Slashdot Mirror


The Introvert Advantage

fadden writes "When a friend of mine recommended this book, I wasn't quite sure what to make of it. I'm an introvert, but I didn't see what good reading about it was going to accomplish. I don't particularly need conversation starters or dating tips, so what's the point? The back cover claims, 'Filled with Aha! moments of recognition. Dr. Laney's book will help millions of introverts understand why they are misunderstood, learn to appreciate who they are, and develop a just-right life in a world where extroverts once ruled.' Sounds like hyperbole, but after reading the book I find myself in agreement." Fadden's complete review of The Introvert Advantage: How to Thrive in an Extrovert World follows; I wonder how true the claim is that introversion is truly hard-wired. The Introvert Advantage: How to Thrive in an Extrovert World author Marti Olsen Laney, Psy.D. pages 330 publisher Workman rating 9 reviewer Andy McFadden ISBN 0761125892 summary What it means to be an introvert, and how to cope with the other 75% of the population.

Most people don't understand what introversion is. I certainly didn't, despite delusions to the contrary. The book begins by explaining what being an "innie" is all about, using a light conversational tone and experiences from the (introverted) author's life. A number of misconceptions are examined and dispelled. For example, introversion is not shyness or a lack of social skills. It's temperament, hard wired in your genetic code, and cannot be altered. To give some flavor to the remarks, examples of introverts from fiction and real life (e.g. Abraham Lincoln, Michael Jordan, Steve Martin) are listed.

The book includes what has to be one of the weakest personality tests ever devised. The goal is to determine if you're an introvert, but it appears that most responsible adults qualify. Some of my clearly extroverted friends got nearly the same scores as introverts. Skip it.

That test aside, the author does an excellent job of reducing the difference between introverts and extroverts to one of energy levels. Extroverts have more energy -- and recharge by being around large groups of other people, while introverts have less, and recharge by being alone or with a very small group of close friends. The very things that energize "outies" will drain "innies," leading to the "party pooper" perception.

One of the strongest parts of the book is a discussion of the physiology of introversion. Differences in the dominance of sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems (the "fight or flight" and "throttle down" feedback systems) explain why introverts tend to go through the day at a lower energy level than extroverts. Introverts tend to be less vocal and more "blank", especially when mixed into groups of active extroverts.

The discussion of brain chemistry is equally fascinating: introverts use different neurochemicals for memory, which is why it can take some time (and perhaps REM sleep) for information to fully settle and process. Hence the tendency for great ideas to occur during the morning shower. The chemical mix also explains why the sorts of events that stimulate extroverts can quickly over-stimulate and wear out introverts.

Dealing with Extroverts The second part of the book is about dealing with significant others, children, and co-workers. The first chapter has sections on different relationship pairings (introvert male with extrovert female, introvert female with extrovert male, introvert with introvert). These are insightful and, frankly, would have saved me some grief had I read them a number of years ago. The author gives specific tips for improving communication and understanding in each situation.

The chapter on parenting gives tips on identifying introverted children and coping with them. This will be more useful for an extroverted parent, who perhaps doesn't understand why sitting quietly and reading has such a strong appeal. The chapter also has tips for introverted parents with extroverted kids, who need a little more outward show than the parents are perhaps used to giving.

A section on socializing and small talk is in this section, but such things have been covered more extensively in books on overcoming shyness.

Introverts and extroverts often rub up against one another in the workplace. In the last chapter in this section, the author raises a number of issues and suggests ways to cope with them. For example, introverts tend to immerse themselves in a particular project, and like to work without interruption for extended periods. Intrusions disrupt concentration, and regaining it takes time and energy. Extroverts enjoy the occasional interruption, because it gives them an energizing break and avoids monotony. Both sides expect the other to feel the same way, so extroverts interrupt others with quick questions (which annoys the introvert), and introverts try to avoid interrupting others (which makes extroverts see introverts as aloof). The chapter also discusses participation in meetings, giving presentations, and just dealing with people who "interface" differently.

There are other books on relationships, parenting, and on dealing effectively with others in the workplace. This is not the book that puts all others to shame, but if you're an introvert it covers the essentials.

Living in an Extroverted World The last part of the book discusses strategies for living in a world dominated by extroverts. How to manage your time, schedule your life in a way that won't cause overstimulation, how to re-energize through aromatherapy. There is some good advice here, but nothing really new or insightful.

The author points out that 75% of people are extroverts, and suggests that might explain why the quick-thinking life of the party is idealized. Introverts often have self-esteem problems because they can't be what most of the world wants them to be. The point of this book is to teach introverts why they are the way they are, to show them which aspects of their personality are immutable and which can be changed, and most of all to show that that there is nothing about introversion that requires making excuses.

