Slashdot Mirror


Digital Ink On Billboards

cdneng2 writes "The New York Times has this article on a revolutionary new billboard. It uses digital ink, versus the typical CRT, LCD, Neon, or Plasma displays that are so prominent on the newer billboards that wastes electricity. From the article: 'By creating a paste made of tiny helix-shaped particles that can be minutely manipulated with electric charges to reflect light in highly specific ways, Magink can produce surfaces that look like paper but behave like electronic screens, rendering high-resolution, full-color images without ink - or, as Magink executives like to refer to the process, with digital ink.' The billboard can display images at 70 frames per second." You can find more articles on the billboard technology on the Magink website.

8 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Why oh why... by Enoch+Root · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why is it that nowadays, any new cool thing is invented either for military or advertising use?

    The day advertising and the military merge, we'll be in a world of hurt. They'll end up creating a pop-up that kills, I tell ya.

    1. Re:Why oh why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The day advertising and the military merge, we'll be in a world of hurt.

      Wake up dude. That last 3 US wars (Iraq, Afganistan, Iraq) have been full-on media circuses.

  2. My three-year old does this ... by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Digital ink = finger painting.

    --
    Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  3. whitepaper stats by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Informative
    From their whitepaper:

    Print quality image

    Combining 5mm pixel pitch, an RGB color model with 4096 colors, and a superior contrast ratio of 14:1, magink digital ink technology achieves an extremely natural look that very much resembles the look of printed images on paper.

    Compatibility to outdoor lighting environment

    magink's digital ink display billboard is reflective of incident light and requires no integrated illumination. Light that falls on the display from either the sun or external light sources is actually beneficial to the visibility of the image. A beautiful image is maintainable under the full range of daylight conditions.

    Low energy consumption

    magink display does not require any power to maintain an image: the image is held under power-off conditions. Only when replacing one image with another does the display require punctual application of power in order to set the new image.

    Since energy is needed only for refreshing the image and since magink's digital ink reflective display does not require back lighting, power consumption is low yielding less energy consumption, less heat dissipation and a longer mean time between failure (MTBF).

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  4. I need another distraction by odenshaw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, when I'm driving to work in the morning, a huge TV ad can distract me from driving, talking on my phone, reading the paper, shaving, eating, and putting my pants on.
    How am I supposed to get ready for work!?

  5. Ah, now I understand... by supertsaar · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the f. article
    "...an innovation by a New York-based display technology company whose name, Magink, is a combination of the words magic and ink..."
    Pfew. Glad they explained that, I'd never-ever would have guessed that.
    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  6. Ah, perfect for my car by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some days my car should be red. Some days blue. Some days a nice mauve. Then polka dots that change colors. How about flames that really flicker? Can't imagine flames on my wagon, but why not? Checkerboard? Heck, you can actually play checkers! Or chess. Or Othello. Backgammon. Hah, you can even play tetris. I can have my phone number flash on the side when I pass a cute girl (oh wait, I drive a wagon). I can have messages flash on the back telling that moron driving 30 in a 50 what I think of them. There's a world of possibilities here!

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  7. Re:Response Time & Dot Pitch? by koniosis · · Score: 5, Informative

    response time is different from refresh, i'll explain. If you take a normal LCD they usually have a 60Hz refresh and say 25-30ms response. What this means is that the LCD can show 60 different frams every second. However, the response time measures how long it takes for the LCD to change frames, the longer the time the longer the last image that was on the LCD is displayed, so if you have a high response time (25ms is considered normal but not good) then you will get "streaking" effects, where the previous frames overlap with the new frames. This can cause a horrible image and is very noticeable when the frames are very different e.g. fast motion graphics (films, games). Newer LCDs report a 16ms response, which makes streaking almost invisible in most cases. So you see, this is why I wanted to know what the response of the ink is.

    Also you may be wondering about TVs and their response time, T.Vs and Monitors (CRT) don't have a response time (or more to the point its the same as the refresh) because on a CRT screen the previous frame is not remembered as the "pixels" on a CRT so to speak, need to be constatly energised to display anything, so the second that the cathode ray stops hitting the phosphor the image dissapears, thus no reponse time.

    --
    I spent ages trying to think of sig, but never did :(