Slashdot Mirror


Those Amazing Antigravity Machines?

surfimp writes "Wired is running an interesting article about 'lifters', hovering UFO-looking vehicles that have no moving parts, no onboard power supply, and are capable of levitating simply through the application of high amounts of electrical current. Enthusiasts claim their vehicles are examples of a nascent antigravity technology, while more traditional scientists - including some funded by NASA - view them as nothing more than contraptions harnessing ionic winds."

59 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. Not Antigravity by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 5, Informative

    After reading the whole long thing do you finally find out that its not antigravity at all, but an ion engine. It requires an atmosphere to work and is fully directional. Cool stuff, but not antigravity.

    1. Re:Not Antigravity by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Levitation lives!

      And yes, this one does work in a vacuum.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Not Antigravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, did you read the end of the article? Where NASA does an experiment in a true vacuum and it doesn't move?

    3. Re:Not Antigravity by elmegil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm curious where the lift comes from then in the cases where they've blocked the upper wires with straws, or placed a piece of cardboard between one of the upper wires and the lower section. I'm not saying this is antigravity, but it would seem strange that it could be ion wind with no wind.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Not Antigravity by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While these devices are only ion engines, I still think that it may be an interesting step towards discovering a true anti-gravity device. But I can't believe that electromagnatism and gravity can be unified at only a few kV of electricity. If that were the case, anti-gravity would have been discovered years ago. Besides, all voltage is is the difference in the number of electrons between two points. Perhaps at high enough voltages the gravitational attraction of the electrons at one point would cause some kind of anti-gravity effect at the opposite point, but I would assume that it would need to be a HUGE potential difference coupled with an extremely small device. Perhaps it isn't voltage at all that we need to look at to unify electromagnetism and gravity. If, that is, they can be unified at all.

      --
      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    5. Re:Not Antigravity by pauljlucas · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ... it may be an interesting step towards discovering a true anti-gravity device ...
      If you view gravity as nothing more than the curvature of space-time (as opposed to a "force") caused by the presence of mass, then there's no way to obtain an "inverse curvature" at a given point in space. Hence, there can be no anti-gravity.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    6. Re:Not Antigravity by stuffman64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article mentioned the website American Antigravity as a source of information about this "electrogravitics" phenomenon. I clicked on the section about theHutchison Effect. It is said to be "...a very complex scalar-wave interaction between electromagnetic fields and matter." To me, it just proves that people without a solid background in science will believe almost anything they see.

      Take, for example, the pictures in the document. This picture shows what looks like a butter knife embedded in some sort of metal. The metal looks pretty much like tin, lead, zinc, or some other metal with a low melting point. Maybe his scalar waves did this, or some idiot dropped a butter knife in a solder pot, let it cool, and cut it in half to reveal the knife. Who knows.

      The best part comes from the videos at the bottom of the screen. Here, you see this little toy saucer take off and "magically" fly around the room. Video 3 shows the saucer resting on a wooden plank, with the camera close by aiming right at the little magic toy. Soon enough, it takes off and flutters about. Funny how all this energy in such a little space has no ill effects on the camera and its metal bits just inches away. The next 3 videos look remarkably alike, this time showing the craft at a distance. Notice how it lifts and flys, and something on the right hand side of the screen jingles around with similar movements. Again, there are metalic objects within very close distances (like the chains hanging nearby), but the "scalar waves of magic" (my quote) do not affect it. I bet that thing on the right is a fishing rod or a hollow tube with string in it used to manipulate the craft for the camera.

      Alas, we will never know the truth, because unfortunatly, "...Hutchison's experiments have been exceeding difficult to replicate due to the extraordinarily complex arrangement of waveforms that is seemlingly required to generate the Hutchison effect."

