Slashdot Mirror


Renegade Reverse Engineering - John Woo Style

MankyD writes "Just saw the trailer to a new John Woo film over at apple.com called PayCheck. Written by Phillip K Dick of Blade Runner and Minority Report, its a story about a top notch reverse engineer (Ben Affleck) who, after a quick memory wipe, finds trying to piece together the mystery of his past. It's also got Uma Thurman as the female lead. Unfortunately the website isn't up and running yet, and the premise of the movie seems a little far fetched, but this still ought to be a fun one."

59 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. website wipe by QEDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    its a story about a top notch reverse engineer who, after a quick memory wipe, finds trying to piece together the mystery of his past... Unfortunately the website isn't up and running yet
    Duh! They wiped his memory and his website too.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  2. Chasing Amy was top of his game? by jvarsoke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else see "Ben Afleck" and stop reading?

    1. Re:Chasing Amy was top of his game? by ajlitt · · Score: 4, Funny

      I disagree. He was much more believable in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.

    2. Re: Chasing Amy was top of his game? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


      Surely Gigli is more notable, with it's record-breaking 1.5 IMDB rating, up a full 7% from the 1.4 it had when I first heard about it last week.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Chasing Amy was top of his game? by critter_hunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, the Big Hit isn't a Woo movie. He's one of the 10 or so producers, not exactly what I'd call involved in the (pseudo) artistic process.

      John Woo didn't do anything good since he made it to Hollywood. I thought Broken Arrow was nice when I was 12, Face|Off had some cool gunfights, and MI2 had a few nice action scene, but overall they were all terrible.

      Not that anything John Woo made back in HK was all that great, but it was still much better than the tripe he's spweing these days. Actually, I can't think of a single Chinese actor who has been doing better in the US than in HK. Although, if Jet Li stopped making movies with lame rappers he'd be faring quite good - The One was great fun

      Anyway, all this to say that John Woo's name isn't as much a turn-off as much as, say, Michael Bay. Ben Affleck, however, is even worse than Keanu Reeves. How can a guy who has been in *Daredevil*, *Reindeer Games* and *Gigli* be allowed to keep making movies. He's like a failure magnet.

      Here's how to recognize a good Affleck movie: Matt Damon's in it. From there it's only a small step to give all the credit to Mr Damon.

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    4. Re:Chasing Amy was top of his game? by Stormie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on, Affleck was the bomb in "Phantoms" !!!

    5. Re:Chasing Amy was top of his game? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think he played Ben Affleck in that one ...

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    6. Re:Chasing Amy was top of his game? by jayratch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and since it's all Matt Damon, then without Affleck his best was in "Bourne Identity"? I appreciate suspension of disbelief, but when a non-scifi movie asks me to abandon rather than suspend, I tend to wish I'd spent my $8.75 on... umm...

      what else can you do that costs about the same, takes up a single evening, yet is equally painful?

      come to think of it, IMHO Affleck and Damon are good as a team, just about worthless individually.

    7. Re: Chasing Amy was top of his game? by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gigli has, to date, raked in an amazing $5,600,000. (It cost $54,000,000 to make, not including marketing).

      Freddy Got Fingered, however, has grossed $14,249,005 to date, and cost $15,000,000 to make.

      Let's hope that Gigli doesn't get close.

      It's sad to think that for $15,000 (give or take), I can make a 35 minute short which will be much more entertaining than this (the script is ready, it's nearly completely cast, all we need is a location and financing). Yet I'm having trouble getting the money to do my short, while crap like this has no trouble getting cash.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    8. Re: Chasing Amy was top of his game? by wossName · · Score: 4, Funny

      I liked what The Onion found out about Gigli. :)

      --
      Someone is wrong on the Internet!
    9. Re: Chasing Amy was top of his game? by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's sad to think that for $15,000 (give or take),

      If its gonna be that good can I suggest CREDIT CARDS!!!!!! As my dad always says : Entrepreneurship starts with 5 credit card applications, and ends with bankrupcy or marble floors. Give it a go! You know you want to!

