Slashdot Mirror


New Palm Lineup Reviewed: Tungsten T3 & E, Zire 21

Geartest.com writes "PalmOne (AKA Palm) launched three new handhelds today: The Tungsten T3, Tungsten E and Zire 21. Without going on at length about the features of every model, the T3 has 64 MB RAM, a 320x480 display that rotates from portrait to landscape mode, a software writing area that slides out of the way when you aren't using it, built-in Bluetooth, a voice recorder, and Palm OS 5.2.1 that runs on an Intel XScale 400 MHz processor, which Sony dropped from the top-end CLIE in favor of its own silicon. InfoSyncWorld reviews the Tungsten T3, Tungsten E and Zire 21. PalmInfocenter also has a T3 review. ZDNet UK has a Tungsten T3 preview. And the Detroit Free Press has an overview of all three devices."

190 comments

  1. A review can also be found by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    1. Re:A review can also be found by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      What are you proud of your Bluffing? (Score:1, Interesting) first post!
      Sir Haxalot provides an article on the flip-side
      No...it was that I sent in the article.

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    2. Re:A review can also be found by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And your mother would be proud if you only cleaned up the basement like she asked.
      I live in England, I don't have a basement :P

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    3. Re:A review can also be found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I am sure you are eating your mother's badly packed kebab.

    4. Re:A review can also be found by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Then I am sure you are eating your mother's badly packed kebab.
      I don't understand. Explain, please.

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
  2. all in all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    palm's os isn't that bad and the hardware is great but i think i'll stick with my ipaq...plenty of software for PPC 2002 & hell you can't get everquest for the palm....

  3. But the big question is: by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Do any of them have a console and the ability to run an onboard C (cross)compiler?

    If not, I'll stick with my Zaurus.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:But the big question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can find one at Amazon cheaper than at Barnes and Noble!

    2. Re:But the big question is: by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      What about GCC for Palm OS? I've never used it, but I'm going to give it a try on my Clie sometime... Since Palm doesn't have their own C++ compiler, this looks like the best option.

    3. Re:But the big question is: by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Oooh... An onboard compiler... Ooops... Aaaand... Yay for SourceForge.

    4. Re:But the big question is: by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      OnboardC is a self-hosted C dev environment for PalmOS. Consoles, well... I personally think having a console on a PDA is akin to having ejection seats in a helicopter, but whatever floats your HCI boat I guess. ;)

    5. Re:But the big question is: by theridersofrohan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      For whom is this a big question? Who would want to run a cross compiler on a handheld? Would that be more than 5 people?


      And actually there is a compiler (not cross though) for the palmos. OnboardC. Open source too!


      I'm very eager to get my hands on the T3 :-)

    6. Re:But the big question is: by daves · · Score: 1

      Do any of them have a console and the ability to run an onboard C (cross)compiler?

      Well, there is a FORTH (cross) compiler.

      Real men don't need C.

      --
      People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
    7. Re:But the big question is: by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have both a Palm VIIx (got from work) and a Zaurus SL-C750 (also from work). When I got the Zaurus I seriously considered dumping the Palm, but I havn't yet. While the Zaurus is much _much_ more power, it is not nearly as polished (I'm running the English hacked ROM from the Cacko team) as the Palm. The address book and scheduler just aren't there yet on the Zaurus. The keyboard input is great, but their handwriting recognition is the pits, which is a pain when I swich it into PDA mode. Oddly, the Palm (which I have overclocked to 32Mhz) feels snappier. The Zaurus has this annoying delay every time you turn it on. I also have a metric crapload of third party software installed on the VIIx, and havn't been able to give up the web clipping stuff I've set up yet (this won't be a problem once those 3G Cell Modem CF cards come out though). It's slow going installing stuff on the Zaurus though, because you have to pretty much port everything yourself, since the software compiled for the 7xxx series Zaurus's tends to break the 7x0 series.

      On the other hand, the Zaurus has a lot of cool features. My officemate transcoded the LOTR movie into a WMV he can play directly off of an IBM microdrive (it looks _nice_). The Zaurus has a full web browser (Opera) including a PDF reader, which is nice when I'm close enough to an 802.11b access point to use it. The screen completely blows away the Palm (640x480!) which is nice for ebook reading (although there are no ebook readers for the Zaurus that can hold a candle to Weasel AFAIK. I've been HTMLifying the books and using Opera, which is suboptimal). The terminal on the Zaurus is very nice, although the keyboard is not designed for terminal work (^V sends a paste, although ^C works ask you'd expect, although to even get control you have to remap the kana key.

      Overall, both devices are nice, but neither eclipses the other's functionality at this point. I don't like how the Zaurus has it's built in battery, I much prefer using rechargable AAAs like the Palm so I can swap them out when they get low. This has been an annoyance because the Zaurus is rather power hungry and you have to keep the charging brick around if you want to use it for more than a few hours at a time, unlike the Palm where I can read an entire ebook before I need to replace the battery. I know the battery will be expensive to replace when it wears out too.

      Hmm, that's pretty rambling. Lets just say that different people will prefer different devices based on their needs.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:But the big question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is call codewarrior only $599

    9. Re:But the big question is: by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Have you tried OpieReader? I reformat ebooks with OO.o, save them as HTML, run them through Plucker, and read that with OpieReader. It is MUCH quicker on the Z 5500 than plucker is on my m515 at work.

    10. Re:But the big question is: by jandrese · · Score: 1

      That's one of those applications that screw up the 7x0 series. It's designed for a smaller screen (and one that cannot be rotated), so when you load it up the Zaurus has to resample the pixels and it ends up looking terrible. Plus If you're in notebook mode the screen is sideways. These also tend to screw up the fonts on the Zaurus, which means you have to reboot to get it working again.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    11. Re:But the big question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I much prefer using rechargable AAAs like the Palm
      Does any Palm unit use AAA's any more?
  4. Tung Pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't they call these things Tung-Pilots? Come to think of it, that would imply a revolutionary way of inputting data into the things.

    1. Re:Tung Pilot? by jmorse · · Score: 1

      ...because my girlfriend already copyrighted the name to describe me.

      --

      "You done taken a wrong turn."
      -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    2. Re:Tung Pilot? by roalt · · Score: 1
      Why don't they call these things Tung-Pilots?...

      Maybe, because it sounds too much like a Korean war veteran?

  5. These things look pretty sweet. by Sheetrock · · Score: 1

    I was wondering when we'd finally see 128MB in a palmtop system. I'm kind of torn between getting one of these or a Tablet PC, although I suppose I'm inclined towards the latter because of the size and speed as well as the ease of use of Windows CE and compatibility that platform offers.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      Tablet PC doesn't run Windows CE. I have both a Palm and a Compaq TC1000 Tablet PC. Get the T3. Trust me.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    2. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howabout a Zaurus? you can easily throw in a 128m SD card.

    3. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by mblase · · Score: 1

      I was wondering when we'd finally see 128MB in a palmtop system.

      Most folks don't need that much memory unless they're storing multimedia files. However, you can easily buy memory cards for many Palm devices (not sure about these new ones, though) with 128MB or more of additional storage.

    4. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 2, Informative

      2 problems with the Tablets.

      1. They're shit slow. The top-end ones run P-III Mobile 1GHz CPU's. No CD-ROM, no expandability.

      2. They run Windows XP Tablet Edition (Which is a variant of Home).

      Get a thin laptop with a Centrino or P4-M CPU instead and see some real performance and portability. Oh, and they're way cheaper than the Tablets

      Or get a cheap beast (Like my base-model Thinkpad G40) for the price of a high-end PDA.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    5. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm inclined towards the latter because of the size and speed as well as the ease of use of Windows CE and compatibility that platform offers.
      TROLL ALERT! Don't bite, kiddies. While you're composing your rational arguments of how Linux is so much better than Windows, this person is busy jacking off. Move along. You are not going to do any good around here.
    6. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1
      I'm inclined towards the latter because of the size and speed

      What, big-and-clunky, and slow?

