Slashdot Mirror


Wind River To Stop Selling BSD/OS

David writes "According to an article on Bsdnewsletter.com, OS company Wind River has said it will be stopping sales of BSD/OS on this December 31st, and product support exactly one year thereafter. Only 15 more weeks to grab the final 5.1 update before this piece of history might be gone forever..."

57 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. So it is confirmed then? by Sevn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Couldn't resist. Much love for FreeBSD btw.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:So it is confirmed then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No.. notice this is BSD* not *BSD. :)

    2. Re:So it is confirmed then? by j4k3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah maybe Wind River will flow into Walnut Creek. Yort!

  2. Idea to rename the last BSD/OS version by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... move the slash left one character.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: What do you call a gathering of BSD enthusiasts?

    A: A funeral.

  4. Hardly any BSD users used BSD/OS, anyway- by jerkface · · Score: 3, Funny

    or at least, this is consistent with the number of usenet posts.

  5. Re:Stop selling WHAT? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should rename it to BSD/OA.

  6. Okay, okay... by c0dedude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before we all go off on the *bsd is dying trip, let's look at the actual statistics, from Netcraft. This survey is current. Thanks.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Okay, okay... by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Funny

      The "bsd is dying" rumours are taking on a life of their own.

      It's almost as bad as the "Apple is dying" nonsense that's been going on since 1984.

      But wait a minute...Apple's OSX runs a BSD variant....omg! IT's TRUE! IT'S TRUE!!!!

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    2. Re:Okay, okay... by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 3, Funny
      It is now official - Netcraft has confirmed: "*BSD is dying" is dying

      Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered "*BSD is dying" community when the latest Netcraft survey plainly stated that *BSD accounts for nearly 2 million active sites, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. The "*BSD is dying" trolls are collapsing in complete disarray.

      Fact: "*BSD is dying" is dead

    3. Re:Okay, okay... by PONA-Boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...because he dodges bullets, Avi.

      --
      +that's funny...I don't FEEL tardy.+
  7. That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slightly less than 10 years ago, I was invited to visit BSDI HQ - a very nice house in Colorado Springs. This was before they moved to the "real" office space a few miles away.

    The whole house was wired up for geekiness. They had terminals in various places and plenty of computers. The AV room had massive speakers, a projection screen, and tons of components. Outside, there was a RCA DSS dish, which had been on the market for less than a year as I recall.

    In one of the hallways there were a few gold CDs of various releases in picture frames. At the time, they were still working on the 2.0 release (first one called BSD/OS as opposed to BSD/386, if I remember correctly), so there were only a couple up there.

    They certainly seemed to have their business affairs in order. Now here it is and their company has been eaten by another, and now the former flagship product is being killed.

    I shut down my last BSD/OS system almost 4 years ago and moved to Slackware, so it won't affect me. I just wonder what happened to them when things were obviously quite good at one time.

    1. Re:That was quick by Tim+Fraser · · Score: 2

      Back in 1997 my workplace was essentially an all-BSD/OS shop. We had a source license, and I think it's fair to say that all of us who hacked around in it admired the BSD/OS kernel for its stability and clean code.

      Unfortunately, a year or so later Windows NT swept down upon our group like a plague of management-mandated locusts. When the dust settled, our BSD/OS desktops were gone. I was sitting in front of a windows NT workstation, trying to convince myself that the SCO X server I had duct-taped on top of it was as good as the real thing.

      But through it all, our humble BSD/OS fileserver continued chugging along. That thing was rock-solid. It exceeded 1 year of continuous uptime on at least two occasions while I was working there, brought down only by power failures.

      Thanks for all the good bits, BSDi!

      - Tim

  8. BSD Dead? by markalanj · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have to disagree that BSD itself is dead. Maybe what was once BSDI yes but not BSD in general. Personally I prefer using FreeBSD for serving over Linux. Its stable,consistant and the ports collection rocks! Sure its not for everyone and it maybe dead in the mainstream but its heart still beats for those geeks who want a geeks os.

    1. Re:BSD Dead? by TWX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never seen proof that Linux isn't a geeks' OS, considering the difficulty in getting mainstream people to accept that yes, something useful can still be done at the command line...

