Slashdot Mirror


The Sound of a Black Hole

Snags writes "Astronomers have used the Chandra X-ray Observatory to observe the deepest, lowest-frequency sound waves ever observed. By my calculations, the 'B-Flat 57 octaves below middle-C' has a period of 9.8 million years. Despite arguments that explosions in space movies should be silent, it is legitimate to call these sound waves because at that frequency, particles of space dust can 'see' each other through gravity. These notes are 'over a million billion times deeper than the limits of human hearing', so to call it infra-sound would be a bit of an understatement."

78 comments

  1. That explains! by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Funny

    Infrasound! Now that explains why many people have this irrational fear of black holes! :-)

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:That explains! by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      A black hole has the sound of something sucking...

  2. My vivid imagination... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I read "The Sound of a Black Hole"
    the sound I heard in my mind was "oh shit there's a black hole!"

  3. Bombastic journalism at its worst by pbox · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Infrasound is a sound wave. Black hole infra radiation is not sound at all. It is x-ray...

    --
    Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
  4. Wow - and I thought Germany had a long concert by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    bbc.co.uk

    So this is a 639 year concert that has started in Germany. The concert has been ongoing for 17 months (the initial "quiet period" of the organ filling) however the first three note chord has been hit.

    Boy wish I had that kind of time to waste... Imagine the monks 630 years from now going - "Well, this is over now - what the hell are we going to do now ?"

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Wow - and I thought Germany had a long concert by menscher · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The performance follows a legal case in which composer Mike Batt was forced to pay a six-figure sum to Cage's publishers, who accused him of plagiarising a silent piece of music." And we thought SCO was bad!

    2. Re:Wow - and I thought Germany had a long concert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Imagine the monks 630 years from now going - "Well, this is over now - what the hell are we going to do now ?"

      Bass solo.

    3. Re:Wow - and I thought Germany had a long concert by falsification · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see those damn downloaders try to rip that off!

    4. Re:Wow - and I thought Germany had a long concert by Snags · · Score: 1

      At least it would compress well. Especially if expressed as a MIDI file.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
  5. This would be a "RTFA". It *is* sound. by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 5, Informative
    Read the Space.com link.

    The Perseus cluster is the brightest known in X-rays, making it a good target for study. It has two large, bubble-shaped cavities that extend away from a central black hole. The cavities are formed by jets of material ejected from the black hole's surroundings, and the jets have been suspected of heating the outlying gas. But scientists couldn't see how.

    A special image-processing technique was used to bring out subtle changes in brightness that revealed the presence of ripples -- the sound waves.

    Fabian and Allen figure the sound waves, observed spreading out from the cavities, heat the gas. The amount of energy involved is staggering, equal to what would be produced if 100 million stars exploded.
    They're not saying that infra-radiation is sound--they used the telescope to see ripples in the gas. That's the sound.
  6. GSS by falsification · · Score: 5, Funny
    B-Flat 57 octaves below middle-C

    AKA "a giant sucking sound."

  7. B-Flat 57 octaves below middle-C? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    B-Flat 57 octaves below middle-C, and it's the sound of a black hole. My , they've discovered the brown note!

    Umm, sorry for that...

  8. No matter. by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    My extreme audiophile friend now has to replace his whole system to capture the experience of these new sounds.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:No matter. by mlush · · Score: 2, Funny
      My extreme audiophile friend now has to replace his whole system to capture the experience of these new sounds.

      Make that replace his whole Star system.

  9. It is not sound by node+3 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sound is the word defining that which the ears hear. Is it possible to listen, directly, to that shock wave even if one were standing (floating) in the midst of it? If not, it ain't sound.

    1. Re:It is not sound by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Definition b) courtesy dictionary.com

      sound ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sound)
      b.) Transmitted vibrations of any frequency.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    2. Re:It is not sound by node+3 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Definition (b) is an imprecise usage of the word. The word "sound" came about to describe the phenomena of hearing. There is no sound without hearing.

