Slashdot Mirror


Third Party Selling Upgraded G4 Cubes

cybercyph writes "A 3rd party is selling upgraded G4 cubes. The upgraded cubes have a 1.2 GHz G4 processor, GeForce 3 card with 64 MB RAM, 1 GB RAM (upgradable to 1.5) and a 120 GB hard drive! I can't imagine this making Apple too happy..." They are asking $1879, which is comparable to a similarly equipped new G4 from Apple.

82 comments

  1. Need a laptop? by CptChipJew · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want a third party upgraded laptop, MCE is selling iBooks equipped with DVD-R/CD-R optical drives.

    There was another company back in the day who's name skips my mind, but they also sold upgraded Macs until Apple gave them the cease and desist. So I would expect the same thing to happen here eventually.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Need a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats, you just put MCE out of business too :(

    2. Re:Need a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The story can be seen here. This isn't brand new news. (The iBook thing)

    3. Re:Need a laptop? by MacEnvy · · Score: 1

      I'd be wary of that, though. The G3 processor - especially at lower-end iBook speeds of 500-700 MHz - really doesn't have the oomph to reliably master a DVD. I suspect owners of these aftermarket drives end up with a lot of $2 coasters. Personally, I wouldn't burn a DVD on anything less than an 800 G4 unless I really had to. The processor just can't handle that much data that quickly. They may be available, but they're probably not a great idea unless you don't have an alternative.

      --


      ***
    4. Re:Need a laptop? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Congrats, you just put MCE out of business too :(

      If their business depends on nobody finding out about it, I'd say it's not much of a business.

    5. Re:Need a laptop? by mkldev · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'd be very surprised if that were the case. An iBook 900 can easily move well over 2 megs/second between its hard drive and the optical drive. A 1x DVD-R burn only requires about 1.3 megs/second.

      Now, I wouldn't even think about actually using a G3 machine to do the encoding for obvious speed reasons, but I can't imagine such a machine not being fast enough to burn one. :-)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  2. I wouldn't buy one now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll have a C&D letter in by morning, if it isn't already sitting on their FAX machine.

    1. Re:I wouldn't buy one now.... by sribe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They'll have a C&D letter in by morning, if it isn't already sitting on their FAX machine.

      No they won't! Apple has contracts with their dealers which prohibit all sorts of activities they deem undesirable wrt machines bought from Apple intended for retail sale. But Apple has nothing--repeat after me--Apple has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to say about the trade in used Macs. They have no legal right to do so, nor would they have any conceivable reason to even try. (And please note that reselling used Macs is quite different from trying to scrounge repair parts, build FrankenMacs, and sell those.)

    2. Re:I wouldn't buy one now.... by General+Sherman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly true. If it weren't eBay and such would have a whole lot of hell to catch from apple for reselling old macs with upgrade cards installed.

      --
      - Sherman
  3. Two Thoughts by burns210 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The upgraded cubes have a 1.2 GHz G4 processor, GeForce 3 card with 64 MB RAM, 1 GB RAM (upgradable to 1.5) and a 120 GB hard drive!"

    This is cool and all, but why can't they have 256meg ram and a 20-40gig harddrive and shave several hundred dollars of the price?

    On a slightly offtopic rant:
    Many have said Apple needs to compete in the (more) lowend market... I would think a headless g3 would be the way to go... $500-$800, 128meg ram, 20gig hdd, etc. in a cube-like case without a monitor would be HUGE for apple, in my opinion. Even to the point shaving off the Apple markup and selling these things at a near no-profit, just to get lots of units sold.

    1. Re:Two Thoughts by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      sounds like you're talking about a PPC LCII. It'd be nice. Although I suspect if they did that, people would start questioning, 'if X computer is only $500, then why is Y computer $3500, buy into the whole "macs are much more expensive than PCs" thing', and just buy a pc, rather than get a $800-1000 eMac. i'd buy one, though.

      whee.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Two Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: why can't they have 256meg ram and a 20-40gig harddrive and shave several hundred dollars of the price?

      First, three 256mb PC-133 DIMMs can be had for under a hundred dollars. Second, 20-40gb hard drives aren't even manufactured anymore; thanks to the economy of scale, it costs just as much to manufacture those as an 80gb HD.

