Slashdot Mirror


Hyperion Rover, 1 km On One Command

An anonymous reader writes "Carnegie Mellon's next generation robot just finished its Chilean expedition and achieved a new planetary exploration benchmark, including being the first autonomous rover to cover 1 km on a single command. The other milestones from the Atacama Desert, Chile--the driest place on the planet--centered on over-the-horizon stereo navigation, sun-tracking for efficient solar panel pointing, and fault recovery. CMU shows pictures of the robot, called Hyperion, in action. One of its prime objectives was to plot courses that avoid shade, by finding the position of virtually everything in the solar system."

206 comments

  1. It has to What Now? by Jonsey · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of it's primary goals is to avoid shady paths by knowing the location of everything in the solar system?

    I mean, I've heard of over-engineered. But really folks? : ) That's Scalability.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
    1. Re:It has to What Now? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It also has to solve a rubix cube by drinking all the tea in China.

      I'm sure the article makes sense, though. It's just slashdot postings that read like fourth grade book reports.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:It has to What Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure that little man-made contraption can travel, but can he ever beat this guy?

    3. Re:It has to What Now? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      After looking at the pictures, the avoiding-shadows-part doesn't seem that impressive any more.. :)

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:It has to What Now? by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yup, the same statement struck me as rather absurd too. No only would the stuff you track be meaningless, but say, for example you were the little robot that could exploring Mars and you calculated that Earth was about to eclipse the sun (not that it could be much of an eclipse from Mars' view, but you must be tracking these things for some reason). What the heck can the rover do? It's not like it's going to move to avoid the eclipse!

      And yes, I read the link, it says nothing about this. Perhaps submissions by anonymous deserve a little more editing.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    5. Re:It has to What Now? by jim3e8 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article says that the rover is equipped with software that knows the position of everything in the solar system. But it doesn't check them all against each other. It simply means that, given any planet, it will know the position of that planet and the sun, and can therefore find the sun's position in the sky. They did this so it can be sent to any planet, not limited to just one.

      The submitter was a little overzealous in assuming it checks the position of everything in the solar system for overlap.

    6. Re:It has to What Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A! Talking! Horse!" -- "He's Ed, Jim."

      MAREZ?!?!?! *droool* 8-b___ _ _ _ _ _ _

    7. Re:It has to What Now? by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It could go into a power saving mode until the eclipse has passed. If power isn't being generated after the eclipse has passed, it then could begin trying to figure what the heck happened. It can be used for any number of intelligent diagnostic and power saving modes. Also, if it knows all valid times that its cells should be getting power, it can figure out if it navigated into shade or if it's one of the other known events. If it's a known event, it may be able to wait it out. If it's an unknown event, it can attempt to backtrack and report a possible problem.

      Remember, just because it tracks various bodies, doesn't have to mean that it does so in real time.

    8. Re:It has to What Now? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Uh, it could go into power-saving mode whenever the solar panels go dark.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    9. Re:It has to What Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had my hopes up! If it really DID know the position of everything in the solar system, we could just ask it to tell us where any asteroids are that might collide with the earth!

    10. Re:It has to What Now? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      So, in the event that the thing drives itself under a tree, or a Martian holding an umbrella, it should shut down and sit there until the tree falls down or the Martian moves? (I know that there aren't trees on Mars. Or in the Atacama, for that matter. Hush.)

      A much better solution is for the rover to have an idea of when it's likely to go dark without being able to do anything about it.

    11. Re:It has to What Now? by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      So, in the event that the thing drives itself under a tree, or a Martian holding an umbrella, it should shut down and sit there until the tree falls down or the Martian moves?
      Yes, yes, that is exactly what I had in mind because I'm a total idiot.
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    12. Re:It has to What Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did this so it can be sent to any planet, not limited to just one.

      How many planets would a wheeled rover be useful on? It seems to me that only Earth and Mars are possible candidates.

      Moons and asteroids are a different story, although you'll need some power source other than solar power on most of them.

    13. Re:It has to What Now? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Sure it could. And if it drove it self into a perpetual shadow, it will be sitting there, worthless, for a very long time.

      Did you completely read my post?

    14. Re:It has to What Now? by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      I guess I didn't realize that "power-saving mode" meant "shutting down and doing nothing". I thought you just meant the more power-hungry operations would be postponed.

      Regardless, there is no astronomical body that casts an appreciable shadow on Mars. (Do you remember the last transit of Venus? I didn't think so.) Even Mars' two moons are too small to make a dent in the sun. So your concept, while interesting, is still not useful in this particular case.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    15. Re:It has to What Now? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I guess I didn't realize that "power-saving mode" meant "shutting down and doing nothing". I thought you just meant the more power-hungry operations would be postponed.

      Moving is probably one of the most power hungry activities that it can do.

    16. Re:It has to What Now? by CharlesClarkson · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the little robot that could might nudge the little flashlight that could just before the eclipse.

      --

      Charles K. Clarkson
      Many people truly want to help. Unfortunately, many people truly suck at it.
  2. That's impressive by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It all depends, however, on whether it really was on purpose....

    --
    ...
    1. Re:That's impressive by in7ane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's true, from the photos it looks like it just rolled along a pretty much flat field.

      The setup simply looks too flimsy (assembled out of two bikes?) to go over any significant obstacles.

      I do not doubt that the tracking system, etc. are impressive - they've just got to hook them onto a decent base and send it across a more challenging landscape. On the other hand that will seem like a military application then :)

    2. Re:That's impressive by Transient0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It also depends on whether it can do it across all different kinds of terrain and with some level of reliability.

      I built an autonomous rover out of a Tonka dumptruck once. It could also travel a kilometer on one command. The command just happened to be the ignition switch to the rocket I had strapped to it.

    3. Re:That's impressive by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      yes. It was. Its command was "go ahead forward". So it covered 1km of flat desert land till it crashed on the very first cactus that appeared and got stuck.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    4. Re:That's impressive by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean like those Acme super duper rockets ?

      Willy Coyote would sure like to get his hands on your rover.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    5. Re:That's impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      replace "acme" with "estes" ad replace "super duper" with "E15-6" and you've got a nice little over-the-counter rocket engine :)

      I tried this too when I was a kid, little toy car and an estes C5-3. It spun in circles......