      Once we learned that sound is transmitted by vibration, we used the word sound to label those vibrations in general. Such usage leads to ambiguity and is primarily useful for describing a general phenomena. If one makes a point to call vibrations in general a sound, and the sound is unhearable, the person is being imprecise.

      It's like calling Bach a classical composer. As a general term, it's correct, but if you make a point that Bach is indeed classical as a precise category, it would be wrong. He was a baroque composer.

      If the poster has simply said that the sound of a black hole was measured, that's a generality, and correct. But instead chose to make a specific point that the vibration was indeed sound, and not just a low, unhearable, vibration.

      Who am I to say the dictionary is wrong? Consider this, according to definition (b), if I shake you, your body's motion is sound, even if it doesn't make a sound. Even a photon is sound, since it is a vibrating particle, transmitting its vibration through space-time.

    3. Re:It is not sound by recursiv · · Score: 2

      I concede defeat.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    4. Re:It is not sound by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Consider this, according to definition (b), if I shake you, your body's motion is sound, even if it doesn't make a sound.

      So? My body's motion in such a case is sound. It may be inaudible. If you managed to shake me stongly and quickly enough, it would be audible to the human ear

      Even a photon is sound, since it is a vibrating particle, transmitting its vibration through space-time.

      Viewed as a particle, a photon does not vibrate. Viewed as a wave, a photon is a vibration, but of EM potential, not of pressure changes in a mechanically linked medium.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:It is not sound by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      To what kind of ears are you referring? Human ears? In that case, this dog whistle I have doesn't produce sound. I sure as hell can't hear it, but when I blow it, my dog goes bonkers. But I guess it's not sound because I do not hear it. Try telling that to my dog.

      Granted, I don't think anybody could hear that noise... but who knows, maybe some alien is bitching to his neighborhood association because that black hole won't turn it down or something.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  10. B-Flat? by higuy48 · · Score: 1

    Why is everything good always in B-flat? The only good B-sharp ever was a Simpsons episode: Homer's Barbershop Quartet. Ah, a classic. Now, where can I find Homer at the Bat?

    --
    And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
    1. Re:B-Flat? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      But isn't B# the same as C?

      Yeah, I know (you?) musicological types like to talk about B sharp or F flat or whatever, but I've never understood why.

    2. Re:B-Flat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of. B# and C are enharmonic when played in equal temperament (and enharmonic in any temperament on the keyboard, barring special keyboards with plenty more than 12keys/octave).

      Keys written with 6 or 7 sharps or flats do exist. You can get away with transposing C# major (7 sharps) as D flat major (5 flats) and stil be enharmonic while doing away with E# and B#. But with say D# minor (6 sharps) or E flat minor (6 flats) you've always got either an E# or C flat respectively in the chosen key. Trust me on this one, there's a very good reason B# is written instead of C natural in the key of C# major (just as an example). It's partly the same reason no-one writes E flat instead of D# for the key of E major. But I've got to go to work now. I'm sure someone will correct me, or at least add to what I've said.

    3. Re:B-Flat? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It depends on the scale you're playing in, if you're not playing in any particular key (just bashing on the keyboard) it doesn't matter which way you call the notes. The third note in a C-minor scale is E flat, and the second note in a C#-major scale is D#, and even so they're the same note. Play it on a piano and you'll see why the different names.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:B-Flat? by Snags · · Score: 1
      To expand on the temperament, each key on a keyboard is a half-step above the previous one. They go in an exponential scale, so that every 12 keys, the frequency is doubled. So each key is 2^(1/12) = 1.0595 times the frequency of the previous key.

      The "fifth" of a note is supposed to be exactly 1.5 times the frequency. But, on a keyboard, the actual note is 2^(7/12) = 1.4983 times the frequency of the fundamental. If you tune an instrument so the 2^(1/12) relationship holds, that's equal temperament. But you could also tune it so the thirds and fifths of the scale notes come out correct. In this case, the B# and C may indeed be slightly different pitches. Also, the tuning is particular to a scale. So the instrument sounds different if it's played in a different scale. A keyboard sounds the same in any scale, hence "equal" temperament.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
    5. Re:B-Flat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the thread starting at the poster who asked about C - B# should be linked to anytime an argument starts about whether or not C/B# or Fx/G are the same. (x - looks like the double sharp symbol for those who didn't know.) :)

  11. Alien by DeltaStorm · · Score: 2, Funny

    In space no once can hear you hum...