      The tablet devices I've seen are the pits. They're slow as molasses, the pen interface blows (try right-clicking on something), and they're heavy as heck.

      ease of use of Windows CE

      OK, sorry, I didn't realize you were joking...you should have added a couple of smileys.

    7. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by NickDngr · · Score: 2, Informative

      2. They run Windows XP Tablet Edition (Which is a variant of Home).

      Actually, it is "a superset of Windows XP Professional"

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    8. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      As was already mentioned, XP Tablet is a variant of Pro.
      Acer has a Centrino Travelmate available

      I know. This message typed with a Travelmate C102Ti

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    9. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Hmm, wasn't aware Tablet could join domains. That sucks less then.

      And how much more is the Centrino Tablet than a stock Centrino box? Last I checker, you were payeing a 100% cost penalty for performance, minimum, with tablets. Not counting the lack of Cardbus and optical drives common to most tablets.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    10. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      My one concern with the new Palms is the "Graffiti 2" recognition software - you can try a demo at this site and it's really annoying for a long term palm user like myself who's very, very comfortable with standard graffiti, eg.:

      "t" and "k" are completely different

      the unofficial strokes for "d" (backwards [shortcut]), "y" (Greek gamma) and "v" (backwards "v") don't work

      "i" is now "l", etc ...

      It looks a lot slower, too (requiring multiple strokes for several characters). Does anyone with one of these devices know if traditional Graffiti is supplied, is compatible or is possible to emulate? I've been thinking of replacing my old IIIx for a while now, and I've got to say that apart from the graffiti issue the T3 looks exceptionally nice (finally providing 320x480 and a virtual graffiti area :)

    11. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since you have a IIIx you can use the Graffiti Replacement Trick. The reason Palm moved to Graffiti 2 is because Xerox sued Palm over a unistroke character patent.

      -- iCEBaLM

    12. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Does anyone with one of these devices know if traditional Graffiti is supplied, is compatible or is possible to emulate?

      According to PalmInfocenter's review, it is.

      I'm getting a Zire 71 later this week (in transit), and I'll let you know how hard it is to make the shift.

      Two nice alterations that comes with G2 are a better way to write capitals, and the posibility to use graffitti anywhere on the screen--which is quite a nice advancement, IMO.

    13. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by Trongy · · Score: 1

      If you read the article referred to you will see that the original grafiti needs to be grabbed from a Palm OS 5 machine such as a Tungsten T or certain models of Sony Clie. Works well though.

    14. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      FWIW, you can write captitals in the middle with normal graffiti using the hack "MiddleCaps" ...

    15. Re:These things look pretty sweet. by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      You'll need the Graffiti from an OS 5 device. Can be found on the net with a little hunting.

  6. Good review by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    A good review can be found at The Palm Information Center They also have strong coverage of the Palm OS in general.

    1. Re:Good review by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's such a good review, it's linked in the story. Reading comprehension is your friend.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  7. We should be giving these things to kids. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Looking at the spec of the new Palm machines (and noting that they are finally in Newton territory), a thought struck me: these are the machines we should give to kids in grade school. Forget laptops.

    The processor has some oomph, there are multimedia capabilities, there is wireless; you don't need a hard drive. Install a nice object-oriented developer package and let them learn early programming on the Palm. The lack of hard drive makes it tougher, and cheaper to replace all-around. Take assignments on SD cards (or whatever). Imagine kids scribbling their coding assignments into Palms on the bus.

    When I think about it, I find it surprising no one has implemented such a program... can't think of any immediate downsides.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the most annoying person in the world. 'finally in Newton territory'? The thing runs at 20Mhz.

      And most kids aren't even interested in programming, let alone with an 'object oriented developer package'!

      FYAD.

    2. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      There are a few downsides. Public schools lack funding to buy a bunch of these things, unless they get a killer discount. I've tried writing some C++ on my Clie, and it's a pain to write for extended periods of time without a keyboard. Also, these would get stolen pretty easily. The screens on these are not the toughest, so you would wind up with a lot of mangled screens (similar to what I did to my crappy cell phone). Also, administrating all of these would be a pain in the ass. Kids would play around with the reset button, lose the stylus, etc.

    3. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by mblase · · Score: 1

      these are the machines we should give to kids in grade school. Forget laptops.

      Obvious drawbacks: Writing with a stylus isn't as intuitive as a keyboard. Small screens get hard on the eyes after a while. And, of course, they're nearly impossible to write a term paper on.

      Laptops are there to help kids work. Handhelds exist as portable PIMs and carriers of data, but no one in their right might would try to do serious work on one exclusively.

    4. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by baka_boy · · Score: 1

      I don't agree that keyboards are more intuitive -- familiar, yes, but hardly a natural exercise for young students who may well still be working on their handwriting.

      I agree that trying to do any significant amount of data entry or editing on a palmtop becomes frustrating quickly; however, I think that's much more a product of their small form factor than any inherent design problems.

      If you want to see where this could go, just look at the eMate -- Apple took a standard Newton mobo and display and packaged it up with a keyboard in a compact, ruggedized enclosure. And they were even targetted to schools.

      True, they were a market failure, but largely for the same reasons the original Newton was: they were trying to create a market that didn't exist yet, the technology was too new, and therefore too expensive, etc. It's a very different marketplace now, even in the educational sector.

    5. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Laptops are there to help kids work. Handhelds exist as portable PIMs and carriers of data, but no one in their right might would try to do serious work on one exclusively.

      Get a keyboard for them. PDA + Full size folding keyboard = $300 "kid computer."

      That's more than enough for just about every general-purpose school assignmet. If they need to do more--coding, office skills, et cetera--they can have a lab.

      (And, really, it's not like getting the stili-strokes is all that hard, or lacking an easy reference...)

    6. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by baka_boy · · Score: 1

      I actually thought about this idea some time back, when everyone started started clearing out refurb Handspring Visor models for less than $50. Add some sort of wireless, and appropriate add-ons for tasks like lab data acquisition or sound output, and you have an all-purpose educational computing tool.

      Software development on that kind of device is still a huge pain, though. Think about it: how many developers do you know who work on anything less than the largest (either in size or number) available display surface they can? The information visibility needed for real coding is just too high to fit well onto a palmtop's display.

      Now, resurrect HyperCard as a PalmOS app, and we can talk.

    7. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by firewood · · Score: 2, Informative
      these are the machines we should give to kids in grade school. Forget laptops.

      PalmOS devices for the educational market? Alphasmart agrees with you.

    8. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by Eight+01 · · Score: 1

      There is a Palm "laptop" which is similar to the eMate. It is called the Alphasmart Dana. There is also a wireless model available. Alphasmart Dana

    9. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Public schools lack funding to buy a bunch of these things, unless they get a killer discount."

      I know how to solve that. Ditch textbooks. They are such a waste in terms of budgeted monies. Get a license to purchase the text books on PDF and require the license allow for students to print their own copies without running into copyright issues. But of course the publishers will never allow that. Look for some type of rebellion at the universities first before it spreads down to K-12 education.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    10. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      While I was in Japan I did all my software development on my clie. You can take a look at what I generated at my site. There's some good CS stuff and a very nice (IMHO) puzzle program.

      Actually, it did everything I needed. I could edit programs and listen to music at the same time. Needless to say, however, it's nice to have my Athlon 3000+ too :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    11. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by deniable · · Score: 1

      These guys talk about using handhelds in education. Being able to catch Cooties from your Palm is a little distrubing though.

    12. Re:We should be giving these things to kids. by iamfireballs · · Score: 0

      as a matter of fact, the Niles Middle School in Niles, MI recently experimented with this idea. Shortly before they proceeded to use laptops. I personally think its an enormouse waste of money considering the state of adult education in Michigan, but I guess we are looking to the future. :laugh: or something.

      --
      I like the parts where these old yahooties tolchok each other and then drink their Hebrew vino and getting on to the bed
  8. New Sony Clies too by generic-man · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sony also announced two Clies today, which cost $200 and $250 respectively. Not bad, but not revolutionary.