      From a users' perspective, there should be almost no functional difference between using a BSD machine, a Linux machine, and a commercial UNIX (Sun, HP-UX, etc) machine. All of the differences that I have seen have been in adminstration. So, even if BSD is dying, Admins will be the only ones to really notice.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:BSD Dead? by Quill_28 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny you say that, i choose freebsd over linux because it was easier.

  9. SMP by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 3, Interesting

    BSD/OS had some kick ass SMP support. They were also great live support. Terrible package support, but that was the worst of it.

    --

    --
    "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  10. Seemed obvious by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like only a year ago when Wind River took over BSD/OS and made lots of lavish praises and promises but, I think everyone knew that this would be the final result. Frankly I never fully understood why Wind River picked it up in the first place.

    In any case, I do not feel that this is a significant loss. The major BSD development is happening in FreeBSD and NetBSD, BSD/OS was never a strong contender.

    None the less, this does clearly demonstrate what happens to software that is owned by closed source companies.

  11. Not dead, just homeless. by niko9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    BSD is not dead, it's just homeless for the time being.

    Please expect this fine OS to be smelling a bit ripe at your nearest highway exit ramp with a sign that says "Will boot for partition space".

  12. Commercial Arm by cplater · · Score: 4, Informative

    BSD/OS was the commercial version of the BSD world. A few years ago there was a push to bring it up to date with the current FreeBSD at the time. Hopefully this will allow more focus on the *BSDs. I'm a real *BSD fan, but I wasn't even aware that this was still around, or even being actively developed.

    --
    -- Charles A. Plater
    1. Re:Commercial Arm by AntiBasic · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you're a BSD fan yet know so little about recent history? To be accurate, BSDI merged with Walnut Creek, changed its name to BSDi and donated the prototype BSDi BSD/OS 5.0 kernel code to the FreeBSD Project.

  13. Ah, the memories... by secolactico · · Score: 5, Interesting

    BSDi... my first hacked server.

    No, I didn't hack it... It was the first server I admin'd that got hacked (circa 1997).

    I was a network guy in those days and somehow inherited the admin of that machine (running Livingston Radius!) and managed via unrestricted telnet.

    All of my unix experience came from having installed Redhat *once* as a lark, but since in the land of the blind the man with one eye is king, I was it.

    I remember seeing all those funny named process in the top display, doing a search on Altavista and then begining to panic.

    Eventually we switched over to FreeBSD and Solaris and my interest in unix (and hopefully, my knowledge) grew from there.

    --
    No sig
    1. Re:Ah, the memories... by lannygodsey · · Score: 2, Informative

      While in high school, I helped start an ISP. My friends father put up the money and away we went. After the SunOS (BSD! not Solaris) machine got to be slow (around 1993), we decided to try a couple cheap Pentium 66/75 machines (~~$2500). We used an SLS distribution w/ kernel 0.99 and we were pretty happy with it. Along the way we upgraded to Slackware and around the time of kernel 1.2.8 we were cracked.
      Why on earth would someone crack and trash a system? There goes the neighborhood.
      We switched the machines to Solaris 2.5 x86 (If I recall, it was $700/machine for the license) but you got great stuff including a Windows 3 emulator!
      Being a BSD fan, the only thing I really liked about Solaris was /usr/ucb (*chuckle*).
      While Solaris was O.K., I had also become adicted to the Free Software Concept. (Side Note, my favorite computers were Amiga and I loved Fred Fish Disks. The Software Distillary BBS was my favorite BBS :) )
      After talking to a few people at a HAM RADIO FEST, I picked up FreeBSD which is what all our machines (save a few linux machines for customers who want to run linux for one reason or another).
      So, since 1995 we've had two problems, one was that restoring from a QIC tapes on 2.2 series was REALLY SLOW, so the drive upgrade we thought would last an hour, turned into 8. The second problem was insecure file permissions (our fault).
      FreeBSD has been a champ, I don't really care about FreeBSD vs OpenBSD vs Linux, I care about how it works.
      up 301+16:24, 0 users, load 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
      up 502+12:47, 2 users, load 0.08, 0.20, 0.17
      up 612+23:09, 0 users, load 0.02, 0.03, 0.00
      As you can see, I haven't been woken up in the middle of the night w/ THE SERVER IS DOWN for at least a year. Yes, that's what I care about. It works and works and works.
      FreeBSD makes me look good :)

  14. Speaking from ignorance here... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is Wind River really an "OS company" or are they a "CD pressing and distribution company?"