    --
    .sdrawkcab si gis siht
  12. lol, your calculations? naughty! by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    "These sound waves are thought to have been produced by explosive events occurring around a supermassive black hole (bright white spot) in Perseus A, the huge galaxy at the center of the cluster. The pitch of the sound waves translates into the note of B flat, 57 octaves below middle-C. This frequency is over a million billion times deeper than the limits of human hearing, so the sound is much too deep to be heard."

    1. Re:lol, your calculations? naughty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you mis-read the original comment. Read again. The calculations mentioned are not the ones you quote, and the writer does in fact put quotation marks around the part that was taken from the original article.

    2. Re:lol, your calculations? naughty! by Snags · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what he said. None of the articles I read actually gave the frequency or the period of the oscillation. They did say it had been going on for a billion years or so.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
    3. Re:lol, your calculations? naughty! by sharpone · · Score: 1

      "In general, the frequency of middle C is between 256 Hz and 280 Hz." And "To find the frequency of a note one octave lower the frequency is halved."
      Seems like a simple enough calculation to me.

      from: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/DanielleDaly.s html

    4. Re:lol, your calculations? naughty! by Snags · · Score: 1

      I went with the middle-A=440 Hz standard. Then, half-step up to Bflat with 2^(1/12), then divide by 2^57 to go down 57 octaves. Flip (1/x) to get the period, and start dividing to convert seconds to years. The original journal article (see another comment) says 9.6 million years, which is actually 0.35 half-steps sharper than Bflat, but still 0.65 half-steps flatter than B, so it's closer to Bflat.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
  13. Concert by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wouldn't buy tickets to a music-playing blackhole concert. They suck.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    1. Re:Concert by danratherfan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know. I liked their one and only album "Songs from the Singularity".

    2. Re:Concert by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      What about
      "Sounds of Silence", for the infra-sound hearing impaired ?

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    3. Re:Concert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They try to keep their music low key.

  14. Satchmo has found his soul home. by brindafella · · Score: 1

    Seems that Satchmo (Louis Armstrong) found his soul home. Of course, there have been other infra-bass singers, too. PRE

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
  15. Satchmo has found his soul home by brindafella · · Score: 1

    Seems that Satchmo (Louis Armstrong found his 'soul home' among the stars... PRE

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
  16. But... but... by Ratface · · Score: 1

    Who have they convinced to sit there holding down the keys for the chord for the next 1.9 years???

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:But... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An organist places weights on the keys.

  17. But does a brown dwarf... by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1


    play the "brown note" ?

  18. On the team by xiox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm on the team that did this. Ask any questions you like!

    1. Re:On the team by FrostedWheat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm on the team that did this. Ask any questions you like!

      Would you like some toast?

      -Talkie Toaster

    2. Re:On the team by Snags · · Score: 1

      What's the error on the frequency of the note?

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
    3. Re:On the team by xiox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good question. If you look at the ripple image (generated by unsharp masking), you'll see the waves aren't perfectly spaced, so there's an error there. We estimate a wavelength of about 11 kpc. You then need the sound speed, which is a function of temperature (about 1170 km/s in gas of about 5 keV). The calculation of the period of 10^7 years is probably a good estimate, but it isn't precise. If you're really interested in the details read the original paper here.

    4. Re:On the team by diegoq · · Score: 1

      What's the frequency in Hz?

      --
      --Tim
    5. Re:On the team by xiox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look, I don't want any toast, and he doesn't want any toast. In fact, no one around here wants any toast. Not now, not ever. No toast!

      Or muffins! Or muffins! We don't like muffins around here! We want no muffins, no toast, no teacakes, no buns, baps, baguettes or bagels, no croissants, no crumpets, no pancakes, no potato cakes and no hot-cross buns and definitely no smegging flapjacks!

