Slashdot Mirror


Google Tracking Frequent Users

BrianGa writes "According to this article, Google has started placing a counter on its home page for a small number of its most frequent users. Most Google users do not have it, but a select few now have a counter that notes the actual number of searches made. For the curious, an explanatory page linked to the counter reveals that this is a test, or limited-sample experiment of a new search counting feature."

22 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Google is dead : / by BlueJay465 · · Score: 0, Funny

    I have not been able to get to Google for the last week or so. I have checked all the usual suspects like BHO's and other malware...

    1. Re:Google is dead : / by BlueJay465 · · Score: 1, Funny

      That IP made a HUGE difference. When I try and ping www.google.com, it resolves to 207.44.220.30. Anyone think the DNS name got hijacked?

      Thanks a bunch for that working IP

  2. The Google Counter... by deadgoon42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is this the next Ultimate Status Symbol for nerds??

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
    1. Re:The Google Counter... by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah,of course the first thing I did when reading this story was check to see if I had one.

      Nope. I don't rate.

      Well why the bloody hell not, that's what I want to know. What the hell does a guy have to do to get survielled around here?

      KFG

    2. Re:The Google Counter... by logic-gate · · Score: 5, Funny
      The counter was inspired by airline frequent flier programs, Ms. Mayer said.

      When I can cash in Google searches for free air travel... then I'll be impressed.

    3. Re:The Google Counter... by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, since the karma count isn't displayed in numbers here on /. anymore...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:The Google Counter... by Temporal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nooooooooooo!

      Why did I deny that cookie from Google!? Why!? I do all sorts of searches every day, but due to my damned paranoia Google hasn't been able to keep count!

      I blame timothy for this.

    5. Re:The Google Counter... by Fex303 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Big Brother is ignoring you!!

  3. I my late grandmother were to see this... by dnaboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    'You have searched images.google.com fro Heidi+Klum 4,637 times.'... Hope she's not looking down.

  4. hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    i sure hope they won't combine this with thire marketing, i don't realy want links to penguin porn sites everytime i search for something, since the two things i search for the most is linux and porn ;)

    altho linus in a g-string... hmm

  5. Re:Google as an indicator of consumer demand by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

    I certainly hope they do something like that. I'm an insightful sort of fellow who searches for all sorts of things it turns out aren't available yet.

    I'm looking forward to their taking the hint so I can read Terry Prachett in Latin by the light of my reissue of my favorite Alladin Oil Lamp while sitting in my Rubbermaid(tm) Yurt.

    Oh, I think maybe you meant trendy people.

    That would be different.

    KFG

  6. Re:only if you explicitly allow it to by Inda · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember seeing that too and thinking:

    Google is such a nice company. They feel the need to write big red letters telling me not to click next. I can trust them. There is no need to read the EULA.

    [click]

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  7. Re:only if you explicitly allow it to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    and their EULA is the clearest i've ever seen, from memory, it actually says words to the effect of "stop! don't just click "next"! this is actually worth reading" in large, friendly letters on the cover.

    Am I the only one who imagines these large, friendly letters on the cover to read "DONT PANIC" in future EULA's?

  8. Re:only if you explicitly allow it to by tsa · · Score: 3, Funny

    Indeed. They're mostly harmless.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  9. I wonder when will we read something like this... by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 3, Funny

    WASHINGTON, DC. The presidential candidate announced his resignation from the election run when tabloid press published leaked examples of google searches performed from his own laptop computer. The candidate was seeking among others for "sucks horse cock", "fetish personal ads" and "hentai sailor pictures". The spokesperson of google.com claimed no knowledge on how this information leaked from his company, but announced a thorough investigation. The candidate declined from any comments, but his political carreer seems to be over for good.

  10. Re:google's infinite memory by kfg · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well I hope they do a better job than Amazon.

    I haven't a freakin' clue why they think I might be interested in Bette Midler Sings the Rosemary Clooney Songbook.

    Buy Terry Gilliam's Brasil. . .get recommended Barbie's Swan Lake.

    And what makes them think I use underwear anyway?

    KFG

  11. Worst nerd fear ... by BESTouff · · Score: 4, Funny
    Next thing, you know, they will replace this counter with a category, and you'll see .sig like this:

    Google Karma: Terrific, due to obsessive searching syndrome

  12. Re:Thin end of the wedge... by FreeMars · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe it's time for a week-long boycott just to show them we *can* get by without them - plus an email campaign to drive the point home.

    Maybe they'll shut down for a week to show us we can't get by without them.

    --
    Email: slashdot3@FreeMars.org (Address will be abandoned when it gets spam.)
  13. Re:google's infinite memory by illuvata · · Score: 2, Funny

    why to i think this would look like

    "Other people who searched for a, also searched for b, sex and porn."

  14. It seems a bit ironic by eXtro · · Score: 4, Funny
    that NY times implies that the sky is falling by defining cookies as
    a software file that a Web site places without the recipient's permission or notification and that transmits information back to the site.

    and then sets several cookies on my computer. I don't actually care, but it shows how little technical proficiency the fact checkers have. Before making a statement like that I'd make sure that my own web site didn't also set cookies.
  15. Re:Thin end of the wedge... by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suppose we could always go back to reading tealeaves. Or chicken entrails, if it comes to that.

    Or just picking fleas out of each other's fur; that used to be fun.

  16. What counter? I use WGET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I also occasionally surf using telnet to port 80, but I find surfing with WGET to be the most soul-satisfying experience.

    Thomas Dz.