Slashdot Mirror


China Joins EU in Galileo Satellite Venture

CHaN_316 writes "Yahoo has posted a story that says China to Participate in Galileo Satellite Program. 'The agreement provides for cooperation in satellite navigation, technology, industrial manufacturing, market development, frequency and certification'. This is definitely a good boost to the satellite program since it injects fresh cash into the project. There are probably strategic reasons for joining this network since it's an alternative to the American controlled GPS system. Here's more information about Galileo." China is also moving quickly toward getting a man in space.

13 of 376 comments (clear)

  1. They're a bit late! by earthloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Galileo is to plumet into Jupiters atmosphere on Sunday!

    1. Re:They're a bit late! by mgs1000 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Shhhhhh! Don't tell the Chinese

      -The EU

  2. Galileo on BBC.. by adeyadey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Story also on BBC NEWS- China will cough up 259 mega-dollars towards the costs. The Pentagon are not too happy about it, but it does give the EU a way to do important things like landing planes, without worrying that someone else could throw the switch.

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Galileo on BBC.. by mz001b · · Score: 5, Funny
      China will cough up 259 mega-dollars towards the costs.

      Wait, is that $259 million or $272 million? I smell a lawsuit...

    2. Re:Galileo on BBC.. by presroi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same applies to Galileo. How can anyone be sure that the EU won't "throw the switch"?

      The answer is that this question is obsolete. Next Generation Positioning Systems will be able to get information out from GPS, from Galileo and maybe from LORAN-C or the local GSM-cellphone cell information as a fallback.

      I consider redundancy as a mayor pro argument even in the eyes of American companies and .gov institutions.

    3. Re:Galileo on BBC.. by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was actually having a conversation just the other day about this with a military defense contractor (missile guidance) who just happens to be related to me:)

      They are actually VERY excited about Galileo.. as it gives them exactly the redundancy you talk about. As I understand it, a lot of the rhetoric between the EU/U.S. has been very very positive about the project, which is somewhat counter to the sensationalistic viewpoint that most news organizations seem to take.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
  3. US vs. Them by rde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any time I've seen Galileo mentioned in the US media, it's been treated as some sort of anti-US measure; it isn't.

    Well, it isn't totally an anti-US measure. We just don't like the idea of a system on which our lives increasingly depend being under the control of a foreign military. Doesn't really matter who that military is; any system where you can find yourself suddenly lost at the whim of some general half a world away is a system to be avoided. And as the Iraq war is showing, the US is increasingly cagey (cagy? How do you spell that damn word?) about others using its system in time of war. And that time of war looks like it's going to extend indefinitely.

    <anti-US bit>
    Of course, the advent of Chinese involvement is, I hope a sign of things to come. Kyoto and others have shown that disaster doesn't necessarily follow when the US says 'no', and that the best attitude the world can have may well be "fuck 'em, and carry on regardless".

    I'd love to see one big happy world, but in its absence I'm reasonably satisfied with one big, happy world-except-America.
    </anti-US>

    let the flames begin...

  4. Cooperation isn't always positive... by arashiakari · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...when you're cooperating with the enemy.

    I mean, China's interests are not the world's interests. History folks: read it.

    I don't know how to say this withought sounding paranoid, but just because you have a science co-op doesn't mean everyone is interested in the same thing. China is more than gung ho about this project because EVERY space launch technology is dual-use for military application. I think it is a little cavalier (that's "dangerous" for you folks in high school) to do anything that puts more power in the hands of anti-freedom communists. Look at what they are doing to democratic Taiwan if you want to see what they would do to Europe or the U.S.A. if they had the ability.

    You're talking about a nation that has a reverse-firewall on the entire CONTINENT... to keep people from being "infected" by rogue ideas like ownership, equality, and government existing through the sanction of the governed. You're talking about a nation that controls the news media with an iron fist to keep people from knowing when bad things happen as a result of communism. China is the closest thing to 1984 on the planet right now. Do we really want to share technology with them?

    1. Re:Cooperation isn't always positive... by mikelu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>I mean, China's interests are not the world's interests. History folks: read it.

      This statement is equally true: "The USA's interests are not the world's interests."

      As for the rest...
      I suggest you talk to some people who have actually lived in the People's Republic of China (PRC) recently. The Chinese government's lumbering inefficiency isn't limited to industry, it extends into the realms of censorship and informational control as well. The so called "iron fist" is a rusted piece of scrap metal.

      The "Great Firewall" is utterly worthless. The Chinese people can get access to any news article or information on any website they want.

      If you think the media controls implemented by the Chinese government can prevent the people from finding out what's going on, you're sorely mistaken. Everyone in China knows the media is censored. They know the press is unreliable and full of propaganda (unlike in the good old USA, where most people don't realize the amount of self-censorship practiced by the media). News travels by word of mouth, on internet bulletin boards and chatrooms, and via physical bulletin boards at universities and colleges.

      And if you think the PRC is still Communist, you need to go back to school. Last time I checked, Communism didn't include private ownership of land and industry, entrepreneurialism, corporations, or a free market. The last vestiges of nationalized industry in China are being privatized as we post.