      Folks, take most of this stuff with a grain of salt. Sure, flyers fly (I've built one using a busted monitor as a power supply - it work, but according to my calculations, takes about 8000 Joules of energy for a 30 second flight, about the same energy as a family sedan going 7mph, which is quite inefficient), but they just work on well-known principals. Next time you see an "Ionic Breeze" air purifyer, put your hand next to it - you will feel the ion-induced wind blow against your hand. Same thing going on with the lifters, just with a bit more power and a different shape.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    7. Re:Not Antigravity by lokedhs · · Score: 3, Informative

      IAMAS, but isn't it spewing ionised _air_? In a vacuum there isn't anything to ionise.

    8. Re:Not Antigravity by osgeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm mostly in agreement, but then again, if the best we can do to conceptualize the force of gravity is a depression/curvature in space-time, maybe there's a way to create a bubbling out of space-time... kind of like a hernia in the fabric of space-time.

    9. Re:Not Antigravity by ShavenYak · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...kind of like a hernia in the fabric of space-time.

      What happens when space-time collapses on the floor moaning in agony? That's not going to be a pretty sight.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    10. Re:Not Antigravity by DarkRabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      In fact, had they have done the engine in java, you would have anti-gravity...

      And if you did the engine in strong tea you would have an infinite improbability engine, right?

    11. Re:Not Antigravity by t0ast3r_b0y · · Score: 3, Informative

      Besides, all voltage is is the difference in the number of electrons between two points.

      IANALBIAAEE (I Am Not A Lawyer, But I Am An Electrical Engineer).

      That isn't true; voltage and electron density are unrelated.

      It's actually pretty easy to prove to yourself. Consider the following facts (anal physics people, cut me some slack so I can expedite things):

      1. The most telling fact: the terminals of a 12V car battery are electrostatically neutral. Try dropping some lint over one to verify this.
      2. Take a very long U-turn of wire, put a very sensitive and very fast oscilliscope voltmeter in the middle and across the two sides, and suddenly touch the two ends to a 12V battery. If density differences were driving electrons down the wire, the voltmeter would read zero, then smoothly run up to 6V (since it's in the middle); the curve would probably look a lot like a fermi distribution function. This would, of course, only take a few microseconds. However, this isn't what happens. In reality, the voltmeter will sit at zero for a time T, then suddenly (but smoothly) jump up to 12V as the voltage wavefront passes, then will sit at 12V for another T, and jump down (as the reflected wavefront passes), then sit for another T and jump up, and so on while asymptotically approaching 6V. There is absolutely no way you can explain this with diffusion gradients. And yet the reflections obviously happen, because the reason you have to put 50ohm coaxial cable into the 50ohm antenna plug on your TV (matched line and load) is to prevent them!
      3. PN semiconductor junctions (AKA diodes) work because diffusion forces resulting from differences in electron concentration are opposed by a voltage difference that developes across the junction. They can't be the same thing if they oppose one another.
      4. If you have a very large loop of low-impedance wire (to minimize confounding influences), with a battery and a multi-megaohm resistor opposite one another in the circuit, nearly all the voltage drop will be across the resistor. If voltage were a difference in electron density, two two ends of the resistor would have different electrostatic charges, and you could detect this with a piece of electrostaticaly charged string held over the resistor. Even with the resistor dissipating millions of watts (implying a huge difference in electron density between the two sides), the string would hang straight down.
  2. Amazing by drewbradford · · Score: 5, Funny

    Flying without moving parts! Why couldn't someone come up with this sooner?

    blimps... hot air balloons...

  3. heh by miseryinmotion · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the media's interpretation already:

    So, to lose weight, apply massive amounts of electrical current

    1. Re:heh by prockcore · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's proven to work! Look at all the people who went to the electric chair! Skinny as a skeleton!

    2. Re:heh by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
      " I can see the media's interpretation already: So, to lose weight, apply massive amounts of electrical current"

      Darwin's Legacy lives on.......

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:heh by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Funny

      I expect to start getting Spam tomorrow:

      LOSE 200 POUNDS INSTANTLY grskyml

  4. Further reading by Sir_Dill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    check out americanantigravity.com

    This is a site run by this guy I used to work with...pretty interesting stuff.

    I think it messed with his head a little though.

