Slashdot Mirror


Close Encounters Of The Mars Kind

Lab_rat0 writes "Never again in our lifetimes will the Red Planet be so spectacular! This month and next, Earth is catching up with Mars, an encounter that will culminate in the closest approach between the two planets in recorded history. This article at EliteGeek has more details. According to Agg over at OCAU, this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months."

153 comments

  1. Never again in our lifetimes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Speak for yourself. I plan to live to at least 150,000 years of age. I'm sure I'll see better.

    1. Re:Never again in our lifetimes? by error502 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, since time doesn't exist, you have a shot.

    2. Re:Never again in our lifetimes? by fehlschlag · · Score: 1

      Article: ...Earth is catching up with Mars...
      Post: Well, since time doesn't exist, you have a shot.


      Lol, but doesn't the runner/turtle paradox claim that the Earth will never catch up with Mars?

    3. Re:Never again in our lifetimes? by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention if those of us spent less time on slashdot and more time outside, you would simply have noticed the (comparitively) massive red ball in the sky :)

      Of course I only noticed coz my little brother called me out, but hey - it's cold out!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Never again in our lifetimes? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Not to mention if those of us spent less time on slashdot and more time outside, you would simply have noticed the (comparitively) massive red ball in the sky :)

      That depends on where you live, you insensitive clod! (You can't see it in Europe :-/ )

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  2. Bad Joke Alert by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to Agg over at OCAU, this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months."

    But when are they going to probe Uranus?

    1. Re:Bad Joke Alert by AndyFewt · · Score: 0

      I don't know how electronics would respond to having copious amounts of KY on them ;P

    2. Re:Bad Joke Alert by AndyFewt · · Score: 1

      How did I know that was coming.. I *must* be psychic

    3. Re:Bad Joke Alert by Izago909 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But when are they going to probe Uranus?

      Scientists renamed that planet in the year 2354 to end that old joke once and for all. It's now known as Urectum.

      "Afer all, who needs courage when you have a gun?"
      -Prof Hubert Farnsworth

    4. Re:Bad Joke Alert by Mard · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    5. Re:Bad Joke Alert by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking of Uranus, the bluish planet reaches opposition on August 24 in Aquarius, about 8 west of Mars. It may be possible to see it with the naked eye. Tonight (August 4), Neptune will be in opposition in Copernicus, but probably not visible without a small telescope. The full moon is the 12th, and the Perseid meteor shower peaks on the 13th, with the best viewing time around an hour or two after sunset. Enjoy!

      --
      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
  3. Obligatory Zubrin post... by bc90021 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Mars is so close, it's a shame that more people haven't read "The Case for Mars" (see here, and no, I am not affiliated in any way), as now would be a very good time to put some of the principlesinto practise and land someone on Mars!

    1. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by EverDense · · Score: 5, Funny

      now would be a very good time to put some of the principlesinto practise and land someone on Mars!

      Preferably someone that I don't like.
      Preferably without a space suit.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    2. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by crmartin · · Score: 1
      I've got a little list.

      They never would be missed.

      ... they never would be missed.

    3. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by imipak · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, the case for Mars... I debate it every evening with myself. Usually, I win, and then step out into the back yard for a stretch, a smoke, and a last look at the stars - naturally including Mars, which these days is hovering at the foot of the garden in the twilight. Go out and have a look, you can't miss it - it's the brightest 'star' visible, and distinctly salmon coloured to the naked eye (unless you're colourblind, I guess?)

    4. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...how about the president of the RIAA... or that dude from SCO! Yeah, that's the ticket...

    5. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by GeoSB · · Score: 1

      Preferably someone that I don't like. Preferably without a space suit. I wonder if Lance Bass is still looking for a space trip?

    6. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by harryk · · Score: 1

      Ok...

      so if Mars is so fscking close (2400 miles, someone posted) then why does it take months for a craft to get there. I realize that its not quite a straight shot, but heres the thought.

      I drive from Houston, TX to Appleton, WI and its 1,297 miles. that trip takes rougly 20hrs. Given that I'm only driving 70mph (roughly).

      These spacecraft are travelling much faster than I am, but lets be cynical and say that they travel at 100mph. It should only take 24hrs to complete the entire trip. Lets add in a couple of extra hundred miles for course corrections, and say 3000mi.

      So why does it take months to get a craft over there. How slow are they really moving, and why aren't we taking more advantage of frictionless atmosphere.

      inquiring minds want to know!

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    7. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if the parent is a troll or not but . . . I believe the 2400 mile figure is a reference to how much closer Mars is going to get to Earth than compared to the next closest pass over the past 150,000 years, not the actual distance between Mars and Earth

      I imagine that a distance of a mere 2,400 miles would result in the most intense world surfing championships ever.

    8. Re:Obligatory Zubrin post... by harryk · · Score: 1

      as a look back at my original post, I realize that it was abit absurd, but it was NOT intended to be troll like... harryk

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
  4. Damn it I won't be able to sleep at night now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can see those scary faces all over the surface of Mars. They are watching me .... nooooo....

  5. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case the site (or routes to the site) get slashdotted, here is a mirror to the link.

    1. Re:Mirror by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      Looks more like a link to the mirror...

      -Lucas

    2. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine. I should have said here is a link to a mirror for the link in the article.

      Then again, I maybe I should have said here is a bunch of pixels rendered using some kind of graphics card of letters rendered by bits you downloaded from a comment on slashdot using HTML showing a link to a mirror for the link in the article.

  6. Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Never again in our lifetimes will the Red Planet be so spectacular!
    This month and next, Earth is catching up with Mars, an encounter that
    will culminate in the closest approach between the two planets in
    recorded history.

    The next time Mars may come this close is in 2287.

    Due to the way Jupiter's gravity tugs on Mars and perturbs its
    orbit, astronomers can only be certain that Mars has not come this close to
    Earth in the last 5,000 years but it may be as long as 60,000 years.
    The encounter will culminate on August 27th when Mars comes to within 34,649,589
    miles and will be (next to the moon) the brightest object in the night sky.
    It will attain a magnitude of -2.9 and will appear 25.11 arc seconds wide.
    At a modest 75-power magnification, Mars will look as large as the full moon to
    the naked eye.

    Mars will be easy to spot. At the beginning of August, Mars will rise in the east at 10 p.m. and reach its azimuth at about 3 a.m.
    But by the end of August when the two planets are closest,
    Mars will rise at nightfall and reach its highest point in the sky at 12:30 a.m.
    That's pretty convenient when it comes to seeing something that no human has
    seen in recorded history.

    So, mark your calendar at the beginning of August to see Mars grow
    progressively brighter and brighter throughout the month.

    1. Re:Text by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 5, Informative

      "It will attain a magnitude of -2.9 and will appear 25.11 arc seconds wide."

      This from Sky & Telescope: 'Mars becomes almost this large every 15 or 17 years -- whenever it passes closest to Earth (near opposition) within a few weeks of the date it is also nearest the Sun (perihelion). For example, in August 1971 the disk became as large as 24.9", and in September 1988 it reached 23.8". Less-ideal views come at intervals of about 2 years 2 months, as in May 1999 when it reached 16.2", and in June 2001 when it attained 20.8". Putting August 2003 in perspective, this is one of five chances (at most) in your entire lifetime that you'll see Mars so clearly.'

      So this month Mars will appear some 0.21 arc-seconds larger than it did in August 1971. This is really not enough for the human eye to make a distinction. That said, you really ought to take advantage of this opposition. I know that I will.

      Clear Skies
      STB

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    2. Re:Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This means that if the trend of the last 5000 years continues (i.e. that Mars is getting closer and closer to earth) that means that eventually Mars will hit the earth! Quick panic, the end is near.

    3. Re:Text by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

      That's pretty convenient when it comes to seeing something that no human has seen in recorded history.

      True, but mars is further away from the sun than us, and naturally when we are closest to it, we will be in pretty much the same point in our orbits. Therefore, its on the opposite side of the earth as the sun, appearing as a full mars, and rising/setting with our night.

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    4. Re:Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was not even alive in 1971 you insensitive clod.

  7. A little... too close by tbase · · Score: 2, Funny

    Over 570 items on eBay alone, and now this! Keep your eyes out for broom-adorned helmets!

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:A little... too close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to blow up Earth. It's blocking my view of Venus!

  8. A 350 million buck Mars research grant coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The Arizona Republic was running a story yesterday ( click here ) on scientists' hopes about getting 350 million bucks in grants for research on Mars. Interesting to see new money from NASA since its budget has been cut to pieces by the current Administration.

  9. Why go to Mars? by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why go to Mars when you've got Rekall?

    >... and about those lobotomies, statistics show that it's safer to use Rekall than to travel to the red planet itself.

    I'm delightfully interested in that Agent-package... Hmm...

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
  10. Re:Does this have a practical purpose? by Ieshan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you read the fucking story, you'd note that the *poster* says he thinks that Nasa has been launching probes (they've launched two to Mars in recent months, rememeber?) to take advantage of this phenomenon. Launching them on "the day" doesn't really accomplish anything, because by the time your probe is launched, Mars is already heading farther away (remember, probes take longer than a day to get to Mars?).

  11. Place that bet by AndyFewt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet that someone from that zetatalk or whatever it was will claim this is the famed Planet-X which was meant to destroy life as we know it back in may/june.

    "Quick, get to your safe locations again, we *really* mean it this time, honest!"

    Anyway, its always nice to see there is (I use this term lightly) "life" outside of this small planet. Now 34,649,589 miles doesnt seem to far. I'll definately have to have a look.

  12. Re:Does this have a practical purpose? by Osty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is there going to be a Mars probe launched on this date of closest approach

    Launching a mission on the date of closest approach would be poor timing. To take advantage of this, missions would need to be launched prior to that date (how long before can be figured out, but I don't know the data to do so). If you launch on the day when Mars and Earth are closest, you'll immediately begin chasing Mars and the trip will not be optimal. If instead you launch before hand, you're travelling towards mars while it's travelling towards you. The rate of movement may be so minimal that it won't make a difference, but I don't know.

  13. Re:Does this have a practical purpose? by error502 · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, it would have had to have been launched before the date of closest approach. If you launched a probe, etc. at Mars (coming towards you), they'll meet up much sooner than if you launch on the date when Earth and Mars are actually nearest (since they're traveling towards each other). If you actually ended up launching on the day that Earth and Mars are closest, then Mars would be moving *away* from the probe shortly after launch, thus making it harder to get to.

  14. The end is near! by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get your affairs in order, the end is near! This would be the perfect time for the Zhti Ti Kofft, as the Martians call themselves, to invade and conquer.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    1. Re:The end is near! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      And remember, if your aluminum foil hat is not Hersheys Kiss like (ala "Signs") it doesn't work...

    2. Re:The end is near! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your aluminum foil hat

      That's TIN FOIL buddy, except no substitutes.

    3. Re:The end is near! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      The conductivity of aluminum is much higher and aluminum doesn't corrode very fast.

      You're with the government, aren't you?

  15. More details by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those looking for more formal/detailed articles:

    Space.com
    abc.net.au
    Telescopes-Astronomy.com - lots of details about suitable telescopes etc.

    As an aside, about an earlier event fromThe Universe Today:
    A rare astronomical event will occur in May 1999- Mars will be the closest it ever gets, only 52.8 million miles. In addition, the Red Planet is in opposition, which means its face is completely lit up by the Sun. Amateur astronomers will be able to see normally obscure features like the polar caps and canyons.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  16. Re:Does this have a practical purpose? by AndyFewt · · Score: 1

    I think there was a linked slashdot article which had a purdy flash animation to explain all the physics involved in sending stuff to mars. Although I don't think the recently launched probes will have arrived there just yet.. I thought it was 9 months or something around that.

  17. Re:Probably? -MOD PARENT UP- by DasBub · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In other news, it has been suggested that eating fast food will make you gain weight and that watching Real TV will make you sterile.

  18. Maps of Mars, including dust storm by Whitecloud · · Score: 5, Informative

    For global views of Mars check here, however at this time of year (August) Mars is enveloped in planet wide dust storms, so the view is going to be obfuscated by all that red grit...if you want to check out before and during storm pics then click here.

    many more pics available from the Mars Global Surveyor: Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC)here.

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

    1. Re:Maps of Mars, including dust storm by twostar · · Score: 4, Funny

      How can a planet be enveloped in more the one Planet Wide storm? :D

    2. Re:Maps of Mars, including dust storm by jesser · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "time of year (August)"? I doubt Mars weather follows an Earty-yearly pattern...

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:Maps of Mars, including dust storm by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true. The martian year is much longer than Earth's. If you were to convert Mars' year, the global dust storms would start sometime around the "August" of Mars and end around "September". But that's local to Mars, and not synchronized to Earth-years in any way as far as I can see.

      Here's a martian calendar.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  19. uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's no mars, it's a space station!

    1. Re:uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking crap, we be screwed ...

  20. Followup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an interesting follow-up thread in the Hick Tech Center's message boards. Check it out

  21. Don't get TOO excited... by JayBlalock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's the Snopes entry on it. Essentially, while it's technically true that this is the closest pass in 60,000 years or so, to most observers there won't be any appreciable difference between this pass and the semi-close passes it makes every 15 years or so. The interest lies mainly in how this makes it more easy to launch probes. (and note the similarity in wording between the Snopes version and the post. Hmmm...)

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  22. Head to the hills, mama! by wiggys · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't know about you but this creeps me right out! I've just been reading this book (guy at work tells me its a transcript of a radio news bulletin) and I'm kinda scared right now.

    Got the wife and kids in a truck, and we're gonna head to the hills for a while. Got meself a shotgun... just in case those Martians come for ME!

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:Head to the hills, mama! by Alioth · · Score: 1

      If you like War of the Worlds, try Jeff Wayne's musical version. Get the original (when I lived in the US, I had to order it from the UK because I could only find the remix in the US which has had lukewarm reviews at best)
      Amazon.co.uk has it.

  23. what? by libnatel · · Score: 0

    this means itll be easier for the martians to invade us.

    oh noooooo............

  24. Re:Probably? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it's NOT the best time to send something to Mars. It would have been best to launch something about a year and a half ago, when mars and earth were moving towards each other, and have the probe REACH Mars when it starts getting farther away.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  25. You can simulate this event in Celestia by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

    Users of Celestia (the stunning open-source galaxy simulator) can verify this and a whole lot of other space events as Mars is, at August 27, 0.373 AU from Earth. When I'm typing this, Mars seems to be 0.410 AU from Earth.

    1 AU = 149,597,870.691 km

    0.373 AU = 55800005 km
    0.410 AU = 61335126 km

    The values seem to be slightly off (by around 1%) when compared to the article's shortest distance, from the approximated planetary orbits.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:You can simulate this event in Celestia by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can also use the program kstars, part of the KDE suite. I've only been playing with it for the past couple days but am impressed. It allows you to retrieve actual images from an observatory for any object in its database, has the obligatory constellation maps, extended info via the web for the major bodies, etc.. It doesn't allow tours through the Solar System as does Celestia, but is useful for any planetbound stargazers out there.

      BTW, the RH8.0 sources build fine on RH9.

    2. Re:You can simulate this event in Celestia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [/usr/ports/astro/celestia]# make install
      ===> celestia-1.2.4 is marked as broken: Does not compile (bad C++ code).

    3. Re:You can simulate this event in Celestia by Gruuue · · Score: 1

      That's a very old version of Celestia, built in the days when g++ was much less picky about certain C++ constructs. Go get version 1.3.0 from here.

      --Chris

    4. Re:You can simulate this event in Celestia by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Just a small URL correction. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. I've seen it by ralphclark · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's fairly big already - about 20 arcseconds I should think - and I've taken a look a few times already the past few days (in my 10" F5 reflector, 4mm ultrawide plossl eyepiece, magnification about 300x). Why look now before opposition? Because it has already passed it's maximum declination in mid-to-late July, even then at about only 25 degrees above the horison where I am, and is now getting lower each night. Even at maximum elevation it was so low that atmospheric distortion mucks up the image quite badly.

    In fact, although this is supposed to be the closest opposition for maybe the past 60,000 years, the low elevation means it's not really such a great observation opportunity for astronomers in the northern hemisphere. I was just about able to make out the southern polar cap and some blurred greyish surface features in the southern hemisphere.

    If you live further South though, there should be some really spectacular views with Mars almost overhead. And it's so bright that you don't need a large telescope - just a good one. And an equatorial mount is a must, because the damn thing moves so fast.

  27. for those of us without telescopes or probes... by selderrr · · Score: 5, Informative

    there's always the astronomy pic of the day

    And for those of us with OSX, there's a macosxhints article that helps you rotate your desktop pic with the APotD

    1. Re:for those of us without telescopes or probes... by mahart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of APotD here's a good composite image of Mars

      I usually only like the high-res pics that have been through a million filters to look sexy...
      APotD often has lots of grainy bland pics that are scientifically useful but not exactly great desktop material

  28. Probably? by Xoid629 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "... this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months."
    Umm... yes, exactly as has been mentioned in most articles mentioning those probes. Seriously, it's not a matter of speculation. Its been quite obvious for some time that several probes have been launched in response to this event.

  29. Re:Probably? by sniggly · · Score: 2, Informative
    They launched em a couple of months ago so that the energy efficiency of the probes were highest so it was least expensive.

    2xUS, 1 European & 1 Japanese probe.

    --
    Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  30. Re:Probably? by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

    The argument in this thread is strictly referencing the probability of Space Organizations launching probes and research vessels to take advantage of a Mars proximity - which is occuring now.

    Thats why the probes are already on their way and will arrive within 4 months.

    That there is a probability is really quite besides the point, it is a certainty that we are talking about. Spirit and Opportunity, Beagle 2, and Nozomi were all planned and launched specifically for this beautiful exploration opportunity.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  31. The Power of /. by joepa · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slashdot has just made "Close Encounters of the Mars Kind" the most read story in the recorded history of Elite Geek (and by quite a large margin).

  32. its a shame by Gimpy-Joe · · Score: 1

    it seems like amateur astronomy has gone onto the back burner for kids these days. Finally! an excuse to find and set up my old telescope

    --
    Good luck in hell.
  33. Re:Probably? by twostar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually the Japanese probe was launched over a year ago (can't remember the exact launch date) and suffered a engine failure. They did some orbit changes and had it swing by Earth agian before heading to Mars a second time. This time how ever it's on a free trajectory and shouldn't need much engine use. They are running extremely low on fuel though and some of the parts have begun to fail. They're not completely sure the probe will make it. But it does result in a swarm of probes heading towards Mars and hopefully will result in alot of data coming back from various parts of the planet and from orbit all at the same time which will give scientist a better overal view of the planet.

  34. Dude.... by Cable_Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Source: My E-Mail.

    That isn't fair! My teachers would never let me reference my email when turning in a paper. >:-(

  35. For the best amateur (MARS) pictures, go here. by deathcow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    These guys are using some of the best cameras and telescopes that amateurs can buy. (Or at least, hope to buy, since there are multi-year long waiting lists.)

    MARS 2003 Pictures

    Every year, amateurs and their techniques are improving. This team of Germans, with their Astro-Physics 10" Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope are on the cutting edge of amateur astrophography.

  36. Telescope + Linux + Mars = KStars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those who are running linux and want to track Mars (among other things), you can use KStars to do just that. KStars with telescope control can be checked out from the CVS now.

    Here is a screenshot showing KStars tracking the moon.

  37. D'Ya Think? by reallocate · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> "...this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months."

    Gee, d'ya think?

    Hopeless, hopeless.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  38. Not if I can help it. by empesey · · Score: 1

    I'm having t-shirts made with the phrase Klaatu Baraada Nictu on the front and

    1) Near Earth collision
    2) Invasion by martians
    3) T-Shirts in designer colors
    4) ???
    5) Profit

    on the back.

    1. Re:Not if I can help it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect we will see Bootleg Marvin the Martian t-shirts with him holding 2 fingers about an inch apart saying "Missed by that* much."
      At the bottom an * and the actual distance.

  39. Saw it last night by mholt108 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Girlfriend looked up into the sky and said oooohhhh isnt that a big star. Deary me! replies he, thats no star viewed from afar, thats just a plantet, get it right god damitt!

    1. Re:Saw it last night by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      I had a similar discussion with my daughter, to her defense she's only three.

    2. Re:Saw it last night by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      I had a similar discussion with my daughter, to her defense she's only three.

      That's funny, so's his girlfriend.

      [rimshot] ;)

      -T

  40. Jeez by LooseChanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "According to Agg over at OCAU, this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months."

    Does this really need to be said?

    --
    Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
  41. What if... by eugene_t00ms · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be great if Shenzhou-5 had a few "undisclosed capabilities" such as planetary landings, and the Chinese decided to shock the world and be the first to Mars. For all of you out there that know more than I about the hardware needed, distances involved and the orbital mechanics of it, would this be within the realm of possibility?

    --
    Belief that Perspectives matter more than Facts = Mark of the Truly Ignorant
    1. Re:What if... by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      You'd have to have a fairly large spacecraft (read, MUCH larger than anything currently launching except the Shuttle which is largely empty cargo space anyway). The reason for the size is because the trip (even one-way) would take months and you need to keep the human crew fed, warm, and breathing. It would be quite easy based on spacecraft size alone to determine if someone were going for something more than an orbital joyride.

    2. Re:What if... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      For all of you out there that know more than I about the hardware needed, distances involved and the orbital mechanics of it, would this be within the realm of possibility?

      The launch window to Mars has now closed which means that the relatively low energy trajectories used by our space probes are no longer available.

      So if the Chinese were to go, they'd better have built one big-ass engine to send them there.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  42. Mars Society Interview by SunPin · · Score: 2, Informative

    In December 2001, I interviewed the Medical Director of the Mars Society for Cyberista. The story is here. Everybody in that organization is superb in their field. Dr. Czarnik was an excellent interview subject.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  43. Azimuth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At the beginning of August, Mars will rise in the east at 10 p.m. and reach its azimuth at about 3 a.m.

    I would have thought, whatever its azimuth is at any given time, there it is already.

  44. War of the Worlds by p51d007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it would be great if some national radio show would rerun Orson Wells radio adaptation of the H.G. Wells classic "war of the worlds" which aired on halloween night in the 30's. For those of you who never heard it, it so panicked the east coast that most of it's residents thought the martians had invaded the world LOL

    1. Re:War of the Worlds by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Or try this version which is superb (DON'T get the re-mix version though).

  45. Headlines in Martian Times by vikrant · · Score: 3, Funny

    An article in the Most popular mars daily paper reads:

    Little green men on Mars are being warned about the upcoming close encounter with our appearently beautiful neighbor, Earth.

    The inhabitants of the planet Earth are known to be greedy, territorial and suicidal (they have enough nuclear power to blow their planet 10 times over. We still don't understand why they call our planet "The God of War"). They have already consumed their home planet, and are expected to be looking towards us during this encounter. Some of them may even try to hop on to our side. Reports confirm 2 or 3 rocket ships launched earlier this year moving towards Mars.

    Continue staying underground in caves. Build no canals, humanoid faces or any other structures on the surface reflecting presence of intelligent life on our planet. continue the planet wide dust storm as it will repel the earthlings.

    Earth will probably stink because of high leavels of pollution.

    ---
    The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in Heaven.
    -- Mark Twain

  46. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  47. Mars will come within 2,400 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    of the 2003 distance in 2208, a 0.007% difference - and came within 12,000 miles in 1924, which is 0.03%, according to The Opposition Cycle Of Mars, by Jeffrey Beish.

  48. Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I don't like to question the submitters, but this has to be one of the most questionable references I've ever seen here.

    How about next time quoting somebody from an orgnaization that is involved with the spacecraft? NASA, ESA (European Space Agency), NASDA (Japan's Space Aerospace Agency) and even CSA (Canadian Space Agency) have all got hardware on the way and probably could provide a inforamtion that is more useful and authoritative than what was put here.

    A good start would be explaining why you would want to send spacecraft when the planets are close together. My understanding is that they were launched to save fuel (ie the latest US Rovers were launched on Delta IIs rather than Titans because the close proximity of Mars allows this). As for why, I have no idea because I would have thought it would take as much energy climbing out of Earth's gravity well regardless of how far away the target is.

    myke

    1. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing. I mean I just don't see the connection :-) I suppose it must have to do with the angle, since as many other posters have pointed out, the Southern Hemisphere (and Austrailia was specificly mentioned) would have the best viewing. However, I think that is quite a reach to OCAU.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    2. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by Agg · · Score: 1
      The funny thing (to me) is that I wasn't actually quoted, I was paraphrased. What's that Slashdot creed about not reading the source article? :)

      My original newspost on OCAU:
      ---
      From Dark_Greg: A rather interesting astronomical phenomenon can be observed over the next month, with Mars being closer to earth then it has been in at least 5,000 years, with some estimates putting it at 60,000 years. Needless to say you wont get another chance to see this again in your lifetime. Details can be found here. That explains all the Mars probes being launched over the last few months.
      ---

      Hopefully you can appreciate the difference in meaning between my use of "that explains" and the mis-quoted "this is probably the reason for".

      But hey, I'm happy to be credited like some kind of expert on interplanetary travel. All that time watching Star Trek wasn't just slacking off, it was research! I'm off to update my resume...

    3. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by RALE007 · · Score: 1
      ...I would have thought it would take as much energy climbing out of Earth's gravity well regardless of how far away the target is...

      Think of getting a probe to Mars as two steps:

      1. Getting off the Earth and out of the gravity well.
      2. Travel immense distance to Mars.

      If Mars is closer, then not as much fuel is needed for step two. If there isn't as much fuel needed for step two, then the load will be lighter for step one. If everything is lighter in step one, a smaller rocket can be used to lift the whole mess off the ground.

      To clear up confusion, the energy needed to escape from the Earths gravitational pull is constant, it's the amount of mass that needs to escape that is different. With Mars closer not as much fuel will be needed to reach the planet, so the probe + fuel lifted by the rocket will be lighter, so a smaller rocket can be used.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    4. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by mikerich · · Score: 1
      I was wondering the same thing. I mean I just don't see the connection :-) I suppose it must have to do with the angle, since as many other posters have pointed out, the Southern Hemisphere (and Austrailia was specificly mentioned) would have the best viewing. However, I think that is quite a reach to OCAU.

      Essentially you want to minimise the amount of energy you need to send a probe away from the planet. You are quite right about needing most energy to climb away from Earth, but you then need additional energy to escape Earth's gravity and place the craft on a trajectory to encounter Mars.

      These trajectories are known as transfer orbits. The most fuel efficient transfer orbits are known as Hohmann orbits. A Hohmann orbit describes an ellipse whose major axis touches the orbits of the two planets at a tangent.

      So imagine Earth and Mars' orbit as seen from above - Earth inside, Mars outside. The transfer orbit forms an ellipse, one end touching the position of Earth at the time the rocket is launched; the other end touching the Martian orbit at the point where Mars will be located when the probe arrives. The spacecraft follows the path of the orbit to Mars, but does not make a total orbit back to the starting point.

      Hohmann orbits are possible between the Earth and Mars every 26 months or so during times when Mars and Earth come closest (so called opposition). These form the launch windows - dates during which a spacecraft can follow a Hohmann trajectory between the two planets.

      It is possible to follow a non-Hohmann orbit between planets, but only at the expense of vastly more energy.

      The current flotilla to Mars is exceptionally large (4 craft - 3 if you exclude Nozomi, which should have been there last opposition), but it is not the largest. In 1971, the Soviet Union launched three craft to Mars, the United States 2. On the Soviet side, one became trapped in Earth orbit and was quietly renamed Kosmos 419. Of the other two, they both reached Mars; Mars 2 was DOA, Mars 3 became the first craft to touch down on Mars, began transmissions, and heartbreakingly failed after 20 seconds. For the Americans, Mariner 8 failed to reach orbit, but that was made up for by the astonishing success of Mariner 9, the first craft to orbit Mars.

      Again in 1973, the Soviet Union launched four spacecraft to Mars (America sat this one out). Mars 4, its retro engine failed to fire and it did not enter Martian orbit, Mars 5 - a success and returned the first colour images of the planet, Mars 6 - a lander, failed about 20 seconds before touchdown and Mars 7 - another lander, lost its orientation and missed Mars entirely!

      I hope that all helps and you're not regretting asking!

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    5. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      That makes sense, but still doesn't explain why an Australian computer overclocking website is quotesd in an article about astronomy.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    6. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by mikerich · · Score: 1
      That makes sense, but still doesn't explain why an Australian computer overclocking website is quotesd in an article about astronomy.

      There are some things I can't explain :)

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    7. Re:Why is Agg at Overclockers Australia Quoted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for everything else, there's MasterCard

  49. No dust storms this year by p_trekkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hauled out my little 8" equatorial reflector to a dark sky site Friday night and had spectacular resolution of surface features. Southern polar cap was crystal clear as were many other surface features that I can't describe very well without a map of Mars handy. That was only at 120-240x. 2 years ago, at the last opposition, I looked at Mars through a scientific grade 12" refractor, and it was just a featureless orange ball. This year is much better. The closeness aspect isn't really so much of an improvement (from an observational standpoint) as the lack of dust storms. I just hope I get a chance to point the big refractor at it again this time around.....

  50. Rocket Scientist by Natchswing · · Score: 1
    > According to Agg over at OCAU, this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months.

    Agg must be a friggin rocket scientist to put those to together, or not for reiterating the obvious.

    Planetary travel is all about delta V.

  51. Actually funny! - Re:DON'T CLICK!! GOATSE.CX LINK by Dasigner · · Score: 1

    I might have my funny bone out of whack today, but I laughed, ummm, my ass out at the ... ah ... comparative astronomy ;) (No, it's not a redirect.)

  52. Bright Mars by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

    This explains why Mars has been so clear and bright in the night sky in recent weeks. A distinctly orange tinted bright light in the sky to the south...

    1. Re:Bright Mars by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      It's the brightest thing in the skies these days.

    2. Re:Bright Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like light pollution from sodium street lights to me! ;-)

    3. Re:Bright Mars by Ominous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think we still have Luna to keep that title. Nice try though.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  53. All those probes... by WoTG · · Score: 1

    It's going to be great watching the data come back from the 4 (I think) probes to Mars. There should be a lot of interesting video and photos over the next couple months. I hope all of the probes make the journey in one piece.

    BTW. Anyone know how "spread out" these probes are supposed to land? I hope that at least one is aimed at one of the polar regions.

    One more thing, to all people who say, "So what, Mars almost as close every 15 years." Well, how long do you expect to live? Every 15 years is somewhere between 3-5 chances in the average lifetime. So, go stare at Mars for a while, it isn't this "big" in the sky every day ya know.

    1. Re:All those probes... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      I hope all of the probes make the journey in one piece.

      Amen to that, we've had amazing luck so far. So let's wish all well - although since I'm over the road from the Beagle 2 team, I have to wish them a little bit more luck than the others.

      Anyone know how "spread out" these probes are supposed to land? I hope that at least one is aimed at one of the polar regions.

      They're all aimed at low latitudes close to the Equator. For them to reach the poles takes a fancy flightpath and a bit more fuel. It also adds an extra element of risk. For Beagle 2, simple weight constraints precludes anything other than an equatorial landing site, for the other two, NASA want to play things nice and safe.

      The approximate landing locations are:

      Beagle 2 : Isidis Basin, an ellipse centred around 270E, 10.5N, which places it East of Syrtis Major and North of Libya Montes. Landing 25th December 2003, although confirmation will not be made until the 26th.

      MER 1, Gusev Crater, 175E, 14.5S. Landing 5th January 2004.

      MER 2, Meridiani, around 355E, 2S. Landing 25th January 2004.

      So as you can see, they are well spread out around the central region.

      The other two craft, Mars Express and Nozomi are orbiters.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  54. Close approach by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Trouble is for us Northern Hemisphere dwellers that the close Mars opposition happens 1) with Mars in a low-declination constellation like Scorpius or Sagitarius, putting it down on the horizon and down in the murk, and 2) at the peak of mosquito season. How are you folks in Oz looking forward to Mars viewing?

    1. Re:Close approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How are you folks in Oz looking forward to Mars viewing?

      Our daily outside walk is only during the day, sorry.

  55. Just heard on the radio... by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some sort of weird thing is going on in Northern New Jersey. Not sure what it is, but evidently there was some kind of an explosion and communications with a town was lost...

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Just heard on the radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's happening in a small town near Princeton. And I hear a new Defense contractor set up a factory there run by a bunch of guys named 'John'

    2. Re:Just heard on the radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better mobilize the Blue Blazers

  56. Useful Links by Bob+The+Lizard · · Score: 1

    Couple of quick links.

    Mars in 2003: Which Side Is Visible?
    http://skyandtelescope.com/

    Mars at Its All-Time Finest
    http://skyandtelescope.com/

  57. Perhaps if there are WMD on mars..... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    I say, the terrorists have hidden WMD on mars, and are pointing the LASER to earth. Bush better give nasa $500 billion to make a space battleship fleet and colonize, i mean liberate Mars!!!!

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  58. Probably? by CommieBozo · · Score: 1
    According to some web site about overclocking, this is probably the reason many Mars probes have been launched recently

    Could you not be bothered to find out for sure? Why is your source for this non-information a web site about overclocking?

    Oh, wait, it's okay. This isn't real journalism.

  59. Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it blocks my view of Venus!

    Marvin

  60. Re:DON'T CLICK!! GOATSE.CX LINK! by Eccles · · Score: 1

    whatever you do, don't click on the parent post's so-called "ASS-tronomy pic of the day." It is just a goatse.cx redirect!

    Huh? It's just a picture of the rings around Uran -- oh, never mind.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  61. ROTFL... by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    What's really funny is that the window for launching the probes was mentioned every freaking time one of them went up, but apparently international news isn't as reputable a source as "elitegeek".

  62. The chances of anything coming from Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are a million to one...

    but still, they come!

    1. Re:The chances of anything coming from Mars... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > but still, they come!

      Damn you... the background on that is all a salmon-reddish color and after closing the page my eyes were blinded by slashdot's white BG.

  63. Starry Night - Mars Encounter Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Starry Night has released a nice little util that tracks the approach to mars. Its pretty neat.

    Runs on osX and win.

    http://www.starrynight.com/MarsEncounter/

  64. similarity in wording by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

    I was noticing that. It would be interesting to learn the the history of that article, whether the post was first or the Snopes one.

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  65. According to Agg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for you interest, "Agg", yes, that is correct.

  66. Well, he wants to be famous... by Dalcius · · Score: 1

    IBM Lawyers: Mr. Darl McBride, if you'll please follow us to our conference room, we think we've found a solution which will prove beneficial to both parties.

    [A few minutes later]
    What? Oh, this is just our new office -- modern arco and such. Watch your head.

    Yes, just strap yourself in nice and tight. Normal proceedure. We'll be right back, we've got to go fetch our documents.

    *door locks*

    --
    ~Dalcius
    Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  67. Astrologically speaking... by erfmuffin · · Score: 1
    I realise slashdot isn't really a forum for astrology or any of that weird hippy shit you can't measure, test or quantify...

    ... but does anyone else think its weird that classically speaking Mars is the planet/god/symbol for war?

  68. Pics of Mars Aug 4 2am by kyoorius · · Score: 1

    I quickly snapped some pics of Mars tonight before the storm clouds rolled back in. This is probably what you can expect to see through a pair of binoculars or telescope throughout the middle of August.

    http://www.techfreakz.org/astro2/?slide=25

    Oh, and you don't have to live in a dark area to see it. The pics were taken 15 miles outside of NYC.

  69. A-hah! by SurturZ · · Score: 1

    I was wondering what that great big red dot in the sky was.

    Oh wait, I'm hung over.

  70. Today is August 25th 2003 by EqualSlash · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.earthsky.com/2003/es030826.html

    --

  71. Agg... by Groganz · · Score: 1
    According to Agg over at OCAU, this is probably the reason for all the Mars probes launched over the last few months.
    Dammit if Agg said it, it's good enough for me.
  72. that might explain a lot by Pitty · · Score: 0

    that might explain why the global weather goes insane this summer, China has been experiencing the hottest summer in the last 60 years, and the whole British Columbia is burning which forced the provincial government asks 7,000 people to evacuate.

  73. 75 ma by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

    "At a modest 75-power magnification, Mars will look as large as the full moon to the naked eye."

    Uh, I'm not sure about other people's naked eyes, but mine only do a modest 1-power.

    Who is this guy, the 6 million dollar man?

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  74. Things to look forward to? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    No one would have believed in the first years of the twenty-first century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man's... ...Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.

  75. Credit for joke goes to Futurama? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


    I believe I saw that joke for the first time on Futurama. The old professor says it.

  76. Earth-Mars Close Encounter animation by tricaric · · Score: 1

    Hi, I've created a small animation representing this close encounter. It is available here: http://orsa.sourceforge.net/atwork.html Hope you like it! --Pasquale

  77. (next to the moon) by md65536 · · Score: 1

    On the 27th there will be a new moon, which will make Mars even better to watch.

    The "(next to the moon)" looks like it was added as a correction, but it's more misleading than true. Mars will be the brightest object in the night sky that night.

  78. Re:Pics of Mars Aug 4 2am by SakuraTsubaki · · Score: 1

    The next time Mars may come this close is in 2287. Due to the way Jupiter's gravity tugs on Mars and perturbs its orbit, astronomers can only be certain that Mars has not come this close to Earth in the last 5,000 years but it may be as long as 60,000 years. The encounter will culminate on August 27th when Mars comes to within 34,649,589 miles and will be (next to the moon) the brightest object in the night sky. It will attain a magnitude of -2.9 and will appear 25.11 arc seconds wide. At a modest 75-power magnification, Mars will look as large as the full moon to the naked eye! Mars will be easy to spot. At the beginning of August, Mars will rise in the east at 10 p.m. and reach its azimuth at about 3 a.m. But by the end of August when the two planets are closest, Mars will rise at nightfall and reach its highest point in the sky at 12:30 a.m. And now for something completely different... I read your question about wanting to know who did the song for the Underworld Trailer and the correct answer would be Artist: Agent Provocateur, Song : Red Tape. Just in case you haven't found out yet. :) His stuff is amazing but what people don't realize this music was originally released in 1984. Thank God that people are finally realizing talent from long ago!!!

  79. 72 power lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a bunch of crap! I have a meade 114mm, and I went out last night 10mm eyepiece 1000mm focal length or 100X magnification, it was only as big as a BB.