Slashdot Mirror


Those Amazing Antigravity Machines?

surfimp writes "Wired is running an interesting article about 'lifters', hovering UFO-looking vehicles that have no moving parts, no onboard power supply, and are capable of levitating simply through the application of high amounts of electrical current. Enthusiasts claim their vehicles are examples of a nascent antigravity technology, while more traditional scientists - including some funded by NASA - view them as nothing more than contraptions harnessing ionic winds."

22 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. Not Antigravity by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 5, Informative

    After reading the whole long thing do you finally find out that its not antigravity at all, but an ion engine. It requires an atmosphere to work and is fully directional. Cool stuff, but not antigravity.

    1. Re:Not Antigravity by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Levitation lives!

      And yes, this one does work in a vacuum.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Not Antigravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, did you read the end of the article? Where NASA does an experiment in a true vacuum and it doesn't move?

    3. Re:Not Antigravity by stuffman64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article mentioned the website American Antigravity as a source of information about this "electrogravitics" phenomenon. I clicked on the section about theHutchison Effect. It is said to be "...a very complex scalar-wave interaction between electromagnetic fields and matter." To me, it just proves that people without a solid background in science will believe almost anything they see.

      Take, for example, the pictures in the document. This picture shows what looks like a butter knife embedded in some sort of metal. The metal looks pretty much like tin, lead, zinc, or some other metal with a low melting point. Maybe his scalar waves did this, or some idiot dropped a butter knife in a solder pot, let it cool, and cut it in half to reveal the knife. Who knows.

      The best part comes from the videos at the bottom of the screen. Here, you see this little toy saucer take off and "magically" fly around the room. Video 3 shows the saucer resting on a wooden plank, with the camera close by aiming right at the little magic toy. Soon enough, it takes off and flutters about. Funny how all this energy in such a little space has no ill effects on the camera and its metal bits just inches away. The next 3 videos look remarkably alike, this time showing the craft at a distance. Notice how it lifts and flys, and something on the right hand side of the screen jingles around with similar movements. Again, there are metalic objects within very close distances (like the chains hanging nearby), but the "scalar waves of magic" (my quote) do not affect it. I bet that thing on the right is a fishing rod or a hollow tube with string in it used to manipulate the craft for the camera.

      Alas, we will never know the truth, because unfortunatly, "...Hutchison's experiments have been exceeding difficult to replicate due to the extraordinarily complex arrangement of waveforms that is seemlingly required to generate the Hutchison effect."

      Folks, take most of this stuff with a grain of salt. Sure, flyers fly (I've built one using a busted monitor as a power supply - it work, but according to my calculations, takes about 8000 Joules of energy for a 30 second flight, about the same energy as a family sedan going 7mph, which is quite inefficient), but they just work on well-known principals. Next time you see an "Ionic Breeze" air purifyer, put your hand next to it - you will feel the ion-induced wind blow against your hand. Same thing going on with the lifters, just with a bit more power and a different shape.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    4. Re:Not Antigravity by DarkRabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      In fact, had they have done the engine in java, you would have anti-gravity...

      And if you did the engine in strong tea you would have an infinite improbability engine, right?

  2. Amazing by drewbradford · · Score: 5, Funny

    Flying without moving parts! Why couldn't someone come up with this sooner?

    blimps... hot air balloons...

  3. heh by miseryinmotion · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the media's interpretation already:

    So, to lose weight, apply massive amounts of electrical current

  4. Further reading by Sir_Dill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    check out americanantigravity.com

    This is a site run by this guy I used to work with...pretty interesting stuff.

    I think it messed with his head a little though.

    1. Re:Further reading by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, it worked too good, and the flame shot at my finger, bending directly onto it. I not only got burnt almost instantly, but got shocked a little as well!

      Trying to win a Darwin Award in multiple simultaneous categories?

  5. More traditional scientists? by Muerte23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean the ones that deal with facts, and actual forces of nature?

    If you read to the end of the wired article, he talks about a controlled nasa experiment that showed that the effect doesn't work in vacuum.

    Also, it's not high amounts of electrical current as stated in the headline, it's high voltage. A high voltage (~20kV) wire on top ionizes air molecules which are accelerated downward toward an oppositely charged wire. Action, reaction, upward force.

    No anti gravity here. But maybe enough voltage to kill yourself. Maybe soon we will get a darwin award for an anti gravity attempt that never actually leaves the ground...

    Muerte

    1. Re:More traditional scientists? by probbka · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the current (amps) that kill, not volts...

      At least that's what my freshman physics teacher always said.

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
  6. Some guy who did an experiment with one by pv2b · · Score: 5, Informative

    A guide to building your own "lifter", sort of

    Perhaps you should build your own? Antigravity?Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. A cool toy? You bet.

  7. Anti-gravity devices by pv2b · · Score: 5, Funny

    The concept of "defying gravity" by generating an upward force larger than the force of gravity pulling the object down is indeed very exciting.