    6. Re:That's impressive by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      See: "grit trucks"

      (Also look at the linked page with the BB gatling gun).

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:That's impressive by cybermace5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The article did say the researchers "tagged along" taking measurements. I guess you could get creative with your interpretation of "chase."

      --
      ...
    8. Re:That's impressive by David+Ishee · · Score: 2, Informative

      From my reading of the site, it seems that this robot was built specifically for the environment that it was in. They were mainly interested in testing subsystems and gaining experience.

      In this context, there were no great terrain obstacles.

      --
      Your password has expired, please login to change it.
    9. Re:That's impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      it crashed on the very first cactus that appeared

      Excellent! A cactus-finding robot!

  3. Go CMU! by mfivis · · Score: 0

    Excellent stuff Asian people, excellent stuff.

    No honestly, this new state of efficiency is kind of neccessary for future rovers- although I think two were recently just launched, so it will be awhile for these proven methods to make it there.

    Usually man power is wasted alligning panels for optimal power and this is just Real Ultimate Power.

  4. Everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...by finding the position of virtually everything in the solar system."

    Even...Uranus?

    1. Re:Everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even...Uranus?

      Stack overflow at 0xFFFFFFF.
      Taking a core dump.

    2. Re:Everything? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...by finding the position of virtually everything in the solar system."

      "Even...Uranus?"

      Don't worry, it is programmed to avoid shade so it won't go where the Sun doesn't shine.

      Now if it could find the position of my keys in the morning that would be nice (I'm almost certain that they are in the solar system so it shouldn't be a problem).

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    3. Re:Everything? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > "Even...Uranus?"
      >
      > Don't worry, it is programmed to avoid shade so it won't go where the Sun doesn't shine.

      "And how does this help me?"
      - The Goatse Guy.

    4. Re:Everything? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      > > > "Even...Uranus?"

      > > Don't worry, it is programmed to avoid shade so it won't go where the Sun doesn't shine.

      > "And how does this help me?"
      > - The Goatse Guy.

      It helps you because the sun shines there for you.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  5. Stop mixing apples and oranges! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny



    Hyperion Rover, 1 km On One Command

    Posted by Hemos on Monday July 28, @10:56AM
    from the planning-ahead dept.
    An anonymous reader writes "Carnegie Mellon's next generation robot just finished its Chilean expedition and achieved a new planetary exploration benchmark, including being the first autonomous rover to cover 1 km on a single command. The other milestones from the Atacama Desert, Chile--the driest place on the planet--centered on over-the-horizon stereo navigation, sun-tracking for efficient solar panel pointing, and fault recovery. CMU shows pictures of the robot, called Hyperion, in action. One of its prime objectives was to plot courses that avoid shade, by finding the position of virtually everything in the solar system."

    Shouldn't that be kilometerstones?

    1. Re:Stop mixing apples and oranges! by pablo.cl · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't that be kilometerstones?
      You mean landmarks.
  6. Sun Guided by FluffyG · · Score: 0, Troll

    If it were guided by the sun then if it landed on a certain portion of a planet or moon then it would go in circles because think of earth. The sun rises on one side and sets on the other, day after day it would go back and forth and not cover much ground. I do understand that it can be switched on and off but it just seems a little odd to me how that can be used for directional purposes.

    1. Re:Sun Guided by JJ22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that would have to be referring to the ability to detect *locally* where the best place is to stop as sundown approaches (such as not going into a valley if the sun will go down before it can get to the other side, or stopping on a hilltop to catch the earliest rays in the morning).

  7. Easy to beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Park a boat off of someplace deep. Have your AIBO walk the plank. Depending on where you try this, you should be able to get much more than 1km on a single command.

    1. Re:Easy to beat by brakk · · Score: 1

      I've got a "robot" that can go 1km on its own in the desert. It's called CRUSE CONTROL! It came with my car. I push it and the car just takes off on it's own! I imagine it could make it 1km in the freakin middle of the desert before it hit something/ran out of gas.

    2. Re:Easy to beat by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I imagine it could make it 1km in the freakin middle of the desert before it hit something/ran out of gas.

      Another car on cruise control, duh!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Yes, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can it find a decent pan-galactic gargle blaster?

    1. Re:Yes, but.. by superid · · Score: 1

      Here he is

      But he's only a crappy level 23 wizard.

    2. Re:Yes, but.. by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Earth is too back-water a planet to be able to find one in the solar system so due the the unfortunate limitations of this robot it seems unlikely. Can't people have a bit of foresight when they construct things nowadays?

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  9. Not impressed... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 2, Funny
    Pssh, we've had automated rover technology since, what, 1979?

    This 'new' model doesn't even have a "Photon" Cannon!

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  10. Not the driest place on Earth by haz-mat · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is a widely held misconception that the Atacam desert in Chile is the driest place on Earth, in fact the driest place on Earth is in the center of Antartica where there has been no percipitation in over 10,000 years.

    1. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by YomikoReadman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Antarctica is only the driest place on Earth if you go by annual rainfall. The Atacam desert is the driest place on earth counting humidity. Besides, Last time i checked, Antarctica was covered in snow, which if I'm not mistaken is ice, which I'm quite sure is nothing more than frozen water.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    2. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by mfivis · · Score: 0

      Man, this is a private and presitigious educational institute. There isn't money lying around for that

    3. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by tgd · · Score: 1

      I can find far more well qualified statements with far more substantiation than yours that says otherwise.

      Evidence? It doesn't take long to find support both ways, but the numbers seem to fall on the side of Chile, because percipitation DOES happen in the central regions of Antartica, but its always frozen, and always blown away before it can be measured.

      I'm not sure I'd agree that is the same as "no percipitation".

    4. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The driest place in Earth is its core, though I've never been there to check.

      Any questions ?

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    5. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
      It is a widely held misconception that the Atacam desert in Chile is the driest place on Earth, in fact the driest place on Earth is in the center of Antartica where there has been no percipitation in over 10,000 years.

      It is a narrowly held misconception that ice is dry.

      (Apologies for the cheap laugh. Cool trivia tidbit, that...)