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:New Sony Clies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent contains a goatse.cx link. Please do not click. Thank you.

    2. Re:New Sony Clies too by firewood · · Score: 1
      Also note that the two new Sony Clie models, the TJ25 and TJ35, have rebates available, which can reduce the net cost to $180 and $220, respectively. See the sony style web site for details.

      The new Sony models also use a faster processor (200 MHz Motorola MX) than the new Palm Zire21 and Tungsten|E (126 MHz TI OMAP) models.

  9. Where's the 802.11 B? by Schlemphfer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've been on the sidelines ever since PDA's came out. They always seemed like a nice thing to have, but they've either been too expensive or too toylike to be worth buying. The original Zire caught my eye, but with a 33 Mhz processor and 2 megs RAM, it just seemed like a pathetically underpowered unit.

    The 21 seems to rectify those problems with being underpowered. I'm sure that in a month or so, you'll be able to buy refurbished 21's for $80 or so. At that point I might finally cave in and get one.

    What surprises me, and the thing that's kept me on the sidelines so long, is that none of the units offer 802.11 B. A friend of mine has a Handspring with an 802.11 B card, and speaks the world of it. I bet a lot of folks would jump in and start using PDA's, when 802.11 B becomes a standard feature.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Palm Tungsten C ($500) and Sony Clie UX-50 ($700) include Wi-Fi. High chip cost and battery consumption are the main reasons why Wi-Fi is not yet standard on your average PDA.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Forget that, I want internet access from nearly anywhere. I wish someone would combine the 24/7 internet connectivity of the T-Mobile HipTop with a Palm-style PDA.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    3. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      My Treo 270 can do GPRS Internet access, which is always on. Other Palm OS Internet-capable phones include the Palm Tungsten W and Kyocera 7135.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes a goatse.cx link "terrifying"?

    5. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1
      High chip cost and battery consumption are the main reasons why Wi-Fi is not yet standard on your average PDA.

      I think the main reason why WiFi isn't standard on average PDA is this: it's useless!

      Surfing the net on a screen three inches across is just not nearly as fun as surfing the net on anything larger.

      Any time I'm near a wireless hotspot, I'll either be in my home or office, where I'll have either a desktop or laptop, or I'll be carrying my laptop.

      My Palm handheld is good for a lot of things, but surfing is not one of them. Or doing email.

    6. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by RedX · · Score: 1

      WiFi can certainly be used for much more than web surfing or email. As mentioned above, there are terminal apps and other such tools for Palm OS that a system admin could use with a WiFi connection. Wireless sync is cool too, and while composing email might be a pain for many with no keyboard, it's still pretty handy to receive and read email while away from the desk.

    7. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by akuma(x86) · · Score: 1

      802.11B is notoriously power ineffecient for the PDA power envelope.

      Wait until Broadcom's new 802.11 chipset starts to proliferate. They've apparently solved some of the major power issues.

    8. Re:Where's the 802.11 B? by JLester · · Score: 1

      A little utility called "NetChaser" is also great on my Tungsten C for scanning available Wi-Fi network (both for my company and for curiosity purposes).

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  10. Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's about time woke up and smelled the price points, man.

    For a while, you've been able to pick up a very good PocketPC device for around $200- currently the Dell Axim X5 Basic, and before that the iPAQ 3100 series (all the usual 3600 specs, but with a B&W screen, 16 MB of RAM instead of 32). Both of those PPC devices are very capable little PDAs that can just about do it all.

    Palm, on the other hand, has only tossed us some pretty crappy bones for a cheaper Palm device. Yeah, you could get a Palm m130 for $200 (now $180), or the low-end Zire for $100. However, both of these models are pretty limited. The m130 has an old, slow processor (although, it still displays PDFs faster than my 400 MHz Zaurus C760, or a 206 MHz/400 MHz WinCE device), little RAM, and a small, non-reflective screen. The m130 has a limited SD slot and the Palm serial connection. For the same price, you could get a PocketPC device with 3x the screen real-estate, 4x the RAM, 5-10x the processor speed and 3 expansion options (SD, CF, serial), usable for various networking options and memory upgrades.

    However, it seems Palm is finally putting out something

    In a way, this model has the potential to be the company's iMac analogue. When you think of it, the PocketPC vs Palm race parallels the Microsoft vs Apple one. I'll put the MS vs Apple in parens:

    1. Palm (Apple) comes out with a superior product at first: the first Palm PDA (the original Mac 128K).
    2. Microsoft comes out with an inferior product as a reaction to #1: WinCE 1.0 devices (MS Windows 1.0).
    3. Palm (Apple) keeps on moving forward, doing incremental updates, eventually arriving at the Palm III (Mac OS 6).
    4. MS finally gets a larger chunk of its act together, gets a better hardware platform, puts out PocketPC. (Win 95)
    5. MS and PocketPC starts to claim territory that was once very clearly PalmOS-land.
    6. Does a CPU and general archetecture upgrade, moving from dead-end m68k CPUs to ARM-based chips. (Apple goes from m68k to PowerPC.)
    7. Palm sticks to a friendly to use, but somewhat ugly to code for and quite primitive internally OS, while Microsoft has had something resembling a "real" OS for a while. (Apple sticks to its primitive-cored Mac OS 9, MS has NT, 2k, 9x [although they suck just as much ass as OS 9, even though they look better on paper].)
    8. Palm comes out with the Tungsten E, which provides almost all of the features of a more expensive PDA for a lot less. (Apple comes out with the iMac, pretty much all the features you need, but for cheaper.) ...9. What's next? Here's to hoping the story continues on this line- I'd use a Palm device if PalmOS wasn't so primitive. I want/need a pocket computer, not an expensive organizer, and before the PalmOS can fill that need, it will need to be able to do a couple those little features we take for granted in a real OS, like multitasking. :) Will PalmOS 6 be the analogue to Apple's OS X?

    Of course, this is totally ignoring the Newton, which is where Palm did well to steal a lot of ideas for PalmOS, although ignoring a handful of very important architectural elements. I also ignore all name changes, referring to USR, Palm, PalmOne, etc just as "Palm."

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    1. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, PPC means PowerPC, not PocketPC. It was a source of great confusion for me for a moment there (too much blood in my caffeine stream.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by firewood · · Score: 1
      Of course, this is totally ignoring the Newton, which is where Palm did well to steal a lot of ideas for PalmOS, although ignoring a handful of very important architectural elements.

      Also ignoring several design elements that resulted in the Newton being a very unprofitable and low volume seller (versus over 30 million PalmOS devices sold).

    3. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      My mention had nothing to do with how successful the Newton was- I simply mentioned it so no one would see my over simplification as ignorance.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      PPC means both PowerPC and PocketPC. I was a Mac user before PocketPC existed (not that is any achievement, isn't meant as a claim on one), and I too had to get used to that. "PPC" in the PocketPC/WindowsCE community is a pretty common abbreviation. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pa1mOne, you insensitive clod.

    6. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      "I want/need a pocket computer..."

      Then buy a PocketPC. What I want is a PDA that can also access huge amounts of data - medical references for work, plus ebooks and whatnot. I wish that someone would sell a PDA with a high-res monochrome screen that's big enough to read, an energy-efficient dragonball processor, a memory card slot and/or at least 64 megs of RAM, using AAA (or AA if they can be fit into a model small enough) batteries and getting at least two weeks with rechargable NIMH cells. I'd happily pay twice what my SJ33 cost me (it gets reasonable battery life considering, but the screen is just too tiny - at least it has a built-in cover though).

    7. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 1

      That was the Handera, almost exactly. Not suprisingly, it was a very popular choice for doctors.

    8. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by luisdom · · Score: 1

      ...features we take for granted in a real OS, like multitasking...
      It seems that the thing is able to play mp3 while doing other things, not that it is real multitasking, maybe a tsr ;)?

    9. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      The PocketPC is no more a pocket computer than the Palm.

