FreeBSD 4.9 Code Freeze
lewiz writes "FreeBSD Release Engineering have announced that the code freeze in preparation for 4.9-RELEASE (scheduled for 29th September) will begin on 25th August. Also 4.9-RC is tentatively scheduled for 12th September. A full list of dates can be found on the Release Process page."
The SCO is offering licences for the use of 0 and 1 in free bsd, at the low price of $699 per bit, with an increase to $1399 after October 15th.
Sure, no one seems to care now. However, wait until the SCO gestapo starts really trying to nail down their "licensing fees" from users. FreeBSD will see a huge influx of new users, migrating over from Linux.
Overrated / Underrated : Moderation
I'm sure the Linux fanboy base that makes up the core of Slashdot readers are all pleased to hear that another free OS is making progress. I'm sure they will all show up here to show their support as soon as all crusades against Linux and Geekdom in general are brought to an end and Microsoft is destroyed!
:rolleyes:
In the meantime FreeBSD uses will be content to stay out of the limelight while Slashdot fights those terribly important battles.
I, for one, agree here. 4.9-RELEASE isn't really all that exciting. Of course, it's not supposed to be exciting -- it's from the STABLE branch; new and exciting features don't belong in the STABLE branch.
Now, if there was a completely new scheduler or virtual memory system, or a couple data-corruption on unmount bugs, that would be exciting. But in FreeBSD, that sort of thing doesn't get into the STABLE branch.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
The beauty of FreeBSD is that you don't get a new scheduler or VM subsystem in every new 'kernel release' unlike some other OSes I can think of. Only after great lengths of testing, experimentation, and the actual need for the new subsystem does it make it into the tree. And then, it makes it into the -CURRENT tree. Something so complex is never MFC'd, fortunately. I like FreeBSD because it doesn't radically change from release to release. It is just improved.
Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
No, BSD can only asymptotically approach 5.0, or else it will be System V. Count on seeing 4.9.9.9.9 STABLE in the next few years.
taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
Slashcode must have eaten my tags.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
4.9 Release notes showing what is going in/being fixed
Rus
Cheap UK and US VPS
From what I saw, the big news will be PAE (> 4Gb on Intel boxes) support, which good for commercial uses (we have a bunch of 8Gb Linux boxes that use PAE) but not likely a lot of folks have it on the desktop.
Check the FreeBSD open issues list to get a snapshot.
Some of us don't really want our OS to be exciting. Wasn't that an ancient Chinese curse? "May you live in interesting times, and your operating system provide much excitement."
I was wondering, can any of the people who seem to be badmouthing FreeBSD all the time code? If so, have you contributed at least a line of code to making your much beloved Linux better? If so... Wait a minute, I'm talking to myself now.
Seriously though, if you are not contributing in any way, but still think that just being a fan makes you superior to other teams and their fans, you should think about this: the game is not about you, you're just observers and if your team should cease to exist, you wouldn't know what to do with a football to save your life. So put your scarf on, cheer like a good sport, but leave the criticism to those who actually play the game.
There is no Chinese equivalent that I've ever found and others have noted the same.
great now I am responding to a troll,
so I will answer
1. It is dying
-Wrong
2. It has no GUI
-Wrong
3. It is fragmented
-This is a good thing
4. It is associated with SCO
5. It has no games
-Wrong
6. It is run only by geeks
-Um no comment
7. It is unusable by Grandmas
-nor is linux
8. It has fewer than 500 users
-Wrong
9. You can not install it on a pentium
-Nope
10. You cannot apt-get it
-Correct, use have to make; make install