      So no, slashing the specs wouldn't result in a less expensive machine. The real question is why Apple doesn't ship machines with more RAM, as the benefits are huge and the cost is minimal.

    3. Re:Two Thoughts by CyberBry · · Score: 1

      Apple already sells cheap G4 systems in the form of the eMac.

      http://www.apple.com/emac/

      --

      ----
      Bryan Samis
      http://www.thesamis.net
    4. Re:Two Thoughts by shaitand · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, 256mb ram, $40, Now you've chopped $100 off the price, 120 to 40g harddrive... still about $100 so no real savings here (maybe $10?).

      So for $1700 I can get the exact same thing with 256mb ram instead of 1 gig... for $1800 it better be a hell of alot more machine than what they are already selling for me to buy it, not less.

    5. Re:Two Thoughts by vanye · · Score: 1


      That the exact spec I want... a small server appliance I can run Panther Server on.

      For $1000 I can get a iBook, an eMac or PowerMac G4. Neither quite fits what I want.

      Something like the Cobalt Qube, but running OS X Server.

      Something with

      2 ethernet ports (3 preferred)
      512Mb memory max
      30Gb disk max
      no need for keyboard/display to run, only needed for installation.
      small form factor/Cube ideal or ~iBook size that was stackable,
      limited OS X Server license (3 clients) to not compete with full OS X server retail product.
      No expansion except firewire400, its supposed to be an appliance. Firewire required for backup.
      CD-ROM only required, although firewire expansion could be dropped if DVD-R was included.

      The more expensive they are the further they get from being an appliance, at $500 I'd have one for web-serving, one for mail server, one for firewall etc. At $800, I'd probably make do with just one.

    6. Re:Two Thoughts by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Because then it would suck.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  4. Indeed... by =weezer= · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We at Kemplar.com are proud to offer the upgraded Apple Cube G4 for a limited time."

    I guess we'll see how limited . .

    1. Re:Indeed... by stevebob2019 · · Score: 0

      There's not an infinite amount of used G4 cubes to upgrade. They can only do so many.

  5. 10.3 INcompatable? by slughead · · Score: 0

    Didn't I read somewhere that 10.3 is going to nerf all 3rd party processors like sonnet (which this thing uses)?

    If any of you are really interested in a dual bootable g4, as always it's probably best to go with one from apple's website (for the price of this thing you can get some serious power). Just go to The Apple Store and scroll down to the "power mac g4" (it's below the software).

    For $100 more than this thing, you can get a GeForce4Ti and garaunteed 10.3 support.

    1. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by Visigothe · · Score: 3, Informative

      You heard incorrectly.

      What has been nerfed are the old machines that were never really qualified to run OS X, but can be tricked into doing so if you have a 3rd party CPU upgrade card. Of course, there will be hacks to get them to work again. I wouldn't be too worried.

      The other thing that you may have heard is that it will be almost impossible for a G=4 machine to be upgraded to a G5. This is because the G5 board architecture is *vastly* different than the G3 and G4. That being said, "impossible" has been done before.

    2. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by JMZorko · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't think this is the case at all -- a lot of people would be tres miffed at Apple if they did this. I would think, due to the open-source nature of Darwin, that any incompatabilities would be worked out for new processor upgrade cards -- witness Sonnet and others being able to make 10.2.x run on them.

      Regards,

      John

      --
      Falling You - beautiful
    3. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it may be possible to plug a G5 into a G5 motherboard, the FSB speed would cripple it, possibly to below G4 speeds.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by mkldev · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I assume you meant "into a G4 motherboard". I'm not sure about being below G4 speeds, but it would definitely cripple it.

      A more interesting upgrade card design would be similar to the Sonnet G3 upgrade for the PowerMac 7200. It's basically a single-board computer with its own RAM, etc. on the card, but using the MLB for peripherals via the PCI bus. An upgrade card design like that could easily bring reasonable single-processor G5 performance to a G4 or G3 machine, albeit probably at a much higher price than a G4 upgrade card (and possibly at a higher price than a G5 machine itself).

      The real question becomes the line between possible and practical, and I'm not really sure where that line might be.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    5. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, all beige G3's have been knocked from the list. Trust me, I tried to run Panther- It kernal panics on boot. It doesn't even get past the Apple Logo before KP'ing. Any non-USB machine is unsupported by Panther, in short.