Much of the value of this book is in the first third, where the psychology and physiology of introversion are treated as an integral whole. Discovering that personality quirks and the desire to ask "how long are we planning to stay at the party" are normal and expected behaviors is liberating. (I'll be launching the Introvert Liberation Front shortly.) The later sections range from "just okay" to very good, but even if you've seen such before it's worthwhile to get a different perspective. Other books -- many of which are listed in the bibliography -- have covered these topics with greater depth or breadth, but the focus on looking at life from an introvert's perspective separates this from most of them.

I highly recommend this book to introverts or to extroverts with an introvert in their life. (If you work in high tech, you're probably one or the other.)

You can purchase The Introvert Advantage: How to Thrive in an Extrovert World from bn.com. There is also a web site for the book, with merchandise, downloadable pamphlets, and discussion forums. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

37 of 684 comments (clear)

  1. Hm, not an introvert by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I am a pervert. Is there a good book about that for me?

    1. Re:Hm, not an introvert by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once again a simple Google search could have answered your question. :-)

  2. The obligatory joke... by NerveGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: How can you tell an extroverted computer geek from an introverted computer geek?

    A: The introverted computer geek will look at his shoes while he talks to you. The extroverted computer geek will look at your shoes while he talks to you.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:The obligatory joke... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it's also made me a lot of enemies out of people who think that geeks should not be so extroverted...

      I don't mean the following to sound harsh, but this behavior is typical of introverts.

      The reason it annoys people is because you're not being extroverted, you're just seeking attention. An extrovert enjoys making *social* connections to people. You're not connecting with people; you're just hoping they will notice you as a substitute for a true connection.

      A similar thing that introverts due (and geeks are notorious for) is replacing true conversation with being a walking encyclopia. Someone talks about the weather, and the geek goes on to explain strato cumulous clouds. It's not a conversation, it's a plea for attention. "Aren't I clever that I understand clouds".

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:The obligatory joke... by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless you're female.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:The obligatory joke... by Space+Coyote · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A similar thing that introverts due (and geeks are notorious for) is replacing true conversation with being a walking encyclopia. Someone talks about the weather, and the geek goes on to explain strato cumulous clouds. It's not a conversation, it's a plea for attention. "Aren't I clever that I understand clouds".

      Not that most reasonably intelligent introverts could stand a typical "how's the weather" small talk for very long. The thing is you always have to know your strenghts and play on those in a way that gets you connected to people. Many geeky types are very good listeners and do know how to ask questions that can get people to think about something in a different way.

      The ability to stimulate someone else's mind in the way that they can stimulate their own is an incredibly useful skill. This also far more useful than simply trying to emulate the typical conversations extrovert-types engage in with each other and only end up being frustrated.

      The two things to remember are empathy and practice.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
  3. The real difference by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    Extroverts think out loud while an introvert does it internally. Rather like the difference between an exoskeleton and an endoskeleton: same basic functionality, but the former is better off steamed with some garlic butter and a nice chilled wine.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:The real difference by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      mutter mutter pop psychology bull crap mutter mutter.

      If we're going to discuss the subject, I should point out that most of these psychological scale type thingies measure introversion-extroversion in two arenas: problem solving and personality. I'm very much an extrovert, in terms of my personality, but I'm an introverted problem solver.

      Both of these characteristics have changed over time, so I don't see how it's so interesting.

      I think these things say only slightly more about me than my astrological sign. I get the feeling that many of these pop psychology categorizer folks believe in astrology, too, though, so... at least there's one thing we can all agree on.

      I'm not sure if that came out right. Anyway, it's hooey.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  4. Misunderstood by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dr. Laney's book will help millions of introverts understand why they are misunderstood...

    I'm pretty sure my fascination with Slashdot contributes to this.

  5. Not my workplace! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Introverts and extroverts often rub up against one another in the workplace.

    Where does this guy work? :)

    If that ever happens around here, the extrovert usually goes "Eeeeeew", and I just shrug it off anyway and go back to reading Slashdot.

  6. Could be a step in the right direction. by xanderwilson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like a good alternative book for parents. Beats them buying a bunch of "What's Wrong with my Teenage Son" books or mistaking introversion for depression, when trying to deal with something they have trouble understanding. Alex.

  7. What if we just don't like stupidity? by g0hare · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since most people are stupid, and I don't like to waste my time, does that make me an introvert? Just because I don't want to chit-chat about Survivor or American Idol?

