Slashdot Mirror


SETI Gains Respect, NASA Funding

securitas writes "After having its funding cut off by Congress a decade ago, the SETI program has just received a NASA five-year grant (Google link) to participate as a lead team in the NASA Astrobiology Institute, which investigates the origin and future of life in the universe. For more information, see the Astrobiology Institute's announcement and the NASA press release."

39 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Meanwhile... by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Funny

    The search for intelligent life on Earth continues.

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by hdparm · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's been found.

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by Ratphace · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I think that SETI is a worthwhile endeavor, but you know, one has to wonder that if my doing the seti@home thing that eventually they will run out of units for folks to process and start pawning other NASA projects off to our PC's to crunch numbers beause undoubtedly they'll have so much stuff to do that they won't be able to get it done with the cutbacks in other areas. :) So, in order to get caught up it's a good idea to start funding SETI so they can start passing their work off to the seti@home folks.

  2. Its nice... by soliaus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...to see that the government is dishing out some money for the advancement of programs which were at one time considered to be fantasy or science fiction. Personally, I hope to see more funding in these areas.

    -----------------
    God, is that you?

    --
    Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
  3. NASA funded? by inaeldi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't know NASA had enough money to donate, with all the cutbacks and whatnot.

    1. Re:NASA funded? by psavo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I didn't know NASA had enough money to donate, with all the cutbacks and whatnot.

      Sounds more like outsourcing facilities to more competent business?

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:NASA funded? by Madcapjack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well the strange thing about funding is that it isn't necessarily like all the money that an agency has can be used how it wants to use it. NASA for example might be short of funds for space exploration but have an excess of cash to be appropriated for certain kinds of research, and no matter how NASA might wish to appropriate the fund.

  4. this is great news by PhysicsExpert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its about time that SETI got some serious funding, its mainly been kept going by enthusiastic amateurs over the last few years and at one point in the early 80s it actually looked like it was going to close.

    One thing they should be able to do with is money is investigate the interesting readings they've been getting from proxima centuri, where several M class planets have been discovered. The chances of it being life are small but the fact is that the 55Gev readings they've been getting are a complete mystery so even if the're just coming from a tachyon field it should produce some interesting new data

    --
    All that glitters has a high refractive index.
    1. Re:this is great news by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Its about time that SETI got some serious funding, its mainly been kept going by enthusiastic amateurs over the last few years and at one point in the early 80s it actually looked like it was going to close

      Hey, I'm all for the SETI thing (did over 7500 units on SETI@home myself), but I don't think using our tax dollars searching for aliens in a time when we've got the largest national debt in history makes alot of sense. Yeah, it might be cool to discover life elsewhere, but ya need to prioritize. One last point...the money that NASA spends (like most other govt. agencies) is hughly inefficient compared to that of private industry.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:this is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I still call this government hipocracy. They dropped funding and turned their backs when nothing was seen coming from the project. And not that a few hundred scientists have started finding interesting stuff (55Gev) in their spair time, the government is ready to walk in and calm the victory themselves. So typical.

      Anyway, about the 55Gev, it's really interesting, I've heard stories that whatever it is, the civilization that made those stuff (if one existed) would have now vanished. Incredbile thinking we are looking at intelligent lives that are no longer around, scary at the same time makes you feel kinda lonely and depressed.

    3. Re:this is great news by puusism · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know perfectly well that M class planets only exist in Star Trek. The same applies also to tachyon fields. :-) And no earth-like planets have ever been discovered around Proxima Centauri...

      I think you should not be modded down as troll, because this is a good indicator about the data quality found on Interesting 5 Slashdot posts.

      --
      - Ismo
    4. Re:this is great news by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, it might be cool to discover life elsewhere, but ya need to prioritize.

      Personally, I feel you're the one who needs to prioritize - putting the national debt ahead of finding intelligent life?

    5. Re:this is great news by FroMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt that the government is thinking, "Oh lets ride on SETI's coattails." More likely the government someone figured, hey, they actually seem to be getting somewhere, we can toss them a few coin and see what they come up with.

      I know, its much to easy to think bad things of the government, but try to think objectively.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  5. Re:Waste of money by sleeper0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure you say that now, but you'll be crying when china has all of the lucrative exclusive extra terrestrial trade deals worked out and we're still trying to sell cars to canada.