    6. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      I'll put in a vote right now that upgrading existing G4 systems to G5's truly is impossible, or at least not worthwhile, and it will never ever happen. The bus architecture is too different. Far too different.

    7. Re:10.3 INcompatable? by Dr_Cornholio · · Score: 1

      Cripple it??? It would dang near kill it. If the G5 has to have a bus speed half that of the CPU, you'd have the world's slowest G5 running at a snail's pace of 200Mhz! Forget that idea! But it would be intersting to pit against a 350Mhz iMac, just to see how it would compare

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
  6. Dumbasses by mjpaci · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can anyone out there tell my why Apple would send a C&D to this company? All they're doing is buying old stock of Cubes, upgrading parts of them, and reselling them. They're not claiming that they're made by Apple. They're just being a VAR in the used market.

    --Mike

    1. Re:Dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not claiming that they're made by Apple.

      Golly Mr. "Smart" ass, who made them, then? ;-)

    2. Re:Dumbasses by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember, Apple was the company who tried to sue anybody who made a competing GUI product.

      If Apple had won that particular suit, you'd be paying Apple a royalty every time you installed another copy of XFree86. Luckily, Microsoft blew them away in court.

      They're litigious folk. Like the MPAA and the RIAA, much of their revenue comes from 'image' and they have to protect that image.

    3. Re:Dumbasses by jceaser · · Score: 2

      No, Microsoft was invited to work close with Apple back in the day so they could write apps for the mac. Microsoft was allowed to see the os code for reasons only known to Apple (the manager who allowed this must have been really gulable). Microsoft used this access to write windows. They also use access IBM gave them to view the code for OS/2. Windows is a combination (at least in some parts of the os) of Mac and OS/2. This is why both apple and ibm took microsoft to court. Microsoft is dominate today, not becouse of technical merit, but becouse they hire much better lawers (and Marketing teams) than any other tech company.
      But I suppose you beleve the entire world is much better now that "90%" of the computer market is controled by one company. Becouse conformity has always inspired the best results throughout human history.

    4. Re:Dumbasses by jceaser · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft was invited to work close with Apple back in the day so they could write apps for the mac. Microsoft was allowed to see the os code for reasons only known to Apple (the manager who allowed this must have been really gulable). Microsoft used this access to write windows. They also use access IBM gave them to view the code for OS/2. Windows is a combination (at least in some parts of the os) of Mac and OS/2. This is why both apple and ibm took microsoft to court. Microsoft is dominate today, not becouse of technical merit, but becouse they hire much better lawers (and Marketing teams) than any other tech company. But I suppose you beleve the entire world is much better now that "90%" of the computer market is controled by one company. Becouse conformity has always inspired the best results throughout human history.

    5. Re:Dumbasses by jceaser · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the double post. User Error.

    6. Re:Dumbasses by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Apple sued in what is referred to as 'the look and feel suit' along with Lotus. They sued various other developers who produced GUI code that 'looked' like Macintosh.

      When did IBM take Microsoft to court in concert with Apple?

      And your last comment. Being anti-Microsoft means anything you assert has to be taken at face value? And anybody who doesn't agree with your Apple-marketing(?) contrived 'history' is pro-Microsoft?

    7. Re:Dumbasses by jceaser · · Score: 1

      When did IBM take Microsoft to court in concert with Apple?
      In the 80's after IBM and Microsoft stopped working on OS/2 but it was not cordinated with Apple's suit.

      As for the last statment, I don't quite understand your language but I will try to answer it. It was prohaps a bit off topic, more of me tring to explain that everyone using the same os is not the best way to do things IMHO. The computer industry would be better served with many different products allowing users to pick which one best suits there needs, which is not what we have today. Today, Micrsoft is becoming the only real choice with everyone else being told that they should conform or get lost. On top of this, people feel the need to run around forums and speed FUD about OS's that they don't like. There is no reason to paint Apple under the light as being totaly wrong under every condition for wanting to defend there product image in the court. I'm sure they had there reasons and since they have less than 5% of the market anyways what difference does it make. If you don't like Macintosh's, fine, but stop with the FUD.