    1. Re:Further reading by nomel · · Score: 4, Funny
      The flame is drawn towards the 30-gauge collector wire when power is applied partially through an aerodynamic push from ions travelling from the emitter to the collector, but also because the flame is a mixture of combustion-gasses and gas-plasma that picks up and carries charges in the air-gap to the collector.


      One time, with a small 4kv power supply (hurt, but not too much), I tried something like this. I put a wire near the flame, near the base, and charged myself with the other. I then put my finger next to the flame as to give the illusion that I was controlling the flame. Well, it worked too good, and the flame shot at my finger, bending directly onto it. I not only got burnt almost instantly, but got shocked a little as well! Heheh. Stupid me.
    2. Re:Further reading by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, it worked too good, and the flame shot at my finger, bending directly onto it. I not only got burnt almost instantly, but got shocked a little as well!

      Trying to win a Darwin Award in multiple simultaneous categories?

  5. Obligatory boobie joke by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those Amazing Antigravity Machines

    Joke completed.

  6. More traditional scientists? by Muerte23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean the ones that deal with facts, and actual forces of nature?

    If you read to the end of the wired article, he talks about a controlled nasa experiment that showed that the effect doesn't work in vacuum.

    Also, it's not high amounts of electrical current as stated in the headline, it's high voltage. A high voltage (~20kV) wire on top ionizes air molecules which are accelerated downward toward an oppositely charged wire. Action, reaction, upward force.

    No anti gravity here. But maybe enough voltage to kill yourself. Maybe soon we will get a darwin award for an anti gravity attempt that never actually leaves the ground...

    Muerte

    1. Re:More traditional scientists? by probbka · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the current (amps) that kill, not volts...

      At least that's what my freshman physics teacher always said.

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    2. Re:More traditional scientists? by Animaether · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't recall the exact number either (I know it's in a school book around here), but I do recall my teacher asking us once :
      "Do you know how we know (N)mA kills ?"

      Conjectures of theoretical resistance in a human body through the various organs etc. were supplied, but all dismissed for the supposed true answer :
      "The best way to find out is by experimentation. Mr. Mengele did just that. And now we know."

      That was followed by the rest of the hour discussing the ethics of using this data knowing that it was obtained through such means, and whether the apparent blind acceptance by us to use these data would encourage other scientists (if one can call Mengelere that) to perform similar atrocities in future quests for knowledge.

    3. Re:More traditional scientists? by Neurotensor · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's the current (amps) that kill, not volts...

      At 20kV it doesn't take much capacitance to give you a boot - a brief current pulse as you discharge the capacitance. And if the power supply is still switched on, then your flesh tends to burn where the hot spark touches you. Volts seldom occur without Amps so don't go around thinking you're not going to die when you touch a 20kV source ;) If you're lucky you'll just be really sore afterwards. Ever touched the EHT lead of a switched-off TV?

      At least that's what my freshman physics teacher always said.

      Well then by all means touch the TV lead with a fast ammeter (CRO and resistor) and you will find out he was right, it's the Amps that will kill you ;) Or take my word for it and don't touch 20kV.

  7. NASA Patent by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Last summer, NASA was granted a patent on lifter technology

    Does this mean all US citizens can now use it? Since NASA develops its things with public money I seem to recall that they become available to everyone.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:NASA Patent by Bagheera · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ionic thust that "Lifters" use to fly is little different from the ion Xenon Ion propulsion system NASA flew on the Deep Space 1 spacecraft. Details are very different, but the concept is the same.

      1:Create Ions
      2:Accelarate them with across a voltage differential
      3:Get Thrust

      And the obligatory . . .

      4: profit!

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  8. old concept by stonebeat.org · · Score: 3, Insightful

    nothing new. this is not anti-gravity. the concept of propelling by ionic wind has been around for a while.

  9. Some guy who did an experiment with one by pv2b · · Score: 5, Informative

    A guide to building your own "lifter", sort of

    Perhaps you should build your own? Antigravity?Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. A cool toy? You bet.

