Slashdot Mirror


Switch On For Powered Data Networks

ReLik writes "The BBC has an article regarding power supply via networks. 'Instead of needing adapters, computer networks could soon be supplying the devices they interconnect with both data and power. Some makers of network equipment are already putting the power via data cable system into their products. The basic plugs for computer networks are the same all over the world, raising the possibility that powered data cables could become a universal back-up power supply.'" We've talked a little about specific 802.3 spec advances previously.

42 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. 'til the first hacker comes along by 0x12d3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... he'll re-define the term "firewall"

    1. Re:'til the first hacker comes along by Endareth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really, all a hacker is likely to be able to do is disrupt the data communications on the line, they probably wouldn't even be able to detect whether the line is carring power. Think xDSL over a phone line: hackers may be able to totally disrupt the xDSL connection, but they can't stop people making calls on the phone line.

      --
      Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    2. Re:'til the first hacker comes along by trompete · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't forget that the telco backbones are fiber optic..not the best media for power transmission. They're talking about using twisted pair.
      I'm really surprised that they will try to do this, considering the voltage potential difference between buildings. I wonder if this will be limited to a small area. Even if confined to a small area, it will still be very effective. It would sure give somebody a reason to protect their network switches! I went to a college where the network switches got zapped at least once a year since they were not protected, and the building was a lightning magnet. This kind of thing used to fry a few network cards and would prove to be much more severe if power were carried over those twisted pair CAT-5 cables.

  2. ddos by Gandalfar · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just calls for ddos attacks on LAN ;-)

    There better be some good power overcharge protection included ^_^

  3. hmmmm... by tony1c · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if they'll be sending it as straight binary or xml.

    1. Re:hmmmm... by Cyno · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the data will be xml, but the power still has to be binary.

  4. new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Firewire? USB?

    1. Re:new? by RALE007 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't forget power to your keyboard or mouse via DIN and Mini-DIN (ps/2) connectors, which predates Firewire and USB.

      Power through a communications (I/O) connection is nothing new, but power on a standard so widely used has never been seen. Also, firewire, USB, and my own DIN examples have provided power only to peripherals. This new system appears to offer power to a standalone device. In essence this is a new international electrical standardization. Since it is built ontop of existing compatible ethernet standards, the US, Europe, and Asia are placed under the umbrella of one universal compatible power standard.

      You may say "it's been done" and turn your attention elsewhere (yet another example of "it's already been done" is the telephone, power has been supplied to them for decades through their communications line), but it has not been done before in this international magnitude, and the possibilities are very exciting in my opinion.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    2. Re:new? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In essence this is a new international electrical standardization. Since it is built on top of existing compatible ethernet standards, the US, Europe, and Asia are placed under the umbrella of one universal compatible power standard. ...[T]he possibilities are very exciting in my opinion.

      Don't worry; I'm sure they'll come up with a way to mess it up.

      After all, what good is a new power standard if it doesn't create a new adapter that the consumer is required to purchase? Gotta have more gougeables on the market.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. Uhm... USB already does that... by loucura! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both HIGH SPEED/POWER, AND FULL SPEED/POWER... and the as-yet-unreleased LUDICROUS SPEED/POWER.

    This is just another case of the Brits trying to steal our momentum... those bastards.

    --
    Black and grey are both shades of white.
  6. In other news the BBC by hashish · · Score: 4, Informative

    states that if you rub two sticks together you get fire.

    Seriously, how long have did it take people to release there is a current in their ethernet cable? I known of products (home made and retail) that have been around for years that utilise this power supply.

    1. Re:In other news the BBC by swtaarrs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, power over ethernet is relatively new. By saying "utilise" you make it sound like every ethernet device puts out usable power, which isn't true. I think you're thinking of phone cables, which have had power running through them for many many years, to power phones that don't have another power source.

  7. Really? by geekmetal · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The days of travelling with lots of different adapters to ensure you can recharge your laptop, phone and other gadgets could soon be at an end.

    How effective would this in a world striving to move to wireless protocols?!
    It wouldn't get the chance to make a scratch let alone a mark.

    --
    There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us
    1. Re:Really? by pv2b · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tesla coils...

      I have heard it rumored that Nikolai Tesla lit up a laboratory in New York with one of these and some fluorescent tubes. :-)

    2. Re:Really? by pv2b · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah. Pure details to engineer away. :-)

      Hey, one can dream, can't one?

    3. Re:Really? by El+Kevbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How effective would this in a world striving to move to wireless protocols?!

      Wireless is exactly where this technology is making the biggest impact. No one is thinking of charging laptops but powering wireless access points. We have to run Cat5 to our access points anyway - why not run power through that same cable?

      Kevin

  8. Power causes interference? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I admit I don't quite know the exact ins and outs of this technology, but a few things do come to mind:

    Wouldn't supplying substantial amounts of power through network cable (lets say cat5) make enough EMI to scramble the data going through the other pairs?

    Also, would this work in situations using coax cable, where there is no other pair?