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    6. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by haz-mat · · Score: 1

      The statement i made was regarding percipitation, regardless of what is on the ground, central Antartica has been without rainfall longer than the Atacama Desert, hence it is the driest place on earth by my statement.

    7. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by haz-mat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Evidence for those who disbelieve:
      One interior region of the Antarctic is known as The Dry Valleys. These valleys have not seen rainfall in over two million years. With the exception of one valley, whose lakes are briefly filled with water by inland flowing rivers during the summer, the Dry Valleys contain no moisture (water, ice, or snow).
      Please see the following as well:
      http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~owen/MD2001/ANTAR CTIC/UM Handout.Info.html

    8. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by SoTuA · · Score: 1

      hmmm... I don't know. Do you have any numbers on precipitation in the center of the pacific ocean? I don't recall seeing any rain there either. But seriously... no precipitation for 10,000 years? It's a) nice to know somebody's been keeping track *that long* and b) it's kinda weird to see a place made mostly of *ice* and covered with *snow* running for "dry". :)

      And on a side note, the Atacama desert is beautiful when it rains. Lots of really hardy seeds live in the desert, and when it rains the desert blooms with all these pretty flowers... quite a sight. (google for "desierto florido").

    9. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snow is frozen water. Ice is dry. It's only when it melts it becomes wet.

    10. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by brakk · · Score: 1

      And the driest person on earth is Steven Wright.

    11. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by haz-mat · · Score: 1

      see above:
      One interior region of the Antarctic is known as The Dry Valleys. These valleys have not seen rainfall in over two million years. With the exception of one valley, whose lakes are briefly filled with water by inland flowing rivers during the summer, the Dry Valleys contain no moisture (water, ice, or snow).
      And even if there was snow and ice you can take ice cores and use radiation dating techniques similiar to Radio-Carbon dating to date the snowfall/ice etc. This technique is used extensively for exbiditions in Greenland.

    12. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      That link was very interesting. I read the whole thing and thoroughly enjoyed it.
      Here's a clickable link.

    13. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The Dry Valleys are from north to south Victoria, Wright and Taylor, and they are unusual in as much as no rain has fallen there for at least two million years. They have no ice or snow either because the air is too dry for any to exist (ice-free spaces in the Antarctic are called oases). They are enormous, desolate places covering around 3000 sq km (1170 sq mi) and were first happened upon by Robert Scott in December 1903. He wrote '...we have seen no living thing, not even a moss or a lichen...it certainly is the valley of the dead; even the great glacier that once pushed through it has withered away'."

      From the Lonely Planet guide (for those who want to holiday there).

      --
      Suck figs.
    14. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by HaloZero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > The driest place on Earth is it's core...

      That's a fundamental paradox, as the Earth's core can not necessarily be ON itself (or it's crust). The driest place IN Earth, is, therefore, it's core.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    15. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Cyno · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you sure its not frozen Carbon Dioxide?

      Maybe its a secret Iraqi base holding all the WMD.

      GOD BLESS YOU!!!

    16. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...ice is dry. Only liquids can wet.

    17. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by pablo.cl · · Score: 1
      but the numbers seem to fall on the side of Chile, because percipitation DOES happen in the central regions of Antartica
      Anyway, we claim a portion of Antarctica, so the numbers are really on Chile's side :-)
    18. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by pablo.cl · · Score: 1

      I've just read about the Dry Valleys. They are far away from the part of Antarctica claimed by Chile.

    19. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      Gee, but I did say "in Earth" but you quoted me wrong.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    20. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so all you're saying is that it hasn't seen rainfall. Last time I checked, it is impossible for rain to fall when the year-round average temperature is below the freezing point of rain. All this really shows me is that you are quite possible alot dumber than I originally thought you were. Even if rain doesn't fall there, it still has a rather large annual snowfall, which is precipitation, and oddly enough, snow is ice, which is frozen water.

    21. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Bernie+Fsckinner · · Score: 0

      Yes, but all Saddam's base are belong to USA!

    22. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if rain doesn't fall there, it still has a rather large annual snowfall, which is precipitation, and oddly enough, snow is ice, which is frozen water.

      Do not stop after two sentences, read the whole post. It was short.

      With the exception of one valley, whose lakes are briefly filled with water by inland flowing rivers during the summer, the Dry Valleys contain no moisture (water, ice, or snow).

    23. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by ndinsil · · Score: 1

      That's kind of an exaggeration. I spent a season in Taylor valley, during that summer it snowed three times. It was an unmeasurable trace each time which quickly blew/sublimated away. However, there are constantly-shifting patches of accumulated snow on the mostly-dry ground. Some ice is present as glacial tongues poke through passes in the mountains that guard the valley, and covering the various lakes along the valley floor. Those lakes gradually sublimate/erode, but are refilled by glacial meltwater every summer. The surfaces of those lakes are covered year-round by 5-6 meters of ice but underneath that the lakes have been liquid for thousands of years. And there was one noticeable animal while I was there, an Adelie penguin that had gotten lost in the valley and couldn't find its way out. It's now joined the other mummified carcasses of trapped penguins and seals that lie about the valley.

    24. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "The Atacam desert is the driest place on earth counting humidity."

      Humidity? In Antarctica? It's kinda hard to keep water in any phase more energetic than solid when you're dealing with tempuratures beyond -40.

    25. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by SoTuA · · Score: 1

      I guess that settles the "dry" bit :)

    26. Re:Not the driest place on Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What a useless article, especially this:
      Like penguins, seals cannot fly
  11. cool ! by jacquesm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is really cool... but other than that the general state of robotics is more and more hampered by legalities, such as liability insurance for the 'owner/operator' of any kind of robot.

    It's funny how if you look back at the turn of the century there was no legal barrier to try out new technological stuff, but just try to imagine the then inventors of automobiles selling their first rickety inventions in todays unbelievably hostile legal climate. The whole technological and transportation revolution would simply not have happened

    That's why we see robots for use on other planets, but we'll probably not see them on this one (unless of course we ship all the lawyers to some other planet first).

    1. Re:cool ! by Psiren · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why we see robots for use on other planets, but we'll probably not see them on this one (unless of course we ship all the lawyers to some other planet first).