  10. Cold Fusion by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
    "This is bigger than cold fusion!" one businessman told me jokingly.

    Everything is bigger than cold fusion.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  11. Anti-gravity devices by pv2b · · Score: 5, Funny

    The concept of "defying gravity" by generating an upward force larger than the force of gravity pulling the object down is indeed very exciting.

    May I interest you in a Boeing 747?

  12. C'mon by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    a grassroots movement of antigravity fans

    Damn, man, just say geeks.

  13. The *short* story by 3ryon · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can levitate almost a pound using an ion wind created by 120,000 volts. Strikes me that you could send a pound half-way around the earth using 120,000 volts and a rail gun.

    Anyone else think Wired authors get paid by the word, with no maximum?

    Sorry for the lame reply, I was trying to think of something witty just so I'd get modded up and the right person would read my sig. :)

  14. tricky by lingqi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing with testing lifters and their operation is this problem, if i understand right:

    the easiest way to verify if the lifter lifts via ionic wind is by using the lifter in a vaccum, but while the lifters work ok in normal atmospheric pressures, when you begin to decrease the pressure of where the lifter operate (putting the contraption in a pumped area, say) would eventually cause too much corona discharge to happen and do a lot of bad things (lower dielectric constant for vaccum compared to air?).

    so, in any case - ion wind or not, this technology is still not quite suitable for space just yet. (i mean, besides the fact that you need a relatively heavy powersupply for this to get going)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  15. anyone worked out the amount of power/lb? by shoestring · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone look at the power/pound?
    Let's see.. 27000 V, 20 microamp, for 3 millipound.. think that works out to something like .54 Watt. .54 W/ .003 lb = 180 W/lb..
    Anyone know how this compares to say
    "normal" engines?
    Seems to be a really good battery, unless you have a tether (or beamed power).

  16. amps kill, volts are fun by GunFodder · · Score: 4, Informative

    My physics teacher in high school had a high voltage generator called "sparky". He could crank out 100,000 volts with that thing. Then he passed electrodes around and allowed us to experience 100,000 volts firsthand :) The reason this didn't kill anyone is that volts are not necessarily dangerous; amps do. The amount of current flowing through your body determines whether electricity is harmful.

    Case in point: in the US power mains run at 120 volts. Yet this is enough to kill you. The reason is that there are tens of amps available at the wall.

    1. Re:amps kill, volts are fun by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Informative

      10 volts is enough to kill you if applied directly to your heart. its all about resistance. your hands and feet provide a longer path and thus more resistance. more resistance means more volts are needed to get the same current. if you put on rubber gloves, then a LOT more volts will be needed since thats MUCH higher resistance. But of course lightning laughs at your puny rubbers.

    2. Re:amps kill, volts are fun by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Funny
      But of course lightning laughs at your puny rubbers.

      That's why I use Trojan (TM) brand rubbers to protect myself in all those "sticky" situations, especially the ones that cause me to exert large amounts of energy.
    3. Re:amps kill, volts are fun by tzanger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually it's more about AC vs DC than it is about voltage potential. I very seriously doubt any human would survive a hundred thousand volts DC at practically any current. AC gives you this wonderful thing called skin effect which means that the vast majority of the voltage is flowing through the dead skin covering your body.

      It's true that "Volts Jolt, but mils (Amps) kill," but there's more to it than that.

  17. Why these, why now? by jfabermit · · Score: 5, Informative

    A good article, but there is a very good reason why most physicists tend to be extremely skeptical about claims like this. The voltages used by lifters may be large, but don't push the limits of modern technology in any way, shape or form. If strange anti-gravity phenomena happened for 10's of kV, we'd have seen the phenomena in a number of different places. Physical laws, as best we can tell, are universal, and they have many, MANY situations where they apply. It is extremely unlikely that these contraptions encounter high voltage antigrav phenomena, and no other high voltage machine we know of does. BTW, I know Rai Weiss, and he is certainly kinetic, but hyperkinetic might be a bit of a stretch. Definitely a world-class physicist, too, one whose calculations you should generally take seriously.