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:What if we just don't like stupidity? by ambisinistral · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know I'm hanging on every word you have to say. Calling everybody else stupid isn't a sign of introversion, it is a sign of arrogance.

      --

      deserve's got nothing to do with it...

    2. Re:What if we just don't like stupidity? by Eric+Savage · · Score: 4, Funny

      What is this "Survivor" and "American Idol" you speak of?

      --

      This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
    3. Re:What if we just don't like stupidity? by kfx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both are methods of propogating stupidity via electromagnetic radiation.

  8. There are chemicals to help introverts by typical+geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find a few quarts of ale energize me, and make me the most charming geek in the world.

    1. Re:There are chemicals to help introverts by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have a similar relationship with tequila. It makes me 8 feet tall, stunningly handsome and bulletproof.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:There are chemicals to help introverts by st1nky187 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I personally prefer to feed brownies to the unknowing extroverts and then watch em squirm in their chemically induced introversion. Suckers.

  9. Absolutely hardwired... by esobofh · · Score: 5, Informative

    In trying to understand my own psyche i've been doing alot of reasearch on the net.. I am quite certain that myers-briggs/jung typologies are pretty much dead on.. i've had so many 'aha' epiphany moments reading about my personality type (intj), it's made my work life, personal life, and everything in between so much better. Having an understanding of your strengths and weaknesses is definately a good thing, especially in this day and age. Learning to exploit yourself, is almost as good as exploiting others ;)

    http://www.humanmetrics.com has a great (free) typology test, but you have to remember to be dead honest with yourself when answering the questions (take your time!) once you have your personality type, the net makes it easy to 'find who you are'.

    --

    ----------------------------
    Esobofh - Currently drinking fresh mango juice.
  10. obligatory Russian joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Q: How do you tell if an Extroverted computer geek is Russian?

    A: His shoes look at you while he is talking.

  11. Good Link to BN.com by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, thanks for that link to bn.com -- I thought maybe I'd have needed to see daylight and maybe have to interact with someone at the cash register in order to buy the book.

  12. Dont know if I agree by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Introverts often have self-esteem problems because they can't be what most of the world wants them to be.

    In my experience low self esteem often occurs because someone cant be what they think the rest of the world wants them to be. Personally I always find this strange because I'm pretty sure the rest of world does not give a shit about me so I dont really care what the world thinks anyway.

    The point of this book is to teach introverts why they are the way they are, to show them which aspects of their personality are immutable and which can be changed, and most of all to show that that there is nothing about introversion that requires making excuses.

    Is personality, or certain personality traits immutable? I would have thought that with the right stimulation it would be highly mutable. Thats ignoring the fact that we are intelligent enought to recognise our own patterns of behaviour and can suppress our natural instincts if we make that choice.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  13. I'd buy a copy by sdibb · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd buy a copy at the bookstore, but then I'd have to go outside.

  14. I gave up the review early on by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...right about here:

    . It's temperament, hard wired in your genetic code, and cannot be altered.

    That's taking determinism a bit too far, I think. Genetic, perhaps -- but unalterable? Personality is not as incorrigible as that. There's no reason to assume that introversion is a defect or that it must be reversed, but claiming that it's inherently unalterable is just absurd.

    Introverts need to learn a little extroversion just to get along in life. Human beings are social creatures, and generally speaking, two heads are always better than one when solving problems. One doesn't need to make a lifestyle out of it, but IMO the sooner an introvert learns some of the basic "tricks" of reaching out to others, the better.

    1. Re:I gave up the review early on by daoine · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I've actually read this book, so I understand the approach that the reviewer is taking. I think you might be reading it wrong.

      The author does in fact define introversion as hard-wired, much like which hand you write with. After reading the book, it's not a far leap to make -- people think and react differently. [Growing up in a family mix of very introverted and very extroverted people, it was pretty obvious to me.] So, no, technically, it's not going to be altered.

      The value of the book comes in pointing out how introverted people function in an extrovert-oriented world; which, as the reviewer said, pretty much happens in the first 1/3 of the book.

      If nothing else, this book was a serious eye-opener for me. I'm a *very* extroverted person. My SO is *seriously* introverted -- I don't think I ever really had a clue about why he complained about being overwhelmed so much. Conversely, he never really understood why solitude made me so upset. While it's not the most scientific of books, it's an awfully good point to start a discussion.

  15. A Summary of Personality Development by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I took a class on personality development and we studied all the 'great' minds who have put forward theories on how we get the way we are. Froyd, Skinner, Jung, etc.

    I will now summarize for you what every one of them came up with.

    "This is what happened to me when I grew up. I think this is what basically happens to everyone when they grow up."