      Does is have to be a planet, or can we aim it at any stellar body?

    2. Re:cool ! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      as long as it is outside of the range of fax/telephone machines I think we'd be safe, so almost any 'heavenly body' would do. Then we can finally get on with this terrible business called innovation.

      Consider this: an American corporation came up with a pretty good idea for a low cost windmill but because they can not get product liability insurance (pretty much a must in todays climate) the product got axed. Makes you weep.

    3. Re:cool ! by puff-d-dwaggie · · Score: 2, Funny

      (unless of course we ship all the lawyers to some other planet first)

      Ok, I dont see this as a major stumbling block, nor do I know of any human beings who would object too much.

      "Get Moose and Squirrel!"

    4. Re:cool ! by ePhil_One · · Score: 0
      It's funny how if you look back at the turn of the century there was no legal barrier to try out new technological stuff, but just try to imagine the then inventors of automobiles selling their first rickety inventions in todays unbelievably hostile legal climate. The whole technological and transportation revolution would simply not have happened

      With modern design tools, such as CAD/CAM and computerized milling machines, there is almost no excuse for building anything rickety or unproven. Some time ago I worked with an old aviation pioneer building a revolutionary transportation device. I did not return for a second internship because what they were doing was starting to scare the shit out of me, I became convinced the project was going to kill some one, and a few years later I was proven right.

      Is it your premise that their negligence in the vehicles construction was acceptable? Will it be ok when Sam the Robot impales little Cindy on a meat hook becaus ethe programs mixed up inches and cm? (or cm and mm?) Or didn't account for O-ring britleness in the meat locker?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    5. Re:cool ! by pizen · · Score: 1

      Is it your premise that their negligence in the vehicles construction was acceptable? Will it be ok when Sam the Robot impales little Cindy on a meat hook becaus ethe programs mixed up inches and cm? (or cm and mm?) Or didn't account for O-ring britleness in the meat locker?

      What the hell is little Cindy doing in a meat locker?

    6. Re:cool ! by jacquesm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no, my premise is that it is no longer possible for smaller companies to bring stuff to market because the first (even failed) lawsuit will probably put them out of business, and because insurance companies will not cover product related liability at a price that will make the product still affordable because of the absolutely ridiculous amounts that are routinely awarded in product liability cases.

      Around the turn of the century people accepted that new technologies and their development incurred a certain amount of risk taking on the part of the public, nowadays we expect to be absolutely safe from the cradle to the grave.

      Lawyers have heavily capitalized on this (especially in the US) with all kinds of bogus lawsuits about product 'failures' (you probably know the various examples as well as I do.)

      This is keeping a whole pile of potentially interesting devices of the market or from being developed at all because the would be developers feel that actually selling their work would expose them to all kinds of harm (especially if they are somewhat successful).

      The 'I'll sue you' attitude is becoming more and more widespread and is having an ever stifling effect on development.

      The only way we are going to go forward is by making mistakes (accidents) and taking risk, not by taking a risk, getting into an accident and then to sue left right and center just to either make a buck or to soothe some inner child that feels wronged.

      Large corporations see the new legal culture as a new form of tax, smaller corporations simply go under (or never even get off the ground).

      It's evident that robotic technology will initially at least lead to all kinds of exposure to risk, especially if we let the devices loose in our urban jungles. But if we do not then we'll never learn what to fix, and the development will be slowed down to the point where you'll be hard put to mark any progress at all since a device will have to be absolutely bullet proofed before it can be sold.

    7. Re:cool ! by Ominous+Coward · · Score: 1

      She was a meatpacker. "Little Cindy" was just a nickname, kinda like "Tiny". She used to be one of the strongest workers on the floor.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    8. Re:cool ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's an idea! We could just put them on the same ship as the phone sanitizers, hairstylists, marketing professional, etc, and be done with it!

    9. Re:cool ! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Not just that. Think about how much current technology might never have made it to market if they were invented today. Things like natural gas in homes, motorcycles, etc. I know insurance companies definitely hate motorcycles, and they'd ban them in a minute if they thought they could.

    10. Re:cool ! by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      While I agree that nuisance lawsuits are out of control (My personal favorite were the Audi's that supposedly had brake failures simultaneously with their gas pedals being fully engaged, but then worked fine five minutes later), the situation is not as bad as you imply. Take the current subject of robots. They are already penetrating our society. There are robotic lawn mowers, floor sweepers, fench fry cookers, dogs, etc. Just because we dont have a prehistoric C3PO wandering about muttering "Kill all humans" doesn't mean threats of lawsuits are keeping killbots from the market. So where might threats of lawsuits be keeping robots from? Well, I'm betting they are slowing down the introduction of robotic drivers. I'm sure you may be happy to accept the risk of your robot car screwing up, but does that mean the folks shopping at Qwikie Mart do? When your 4,000lb killing machine screws up and drives full throttle thru a Quickie Mart, their surviving relatives should just suck it up and say "Its all for technological progress?" When the neighborhood mad scientist amputates you legs because his anti-mosquito laser drew a bit to much power are you gonna smile from your wheelchair and say it was worth it?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    11. Re:cool ! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      What will happen - and I hope I'm wrong about this, but I think I'm not - is that *ANY* accident involving robotic technology will *ALLWAYS* be taken to court simply because it is possible, and because the potential 'win' for the grieved party will be enormous.

      So, we will have a near perfect robotic driver, and yet it will not be marketed simply because the first accident by a 'grieved' party will be able to claim 'it's your robot that did it', and the companies insurance company will be forced to pay through the nose, end of story for robotic drivers.

      Robotic technology is going to be a sitting duck for this kind of lawsuit, since it has one little problem, there is nobody to give evidence for the robot, your word against the robots, who do we believe ? You can do everything you want to make the thing bombproof, it will not help one shred.

      What needs to change is peoples attitude towards accidents, where if something goes wrong it is not immediately seen as a shot at becoming an instant millionaire.

      There are other fields where this habit starts to show its effects, such as medical practice. In spite of all the waivers and so on there are less and less people willing to become doctors. They start out as the most noble people on the planet (those who spend their lives in healing others), they end up as the most cynical ones because every mistake they make opens them up to a malpractice suit. It's sickening.

