Slashdot Mirror


MIT Emerging Technologies Conference

StoneLion writes "At Technology Review's Emerging Technologies Conference at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology this week, speakers in various disciplines provided fascinating glimpses of future technology, including exotica like hydrogen energy and smart dust. NewsForge has a conference report." Newsforge and Slashdot are both part of OSDN.

101 comments

  1. Resistance is futile by Brahmastra · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But the most interesting discussion came from Intel's David Tennenhouse. He noted that we've passed the one person, one computer milestone. The next wave will include networked embedded computers that give real-time information, enabling proactive computing that can anticipate our needs. Enabling technologies for that trend include physical control of biological and chemical elements; ubiquitous computing in the form of smart dust, RFID, and software radio; planetary-scale distributed systems (PlanetLab is one example); and new probabilistic methods of machine learning.

    We are Borg?
  2. Interesting quote from Dell by HanClinto · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I liked this one:

    To determine what businesses his company wants to be in, Dell looks for large markets where there are inefficiencies or high mark-ups. He looks for standards, because markets don't usually become high-volume until standards exist. Dell said standards benefit users, while proprietary hardware benefits only the company selling it.

    +4 insightful to Dell there.

    1. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by w.p.richardson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perfectly ties in with why Dell is going into the wireless biz to compete with Blackberry (RiM); Hardware benefits only the company selling it.

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    2. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by Leffe · · Score: 1

      Dell was the only speaker to mention Linux

      That was nice too.

      But actually pretty disappointing if you give it some time... only one company :(

    3. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by b0r0din · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's sort of ironic that Dell has any part in a conference on emerging technologies, because what Dell specializes in is supply infrastructure. They don't have nearly as many patents as IBM or HP but they are VERY VERY good at getting things to their customers and keeping their customers happy. In other words, they create extremely efficient processes and have outlasted other PCs because they understand the commodities market. Why Dell is considered a major player makes little sense.

      A better way to buy, sell, and trade your games.

    4. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by gricholson75 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dell against proprietary hardware? Since when. I have a dead Presicion 220 in my office because it needs a proprietary power supply. The new desktops have a power supply that runs across the bottom of the case. Dell has used a lot of proprietary hardware.

    5. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Dell said standards benefit users, while proprietary hardware benefits only the company selling it.

      Mr. Greedy Bastard replied by saying, "I have no incentive to create a standard unless I get to benefit the most. Giving and getting back from the community doesn't build vacation homes, or improve my chances of catching a trophy wife by having MORE than the next guy!"

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    6. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dell looks for large markets where there are inefficiencies or high mark-ups. "

      Probably explains why their going after iPod and iTunes.

    7. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by nullard · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not a new trend. Dell has copied most of Apple's innovations since at least '99. They just copy the guys with the highest margins. Since the ones with the highest margins have them so that they can afford to develop interesing new technologies, Dell is just outsourcing its R&D and market research for free.

      A brief history.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    8. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously no one shares this vision in their printer-sales department. Dell's printers use propietary ink cartridges full of proprietary nonsense.

    9. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'll try not to be wasted next time I post.

    10. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by adam872 · · Score: 1

      Please permit me to laugh sarcastically at Dell. Their ad campaigns champion a non-proprietary approach, but how is Intel hardware any less proprietary than anybody else (or their other buddies Microsoft)? I don't see any open source CPU's on the market. Sure, there are multiple vendors you can get system boards, disks etc etc from for PC's, but the same also applies for SPARC, MIPS, PPC et al. Not to mention that some of the proprietary O/S's run on more than one CPU family (HP-UX, VMS, Solaris). Let's not be fooled into thinking that if Michael Dell could corner a market and bump up his margins, he wouldn't do so in a heartbeat. Having said all of that, I love standards (there are so many of them), as it makes interoperability easier and reduces vendor lock in. That's where the real value is for me. He is right, though, about standards opening the door for high volume sales. This is often the case, in my experience.

    11. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by sd_jeff · · Score: 1

      Dell said standards benefit users, while proprietary hardware benefits only the company selling it.

      Yeah, one of the biggest examples of this is Microsoft's proprietary Office formats. From the user's point of view, it's really too bad vendors can't compete fairly on merits...despite the ideas like those in this thread.

