Slashdot Mirror


Steal This Computer Book 3

Peter Wayner writes: "If you're looking for a quick way to test the difference between reading text online and reading it in a book, turn to Steal This Computer Book 3 by Wallace Wang, the third edition of a popular series that promises to tell you 'what they won't tell you about the Internet.' All of the information in the book can be gathered from Google for free, but the crisp writing, clean presentation and printed format make the book a good deal. It's possible to curl up in a chair out of WiFi range and cruise the best parts of the Internet without leaving a trail of cookies." Read on below for the rest of Peter's review -- it's free! Steal This Computer Book 3 author Wallace Wang pages 358 publisher No Starch Press rating 9 reviewer Peter Wayner ISBN 1593270003 summary An irreverant

The book is a travelog of many of the most interesting or inflammatory corners of the Internet. There are chapters on hacktivism, hate crime, con games, spam, phone phreaking and dozens of other topics. If someone's spent time flaming about it, banning it, subpoenaing it, or demonizing it, there's probably a section on it here. All of the sections come with screen shots and URLs for further digging.

I found reading the book to be an odd pleasure. There was no way to click on the sites or try any of the software without heading for a computer, but that didn't seem to matter. If anything, it was nice to skip over the links and put off heading down alternate paths until later. The more I experience books like this, the more I begin to wonder if there's much in the hyper-fragmented, postmodern view of a narrative built out of multiply forking paths. This book offers one fairly simple arc that carries us through the most talked about corners of the web and it does it fairly gracefully. That's a pleasure unto itself.

The book comes with a rebellious gloss and semiotic history. The title was stolen from Steal This Book a collection of anarchist schemes written by Abbie Hoffman in the 1960s. Despite the title, that book became a bestseller -- offering a glimpse of the longterm prospects for Hoffman's revolution. All of the prole sheep dutifully bought a book filled with bombmaking techniques that promises to show you where "exactly to place the dynamite that will destroy the walls."

Hoffman's book showed that people will buy something they value even when they're told to steal it. The prole sheep intuitively understand that books cost money to create. But maybe that was a different era, before the web existed. This website offers the text even though there are four editions for sale at Amazon. I wonder who holds the rights?

Wang's book is nowhere near as radical or as dangerous. Hoffman wrote sentences like "The purpose of part two is not to fuck the system, but destroy it." Wang generally avoids such antagonistic language and speaks generally about anti-social behavior in the third person: "When hackers use social engineering, they often masquerade as a consultant or temporary worker..."

Much of the book, in fact, is filled with techniques that are presented as tools for protecting your privacy and your personal information. The back cover asks, "Is your computer safe from computer viruses and malicious hackers?" It's only partially aimed at helping people do asocial things on the Net. Helping people protect themselves from the evil hordes is a large part of it. Given that identity theft is a booming business, this edition is practically an anti-crime book.

What does this mean for the this Internet revolution? Will the current file trading yippies overthrow the copyright system? Will file sharing actually become the norm? Or will all of the Napsterites follow the paths of Hoffman's proteges and grow up, have kids, move to the burbs, and start paying for their content? Well, they might if the content is as comfortable as this book in the hands while sitting in a La-Z-Boy recliner. No popup windows. No flash graphics. No registration required. Just pure content. Hmmm.

Peter Wayner is the author of books like Policing Online Games, Translucent Databases and Java RAMBO Manifesto. Please don't steal them. You can purchase Steal This Computer Book 3 from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

49 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. A true statement by DigitalNinja7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "All of the information in the book can be gathered from Google for free" I think that line just about covers all non-fiction (and some fictional) books out there. Google is king, in my mind.

    --
    Show your love for the Hacker community
    HackerLogo.com
    1. Re:A true statement by FileNotFound · · Score: 3, Informative

      The book is hyped garbage.

      I looked at it during one of my monthly bookstore visits and was repulsed by it.

      It's like "The Idiots Guide to Being a Skript Kiddie".

      It rants about going to "hackerish" websites for information etc.

      The whole book reeks of beign targeted at naive teenages who watched Hackers one time too many and want to go haxxoring cause it's cool or something.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    2. Re:A true statement by jobugeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      He said primarily non-fiction. ;)

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    3. Re:A true statement by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      non fiction as in Bowling for Columbine ? I think your argument is valid for technical articles that are objective in nature. For subjective analysis of other non fiction topics, books/other media are still the king.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    4. Re:A true statement by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've used big iron multiprocessors to run my code (wot I wrote) but I can honestly say I couldn't make Windows say Hello World without severe head scratching :)

    5. Re:A true statement by phurley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course if you don't use images.google.com for those searches, they both return exactly that for which you were looking (the second had to be adjusted, too much porn in the world, so the searchs need to be more specific - I saw what you were after without changing the query, but it was not the first link).