    12. Re:cool ! by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      Robotic technology is going to be a sitting duck for this kind of lawsuit, since it has one little problem, there is nobody to give evidence for the robot, your word against the robots, who do we believe

      I see it the other way. The robot driver will have a black box, it will say object A was detected traveling at 45mph at a vector that corresponds to the parking lot entrance, I applied max braking force (proven to be 20% more effective than a human could be). The other driver will so no, I came to a complete stop, and started to inch out, when the robot car swerverd into me! (assuming his own cars electronics dont rat him out. Maybe hes driving a classic Chevy Nova).

      Hmm, who does the insurance company believe, the "black box/video tape" or the the "victim of an out of control robot".

      Yeah, the introducer will have to test the hell out of the system, but we've had robotic brakes for ages (ok, the cops sued about these cause they were used to driving on the edge and used the locked tires for emergency manuvers, but I recall they lost), And have in recent years been expanded to "Yaw control/anti-spin" techs. Not to mention robotic throttles have been in place for about three years now and are rapidly taking over.

      I'm betting Cadillac will actually take the lead here, since they've already outfitted some of their vehicles with vision systems (the HUD/Nightvision on the Deville), and GM takes this stuff public with Cadillac first for a number of reasons.

      Personally, I expect the robotic lawnmower to be a bigger liability, just seems a matter of time til someone loses a toe to the thing :)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    13. Re:cool ! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      :) Ok, let's hope for the best !

      I very much want this tech to happen.

      cheers !

      j.

    14. Re:cool ! by Shriek · · Score: 0
      (unless of course we ship all the lawyers to some other planet first)

      Ok, I dont see this as a major stumbling block, nor do I know of any human beings who would object too much.


      Umm, I'm sure the people being shipped would object quite a bit, duh...
    15. Re:cool ! by puff-d-dwaggie · · Score: 1

      but I said Human Beings.....lawyer...hmm..different classification in the Galactic Lifeform Classification handbook.

      "Get Moose and Squirrel!"

  12. Mods already? by aliens · · Score: 1

    Think this thing has some phatty hydrolics?

    http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/atacama/gallery/03Robo t/ 03Robot-Pages/Image2.html

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:Mods already? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's the "type R" model. It has special stickers that make it go faster and intimidate opponents in rover street races.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  13. Impressive. by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    Robotic considerations in addition to instrument integration include platform configuration, planetary-relevant localization, complex obstacle negotiation, over-the-horizon navigation, and power-cognizant activity planning.

    We're looking for a manager at the moment with a lot of those skills.

    But seriously, folks. This is quite cool. Its capabilities at the moment seem to surpass by far those of the mars bots that are currently wending their way through space. Am I missing something, though, or have most of those experiments nothing to do with astrobiology? Not a cavil, just wondering.

    1. Re:Impressive. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is quite cool. Its capabilities at the moment seem to surpass by far those of the mars bots that are currently wending their way through space.

      Much of Mars is a much rockier place than this deseart. I doubt that thing could handle tons of pointy rocks, large and small.

    2. Re:Impressive. by mike_the_kid · · Score: 1

      I think the point was not to build a beefy robot, but to build a system that had the optics and intelligence to guide itself.

      Anybody can put beefy shocks and knobby tires on a robot, but if all the robot can do is go forward until it runs out of juice, well, big whup.

      --
      Troll Like a Champion Today
    3. Re:Impressive. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But you need even smarter image interpretation systems if there are a lot of rocks.

  14. Perfect... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I mean lets face it the smarter robots get the more we advance as a race. If we can understand the minds we program to be able to see the logic or logical answer then we better start to understand ourselves.

    But the problem being it begins to raise questions about the future, if we model a machine after ourselves so much will it be our demise? Science fiction has a way of blowing things out of proportion. When we first started seeing atomic weapons there was a fear we'd destroy the world over and over again, but we haven't yet.

    I think the more we learn to understand ourselves the closer we are to advancing the human race to the next level of existance.

    "Forget about exploring space, we still don't have the slightest clue about our own bodies".

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Perfect... by mfivis · · Score: 1

      "Forget about exploring space, we still don't have the slightest clue about our own bodies". Alright, I think we'll let you hike up to the observatory to tell the astronomers that.

    2. Re:Perfect... by procifer · · Score: 1

      Check out the works of Vernor Vinge (there's some here) He predicts that once we "invent" artificial intelligence, it will be the end of human innovation. Pretty interesting stuff

    3. Re:Perfect... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      When we first started seeing atomic weapons there was a fear we'd destroy the world over and over again, but we haven't yet.

      60-years is hardly a good sampling period. Perhaps you meant they thought that we would almost immediate blow ourselves up. We have come close with 1960's Cuba Missle Crisis and a few others. Perhaps god or little green dudes are watching out for us. After all, if we nuke the planet, they won't have any more humans to probe.

  15. a single command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could be "drive 1km using the following 500000 waypoints: ..."

  16. Avoid Shady Spots? by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1

    After looking at all those pictures, I can certainly see how difficult it would have been for this 'bot to avoid shade. Sheesh.

  17. wow by Biomechanoid · · Score: 1

    >>CMU shows pictures of the robot, called Hyperion, in action.

    Colin McRae eat your heart out.

  18. Position tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually tracking the position of the sun, moons and the planet it's on and it's own position on the planet (or moon) can be very usefull. If that data is interpreted intelligently, the rover could identify locations that have permanent shade and avoid those. Likewise it could figure out if a location is currently shaded, but won't be in a couple of hours, and decide to venture into that shaded environment. Or it could not go into a location currently under a blistering(sp?) sun knowing that this location will soon be shaded voor several days.

    Knowing the state of the environment and the ability to make predictions in regards to that state are usefull for autonomous machines. (stating the obvious, yes I know)

  19. Stereo navigation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "over-the-horizon stereo navigation"

    That's like when you can hear boy racers in their Escorts before you can see them, right?

    1. Re:Stereo navigation? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Now if only the DOD would get around to putting that kind of technology into their smart bombs. :)

  20. The one command.. by gnalre · · Score: 1

    Left;Forward 2m;Right;Forward 10m;Left;Forward 10m;left;For.......