    May I interest you in a Boeing 747?

  8. C'mon by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    a grassroots movement of antigravity fans

    Damn, man, just say geeks.

  9. The *short* story by 3ryon · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can levitate almost a pound using an ion wind created by 120,000 volts. Strikes me that you could send a pound half-way around the earth using 120,000 volts and a rail gun.

    Anyone else think Wired authors get paid by the word, with no maximum?

    Sorry for the lame reply, I was trying to think of something witty just so I'd get modded up and the right person would read my sig. :)

  10. Why these, why now? by jfabermit · · Score: 5, Informative

    A good article, but there is a very good reason why most physicists tend to be extremely skeptical about claims like this. The voltages used by lifters may be large, but don't push the limits of modern technology in any way, shape or form. If strange anti-gravity phenomena happened for 10's of kV, we'd have seen the phenomena in a number of different places. Physical laws, as best we can tell, are universal, and they have many, MANY situations where they apply. It is extremely unlikely that these contraptions encounter high voltage antigrav phenomena, and no other high voltage machine we know of does. BTW, I know Rai Weiss, and he is certainly kinetic, but hyperkinetic might be a bit of a stretch. Definitely a world-class physicist, too, one whose calculations you should generally take seriously.

  11. Irresponsible Post by nametaken · · Score: 5, Funny


    Why would you post this? You know how many /.'ers are going to electrocute themselves in the next couple days?? (likely, myself included)

  12. Complete bogus by fpp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    James Randi, the famous skeptic, has this to say about this subject (http://www.randi.org/jr/060702.html):

    "Go take a look at http://www.americanantigravity.com/index.html and see very interesting videos of what the supporters seem to believe is a breakthrough in science. If this device is "antigravity," then a pogo stick and a crow are both antigravity items, as well.

    I saw a similar demo at the University of Toronto back in 1946. That demo used a flat circular coil of wire; I believe this is the same thing, but a triangular form leads one away from the "induction" conclusion. It's a matter of high-voltage electrical fields generated by something that you don't see in the videos; there's always a source of high voltage present, a CRT (computer monitor or TV receiver) or a HV power supply, just out of camera view. What's also not obvious here is that the triangular frame -- which weighs only a few grams -- is tethered down by very fine invisible threads, a fact which when known, makes the apparent "maneuvering" appearance less mysterious by far."

  13. This was in Popular Science years ago by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember reading about this technology in Popular Science oh - back in the late 60's or 70's? It was clearly pitched as Ionic at the time - and the problem at the time seemed to have been how to carry the power supply around.

  14. Re:amps kill, volts are fun by tzanger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually it's more about AC vs DC than it is about voltage potential. I very seriously doubt any human would survive a hundred thousand volts DC at practically any current. AC gives you this wonderful thing called skin effect which means that the vast majority of the voltage is flowing through the dead skin covering your body.

    It's true that "Volts Jolt, but mils (Amps) kill," but there's more to it than that.

  15. Don't listen to the troll, kids! by wass · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The 120v from a US wall socket is not enough to kill you.

    No!
    Well, if you want to Darwin yourself, go ahead, but this is for the benefit of other /.ers that might actually believe you.

    120 VAC conducted through relatively dry skin and with no other bodily paths to ground for a short enough time might not be so bad. Even at 240 VAC too.

    Now if you've just come out of the shower, and your feet are touching a nice wet grounded contact, or say one of your hands is touching the bathtub spigot, while you touch the hot lead of 120 VAC, say bye-bye. Actually, you won't be able to say it, your muscles will just quiver at 60 Hz (really at 120 Hz [I think] because you'll get two quivers for each cycle) until your heart fibrillates.

    If that still sounds relatively tame, you can take two thumbtacks, press them deep into your thumbs, and connect them across the 120 VAC. You might get a nice scent of roasting meat for a few seconds too. To bad you'll be cooking and electrocuting yourself and unable to autocanabalise yourself instead.

    I do not know the current, but I do know it won't kill you,

    Ohm's Law. Well, sort of. The resistance of the human body is non-linear, and also non-homogeneous. As you lower the resistance through any means, you'll have more current flow. If that current flows through your heart, it can be more likely to give your heart fibrillations. Translation - 120 VAC can kill you.

    --

    make world, not war

  16. Re:several small problems by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The lack of control thing is really just because nobody bothers to try. It's like building a helicopter rotor and engine and just turning it on. It'll flip all the fuck over unless you tie it down or something. I'm guessing if you put little stablizer lifters on the sides of your big lifter you get lighting going in between them or other bad things, but if you did something like that, I can't see this being any more unstable than any other kind of propulsion.

    BTW, if the Nebechunezzar runs on lifters, why does it need an EMP? Anything more conductive than a petrified Carrie-Anne Moss ought to be attracting ridiculous arcs by the time it gets within tense music distance, no?