  6. Re:Waste of money by NicenessHimself · · Score: 5, Interesting
    SETI is important because it:
    • seeks to answer an important question: are we alone? Statistically, probably not. But finding that 'first contact' will have a world-altering impact upon technology and religion etc
    • gets punters involved in science
    • utilises information already gathered and processed for other astronomical research. It really is about making maximum use of the data gathered by the radio telescopes of the world
  7. Chance or Design? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is important to note here that the U.S. government through its agency NASA has officially thrown support to the adherents of evolution.

    If there is no evolution, then there is no chance that life would exist anywhere else in the universe because it would have had to have been Created only here. The New Testament of the Bible (in which most Creationists readily and eagerly believe) repeatedly claims that there is only one Son of God and that only through Him is salvation possible. This would mean that if by some chance that there were lifeforms elsewhere in the galaxy that they would have to be perfect beings or destined for Hell. Since a loving God wouldn't create beings guaranteed to spend eternity in the flames of Hades, it stands to reason that God would have only created Life here on Earth (where, again, He sent His Son).

    But with NASA supporting the search for ET life, the government has implicitly thumbed its nose at the Creationists.

    It's about time, if you ask me.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Chance or Design? by DarenN · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There's soooo many holes in that that I wasn't sure where to start. Incidentally IANAC (I am not a creationist)

      If there is no evolution, then there is no chance that life would exist anywhere else in the universe because it would have had to have been Created only here

      That makes no sense. The basis of most religions is that their god is omnipotent and ominescent, so why can't they have created multiple intelligent lifeforms. For that matter, the power of the god can explain evolution, too (how could such a finely balanced lattice have occured without something guiding it's creation)

      The New Testament of the Bible (in which most Creationists readily and eagerly believe) repeatedly claims that there is only one Son of God and that only through Him is salvation possible.

      He was human incarnate, not human. Why couldn't he have been "Ugly bug-eyed monster from Proxima Centauri incarnate" or "Betazed incarnate"?

      You can be absolutely certain that if intelligent life were discovered tomorrow, on Earth or anywhere else the scriptures of most of the major religions would prove flexible enough to accomodate it.


      And to bring this back on topic, it's good to see the funding, but I wonder is it because SETI is starting to get data that interests NASA for some reason (like the readings from Proxima Centauri mentioned in another post).

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    2. Re:Chance or Design? by Kinniken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He was human incarnate, not human. Why couldn't he have been "Ugly bug-eyed monster from Proxima Centauri incarnate" or "Betazed incarnate"?

      You can be absolutely certain that if intelligent life were discovered tomorrow, on Earth or anywhere else the scriptures of most of the major religions would prove flexible enough to accomodate it.


      I have no doubt that at least some churches would adapt, but it would be far more difficult than what you say. For a start, any alien life would be most likely very different from our own ; not only physically, but in terms of psychology, values, organization, beliefs... simply "transposing" the Bible to their civilization and thus making them "human equivalents" would most likely be totally impossible.
      Even supposing that they look and behave enough like human for such a transposition to be possible (or more likely, that not enough is known about them to disprove it and that the churches chooses to believe it is the case), you are still left with some big, big problems. For a start, Humanity is no longer the sole "summit of creation", as claimed by the Bible. We are no longer "created to God's image". And even with your idea of a "Christ-incarnate" in the different alien races which solves the problem of having multiple sons of God, that still means that the Crucifixion and the Resurrection were not unique - they happened a number of time in different alien worlds.
      I suppose Religions, including Christian one, would adapt, but definite proof of the existence of Alien civilizations would require massive updating of the Churches' beliefs.

      --
      What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
    3. Re:Chance or Design? by richie2000 · · Score: 5, Funny
      definite proof of the existence of Alien civilizations would require massive updating of the Churches' beliefs.

      Not really. Just some kick-ass space crusades.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    4. Re:Chance or Design? by LilMikey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm always disappointed when people quote the Bible trying to disprove science. There are 2 things to remember here...