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Speaking from ignorance here... by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wind River is an embedded OS company. Their main OS vxWorks is used by many major vendors of things like switches, routers, PBXs and who knows what else.

    2. Re:Speaking from ignorance here... by Alinraz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Primarily an embedded OS and tools company. They sell VxWorks (OS), the Vision* (...Probe, ...ICE, ...Click) products, SNiFF+ (A code management/editor/analysis package that rocks and runs on Linux), and Diab (embedded compiler).

      We use several of their products at my company to develop MCF5407 systems. Not that I'd buy WR products again though...

      Actually, they're really a "aquire and kill" company...over the last several years they've gone on a major aqusions binge, and many of the products of companies they've aquired (mostly competitors, and often with superior products) they've either let stagnate or killed outright.

    3. Re:Speaking from ignorance here... by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 3, Interesting
      WindRiver sells abominations like the DIAB compiler and operating systems like VxWorks. VxWorks isn't too bad. It's mostly POSIX-compliant, and has some nice features, though you'll sink a boatload of money into licensing. WindRiver also used to sell pSOS, a non-POSIX operating system that is pure hell to build embedded applications with. They're still trying to migrate a lot of their customers from pSOS to VxWorks.

      There are very few reasons, from a technical perspective, to use proprietary operating systems instead of GNU. Especially with the new Linux 2.6 kernel (with pseudo-real-time capabilities and the uCLinux MMU-less additions), there are more and more reasons to move away from proprietary RTOS for most embedded applications.

      --
      ...just my 2 gil.
    4. Re:Speaking from ignorance here... by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, they're really a "aquire and kill" company

      I prefer SCO's policy of "Aquire and Rape" to WindRiver's more liberal leanings.

    5. Re:Speaking from ignorance here... by yanestra · · Score: 4, Interesting
      There are very few reasons, from a technical perspective, to use proprietary operating systems instead of GNU. Especially with the new Linux 2.6 kernel
      You might want to have a look at this paper, especially the part with the pathological test cases for the Linux scheduler.
  15. The full letter by knobee · · Score: 5, Informative

    you can find the full announcement here. Alan Clegg -- Formerly abc@bsdi.com

    --
    Whatever.
  16. The article should be titled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    BreakingWind River.

    Just a little cubicle humor.

  17. Who used BSD/OS? by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm not looking for a hand count -- I'm wondering where BSD/OS saw the biggest deployments.

    Was BSD/OS popular before the free BSDs? I see on their site that they have some information about embedding BSD/OS -- is there a piece of hardware we might all know about, or is it more for internal hardware projects?

  18. It's important to keep perspective here by RLiegh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BSDi was NEVER a free (speech or beer) product, and as such really has and had no impact on the free software community. So, while another (some might say 'useless') proprietary software company goes down the shithole, it does not affect the free software movement in any signifigant way.

    Free and Net BSD will continue to serve our community alongside of Linux as always, completely unaffected by today's announcement.

    1. Re:It's important to keep perspective here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you forget OpenBSD sir!

      Also, BSDi has given code up to open source in the past, the BSD auth system being the largest of these contributions.

  19. What about F5 BigIP and 3DNS? by nutznboltz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about F5 BigIP? It used to run on NetBSD but they needed a commerical OS so they moved on. F5's 3DNS version 3.x ran on FreeBSD, but they migrated it to BSDi in version 4.0.

    I wonder if they will try to maintain BSD/OS themselves or migrate back?

    1. Re:What about F5 BigIP and 3DNS? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the company paid $80K for it.

      Who cares? The value of hardware depreciates very quickly. When Intel processors were at about 100MHz, 500MHz Alpha machines were going for $100,000. Now, you can grab them for $300.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  20. Where's it go? by Endareth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So anyone know what will happen to the source? Any chance of it being released into the Open Source community? I'm sure some of it would benefit other *NIXes out there.