  3. Uma by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stop! You had me at "Uma Thurman as the female lead."

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  4. Just to be pedantic by noewun · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's "Philip K. Dick, whose novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was adapted by Ridley Scott into the brilliant sci-fi movie Blade Runner, and whose short story Minority Report was turned into a steaming pile of crap by Steven Spielberg."

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    1. Re:Just to be pedantic by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's "Philip K. Dick, whose novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was adapted by Ridley Scott [...]

      s/adapted/ignored/

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Just to be pedantic by HBergeron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, but also so very true. While after 20 years Blade Runner is still the ultimate cyberpunk film (not that someone couldn't make a better one, they just don't seem to be trying.) Minority Report - whose riffs on justice and government power were desperately needed at the exact moment the movie was released, was exactly that steaming pile of crap. By failing to address those themes in the way that Dick had at such a crucial moment in time, Spielberg committed more then the artistic sin of being a hack, (and a hack who manipulates the same three themes of children, family, and fear of the unknown over and over and over again without ever saying anything original or anything old in a new way), he also failed utterly in the responsibility of the artist to provide a mirror for society and prompt discussion and/or change.

      Between Dick and Vonnegut we've got 20 or so themes that could be turned into spectacular films, and money making ones at that. Hell, even Total Recall (Dick short story) in its' better moments touched on some themes that raised it above the levels of crap scifi like "The Sixth Day".

      What's really sad is that even Gibson's Johnny M. could have made an incredible movie if they had just played it straight. A friend (actually makes a living as a writer) once mapped out the short story in script form and showed that you could have filmed it without alteration and come up with an under two hour Hollywood film. You had novel chases, character development, the introduction of a world and characters that would support many sequels, some great fight scenes, and an ultra-stylish cyberpunk environment, and those fuckers still screwed it up.

      Bah, why do I care.

      --
      THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...
  5. So you're telling me... by useosx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Ben Affleck is a master at reverse engineering??? I'm sorry I can't stop laughing. I can picture him "thinking really hard", "staring at the screen", "putting the pieces together", etc. God, this should be a good one, I can't wait.

    Can he reverse engineer JoLo's booty?

    1. Re:So you're telling me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can he reverse engineer JoLo's booty?

      Who cant?

    2. Re:So you're telling me... by cfish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Ben Affleck does have an unusually large head...

      Between Affleck's huge head and J-Lo's giant ass, thier children are gona look like barbells.

  6. awesome by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Philip K. Dick is awesome, but I've always kind of been on the fence about John Woo and Ben Affleck. I'll probably bow down to the hollywood Gods and go see it. However, I'll go hoping for the best and expecting the worst.

  7. no by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 3, Informative

    That was Dogma.

    Also, Kevin Smith has pretty much sucked ass since then.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  8. memory wipe? by Lxy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a story about a top notch reverse engineer (Ben Affleck) who, after a quick memory wipe, finds trying to piece together the mystery of his past.

    After seeing Gigli, I wished for a quick memory wipe.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:memory wipe? by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Funny
      After seeing Gigli, I wished for a quick memory wipe.

      Carefull, if you did that, you might decide to go see it again.

      And when the memory wipe wore off (they always seem to in movies, don't they?) you'd have seen it twice. Or maybe more if you'd gotten the idea more than once!

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  9. Re:Looks like a good one by tealover · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've come to expect nothing but crap from Hollywood.

    In the spirit of the Open Source community, why don't you make your own movies ? Sounds like you have an itch to scratch (and i'm not talking about your crabs).

    :)

    --
    -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
  10. Sounds Like ... by Honig+the+Apothecary · · Score: 5, Interesting
    after a quick memory wipe, finds trying to piece together the mystery of his past

    This sounds like Memento. Maybe instead of a polaroid and tattoos, they will use a pda or cell phone with acamera for him to remember what happened.Or not.

    Although the Uma aspect is tantalizing. :-)

    Honig
  11. IMDB Movie Listing, ISFDB story listing by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's the IMDB listing for the movie.

    According to the Internet Speculative Fiction Database, the story originally came out in 1953. (It's one of the Dick stories I haven't read yet.) Dick always was waaaaay ahead of the curve. (Anyone else notice how dead-on the youth-culture extropilations of Time Out of Joint were?)

