Suborbital Rocketeers Ask FAA For Fair Rocketry Rules
HobbySpacer writes "John Carmack, Dennis Tito, Eric Anderson of Space Adventures, Brian Chase
of the National Space Society and other notables in the world of rocketry and space activism issued a call today for the FAA to cut the regulatory tangle that threatens to hold a nascent fleet of suborbital space vehicles firmly on the ground. The FAA needs to make it clear that these rocket vehicles fall under the jurisdiction of its own Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and not let intra-agency bureaucratic squabbles over control and power stall the development of this promising new industry."
"We're not happy until you're NOT happy."
They want CONGRESS to help cut through the bureaucracy?
Once they get done forming the committe to form the committe to investiage the possiblity of feasiblity the Chinese will all ready have colinized Mars.
Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
In other news, they're also searching for a suitable 'A' word so that the acronym doesn't look so stupid.
I am having trouble with all this red tape and would like your help with my rocket programme. I think that you should slacken the rules for us hard done by amateur rocket makers...
I also wonder if you could help fund my rocket programme like you have helped with my other projects in the past?
Regards
Osama b. Laden
I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
I don't care who's juristiction they fall under, it's who they fall on that worries me (-;
Hah! They also don't seem to understand contract law, copyright and patent law, and the difference between microwaves and gamma radiation!
If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
from Area 51? After all, there's nothing really there according to the government.
if they are suborbital, ;-)
don't they fall under the law of gravity?
(the ultimate authority in such matters...