    --
    Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    1. Re:Where's it go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So anyone know what will happen to the source?

      it will probably be copied into the linux kernel.

    2. Re:Where's it go? by fmayhar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I very strongly suspect that there's nearly zero chance that BSD/OS will be open-sourced. While the developers (hi, guys!) might want to do that, Wind River the company has shown itself, I think, to be pretty unfriendly to the open-source community. Just look at how the FreeBSD guys got the shaft in 2001.

      As for the extinction of BSD/OS, well, when I heard a rumor that it was coming, I credited that rumor pretty strongly. When WR came along to buy us (I worked for BSDi at the time) I was skeptical of the future of BSD/OS there. One word: PSOS. So this news comes as no surprise at all.

      The real nasty in this, though, is what it does to the development team. I haven't heard yet what is going on with them, but I doubt that it will be anything good. It could be that Mike, Pat, Peter, Geert Jan and I were just the first to get pink slips, though...

  21. Re:Stop selling WHAT? by dcstimm · · Score: 4, Funny

    hehe I thought their name was WIN DRIVER when I saw the website windriver aka wind river. I thought it was some microsoft product....

  22. Re:What A Surprise by Chromodromic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why should I pay for something I can download for free?

    That's fairly subtle, considering the events of the last day or so. Bravo, and, I think, a point well made.

    There are differences, of course, between publicly consumed intellectual property, like music, and sector-targeted intellectual property, like software: Differences in support requirements, public perception of traditional ownership and rights, the respective industries' take on enforcement and public relations, and the kinds and scope of typical license infringement.

    But ... It's still a good point, so I'm a little disappointed that you're not modded up ...

    --
    Chr0m0Dr0m!C
  23. I still love BSDi by StudentAction.CA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here at work we still have 20+ BSDi machines. We started back in the 1.x days (still have the manuals somewhere.....) and have kept with it ever since. Over the years, we've had to do some custom hacks to fix some OSS software (Cyrus IMAP, just to mention one) but for the most part it is still a rock solid OS with the only downtime being when BSDi released a kernel mod that needed a reboot.

    Of couse now we are moving to FreeBSD and Linux, but it's sad to see an old friend reach the end of it's life. There were a lot of great things in BSDi (like the IPFW firewall syntax - it rocks) but I guess all good things must come to an end.

    Fiarwell, my old friend.

    --
    Driven by 100% sarcasm - fueled by the need to be heard.
  24. Re:What A Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why should I pay for something I can download for free?

    (Sorry to respond to this troll but I feel I must)

    You shouldn't -- if you want the program you're using to die, that is. Volunteer OSS projects needs funding; after all, people have to eat and pay the bills you know! Everyone who wants OSS to suceed to should, as often as is possible, either buy physical items (like cdrom's manuals and the like) or donate money to keep the project(s) alive. It's in your best interest if you use the software, and it's also fair to the authors. An exception to this would be if a project is already well-funded (quite rare) for instance if IBM was paying every kernel hacker a decent salary to work on the kernel.

    Voluntary donations drive so many of our most precious social services, like charities, public television and radio, and Free Software. Hopefully in the future it will drive artists to produce music. I've always wanted a p2p program that would have a button on the side when you're downloading a song that says "click here to give $1 to the artist.".. but that's going a little off-topic.

  25. It had one heydey... by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember the Gauntlet firewall? One of the first firewalls commercial firewalls, and one that you got the source for (it was not open source in the sense that you couldn't distribute source).

    Anyway, make a long story short. Gauntlet ran Solaris, HP-UX, and BSDI, because it actually modified the kernal and several peripheral systems to make it more secure.

    Well, it was geared to a specific release of BSDI. I suspect this was one of the big sellers, and when Gauntlet essentially died of old age (and a company that had no interest in keeping its customers), BSDI lost a big chunk of the market.

    Then you add the rise of the really "Free" BSD's and Linux, and that pretty much ended it.

    But I'll say that BSDI was one of the most robust, forgiving, stable platforms I ran; a fortune 1000 company ran its entire email gateway systems on a pair of BSDI 4.x boxes running a customized FWTK proxy. They only reason it was retired was because the new guys were only Windows literate and BSDI scared them.