    Maybe we can hope for John Woo to return to his previous form of Hard Boiled and The Killer.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:IMDB Movie Listing, ISFDB story listing by discogravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PKD was so paranoid and loony that no-one -- least of all himself -- though his stuff would be seen as anything but pulp fantasy. And now it's creepy how spot on he could be about some things.

    2. Re:IMDB Movie Listing, ISFDB story listing by ralphus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Read his last three books, VALIS, Divine Invasion and the Transmigration of Timothy Acher. These were in no way pulp fantasy, they were incredibly deep and meaningful and beautiful and ugly all in one. They were truth.

      I'd love to see someone turn the VALIS trilogy into a movie and actually make it work and stay true to the book. The only names I can think of are combinations of people such as the Warchoski bros crossed with David Lynch.

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
  12. mmm. . . Astroturfalicous! by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 2, Troll

    C'mon guys, I can see the ad for this movie if I go to the Apple trailers site, a site dedicated to advertising. I don't need to see ads posted as news on this putatively news site. Given the size and interests of /.'s readership, I understand why studios and production companies want to start phoney "grassroots" buzz about their films here, but do the editors really have to accept the story submissions?

    1. Re:mmm. . . Astroturfalicous! by imac.usr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Given the size and interests of /.'s readership, I understand why studios and production companies want to start phoney "grassroots" buzz about their films here, but do the editors really have to accept the story submissions?

      Although I agree that this is sort of tenuous as far as /. news goes, my guess is that if the story really was submitted by an undercover marketer, they would have at least waited for the website to be online. At least, I'd wait until then.

      --
      I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  13. Re:Looks like a good one by lightcycle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The thing I like about Philip K Dick is his ability to take _really_ far-fetched stories and still make all the pieces fit. Of course, this is mostly true for his stories in written form, the movies based on them mostly lack the depth found in his writing. OTOH, I have yet to see a PKD-based movie that is boring. I find Blade Runner to be by far the best, but the others (Total Recall, Screamers and Minority Report) are at least entertaining.

    --

    The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
    in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
  14. Let me guess... by r00tarded · · Score: 4, Funny

    At the end he figures out he was the male lead in Gigli and re-wipes his brain.

  15. Re:Looks like a good one by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was about to say "It sounds nice at first, but what's the point of making a movie if half a viewers know it in detail before it's 20% complete? It doesn't seem to fit the open development model of 'start a cool project and let the customer base finish it.'", but then thought of something

    One could, of course, produce software under a modified GPL that says that all media produced under it be free (as in speech), which would require that all imported media must have been free in the same respect. 3D models like people, cars, helicopters, building, office equipment, and such would be free to anyone who wanted to make open movies, greatly reducing the development costs to "film and plop in some premade special effects". You might occasionally see two movies with similar scenes, but as this grows, it will become less frequent.

  16. Re:Looks like a good one by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you like far fetched hollywood plots that have no basis in reality. Wait, this is slashdot, of course you do!
    Of course! When I see the name John Woo, the only thing I can think of that is better than "far fetched hollywood plot that has no basis in reality" would be "far fetched Hong Kong plot that has no basis in reality." Give me double-fisted gunfights with infinite-capacity ammo clips!

    Alas, as far as I can tell, Woo has left that all behind. But I always hope he'll feel a nostalgic urge...

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  17. a cursed writer by pgjpgj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    PKD has been dead 21 years, doomed in life to being treated like a hack and in death to having his work mutilated by hacks. Hollywood has a knack for picking up only the most superficial details and missing the creepy paranoid subtleties that make the fiction so memorable. Of the half-dozen efforts to date, only "Screamers" (relatively obscure low-budget effort) and parts of "Blade Runner" are even modest approximations of the works upon which they are based. I have low expectations for "Paycheck": one of his earliest short stories, too long and clumsily plotted compared his masterpieces of the 60's and 70's. I fantasize about what a first-rate director could do with "Martian Time Slip", "Man in the High Castle", or especially "A Scanner Darkly". As long as crap star vehicles with the likes of bozos like Affleck continue to get greenlighted, fantasy it will remain.