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
  21. Tommy the Turtle can already do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    FD 1000

  22. plot courses that avoid shade... by Refried+Beans · · Score: 1, Funny

    Must be pretty easy to do that in a wide open desert.

    1. Re:plot courses that avoid shade... by pablo.cl · · Score: 1
      Must be pretty easy to do that in a wide open desert.
      But it has a lot of mountains.
  23. Why Chile? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Why did they have to go all the way to Chile to test this? Couldn't they do it in Death Valley? I just wonder if they really needed to go there or if they just wanted an excuse to go to the driest place on earth?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Why Chile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mom!!! Can I pleeease go? But, it is the driest place on earth, mom!

    2. Re:Why Chile? by brakk · · Score: 1

      I want to know who was funding their "research" and how they talked them into paying for shipping and travel expenses for everyone that went. Why the hell would they need to go all that way just to find a km of flat land?

    3. Re:Why Chile? by le_jfs · · Score: 1

      Going to the driest place on earth is a sure good excuse to get a refreshing beer.

      --
      main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
    4. Re:Why Chile? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just wonder if they really needed to go there or if they just wanted an excuse to go to the driest place on earth?

      Then why didn't they just go to Utah?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:Why Chile? by pablo.cl · · Score: 1

      Maybe they wanted to go to the beach at night after those hot days at the desert.

  24. Scary next-gen by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 4, Funny
    The successor of the 'Hyperion', naturally, will be 'The Shrike':

    Shrike Rover, 1k Slaughtered On One Command

  25. Yes, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it find my remote control?

  26. new breakthrough? by tantrum · · Score: 1

    I don't quite understand all the fuss about beeing able to drive for a km without anyone to drive it. Automatic farm equipment is already in existance, and I think it is way harder to run a tractor in a wet, muddy field than drivin this bot on a relatively flat and dry surface.

    The developers probably have fun, though :)

    My lego mindstorms have been running around in my appartment for a while now, and I haven't given it an instruction for weeks (besides changing batteries and turning it on)

    1. Re:new breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does your mindstorm do?

    2. Re:new breakthrough? by tantrum · · Score: 1

      it actually tries to draw a map of my room..
      It havent quite managed, though.

      And it tries to use the rooms light level to double check. Not sure what it does when the lights go out :)

  27. Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A while back there was a story on Slashdot about a $1M prize to the first group who could design a robot to autonomously travel from LA to Las Vegas... From the sounds of it, this might be a good candidate for the challenge!

    1. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by jea6 · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, that LA to LV is about 400x the distance that this rover covered. Certainly it may be a start, just not much of a start.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    2. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by rev_sanchez · · Score: 1

      I think Hunter S. Tompson's corvette already did that one. I doubt either he or his lawyer gave any helpful commands to the car outside the city limits of LA.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    3. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by RainbowSix · · Score: 2, Informative

      CMU is one step ahead of you. There is already a seperate project devoted to the challenge in question.

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    4. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Your link doesn't appear to work -- could you please resubmit it?

    5. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Try this link to the home page. Unfortunately, many of the links are broken -- perhaps they're reworking the page.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Plus, the DARPA winner must average something like 55mph IIRC. Hyperion does not look like it could even fall downward off a cliff at 55mph.

    7. Re:Is it up to the DARPA challenge? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      From L.A. ? On itself ?

      Once the bad guys knew the price of the prototype, and knew it was on its own, itd be stolen.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  28. Only thing I could think of... by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    was that it was trying to avid solar occlusions by other planets and moons!

    "Response from Hyperion: Cannot execute command, busy navigating 4000km to east to avoid total solar eclipse in 2004".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Only thing I could think of... by le_jfs · · Score: 2, Funny

      The though I had was the rover busy running at 900mph in attempt to avoid the night.

      Scary...

      --
      main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
    2. Re:Only thing I could think of... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Response from Hyperion: Cannot execute command, busy navigating 4000km to east to avoid total solar eclipse in 2004"

      Trying to calculate why the human wants tea...

  29. The command... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was "GOTO 1km that way" :)

  30. I can do that with by Big Track by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Fwd 1000 Go

    For a little flare, have it fire once halfway there.

    And I don't even need to avoid shadows!

    Of course, I am limited to I-70 in Kansas and the thing keeps getting squashed by semi-trucks. That's the only reason they beat me to the record.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  31. Get One For Yourself! by notcreative · · Score: 5, Funny
    Many of you read the article and wondered how you could get one of these to play with. I figured out a quick "do-it-yourself" solution....
    • Fly to Chile
    • Go to the Atacama desert
    • Hide behind a dune (bring water)
    • Wait for rover to trundle by
    • Take the rover and run
    • Possession is .9 of the law
    I call this the "Sandpeople Technique."
    1. Re:Get One For Yourself! by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1
      And I figured out a quick "get rich" solution...

      1- Fly to Chile

      2- Go to the Atacama desert

      3- Hide behind a dune

      4- Wait for rover to trundle by

      5- Steal rover

      6- ?????????

      7- PROFIT !!!

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  32. Love the fact that they linked to a definition of by gardyloo · · Score: 1
  33. Straightening things out... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Atacama Desert, Chile--the driest place on the planet

    Dry Valleys, Antarctica, probably beat it by several hundreds of thousands years without any kind of water. (be it snow, ground water or air humidity)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  34. Judging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by those pictures it sure does look like a daunting task accross that COMPLETELY FLAT, DESOLATE TERRAIN UNLIKE MARS IN AN WAY

    they're using bicycle tires geez

  35. My processor can do that too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOV A EA 03

  36. I tried this by Niadh · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried this but it kept running away from my shadow. Then it miss-took my head for the moon and turned south.

    1. Re:I tried this by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Then it miss-took my head for the moon and turned south.

      South? as in "down there"? Ouch! That is why they call it a probe I guess.

  37. 2004 models are already out by lateralus · · Score: 1

    *Only does 0.4km per command in urban areas. Your mileage may vary.

    --
    If you outlaw the law, only criminals will have laws
  38. Stereo navigation? by four12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "over-the-horizon stereo navigation"? I can do this any time I want... just listen for my daughter's stereo and I can tell where home is from miles away.