      1. The Bible is a blueprint. Very few theological scholars believe the Bible should be taken as an account of history. What we were given wasn't a reference manual, it was a lesson book. In my view (as off-base as it may be) reading the Bible to get an account of what happend a couple thousand years ago is missing the point and somewhat cheapening the meaning of the book.

      2. God was speaking to scientifically primitive people. If he mentioned aliens on other planets how would they take it? How would they write it? They didn't even have the words in their vocabulary. God just described the book, it was up to people with no knowledge of space, biology, evolution, etc. to write it. God chose his words carefully like any good parent. He didn't tell us everything (or there would be no science) but he told us what we needed to hear.

      Any anyone who reads this and exclaims "He's calling God a liar!" is REALLY missing the point.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  8. What's so great about SETI?? by jkrise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometime back, we read NASA withdrew funding for DARPA, IIRC. What's so compelling for NASA to pump more funds into SETI? Some kind of social engineering at work here, methinks.

    It's ironic, but NASA seems to be getting more attention after a spectacular failure (Colombia disaster)

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  9. Finally.... by VladTheBad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I never understood why it was so hard to give funding to a program that could make the most important discovery yet.... (except for oil on mars... that'd be the only thing that'd get us off this rock faster...)

    At least they got the 24 hours of time to point Arecibo where they wanted before... now maybe they'll get more time, more radio telescope data to send out as workunits.

    The whole program seemed to be a great use of national money to me when I first learned about SETI, and its still a good place to invest money I think.

    Of course, I could be wrong....

  10. Just goes to show by maroberts · · Score: 5, Funny

    That putting that trojan in the screensaver that lobbies congressmen was a good idea.....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  11. Search for ET... by Dammerung · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's now nice to know all those 60-Some data sets I've gone through at about 30 hours each weren't in vain.

  12. SETI Announcement by pen · · Score: 4, Informative

    SETI Institute Selected as Astrobiology Lead Team
    The SETI Institute is proud to announce that it has been chosen as a lead team for NASA's Astrobiology Institute (NAI), the international research consortium coordinated through NAI's offices at NASA's Ames Research Center. NASA Ames is a long-standing partner of the SETI Institute in the search for life on other worlds, and we welcome this opportunity to deepen our scientific relationship.

  13. War of the Worlds by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Funny
    Preemptive War on Drugs. Taken care of.

    Preemptive War on Terrorism. Almost taken care of.

    Preemptive War on Little Green Men. That's our next Goal.

  14. What about seti@home? by Lispy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, with all the infrastructure and the servers running smoothly I personally believe this to be a very promising effort. So are they in or are they out of the funding?

    cu,
    Lispy

  15. Re:Waste of money by SifuDave54 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why don't we just stop putting money into the arts too? according to you, we can't afford such frivolous things such as curiosity and expression and searching for meaning.

  16. Re:Waste of money by DarenN · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As much as i would love to support the search for life in the galaxy sometimes its not a good idea. Although i do think that as humans we should try to search any money we put into a project like this is as good as gone and in finacial hard times like this we cant afford to throw around much.


    At the risk of starting a flamewar (I'm in an asbestos suit :P) attitudes like this piss me off enormously. All this stupid "we shouldn't put money into this, that and the other because of hard times/the poor/the children" is spurious.

    Fact: Agencies like NASA can stimulate the economy, by virtue of their sheer size. The same, but more so goes for the defense establishment

    Fact: many items which we take for granted today would not be a reality if it wasn't for the research money the governments provided

    I believe the single greatest hope for the eventual equality of all (which is somewhere in the american constitution, right?) is technology. You may or may not agree with this, you might say education, for instance, but more effiecient and cost effective ways of teaching and learning will come out of research.

    The "I don't want to pay so my descendants will benefit" attitude is an attitude that would have wiped out the human race, or any species, for that matter, if it was rife. If you are bemoaning your contribution, there is nothing stopping you disappearing into the hills and living as a hermit (except that wouldn't fit in your comfort zone, would it), while the rest of us go and make progress for the benefit of the species as a whole.

    This is also the reason that 20 new types of disposable wipe a year piss me off so badly.