    10. Re:Tugnsten E: Palm's iMac? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      The PocketPC is no more a pocket computer than the Palm.

      Well, it depends on how you define "pocket computer" I suppose. Yes, the Palm is a computer- the Palm Pro is as powerful as the first PCs, when were considered "real computers" in their day. But before Palm OS 6, the Palm really wasn't much of a semi-general purpose "pocket computer," not in the way that a PocketPC or Zaurus or Newton is. Things like multitasking, chunks of memory more than 32K (or 64K, as was achieved in POS5)- generally innards that vaguely resemble the design of "real OSes." (highly subjective, though)

      For a lot of people, that means a platform that can accept a port without writing a new layer that implements all of the OS-like functionality that the OS itself doesn't. On PocketPC or WinCE, Unix apps can be ported without that much work, whereas on PalmOS the work required in porting may surpass rewriting the app from scratch.

      The Newton didn't have an OS that resembled the desing of WinNT/Linux/Unix or any other "regular" OS, but it did have multitasking, which I suppose is a big part of it. The apps followed accordingly, and it could be used as a "real computer" in similar ways the PocketPC or Zaurus can- even a TeX interpreter. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  11. good lineup, pricing by mblase · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Tungsten T3 retails at about $400 (US), the Tungsten E at $200, and the Zire 21 at $100.

    Overall, it looks like the Tungsten E is the best value of Palm's offerings to date (320x320 color screen, multimedia, Graffiti 2, 32 MB of memory). For $200 more you get Bluetooth, wireless Internet, and a rotating screen; for $100 less you get a black-and-white screen and a no-frills, PIM-focused device. It really feels like Palm is listening to its users when they say what they want in a handheld.

    1. Re:good lineup, pricing by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      I think that the Zire71 is even better, besides the nice screen you also get the built-in digital camera and a joystick-shaped navigator which works very well for games...

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    2. Re:good lineup, pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Zire71 costs $100 more than the T E, is a little bigger, but has the camera. I think the T E is the better deal.

    3. Re:good lineup, pricing by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Note: A backlight is not a frill, it's an essential feature for a PDA, and an egregious oversight on Palm's part. (Zire 21)

      The T3, on the other hand, is a bad mamma-jamma.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:good lineup, pricing by cybershadow_jp · · Score: 1
      Palm is listening to its users when they say what they want in a handheld.

      i only wish that palm would once again release japanese-version models

      i know that they did lose the palm wars to sony a couple years back, which is why the last japanese palm model was the m515... but with the new tungstens - im quite sure they'd have sony run for their money

  12. Now I can get organized! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I can get organized! Wait.. where's that damn Palm thing again.... *fumbling around*

  13. Warning: no backlight on Zire 21 by mbessey · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bought one of these to replace my wife's ailing M100. I was pretty surprised to find out that it doesn't have a backlight. What the hell were they thinking?

    True, it doesn't include "backlight" anywhere on the list of features on the side of the box, but since (almost) every other Palm OS organizer ever made has a backlight, it's not like I would have expected it to be optional. Who would buy a digital watch or a cellphone without a backlight?

    -Mark

    1. Re:Warning: no backlight on Zire 21 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get some candles, cheapskate.

    2. Re:Warning: no backlight on Zire 21 by krashish · · Score: 0

      Same thing happened to me. It was supposed to be a replacement for a Palm V - big mistake. I've since went with a Sony Clie SJ33; it's fantastic.

    3. Re:Warning: no backlight on Zire 21 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Pilot 1000 doesn't have a backlight.

      I may have to start using it again. It is retro-cool by now! :)

    4. Re:Warning: no backlight on Zire 21 by sootman · · Score: 1

      I was given a Zire at Seybold. Looks nice but the lack of a backlight kills it. Also, the flimsy rubber cover is a bad joke (flip it out of the way and it springs back into place) and I like the clock (visible through the cover) on my m105. The Zire's USB is nice and it matches my iBook but I'll keep the m105 for now.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  14. Zaurus by NoDoZ · · Score: 1

    I'm still just looking for some apps that'll make my Zaurus as usefull as my old palm pilot was as a PDA. Then it'd be perfect.

    1. Re:Zaurus by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You're right, your Zaurus would be perfect if it was any good at anything.

      Yeah, it runs Linux, you can run Java apps on it...but who cares? It is not a useful PDA. If you want a teeny little computer, then by all means, get a Zaurus.

      Palm has done well thus-far in concentrating on the usability of its core applications. Frankly, I can't see watching a movie on the thing (unless and until there's an optical disk peripheral), and the batteries definitely are not up to the task of multimedia frippery. So, it's a mixed bag: Great PDA, decent toys, lousy battery life. Whereas my Visor and Palm III were great PDA's, no multimedia frippery, and spectacular battery life.

      'Course, I'm going to rush right out and buy a T3 with me first paycheck... : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  15. big question? Who cares?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this remotely insightful? That's like saying, "does the Porsche 911 have on the fly four wheel drive and a place to bolt a goose neck? If not, I'll stick with my F350". Well no duh. Those features are not in these devices target markets.

  16. No. Bad pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tungsten T3 retails at about $400 (US)

    I saw T3 in the theatre for $7.50. $400 is way too much to pay to see a movie.

  17. learn to use a fucking anchor, assmunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:learn to use a fucking anchor, assmunch by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      learn to use a fucking anchor, assmunch
      Like I did here you mean? The reason I don't have an anchor in my sig is because Slashcode turns it in some unreasonably long bunch of html that won't fit.

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    2. Re:learn to use a fucking anchor, assmunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sir Haxalot said:
      The reason I don't have an anchor in my sig is because Slashcode turns it in some unreasonably long bunch of html that won't fit.
      try this
    3. Re:learn to use a fucking anchor, assmunch by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      thanks, much appreciated.

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    4. Re:learn to use a fucking anchor, assmunch by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      A real moment of glory would be if you had been the author of Waste. But instead you get mentioned. Woo.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  18. Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by zymano · · Score: 1

    Tungsten E for $190 could replace the expensive the TI's.

    Maybe the zire too for $100 .

    Are schools locking students into these Texas Instrument calculators when the these pda's can now compete?

    Me thinks so.

    1. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by firewood · · Score: 1
      Although many PalmOS calculator applications look nice, they are just barely catching up in terms of symbolic math capability and educational add-ons.

      But given that a T|T3 benchmarks around 3 double-precision megaflops, PalmOS devices should blow away calculators for some handheld uses.

    2. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by pkhuong · · Score: 2, Informative

      User Interface.

      I can tap on my cheap TI keyboard much faster than i can ever hope to enter data with a pen on a palm. Even using the screen as an input device doesn't cut it: tactile feedback is GOOD.

      Also, i have no idea why HS are pushing graphing calcs: there aren't many college courseswhere you can su programmable calculators.

      And finally, battery life.

      If you want power and usability, you're always going to ahve to dish some money. Heck, nowadays, it's more like, usability == money; power is easy to get. It's not like it's not possible now: there's a package to emulate the hp48 on PPCs and Palms that has been out for a while. Still, it makes you much less efficient. In the calculator world, if you want power and usability, for real world usage, and not only HS, get an HP (while they're still decent), which is what has been used by those who interact with their calculators all the time(engineers, bankers, etc) for many years, not a Palm.

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    3. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1

      I haven't tested it through, but I have a Ipaq and am using a "calculator" on it. Although it looks nice, if I need some bad ass calculations, like 60000 x (e^-7,5), the HP12c (a calculator released 20 years ago) seems to give the right answer, and not some funny numbers. So, I guess the software is still a problem.

    4. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Well, considering you can use one to emulate an HP48G, I'd say their symbolic math capabilities are just ducky.

      What's an educational add-on?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by firewood · · Score: 1

      The HP48 emulator won't run on many of the PalmOS models that are significantly cheaper than a real HP48.

    6. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it fits in my pocket way better, particularly since I carry a PDA anyway.

      I /theenk/ that it'll run on the little monochrome Sony (SJ20?) that can be had for about $100 if you shop around. It's a sweet little piece of hardware.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I decided to be more specific.

      Sony SJ20 is available direct from Sony, but somebody enterprising could prolly turn up a better price. And, according to the Power48 web site, the emu will run on that hardware. Performance? No idea. But, the alternative is there.

      I still don't understand what "educational add-ons" there are. All the HP48 peripherals and software I've ever seen are absurdly expensive. On the other hand, there's lots of free and Free Palm software out there.

      The devices were obviously designed to scratch different itches, but somebody sufficiently flexible-minded can scratch both with one chunk o' plastic.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by uradu · · Score: 1

      > I /theenk/ that it'll run on the little monochrome Sony (SJ20?)

      Sorry, it won't. I have this model, and while a sweet (and very cheap) device, the Power48 author has made the (in my view somewhat silly) decision to insist on a color display. Trying to run it brings up an error dialog:

      16-bit color unavailable
      Power48 requires a color screen with 16-bit color depth to run.

      And that's that. Additionally, I find it quite arbitrary that the ROM images MUST reside on a VFS device. The flimsy excuse given is that they require a lot of space, but even the largest image (49G) is just 1MB, while the actual emulator is about half that. Both could even fit on a 2MB Palm, let alone the 8MB and 16MB models. If the requirement for a color screen and VFS card were removed, it could run on a wide range of devices.

    9. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      That is really unfortunate. I musta missed the color requirement.

      Arbitrary it may be, but it drives my next PDA purchase, that's for sure.

      Thanks for the info, nevertheless!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:Why aren't PDA's replacing pricey calculators ? by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      You might want to take a look at the specs for Easy Calc - I doubt it's everything for everybody, but I can't think of anything he's missed. It's also GPL.

  19. Battery Life?? by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

    What about battery life? As with phones, PDAs, and other portable devices it always worries me that all the latest bells and whistles come with about 2 days battery life (in real terms, not manufacturers quoted figures), in which a pad of paper is better for me, as it won't lose my information or stop working! Anyone got any figures on battery life for recent fancy PDAs?

    1. Re:Battery Life?? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      As with phones, PDAs, and other portable devices it always worries me that all the latest bells and whistles come with about 2 days battery life

      There is a reason why just about every new PDA has a built-in battery. Carry a power cable with you if you're going to not be home at night, and recharge it at least once a day.

      I love having a PDA, but I couldn't concieve of working on it for fourty-eight hours straight.

      (As for lost data--get a memory card. The darn thing's designed to not lose data when it's away from power, so you've got a simple backup right there.)

    2. Re:Battery Life?? by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      I know someone who bought a clie, used it as he normally would (taking notes, looking up addresses etc), and it died within 2 days, losing data since the last hotsync. And I've lost count of the amount of people I know whose nokia's now have only 2 days of battery life (with little call usage) due to the battery degrading over time. I'm not trying to get on my high horse against you here, it just frustrates me that manufacturers put more effort into the shiny attractive features than battery life which is surely one of the most important things in portable electronics. Rant over, apologies...

    3. Re:Battery Life?? by AYeomans · · Score: 1

      Palm claims around 2 weeks in their adverts. My Palm Vx still gets around that battery life in average use. So maybe not too much advertising licence. Better than a new XDA I tested that would not last overnight!

      Means I take a charger on holiday though.
      Personally I'd love them to fit replaceable rechargeable batteries so I could stick in 2 or 3 AAA cells in an emergency on holiday, whilst using the charger most of the time.

      --
      Andrew Yeomans
    4. Re:Battery Life?? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      And in most the built-in batteries suck. Non-replaceable lithium batteries that get a few hours of battery life and die in a couple years, leaving you with an expensive paperweight. Whee.


      Personally, I'd rather have a unit that uses AAA batteries or even a couple AAs. The old monochrome units would get between a couple weeks (Handera 330 with NIMH rechargables, hit by a truck - while in my pocket, ouch) to a month or two (Palm IIIxe with alkaline cells, stolen) in battery life, but you can't get them like that anymore. Battery-draining colour screens and "fast" processors built for OS5 that run all the software that's actually useful (OS3-4) inefficiently. Sheesh. If I wanted a Pocket PC I would've bought one!

    5. Re:Battery Life?? by sebthegourou · · Score: 1


      Well, I bought a zire 71 a few months ago, and the battery life is not that great... I love it's beautiful screen, the camera is great, larger memory than my old pam (an m100) but battery life is an issue.

      With my m100 I could go on trip for 10 days and use my palm frequently, the battery could hold for months.

      With the zire 71, I last 4/5 days. It's just not enought. The increased processor speed is not that usefull, what I need was a nice screen and larger memory, and it comes at a price: battery life is not as good.

    6. Re:Battery Life?? by krets · · Score: 1

      I wish that the companies would realize how important battery life is to many users. I had the first Visor model, 2 megs and I think it was a 16mhz processor, but I would replace the batteries once a quarter at school. When my visor disappearred (stolen, and god knows why, it was 3 years old) I decided to upgrade. It took me months to find something with more features and similar battery life. The Clie SL10 has some cool features and plenty of expandability, though the battery life is only about a month long. Nix the 320 res screens and poo on the 33mhz dragonball processors. I just want more ram and more battery life. I don't want to be staring at my palm device all day. I just want all my important info at my fingertips.

  20. So what is the true speed? by loraksus · · Score: 1, Troll

    I traded out a palm m105 for a toshiba pocket pc - e335 - it is 300mhz, but the palm beat it hands down in most things - opening documents, opening the address book etc.
    The toshiba can barely play mp3s without skipping. I have to ask, why is the performance of most pocket pcs so cruddy?

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:So what is the true speed? by Ikeya · · Score: 1

      I traded out a palm m105 for a toshiba pocket pc - e335 - it is 300mhz, but the palm beat it hands down in most things - opening documents, opening the address book etc.
      The toshiba can barely play mp3s without skipping. I have to ask, why is the performance of most pocket pcs so cruddy?


      I'll give you a hint. Starts with "win" and ends in "dows".

      --
      ---- Move SIG...For great justice!
    2. Re:So what is the true speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'll agree that the performance of a Palm is better than that, I have to disagree that the Toshiba e335 is crappy... I have one. My question to you is, what bitrate are you encoding your mp3s at? What else are you running? I cannot honestly believe that playing mp3s alone will take your Toshiba to its knees. I have a whole crapload of programs running and I can EASILY play ogg audio (encoded at 40 something kbps mono. Speaker sounds only that good. No need to encode any better).

      To answer your question as to why PocketPC performace is cruddy: it is the method by which Microsoft decided to handle applications. Pocket PC never closes applications until you tell it to. If you opened up every app on your PocketPC, then you are going to have all of that processing power and memory that was allocated used up. When that happens it's no wonder your mp3's skip or it takes weeks to load a document. But if you aren't running anything except Windows Media Player, you need to get a replacement.

      Oh, and as a side note: the little "x" in the upper right corner on a PPC doesn't actually close an application. It just minimizes it. Remember that.

      *grumbling* stupid MS foos can't even follow their own HID guidelines. They couldn't follow a standard if it threatened them with their lives the stupid stupid heads. *grumble*

    3. Re:So what is the true speed? by fingon · · Score: 1

      Without trying to offend you, you sound slightly clueless.

      Why would inactive applications use processor resources? (Hint: something called 'scheduler' in most operating systems prevents this. And even WinCE has one, I heard!) Obviously, if you're using 10 MP3 players at same time they might use the CPU, but having Pocket *** in background definitely doesn't.

      Same with memory. Sure, they use memory, but that doesn't slow processing down as the devices lack swap. Unless you run out of it, in which case processing obviously also stops..

      The truth? After playing a bit with the development environment of one, and owning IPaq for awhile, I can tell you that WinCE is monolithic horrid beast which has order of magnitude larger CPU usage / memory footprint than Windows 3.11 for gods' sake, meant for 'embedded' use..

      --
      -- pending
    4. Re:So what is the true speed? by loraksus · · Score: 1

      yeah, that little x doesn't close the program, found that out while begining to program for it.
      WMP does suck incredibly, but I do know a 300k text file will take about 2 minutes to load and quite literally bring the unit to it's knees, though I suppose that is more of a pocket word thing than the unit itself. I'm just amazed how much bloat can be possible.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  21. Is it time to replace my Vx yet? by LaserBeams · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dang, only 6 comments, and the server is down... Must've been running a Palm server. *chuckle* [/obligatory]

    In all seriousness though...

    I'd have to say no. My 3(?) year old Vx still does its job remarkably well, and I don't want a Palm-based Pocket PC do-alike. The Tungsten E is getting closer to what the Vx was in it's time, but it seems they keep skirting handily around the midrange model that I'd like and be able to afford - especially with that battery life! And no expansion capabilities either... a shame as well. I don't want to pay $200 extra for a little SD slot, or likewise...

    Oh well, I can keep waiting. *pats the Vx*

    --
    Karma: \Kar"ma\, n. [Skr.] (Buddhism) One's acts considered as fixing one's lot in the future existence.
    1. Re:Is it time to replace my Vx yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SDIO = expansion capability. (e.g. bluetooth, digicam, blah blah blah)

    2. Re:Is it time to replace my Vx yet? by GarfBond · · Score: 1
      No expandability? What the hell are you talking about?
      "ADD EXPANSION CARDS With built-in expansion slot, your Tungsten E handheld grows as your needs grow. Use stamp-sized expansion cards to back up your handheld or add more memory and applications like games, encyclopedias, dictionaries and more. Or, add peripherals such as a digital camera. (all sold separately)"

      PALM EXPANSION SLOT Supports SD, SDIO and MultiMediaCard expansion cards

      If you mean the lack of the Palm Universal Connector, then yes, it is missing that (it only has a miniUSB port for syncing, much like the original zire).

    3. Re:Is it time to replace my Vx yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. I actually got a Palm Vx from ebay, with: shipping, hard anodized case and folding keyboard, for only 70 bucks. When I got it I headed over to project gutenberg and downloaded some books. Then I downloaded some great software, an app to look at the stars: keyring (encrypted open source app to generate and store passwords), solitaire and a few other interesting apps

      After getting all that installed I now have a very nice palm (with still 4MB of ram free) that I can use to read some great literature[1], take out of my pocket in a cafe and unfold the full size keyboard to type something up, check the location of stars at night, store all my numbers and appointments, etc. Plus the battery lasts about a month

      So I agree with you, nothing so far really makes me want to buy a new palm for now, I'm good for another few years. [1] I hate reading looking at the computer screen. The palm screen however is very comfortable to look at.

  22. T3? What, is the T2 too old alread? by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the T2 just released, literally, a couple months ago?

    Why would they release an update to it now? To cause consumer confusion?

    I don't believe the general public (of which I am a member) thinks of their PDAs as they think of their desktop or laptop computers.

    A PDA is more a consumer electronic device than a computer, and as such should have a much slower product update cycle.

    The T3 is not that different from the T2, definetly not enough to justify a completely new device short months after the original was released.

    Maybe, maybe if it cost less I could some justification. As it is I would have rather seen the T2's price drop.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:T3? What, is the T2 too old alread? by firewood · · Score: 1
      As it is I would have rather seen the T2's price drop.

      The T2 price did drop with the announcement of the T|T3, and it's still a good product in Palm's lineup because it has noticeably bettery battery life than the T3.

    2. Re:T3? What, is the T2 too old alread? by LionMage · · Score: 3, Informative
      While it's true that the Tungsten T2 was released just a few months ago, there is significant difference between the T2 and the T3. I can summarize the differences as follows:
      1. The T2 has a Texas Instruments OMAP processor (ARM derivative with a built-in DSP), while the T3 has an Intel XScale (a StrongARM chip).
      2. The T2 has a dedicated handwriting area. The T3 has a soft handwriting area that doubles as extra screen real-estate.
      3. The T2 has 32 megs of RAM. The T3 has 64 megs of RAM.
      4. The T3 has somewhat streamlined and updated navigation buttons.
      5. The T3 has the ability to display in landscape mode or portrait, due to the extra pixels revealed by the slide-out navigation controls. The T2 only supports portrait display.

      I bought a T2 a couple months back, even though I knew the T3 was going to arrive "soon." (Photos of the T3 had already been leaked, but it was common knowledge that Palm was sitting on the T3 for some reason.) Since I didn't know how soon "soon" meant, I got the T2. I have few regrets. The T2 undoubtedly has better battery life, and I don't have to worry about excess wear on the portion of the display reserved for handwriting, because there are no live pixels in that region.

      So why did Palm release the T2 at all? A few reasons. If you look at the difference between the original Tungsten T and the T2, there are very few. The main differences are: The T2 has a better display, the T2 has double the RAM (32 megs versus 16 megs), and the T2 has a newer PalmOS revision. It's this last part that is perhaps the biggest change, since the newer PalmOS comes with Graffiti 2. As you might recall, Palm lost a lawsuit over the original Graffiti handwriting recognition system, and as part of the remedies, they agreed to migrate to the new Graffiti 2 HWR system across their entire product line. I think the T2 was released precisely to comply with the remedies required of them, and it gave Palm an excuse to slip in a few other revisions to the device. The original Tungsten T was, at the time, the only professional PalmOS device from Palm still using the original Graffiti HWR. Even the Zire series had moved to Graffiti 2.
    3. Re:T3? What, is the T2 too old alread? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I was all set to buy a T2 not too long ago, but doing the requisite research, I discovered that it suffers from "digitizer drift" far worse than any other Palm handheld. Most people attribute this to the sliding case, also noting that the problem can be fixed by banging the Palm(!) in the opposite direction of the drift, as though some mechanism is getting out of whack and this will reset it to it's correct position. While I have dealt with digitizer drift on my Palm IIIxe, it's really annoying. If it's worse on the T2, I don't think I could handle it.

      This particular problem was first discovered on the TT, and it really bugs me that it wasn't rectified on the T2. I won't even consider the T3 unless I hear that Palm's design flaws have been corrected and that the T3 doesn't have the massive drift problems that the rest of that series have.

      Interestingly, the TE may not have such a problem since it does not open/close like the others in the line, however it doesn't have some of the features of them that I'd like either, so it's out.

    4. Re:T3? What, is the T2 too old alread? by krinsh · · Score: 1

      probably offtopic, but I wish I'd known more about Graffiti 1 versus Graffiti 2. I'm not a big fan of Graffiti 2; perhaps because I was so used to the first version and had imprinted upon it so well I still try and use it on my newer device.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    5. Re:T3? What, is the T2 too old alread? by LionMage · · Score: 1

      I suppose it depends on how often you open and close the sliding region on the case. I've noticed a tiny amount of drift, but not enough to be worried about. Recalibration is easy enough, and you're supposed to recalibrate the digitizer on any Palm device at regular intervals.

      I've noticed that Palm has some useful features that eliminate the need to use a stylus or to open the HWR area up, like when you're looking up a contact using only the five-way navigation control. (Up-down to page through the contacts, right to hone in on a specific sequence of characters for a contact entry, press in the middle to select an entry; at that point, you can use up and down to move a single entry at a time up or down in the list, and you can use left to deselect the currently selected entry, which puts you back in "page" mode. It sounds complicated until you use it.)

  23. A lot of nice features, but... by MickLinux · · Score: 3, Funny
    There are a lot of nice features there, and it's a very attractive package and all. But a common criticism that I've heard is that the new T3 sometimes forgets that it can run.



    (Note to moderators: please do not rate this informative. Check the link first. Aargh, why do I actually have to make such qualifying statements first? Do your job, or don't use the mod points. Maybe I'm just too subtle.)

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:A lot of nice features, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent contains a terrifying goatse.cx link. Please do not click. Thank you.

  24. Re:big question? Who cares?!? by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering the Zaurus is competition to these devices, and does offer these utilities, it's relevant.

    Oh, and there are console and SSH apps for Palm OS. They're quite popular for Sysadmin types. Who are a huge target market for these babies.

    And the 911 offers full-time AWD instead of on-the-fly 4WD.

    --
    "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  25. Multimedia? by BWJones · · Score: 1

    So, Palm is touting these as media devices for playing movies. We are considering developing some movies for ophthalmological surgical instruction on Palm devices, but I am wondering with memory limits of 64MB and add on cards only 256MB in size, is anybody really using these things to play anything more than 5-10 second clips? If so, please let me know what you are doing.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Multimedia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that 512MB (and larger) SD cards are available and many people story high quality DivX movies on CD, I think that your observation is a bit skewed.

      Kinoma comes with the new T3 and allows you to convert most movie formats to a Kinoma movie format that stores around 30 minutes of video in around 130 megs of space at full (palm 320x480) resolution.

  26. Nothing with a decent keyboard? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    These palm shaped things are next to useless for any serious work.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Nothing with a decent keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kind of like your dick, eh?

      These palm shaped things are next to useless for any serious work.

    2. Re:Nothing with a decent keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like your dick, eh?
      These palm shaped things are next to useless for any serious work.
      classic.

    3. Re:Nothing with a decent keyboard? by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      These palm shaped things are next to useless for any serious work.
      I think the people making these and every that has bought one already figured that out. You tend to buy PCs for serious work, these are for flexability.

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    4. Re:Nothing with a decent keyboard? by firewood · · Score: 1
      These palm shaped things are next to useless for any serious work.

      Some people do their serious work standing up and moving about. These palm-sized devices fit in a shirt pocket or on a belt-clip.

    5. Re:Nothing with a decent keyboard? by krinsh · · Score: 1

      That's funny; I get a lot of serious work done on mine - writing procedures and planning assignments for my team; scheduling work and personal meetings, using a variety of work-related tools such as IP calculators to check my work; and I keep some reference materials (like IDS signature definitions and the event codes for Cisco devices like firewalls) - right next to a few e-books so I can get some reading done in bed and/or waiting for my wife if I don't have a paper book handy. I am much more organized and keep all of my family's appointments - especially since I do a lot of the domestic work and take my son to the doctor, etc. I have a keyboard that snaps into the device and get a lot of 'wow' value out of my little m130 when I'm taking notes in a meeting or writing a quick poem or blurb for myself or a friend. I think with the right software, a keyboard and learning graffiti, a lot of people could get by without a laptop. How often do you print in a situation like that? I've recommended to one small business that they get PDAs with memory cards and use one computer with multiple accounts for syncing/uploading and printing documents for a very mobile crew they have. I've made a few friends when I pull out my keyboard and say there was a fire sale at SD-6.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    6. Re:Nothing with a decent keyboard? by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      Well done to Palm for not going the Sony route and saddling us with a keyboard.

  27. palm.com slashdotted? by option8 · · Score: 1

    i was going to look for the specs on a zire we got floating around the office, to see if i wanted it, but palm.com was unresponsive.

    checking slashdot to make sure it wasn't just my connection, i see now why i couldn't get to palm.com

    1. Re:palm.com slashdotted? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      No backlight. Fundamentally broken. Moving along...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:palm.com slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not a newton. fundamentally broken. keeping my mp2100...

      ^_^

    3. Re:palm.com slashdotted? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I always loved the Newton, but I didn't have pockets big enough to put it in. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  28. Linux Handhelds Rock! by KermMartian · · Score: 0

    So does this mean I can run Suse or Lindows on my Palm Pilot now? :)

  29. Re:big question? Who cares?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the Zaurus is competition to these devices, and does offer these utilities, it's relevant. Oh, and there are console and SSH apps for Palm OS. They're quite popular for Sysadmin types. Who are a huge target market for these babies.

    Somehow I don't think that Palm (or Sony) is losing a lot of sleep over the fact that the Zaurus has these features "built in". It doesn't change the fact that for the majority of the target audience, those features are irrelevant.

    And the 911 offers full-time AWD instead of on-the-fly 4WD.

    Which is why I said "shift on-the-fly 4WD" specifically, the whole point was that for the audience and application that functionality was not important. I'm not saying that those features are not useful, but that only a small number of individuals are going to make it their make or break decision maker.

  30. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 66 by moojuece · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    lies!!! stephen king is 56...born in 1947

  31. That's a PR by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's not a review, that's a press release.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:That's a PR by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? Looks like some people don't like it when news is required to come from a reporter who evaluates the info themself.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  32. Newton MessagePad, anyone? by bandy · · Score: 1
    • 320x240 screen, rotatable, check
    • voice recorder, check
    • RISC processor, check
    • writing "area" that doesn't get in your way, check
    • Media slots, check

    Now where have I seen this before? And what's that thing I carry around with me everywhere I go?
    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  33. Getting on my soapbox by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    i'm not sure if kids need Palms or not- but the the HELL are we going to have a standardized computer education course in the US?

    SO many people sit in front of computers all day long, but we are not educated about them! Anybody that graduates high school should know what a Megabyte is and how a computer works (to some degree).

    I'm pretty sure most people would have a need to know about the Internet more than they need to know about different forms of Algae.

    Sorry to any Algae lovers out there.

    1. Re:Getting on my soapbox by Onan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even more people use cars, telephones, and clothes every day. Do you also feel that we need standardized education on crankshaft design, that all high school graduates should know the current provided by dialtone from an ESS7, and that all citizens should be familiar with cotton cultivation techniques?

      The fact that these devices are ubiquitous is a cause and result of the fact that one does _not_ need to know arcana like "what a megabyte is" to use them.

    2. Re:Getting on my soapbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure most people would have a need to know about the Internet more than they need to know about different forms of Algae. I agree. It seems quite funny to me that for example algae and (basic) organic chemistry are compulsory high school subjects (I'm not from US, so I don't know about their high schools, though). Most people will never actually need those things; they are just something that are usually considered "good to know about" things. Still no school seems to teach anything about computers (besides the usual Word & Excel lessons) even though that would actually be quite beneficial to most people.

  34. The T3 looks great... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    really a fantastic handheld, pity for the battery life, though, 3 hours doesn't really cut it in a palm (heck, it's lowish even for a laptop!). My lowly IIIc goes weeks without a charge...

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  35. don't make it standard by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Most users won't want one. The fact that my zaurus can run GCC, XFree86, ESD, and the works is what made me buy it.

    Situations come up that can't be predicted, and that's where Linux shines on handhelds. I'm using my zaurus as a network ESD server at the moment, and I'll be using it as an HTTP server in a few minutes. Because my zaurus runs Linux, no one has to rewrite software to do such things. Only a simple recompile is necessary.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  36. Tactile Feedback by MacFury · · Score: 1
    While I agree that a palmOS device can do most if not all of the functions of the TI calculators...one thing they lack is good tactile feedback.

    Inputing numbers with the stylus is painful, and the minature keyboards are just as bad.

  37. How I lust for a new Newton by MacFury · · Score: 1
    Is it conceivable that given todays technology, Apple could cram the features of the messagepad 2100 into the form factor of the palm Zire 71?

    I miss the Newton Interface...it was simply amazing. Why hasn't anyone come close? PalmOS, even v5 is utter crap. It feelsl ike some first year cs students half assed homework assignment.

    1. Re:How I lust for a new Newton by bandy · · Score: 1
      Of course they could, but one of the good things about the Newton was the quality (size) of the display.
      Bigger is better - anyone who tells you otherwise doesn't have much to bring to the party.

      Newt 2x00s are quite cheap now, and can be had on your favorite auction site. I ditched my Palm a year ago in favor of a like-new 2100 and have been a happy MP user since. Lots of web resources, an ATA driver exists so you can use CF in a carrier for storage, ethernet cards are old hat and there's even a 802.11 driver for the WiFi crowd.


      What's not to love?

