Slashdot Mirror


New Great Ape Discovered?

DrLudicrous writes "CNN is running a story about sightings of an ape in central Africa that doesn't seem to fit the description of known apes. Pictures of the animal are rare, but it seems slightly taller than most gorillas, with a flatter face. One woman even reported seeing it walk upright on two legs. It has been hypothesized that the ape might be a new species, a subspecies, or perhaps a hybrid between two other species."

35 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Here are more pictures. by rkz · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Here are more pictures. by tkittel · · Score: 5, Funny

      > This is another picture of the great ape in its natural habitat

      and here is yet another great ape...

  2. That explains it... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wondered why CowboyNeal hasn't been showing up in the polls...he's been out camping!

    Let me say that I like CN and think he should be in all the polls. This post is intended to be good natured and not mean spririted.

  3. _Clever_ tricks? by errl · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    """
    Williams and the trackers used some clever tricks to lure the mystery apes.
    Pictures of the 'mystery ape' are rare because the animals are skittish and aggressive. Here a researcher captured an image from afar of one of the animals with her offspring.

    "One of my trackers made the sound of a duiker, a small antelope, as if it were in pain," said Williams. Four or five of the mystery primates fell for the ruse and came running to kill it.
    """

    I'd classify that as a stupid trick. Come on, sounding like something the animals want to kill doesn't seem clever at all methinks :).

    1. Re:_Clever_ tricks? by Queuetue · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's all relative. It's more clever than making a sound like an angry elephant or a machine gun.

  4. evolution by Ugodown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article didn't mention anything about how it might be considered a 'missing link'. It it is indeed its own species, this discovery will have significant anthropological rammifications. If it is just a hybrid, this discovery might not mean much.

    --
    --- to swing on the spiral...
  5. It's probably a subspecies of giant chimp by grug0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least that's what the National Geographic and the NPR articles conclude. It's easier to swallow than the idea of a chimp and a gorilla getting it on.

    1. Re:It's probably a subspecies of giant chimp by rde · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's easier to swallow than the idea of a chimp and a gorilla getting it on.
      Especially when you consider that gorillas are so poorly endowed when compared to their chimp cousins. To paraphrase Samuel L. Jackson, that'd have to be one charming mother-fuckin' ape.

      For Darwin's sake, people. Evolution is a continuum; species don't magically transform from one to another. However long ago chimps and gorillas genetic company, it was a sufficiently short time ago (cosmically speaking) that there could well be variants around; especially when you consider how inaccessable areas like the Congo are for interlopers. They could cheerfully wander, undisturbed, for hundreds of millennia.

      One of the reasons that Creationists still hold such pernicious sway is that they can point at news reports (and even the odd paleontologist) who make sweeping statements that a few minutes' thought would tell you is silly. I can't say for certain that a chimp/gorilla hybrid is impossible, but it's certainly unlikely, especially given the alternatives.

  6. Re:What is amazing is.. by errl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not really, they state that it could be a hybrid of a gorilla and a chimp, if that is the case, the hybrid could have been quite newly "created".

  7. Obligatory reply by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new ape masters.

  8. Some more by suteri · · Score: 3, Informative

    This guy seems to be the main researcher with these apes. Check this article.

    http://karlammann.com/bondo.html
  9. Yeti at home by emptybody · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have they taken foot casts to see if maybe they translate to the yeti casts seen previously?

    maybe this is not so far fetched after all..

    --
    comment directly in my journal
    1. Re:Yeti at home by jackb_guppy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just do not get why the science community is so surprised...

      Do not the Bigfoot and Abominable Snowman Clans need time off for vacation from time to time.

  10. Ape Poo by Davak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We compared fecal samples from this unknown animal to the DNA of captive gorillas, bonobos, and chimps," Louis said. "Our preliminary data shows that the mitochondrial DNA is chimp-like."

    But mitochondrial DNA is passed down only from the mother's side. So if this species or sub-species is a hybrid of a chimp mother and a gorilla father, current DNA would only identify information from the mother.

    First of all... yuck.

    If they can obtain enough cells from the poo to extract the mitochondrial DNA, why can't they PCR the rest of the DNA as well?

    It must be extremely difficult to find just the cells and resulting DNA from this new ape-like creature. Poo must contain a ton of cells from all the injested material. I just don't understand why it's easier to extract the DNA from the mitochondria? Seems if you have the mitochondria... then you have the cells which should contain ALL the nuclear material.

    Anyway... it's been a long time since my genetics/biochem courses.

    Davak
    1. Re:Ape Poo by scrub76 · · Score: 4, Informative
      There are a few reasons why mitochondrial DNA is preferable to genomic DNA for this sort of speciation study:

      1) Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is easier to work with. While a cell will have two copies of genomic DNA (one each inherited from the mother and father), the same cell will have hundreds to thousands of copies of mtDNA. This makes it easier to extract PCR-amplifyable DNA from a small number of cells.