  18. Re:Outrage!... by hpa · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know... the thing that's really annoying is that the article, after noting the bogosity of the "new physics" claims, pretty much implies that "it can't work, but it does."

    There is no new physics here, but perhaps new technology. All propulsion technology is really rehashes of the same old laws of physics, but that doesn't mean we have even begun to scrape the surface of what can be done with it. Ion-wind "lifters" (working in atmosphere) could very well become useful, especially in conjunction with ion rockets (which work in space.)

  19. airplanes and other uses by 73939133 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    while more traditional scientists - including some funded by NASA - view them as nothing more than contraptions harnessing ionic winds.

    Yes, and airplanes are nothing more than contraptions harnessing aerodynamic lift, and the people who designed them originally also didn't fully understand the physics involved. If "ionic wind engines" can be made practical and acceptably efficient, they might give rise to a new class of airborn vehicles.

    And perhaps there are other uses as well. For example, electric fields and magnetic currents might be useful for shaping and redirecting the hot air that occurs during reentry from space. Or, the same technology might find uses not for pushing around large amounts of air for propulsion, but instead for changing the properties of the thin layer of air right above the surface of a traditional plane or vehicle--this could perhaps be used to reduce turbulences and improve performance.

  20. Irresponsible Post by nametaken · · Score: 5, Funny


    Why would you post this? You know how many /.'ers are going to electrocute themselves in the next couple days?? (likely, myself included)

  21. Complete bogus by fpp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    James Randi, the famous skeptic, has this to say about this subject (http://www.randi.org/jr/060702.html):

    "Go take a look at http://www.americanantigravity.com/index.html and see very interesting videos of what the supporters seem to believe is a breakthrough in science. If this device is "antigravity," then a pogo stick and a crow are both antigravity items, as well.

    I saw a similar demo at the University of Toronto back in 1946. That demo used a flat circular coil of wire; I believe this is the same thing, but a triangular form leads one away from the "induction" conclusion. It's a matter of high-voltage electrical fields generated by something that you don't see in the videos; there's always a source of high voltage present, a CRT (computer monitor or TV receiver) or a HV power supply, just out of camera view. What's also not obvious here is that the triangular frame -- which weighs only a few grams -- is tethered down by very fine invisible threads, a fact which when known, makes the apparent "maneuvering" appearance less mysterious by far."

  22. These things are so cool! by be-fan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When my friend first showed me the site, I thought it was a hoax. He bitched about it enough that we decided to build some at school. We opened up some monitors to use as 25,000 volt power supplies, and wired one up using very thin wire and balsa wood. The damn thing flew alright. Power-to-weight ratio sucked, though. The thing was hooked up to a monitor (don't know much it was actually dissipating) but could only lift about its body weight (2 or 3 grams for our model). The nifty thing about it is that while we were working on it, we left it in the robotics lab labeled "Anti-gravity machine, do not touch!"

    PS> If you try this at home, remember, high voltages arc very easily! One of the times we tried it, there was a class in the lab at the time. One guy was so fascinated that the electric charge in the wires made the hair on his arm stand on end that he got a little too close :)

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  23. Re:Vacuum operation by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The real missing experiment is the one where we see what happens when you bother to read the article first.

    Once equipped with the fantastic knowledge that they did, in fact, perform that experiment, I anticipate great things from you! Your blinding grasp of the obvious and your brave decision to criticize something you didn't read suggest that there are many exciting truths just waiting to pounce from your mouth!

  24. harnessing ionic winds by djupedal · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...or, as it is known in most border towns in Texas...."fffrrrriiipppp!!! Damn, Roy...that was SOME good chili!!

  25. Spacecraft power suppy problem solved! by zerofoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey it's in the article:
    no onboard fuel

    And it's in the slashdot blurb:
    no onboard power supply

    What they don't say is that this sucker is electrical.....so to make this thing fly 2.6 million light years, you need 2.6 million light years of extension cord.