    12. Re:Interesting quote from Dell by bongoras · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they sell laptops with a choice of two wireless cards: the intel "centrino" thing and a broadcom 'satan' card, neither of which have Linux drivers...

  3. conference presentations by stonebeat.org · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i wish the presentations from MIT Emerging Technologies Conference, LinuxWorld, and Apache be available on the internet for free. I can't go to all of them. i only have money to goto to ApacheCon :(

    Video taping them, and making them available on the internet or on a CD for a charge could be also beneficial. Just a thought.

    1. Re:conference presentations by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      Well, I live in Norway, Europe, and going to America for a conference is way to expensive. I totally support your idea, and I would also like to see some more conferences here in Europe. Even in England, it would still be a lot easier and cheaper for me to go to than USA.

      I find conferences like this both interesting and important. Both to keep up with what's going on, and a way of expressing your own ideas. But like I said, it's hard for people like me to attend, when most of the conferences are held in USA

    2. Re:conference presentations by GoofyBoy · · Score: 0

      I agree with you.

      Perhaps we should get together in one location with other like-minded individuals to discuss new and exciting technologies to support this sort of thing and in-turn be informed of any new developments.

      (MOD ME: TROLL -1!)

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:conference presentations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " i wish the presentations from MIT Emerging Technologies Conference, LinuxWorld, and Apache be available on the internet for free."

      Then who would pay the $100 or so per copy of the proceedings they usually charge at conferences?

    4. Re:conference presentations by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Try MIT world they video lectures and presentations by current and former MIT professors.

    5. Re:conference presentations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeg stoetter deg 99%.

  4. Smart dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean my appartment will become self aware ?

    1. Re:Smart dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and you won't have to "imagine a Beowulf cluster" of dust bunnies.

  5. search engine ads by moorg · · Score: 1, Funny
    Contextual marketing -- for example, ads on Google searches -- is gaining ground over non-contextual content, such as e-mail lists.

    I've had a guy from ah-ha.com call me three days in a row wanting to sell me pop unders and large banners on search engines that wrap google's results with their advertising.

    Just hung up on a telemarketer who was reading from her screen about 'being very impressed with my site' and would like to improve it's rankings.

    There is money in this market.

    1. Re:search engine ads by Tsali · · Score: 1

      Ah-Ha has a new single? Of course they need pop-unders!

      --
      This space for rent.
    2. Re:search engine ads by ion++ · · Score: 0
      Just hung up on a telemarketer who was reading from her screen about 'being very impressed with my site' and would like to improve it's rankings.

      next time, just tell her to visit your website and ask her how impressed she is

  6. Dell's business niche, and music service by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This caught my eye.

    Dell words of wisdom
    To determine what businesses his company wants to be in, Dell looks for large markets where there are inefficiencies or high mark-ups. He looks for standards, because markets don't usually become high-volume until standards exist. Dell said standards benefit users, while proprietary hardware benefits only the company selling it.


    Which is interesting in light of the anouncement of the music service, since the music industry is a glarring example of high mark ups.

  7. Is that an emerging technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Or are you just glad to see me?

  8. 15 months? by CodeWheeney · · Score: 1

    15 months to get there? What, are they letting one of the blue hairs from Sun City (a retirement community near Phoenix) drive?

    --
    C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    1. Re:15 months? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Knock, Knock".

      "Excuse me, can you give me directions to the thread about the moon mission?"

      "Sure, it's one story back that-a-way!"

      =)

    2. Re:15 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they would get there. Judging by your apparent navigation skills, you'd end up lost in the Delta Quadrant.

    3. Re:15 months? by CodeWheeney · · Score: 1

      "Ah, thanks"

      *looks sheepishly up at the street sign he just asked directions to.

      I am an idiot.

      --
      C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
  9. Why Dell as the Keynote? by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While Dell is a successful company, I don't think of them when it comes to emerging technologies. As he said, "Dell looks for large markets where there are inefficiencies or high mark-ups..." This sounds like the stable, mature technologies. Wouldn't some company on the bleeding edge been a better choice?

    1. Re:Why Dell as the Keynote? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Well, one could argue that Dell has developed some very successful technologies that relate to supply management. Perhaps they look for large, stable markets, and apply new management technologies to make them more efficient and stable.

