XSL:FO so that I could make it part of a process that created a PDF from a predefine document that added some data and formatting. Using thier service, I was able to take the SVG they created from the PDF and included as an inline SVG object in an FO XML doc which I then served up real time as a PDF file online.

      PDF forms dynamically filled with data using FOP from the Apache project!

      The really cool thing was the seamless conversion of the fonts involved into glyphs in the SVG file. DAMN! They did good. Check 'em out. Disclaimer: I am in no way involved with them other than being a user of their great free service.

  17. Not clearly free by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    While the OSI think the RPSL is Free, there's some disagreement on debian-legal. The primary issue is probably clause 2.1(d) which requires that changes be made publically available. Now, if you're a political dissident, you may want to modify existing code to some end not encouraged by your government. Under the GPL, you only need to provide your modifications to those that you trust - under the RPSL, you need to provide your modifications publically, which may be equivilent to a big sign saying "Please arrest me, Mr Totalitarian Government"

    This is a contrived examples, but it's something that should be possible under a Free license - if you can't do that, then it suggests that the license isn't entirely Free.

    (Yes, the idea of a group of political dissidents being worried about strict conformance to the license their code is under is a stupid one. But that's not the point - they ought to be able to modify the code and conform to the license without it then putting their lives at risk more than is strictly necessary)

    Strictly speaking, it's probably against clause 3 of the DFSG as well - the unmodified code can be distributed without having to provide source publically, but the modified code can't.

  18. Hey, I resent that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if user is retarded enough to enter a real email adress.

    I use a real email address. But then again I use "michael@slashdot.org"

  19. You might want to try this. by MeanE · · Score: 3, Informative

    The people of Kazaa Lite fame (if I am not mistaken) created this nice little package called Real Alternative which is Media Player Classic and the Real codecs package in one.

    Play those nice Real movies without the cruddy Real player!

  20. Parent is over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SMIL has almost nothing to do with cell phones! Who cares about the SonyEricsson T68i???

  21. Real by huntz0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    A precompiled release with this code will be coming out very soon."

    As soon as it finishes buffering.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
  22. But think of the flexibility!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You could also do an image like this:

    <image type="image/gif">
    <pixels>
    <pixel xcoord="0" ycoord="0">
    <phosphor color="yellow">15</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="cyan">60</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="magenta">20</phosphor>
    </pixel>
    <pixel xcoord="1" ycoord="0" shape="round">
    <phosphor color="black">14</phosphor>
    <phosphor color="white">60</phosphor>
    </pixel>
    ...
    </pixels>
    </image>

    See? You can have per-pixel control of the colorspace you are in, and even specify different pixel shapes!! You can mix monochromatic pixels right next to RGB or print space pixels!! It's the ultimate in imaging flexibilty!!

    Implementation of said spec is left as an interesting exercise to cell-phone makers dealing with really low CPU power.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:But think of the flexibility!! by generic-man · · Score: 1

      You forgot to include all the pretentious administrative crap like "This index is normative. This standard may be superseded by any number of future standards at an arbitrary point in time." Use lots of CSS to make every one of those boldfaced terms a different color.

      No, I'm not bitter about reading those awful standards documents...

      --
      For more information, click here.
  23. I wonder by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    I really wonder the first moron to claim RealOne player is spyware, on this topic.

    Also pointing me down is kinda same thing. Thats why I don't use "no karma bonus" button unchecked first time.

  24. Get JetAudio by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    I use JetAudio to play Real audio / video files. It doesn't work as a plugin (I think) but I just save the files to my HD then play them back later. It's SO worth it not to have that ad-ware annoying piece of CRAP on my system. This program has no ads and lots of features I never use. It's not annoyned me or poped up anything after 5 months.

    FREE Real Audio/Video Player

    It also plays other formats, but I usually use Winamp for everything else.

  25. Easy way to find free player by robla · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the URL to the free player:

    http://www.real.com/freeplayer/

    No, we don't require payment for the player.

    Rob

  26. Re:Easy way to find free player (mod parent up) by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the clarification. This has been a huge source of frustration for me in the past so much that I just completely gave up and decided to never bother with content from Real streams. I don't know what pull you have over there, but here's my experience going to your web site today.

    1. I see graphics pointing me towards RealOne. It says you can get a 14 Day Trial. Immediately I fear I have to shell out money for a media player (despite the endless "Free" text). I found a link reading "FREE RealOne Player" that takes me to a page where I need to shell out $20. This is horrible, Rob.
    2. When I navigate to the 14 Day Trial nonsense, I am asked for a login. It demands I register. Already I don't like this... now I have to have yet another account on another random site which I can only assume will deliver more random spam to my inbox.
    3. Usually, I'd just leave and not put up with this nonsense. But, for the sake of science, I proceed to create a new user account. Asks for a first and last name, password, and a password reminder. That's not so bad. Next screen...
    4. Your web site then asks me for my personal information short of my life history. In addition, it asks for a credit card number. Rob, this is bologna. Fuck it, I'll go download Windows Media Player or QuickTime instead. (Well, I wouldn't... I don't run Windows. Many other people will.) Each of those required no more than 30 seconds of my attention and bandwidth to get to an actual download link. Much better than what Real offers (which is nothing short of " please don't use our product").