    Oh yeah, you need atmosphere too.

    Nifty, but useless.

    -ted

  26. This was in Popular Science years ago by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember reading about this technology in Popular Science oh - back in the late 60's or 70's? It was clearly pitched as Ionic at the time - and the problem at the time seemed to have been how to carry the power supply around.

  27. Breakthrough is near! by slobber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you seen those awesome hovercrafts in Matrix? Recall all the lightning around them? These must be it: "Nebukadnezar - powered by ionic wind!"

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
  28. Re:missing link on gravity by Jerf · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's probably a reference to the Grand Unified Field Theory, the Holy Grail of particle physics where all forces are reduced to various aspects of one force.

    Once upon a time, electricity and magnetism were thought to be different forces. Now we know they are two aspects of the same thing. Later it was found at high energy states the nuclear weak force and electromagentism were also two aspects of the same "electroweak" force. I'm not a physicist but IIRC they've also shown how the nuclear strong force (holds atoms together) is the same.

    The force that refuses to be unified is gravity. It still remains a seperate term in all theories. It is hoped that by pushing particle accelerators to higher and higher energy states, enough clues will be given to piece together the relationships once and for all.

    However, the link will not be found at room temperature and mere thousands of volts; we're talking millions of degrees, you know, the kinds of temperatures where us mere mortals stop caring which scale it's being measured in, and densities that would make a neutron star green with envy. Basically, barring Extraordinary Evidence, the line that so intrigued you is indicative of the ignorance of the writer, not an interesting phenomenon.

    However, if you find this interesting I would encourage you to go ahead and learn about real particle physics; it boggles my mind why people enjoy various tin-hat conspiracy-type theories about physics when the real thing is so much richer and more fascinating then any man-made fiction could ever be. Like I said, I'm not a physicist but I enjoy laymen-level particle physics and cosmology and would love to learn more about it sometime in a context where nobody was forcing me to turn in homework ;-)

    By the way, on the topic of the GUT, go here and grab this sound file... it won't be much more informative overall then this post but it will be much more fun.

  29. I built one a while back. by nomel · · Score: 4, Informative

    I made one of these things a while ago.

    website here

    My website has picture too! Even of my high tech power supply apparatus! And my super HV safety encolsure!

    Even got some video (which unfortunatly isn't on my website yet, can't find the tape) of it's final crash. You can definitely feel the ionic wind underneath the thing. It was a lot of fun making it though. Only burned a couple hole in the carpet (the cement under the carpet is plenty conductive), a floormat (I repeat, the cement is conductive), and some paper (got in the way of the cement), and lots of grass from when I used it outside (ground is conductive too, duh). At least my lifter went out in a flaming ball of glory, when it proceded to fly into a metallic doorframe, causing huge arcs and fire (which happens to be what I got on video:) after I cut one of the teathers (Muahhaha!).

    Some think it is forces cause by the electrical field lines going from plates that are perpendicular. This is interesting, but i don't think this is how it works. If you look at the design, there is no stable capacitor. Since you do not ground the foil, you are not making a plate that will stay at a substantial potential that is less than the wire, because of ionized air and sparks that tend to sometime fly to it. And, the capacitance would be sooo low, that 25kv most likely wouldn't be enough to lift it even if those forces did exist. Also, looking at the construction, I can't see and perpendicular plates.

    I also saw an experiment, cant find it though, of someone who put one in a bag that was wrapped around it. It didn't fly...which proves it. And, someone told me that if you monitor the current (didn't have or make a HV current meter at the time) there is a HUGD power draw that would be plenty to lift the lifter.

  30. I hate to /. this guy's site but... by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you want to build a really neat motor using exactly the same principles as these "anti-gravity" machines, check out this link.

    http://www.amasci.com/emotor/emot1.html

    You can use a TV screen as your high voltage source.

    I had a variation of this spinning on my office PC a few years back.

    Nothing says geek quite like a monitor powered ion motor on your desk.