  10. One I predict will be big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    those specially designed surfaces that deflect all dirt, water, etc. When combined with paper display technolgy, you'll have a tactile user interface on any piece of paper or surface, and it won't even become dirty.

  11. Hydrogen? Er... by metroid+composite · · Score: 4, Insightful
    GM's Lawrence Burns gave a vision of technology in the auto industry. He envisions fuel cell propulsion, hydrogen fuel, and electronic and software systems replacing the internal combustion engine, petroleum fuel, and mechanical controls.

    Unfortunately, last time I checked Hydrogen just wasn't particularly practical. Why? It takes up too much space for one thing; unles you're going to use Liquid Hydrogen which takes a lot of energy to keep cool. Secondly how do you make the stuff? Electrolosis with water right? This is all based on articles I saw years ago, but I remember you needed roughly twice the electricity to make the Hydrogen than you get back when you run the car. That's fine if you're running on Hydroelectric dams, but what about all the cars in areas where they have coal or Nuclear Power Plants?

  12. intel & dell's engineers are s.m.a.r.t! by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Having sat in on a few meetings with Intel and Dell guys, I can say for certain that they are really sharp. I am thrilled to see that Dell has stepped up to the hardware standards intelligence, and realized that benefitting the consumer in the end benefits the company, while creating things purely for profit inevitably ends in disaster :)

    --
    stuff |
  13. I predict the pants of the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will automatically alter themselves as fashion dictates (and waistlines demand)

  14. Recycled emerging technologies. by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Every one of those ideas was being talked up ten or more years ago. Fuel cells, large numbers of networked embedded computers, nanotech, and the hydrogen economy have all been around before. We need some new new ideas.

    Or we need to make some of the important older new ideas, like fusion power, work. We desperately need a new power source. If we don't get one, we're headed back to a coal economy.

    1. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by bartlog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Fuel cells, large numbers of networked embedded computers, nanotech, and the hydrogen economy have all been around before

      Nanotech has been around? What? The idea yes, actual implementation no. I am pessimistic about nanotech in the near term, but really, if it can be made to work you aren't going to need a lot of other new, new ideas.

      Or we need to make some of the important older new ideas, like fusion power, work.

      What does fusion power get you that a breeder reactor doesn't? You still have nuclear waste issues as a result of neutron emission. Even without (fission) breeder reactors, the thorium in the earth's crust would allow us to meet our energy needs through nuclear fission for some millenial span into the future - if we could deal with the environmental issues.

    2. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by smithwis · · Score: 1
      What does fusion power get you that a breeder reactor doesn't? You still have nuclear waste issues as a result of neutron emission. Even without (fission) breeder reactors, the thorium in the earth's crust would allow us to meet our energy needs through nuclear fission for some millenial span into the future - if we could deal with the environmental issues.
      Umm, less sources of nuclear contamination, theoerticaly more energy, and a safe biproduct to name a few.
      You were joking right?
    3. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
      What does fusion power get you that a breeder reactor doesn't?

      Maybe a technology that works.

      Breeder reactors have a terrible track record. Graphite reactors and sodium-cooled reactors are both major fire hazards, and there have been major fires at both types of plant. Windscale and Chernoybl were both large graphite reactors, and both had major fires. Most large sodium-cooled reactors have been shut down, either after a major fire (Joyu A, Beloyarsk, Monju) or because of concerns about one (Kalkar, Superphenix).

      Even when not having fires, breeder reactors seem to have major downtime. Superphenix only had 174 days of full-power operation over a decade. Pressurized-water reactors routinely operate with over 90% uptime. The only big one still running is B-600 at Beloyarsk, built in 1980. It has a history of sodium fires and radiation leaks, despite massive attempts to prevent them.

    4. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I am pessimistic about nanotech in the near term

      Define "near term." Advances in the evolution of all kinds of technology will continue to progress at an exponential pace; so the long-term is closer to the near-term than you would think.

      but really, if it can be made to work you aren't going to need a lot of other new, new ideas.