  39. SPICE by Papatoast · · Score: 0

    Ha! I knew it...I wonder if Sting is involved. Maybe Kyle MacLachlan...He's not been up to much lately...

    The SPICE acronym comes from:
    S - Spacecraft
    P - Planet
    I - Instrument
    C - "C-matrix"
    E - Events

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
  40. Obviously, it's another AI failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any _HUMAN_ would try to MAXIMIZE his use of shade in trying to find a path!

  41. That's nothing! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I've got a $5M prize for anyone to build a robot that can track down and destroy those other robots before the cross the finish line!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:That's nothing! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've got a $5M prize for anyone to build a robot that can track down and destroy those other robots before the cross the finish line!

      Who ever said video games didn't affect American youth.

  42. Somewhere in that thought... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    is a readlly bad SciFi movie just waiting to be created. "Dayrunners", you could call it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Somewhere in that thought... by radish · · Score: 1

      Or how about Pitch Black? ;)

      Actually not such a bad film...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  43. That's so NASA by Animats · · Score: 1
    That's so NASA. NASA would issue a press release claiming they invented the wheel if they thought they could get away with it.

    Autonomous ground vehicles have traversed more than a kilometer on a single command before. Several of CMU's Navlab vehicles have done that. The military "Demo III" robot vehicles have done that. In rougher terrain, too.

    Hyperion is a neat little machine, but it's not that exotic. It doesn't do "over the horizon stereo navigation". Its stereo system has a useful range of about seven meters. They do much of their path planning based on aerial photography, but that's not on the robot itself. The novel feature of Hyperion is that it operates over considerable distances on very low power, using solar power. Previous solar powered rovers have been short-range devices.

    1. Re:That's so NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA don't claim to have invented the wheel, but they did redesign it.

      Its now square, for easy packing.

  44. DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Team Overbot is developing an autonomous robot vehicle for entry in the DARPA Grand Challenge. 200 miles through the desert in 10 hours - no driver. $1,000,000 prize.

    We have to do a lot better than Hyperion did. 300km, not one. And faster.

    We're looking for a few good people. Hard work, no pay, some risk, a chance for a fraction of the prize. See our current openings.

    We're in Silicon Valley. We have funding, a shop in an industrial park in Redwood City, a vehicle under construction, and six people. We need about six more.

    1. Re:DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      re: Overbot / DARPA Grand Challenge:

      Dude, that is the coolest fucking thing I've read today :) You go, guys!

    2. Re:DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I was kicking around the idea of a bit more brute-force approach. It would be a vehicle that is horizontally symmetrical so that it could still move if it flipped over. Four giant wheels and a flat body. Basically it would use GPS and pre-known general knowlege of the terrain to just keep moving on a general virtual path toward the goal. Since we have fore-knowlege of the terrain, we know where to speed up and where to slow down. It could have basic sonar to know where there is a deep cliff or the like that may not be on the maps.

    3. Re:DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      I'd jump in there if it weren't for two minor details: 2,000 miles away and the need to eat.

      --
      ...
    4. Re:DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by RobinH · · Score: 1

      We're looking for a few good people. Hard work, no pay, some risk, a chance for a fraction of the prize. See our current openings.

      From your website:

      "Help build America's Robot Army!"

      So, let's get this straight... you're trying to create a robot that's going to be used in miliary applications to kill people. The army will no longer need to send thinking humans into battle, it can just send these, preprogrammed with specific targets, and a path to get there. It won't need human intervention to fire because it's autonomous. It will fire at whatever is deemed a target or a threat. Some of these will be civilians - some will even be children. But don't worry, no person will live to tell the story. No news crew will travel with the robot, and no troops will return with stories of how horrible war is, and how it should be avoided at all costs.

      To those of you involved in this project, consider this: there are weapons in this world that should not have been invented. Let's take biological weapons for instance. Did the engineers who developed more lethal strains of anthrax make the world a better place? Shouldn't those people have been trying to cure diseases rather than to create better ones?

      This weapon will never be used on U.S. soil. It has no "defence" value - it's only use is for attacking other people. It looks like it will be most effective in open flat areas, like maybe the deserts in the middle east? How do your morals stack up against what you're doing? Where I'm from, an engineer is given the public's trust to make the world safer, not more dangerous. Isn't there something better you should be spending your talents on?

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Funny, isn't it? One million dollars from DARPA to build a high-speed autonomous killing machine. Zero dollars from NASA to build a high-speed autonomous planetary exploration machine.

      Nice to see where US government priorities lie.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    6. Re:DARPA Grand Challenge - Join Team Overbot by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I agree. Sometimes these defence projects try to hide the military side by saying, "build me a robot to explore Mars," but then they put in the rules, "extra points awarded if it can carry a payload, say, about the side of a missile." Ha ha.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  45. Shade Avoidance by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    "One of its prime objectives was to plot courses that avoid shade"

    Um, to my knowledge there isn't a single tree in that desert. How do they know it was successful? I am sure they will claim a 100% success, just as I can claim a 100% success when testing my coffee cup's new "don't move" feature. Yep, it worked. It's right where I left it.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  46. this could revolutionize.. by monkey_jam · · Score: 1

    ...the drug smuggling industry!

    consider this: outfit an old boat with enough fuel for a journey from amsterdam to england, a computer controlled engine/rudder and a GPS system.

    load up with you're preffered narcotic, aim for home and wait a few days.

    i need a boat and £5000!

  47. Not really autonomous? by el_gregorio · · Score: 1

    If it's really so autonomous, then who was there taking the pictures? huh? huh?

    --
    "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
  48. Yes, a great film by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    But the opposite concept. Something that sought light instead and would go about any means to get it!

    I suppose if Pitch Black can be good then "Dayseekers" could be good too (just changed the name to be a little more menacing".