    Anyway, I can't say enough good things about BSDI.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:It had one heydey... by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 5, Interesting
      BSDI were the folks who sat down with the FreeBSD developers and basically said, "Here -- these are all of our SMP secrets." From the FreeBSD SMP mailing list, this was instrumental in FreeBSD 5.0 becoming the SMP uberbeast it is, well beyond what just unraveling the macro kernel lock was accomplishing.

      At one point, I seem to recall that Wind River were acquiring Walnut Creek or otherwise taking on the publication of FreeBSD. Whatever happened to that? It seems like they poured blessings all over FreeBSD, then didn't reap the benefits of resultant FreeBSD's growth.

  26. Par for the course by El · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was obvious from the beginning that Wind River bought BSD, just like it bought pSOS, not to obtain new technology, but rather to eliminate another competitor to VxWorks. (What other technologies has Wind River done this to?) Unfortunately, embedded Linux seems to be ruining Wind River's plans to become the Microsoft of the embedded world.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Par for the course by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wind River Systems made the following acquisitions and sales:

      In May 2000, they bought AudeSi for $40,000,000 and Norwegian company ICESoft for $25,000,000

      In April 2001, they bought the software assets of Berkeley Software Design Inc.

      There's an interesting quote from Business Week at this time.

      owning the assets of an open-source software company doesn't guarantee gaining access to the talent of programmers in the open-source community

      Rather not surprisingly, in January 2002, they sold FreeBSD

      From Algonet: Diab Data was bought by ISI who in turn were bought by Wind River Systems. EST Corporation were also bought out by Wind River Systems.

      I guess Wind River Systems were just trying to expand to fill their niche market.

    2. Re:Par for the course by clf8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, they did purchase a lot of companies a few years back. Diab and SingleStep allowed them to own the entire tool chain from compiler to debugger. They've been integrating these into their IDE in an attempt to provide an entire solution. They may have gotten pSOS or BSD to kill them, but don't forget there's also money in support.

      Personally, I started using VxWorks almost 10 years ago and always considered it a decent OS. Sure, it's just one big memory space, but in a lot of ways it's a good solid scalable embedded operating system. Are you gonna put it on your PC, hell no. But it's hella good in telecom applications, and anything else that isn't going to need a pretty GUI. Oh yeah, and it supports IPv6 already.

      I wouldn't count WindRiver out. With the some of the acquisitions they've made, the embedded Linux people will need some of their hardware and software just for debugging. They may end up being niche players, but they'll still have a share of the pie.

    3. Re:Par for the course by k8to · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, because of all the embedded development sales opportunities that were going towards BSDI??

      Let's review. Was BSDI a highly successful embedded operating system? Was BSDI known for being used in realtime and/or small-scaled operating environments across tens of architectures?

      Answers: No, no, and no.

      Aside: pSOS was bought for tools and customer acquisition. It was a buyout ISI was actively interested because their company was taking on water rapidly. I mean, sure, WRS wouldn't mind eliminating competitors, but that's not how it happened.

      Back to BSDI. It's a server OS. Sure, as technology marches onward, what was designed for minicomputers (BSD for VAX) becomes more appropriate for embedded. But where was the developer support for using BSDI in an embedded fashion? The company wasn't laying the groundwork for it. They were focusing on the networking appliance market. The code wasn't generally available either. People who wanted to do BSD with embedded were, as far as I know, using NetBSD. Wasabi, for example, was a customization and consulting group for doing embedded and custom network work with the NetBSD base.

      So if BSDI wasn't a competitor, why were they bought? Three reasons: First, VxWorks used the BSD network stack, but their codebase wasn't meeting customer needs (TCP use changes in 10 years.. shock), while the BSDI base had been significantly enhanced. Second, BSDI/FreeBSD had some good talent who know their way around such things. Third, Linux was the rising threat in embedded (the storm surge sagged a bit with the dotcom collapse, though it's still around), and developing BSD expertise was seen as a counter to this. BSD isn't GPL, so some more real concerns in the embedded space go away, and well, there weren't any great embedded Linux companies to buy at the time. Besides, I think the nerds over there were kind of BSD-biased, being old crusty types.