      What do you mean "if it can be made to work?" Nature already does it, and "The principles of physics, as far as I can see, do not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom." artificially.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by jafac · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. When Coal runs out, Solar will become cheaper, and we'll be on a Solar economy. Assuming, of course, any sunlight will still make it down to the surface after we've burned all the fossil fuels we can. But hey, profit's important, right?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by bartlog · · Score: 1

      Advances in the evolution of all kinds of technology will continue to progress at an exponential pace; ...
      Hand-waving nonsense. What does it mean for technology to advance at 'an exponential rate'? Is technology some sort of scalar quantity? And yes, I know about Moore's law, and I am aware that memory density is also following something like an exponential curve. Neither of those get you to nano-scale self-replication simply by getting bigger, though. If replication is so easy, why hasn't a replicator been built at the macro scale?
      What do you mean "if it can be made to work?"
      Well, I think it probably can be - I basically agree with you here. But being a skeptic and an engineer by nature I am always doubtful until implementation is actually successful.

    7. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by bartlog · · Score: 1


      Well, let's see:
      1) Less sources of nuclear contamination

      OK, the fuel may or may not be as bad as in a conventional fission reactor: I agree that I'd rather have a tritium leak than a plutonium one. But there will still be a neutron flux that will ultimately result in nuclear waste that needs to be disposed of. And unless you have an idea as to what the final configuration of a working fusion reactor is going to look like, I think it's premature to declare contamination less of an issue.

      2) Theoretically more energy

      Not terribly relevant since in theory both technologies can provide vast quantities of energy. In practice of course our fusion technology has yet to produce any positive energy returns.

      3) A safe byproduct

      Yes, the fact that the result of the fusion reaction is nice, innocuous helium is a big selling point, and goes a long way towards explaining all the interest in this technology. Too bad you also get neutrons (which in turn are absorbed to create various isotopes of the surrounding elements, aka radioactive waste). You might end up with less waste per unit of energy, but in the end you still have to solve the problem of radioactive waste disposal.

    8. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by enkidu · · Score: 2, Informative
      Advances in the evolution of all kinds of technology will continue to progress at an exponential pace;

      You can measure "all technology" with a single variable (or each technology depending on how you parse your sentence)? Gimme a break. So, it's just a matter of time before we have more artificial memory capacity than there are atoms in the known universe? Kurzweil may be smart, but that doesn't mean everything he writes is correct or even reasonable. In some areas, he's a certifiable nut.

      What do you mean "if it can be made to work?" Nature already does it, and "The principles of physics, as far as I can see, do not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom." artificially.

      But there are other principles than Physics involved. Organization and coordination being a big one (the big one in my opinion). How will nano-bots coordinate their activities? Radio waves? Too small. Chemicals? Too expensive and potentially complex. Tiny interconnects? Too fragile. How much memory/state can a theoretical nano-bot have? What messages will they need to coordinate? The organization and coordination of cells in nature (ie your body) is an insanely complex dance of chemical and biological triggers developed over billions of years of evolution. Duplicating something even remotely similar is a decidedly non-trivial task and one that has been neglected amongst all of the hype about the "comming age of nano-technology". Bah Humbug.

      --

      There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
      -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
    9. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I know about Moore's law, and I am aware that memory density is also following something like an exponential curve.

      And harddisk size, and backbone bandwidth, and the number of internet nodes, and the cost/performance of tech, etc. Any evolutionary process progresses at an exponential rate if you just observe history. (Take the evolution of transportation as yet another example - with its 'Singularity' being the speed of light (or FTL, if possible)).

      If replication is so easy, why hasn't a replicator been built at the macro scale?

      Maybe for the same reason that nature didn't come up with a macroscale Von-Neumann organism: it's not efficient. matter on the atomic scale is 'programmable' and doesn't 'break', but bulk parts and bulk processes do easily.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      I think that if every car had a gps and a wi-fi connections than every car should know about all cars within 300 ft of them and their speed and direction of travel. I would think that with this information they could alert the driver of any possible collision and how to avoid them.

    11. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by krysith · · Score: 1

      From the Fusion FAQ:

      *** H. What is aneutronic fusion?

      Some researchers feel the advantages of neutron-free fusion reactions offset the added difficulties involved in getting these reactions to occur, and have coined the term
      "aneutronic fusion" to describe these reactions.

      The best simple answer I've seen so far is this one: (I've done some proofreading and modified the notation a bit.) [ Clarifying notes by rfheeter are enclosed in brackets like this.]

      >From: johncobb@emx.cc.utexas.edu (John W. Cobb)
      >Risto Kaivola wrote:

      [[ Sorry I don't have the date or full reference for this anymore;
      this article appeared in sci.physics.fusion a few months ago.]]