    6. Re:On the team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm having spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam, spam and spam.

    7. Re:On the team by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you're a muffin man.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    8. Re:On the team by Mentorix · · Score: 1

      This thread is a friggin' gem... :) Did you cheat or did you actually remember this scene of Red Dwarf by heart?

    9. Re:On the team by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      How can sound travel at 1170km/s through space, but only 340m/s at sea level?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    10. Re:On the team by xiox · · Score: 1

      The gas is actually a plasma (we tend to just call it gas in astronomy, though). It is much less dense than the air (there's only one atom per 10 or 100 cubic cm), and a lot hotter (around 50 million degrees). The atoms are ionised as many of the electrons have been stripped off the atoms.

      Roughly, the speed is so fast as the gas is hot. The particles move much faster and so they propagate any pressure fluctations faster.

  19. alien communications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    In other words: in space, nobody can hear you scream... but they can hear you fart

  20. Do black holes exist? by nimblebrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Black holes rely on an assumption that gravity has no limits on its strength, and to some extent on it following a strict Newtonian curve.

    Thinking of "curves" in space-time is an interesting analogy for gravity, but still doesn't address the mechanism - sure, the planet may be on a "45 degree" incline in spacetime, but what forces it down... and not up? You would nearly have to posit the existence of some constant stream of gravitons coming at 'right angles' to three-dimensional space in order to actually push things 'down the well'.

    There are alternate corpuscular (i.e. caused by particles; "quantum") models of the mechanism of gravity. There's the LeSagian model, with modern reworks that range from the bizarre-yet-possible theories of Tom Van Flandern, to the more "moderate" theories of Paul Stowe explaining how the "drag" factor that detractors expect doesn't show up, in exactly the sort of way that Feynman expressed it for electromagnetism.

    The LeSage-type theories are, in general, "push" theories, which operate in a medium filled with gravitons (just as space is filled with photons) that are deflected/absorbed near bodies and cast 'shadows' that create a low "pressure" area close to surfaces and, to a lesser extent, between bodies.

    The formulae calculate out approximately to Newton's/GR's gravity equation, but with some interesting exceptions:

    • There is a stronger fall-off at greater distances, which limits the effective range of gravity (surprisingly, this reduces the need for 'dark matter' to keep galaxies in the shape they're in)
    • Inside denser and denser bodies, graviton absorption reaches a point where matter on the inside hardly contributes at all (a complete gravity "shadow")

    This upper limit on the strength of gravity may prevent the ultimate collapse that black hole theory requires.

    Black holes are still a theoretical construct. Even the jets, now often taken as a 'sign' of a black hole, are still a largely unexplained phenomenon, one that is also associated with accretion disks for newly-forming stars.

    So if something's singing in that cloud, it may not be as dense as it's accused of being.

    I apologize for all the jargon. I shall go read another thread on SCO as just punishment :)

    --
    Binary geeks can count to 1,023 on their fingers :)
    1. Re:Do black holes exist? by Bonker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thinking of "curves" in space-time is an interesting analogy for gravity, but still doesn't address the mechanism - sure, the planet may be on a "45 degree" incline in spacetime, but what forces it down... and not up? You would nearly have to posit the existence of some constant stream of gravitons coming at 'right angles' to three-dimensional space in order to actually push things 'down the well'.

      The best explantion for this I've ever heard deals entirely with special relativity and never touches quantum mechanics. The author I read (Epstein) discusses what he calls 'Slow Time'. An object is always moving in four dimenions, even if it appears at rest to an observer, because it is moving forward in time as well. Since all dimensions of space and time are warped by the presence of matter, and not just space, if the object being observed is closer to a source of gravity (on a steeper part of the curve of space-time), he will start to experience time shortening or time dialation sooner and more strongly than you, the observer. His straight-line path through time starts to curve toward the source of gravity. This time-dialation acts as a vector force to 'push' him towards the source of gravity.