      MOAB Article with picture

      Link to Heidi and Jenna, but you will have to $$$

      --
      Home Automation & Linux -- now I know I'm a geek
    6. Re:A true statement by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that's one of the problems with "kids these days."

      You think if you can't find it with Google it isn't on the internet; and if it isn't on the internet it isn't real.

      Well Sparky, those of us who are more than 10 years old remember things that happened and things we read about them in books and magazines that Google has no clue about. If such books and magazines are in a computer archive somewhere they're diked off from the internet ( a growing phenomenom as more and more people realize that not only is their information valuable, their information is the only thing of value they have to exchange)

      Case in point. If you use Google to find information about the sucessful flying of a kite across that Atlantic ocean all you will find is my own Slashdot post avering that it has been done. . . and a denial by someone else because they couldn't find it in a Google search.

      Yet all you have to do to find an in depth article of the feat is to go down to your local library and start browsing (yes, we browsed magazines in "the old days") copies of New Yorker magazine from the late 60's.

      The universe of knowledge has not been transfered to the internet.

      KFG

    7. Re:A true statement by travdaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right!

      Someone around /. said "If it doesn't exist on Google, then it doesn't exist." And someone even translated that phrase into Latin and made it their sig. If that isn't proof, I don't know what is.

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    8. Re:A true statement by drooling-dog · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yet all you have to do to find an in depth article of the feat is to go down to your local library and start browsing (yes, we browsed magazines in "the old days") copies of New Yorker magazine from the late 60's.

      Of course, the trick is knowing to browse copies of The New Yorker from the late 60's...

    9. Re:A true statement by zzyzx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So one obscure fact that was in a magazine 40 years ago not being stored on the internet makes it useless? No one said that every fact every is online, but if you wanted to know a random fact, would you first go to google or go to the library and start reading back issues of the New Yorker?

    10. Re:A true statement by drunk_as_in_beer · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've used big iron multiprocessors to run my code (wot I wrote) but I can honestly say I couldn't make Windows say Hello World without severe head scratching :)

      Its as simple as a batch file. Open up notepad and create hello_world.cmd:
      @echo off
      echo Hello World
      pause
      Or if you want to get all fancy with a GUI:
      @echo off
      echo Hello World > hello_world.txt
      notepad hello_world.txt
      DISCLAIMER: I am not responsible for any damages this code does to your system. If you have important data in a file called "hello_world.txt" do not execute this code!
      --
      --Drunk as in Beer
    11. Re:A true statement by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Freely available information just too valuable to mankind as a whole."

      Food is too valuable to the individual and will always win out, in the extreme, to the value to mankind as a whole.

      The question becomes, in an exchange society, with an abstracted medium of exchange which can only be obtained from other people ( self-sufficiency being virtually illegal), how does one obtain rice in the bowl tonight, as opposed to pie in the sky tomorrow?

      It's a legitimate quandry that's going to become more and more pressing to solve.

      In my case, last week I put rice in my bowl this week by charging money for the transmission of mathmatical information, which, in my turn, had to pay for as well.

      For the most part I was even only able to do this because of an artificial market for mathmatics imposed by the government ( I was tutoring high school students).

      As it happens I'm a poor American. I have a distaste for modern monetary trade, the art of making a living by filching money from the pockets of others. My approach is more old world. I be perfectly happy to do what I do for "free," because I do what I do because I wish to do it and not merely becasue I get payed to do it.

      So, in an exchange economy where my knowledge is valuable, but all I have to exchange is my knowledge, how do I put rice in my bowl ( and ideally a roof over it) without charging for it?

      KFG

  2. This series of books by Markvs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is great for non-techies, and is well written. But I suspect the average /.'er has learned most of the stuff in books 1&2 by osmosis already... and I'll wager that book 3 isn't much of a departure in terms of content.

    --
    46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
  3. Paper vs. Internet by jargoone · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Internet has ruined me forever. Ever since I got my ethernet connection in my dorm room, I haven't been able to read anything printed. I think it has something to do with needing higher throughput than anything printed can provide. That, and the fact that a goldfish has a longer attention span than I do.