      2) There is more variation (on a per nucleotide basis) in mtDNA than in genomic DNA, making it easier to resolve small differences between species (and possibly enabling differentiation between a new species and a hybrid).

      3) I think that mtDNA is inherited only from the mother, which means that there is no recombination between paternal and maternal DNA. This makes it easier to construct a genetic history of a sample (there is less 'noise' in the data).

    2. Re:Ape Poo by tulare · · Score: 4, Informative

      erm. I'll bite.

      First of all, the kind of cells that they are looking for are most likely those sloughed off the lower GI tract, as the hydrochloric acid in the stomach will pretty much completely do a number on the DNA of any ingested animal. Knowing that, they only have to look for a particular type of cell in the poo with a microscope to start building a sample. Poor Mr. Chimpanzee, Ingested, if he exists, won't produce such pristine cells anymore - these are higher primates, after all, and as such are going to prefer to chew their food rather than swallow it whole.

      As to the blood sample, perhaps you forgot to read the article which pointed out
      a) The not insignificant hazards in doing so both due to the animal's large size and apparent agressiveness, and also due to the fact that people in the Congo have recently been slaughtering one another with pretty much anything at hand - it's a difficult place to do research at the moment, and
      b) They are in fact in the process of habituating the apes so that such collections can become possible.

      As far as sedating one, think about the challenge - these appear to be social, agressive, and very large animals. Doubtless they would take a very dim view on anyone shooting one of their relatives and then going after that relative with a sharp object, and considering the fact that they are fscking HUGE, they certainly have the means to do something about it if they have to. Best to make friends =]

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  11. In Related News... by 1s44c · · Score: 3, Funny


    ...SCO have claimed the ape as their property and have started legal action against National Geographic for breaking the terms of their licence.

  12. Hot news by simgod · · Score: 5, Funny

    George Bush has been switched with an ape by a mistake during his recent trip to Africa explained the State Department today. They have all been wondering for some time why the president shaves every six hours.
    The "real president" was discovered by a CIA expedition which was able to locate the president by using an ultra-sensiteve sound recorder to match the sounds in the jungle with his distinctive sounds "terrorist, daddy, oil"

  13. Re:What is amazing is.. by leandrod · · Score: 3, Informative
    > or it's that missing link anthropologists have been searching for

    This would be more like evolutionary biologists than anthropologists; the later are concerned with man as man, not as an animal.

    Anyway, tall order. It is not a specie that will fill the gap. There would need to be a big number of fossiles and (or) living species discovered to fill the multiple gaps in evolutionary evidence, and not only near man but all over the classification of animals and vegetables.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  14. Re:good news for anthropologists by qwertyatwork · · Score: 3, Funny

    This can lead to only one thing...a race of super apes to enslave humanity. And I for one welcome our new ape overlords!

  15. Re:_Clever_ tricks? or Expendible trackers? by IDigUNIX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take note how it says "One of my trackers made the sound". It makes no mention of how far away the researcher was. The natural scientific explaination is that the trackers are expendible and easily replaced.

    This hypothisis was demonstrated beatifully in the old "Mutual of Omaha Wild Kingdom" shows when I was a kid. The host would always be standing well out of range of the king cobra while saying "Now watch as my assistant charms the snake using body motions".

  16. Re: What is amazing is.. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful


    > My call is either it's a hoax, or it's that missing link anthropologists have been searching for. If it's the latter, it's a huge discovery.

    No one is looking for any "missing link". The fossil record is full of "missing links", and the joke is that every time you find one you create two more, one to either side.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  17. I thought about Cichton's book, Congo. by gacp · · Score: 3, Informative
    Hey! A giant ape. And in the same region. Crichton based ``Congo'' on the kakundakari, supposedly a giant ape of the Congo that people claim to have been seing for ages. Before you say no, remember that science had `proved' that gorillas did not exist, and denied the reality of the giant panda for ca. 60 years. Maybe there is something to this kakundakari. Who knows?

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
  18. Probably a large chimpanzee by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I presume the term "new species" means one that homo sapiens sapiens has not yet discovered and put on the menu. Theorising this to be a "hybrid" is simply fantastic speculation: Occam's razor suggests that it's a relative of the species already known, and given the description of the flat face, it would be a large chimpanzee.
    If this is not a hoax, it will probably be found that local people know of the species and consider them to be "men of the forest" or whatever. Second prediction: the unfortunate animals will rapidly end up on the "bushmeat" menu of those freaks who enjoy eating the flesh of near-human species such as gorillas and chimpanzees. Third prediction: the study of the giant chimp (if that it is) will be limited to skulls, thighbones, and the occasional skin, with the wild population extinct and maybe one or two sad individuals "liberated" and stuck in zoo prisons.
    Central Africa has two species of gorilla and three subspecies of chimpanzee, and large chimpanzee individuals are not unknown. So it's most likely this is another chimpanzee subspecies that has adopted gorilla habits (such as sleeping on the ground) simply because it's too large to nest in trees.
    We should be treating these near-human cousin species with respect, but it seems that chimpanzees and gorillas are of most interest to humans because they are edible.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  19. Wrong Ape movie by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
    And the mystery apes hoot when the moon rises and sets, something chimps don't do for fear of attracting lions and hyenas, Williams said.
    Obviously these are apes like Moon-Watcher, but were in the john or something when the black monolith taught everyone to throw bones.
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. Re: What is amazing is.. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Informative