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    2. Re:How I lust for a new Newton by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Bigger is better
      For screen area, yes. Unfortunately, heavier is *not* better, and the Newt is a hefty device, more so once you add a case, flash and ethernet cards, keyboard, etc.

      It's too bad Apple is so vehemently opposed to getting back into the PDA market. Modern Apple hardware + reworked NewtonOS + Newton handwriting input would make a damn cool PDA. Give it a PPC G3 CPU, 128MB internal RAM, slots for airport and SD/CF cards, bluetooth, and maybe a USB port. Make the display (at least 800x600x16bit color) take up the whole top of the device, give it a titanium flip-open cover (like an MP2100 crossed with a Ti-book) and make the whole thing about the length and width of an MP2100, and thin as possible. *drool*

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  38. I am a Troll by NetNinja · · Score: 0

    I really don't see the need for these cellphone disposible devices.

    They are way overpriced and highly underpowered.
    I guess it all depends on what you use it for.
    My day planer works a whole lot better for most tasks.

    I think it's time for me to get a high priced lawyer and sue the makers of these devices for holding out and stringing us along for the next powerfull device.

  39. Can write code more than 32Kb though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big news as far as I can see is that the 4Kb limit on memos has finally been lifted. According to the PDF handbook for the Tungsten E: "Each memo you create can be up to approximately 32KB in size". That's why I've ordered one - first time I've been tempted to upgrade from my PalmPilot Professional model.

  40. Universal Connector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it about time that Palm stops highlighting that it has a universal connector? Nearly all PDA's have some sort of connector that allows you to put it into a cradle. Any 3rd party device that you can connect to a universal connector you can also get the digital card slot on top.

  41. No built in Wi-fi? by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 0

    I own an oldie clie and I am much happy with it. The one thing I miss is wifi, and I would expect the T|T3 to have a builtin wifi by now. Or a dual slot at the least. How are we supposed to hook up a nice palm like the T|T3 is for browsing /. without a wi-fi card? And if I even buy the overpriced SD wifi cards, I loose the slot so no MP3s, no extra memory. And don't tell me about built in BT, it sucks. I wish the new UX-50 clie was $300 cheaper...

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  42. Handera 330: still the best match by enkidu · · Score: 1

    Read my journal entry where I talk about the exact same thing. I think we only differ on the size of the screen, you want one bigger than I do. Hell, I'd pay twice what I paid for my Handera for one that fits my requirements.

    --

    There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
    -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
    1. Re:Handera 330: still the best match by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Yeah, though the screen on the Handera 330 was just big enough. Unfortunately, the one on mine is now cracked and useless after being hit by a truck (while in my pocket)... interestingly, the bottom 1/3 displayed when it was turned on initially, and the memory card was OK, so I could recover my data, but it doesn't seem to work any more.

      I got the SJ33 after a lot of searching. The battery life was at the high end of the pathetic options available, and I like the case design - most new models don't seem to have anything to protect the screen.

  43. symbolic victory... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Finally Palm has ditched the legacy Motorola 68000 chip for modern variants. That's one less boat anchor they have to worry about in terms of successfully competing with Microsoft's offerings. Eh, maybe I should've looked at their website before I posted that; the original Zire model is still in production and it still is ARM-less. But then who is going to buy the Zire when the Zire21 is only $20 more? 6 more megs and a modern OS.

    Now, with this current lineup, the best thing Palm can do is start adding Bluetooth and WiFi to the lower models within the next product cycle. Maybe even a camera since you can get the Sony Ericsson T616 phone with Bluetooth and a camera for $199 before special rebates kick in. This will keep PocketPC from further entrenching into the low-end, thereby adding confidence in PalmOS as a solid platform in order to drive more higher-end sales (coupled with more enterprise robustness of course)...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  44. Screw tablets by antimuon · · Score: 1

    I want a palm/zaurus interface on the small 40GB drive they use in the ipod. You get to carry around as much information, and it won't make your arm tired. With the vidport like the zaurus has, you could connect it up to a real monitor when you get home, or "sync" it with your desktop.

  45. No, Bluetooth by uradu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's more useful in a portable device like this. While out, you're more likely to have a BT cell phone with you than be in range of some access point. Ideally of course you'd want both, but realistically I'd take the cheaper BT if I could only have one. I just wish they'd start including BT as a standard feature even in the low-end models.

  46. What is battery life like? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about replacing my old Palm V with one of the Tungsten series, as I also wanted bluetooth - what is the battery life like on the T2 or T3? I never seem to see figures mentioned anywhere.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  47. Time for GPRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By now all handhelds should have GPRS. Anything short of this is simply lame. It's really time for these companies put GPRS in every device, not just some.

    Danger hiptop: ssh on your cell phone!

  48. Sweet Sassy Molassy! by iamfireballs · · Score: 0

    You know it is time to upgrade your desktop when it is about to be overtaken by a palmtop! 466 mHz w/ 96mb RAM is my rig alright, i know the numbers are misleading, but NEVER-THE-LESS ahh the life of a starving college student. yeesh

    --
    I like the parts where these old yahooties tolchok each other and then drink their Hebrew vino and getting on to the bed
  49. When will they get it right? by hustille · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aargh! I'm still waiting for a useable phone/organizer combo. I think putting a clunky treo to your ear is absolutely ridiculous, and something as slim as a mobile phone can only have an impossible screen. Now there are organizers with GSM, organizers with bluetooth and bluetooth headsets. Where is the problem with combining them? All those nice innovations, but never in the same package. Ok, I'll stick to my Vx a little longer...

    1. Re:When will they get it right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using the Sony Ericsson P800 (p900 soon availiabe) for this purpose, accordign to my opinion the best compromise between PDA and phone. It's not as good as the Palm or PPC for apps or planning, but it comes damn close, and surfing and emailing is VERY smooth.

  50. Palms are great writing tools by DevilsEngine · · Score: 1

    I wrote six complete novels on Palm machines. The longest of these was over 600 pages when finally carted over to my PC and printed out. Heck, I even did the first one back on the original Palm Pilot where writing meant breaking up each chapter into 4K memos. While I might be able to type faster than I can write, I can write as fast as I can think up decent text, so that wasn't a limit. Any additional effort required was easily offset by the ablity to write while sitting beside a waterfall or standing in line at the movies.

  51. Know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm with you 99%.

  52. too late by bandy · · Score: 1

    It's not Apple that's opposed, it's Jobs. And you must remember that the Newton team is long gone from Apple. Many went to Palm and set their sights much lower.

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  53. Graffiti 1 versus Graffiti 2 by LionMage · · Score: 1
    The major differences between the original Graffiti HWR system and the new Graffiti 2 system are:
    1. Graffiti 2 has more natural looking characters, several of which require 2 strokes instead of one. Graffiti 1 was all about forcing every character to be a single stroke.
    2. To capitalize a character in Graffiti 1, you had to use a special stroke to "shift" to caps mode; to force "caps lock," you made the gesture twice. Graffiti 2 eliminates the capitalization shift stroke, instead interpreting letters drawn on the boundary between the numeric and text entry areas as capitals. I find this easier, personally.
    3. Graffiti 2 introduces a punctuation shift (similar to the capitalization shift stroke in Graffiti 1) to make most accented characters or punctuation marks.
    4. Graffiti 2 can be set up to allow the user to write gestures in areas other than the dedicated HWR region on the screen. At least, I'm 99% sure of this capability (since one of the Tungsten models doesn't have any handwriting area at all, instead sporting a thumb keyboard built into the unit; yet the device still supports Graffiti 2 somehow).

    Graffiti 2 seems closer in many regards to the Newton's block-character recognition, and virtually identical to the HWR built into most PocketPC devices these days. After getting used to Graffiti 2, I prefer it over the original Graffiti. Maybe with time you'll learn to like it too, though it does suck to have to un-learn old muscle memory.
    1. Re:Graffiti 1 versus Graffiti 2 by krinsh · · Score: 1

      yeah and I liked the shift character for some reason it's like typing or something :) thanks for the breakdown, however.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.