    1. Re:Paper vs. Internet by BlackBolt · · Score: 2, Funny
      Since I got broadband, I have more pr0n than the Pope!![*]
      [*] Actually, that's saying a lot, since the Vatican library actually has a pornography section!!

      Yeah, but it takes him six months to walk to it and six more months to reach his arm out to grab his copy of Juggs.

  4. steal this book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    meh...id rather download the .pdf version from kazaa

  5. Hoffman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After this review, I'm more interested in the Hoffman book than the Wang book.

    1. Re:Hoffman by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Voila.

      Don't you mean 'walla'? Perhaps you forgot how to spell that word properly. On /., the correct spelling is 'walla' or 'wallah'.

      --

      Enigma

  6. "Steal This Computer Book" by product+byproduct · · Score: 4, Funny

    With a title like this, no wonder my local bookstore doesn't carry it.

    1. Re:"Steal This Computer Book" by nervous_twitch · · Score: 5, Funny
      With a title like this, no wonder my local bookstore doesn't carry it.

      They did. It's just not there anymore. ;)

      --
      Trees everywhere, and not a forest in sight.
  7. Memo to the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Hoffman's book showed that people will buy something they value even when they're told to steal it."

    That should tell you something about the true value of the wares you peddle, RIAA. Try cranking out something that contributes to culture, instead of the teen-pop whores and gangsta rappers that are contributing to it's decline.

    1. Re:Memo to the RIAA by b!arg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I vaguely remember a concept in economics (or I could just be making it up, that class was a long time ago) that said something to the effect that the "fair price" for a given item is something like the retail price minus the the value of the stolen amount. Essentially, how much revenue has that product brought in and then divide that by the number of copies that have been bought and stolen.

      Sure Sony has sold 10,000,000 copies of Britney's latest album at $20/CD (for easy math), but there are 5,00,000 more copies that have been burned for friends, downloaded from Kazaa and shoplifted from CD stores. $200,000,000 in revenue divded by 15,000,000 copies. The "fair price" would be $13 and change. Perhaps this theory is completely baseless and wrong, but I like it. :)

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    2. Re:Memo to the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Heck, the movie 'Pirates of the Carribean', which I recently pirated, said it was ok to be a pirate.

      ;-)

    3. Re:Memo to the RIAA by bhsurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but could it REALLY be a movie about pirates if it wasn't rated "Arrr"?

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
  8. No!!! by ENOENT · · Score: 4, Funny
    If someone's spent time flaming about it, banning it, subpoenaing it, or demonizing it, there's probably a section on it here.

    We really don't need a dead-tree edition of the goatse guy, now, do we?


    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
  9. Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or was this review almost completely devoid of any content actually relating to the book being reviewed?

    Paragraph 1 - A very broad overview of what the book covers
    Paragraph 2 - "Hey, reading a book is completely unlike reading a webpage"
    Paragraphs 3-5 - Review of a completely different book
    Paragraph 6 - Finally, some hint as to what's actually in the book. But no indication of whether the content is good or not. Are the techniques mentioned good or outdated? Easy to understand?
    Paragraph 7 - Back to talking about about the Hoffman book and completely ignoring the one actually being "reviewed".

  10. Interestingly. by lina_inverse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wallace Wang wrote Visual Basic 6 For Dummies.
    Wait.. did I just say that? On Slashdot?
    Oh dear..

  11. Making a pitch for printed materials by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My dad always had a great example of why books are better than the internet.
    He says, "because you can do this." and proceeds to flip through all the pages like a big stack of crisp, 20-dollar bills. The instant information access, unless the book is in a fire or something, is what always makes books cool. That, plus they're easier on the eyes than a CRT (for me). :)

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Making a pitch for printed materials by shakah · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The instant information access, unless the book is in a fire or something, is what always makes books cool.
      Don't underestimate the value of being able to search and cut-and-paste electronic media.

      I can picture your Dad referring you to something neat in that precious stack of pages -- "You have to read this (flip, flip), I think it was on page ninety-something (flip, flip, scan, scan), no, wait, it must be here somewhere (flip, scan), ..."

      Not to mention the annoyance of the not-so-instant access when wanting to quote part of a printed book in another medium.

  12. Public Domain by d-e-w · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hoffman's book showed that people will buy something they value even when they're told to steal it. The prole sheep intuitively understand that books cost money to create. But maybe that was a different era, before the web existed. This website offers the text even though there are four editions for sale at Amazon. I wonder who holds the rights?

