Slashdot Mirror


Upcoming SuSE 9.0 Professional Reviewed

molarmass192 writes "Open magazine has the first review I've seen of the upcoming SuSE 9.0 (or should that be SUSE 9.0 now?) Professional distribution. To summarize, they are impressed with the upgrades to Yast (it's fully integrated into the KDE control panel), Samba integration, Winmodem support, network configuration management, and performance. It's not the most thorough review I've ever read, but it's an interesting look at what to expect for those who have preordered SuSE 9.0."

8 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. SuSE is awesome...mostly. by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless they've changed something, they have a habit of having everything including the kitchen sink included.

    I guess that's good. Most everything is behind a version or two by the time it hits your hands though (in the past).

    Perhaps I'm simply spoiled by the FreeBSD ports collection (any good package manager really) where I run cvsup to get the ports collection current, then I can either build from source or pkg_add -r pkgname and install the binary quickly across a network.

    Don't take this a knock though, SuSE was the *nix that I learned on, and it's still awesome. Just seems somewhat unwieldy to bundle so much software in that is going to go out of date so quickly.

    Great for situations without net access though.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  2. It's great! by pumpknhd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People may ask why we should shell out money to pay for open source programs...well, open source doesn't mean free source. Someone had to put in their time and energy programming this stuff. And since most of us haven't contributed to the source code, we could at least support those who have. :)

    1. Re:It's great! by big+tex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bzzzzt. Try again.

      As a SuSE user who has been buying boxed sets since 6.1, I know that I am helping to support KDE, ReiserFS, and so on. SuSE supports full-time KDE developers, so I _am_ paying the programmers.
      Plus, I really like YaST, so I pay for it.

      Also,it's more than "some handbook". It's a frickin' set of doorstops compared to any other reference manuals that I've seen come in a boxed set.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. What kind of performance increase? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use to use SuSE in the past. It has become quite slow and bloated, even on my athlonXP.

    I switched to Freebsd because its slim and lightening fast. I have a hunch its mainly its own version of xinet and yast that slows things. I wonder if it could be faster and if it is, if I should switch?

  5. Re:The one feature I want by locus_standi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you tried Mandrake 9.2. It features wireless network configuration and automatic detection during installation. Redhat 9.0 also has WiFi features.

  6. Re:Still waiting for Distro "X" by PReDiToR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Working on the assumption that you didn't put this in just to troll ...

    Has the command line stripped out with EVERYTHING, I MEAN EVERYTHING possible for the GUI, NO EXCEPTIONS, not even for Emacs zealots)

    There you go, spoiling it. You described the perfect OS until you said that.

    The command line is NECESSARY you dolt. Necessary, as in, can't live without. As in no matter how pretty you make your OS it still runs on text, and you have to get to that text sometimes. If you want nothing but pictures, grab the funnypages. In this world the command line lets you fix problems that arise in ways that they never teach you in college. Its the command line that keeps people like me in employment while kids straight out of university are still scratching their heads over how to write shell scripts.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  7. Buy one, install many! by Frodo420024 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just found this:

    Furthermore, no license costs are incurred for the installation on multiple machines or for software subject to the GPL (General Public License).

    on their 10 reasons to switch page. Cool.

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.