      China is changing, but it is changing slowly. The current government survives on ignorance. As more of the population becomes educated, democracy will assert itself. I think most Americans would be surprised by how much the Chinese government is already influenced by the will of the people.

  5. Some 'Allies'... by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From http://www-cgsc.army.mil/milrev/English/MarApr01/a dams.asp

    GPS Signals Jammed During Tank Trials

    Lieutenant Colonel Lester W. Grau, US Army, Retired

    Based on 6 August 2000 reports in The Sunday Times of London, Agence France-Presse and the 25 September 2000 Elevtheros Tipos, Athens

    The highly accurate Global Positioning System (GPS) supports modern ground forces as they move and shoot. Maps and compasses stay in cases as digitized forces quickly use GPS to determine their location and the enemy's. Although map-reading skills atrophy, few worry that GPS may suddenly provide erroneous information or cease working. Still, US Army equipment has already faced attacks on GPS functions--by allies.

    In August 2000 the Greek government sponsored a tank competition at Litokhoro to determine the Greek army's next tank--a deal worth $1.4 billion for 250 tanks. Competitors included the British Challenger 2E, the US M1A1 Abrams, the German Leopard 2A5 and the French Leclerc. During the trials, the British and US tanks had navigation problems despite using multiple GPS satellites to determine their positions precisely. After the embarrassing performance, officials discovered that the GPS satellites were being jammed--by a French security agency. Less than a foot high, the jammers transmitted stronger signals than satellites on the same frequency. The jammers were reportedly hidden on the firing range and remotely activated as US and British tanks were tested.

    Greek defense officials found the jamming episode rather amusing and discounted the associated technical problems. The threat remains: if an ally can create such havoc during a test, what effect could hostile GPS jamming have during combat?

  6. Re:Joint-Venture by gregarican · · Score: 5, Funny

    We didn't say space camera, we said space gamera !

  7. Re:Leave the flags out of it by amightywind · · Score: 5, Informative
    Why must nations always get involved and turn space exploration into an Us vs. Them contest?

    Good question. Fear and paranoia drove the US to the greatest technical achievement of the millenium with the moon landings. Since then it has been all hugs and kisses with the Russians in the space station and no progress! I'll take the competition, and progress.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  8. Re:Short sighted by geeklawyer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Europe faces NO threat from ever being attack by the US.

    This is such a laughable assertion that I could write a book discrediting it. American has spent 100 years threatening and enacting diplomatic economic and military warfare against those who threaten its private interests. It is not unique in that of course, we British did the same for the past 200 years when our empire was the pre-eminent one. The US is now the pre-eminent empire and it bullies those countries who offer a challenge to its authority. Such attacks are of course justified as necessary to defend 'freedom, democracy and international order', as it defines it.
    Non-one is fooled for a moment - well, ok, you are apparently.

    However, two brief and far from unique examples suffice to prove you wrong:
    1.the Bush 'Hague Invasion Act'. If a US soldier commits a war crime and the Hague International Criminal Court convict and imprisons him the US will attack the Hague. The Hague for your information is a part of Europe (old Europe of course).
    2. After the Second World War (c. 1946) the US threatened Italians that if they voted into power the communists they would attack them with the residue of their WW2 forces in the rest of Europe in order to overthrow them. Naturally this was to 'defend freedom'; poor simple Italian peasants didnt know what was best for them so you threatened to invade to persuade them to do the 'right' thing; which just coincidentally matches your global plans for freedom.
    Italy is also a part of Europe (old Europe).
    the US has threatened Europe at many different levels, including militarily, in the past. Since we pose an actual threat to US power and influence it is not hard to imagine that in the future more threats will arise.
    If Europe ever threatens US global corporate interests it will be bullied and threatened with attack - this is the demonstrable pattern of US imperialism. Only if we are not dependant on American military technology can we ever have the option to do defend ourselves against it if the need arises. Only a fool would deny himself even the option of self defence against a tyrant - even if the tyrant is one who currently pats you on the head and says 'good boy, good faithful boy'.
    Since Americans are parochial and not very sophisticated let me put it in terms you might understand: would you like to rely for your national defence on Gallileo?

    The only agenda the US has is a world were all countries have some form of democratically elected government and a homegrown form of capitalism.

    Jeeeeesus, where to start with this one? (do you work or Bush?)
    Understand that I dont blame you for your public display of self-delusion. You are a dupe. All that saluting the flag crap you people do at school has indoctrinated you into the belief you are part of a good nation. But ask around the World. Ask the people of S.America who have spent decades of being murdered tortured raped and otherwise subject to US sponsored US organised terrorism by Fascist governments and their Green Beret trained special forces who are taught to electrocute burn and beat. All financed by the CIA in order to protect US banana/oil/rubber/whatever companies.

    of course you'll need to browse at -1 Troll to see this since all the yanks mods will regard this comment as clearly unhelpful to freedom.
    And if I ever fly to the US I will be detained at guantanamo bay as a "terrorist sympathiser". Another legitimate act of self defence by Bush.

    --
    -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
    journal