'Extraordinary' Soundtrack Will Be Apple-Exclusive

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

'Extraordinary' Soundtrack Will Be Apple-Exclusive

Posted by timothy on Monday July 7, 2003 @10:33AM from the five-parsadigm dept.

Isbiten writes "Apple has just gotten the rights to the soundtrack of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. There will be no physical CD and it will only be available from the iTunes Music Store. Cnet has the story."

19 of 161 comments (clear)

wow by Anonymous Coward · 2003-07-07 10:33 · Score: 5, Funny

This is about as exciting as having dibs on the digitally remastered soundtrack to Highlander II.
What if? by wowbagger · 2003-07-07 10:39 · Score: 4, Interesting

What if I prefer to buy my music in a more lasting form?

What if I prefer my music to be compressed with FLAC?

What if I prefer to compress my music with MY parameters, to meet MY standards of audio fidelity?

While I am all for Apple being able to distribute this electronicly, while I can accept Apple being given sole electronic distribution rights to this music, I don't like that this won't be available as a plain ol' CD.

--
www.eFax.com are spammers
1. Re:What if? by Elwood+P+Dowd · 2003-07-07 10:52 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  What if...
  
  Then don't buy it.
  
  --
  
  There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
2. Re:What if? by switcha · 2003-07-07 11:00 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Music is art.
  Just because you are used to one way of purchasing/enjoying art, doesn't make other methods 'unfair'.
  What if I prefer to buy my music in a more lasting form?
  So should sidewalk chalk artists not be allowed to make drawings?
  What if I prefer my music to be compressed with FLAC?
  So, should publishers not be allowed to print a book in whatever size they want, then distribute it on tape/cd/ebook/etc if they want?
  What if I prefer to compress my music with MY parameters, to meet MY standards of audio fidelity?
  So should a painter have to check with the buyer before he decides oil versus pastels, canvas versus illustration board, small versus mural, etc.?
  Sure you can hang it/display it/listen to it wherever you want once you get it home, but as to where you can buy art, it's not 'unfair' that you have to go to a gallery contracted to sell the piece. Art isn't public domain (despite p2p advocates). It's a product, and if you choose to enjoy it, you are stuck with how the artist/rep choose to let you partake in it.
  
  --
  You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
3. Re:What if? by dhovis · 2003-07-07 11:00 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  The way you talk, you'd think CDs were perfect reconstructions of the original music.
  
  What if I prefer to get the original master tapes?
  
  What if I prefer to create my own mixes of every song?
  
  What if I prefer surround sound?
  
  Every audio format out there has limitations, even CDs. For the price, you can't complain too much. Personally, I'd like to see Apple keep the singles price at 99 cents and drop the typical album price to $4.99. Given the info that leaked about Apple's meeting with the indie music labels, I think that is what Apple would like too. At that price point, it would be hard to complain too much about the audio quality unless you are really psycho.
  
  --
  --
  The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.
4. Re:What if? by n.wegner · 2003-07-07 11:19 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  >Art isn't public domain
  
  To paraphrase the US constitution:
  
  Culture is the public domain. Art is one form of culture, and culture contributes to art. The public has the right to freely enjoy its culture. The US constitution makes it very clear that copyright is only granted, for a limited time, to reward the public for creating and expanding the public domain, and the public's culture. The burden of proof lies with you.
  
  >Just because you are used to one way of
  >purchasing/enjoying art, doesn't make other
  >methods 'unfair'.
  
  In the general sense, yes. But when Apple only sells music in a worse (more lossely compressed than CD or Flac), or the Louvre only sells copies of the Mona Lisa on postcards, or Pendant publishing won't even print old liturature, then it's both unfair and unethical to deprive the public of enjoying its culture.
5. Re:What if? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-07-07 11:30 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  What if I prefer to buy my music in a more lasting form?
  Tough shit.
  What if I prefer my music to be compressed with FLAC?
  Tough shit.
  What if I prefer to compress my music with MY parameters, to meet MY standards of audio fidelity?
  Tough shit.
  I don't like that this won't be available as a plain ol' CD.
  Tough shit.
6. Re:What if? by Llywelyn · 2003-07-07 13:17 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  >What if I prefer to buy my music in a more lasting form?
  