    I call this "Four Easy Steps To Defeating Potential Customers", and since Real has enacted these steps, I've completely stopped using their software.

    You have pointed out a very easy link to get to the free software. Nevertheless, the average user out there is not going to stumble upon this Slashdot thread. Real is Really stupid for making it so hard to get to their media player (I keep emphasising that because this isn't something you should make hard to get or even charge for -- it's an avenue for your marketing and I don't want to fit the bill for that).

    Whoever it is at Real that thought out your marketing flow is a real dipshit. You should never make customers work for you. There's a dozen alternatives to this in hooking customers. If people can actually get your software, they will more likely become customers. At this stage, you don't even give them that much.
  27. Worst [beating] ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Us geeks who have to write this stuff know it sucks ass. But can you imagine how many HTML web monkey can get their jobs back when they have to write out those images pixel by pixel. This could respark the dotcom boom."

    US geeks are machovist (They use EMACS, for God's sake). There are tools that allow someone who's in it for the job, and not just the geek factor to deal with the verbosity that W3 standards generate.

  28. Rember RealNetworks has only official *NIX player by benwaggoner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Folks seem to have a lot of bitterness towards RealNetworks. I certainly agree the download process is self-defeatingly difficult. But of the Big Three propritary formats, RealNetworks is the only one shipping a *NIX player. It's community supported only, but is really pretty good, and they provide downloadable updates to the latest.

    Real also provides authoring tools for Linux, albeit command-line only.

    Also, the Real codecs are really quite nice. RealVideo 9 is second only to Windows Media Video 9 in terms of compression efficiency, and performs better on lower end machines. The audio codecs are getting a little long in the tooth, but are still more than adequate for real-time streaming applications.

  29. Re:Easy way to find free player (mod parent up) by robla · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since I agree with much of what you say, the answer to your implied question: "I don't know what pull you have over there..." is "obviously, not a lot". ;-)

    I will forward your comments on, though. One thing that would be very helpful is posting your comments on our official comment form.

    Rob

  30. Re:Rember RealNetworks has only official *NIX play by 31+Flavas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Also, the Real codecs are really quite nice. RealVideo 9 is second only to Windows Media Video 9 in terms of compression efficiency, and performs better on lower end machines. The audio codecs are getting a little long in the tooth, but are still more than adequate for real-time streaming applications.

    Check out doom9.org forums, specifically, the "new A/V format" forum. THE Senior Codec Engineer of RealNetworks posts daily there. He does it on his own free time and even lets the forum readers in on pre-release fuctions and code.

    Specifically, EHQ encode mode, RealAudio 5.1 audio, and the Animation DropDupe Pre-filter are all new capabilites being discussed there. EHQ mode gives upto 30% improved compression efficiencey and the DropDupe pre-filter provides for variable frame rate encodeing of animation/cartoons, that plays back as if encoded at 24/30 fps, so since repeated frames are droped instead of being encoded, you save diskspace.

    The cream of the crop, so to say, though would be the DirectShow filter for RealMedia.

    Also a lot of discussion has gone on about the marketing department of RealNetworks being utterly retarded, which from as a result of the forum and internal pressure, has been made to relize a lot of their faults. Version 3 of the RealOne player we are told will be really nice (as in getting rid of ads and such).

  31. Just like the Grinch by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

    I won't touch anything from Real with a 10 foot pole.

    Is anyone else taking this stand against the most annoying company on the internet? (IMO)

  32. Oh bother... by Theatetus · · Score: 1

    The tags appeared when I previewed... grrr...

    SMIL looks like this, I meant to say:

    <par>
    <img src="foo.gif">
    <seq>
    <video src="bar.ram">
    <img src="quux.png">
    </seq>
    </par>

    Only imagine lots more attributes specifying duration, position, z-index, alpha, etc...

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  33. Re:Easy way to find free player (mod parent up) by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    If I had known this would get passed up to someone, I would have been a little less crass. :)

  34. SMILGen by belial · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just to add a note, if you're interested in authoring SMIL, but fear hand-editing,

    http://www.smilgen.org/

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/smilgen

  35. I wanna see DOOM3 implemented in this!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOOO portable!!! No need for assembly or c++ again!!!!
    A breakthru in portable game development!

    1. Re:I wanna see DOOM3 implemented in this!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, with a gigibit computer with a terabyte of video ram, 10 terabytes of ram, and a 100 petabyte hard drive, this should run fine on your browser....
      In fact, even java may finally run at a decent speed...but maybe that's wishful thinking....

  36. The problem with Real is the player sucks.... by gsa700 · · Score: 1

    The problem with Real networks is that the player sucks....

    --
    "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
    1. Re:The problem with Real is the player sucks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The player is open source - if it sucks, but you want to view their proprietary media, then improve the player.

  37. Re:Easy way to find free player (mod parent up) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I will be crass. I avoid the Realplayer and encourage everybody else to do the same.

    If Real would place a link on their site that would lead STRAIGHT to their freeplayer, then I'd rethink my position.

  38. SVG is the "Flash replacement"-GIF gump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "gah. PDF is an open standard with many free implementations. just because it originated in a company it does not mean it is not free. It is actually a very nice format."

    And GIFs originated with a company, and had many free implimentations.

    Thanks for being proof of that old saying. "Those who forget history are doomed to repeating it."