'Extraordinary' Soundtrack Will Be Apple-Exclusive
Isbiten writes "Apple has just gotten the rights to the soundtrack of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. There will be no physical CD and it will only be available from the iTunes Music Store. Cnet has the story."
This is about as exciting as having dibs on the digitally remastered soundtrack to Highlander II.
"There will be no physical CD and it will only be available from the iTunes Music Store."
Brilliant. Give non-Mac users a desire to use P2P to acquire the music.
is quite the extraordinary gentleman.
For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
What if I prefer to buy my music in a more lasting form?
What if I prefer my music to be compressed with FLAC?
What if I prefer to compress my music with MY parameters, to meet MY standards of audio fidelity?
While I am all for Apple being able to distribute this electronicly, while I can accept Apple being given sole electronic distribution rights to this music, I don't like that this won't be available as a plain ol' CD.
www.eFax.com are spammers
This is a test from the labels on how safe their music is in the iTunes store. They will know that the only way this music will make it to the various P2P apps will be from some Apple user who buys the album, burns a CD, then rips it to MP3 to distribute.
:-)
They can then use this to show that the protection in the iTunes store is not enough, and try to force Apple to change it before iTunes comes out for Windows.
All IMHO...
What, me worry?
You have to figure that a soundtrack is a pretty profitable item in terms of the cost to create. There is no real new work that needs to be done other than compiling existing music into a nice package.
It is probably a fair generalization to say that soundtracks rarely sell in the same volumes as albums from pop artists. The loss of profit by reducing to such a niche market will probably be mostly offset by the higher profit margin associated with not actually having to create or mfg'r any media or packaging materials.
If they (being the publisher) lose a little money on this, it won't be much and can probably be chalked up as the cost to test this particular market.
Where am I going with this? Nowhere really...just some observations.
My guess would be about $10 worth. The premise of online music distro is that not everyone is an audiophile, and some people just want to rock out at OK quality for a nice price.
As someone already pointed out, you can have the master tapes of you are that 133t. It just might cost you a few million bucks.
You know what?
Enough with Apple records already. I don't think they care anymore. Do they even still exist? Even if they did, they would never survive against the beast that is Apple Legal.
-You may license this sig for only $6.99.
If you look at surrounding evidence that's popped up recently:
-Job posting for Windows iTunes developer
-Numerous bands are being scheduled to play Friday in apple stores, etc....
-This album announcement
I'd say Apple is about to release iTunes for windows. But I'm never very accurate on this guesses by it makes sense to me...
-sonic
Just wait, when they debut the Windows version of iTMS, there will be another exclusive, probably much bigger than this one, to go with the launch.
They're just experimenting now -- testing the waters.
What if one of those 5 people who want it doesn't have a mac?
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
The majority of the tracks are original compositions by Trevor R. Jones performed by the London Symphony. Two tracks are more ethnic African tunes from Lady Blacksmith Mumbazo...this was all mentioned in the C|NET article.
Start up MoL on any PowerPC, dump sound to a WAV while playing the proprietary files, compress and distribute.
An easier way would be to burn it to disc and rip that disc. It won't sound as good, but figuring out the compression part of the iTunes format and overlaying that onto another format could fix such problems. Then again, we can always distribute a ~50mb WAV for each song if we're desperate enough.
As soon as someone cares enough to make the tools, high quality rips of iTunes music will be available on filesharing networks.
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
A soundtrack/score could do well this way. I may not be willing to buy an entire CD, but if I may for one or two tracks.
While the iTunes store is pretty limited, the label can find out if this is a more profitable way to handle this kind of recording. Many record companies have large libraries of tracks that are out of print - putting those tracks online could give them a new stream of revenue.
Just for that, this Joe Midwest is going to buy the damn album. See, I've already got a Mac, an iPod, an iTunes account, 'lectricity AND indoor plumbing. Let me guess, you're on a coast aren't you?
That's exactly what I meant. Now that Apple is publishing CD's itself (exclusive distribution), Apple records has a strong standing if it wants to file an injunction against Apple computers.
And for those of us where iTunes Store isn't supported.... (ie. the rest of the civilised world)
It's only a bit of music, I'm not going to lose any sleep over not being able to buy this one, but exclusive deals in any form just suck.
I tend to shy away from services that are full of "exclusive this, exclusive that" as they're just damaging my freedom of choice.
- Colin
I think that offtopic was being used as a proxy for the non-existant clueless moderation.
So, the "slashdot Community" justified their piracy on the grounds that the music Industry doesn't sell the music in the form they want it in.
So someone has done exactly that....and now you want it on CD, encoded differently, whatever.
Your getting what you asked for. Will you all now admit you just dont like paying for music regardless of format or delivery mechanism?
Gaz.
The worry I have is that since there aren't very many Macs, it's going to sell relatively few copies (compared to your average new movie soundtrack CD), and the labels are going to turn around and say "hey, we tried it, and it didn't sell!" as an argument against the iTunes model.
LordBodak's journal.
I bought the album last night from iTunes Music Store. It's a pretty good soundtrack. If the movie is anywhere near as good as its soundtrack, it'll be exceedingly better than my expectations.
Anyway, $9.99 for 13 tracks of nicely composed orchestral work and two excellent world music songs is pretty good. I'm listening to it on my iPod as I type this.
mbbac
Apple Computers was originally banned from doing anything music related by their agreement with Apple Records. They were allowed to make system beeps, but nothing more. As you can imagine, that created problems when they wanted to add a software synth to their computers in the form of QuickTime. So, before they actually published anything with MIDI capabilities, they paid Apple Records a fairly large amount of money to rescind the agreement and never sue them again. This is also why the iPod is legal, iTunes is legal, and that system sound is named sosumi (pronounced so-sue-me).
This all happened quite some time before they ever released QuickTime. It's almost as ignorant as asking a Mormon how many wives he plans to have.
While AAC is lossy it supports 5.1 Channel Sound. Lets see your CD and/or FLAC do that.
Sometimes you get what you pay for (which is why im glad i bought a mac).
---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
You can now get the CD version directly from Varèse Sarabande at their site. The "iTMS-exclusive" means it won't be sold at retail in the US, or through online resellers like Amazon, CDNow or whatever, but those unable or unwilling to use the iTMS can still get a conventional CD directly from the label. It's more expensive, of course, but if the difference is worth it to you to specifically seek this version over the other, presumably it's worth paying more as well.