    I just saved you a semester of hard work.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  16. Myers-Briggs/Jungian types by holt_rpi · · Score: 5, Informative

    There used to be a much better Perl-based test out there based on the book, Please Understand Me by David Kiersey and Marilyn Bates, but I found this test out there. (You can go to Kiersey's self-promotional site too, but it looks like they use some form of communist registration/info-gathering technique before they let you take the test.)

    Introversion/Extraversion is simply one of many factors - in this organizational scheme, Jungian personality types adapted by Isabel Briggs Myers.

  17. Re:Program naked by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

    Depends if you're at the local coffee bar or curled up under the covers.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  18. Re:Sounded Great by Amoeba+Protozoa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The thing is about Myers-Briggs type indicators is that they aren't absolutes, they are preferences. When I was given a Myers-Briggs assessment, here was how the "exactitude" of the types were presented to me:

    The assessment booklet was placed before me and next to it was placed a piece of paper. I was asked if I was right or left handed. I told the test administrator that I was a righty and she handed me a pencil and told me to sign my name with my right hand on the piece of paper.

    When I had finished making my mark, she asked me then to sign the paper with my left hand. I had a hard time doing it, and really had to concentrate to get anything out of the pencil that remotely looked like what I had produced with my right hand.

    The moral to the story and the point I would like to make is what she had then told me next; even though I preferred to write with my right hand I was able to write with my left. My right hand was simply a preference, and a preference that often was more comfortable and produced higher quality output.

    Such, as she went on to explain to me, is how the Myers-Briggs preferences are. They are simply preferences. Just because, for example, one is introverted, it does not mean that they cannot be extroverted. It is simply uncomfortable for that particular individual as it is not that particular individual's preference.

    -AP

  19. I disagree by Syncdata · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The whole idea of splitting people into categories like this is really stupid
    Obviously you're entitled to your opinion, but people do fit into categories. Slobs vs neat freaks, People who go home and watch E! true hollywood story, and those who would rather learn something worthwhile.
    Phrenology is based on physical characteristics determining your degree of mongrelism. The degree of a persons introversion is determined by observation of that persons actions/reactions. The scientific method is applied in the latter, whereas the former is rightly qualified as garbage.
    I will agree though that it's not quite clean cut on this issue. Put an Extrovert and an introvert in a /. discussion and watch the two switch categories. As we are amply demonstrating herein. Then again, I would say that the BSD is dead guy is likely an extrovert, if not a robot.

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
  20. Re:Introvert geeks: by Maniakes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and take some anti-anxiety pills

    Introversion != Social Anxiety

    The former is, as described in the article, a temperment issue. Introverts tend to enjoy being alone or with a few close friends. Extroverts tend to find this boring. Extroverts tend to enjoy interacting with large groups of strangers. Introverts tend to find this tiresome.

    Social anxiety is a paralyzing fear of social interaction caused by brain chemistry. People with SA are usually unhappy because they want social interaction but can't handle it, while introverts can handle social interaction but don't want to.

    --
    A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
  21. Re:could you point me to the research please by HanzoSan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MY own experience, and from most other introverts I've spoken to.

    One thing is in common, they dont like being around people, why? Well most of them had bad experiences with people in the past.

    Kinda like a rape victim suddenly doesnt like to be around guys, or a person who would always get chased by dogs would hate being around dogs.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  22. Introverts converse for different reasons by daksis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I disagree - Many introverts see conversation as a medium for exchanging information. When a "geek" explains what he/she knows about a current topic, they are doing several things:

    1. They are setting the base line for what they know about the topic
    2. They are indicating that they have been listening to what the other person just said. Many times people accuse introverts of being poor listeners because they do not have the same obtrusive behaviors that the prototypical good listener does.
    3. They are requesting that you share any information that they have not yet demonstrated a working knowledge of.

    Most introverts could care less about the attention, (we'll skip the obligatory Maslow's Hierarchy comment) and will often keep silent regarding a topic to avoid drawing attention to themselves. Indeed, many introverts find that "being clever" is the best way to attract the ire of those around them. Many introverts find conversation to be of less interest unless the energy expended to talk to a person garners something in return... like new information or trivia. (Introverted conversations often start "Did you know that....".)

    Let's remember that there are reasons to have a conversation that don't involve "social connections" of the extroverted ilk. Introverts communicate differently and for different reasons.

  23. Re:Its only painful due to experiience. by crazyphilman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How utterly true.