    > It's always seemed odd to me that we are "up here" while apes and chimps are "down there" and other mammals kind of dribble down from that. Why nothing in-between?

    Right now is sort of an anomaly in the family tree. For most of "human" history there were multiple species of "humans" living concurrently, and there were formerly many more species of ape alive at the same time too.

    Also, the lack of in-between-ness is exaggerated by the nonlinearity of what has been going on in our species. If you compare the material culture of modern humans to that of chimps it looks like an unbridgeable gulf, but if you instead compare our material culture of 1,000, 10,000, 100,000, and 1,000,000 years ago to the current material culture of chimps, the gap really closes up.

    It appears that a small difference in cognitive ability can make a huge difference when its results are allowed to accumulate over the millenia.

    > It would be cool if there was some other species that slightly filled that gap bewteen us and the animals.

    True, but arguably there already is. Take away the chimps and observe how wonderfully they fill the gap between ourselves and gorillas. Take away gorillas and observe how well they fill the gap between us+chimps and the other apes.

    Our corner of the family tree is an interestingly dense bush as it is, and would be even more interesting if not for the extinctions over the past few million years.

    Recommended readings:

    "The Culture of Chimpanzees" (PDF) Overview of culture among chimpanzees.

    "Planet of the Apes" (Just a tease; see the full article in your neighborhood library.) Breadth of the ape family tree in the Miocene.

    "Hominid Species" What we currently know about our sub-branch of the family tree.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  21. Oliver by mrbuttle · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Perhaps an example of one living in captivity for the last 40 years is Oliver ( see here or here. From the first link:

    Oliver surfaced in the early 1970s, when he was acquired as a baby by trainers Frank and Janet Burger whose dog, chimp, pony and pig acts were once regularly featured on the Ed Sullivan Show, at Radio City Music Hall, and once even by dancer Gene Kelly. "He came in from Africa with three other chimps that one of Frank's brothers had sent over from the Congo. But this one we could never use. He was odd and the other chimps would have nothing to do with him,'' recalled Janet Burger, 69. But if Oliver was strange in appearance, and was shunned by other chimps, his intelligence and personality were also quite different from the other apes in the Burgers' entourage. "You could send him on chores. He would take the wheelbarrow and empty the hay and straw from the stalls. And when it was time to feed the dogs, he would get the pans, and mix the dog food for me. I'd get it ready and he'd mix it,'' she said. As he grew older, Oliver also acquired habits normally enjoyed only by humans, including a cup of coffee and a nightcap. "This guy, Oliver, he enjoyed sitting down at night and having a drink, and watching television. He'd mix his own. He'd pour a shot of whiskey and put some Seven-Up in there, stir it and drink it,'' she recalled.

    1. Re:Oliver by 0111+1110 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, that is an interesting link. This is all kind of cool and creepy. I'm surprised no one has yet mentioned De Loys Ape. A creepy and genuinely old photo, first published in a newspaper in the late 1920s I think.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  22. Hybrid? by sin(theta) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alright, who's been having sex with gorillas?

  23. Re:A loaf of bread, a twig of ants & thou... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    those inversions would lead to cross-breeding sterility.

    It seems sometimes nature has a way of overcoming scientific certainties.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. Nah ... by zonix · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nah, that's just a Ferengi in the gorilla suit!

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  25. Re:What is amazing is.. by mishac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thats not a completely valid test...over the years they've found a few female mules capable of being impregnated by a horse or donkey. In addition, female big-cat hybrids, like "Ligers" and "Tigons" or "Jaguleps", etc, are often fertile, and can be impregnated to produce 3-species hybrids (Do a google search for "Lijagulep" or "Ti-liger"...to lazy to do it myself). So maybe the criteria should be that species are seperate if they can't produce fertile *MALE* offspring....

  26. Covering all your bases? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Funny

    It has been hypothesized that the ape might be a new species, a subspecies, or perhaps a hybrid between two other species.

    About the only thing left out of that list is 'existing species'... if you add that then you can just rewrite:

    It has been hypothesized that the ape might be an ape :)

  27. Homer! by Drakker · · Score: 3, Funny

    First thing that got into my head was Homer running covered with mud. Homer Simpsons is the great Ape!

    It was in one of the first episodes, everyone must have seen it at least once. ;)