  18. It's a good one. by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Been a little while since I read it, too, but here's the gist of it:

    A guy works for a large company for a period of time. When he leaves the company, his memory of the entire experience is wiped and he gets the pay he negotiated for himself prior to starting the job. He was expecting a large sum of money, but instead gets a handful of objects. He then proceeds to get into multiple situations where one of the objects is exactly what he needs to get him out of a jam, and eventually he pieces together what he was doing during the period of time that was wiped from his memory.

    It's in Volume 1 of The Collected Stories of Philip K. Dick, featuring "The Short Happy Life of the Brown Oxford."

    ~Philly

  19. Re:Hollywood Hype - False. by Filibustero · · Score: 2, Insightful
    $10 says the footage of him actually reverse engineering anything is less than 5 minutes.

    Then again, who would want to sit there for two hours watching someone reverse engineer things...

    Seeing the trailer though, it looks like a stock action escape movie, with reverse engineering as the flavor-of-the-month.

    Between that and The-Rocky-of-InsertThemeHere, Hollywood never seems to run out of recycling ideas.

    What are some of the best sci-fi flicks you've seen?

  20. and don't forget... by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doves flying in slow motion through flame-engulfed doorways.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  21. Re:Should NOT be advertised on slashdot by krammit · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...I blame Slashdot, I blame ThinkGeek, and I blame everyone and anyone who's ever dramatized actors or rockstars or athletes..."

    I must've missed the ./ headlines that dramatized actors, rock stars and athletes. Let me see if I can guess them:

    RMS: Rock, Music, Sex!
    Darl McBride Wins Oscar for Best Actor
    Linus Torvalds Takes Up Jogging

    I can see why you're upset. I'll wait til the dupe before I pass judgement myself.

    --
    "Watch your cornhole, bud."
  22. Re:Hollywood Hype - False. by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course it's going to be less than 5 minutes. If any actual reverse engineering were done and if it were any longer they'd get charged with violating the DMCA.

  23. Great! by lightcycle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, that sounds like a cool idea. There is of course the machinima genre, but it would be cool to hava a GNU/Movie tool or development environment rather than using game engines, which seem to be a little too limited to really make advanced movies. Does anyone know of any ongoing projects in this direction?

    --

    The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
    in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
  24. Re:Looks like a good one by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But I lost all faith in hollywood when I saw keanu reaves restart some chick's heart in the matrix reloaded,

    How did you feel in "The Matrix" when the chick restarted his heart?

  25. Paycheck, the short story by friscolr · · Score: 5, Informative
    Paycheck, I have it in a 1977 Del Rey Compilation (the cover is a multi-sphered space structure, i think, it's rather worn). It's typical Dick, listed as (c)1953 Greenleaf Publications, Inc, for June 1953 Imagination, and the story reads like many other of his stories from that time period. It's witty, innovative, and, to today's audience, 100% cheesy.

    For reference to other movies, Minority Report was published in 1954, We Can Remember It For You Wholesale (Total Recall) published 1965, Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep (Blade Runner) published 1968, Second Variety (Screamers) published 1953, Impostor published 1953.

    Personally i really enjoy the cheesy wit that most of his short stories are innundated with, and am looking forward to Paycheck, despite my apprehension with Ben Affleck (god, that jaw!).

    If you want to read PKD, i think his best stuff was from the late 60's early 70's. The short stories from the 50's and early 60's feel like quick thoughts that PKD was shooting out on the fly, stuff he was thinking through on his way to later full thoughts. His stories after the mid-70's (there aren't many) are too ethereal and "out there", almost to the point of being unreadable. And for a very different sort of work by PKD, read Confessions of a Crap Artist.

    Disclaimer: I've read a substantial amount of PKD, but as he was such a prolific writer, i've read nowhere near all or even most of his work.

    As for John Woo, I've enjoyed his style in Face/Off and Broken Arrow, and in both he had to overcome the Actor Wraith John Travolta (lately seems to act so bad that he sucks the acting ability out of others). Hell, Hard Target even had some style thanks to John Woo, and it's a Van Damme movie. Presumably he'll be able to work through Ben's jaw as well.