  31. Don't listen to the troll, kids! by wass · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The 120v from a US wall socket is not enough to kill you.

    No!
    Well, if you want to Darwin yourself, go ahead, but this is for the benefit of other /.ers that might actually believe you.

    120 VAC conducted through relatively dry skin and with no other bodily paths to ground for a short enough time might not be so bad. Even at 240 VAC too.

    Now if you've just come out of the shower, and your feet are touching a nice wet grounded contact, or say one of your hands is touching the bathtub spigot, while you touch the hot lead of 120 VAC, say bye-bye. Actually, you won't be able to say it, your muscles will just quiver at 60 Hz (really at 120 Hz [I think] because you'll get two quivers for each cycle) until your heart fibrillates.

    If that still sounds relatively tame, you can take two thumbtacks, press them deep into your thumbs, and connect them across the 120 VAC. You might get a nice scent of roasting meat for a few seconds too. To bad you'll be cooking and electrocuting yourself and unable to autocanabalise yourself instead.

    I do not know the current, but I do know it won't kill you,

    Ohm's Law. Well, sort of. The resistance of the human body is non-linear, and also non-homogeneous. As you lower the resistance through any means, you'll have more current flow. If that current flows through your heart, it can be more likely to give your heart fibrillations. Translation - 120 VAC can kill you.

    --

    make world, not war

  32. several small problems by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If you look at it carefully, you will notice that
    • these things are basically aluminum foil and balsa wood. and some wires with some pretty high voltage.
    • they are tethered down with fishing line so that the don't go shattering themselves, crashinfg high voltage lines into the operators. Otherwise there would be no control whatsoever.
    • The fishing line is usually not visible
    • the actual power supplies are kept out of sight, and are good old fashioned heavy as S*** high voltage generators with a plug to the wall. think a ten or twenty pound unit punching HV into a 2 or 3 oz "lifter"
    Until they can overcome this need to have an external power unit that outweighs the "lifter" by a factor of at least a couple of hundred to one, this will not be a practical technology. Never mind the need for invisible tether strings for navigational control.

    Lets face it, you throw enough voltage into something, and you can make almost anything flip.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:several small problems by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The lack of control thing is really just because nobody bothers to try. It's like building a helicopter rotor and engine and just turning it on. It'll flip all the fuck over unless you tie it down or something. I'm guessing if you put little stablizer lifters on the sides of your big lifter you get lighting going in between them or other bad things, but if you did something like that, I can't see this being any more unstable than any other kind of propulsion.

      BTW, if the Nebechunezzar runs on lifters, why does it need an EMP? Anything more conductive than a petrified Carrie-Anne Moss ought to be attracting ridiculous arcs by the time it gets within tense music distance, no?

  33. NASA: get out of the Dark Ages! by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Last fall, they tested the contraption in regular air - shooting it with 27,000 volts at 20 microamps. Bingo: It generated 3 millipounds of force [...] "We're talking maybe even a pound of thrust out of one of these little devices the size of my thumb. We've got some promise here!"'

    Millipounds? Pounds? What's that in bushels per hectare?

    My god, no wonder they keep smashing things into Mars if their cutting edge research is done in pounds and by "rule of thumb".

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  34. Re:Lifter theory, efficiency equations by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pfft, Barsoukov's stuff is sophmotic. Note, for instance, that he doesn't consider entrainment of the surrounding medium as a working mass in his "what it's not" section.

    ion wind + air pulled along with it = lots of airflow

    Don't believe me? Check out back issues of PopMech from the late 1960's, they build a fan with no moving parts out of lifter parts.

  35. The big problem with real anti-gravity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    is that it stops you being stuck to the Earth's surface. Since the Earth is: a) rotating (at 1038mph at the equator) b) orbiting the sun (at 67,000mph) c) in a solar system orbiting the galaxy (at 558,000mph) that is itself in a galaxy drifing in our local group (at 669,600mph) anyone who stops being affected by gravity, even for a split second, would end up pretty far away. I believe it's called 'absolute rest'.