    Lastly, can you put 120VAC along wires that thin without causing lots of power loss and making a lovely fire hazard?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Power causes interference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wouldn't supplying substantial amounts of power through network cable (lets say cat5) make enough EMI to scramble the data going through the other pairs?

      Not if done properly.

      Also, would this work in situations using coax cable, where there is no other pair?

      Yes.

      Lastly, can you put 120VAC along wires that thin without causing lots of power loss and making a lovely fire hazard?

      You can't, but the problem is worse. Your notebook doesn't run on 120VAC. It runs on DC power that is much lower voltage. The power supply steps down the voltage before the power gets to your system.

      The problem is that when you lower the voltage, you raise the current, and current increases heat as it gets higher. So, low voltage, high current power transmitted over CAT5 would be a big problem.

    2. Re:Power causes interference? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actualy it works VERY well for there voIP phones and a few other devices like intel AP's and mini managed switches. It' DC and nut much current enough the run a laptop and probably not enough for a full desktop replacement. Last I check it supplied 18 watts.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:Power causes interference? by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a little DC power for IP Phones and WAPs not 120VAC for your computer.

      48V at 350mA max DC.

    4. Re:Power causes interference? by wfberg · · Score: 5, Funny


      Wouldn't supplying substantial amounts of power through network cable (lets say cat5) make enough EMI to scramble the data going through the other pairs?


      Gee, I suppose those boys at the IEEE haven't paid any attention to that. How embarrassing. Those electrical engineers, always chasing the girls, playing in rock-bands, and entering in surfing contests! This kinda thing was bound to happen...

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  9. Power over ethernet? by pv2b · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yes, power over ethernet (POE) has been possible and been for quite some time, although mostly for powering up wireless base stations...


    Here is some info by POE from NYCWireless...


    Now just give me wireless repeater base stations powered by tesla coils and I'll be in heaven. :-)

  10. No more do-it-yourself IT by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yup, you'll now have to get a licensed electrician to punch down that patch panel, unless you don't mind fried IT people piling up at the bottom of your 19" rack.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  11. I hope they have some funky shielding by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Golden rule of data cable laying:
    Avoid power cables! If you've gotta go near the buggers, cross 'em at right angles.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:I hope they have some funky shielding by ldspartan · · Score: 3, Informative

      umm...
      I'm no EE, but as far as I know PoE is DC, which won't cause interference in UTP or anything else...

      --
      Phil

  12. GSM Base Stations by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These guys make a GSM/GPRS base station that is powered over Ethernet.

    Cool huh?

    --
    -- Mike
  13. What about data over power lines? by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 5, Funny

    So.. we have power over data lines and data over power lines..

    What a world, I'm so glad to be alive in 2003 :)

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  14. Electricity over IP! by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Time to pull out RFC 3251 RFC 3251!!!

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  15. Small devices only.... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Informative

    This does not look like it will be used for anything larger then small hand helds and other similary sized devices. Cat 5 is normally 24 AWG which has very high resistance per foot making long runs useless. at around 50ft you might have about 4 or 5 ohms. Unless you have 2 or 4 pair cat 5 with a pair of 18awg or larger in the same jacket it doesent have much use for anything drawing more than 10 watts or less. although making such a cable wouldent be such a bad idea.

    Would be cool to have some type of hybrid connector that carries 12V @ 10 or 20A (or maybe more volts to carry more power) with ethernet and switches can become both ethernet and power supplies. Small server farms or disk arrays etc. could be attached using just one cable for all functions.

  16. Already been done by jCaT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, so maybe this wasn't exactly what they were talking about. It's still kind of fun though...

    The Etherkiller

  17. Official ELECTRICAL ENGINEER postal flip out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    REAL Ultimate Power!!!

    EEs are sooooooooooo sweet that I want to crap my pants.

    Facts:

    1. EEs are mammals.
    2. EEs solve equations ALL the time.
    3. The purpose of the EE is to flip out and write MATLAB code.

  18. FireWire, USB by 73939133 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The RJ45 connector is a universal outlet," he said. "It's the only one identical in Asia, Europe and the US."

    The same is true for FireWire and USB, and those are far more widely available. In fact, USB is increasingly becoming the standard for recharging portable devices, with USB power cables for most PDAs and cell phones available. FireWire might be better for this than USB because it can deliver more power, but maybe the USB standard will catch up.

    You can even get a USB toothbrush.

    The RJ-45 connectors used with Ethernet really don't do it for me; I think both USB and FireWire connectors are far better designed. I think POE (Power over Ethernet) will remain a niche market.

  19. It doesn't interfere by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been quite a few posts so far about how running power over data lines is a bad idea and would cause all sorts of bad EMI, killing the data signal. But it actually doesn't. The power going through these is low-voltage DC (I think 12v), *not* high-voltage AC like wall power. AC produces changing magnetic fields which cause EMI, while DC produces a static magnetic field, so the data could care less. This is the same way that USB works (at 5v) and even POTS (plain old telephone systems...those have a full 48V DC...not always very nice when you forget that fact doing wiring). I haven't actually played with any of the equiptment myself, but from what I've read everything is low-voltage and low-power enough not to cause any sorts of problems at all.