      You can read more about the interperatation of Special Relativity in this book: Relativity Visualized

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Do black holes exist? by krysith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't a stronger fall off at greater distances actually go against the data we have for anomalous gravitational effects? If anything, both cosmological ("dark matter") and experimental data point to gravity being stronger than Newton at long distances.

      See also:
      "Study of the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11", Anderson, J.D., Laing, P.A., Lau, E.L., Liu, A.S., Nieto, M.M., and Turyshev, S.G., Physics Review D, v65, 082004, (2002)

    3. Re:Do black holes exist? by nimblebrain · · Score: 1

      The attenuation of gravity, according to one of the papers I ran across is about a kiloparsec, or about 3,300 light years from each single source.

      It can help get around the apparent contradiction that intact spiral galaxies present.

      Regardless, the attenuation is one of the predictions of one of the theories, and can be used to prove or disprove it. Currently, very little resources are being expended on such observations. Even Majorana's careful gravity shielding experiments have not yet been redone.

      Other LeSagian-type theories make no such assertion at a distance, but still modify the Newtonian equation for the insides of bodies. They establish upper and lower bounds on the strength of gravity with a 'weak' solution (negligible graviton absorption) to a 'strong' solution (complete graviton absorption).

      Gravity at long distances is still open to interpretation. You have some of the more recent cosmological theories posit cosmos-wide antigravity to 'speed up the expansion of the universe', and other more mundane Big Bang interpretations assuming that the universe is flying apart, there's the "Great Attractor" purportedly pulling us towards it, but is still red-shifted.

      As to the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer probes, there's another potential explanation with some good links to various other explanations.

      We're unfortunately a bit hamstrung in that we can rarely ever see phenomena happen, so a lot of interpretation of what we see - and those are what frequently get overturned.

      On a more personal note, I'm just a little shocked at how much the 'party line' is expected to be followed in most fields of physics. In biology, there's not nearly the same embarrassment about being wrong, and it's a vibrant field. In physics, most work outside of quantum physics and computing seems (on a relative scale) practically dead.

      So, a special plea from me to revive the field.

      ("No, sir, it's not dead, it's resting" :)

      --
      Binary geeks can count to 1,023 on their fingers :)
    4. Re:Do black holes exist? by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

      Thinking of "curves" in space-time is an interesting analogy for gravity, but still doesn't address the mechanism - sure, the planet may be on a "45 degree" incline in spacetime, but what forces it down... and not up?

      That is the wrong question. Curvature is an intrinsic property of any spacetime; unless you are standing on something, there is no notion of down, up, or 45 degree incline. These notions arise only when using simplified "rubber-sheet" analogies to describe the effect of mass on the geometry nearby.

      You would nearly have to posit the existence of some constant stream of gravitons coming at 'right angles' to three-dimensional space in order to actually push things 'down the well'.

      This is meaningless. General relativity is a purely geometric theory, and says absolutely nothing about gravitons. It would be nice if people trying to poke holes in relativity (e.g. van Flandern) took the time to understand what it actually predicts.

      Incidentally, do any of these alternative theories predict the proper precession of Mercury's orbit, or the timing adjustment for clocks on the GPS satellites? General relativity does. This page might be useful to people who haven't seen these sorts of debates before.

      --
      "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
  21. I though the sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... was identical to that sound Anna Nicole makes when eating spagetti.

    (Badum-bum *crash*)

    Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week.

    Please remember to tip your waiters.

  22. Re:B-Sharp? by Snags · · Score: 1

    I think it comes in useful when dealing with instruments whose key is not C. It makes transposing the key easier. In the final form, I guess they would be converted to the "actual" notes.

    --
    main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
    LN2 is cool!
  23. Re:This would be a "RTFA". It *is* sound. by xiox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's right. We see the ripples as X-ray emission is very sensitive to gas density (goes like density squared), so we see the dense regions where the gas is being compressed by the sound wave. The picture is a "snapshot" as we never see the wave move.

  24. Brown Note by kev0153 · · Score: 1

    Is this the Brown Note. Is it real?

  25. Energy and sound by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the energy associated with these sound waves are. It's got to be rather sizeable, right? I'm too far out of college to remember all my energy equations but still retaining enough to be curious.