    --
    Rational thought is the only true freedom
  17. All they need to do... by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is point their telescopes at Alabama. Tons of other-worldly creatures live there.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  18. First decoded alien signals from SETI: by deathcow · · Score: 4, Funny

    "PLZ resend disk 2 of TWO TOWERS"

  19. We don't really read the articles, but... by slasho81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't it time for Slashdot to partner with NYT just like Google did (link-wise)? After all, Slashdot is a rather large referrer to NYT articles.

  20. Re:Waste of money by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "seeks to answer an important question: are we alone? Statistically, probably not."

    Statistically, almost certainly. Barring accidents or idiotic governments that totally devastate the human species, we will have colonised the entire galaxy in a million years or so, and be conducting engineering projects on a massive scale that would be visible from many light years away: the odds of the only two intelligent species in the galaxy evolving within a million years of each other are probably pretty slim, so if they existed they'd be here by now.

    I run seti@home just on the offchance that we're lucky and there is someone else around, but statistically, if there really are aliens out there, they should be as difficult to find as a million-strong herd of penguins running around Manhattan shouting 'Phear The Penguin Horde!'.

  21. Excellent use of NASA funds... by Jerry · · Score: 3, Informative
    because SETI gets more bang for the buck!


    Their hypothesis is also a good test of the theory that IL abounds in the universe. But so far, in the narrow range (+-10deg) that the Arecibo telescope scans, no synthetic transmissions have yet been received. Considering that during the last 5 years signals from anywhere as close as this solar system to as far away as the edge of our galaxy could have been recieved, but have not, leads to a few hypotheses.


    One, all existing IL have evolved past the use of ER as a means to communicate. Even here on Earth communications are rapidly moving to cable and the Internet, neither of which have any significant radiation leaking into space. Two, our civiliation is the only one to have reached the stage of using ER for communications. Three, there are no other civilization 'out there', ours is the only one.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  22. downside... by LMCBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bummer. I will no longer be able to righteously correct slashdotters who ignorantly complain that SETI is "wasting" their tax dollars. :)

    I was always kind of proud of SETI for making it on private donations alone; it seemed like losing federal funds was the best thing that ever happened to them. Anyway, this grant is just for the Astrobiology Institute partnership; they still have their own funds for their normal operations.

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  23. Re:Waste of money by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think that if you really wanted to save money, SETI would be one of the last programs you should cut. The total budget is $10 million a year not including the cost of building new telescopes which were privately funded. The article doesn't mention how much the grants are worth but I don't think the amount is going to come anywhere near their budget. The US government alone has spent $60 billion dollars on a missile defense system that doesn't work yet. Compared to other programs, SETI is extremely cheap. Cutting funding to them to save money while useless programs 600x as large still exist is ludicrous.

    Unlike missile defense, SETI has at least succeeded in their original goal of mapping out 1000 stars. Their next goal is a million stars. Alternatively, SETI has succeeded in a another field. Because of their lack of funding, SETI's need for computing power helped to pioneer the use of grid computing. Although, this is a side benefit, SETI first showed how massive grid computing is possible at a minimal of expense.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  24. Funding? What funding? by nicodemus05 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We are funding a fictitious war over 100 million.

    There was a headlining story on the NYT yesterday:

    Gen. Tommy R. Franks said today that violence and uncertainty in Iraq made it unlikely that troop levels would be reduced "for the foreseeable future," and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld nearly doubled the estimated military costs there to $3.9 billion a month.

    My math might be worse than Dubya's, but I figure it at about $130 million A DAY.

    While it's great that we're "funding" SETI, perhaps some of the money we're pouring into Iraq would be better spent on science. Mars, anyone? Zubrin's plan calls for $30 billion for a long term program, just over 7 months worth of war. Which would you prefer, nonexistant WMDs or a manned landing on the Red Planet?

    --
    while (!sleep){

    sheep++;

    }

  25. So, their five-year mission... by centauri · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... is to seek out new life forms and new civilizations?

    /me desperately hopes no one has made this joke yet.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
  26. To shed some light on the subject by mcscary13 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I made a short documentary film about SETI last year covering the origins of the SETI search, Drake's equation, the various groups involved, and people's opinions about SETI. Maybe some of you might find it interesting. Its a 25 MB download in Quicktime format and you can find it here: http://homepage.mac.com/mcgeary/seti/ Enjoy!