    I was tortured and abused throughout my childhood by most of the other kids, and in my twenties when I went back to college (after a stint in the Marine Corps to toughen up and not get picked on anymore) I was older than the other kids and an outsider for a whole new set of reasons. Most of my life, all I wanted was to be left alone with my books, and I had to put up with all kinds of garbage from almost everyone. It wasn't until I was thirty years old and moved upstate, taking a government job (where most of the people are older and more settled) that I finally found a group of people (fellow programmers, of course) who just accepted me as-is, with a minimum of hassle. Of course, they're all pretty introverted too, so it all works out. I've got a nice, quiet working environment with really cool, quiet, hands-off coworkers, and I'm finally happy after all these years.

    Outside of work, of course, I'm a hermit.

    Because, after all, what would I do around most people? Look at it from my perspective:

    I: ...don't watch much television, because it's stupid, boring, and annoying, and the commercials drive me crazy. I like anime, so the pay channels sometimes attract me, and I like movies, so the movie channels aren't bad, but usually I prefer something a little more active, like a good game. ...don't pay any attention to professional sports because, really, what's so interesting about gigantic musclebound thugs slamming into one another? Or scratching their nuts and throwing a ball around? It's BORING. Maybe if a kickboxing match was on, I dunno. I always kinda respected those guys, they were tough as nails. But, they don't put that stuff on much anymore. ...don't pay any attention to right-wing nutcases like uber-republican Rush Limbaugh. Once you get past the initial humorous part ("did he just say that? He's kidding, right?") you realize he's serious and it just seems sad. ...don't care whether I get laid or not, or whether I'm surrounded by people, because I can amuse myself most of the time with a book or a video game. Or, my BSD laptop and some coding.

    So, what the heck would I talk about with people? All their favorite conversational topics are non-starters with me (sex, right-wing politics, sports, television). I talk about my work and their eyes glaze over. I mention anime and they give me this "yeah, ok, great" look. As if their sitcoms were adult fare... We have nothing in common.

    I figure, if I don't find a similarly antisocial girl who has the same interests by the time I'm 40, I'm just not going to reproduce. Maybe one day I'll clone myself, just for the techie bragging rights, but probably not. ;)

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  24. Re:could you point me to the research please by stwrtpj · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One thing is in common, they dont like being around people, why? Well most of them had bad experiences with people in the past.

    I'm not sure I quite agree with that. I think this may be a chicken-and-the-egg scenario.

    Take me for example. I tend towards the introverted side, at least in that I don't care for large social engagements (even as I type this, my colleagues at work are on the department picnic, and I declined to attend because it's just not my scene).

    Now, when I was growing up, I admit to being the one that was picked on and bullied a lot. But from my recollections, and what my Dad tells me, I was always on the reserved side. So it's not a cut-and-dry case with me. Did I become introverted because of being picked on, or did I get picked on because I was introverted? Tough call.

    I decline to go to social engagements not because I don't like being around people, but simply because there are usually other things I would rather be doing that happen to be more inward-focused, or focused towards my wife and I (who is also introverted, and from her background, might also dispute the which-came-first argument).

    --
    Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  25. Re:I would.. by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 4, Funny

    really witty esoteric apropos joke

    Now *there's* a plea for attention if I ever saw one. Trying to wow us with your vocabulary, while trolling the grammar nazis because of your missing commas, and going for the "heh" dry humor laugh. I think you're an extrovert just pretending to be an introvert.

    You poser. We'll take you down a notch.

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  26. Re:It has nothing to do with brain chemistry. by willtsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It has nothing to do with brain chemistry.
    Its a choice, people make a choice to be introverted or extroverted.


    You probably believe that homosexuality is ALSO a choice.

    Believe me, introverts are the minority and they often suffer pretty heavily from it. Throughout youth and young adult-hood, the mode of social gatherings is a complete mystery to them.

    It's difficult to understand why everyone is having so much fun at a party EXCEPT you. You try hard to act like your having fun, but you can't fake it to yourself. If it was a choice don't you think we would choose NOT to suffer.

    Sometime when your not thouroughly satisified that you know everything, you may actually want to do some reading on psychology. You'll find that people do scientific research and have good proof for why some behaviors and characteristics seem based on "nature" and others are based more on "nurture".

    Sometimes choice enters the equation, but most often we are almost complete products of our environment or ourselves. The "choices" we make are often made for us long before we ever ponder the question. Typically, when things aren't working out right, you know you actually overcame your biology and "chose" something against your nature.

    For example, right now I'm assuming that you didn't "choose" to be an ignorant, arrogant ass-hole. Something in your nature or upbringing led you to this point. You can overcome the ignorance through LISTENING and READING beyond your knowledge. However, you may indeed ALWAYS be an ass-hole!!!!

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!