    In a simplistic level, think of a stereo's tweeter speaker...short soundwaves that just hurt the ears if turned up too high. Then you've got the bass...longer soundwaves that you can feel the "punch". So I wonder what these soundwaves from the black holes are capable of doing. They've got to have some sort of impact on moving objects in space. Anyone care to explain any more about this?

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Energy and sound by xiox · · Score: 1

      We expect the waves to dissipate most of their energy in the inner 100 kpc (~300,000 light-years) of the cluster (if you look at the published images, that's about the region you see). The idea is this heating effect may be able to balance the cooling of the gas in the core of the cluster. Stopping the cooling means that the central galaxy doesn't grow much bigger.

      We expect the actual sound amplitude to be similar to that produced by a human voice!

    2. Re:Energy and sound by xiox · · Score: 1

      I should add the even though the sound is as loud as a human voice, as it travels over a massive volume, there are very large amounts of energy involved.

      You need massive amounts of energy to heat the centre of a cluster and stop it cooling (an estimate is 10^36 erg/s).

    3. Re:Energy and sound by Snags · · Score: 1

      One of the authors posted a link to the original paper. They say that the amplitude of the ripples is about 20-30% of the X-ray brightness. I don't know what density variations that corresponds to, but it sounds huge. The amount of energy carried by the wave would be correspondingly huge.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
  26. Whoops! by xiox · · Score: 1

    Make that 10^36 Joules per s

  27. Chandra images by vvdd2 · · Score: 1
  28. More pictures by slavitos · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the Harvard link! Here are some more images from Space.com. This one is a composite photo. of the images picked up by the various types of telescopes.

  29. Soundcard capable of recording this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if there is a sound card under $50 that can record these black hole sounds? Can I just use the "line-in" on my puter? Should I encode them to WMA? Thanks!

  30. Frequency by xiox · · Score: 1

    The period of the wave is 9.6 million years. A quick calculation (haven't checked my sums) suggests the frequency is about 3.3 x 10^-15 Hz (or 0.0000000000000033 Hz)

  31. Emotions by vertigoalopolus · · Score: 1

    Maybe the chills and sensations we feel that we assume are ghosts, are the interferance patterns from many blackhole wavefronts?

    --
    Dont ask me, im just the bass player!
  32. So... by Royster · · Score: 1

    ...if a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, it dosn't make a sound since sound implies someone heard it.

    I suppose it fillows that there is no such thing as ultrasound and the images I have of my daughter in utero were fradulent.

    Sound is periodic vibrations due to compression waves in a medium. Within a certain range of frequencies, sound can be heard (if it is loud enough) outside of those frequencies, we still call it sound even if no one can hear it. That's what we're talking about here.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  33. B Flat by Aspasia13 · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you were in a black hole, you'd B Flat too!

  34. Understatement? . . . . by donob · · Score: 1

    Or . . . . Infrastatement?

  35. A force, or merely curved spacetime? by d3m057h3n35 · · Score: 1

    I don't know too much about the physics of gravity (yet), at least mathematically, beyond F=Gm1m2/d^2. However, my interpretation of general relativity was that a collection of mass (or energy) moves inertially through spacetime, that is, without inherent acceleration, and the acceleration we see occurs because the object is following the topology of space as it goes along. If spacetime is curved, the shortest distance between two points is some sort of curve.

    That's why I think the term "gravity well" is particularly illuminating; energy/mass moves inertially through curved space time until it finds its way into a state of equilibrium, the highest local curvature of space possible, just as if a marble in a well is going to stay at the bottom. It also explains a little why an object at the midpoint between two equal masses (assume no other mass around) is in unstable equilibrium: imagine a marble on the very tip of a hill in this case.

    Gravity resists integration with the other 3 fundamental forces, and maybe this is because it is not a *force*. Perhaps there really is no gravitic force carrier... Curved spacetime is simply a more elegant concept.

    ~Demosthenes

  36. The sound of a black Tupac dying by Spooge+Knight · · Score: 1

    WHEN I SHOT HIM