    It wouldn't have to be horror though. It might be fun to have a documentary on the poor "Dayseekers" and the contsant struggle to stay in light.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  49. Here's the command by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

    forward 14.2m && left 23 degrees && forward 29.22m && right 12 degrees && forward 14.2m && left 16 degrees && forward 112m && left 12 degrees && forward 0.89m && left 16 degrees && forward 182m && right 50 degrees && forward 214.2m && left 90 degrees && forward 5m && right 90 degrees && forward 5m && right 90 degrees && forward 5m && left 90 degrees && forward 825m && stop;

  50. Personal Probe by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something like this could find my missing socks while I am at work. Finally, something with direct earthly benefits from NASA. For a little extra maybe it will toss AOL disks and empty pizza containers for ya also.

  51. mission scrapped by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    And in other news; $500 million mission scrapped due to 4 broken spokes costing approxiamately 50 cents each.

    1. Re:mission scrapped by VCAGuy · · Score: 1
      approxiamately 50 cents each.

      50 cents?! HA! Ever heard of the GSA schedule? More like $50,000/ea after contract costs.

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  52. Avoid shade? Hm. by jtheory · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of its prime objectives was to plot courses that avoid shade

    I hope they find it another way to navigate before they send it out to rescue lost hikers in Death Valley, etc..

    - "Oh, thank God you found me, RoboSaviour!"
    - "YES MY SECOND PRIME DIRECTIVE IS TO HELP HUMANKIND. DO NOT FEAR I WILL CARRY YOU TO A HOSPITAL ESTIMATED TIME TO ARRIVAL 62 HOURS"

    - "Wait, second directive? And, uh, wouldn't it be safer for us to travel at night?"
    - "HERE WE GO, SIR. ESTIMATED ARRIVAL CONDITION: TENDER, EXTRA-CRISPY"

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  53. Good... by confused+one · · Score: 1
    One more step in the process...

    Soon enough, we will be bowing to the robot overlords! BOW BEFORE YOUR MASTER!

  54. Johnny 1? by celerityfm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is is just me, or does this thing bear a strong resemblance to our good friend Johnny 5 from the movie Short Circuit?

    Now I understand why such a thing would go as to track "the position of virtually everything in the solar system," input Stephanie!

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  55. The concept has been thought out by default+luser · · Score: 1

    In Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars series, other planets in the solar system are settled after Mars and the Moon.

    A single city is built on the surface of Mercury, and is mounted on rails that encircle the entire planet. The sheer force of the thermal expansion of the rails is enough to keep the city perpetually moving away from the light side.

    And no, you DON'T want to be on the lit side of Mercury.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:The concept has been thought out by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      A single city is built on the surface of Mercury, and is mounted on rails that encircle the entire planet. The sheer force of the thermal expansion of the rails is enough to keep the city perpetually moving away from the light side.

      And no, you DON'T want to be on the lit side of Mercury.


      Neither would those rails, I'd imagine. Did the city reform the rails in front of it from the melted slag of the previous day?

    2. Re:The concept has been thought out by Grab · · Score: 1

      Don't think that was the Mars series, it was in a short story collection (whose name eludes me) by KSR. The city is called Terminator (which probably dates the story to pre-Arnie ;-)

      Grab.

    3. Re:The concept has been thought out by default+luser · · Score: 1

      It may have been a concept originally created in a short-story, but actually, it IS in Blue Mars.

      It starts at Part 11: Viriditas. I have the paperback edition, and it starts on page 487.

      Zo sat at the back of a room full of diplomats, looking out the window at Terminator as the oval city rolled majestically over the blasted wastelands of Mercury...

      If it WAS a concept borrowed from an earlier short story, it's wonderfully integrated into the whole spread of the Martian concept across all voids.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  56. astronomers renamed Uranus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry: Pine needles. Oh man, this is great! Hey as long as you don't make me smell Uranus!

    [He laughs.]

    Leela: I don't get it.

    Farnsworth: I'm sorry Fry but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.

    Fry: Oh. What's it called now?

    Farnsworth: Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you.

    [Fry chuckles.]

  57. Casemods already?!? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    That product just came out and already they're adding ground effects.

    http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/atacama/gallery/03Robo t/ 03Robot-Pages/Image2.html

  58. Rough on the old electronics by RemiT · · Score: 1

    Great shots of robot showing insides. Pretty sparse!

    Speaking of sparse, few signs of any shock absorbers....

    Hope the depth perception and navigation rules are taut.

  59. When I did that... by RobK · · Score: 1

    I found out my driveway was only about 25 meters long. It was hard to explain to the neighbors why a hissing, flaming dumptruck was hiding under their shrubs.

  60. i wonder by dopeghost · · Score: 1


    if its is the driest place on the planet - why does it look like its been raining ?

    --
    This UID is 7651 digits too high to subjectively infer IQ from.
  61. The ONE command: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "get lost!"

  62. Speaking of the dangers of robotic cars... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    let's not forget that we had TWO incidents of elderly men plowing into vegtable markets THIS WEEK! (Wassup wid dat?)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  63. Which book? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I read the whole Mars series, and don't remember that at all... I seem to remember some otehr story about that, but can't remember the author.

    However, I was talking about entities that were focused on seeking out light by any means. It's pretty diffrent than just putting something on a track so it will stay in the light and has no ability to really go anywhere. The independance is the exciting bit (to me).

    Plus of course they have yet to make a movie from the fine Mars books.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  64. How does it steer? by Habberhead · · Score: 1

    Looking at the photos linked from above, I can't see any method of it rotating either the front or rear wheels for steering.

    Image 6 shows what appears to be a linkage underneath the front axle in the center, but looking at the higher angle photos, it simply looks like a rigid bracket. If in fact that entire axle is pivoting around that point, it sure seems like a weak point.

    Of course, it doesn't look like the frame in general is all that stout. Maybe I'm wrong.

    And what the heck is that neon photo all about? I kept looking for the oversize exhaust to go with it, but with the solar cells, I guess it would have been even more ridiculous on this than it is on an Escort.

  65. Did anyone else... by spoco2 · · Score: 1
    ...think that this thing was only a little bigger than a remote control car until they saw this photo?

    Man, that's way bigger than I thought it was... amazing what your brain can do when it has no near objects to compare something to.

  66. Grand Theft Rover by quinkin · · Score: 1
    I can't wait for one of these to be "kidnapped" (preferably with telemetry intact to allow easy retrieval and a good laugh all round) while wandering about in some desert or another.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here