      >>Basically, what is aneutronic fusion? The term aneutronic
      >>confuses me considerably. Could you give me an example of
      >>an aneutronic fusion reaction? How could energy be produced
      >>using such a reaction? Can there be a fusion reaction in which
      >>a neutron is never emitted?
      >
      >Examples:
      >
      >D + He3 --> He4 + p + 18.1MeV
      >(deuteron + helium-3 --> helium-4 + proton + energy)
      >
      >p + Li6 --> He4 + He3 + 4.0MeV
      >(proton + lithium-6 --> helium-4 + helium-3 + energy)
      >
      >D + Li6 --> 2 He4 + 22.4MeV
      >(deuteron + lithium-6 --> 2 helium-4's + energy)
      >
      >p + B11 --> 3 He4 + 8.7Mev
      >(proton + boron-11 --> 3 helium-4's + energy)
      >
      >All of these reactions produce no neutrons directly.
      [[ Hence "aneutronic." ]]
      >There are also other reactions that have multiple branches possible,
      >some of which do not produce neutrons and others that do
      >(e.g., D + D, p + Li7).
      >
      >The question is how do you get a "reactor" going and not get
      >any neutrons. There are 2 hurdles here. The first is getting the
      >fuel to smack together hard enough and often enough for fusion
      >to occur.
      >The easiest fusion reaction is D + T --> He4 + n (the D-T fuel
      >cycle). A magnetic reactor can initiate fusion in one of these
      >things at about a temperature of 10keV.
      [1 keV = 1000 eV = 11,000,000 (degrees) kelvin, more or less].
      >The other reactions require much higher temperatures (for example
      >about 50KeV for the D+He3 reaction). This is a big factor of 5.
      >The second hurdle is neutron production via "trash" (secondary)
      >reactions. That is, the main reaction may be neutron-free,
      >but there will be pollution reactions that may emit neutrons.
      [ The products of the main reaction, e.g. He3, can be trapped in
      your reactor temporarily, and fuse with other ions in the system
      in messy ways. ]
      >Even if this is only a few percent, it can lead to big neutron
      >emission. For example, the D+He3 reaction will also have some D+D
      >reactions occuring.
      [ Because in your reactor you will have a lot of Ds and He3s, and
      the Ds will collide with each other as well as with the He3s. ]
      >At 50Kev temperatures, the reaction
      >cross-section for D+D reactions is about 1/2 of the D+He3
      >cross-section, so there will be some generation of neutrons from
      >the 50% branch reaction of D + D-->He3 + n.
      >Also, the other 50% goes to T+p, The triton (T) will then undergo
      >a D-T reaction and release another neutron.
      [ Because the cross-section for D-T reactions is much higher.]
      >If the reactor is optmized (run in a He3 rich mode) the number
      >of neutrons can be minimized. The neutron power can be as low
      >as about 5% of the total. However, in a 1000 megawatt reactor,
      >5% is 50 MW of neutron power. That is [still] a lot of neutron
      >irradiation. This lower neutron level helps in designing
      >structural elements to withstand neutron bombardment, but it
      >still has radiation consequences.
      >
      >On the other hand, it is my understanding that the p-B11 reaction
      >is completely neutron free, but of course it is much har

    12. Re:Recycled emerging technologies. by enkidu · · Score: 1
      And harddisk size, and backbone bandwidth, and the number of internet nodes, and the cost/performance of tech, etc. Any evolutionary process progresses at an exponential rate if you just observe history.

      Exponential: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Go back and look at history, there may be rapid, pseudo exponential growth during the initial stages of technology and life (Cambrian explosion comes to mind) but inevitably, the laws of physics and the limits of resources cause a slowdown. I know of no examples of an old technology (or "evolutionary process") which is still undergoing exponential growth/improvement.

      --

      There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
      -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
  15. Clean surface by nuggz · · Score: 1

    You bet it will be big.
    Non stick baking pans are just the beginning.
    No wax cars.
    No clean windows, HUGE issue on skyscrapers

    Oh yeah, and the fact it will mean a significant breakthrough in technology is nice too.

    1. Re:Clean surface by grub · · Score: 1

      What about no-lube, dishwasher-safe butt-plugs?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Clean surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No clean windows, HUGE issue on skyscrapers"

      You know what the funny part is?