  7. Place your bets by pafmax · · Score: 1

    I would bet between 24-48 hours, before apple releases their hounds of war: the Apple lawyers.

    Yet, I would by one of those Cubes, if I had the money...

    I'll keep dreaming on a G5 :)

  8. Very Smart by stevebob2019 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple has no way to shut them down because they don't have to go through apple retailers for the processors. Who doesn't like the cube? This is very smart business. Apple won't be very happy about this.

  9. the cube is cute and all... by rollthelosindice · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But I just got a DUAL 1.25 G4 for 1799.

    Granted it only has 512 of ram, but we all now how cheap ram is these days, and i can max out at 2 GB not 1.5.

    It's cool. It's got commodity, but its more money and less power than what apple is selling. And like someone else said, mine will definitely work with panther.

    1. Re:the cube is cute and all... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      You weren't willing to wait for the G5? :)

  10. Great Form, So-So Function by borkus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The cube is one of the most original looking systems. However, the design always struck me as a little impractical. The optical power switch on top was prone to sending the system to sleep unexpectedly. The USB ports, ethernet port and modem connection were on the bottom, keeping the cables in order. However it also meant that you either had to turn the system over or grope around under system to connect peripherals.

    You can just as easily get a stylish iMac for the same price.

    1. Re:Great Form, So-So Function by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1, Funny

      I already have a table lamp. Wait... that's supposed to be a computer?

    2. Re:Great Form, So-So Function by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Funny

      With iLamp it's both! Two functions in one, at no extra cost!

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re:Great Form, So-So Function by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Hey, there is nothing cooler than waving your hand over the top of your Cube to make it go to sleep...This isn't the PC you think it is.

  11. Best of luck to 'em by inkswamp · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The problem with the cube at the time of its release is the same problem it has now: it's neither-nor. I don't think upgraded cubes will interest anyone, but I wish the folks doing it the best of luck. The cube's problem was that it stradled the gray area between consumer and pro machine. It's not a consumer machine because it's pricey and doesn't come with a monitor. It's not a pro machine because, while it used top-of-the-line components when it came out, it wasn't expandable enough to make pros happy. So it's a niche product within a niche market. I remember seeing an article about how Oprah Winfrey had bought a cube and loved it, and thinking "that's who they will be selling to--wealthy people who like the looks of the machine and don't care if they have to buy a monitor along with it." There are only so many people out there fitting that profile to sell these things to.

    BTW, I'm a Mac user and I thought the cube was a great looking machine so no flames for this, thankyouverymuch.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Best of luck to 'em by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, the Cube sold about 28,000 units during its entire run. That's pretty bad considering that they sold about 127,000 desktops during the last quarter alone, when everyone was waiting for the G5s to be announced.

    2. Re:Best of luck to 'em by Kerouassady · · Score: 1

      Well, there are people out there (I know some at work) that loved the Cube because it took up less desk space. Weird as it may seem, some people don't want to buy a bigger desk and wanted to keep an old, larger (than iMac) monitor, or wanted a bigger monitor than the iMac had to offer. The big problem was marketing to the right market. They started out too expensive and they marketed to them to "executive" types that wanted a "powerful" (at the time) machine that didn't take up much desk. Plus the fairly well-know bugs that plagued it in the beginning didn't help. Towards the end, they dropped the price and started marketing them to people who wanted more than an iMac but didn't want the bulk of a PowerMac or care about expansion (which, actually, most consumer-types don't). They also started with rebates on buying them with monitors, which gave you the right amount of USB ports (having only two USB, knowing one was automatically subtracted by the keyboard always bugged me, on all models, til they got it right with the new iMac). It was definitely the fore runner of these Shuttle cases and all these little media boxes. I hope the Cube returns one day. It sorta returned as the new iMac. A lot of Cube technology ended up there. It really needed a fan at the bottom too. Interestingly enough, someone at Apple must have thought so too, since there is actually a case fan mount built into the bottom. It could be nice as competition for the Windows Media boxes. Bundle in some DVR software and a Superdrive, and that might be a good niche product, since there have been rumors of a set-top product for years now.

    3. Re:Best of luck to 'em by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1
      I was in the market for a college computer when the Cube came out so I spent that day deciding what to buy. I already had a monitor and was planning on a tower but since the Cube came out I check it out as well. What it came down to was for like 10% (~$200) more I got a second CPU (OS X was coming), more HD, 4 ram slots (I even used them all up), plus room for more HD's & PCI cards.

      After the price drop $1300 it was a tempting buy, but by that time it was to late. The Cube was for rich people like Opra or graphic artists who just loved it's footprint. Then apples stock crashed but that is another story...

    4. Re:Best of luck to 'em by Golias · · Score: 1
      It's not a pro machine because, while it used top-of-the-line components when it came out, it wasn't expandable enough to make pros happy.

      If that were true, how is it that these guys are selling a dramatically-upgraded cube?

      All the pissing and moaning about "pros need lots of PCI slots," has been made obsolete years ago by the built-in Gigabit ethernet, AGP video, and Firewire. Sure, old-school PC users (and people who worked in Mac-based editing shops) are accustomed to the belief that you need 1 PCI card for Ethernet, another for a modem, another for video, another for sound, another for SCSI, and even more if you are any kind of a "power user." Those days are gone, at least as far as the Mac world is concerned. Today's video demands require AGP. Built-in sound on the Mac is darn good. The built-in Ethernet on Macs continues to be far enough ahead of the curve that the motherboard will be obsolete before the Ethernet port is. (My old G3 tower, which I am thinking of selling off, used 100baseT, which is still faster than the hubs in my house, and the cards in my old Linux boxen.) The built in modem is certainly better than the WinModems that most PC users end up buying. Most SCSI needs have been made redundant by faster ATA standards and Firewire.

      Want a RAID? Forget about a SCSI card. Stripe some Firewire drives. Want two monitors? There are AGP video cards which do that on one card. Need bluetooth to sync your phone with your old iMac? Belkin sells a perfectly good USB Bluetooth transmitter. Scanners, cameras, printers, audio signal processors, video feeds, unusual input devices, pretty much anything you can name can now be connected via USB or Firewire, no need to buy a card.

      When Firewire and USB was new, I did need one (1) slot for a SCSI card on my G3 tower to support legacy hardware... but that was years ago. Today I do everything I did then with an iBook, and have no trouble finding devices that work with it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Best of luck to 'em by Golias · · Score: 1
      (having only two USB, knowing one was automatically subtracted by the keyboard always bugged me, on all models, til they got it right with the new iMac)

      All Mac keyboards are equipped with 2-port USB hubs, so you are actually adding a port when plugging in the keyboard, not subtracting one.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Best of luck to 'em by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Edina Monsoon also had one shortly after their release.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  12. Whoop de doo by Xyde · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wow, a whole 1.2GHz G4 on a 100MHz system bus!

    And all in an out of warranty cube which is already maxed (you can add a whole 512MB extra RAM and the controller is only ATA66 so no drives > 120GB for you!) out so no room for future upgrades! for $1879 it sounds like a steal to me, especially with those pokey G5's retailing for a bloated $1999.

    Get real.

    Unless you have some sort of cube fetish, really - whats the point, for $120 extra you can have yourself a 64 bit workstation that's likely 3x as powerful. With room to grow. And warranty. And new technology like bluetooth and FW800.

    I honestly can't imagine Apple caring less either way.

    1. Re:Whoop de doo by andrewleung · · Score: 2, Informative

      one word: hearing

      yup, ever since i got my hearing back because of the fan less cube, i've cared less and less for higher end machines. thought about upgrading but fans drive me nuts.

      my friend was at WWDC and played with the G5... when that baby is going, you can HEAR the sucking sound. independently controlled my ass!

      anyways, i'll enjoy the music i buy from the iTunes store without the background hiss :-)

    2. Re:Whoop de doo by jwhitnah · · Score: 1

      Guess your hearing has not fully recovered. The g5, while not silent is much quieter than the current g4 powermac.

      --
      Joe
    3. Re:Whoop de doo by jwhitnah · · Score: 1

      I agree. Only a sentimental fool would buy an unsupported overpriced box that can't compete with a BRAND NEW MACHINE with 1 GHz FSB! Sucker born every minute.

      --
      Joe
    4. Re:Whoop de doo by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone cares. http://www.cubeowner.com/ has the following: UPDATE: July 16, 2003 - the response to these units has been overwhelming and these upgraded Cubes have SOLD OUT! Kemplar is accepting pre-orders for a new batch, which should be shipping within the next 2 weeks. If I could get something like this in Australia I'd be seriously temped.