    It's too bad the rumours of John Woo doing a TMNT movie aren't true.

  26. That's not pedantic... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You do need to distinguish between the author of the book the movie was based on, and the people who made the movie itself. Not doing so is lazy and sloppy. And in the case of Blade Runner it's just plain stupid -- nobody who's seen it and also read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? see much of a resemblance between the two. They both had artificial people in them, that's about it.

    I carefully avoid seeing any Steven Spielberg movies, but I'm not persuaded that Ridley Scott is anything brilliant either. Most of the good dialog in Blade Runner was improvised by the actors, who found Scott's klunky script unperformable.

    God, where is Billy Wilder, now that we really need him?

  27. What? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's wrong with letting us know what movies to pirate off the kazzalite?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  28. Reversed Time Periods by Bugmaster · · Score: 5, Funny
    The voice-over in the trailer states that, "in the future", corporations will use reverse-engineering to learn each other's secrets. I think someone in Hollywood has their wires crossed -- because that's what corporations do now.

    A more realistic trailer would involve something like this:

    Voiceover: To learn how something works, you must first take it apart (*). But, in the past, reverse-engineering was outlawed by the megacorporations. Technological innovation has stopped. Now, 20 years in the future, one man strives to revive the old arts...
    Ben Affleck: Hmm. So to tighten the screw, you can only turn it clockwise ! Ingenious !
    Voiceover: But now, he must race against time as corporate forces are closing in...
    Jack-booted thug: Ben Affleck ! You are charged with the violation of DMCA in the first degree. By the powers invested in me by RIAA/MPAA, I pronounce your warranty void !
    Ben Affleck: Aiiieee ! The Fritz Chip ! In my head ! Erasing... memory... Must remember... which... way... screws... turn...
    Voiceover: Will this dangerous criminal be brought to justice ? It is your duty as a consumer to watch this movie NOW and find out. Remember: you belong to the MPAA.

    (*) actual trailer quote

    --
    >|<*:=
  29. Re:Looks like a good one by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Anybody else picture carbon copy-esque remakes of Star Wars with great effects but no acting?"

    Yeah, but that was more of a flashback than a prediction of the future.

  30. Re:Looks like a good one by glenkim · · Score: 2, Funny

    maybe Ben Stiller can work as Ben Affleck's stunt double!

  31. Minor spoiler here by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, this engineer (don't think he was a reverse engineer) gets into a contract with a highly secretive corporation. The deal is that he works for them for like 2 years, gets paid a truckload of cash but gets his entire memory of the experience wiped out.
    The story starts as he wakes up with this 2 years memory blank. He's told that he opted for a handful of trinkets as paycheck instead of the $$ just before undergoing the memory wipe. At first he's pretty pissed off against his former self. But he quickly realizes that some of these trinkets (wire, bus stub, poker chip...) prove incredibly useful.
    It dawns on him that his former self had a master plan in order to (i) survive and (ii) (re)discover a truth worth far more than the $.
    All in all, it's a pretty nice story. The unnerving feeling that he is remote controlled is mitigated by the fact that he is the remote controller. One of the good short stories by Dick. I hope Hollywood doesn't destroy the best ideas like Spielberg did in Minority Report.

    --

    It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  32. Some more details from the book (no spoilers) by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've just (coincidentally) finished this story, from the first (very excellent) collection of P.K.D. short stories, "Beyond Lies The Wub". I've ordered the remaining 4 books in the series on the strength of that.

    The book concentrates on the individual's loss of power in the face of the tension between omnipresent government and big business.

    Our hero, Jennings, an electronics engineer signs a two year contract with Rethrick Industries - a catch being that all knowledge of his two years with them will be surgically removed on leaving. This is pretty much where the story starts.

    On attempting to collect payment at the end of his mysterious contract he is presented instead with a bag of apparently "trinkets": bits of wire, tickets, a broken poker chip etc. He is told that he (before his memory was wiped) supplied the items to be given back instead of the money. He's obviously not pleased.

    However as the story progresses these "trinkets" become far more valuable than money ever could...

    And there I shall stop.