      The Window Washer's union will make architects an offer they can't refuse, thereby preventing this material from being used.

      (Meanwhile, computer dorks everywhere will sit around and whine about job loss, while refusing to unionize.)

  16. Re:today in MIT Geology 101 by justfred · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, that certainly puts to shame the troll comment that first came to my mind.

    Around here, one of the euphemisms for using the potty (i.e. "dropping the kids off at the pool", "downloading some files", etc.) is "going to a conference on emerging technologies".

  17. GE's China and India competition? by cpopin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of General Electric: "China and India will be strong international competitors, while the Internet levels the playing field for price."

    Part of leadership is personal. Immelt said, "People in the organization need to feel you're a part of their life, that they're a phone call away from the top of the company. They need to be able to trust the organization's command chain to pass information in an unfiltered way."


    As a former GE employee I can say GE is an innovator in outsourcing competition to China and India. I'd like to make a phone call to the top of the company: "Hey, could you please stop sending American jobs overseas?"

    The board will award Immelt 250,000 performance share units (PSUs) with a present value of $7.5 million -- 8.5% more than Immelt's 2002 salary and bonus.
    ...he already makes $6.9 million in bonuses and salary...

    Source: RatcliffeBlog

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
    1. Re:GE's China and India competition? by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Insightful


      They are not American jobs. They are GE jobs.

    2. Re:GE's China and India competition? by cpopin · · Score: 1

      Yes, they're all GE jobs. Only now the Minnesota employees that have worked at the twenty year old company ITI, purchased from GE one year ago and renamed the GE Interlogix Division, have lost their jobs to overseas outsourcing. The IT employees have been replaced with Indian employees and the blue-collar workers with Mexican workers.

      So you're right, they're not longer American jobs. They're Indian and Mexican jobs. And all because ITI built a better home and office security system then GE. If you can't beat them, buy them and ship their jobs out of the country.

      --
      -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  18. Flying Cars? by CowboyNick · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where are the flying cars? I want my flying cars!!!

    --
    -CowboyNick
    1. Re:Flying Cars? by IWishIWasSmart · · Score: 1

      Yea, flying car so there will be no need for air bags or seat belts

  19. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK... you can store hydrogen densly in metal matrix form, IIRC. I think you have to heat the matrix to release it, but it's been ages since I looked at it. You may not need to "get back" the electricity if you burn it as a fuel, eg BMW's H2 powered 7-series of many years ago. There's plenty of other way s to generate power too, solar, wind, and wave come to mind.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  20. They promised me flying cars!!! by tjstork · · Score: 1


    I got enough "dumb" dust to last so long I don't know when I'll need "smart" dust!

    I want my flying cars and my person spaceship.

    --
    This is my sig.
  21. what about the sludge powered car by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0

    talk about nice use of human waste.

    take a crap and you are contributing to out energy stores.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  22. Pictures here by xyote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    here under Photo Gallery. I'll let you pass your own judgement.

  23. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you are WAY behind the times.

    the point of hydrogen is not a source of energy, but a place to store energy. so we make hydrogen by electrolosys at some huge nuclear facility. then we can turn that huge energy source into a portable energy source. we can make it even more practicle by making a metalic hydride, then just pump the hydride dust into your tank and boom, you have power.

    another alternative to hydrogen would be the use of fast growing plants to create ethanol and then use the enthanol in the fuel cells. the net carbon placed into the atmosphear this way would be 0 since the plants need it to grow each season any way.

    I personaly like the latter option, but we need to find a way to make a ton of ethanol with out impacting on the land a whole lot. hydroponics mabye?

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  24. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    the most efficent way of making solor power would be to tunr a seasonal plant into ethanol. the net effect on carbon levels is zero since you are just replacing the carbon that was used during growth, and if you have a continuous growth cycle that keeps up with energy demands, then you are not affecting the environment in any way at all. it takes carbon to make plants, perhaps grass would be a good choice since it grows like crazy, or mabye bamboo since it can make a huge regrowth in a few weeks giving you a lot of hydrocarbons in a short time.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  25. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    True. IIRC, rapeseed and sun-flowers and similar are apparently the shiznit for producing bio-diesel, and there's no reason that the same can't happen for ethanol with other fuels.