    5. Re:Whoop de doo by Xyde · · Score: 1
      No, this upgraded G4 cube will not be silent.

      The original cube had a 450mhz G4, an ATi rage 128, and (I think) a 5400 rpm hard drive. And they regularly overheated in some climates.

      Now, if you for one minute think that a G4 cube upgraded with a GeForce 3, a 7200RPM 120gb hard drive and a 1.2ghz G4 chip is going to run fanless, well, I've got a molten puddle of silicone and plastic to sell you.

      This will have a fan. A BIG one.

    6. Re:Whoop de doo by shawnce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a quick note...

      ATA66 can support greater then > 120GB drives if the controller support 48b LBAs. ATA66 was defined as part of the same standard revision that define 48b support, AFAICR it simply wasn't required.

      So having ATA66 doesn't automatically imply that you cannot use larger then 120GB drives... in the case of the Cube, to my knowledge, its controller does not support 48b LBAs (as you noted).

    7. Re:Whoop de doo by HyperMac · · Score: 1

      You are correct. It's not fanless anymore. My 1.2GHz, GeForce 3, 120GB HD, SuperDrive upgraded Cube has a single 80mm fan in the base (aside from the fan on the GF3.

      And my Tivo is still louder than my Cube.

      There are a good number of happy Cube owners out there who are very happy with their computer and they are well aware of what their other options are in the current Apple marketplace. My choice of computer works for me. What difference does it make to anyone else what I happen to choose?

  13. Why would Apple bother? by theolein · · Score: 0, Redundant

    These are refurbished machines, and run with a slower bus than other more modern G4's. There are people, like William Gibson, and other VIPs who love the styling of these machines, and might buy one from time to time. Power to them.

  14. Already have a Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you already own a G4 cube there are a variety of upgrade options. I recently found them myself.

    PowerLogix and Sonnet both offer upgrade cards. Many video cards fit (and can be made to submit) inside. These upgrades usually imply removing the heat sinks and adding a fan.

    The hard drive isn't too have to upgrade - if you have a 10T Torx wrench just lying about.

    www.cubeowner.com is a great resource.

    Dav

    1. Re:Already have a Cube? by Marovingian · · Score: 1

      I just upgraded my Cube's internal drive about two weeks ago, and I had to run to Sears to purchase a 9T Torx driver for this very thing- my 10T was too big.

      --
      Cursing in the French language is like wiping your ass with silk.
    2. Re:Already have a Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10T's are commonly available, but Apple uses 8T. 9T wrenches might work, though. I personally found Radio Shack to have a decent 8T head in a socket set along with a couple standard, a couple phillips, and at least 3 other Torx heads. $7.99 USD.

      I used the 8T to replace the HD in my PBG3 Lombard.

    3. Re:Already have a Cube? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Since Final Cut Pro 4 requires AGP, something my 550 MHz G4-equipped B&W G3 doesn't have, I'm looking to make my 450 MHz G4 Cube my video editing station. But with RT Extreme wanting at least 500 MHz, Shake 3 requiring at least 800 MHz, and who knows what DVD Studio Pro 2 will require, I've been looking at upgrading my Cube.

      However, I still have worries. PowerLogix upgrades don't work well in conjunction with sleep mode (won't wake up unless booted from CD) and Sonnet 1.2 GHz upgrades have been reported as blowing the VRM (DC-DC board) and no comments on where replacements are available. (Also usual fate of systems with unapproved dual processor upgrades.) Though at least one such report for the PowerLogix as well.

      So, either risk my G4 Cube for around $500 (how much will the replacement True Cube 10" case cost?), or get either a dual 1.25 GHz G4 or a 1.6 GHz G5 with the rest of the optional features more-or-less equal for $1970 (no modems). Sure, the G4 only has 4X AGP and no S/PDIF I/O (tasty), and if I go faster on the G5 I get PCI-X, but the G4 does have twice as many drive bays (4 and 2 optical) compared to the G5 (2 and 1). That just may be my deciding factor, seeing as I've modded my B&W G3's interior with a PC's cage for more drive space (externalizing the power switch module) and want to bring over the video on its drives.