    Any author can chose to release any writing with copyright into the public domain prior to the natural expiration of copyright. Once that occurs, nobody owns the rights.

    Given the author, and the book, my guess would be that it's in the public domain.

  13. Why a book is still better than a web page by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Instant on, instant off
    2. It don't break when you drop it
    3. You can take it to the beach
    4. You can hide it inside another book to look smart
    5. You can hide it inside a porno mag to look cool
    6. You can paper the cover
    7. You can leave it on a bus seat
    8. It never runs out of batteries
    9. A rack of them look impressive up against the wall

    But, on the other hand:

    1. You never get them back when you lend them out
    2. If you do, you wish you hadn't
    3. You can't search them, so you have to flip back and forwards
    4. You can't run them through the Jargonizer to see what the author would have sounded like in Hillbilly
    5. You can't print them and give them to someone, saying "hey, look at this cool web page"
    6. You can't hyper link to them.
    7. You can't cut and paste the good bits to make you look smart on slashdot (like that was difficult!)

    But then again,

    10. No girl ever fell for you because you were browsing a cool web page

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Why a book is still better than a web page by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      10. No girl ever fell for you because you were browsing a cool web page

      I have a sneaking suspicion that CmdrTaco might have a different opinion.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Why a book is still better than a web page by Amomynos+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no no, you got in completely wrong:

      > 1. Instant on, instant off

      It takes time to switch computer on, so you have a good excuse to not turn it off.

      > 2. It don't break when you drop it

      If you drop your computer and it breaks, you have a good excuse to buy a new, faster one.

      > 3. You can take it to the beach

      Beach is a good excuse to buy the latest laptop.

      > 4. You can hide it inside another book to look smart

      You can hide the /. window behind Emacs to look smart

      > 5. You can hide it inside a porno mag to look cool

      You can hide /. window behind porno page to look cool

      > 6. You can paper the cover

      You can put a cool blue light inside your computer

      > 7. You can leave it on a bus seat

      So you can also leave your computer, and you'll make someone even more happier than leaving a book (and you again get the excuse to buy better computer)

      > 8. It never runs out of batteries

      But it still doesn't have the cool blue light.

      > 9. A rack of them look impressive up against the wall

      But imagine a beowulf cluster...

    3. Re:Why a book is still better than a web page by akudoi · · Score: 2, Funny

      10. No girl ever fell for you because you were browsing a cool web page

      then again, no girl has ever fallen for me for reading a book either.

      i guess the AD&D across the top didn't help.

    4. Re:Why a book is still better than a web page by forgetful_ca · · Score: 4, Funny

      You dork, you made me cry.

  14. Infringe this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    meh...id rather download the .pdf version from kazaa

    That would be *copyright infringment* not stealing.

    Sheesh, haven't you learned anything on Slashdot?

  15. No cookies? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    without leaving a trail of cookies.

    As long as you don't check it out of a library (USA PATRIOT Act.)

  16. I don't use the computer anymore by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    There was no way to click on the sites or try any of the software without heading for a computer, but that didn't seem to matter.


    I sold off my computer last year because I couldn't keep up with all the clicking and damned hyperlinks all over the web. Annoying things they are. Baah.


    Instead, I've taken to calling people I know, when I need anything off the interweb. The printouts usually arrive in the mail in a day or two. True, the timelag is high, but my friends're getting better at it everyday.


    For a beer or two, these guys usually refresh /. for me 10-15 times a day and post comments for me when I feel like it. Okay gotto go, I think I'm getting another call

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  17. Good idea. by worm+eater · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somehow it seems that taking the content of the internet out of the context of the internet allows you to see it in a new light. Just as the internet brought new meaning to content through interactivity, multi-media presentation and hyperlinkage, books have their own virtues that cannot be replicated on the net. Whereas the internet encourages and supports a short attention span, and IMO, detail-oriented thinking, the book format usually demands a longer attention span and 'big picture' sort of attitude.

    Both have their place, of course, and I don't think a short attention span is necessarily a bad thing. But books try to force you to carry a thought through to a conclusion, within limited parameters, where the internet allows you to branch off and fragment your thought -- which in turn allows you to consider many ideas from many points of view -- just not very deeply.

    So putting the internet into a book may just force some people to think about the implications of the new media, rather than focusing on the ever changing content.