    It makes a lot of sense, hugely reduces processing, is cleaner, and is renewable.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  26. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont forget hemp/marijuana seeds. they can be used as an easy source of bio fuel. and it would be easy to grow huge amounts of. i know that a year or 2 ago there was a mercedes crusing the U.S. running on bio fuel from hemp. it was original a diesel engine, and i guess it took very few modifications to convert.

  27. Re: "and boom, you have power" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't use the word "boom" when talking about hydrogen. ;-)

  28. Re:today in MIT Geology 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Around here, one of the euphemisms for using the potty (i.e. "dropping the kids off at the pool", "downloading some files", etc.) is "going to a conference on emerging technologies".

    And don't forget "dumping core"...

  29. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

    we need to find a way to make a ton of ethanol with out impacting on the land a whole lot

    Get frat boys to donate blood?

    --
    On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
  30. The future is non proprietary and patent free by argoff · · Score: 1

    The simple fact is that patnets have no place in the future of commerce and business. In fact, even today they are rarely good for anything but defensive purposes against useless litigation and cross licensing. Just like the PC era exploded specifically because nobody could patent interfaces, the next generation of technology is going to take the same route.

  31. Hey I need a partner. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Let's put forth the abolish-patents (and copyright) meme for every related story (about one in two here).

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Hey I need a partner. by argoff · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. It's amazing the kind of abuse people will lay on you for pointing out simple facts about property and information. (even from open source gurus) Us people who understand that patents and copyrights suck need to team up and make some publicity.

      BTW, type in "against copyrights" in any internet search engine and you will likely see my bitter protest against copyrights right up there. (I also rewrote it and put it in a journal under slashdot user ~myprotest) But I've been searching for more effective ways.....

  32. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by labradort · · Score: 1

    Yes, I agree with another poster saying this is way behind the times. Always remember there were times when people questioned the practicality of all technology, even the computer you are using to see this and participate at Slashdot. Cars and traffic control, electric street lights in every town, etc., all had problems and issues and have been handled in some way.

    During the last great black out, there was a business that still had power in southern Ontario. Stuart Energy Systems. It was from a hydrogen powered UPS system they develop and sell. Check them out:

    http://www.stuartenergy.com

    Also check out Ballard Power systems:

    http://www.ballard.com

    These companies have been around for a number of years now. It is emerging, only on the sense that it is about to become a more consumer level product, but these things have been field tested and there are city buses running on hydrogen fuel cells, etc.

    Fuel cells are far more efficient at energy transformation than internal combustion engines. I don't have the exact figures on hand but I believe I've heard that a gasoline engine is about 26% efficient while fuel cell provides about 90% efficiency.

    Electricity generation is a different issue. There are many ways to generate it. Hydrogen power is about storing and transporting this energy, not about generating it.

    You could argue that we should just use oil and gas, but I happen to have heard there is a finite amount of this.

  33. the borg or trevor goodchild by V_drive · · Score: 1

    "We have already evolved so much, our actions would be incomprehensible to a human from a thousand years ago, it's the evolution revolution. Tomorrow we speed up the process, all sectors, all species. Only the strong shall evolve."

    --Trevor Goodchild

    --
    char *mySig;
  34. +1 Funny by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I find it sad that nobody has modded you up yet.

  35. Replicators by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    If replication is so easy, why hasn't a replicator been built at the macro scale?

    This is one of the key questions. So far as I can tell the key problem is that, unless you specify your feed-stock / parts-supply you haven't really defined the problem.

    For example, it would be relatively easy to build a replicator to function in an envirionment that consisted of a 50/50 mixture of tested-snap-together-replicator-tops and tested-snap-together-replicator-bottoms (batteries included). But there's no point to doing this. (A fact which hasn't stopped people from doing it.)

    On the other extreme, so far as we know it would be impossible to build a replicator that used nothing but vacuum for parts.

    So what makes a useful feed stock? Modular parts that are 1) well standardized, 2) easy to manipulate, 3) hard to damage, 4) cheaply and readily availible to the replicator, to start with. Further, at least some of the parts need to be able to able to store and convert energy, and some of them need to be able to store and process information. All of the replicators we know of build themselves from parts that meet these criteria, which occur naturally in their environment. (For example: fax-humour-pages replicate by using paper, ink, people, and fax machines--all of which are more or less standardized, easy to manipulate, hard to damage (from the perspective of a fax-joke), and cheaply & readily available. I'll leave it up to you to decide where the energy and information processing comes from.)