      --
      -josh
  27. Re:huh? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'd just like to say that BSD isn't going anywhere.

    That's the point. BSD is dying.

    *ducks quickly*

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  28. Japanese BSD by kyoko21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just came back from a two month business trip in Japan. From what I saw in their bookstore was that there were several BSD magazines with 5.1 that comes with the magazines. I didn't see too many linux magazines though. Maybe the Japanese prefer BSD. Any Japanese slashdot readers out there?

    1. Re:Japanese BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are at least three major monthly Japanese Linux magazines (with cds) plus frequent "How-to" magazines. In fact, the Turbo-Linux box version was actually outselling Windows 98 before XP went on sale. Besides Turbo-Kinux, RedHat has a localized boxed distribution and Debian and others are well-known too.

      BSD is certainly used here, but Linux is much more popular and better known to the public. Of course, Windows and Office is still the default for most people and businesses, though.

  29. Re:This is offtopic, but I have to ask by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Informative
    I don't get it, please, someone enlighten me.

    This is a running joke that has been going on for a very long time. BSD's imminent death has been greatly exaggerated more than once, and this joke is poking fun at that fact.
    On Slashdot, this has evolved into a troll, which you can find information about in quite a few places.

    Everything2 has some general information on "BSD is dying".

    Wikipedia has this to say about BSD is dying:

    *BSD is dying
    Quite frequently (especially for BSD-related stories) a comment will be posted providing dubious statistics and many links detailing the forthcoming death of the BSD operating system. With its bogus statistics and inflammatory language the original "*BSD is dying" troll was enormously successful, and was still guaranteed to generate responses years after it first appeared. Unsurprisingly many variants of this troll were created: Slashdot/VA Linux/Linux/Beos/Apple is dying. None were as successful as the original.
    These sites claim that "BSD is dying" is purely a Slashdot trolling phenomenom.

    I'm not convinced that this is the case, however, because there are some earlier examples of this joke (not the troll necessarily, but off-color remarks).
    The earliest reference I can find was in 1992, and may be one explaniation of the phenomenom: Responses to survey on the death of BSD
    There was an article in an online magazine in 1999 that said some disparaging things about BSD's license that may have something to do with phenomenom.
    I could not find the article, but it is mentioned here: Debian wants to use FreeBSD kernel

    There is also a * is dying page.

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  30. Re:Stop selling WHAT? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm still waiting for FreeBDSM. We've already got the devil mascott...

  31. *BSD is alive and kicking, news at eleven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess it's time to say a few words as a past member of the BSD/OS development team.

    Wind River had trouble dealing with the BSD thing for a long time. Keep in mind that their aim was *embedded* stuff, not the UNIX we all know and love.
    In that regard, their announcement is just a move back to a market Wind has been more successful in.

    I, too, knew the end was coming when I was one of the five people that received a pink slip in January, and I was (and I still am) worried about what happens to the people left behind. I hope they do well; some have troube dealing with the loss of something they've worked on for a decade or more.

    Of the five that have left, many have found a new place, but some are still looking. If you're looking for some *real* good folk, ping them. (I work at a leading Dutch security company now).

    I've had a *wonderful* 6 years at BSDI/Wind, and would like to thank the people I've worked with (including customers) for making it happen.

    BSD development will continue, it will just happen elsewhere. May the source be with you.

    Geert Jan

  32. BSD/OS dead by corbosman · · Score: 2, Informative

    BSD/OS has actually been in a coma for quite some time. Shutting down life support is the only fair thing to do.

    We used to run BSD/386 back in 1992 and used BSD/OS upto about 4.1. Around that point BSD/OS started to lag behind in the fast pace of development, but most importantly, in support. When you pay tens of thousands of dollars for licenses with no visible return you tend to start looking for alternatives.

    We switched our whole ISP (now around 600 servers) to FreeBSD with little hassle.

    It's a shame though, BSD/OS had some cool people behind it.

    Cor

  33. *BSD isn't dead in Japan. by ui9872 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Japan, *BSD (especially FreeBSD) is very popular.
    You can see BSD Magazine and much more