      Have the G4s dropped in price since the G5 release?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  15. G4 Cube by iJed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The G4 Cube was in my opinion the best Apple system ever introduced. It was nearly totally silent since it used convection cooling, reduced cable clutter since connections were all on the bottom, near full PowerMac performance and had upgradable CPU and graphics cards. Hopefully one day Apple will introduce a new version of the Cube with a G5 (assuming the can get the thing to run cool enough!)

    1. Re:G4 Cube by Kevinv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they are nice, and apple really led charge on the small system form factor.

      downside to the cube is, personally, i don't like the connectors on the bottom, well there should be at least a usb and firewire on the front. a hub would help, but that expands the footprint.

      and repair absolutely sucks. i had to replace an ethernet card in a friends cube and it was a huge process -- you have to completely dismount the motherboard to replace it, no easy task in itself.

      wouldn't have been such a hassle if someone had a usb-ethernet driver for OS X.

      other than that they are sweet machines. i'd love to have even an old one as a wireless MP3 server and to leave permantly connected to my firewire video converter to do imports with.

    2. Re:G4 Cube by iomud · · Score: 1

      You're pretty much alone on that because the cube was the biggest commercial flop since the next cube. Lots of thought went into it but you can't sell something for $3000 with an almost non-existant upgrade path and a cloudy target market. If you put a G5 in it, it's going to cause the same confusion that the cube originally created. Who is this machine for? Consumers? Prosumers? It certainly won't be for the high end market of the current G5. It just doesn't fit well with Apple's current offerings. With portables selling like hotcakes in both pc and mac markets the most room for advancement in design and technology lies there me thinks.

    3. Re:G4 Cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "other than that they are sweet machines. i'd love to have even an old one as a wireless MP3 server and to leave permantly connected to my firewire video converter to do imports with."

      Better machines available for this kind of thing - however, my cube is my hi/fi / iTunes sytem - running headless with Remote Desktop. - A thing of beauty for sure.

  16. their appeal by cybercyph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the basis of the appeal of this deal to me is the cube...i don't think anyone would bat an eye at this if it were an old imac refurb, but apple somehow struck a nerve with the cube. i've never heard anyone describe the cube as anything but sexy. the question then becomes: what premium are you willing to pay for sexy? many people are willing to sacrafice speed for sexiness, many others will not. personally, as a poor college student, i couln't afford either, and thus am stuck with my dual-cracked hinge ti powerbook. (because of the hinges, i have to constantly prop the display up against something. right now, a pillow...sigh...)

    1. Re:their appeal by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      stuck with my dual-cracked hinge ti powerbook. (because of the hinges, i have to constantly prop the display up against something. right now, a pillow...sigh...)

      Suggestion-- Go pick up one of those $39 aftermarket carrying handles that screw onto the back of the TiBook. The handle mounts will physically limit the screen to tilt back only about 10 degrees from vertical, which should solve your problem.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  17. 10.3 works on OWC G4 550 ZIF by douglasq · · Score: 1

    I installed 10.3 on a partition just to poke around a bit and it works fine. My machine is a Blue and White G3 upgraded to a 550 Mhz G4. Of course, who knows what may change with the final product. I think the negative PR would outweigh the financial benefit if Apple were to do that.

    --
    "Form should follow function...unless it's just plain ugly."
  18. Appeals to the B & O customer by douglasq · · Score: 1

    I have a really nice stereo. That doesn't stop me from drooling at the local Bang & Olufsen dealer. Why? Because I can appreciate the design. For some people, the Cube has that kind of appeal.

    --
    "Form should follow function...unless it's just plain ugly."
  19. Apple can't do jack about it by HyperMac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All these guys are doing is taking an existing Cube, upgrading it with Sonnet and/or PowerLogix upgrades, which can be purchased by anyone already, and selling the pre-upgraded unit to anyone who wants to save themselves the effort of upgrading it themselves.

    I own a few Cubes, all of which are upgraded with CPUs from PowerLogix and Sonnet, ranging from 800Mhz to 1.2Ghz. One has an internal SuperDrive from MCE. One has a Combo Drive from MCE. The other is a stock DVD-ROM. They all have upgraded video cards (GeForce 2MX, GeForce 3 and ATI Radeon 7500 for dual display). They all have 120GB Seagate HDDs.