  Then purchase it from the iTMS, insert a blank CDR, and burn a copy from the playlist.
  
  --
  Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
7. Re:What if? by derch · 2003-07-07 15:07 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  I prefer that the government would give me a boat and pay me a million dollars to fish.
  
  We're both SOL.
  
  Can't you see the announcement is only for the free advertising? A month after they release the movie, Apple and Fox will quietly release the soundtrack on CD. Neither will sacrafice the chance to make extra money.
This is a test from the labels... by gozar · 2003-07-07 10:45 · Score: 5, Insightful

This is a test from the labels on how safe their music is in the iTunes store. They will know that the only way this music will make it to the various P2P apps will be from some Apple user who buys the album, burns a CD, then rips it to MP3 to distribute.

They can then use this to show that the protection in the iTunes store is not enough, and try to force Apple to change it before iTunes comes out for Windows.

All IMHO... :-)

--
What, me worry?
1. Re:This is a test from the labels... by mallie_mcg · 2003-07-07 10:50 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  This is a test from the labels on how safe their music is in the iTunes store. They will know that the only way this music will make it to the various P2P apps will be from some Apple user who buys the album, burns a CD, then rips it to MP3 to distribute.
  
  I think you forget Europe, Australasia etal, where there is no iTunes store available, the media moguls would have only given iTunes the rights to US distribution, besides, most of the sound track will probably be available today for download of the p2p networks as well as purchase from Music stores. (you would probably have to buy several albums to get it all though).
  
  --
  
  Do the following really mean anything? SCSA MCP CCSA CCNA
  --I'm not actually after an answer!
Testing the waters. by piznut · 2003-07-07 11:07 · Score: 5, Insightful

You have to figure that a soundtrack is a pretty profitable item in terms of the cost to create. There is no real new work that needs to be done other than compiling existing music into a nice package.

It is probably a fair generalization to say that soundtracks rarely sell in the same volumes as albums from pop artists. The loss of profit by reducing to such a niche market will probably be mostly offset by the higher profit margin associated with not actually having to create or mfg'r any media or packaging materials.

If they (being the publisher) lose a little money on this, it won't be much and can probably be chalked up as the cost to test this particular market.

Where am I going with this? Nowhere really...just some observations.
Apple's got something up their sleeves. by sonicsft · 2003-07-07 11:17 · Score: 4, Interesting

If you look at surrounding evidence that's popped up recently:
-Job posting for Windows iTunes developer
-Numerous bands are being scheduled to play Friday in apple stores, etc....
-This album announcement

I'd say Apple is about to release iTunes for windows. But I'm never very accurate on this guesses by it makes sense to me...

-sonic
But.. by n-baxley · 2003-07-07 11:20 · Score: 4, Funny

What if one of those 5 people who want it doesn't have a mac?

--

THIS SPACE FOR RENT
1. Re:But.. by questamor · 2003-07-07 13:14 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  They'll just have to find one of the 5 mac users that're still left, of course.
  
  (yeah, it's a troll, and I'm a mac user too :P)
Re:Yeah, smart move... by usr122122121 · 2003-07-07 13:28 · Score: 4, Informative

Interesting point. But since there's no KaZaa for the Mac...
And, btw, why the hell isn't there?
There is, it's called mlMac.

--

-braxton
Re:It's an original score...not a compilation. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-07-07 14:08 · Score: 4, Interesting

That's not true at all. The music for the film is recorded in a completely different set of recording sessions than the music for the soundtrack album. The acoustics of the studio are different, and the placement of microphones is changed to record for a two-channel mix versus a six-channel mix.

Score albums are entirely different recordings from the scores themselves.
Re:What about the Apple Records suit? by Farley+Mullet · 2003-07-07 16:45 · Score: 5, Funny

I think that offtopic was being used as a proxy for the non-existant clueless moderation.
I actually bought it... by mbbac · 2003-07-08 03:08 · Score: 4, Informative

I bought the album last night from iTunes Music Store. It's a pretty good soundtrack. If the movie is anywhere near as good as its soundtrack, it'll be exceedingly better than my expectations.

Anyway, $9.99 for 13 tracks of nicely composed orchestral work and two excellent world music songs is pretty good. I'm listening to it on my iPod as I type this.

--
mbbac