    But the "why hasn't a replicator been built at the macro scale" question is really asking "why hasn't a replicator that uses primative raw materials been built at the macro scale" and the answer is that primative raw materials at the macro scale don't meet the critera for good feed stock. Atoms do (which is why we should expect nanotechnology), provided that the replicator is small enough that atoms are easy for it to manipulate.

    Thus we should not expect to see any macro scale replicators using primative parts, and we don't. Ellephants, for example, rely of feed-stock produced by other organisms. Note that they are not even big replicators; they are big vehicles built by (and serving the interests of) nano-scale replicators.

    -- MarkusQ

  36. Dell might try lisening to himself by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    CEO Dell said Dell Corp. doesn't want to reinvent technology it can get from partners.

    And then he goes off and builds an MP3 player and a music store. No other companies that have done THAT yet, eh Mr. Dell? Guess he doesn't want to share as much as the quote above would indicate.

    The funny thing is that they mention the new music service and consumer devices just two paragraphs later!!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  37. Micropayments for email.. by The+Baron+Dev · · Score: 0

    "Solomon envisions micropayments to network service providers attached to every email message as a means of defeating spam."

    How much would he like to charge for useless Slashdot posts ? ;-)

  38. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1
    ...I remember you needed roughly twice the electricity to make the Hydrogen than you get back...

    I was wondering that too... but I'd consider things like vast arrays of floating solar cells, you can pepper miles upon miles of ocean with'em (not enough for a person to walk on, just enough to capture the sun light), and have them somehow grid the generated elecriticy to where it will be used to generate hydrogen.

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  39. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    It takes up too much space for one thing; unles you're going to use Liquid Hydrogen which takes a lot of energy to keep cool.

    Er, why do you need to cool the H2 to minimise volume? Why not just keep it under pressure?

    but I remember you needed roughly twice the electricity to make the Hydrogen than you get back when you run the car. That's fine if you're running on Hydroelectric dams, but what about all the cars in areas where they have coal or Nuclear Power Plants?

    You have to compare this ratio to the amount of energy you can extract from the tank of dead dinosaur in a car. Generating power centrally in power stations should in theory be more efficient at extracting energy, and also means that there are individual sources where pollution can be more easily controlled - hopefully meaning that pollution can both be reduced and directed where it is least harmful.

  40. Why not... by tqft · · Score: 1

    use direct sunlight?

    My idea (use it distribute it for the greater good if it is worth it):

    Rather than convert to electricity using solar cells (adding an expensive inefficient step) why simply focus sunlight using molded plastic panels (over the ocean) that let sea water seep in the bottom with a collecting station sucking in the hydrogen oxygen mix - at about 1500degC water dissociates (IIRC). Only real problem is keeping the H and O separate until you can store them separately. Then pipe ashore to markets. Reuse them oil rigs and pipeline infrastructure.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  41. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by njh · · Score: 1

    I submitted a story on using Boron as an alternative energy carrier, but it was rejected. Woe is me. Anyway, here's the interesting link:
    http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.htm l

    Boron is inert both in energetic form (boron) and dead form (boron oxide glass). It is very energy dense and you can recycle the combustion product using a straightforward sequence of reactions.

  42. Re:Hydrogen? Er... by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

    Yah, weed and ethanol-bearing plants grown in the same facility! Err... scratch that. I'm opening a hydroponics facility right now so that I can grow some... uhmm... plants... to... uhmm... make some... uhmm... ethanol so I can get... uhmm... h... uhmm... to work... ok? Oh, that? That's a special type of fern!

    --
    Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  43. which version... by null-sRc · · Score: 1

    ... of gentoo are they running???

    MIT Emerging Technologies Conference ... yet, when i type emerge -s Technologies Conference

    i don't get any results :(

    maybe i need to emerge sync.. hmm ill try that :D

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
  44. Read the journal. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    By the way, I'll be sending you an invoice for using my idea linking slavery to "intellectual property". I patented it! I think the slavery angle is so dead-on in many ways. The opponents calling us unrealistic utopians. The compromisers. Others are using it too. Let this meme catch on!

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist