Slashdot Mirror


A Water Molecule's Chemical Formula Isn't Really H20

hackwrench writes "According to this article in Physics News Update, a water molecule's chemical formula is really not H2O, at least from the perspective of neutrons and electrons interacting with the molecule for only attoseconds (less than 10-15 seconds). According to new and recent experiments, neutrons and electrons colliding with water for just attoseconds will see a ratio of hydrogen to oxygen of roughly 1.5 to 1, so a more accurate formula for water under these circumstances would be H1.5O."

18 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. Still water! by trompete · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, as long as it's still wet, there's no reason to panic.

  2. Re:H2O, H3O, and OH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One of those 125% glasses, eh? They're supersizing everything these days.

  3. Re:H2O, H3O, and OH by otuz · · Score: 3, Funny

    The big deal is you'd end up with a glass 125% full of water.

  4. It's a scam by Frac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course it's wrong! Now they'll have to update all the chemistry textbooks, and of course all the old editions will be worthless now. Ah HA!

    What they don't tell you is that they got a bunch of other "corrections" under their sleeve. You know, because in a year or so they're going to need another excuse to roll out a new edition.

    Quite similar to Microsoft's "pay us to upgrade, so you can patch up the bugs we created in the first place!" biz model, actually. ;-P

  5. Scientist to struggling chemistry students... by quandrum · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just kidding!

  6. Their results are suspect by karmavore · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly their test samples were contaminated with dihydrogenmonoxide.

    --
    Speech: Free
    Beer: $699.00
  7. Re:Can you say WRONG by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they used an old Pentium processor...

    =Smidge=

  8. Re:water in time by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if it was H2O.99999973 , we'd know what CPU they used to count it with....

    --
  9. Re:Question. by Lady+Jazzica · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mabe cp30?

    It can't be that, since water doesn't contain phosphorus.

    C3PO:


    C

    |

    C = C - P = O

  10. H-2-WHOA!! by quinkin · · Score: 4, Funny
    But that will mess-up up the name of the waterslide in the Simpsons...

    H-2-WHOA!

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  11. Re: H2O, H3O, and OH by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    > The big deal is you'd end up with a glass 125% full of water.

    It keeps you from getting bogged down in the half-empty/half-full debate.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  12. Change water all you want by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    H-2-0, H-3-0, H-1.5-0 I don't care.

    But consider yourselves warned: Leave my caffeine molecule alone!

    1. Re:Change water all you want by Garridan · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...or he'll fall asleep and stop posting inane comments about his caffiene addiction.

      Speaking of, I think I need some more espresso. I hope the hydrogen in the water I'm about to boil hasn't read this article... or 1/4 of the hydrogen atoms might suddenly dissasociate from the water and explode!

  13. Be careful by isn't+my+name · · Score: 4, Funny

    See this lengthy thread from years ago.

  14. Re:H2O, H3O, and OH by jonadab · · Score: 5, Funny

    > The big deal is you'd end up with a glass 125% full of water.

    Ah, but if you take a couple of sips, then you'll have a glass that
    is three-quarters full and three-quarters empty. Get another glass
    just like it, drink yet a few _more_ sips out of it, until it's
    one-quarter full and one-quarter empty, pour them together, and the
    glass will be full and not full. You know, the full glass that
    cannot be empty is not the true full glass, and all that zen rot.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  15. Can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    for PC running at 200 Yhz with 256 Zettas of memory...

  16. Re:No single instant of time by Garridan · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, I think they meant 10-15 seconds. That can be simplified to -5 seconds. Of course they got such improbable results! They were using a negative value for time!

  17. Re:Question. by jx100 · · Score: 3, Funny

    CCCP=0? hmm... I guess the Soviet Union did fall...