    --
    Maybe partying will help...
  18. Based on previous editions, skip it by plcurechax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is at all like the previous editions of the same title, then I recommend you Skip this Computer Book.

    Get a decent book about computer abuse/misuse:

    Hacking Exposed, 4th edition
    Hackers Beware, by Eric Cole
    Counterhack, by Ed Skoudis

    These books are written by computer security professionals who may their living both doing computer security and teaching computer security (SANS and Foundstone).

    Steal This Computer Book seems to be aimed at too young to know they are getting ripped off kids and computer novices. So don't buy this book if you are over 10.

  19. The Hoffman book only cost a buck, ok? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It wasn't, like, any big deal to lay down a buck, maybe at that cool head shop you liked to support anyway. Made my buck back the first day using its dumpster diving tips. All in all it was a good investment.

    Besides, you've got it inside out. The joke was on the proles in the traditional capitalist business mode. They actually bought the rights to, printed and distributed a book that admonished you to steal it, right on the cover ( and even explained that the "artist" would get his cut even if you did. That was part of the subversion. It has modern repurcussions. Download an ebook off Kazaa, go to the Federal pen for 20 years and get a quarter million dollar fine while screwing the artist. STEAL a book and it's only petty larceny. Probation at most if it's your first offense; and the artist gets payed for it! Support your favorite "content producer" and stick it to the man at the same time. Steal books and CDs. Do It! Abbie and Jerry live, man! Free Attica!)

    Oh, sorry, I got sidetracked. Flashback. That brown acid was apparently some bad shit.

    Anyway, I treasured Steal This Book and I'm not all ashamed that I payed for it, nor was I in any way a "prole" for having done so. I wish I still had my copy. I would, except ( are you ready for it?). . .

    Someone stole it. Really.

    KFG

  20. Umm, no by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hoffman's book showed that people will buy something they value even when they're told to steal it.

    No, it didnt. Noone ever took the title literally, as a command to steal it. They took it as what it was, a sort of ironic tongue-in-cheek wisecrack. The book didnt empower people to "fight the man", it poked fun at the new mooching generation of hippies, showing how wrong their ideals were.

    This is like saying you were shocked when the end credits rolled after watching The Neverending Story.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Umm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This is like saying you were shocked when the end credits rolled after watching The Neverending Story."

      Must... resist.. Simpsons... reference...oh to heck with it.

      Hutz: Mr. Simpson, this is the most blatant case of fraudulent advertising since my suit against the film, "The Never-Ending Story".

  21. Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A friend of mine actually tried to shoplift this book out of Barnes and Noble. The cops got involved, and anyway, things turned out nasty. I think the writers should pay more attention to their titles and avoid misadvertisement that could potentially get the casual browser in trouble.

  22. Re:Wallace Wang by gregarican · · Score: 2, Funny
    "at an open mic i used to play at coffee shop i used to play at."
    Was this *coffee shop* located in Amsterdam by any chance?
  23. Apples and Oranges by porkrind · · Score: 2, Informative

    My mom loves the STCB series, and that's the audience No Starch is going for with this book - those that don't really know much about the internet or computer security. It's a good read with interesting anecdotes. Nothing more, nothing less.

    I can guarantee you that my mom would be much less enthralled with any of the books you listed.

    -John Mark
    Acquisitions Editor
    No Starch Press

  24. For those of us not born in the Age of Aquarius... by ctrl-alt-elite · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the definition of 'prole.'

  25. Another 9 rating for a book review by LoRider · · Score: 2, Informative

    I haven't read this book but I had the misfortune of purchasing the previous edition. It was a horrible book that provided such worthless information I was embarrassed to have purchased it. I usually sell my used books on Amazon so someone else can enjoy them but not this one. I tossed it into the fireplace. I couldn't subject someone else to this wretched book. It provided zero information that couldn't be found by searching Google.

    Maybe the new version is better, but I doubt it.

    --
    LoRider
  26. Steal This....... by Dredd2Kad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ....I wouldn't even take this crap again if it were handed to me. I bought his first "Steal This" book because it was marked down to $2. I thought it might e an interesting read. Well, I soon found out it wasn't

    I couldn't even give that chunk of dung away to the used book store for free.

    The book was full of information like this..and this is almost a direct quote:

    "If you want to hack a box, get an admin password with root access" And that was it on that subject.

    The book also advocated the use of mail-bomb tools and the like to get even with people that spammed you or sent you porn from if you happened to be on an AOL network.

    It was complete crap.....