    I enjoyed the story. I'm 3/4 of the way through "Beyond Lies The Wub" and at the end of almost every story I end up thinking "Ooh, XYZ really ripped off some of these ideas for this film or that book".

    What amazes me about Dick is how stories written in the 50's haven't dated, either socially or (often) technologically.

    In "Wub" there is a very interesting preface by Dick himself and some extra context set in a posthumous introduction by Roger Zelanzy a friend of his.

    If you haven't read any of his stuff before (I hadn't) then this collection is a great place to start.

  33. Re:Looks like a good one by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Funny
    How did you feel in "The Matrix" when the chick restarted his heart?

    Simple, Keanu is not human. That part was easily believable.

  34. Re:Looks like a good one by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The real crime here is that yet another PKD story has been twisted beyond recognition
    and in the article: "Written by Phillip K Dick of Blade Runner and Minority Report"

    And where does the "reviewer" get off saying "written by" PKD? He's been dead almost 20 years. "Based very loosely on". If you're going to mention Dick, how about listing some books he actually DID write?

  35. Re:Not Another Dick by Channard · · Score: 3, Funny
    Philip K Dick was the only Science Fiction

    Yeah, I mean there's L Ron Hubbard too...

  36. Oh for the science fiction Alfred Hitchcock... by nanojath · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Really, Blade Runner pulls a fair number of components from the story and world of Do Androids..., but as another has said, Ridley Scotts main accomplishment is his creation of an environment suffused with futuristic ambiance.


    Predictably, what is most absent from both Dick adaptations is the more philosophical edge. In Minority Report in particular the whole issue of the implications of alternate possible futures devolves to a mere plot device.


    And sigh, yes, where IS a director consistently interested in the speculative genre? Spielberg seems to have some designs on that mantle, which is a shame since he's such a ham-handed, cliche driven director. Where's our sci-fi Alfred Hitchcock?

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  37. INternational action star Chow Yun Fat!! by spineboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    He seems to have done quite well, with several US hits that I can think of (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Wires, etc.)

    But you're right, once American producers get ahold of something, it goes thru the comittee process and get's vanillified/homogenized and made into visual wallpaper/mush. That's why you have to avoid the big name releases and see smaller films that have much more character/personality...

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  38. "Since"? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whaddaya mean, since? Hell, Dogma would have been watchable if Smith hadn't gotten incredibly full of himself and decided to leap up and down, screaming "message!" every six and a half minutes. Note to all filmmakers: entertain first and foremost, scratch your pubic "message!" itch later.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  39. in a follow-up aticle by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    After returning to comfirm the facts of the story, we learned that the shooting, were in fact, not what the people who saw the movie wanted to happen to J.Lo and Bens characters, but to J.lo and Ben.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  40. Re:Really? by TaliesinWI · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh sure, I vaguely remember the interview he said it in. Something to the effect of "everyone will see Matrix whether or not Jet Li is in it, so I might as well contribute to my own projects. What would be better, seeing a movie that you were already going to see that has me in it, and that's it, or seeing a movie you were already going to see PLUS a movie with me in it?"

    I mean, he wasn't arrogant about it or anything, but matter of fact. Let's face it, although it would have been cool to see Li as Seraph, would people who weren't going to see the movie suddenly wanted to see it because Li was in it? Li realizes that and figures that if a movie's going to be a draw because he's in it it may as well be a project that isn't already highly anticipated.

  41. Re:Note on Li by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'd be the last to argue that Jet Li's choosing his American roles wisely (although even in HK, while he was in some definite classics, the majority of his movies were crap)

    However, the role of Seraph was fucking embarassing, a real Charlie Chan character. Seraph's good at Kung-Fu, he talks like a fortune-cookie, he hangs around in traditional clothes, and that's about it. The crowd where I saw the movie was maybe 50% Chinese, and the movie got roundly hissed at that point...

    I remember reading, Jet Li was approached, and wasn't happy with the role, so he asked for something like $9 million, which was turned down. Supposedly, he didn't want the role if he was just going to be a small side-character. Michelle Yeoh went through the same negotiations, with the same results.

    I think we're avoiding the deeper issue, that "Matrix Reloaded" was a sorry movie.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.