  20. Ground loops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now this could be interesting. I worked on a system that toasted three Ethernet cards before we got a clue and stuck an isolating piece in the middle. It was on a long loop of thinnet cable which connected several buildings at a high school.

    I suspect many of the buildings had separate power feeds and therefore different grounds due to being built gradually over the course of 40 years or so. The potential eventually got us, and cost us a few bucks and a lot of lost hair.

    They had better be very careful with this stuff. Interconnecting building grounds over your network cables is a good way to fry equipment and unsuspecting people.

    1. Re:Ground loops? by azimir · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's why you run fibre between buildings. A copper->fibre 10 or 100 bridge is quite cheap these days. The fibre is also not so expensive anymore.

      Light has no ground.

  21. 802.1u by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the prelimary specs for 802.1u - power over wireless ethernet. They are planning on using microwaves to send the data and power to wireless devices around the home and office.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:802.1u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      +1 Informative? Sucker. It is obviously a joke! Even the name is part of the joke "u" = micro as in micro-wave!!! Man, only on slashdot!

    2. Re:802.1u by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Funny


      I'm testing 802.1u (power over wireless ethernet) right now. Man, is it just me or is it getting really warm in here?

  22. The Recruit by cpopin · · Score: 2

    Doesn't it seem practical that separating data from power is an essential property for data security? Ever seen The Recruit:
    http://us.imdb.com/Title?0292506

    Sounds like Ice9 to me.

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  23. Higher voltage, same wattage = lower current by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't supplying substantial amounts of power through network cable (lets say cat5) make enough EMI to scramble the data going through the other pairs?

    If it's DC only and well filtered/buffered, no. If it's RF, or DC that's not well filtered(noise is generated from any kind of switching, even in low power ICs). Buffering it isn't that tough- you can sorta think of it like a bucket under a faucet. As long as your average water needs over time don't exceed the flow out the faucet, you can take whatever you want, even large amounts suddenly, without causing pressure changes in the rest of the house. Now, imagine drawing a cup of water every once in a while from a faucet directly and shutting the water off really hard- helloooo water hammer!(similar things happen when you switch on/off power down a long line, or to/from an inductive component.)

    Also, would this work in situations using coax cable, where there is no other pair?

    Actually, Dallas Semiconductor(now part of Maxim) came up with what they call the One Wire protocol; it only needs one line for power+data(hence the name, even though you still need some sort of ground.) It's a pretty well set up system, works nicely- plenty of info on the web and their site, and there's even guides on designing a proper network- and shows the effects of cable length on things like pulse smoothing, noise, etc caused by communications and device power draw. It's VERY thorough.

    Lastly, can you put 120VAC along wires that thin without causing lots of power loss and making a lovely fire hazard?

    Actually, power loss is less with higher voltages- that's why high tension wires are tens of thousands of volts. P = I * V; 100W at 120V is .83 amps, but at 12v, it's 8.3A.

    This is important, because the higher the current, the higher the voltage drop; V = I * R. All wire(except superconducting) has some resistance, and the lower the current, the lower the voltage drop end-to-end, and the lower the amount of power(heat) the wire absorbs. Wire(or perhaps more accurately, cable) is rated in terms of maximum voltage mostly from the insulation type(its dielectric strength) and current- its gauge, or thickness of the solid or stranded bundle(larger #'s = smaller thickness).

    This is one reason automotive manufacturers want to go to 48V systems; the wiring between the battery and main bus/alternator can be much thinner, for example. Take a look at your battery cables some time- they're VERY heavy gauge. Also, as previously mentioned, stuff like dirt on contacts and corrosion between clamps+terminals or in splices are much less bothersome at lower currents.

  24. Ground loops and differences by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the reasons ethernet is AC coupled (transformers etc) is to break direct current paths. It scares me somewhat that people are thinking of reintroducing these by power down the wire.

    To achieve reasonable distances and power, the voltage will need to be highish.

    This reminds me of an incident that happened about 15 years ago. We had an ethernet cable between two buildings. The cable was terminated on computer chassis on each end. Unfortunately the two buildings were powered from different phases, so when I opened a connector I became part of the ground loop passing mains. This was not in USA, but was in a country with real (>200V) power.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  25. It's a bird! It's a plane! It's Legacyman! by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Umm, hello...

    Can anyone please tell me what the point of putting real juice down Ethernet would be? Isn't Ethernet like 30 years old? Why don't we come up with a new FireWire/USB type plug with a configurable interface, set it up with +5V, +12V, Ground, Data Send and Data Check, set up generic, open hardware-level frames capable of wrapping all other protocols and a spankin' new cable/plug combo which would shield the voltage lines? I mean, Christ, let's move on. Why are people still talking about Ethernet? Oh, and a better endplug would be nice; one that releases with a sharp jerk, stays put with a slow tug and has a satisfying, soft "click" when engaged.

    I realize I will get downmodded for this, but I am being quite serious.