    Point is, I could sell any one of them at any time (and have sold quite a few in the past), with all these upgrades already installed, much like Kemplar is doing. They're selling existing parts and labor, that's all.

    All that aside, taking a look at cubeowner.com, I'd say those aluminum after-market 10x10 Cube replacement enclosures are a much hotter ticket. Looks like it will enable me to put a Dual 1.2 (or better!) in there without a fan! Now that's the Cube I've been waiting for! There's no mention of who is making them, but the pictures of the alleged prototype look pretty cool. I'm not a huge fan of the dark metal shown in the picture, but a clear plastic one or a snow-white one (ala iMac G4) would rock my world, for sure.

  20. What are "Spekaers"? by beetle496 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously though, the cube (with ADC monitor) has exactly ONE less cable than the new iMac. Claiming that the iMac eliminates cable clutter is a lie. I hope that Apple releases a G5 cube. IMHO the only thing bad about the cube was how the USB speakers slowed the processor. The only thing that prevented it from being a roaring success was the a price point that was a mere $200 too much.

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  21. Cube sales statistics by rfovell · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the FAQ at cubeowner.com. Click on "Miscellaneous FAQs and Figures".

    They [Apple] sold a total of 148,000 Cubes during the entire lifetime of Cube.

    It sold 12,000 units in the quarter ended in March, 2001.

    The Cube was introduced at a price of $1,799 in July 2000; the price was cut to $1,499 in January 2001.


    I got my Cube (original version) for $899 when the CD-RW equipped appeared to displace it. If Apple could have hit that price point profitably, they would have sold a whole lot more. Despite its limitations, it is a very nice machine (and still my main home computer).

    --
    Every rule has an exception (except this one).
  22. What?!? by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

    A similarly eqipped G4 is $1299. The low-end G5 is only running $1999. I admire the company for reviving what I've always considered to be a sweet CPU enclosure, but c'mon ... that's a bit pricey!

  23. Home media center? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget the 1990s speed - it's a home media center candidate. Existing choices in this market segment are ugly, noisy PCs. A silent beautiful Cube on the other hand...

    1. Re:Home media center? by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

      Too bad there's no good software for that on the mac. Not to mention hardware. Try getting an HDTV tuner for a mac!

  24. Not comparable to what Apple is currently selling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh do some homeowrk before make false statements. You can get a dual 1.25 now for $1599.00 that will blow the doors off an upgraded cube. You would have to REALLY like cubes to pay this kind of money for one.

  25. Heat by scout.finch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I imagine that the cubes were very carefully designed to remove a certain amount of heat, and all this new hotter stuff may cause serious problems?

    1. Re:Heat by powerline22 · · Score: 1

      The kit comes with a fan that is supposed to be very quiet, but i don't know the exact dB.

    2. Re:Heat by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      They surely included fans. If I remember correctly, the original cube had 0 fans (a pretty cool thing, IMHO) but it only had a 400 MHz or so G4. I'm sure they must have added at least a few to make the cube this powerful.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  26. 1 fan by HyperMac · · Score: 1

    The original Cube had 0 fans. An upgraded Cube has one fan. It's a Panaflo - 12db-21db, depending on the upgrade.

  27. CUBE Upgrades are useless .. here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love my old cube. Its a cute little bugger, but one problem .. its fucking slow as shit.

    I wish people would just get up to date on this stuff.

    I agree that having an upgrade processor is neat, and having a crap load of ram is really cool, too, but lets get real.

    The bus speed on the PCI chip is slow. Dog slow. If you get the upgrade to 7200, you see moderate upgrades, but then you are still stuck with under 66 on the bus w/o burst from the UDMA stuff.

    Secondly, check out the AGP clock. Last time I checked it was still 2x. What's the use of having a 4x AGP card, if you can't go UP to 4x!!

    Thirdly ... SDRAM. PLEASE tell someone that there is NO DDR?? See, using SD at 8n/s is neat.. but try DDR. TWICE as fast!

    So all in all.. its nice to have the upgrades, but its like using a Cyrix next to an Intel. They just don't compare. Get OUT of the cube world, and move on. Buy a G5 or something.

    The Cubes are novilties now, and DEFINTELY not worth the price tag that these fools are putting on the mods.