Slashdot Mirror


Danish Study Recommends Open Standards for EU

PDAJames writes "The Danish government has wrapped up a two-year study of open source's potential for the public sector, and has some pretty interesting things to say. For one, it says that tie-ins to proprietary software effectively eliminate competition for government procurement and are inherently bad. For another, it recommends a public sector-led effort to adopt an XML-based standard document format, either that of OpenOffice or a new one developed by the EU. Will they push ahead with these plans or is it just more talk?"

185 comments

  1. Speaking of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    XML-based standard document format, either that of OpenOffice

    There is another vendor providing XML-based document formats currently.

    1. Re:Speaking of by penguinrenegade · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually they are using a warped XML - not TRUE XML. Just like they did with Palladium - took over someone else's format and warped it.

    2. Re:Speaking of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain? "Warped" Vs. "True" XML? I didn't know either existed.

    3. Re:Speaking of by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually only the metadata (author and title of document) is formated in XML, all the rest is just in a new proprietary binary-format contained in XML.

    4. Re:Speaking of by Elektroschock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This probably refers to the German (Schleswig - Holstein) based initiative 1dok e.V. They want to establish a standard file format for word processing based on XML.

    5. Re:Speaking of by kfg · · Score: 1

      I can show you mine.

      Can you show me yours? :)

      KFG

    6. Re:Speaking of by praedor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Using an XML foundation doesn't assure openness of the file to other "interpreters", ie, other word processors. M$ may use XML as a basis for the layout of their docs, but they still fill it to the rim with closed, propriatory slop in an attempt to make it only renderable in Word. No good.


      The desire for open + XML means that a document in this format would be fully transportable between wordprocessors. This is a good thing (tm), particularly in government. Anything else effectively gives ownership of all government documents to the company that supplied the closed, propriatory format. When that company goes under (ALL companies will die out at some point) it's file format dies with it.


      Government documents belong to the PEOPLE for eternity, not to private companies. They must be accessible without artificial restriction (via propriatory, closed file format) no matter what happens to some vendor supplying the parent wordprocessor.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    7. Re:Speaking of by spektr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Explain? "Warped" Vs. "True" XML? I didn't know either existed.

      <!xml variation="1.000001" encoding="crazy">
      <!redfine pattern="<" substitute="[">
      [!redfine pattern=">" substitute="]">
      [!redfine pattern="/" substitute="\"]
      [worddoc]
      [paragraph style="malicious"]
      Executive summary: this is XML!
      Whoops world, here I come! Take this Xerces! Watch out W3C!
      [\paragraph]
      [alternativeBinary thisistherealdocumentignoretherest="yes"]
      magic:666
      4($/HKDh3627KJHK/%$"%&&&%Ijhdifzsdfusdfuhd f
      KDh3627KJHK/%$"%&&&%Ijhdifzsdfu"%"%$&737%& % ...
      843578kjfh/&%"/&"%&%$/jghfdjd7&%&"%/"JHGD3
      [\alternativeBinary]
      [\worddoc]


      This is just imagination. The reality is stranger than we imagine, in fact stranger than we can imagine.

    8. Re:Speaking of by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Difference is, the OOo flavour of office document XML is going through Oasis standards (from memory.... if not, then another standards organisation!) and I believe KOffice is going to support the same standard.

      MS were invited, but said they didn't want to play... not suprising really given the cash-cow status of MS Office, but it does clearly conflict with the objectives of open government.

    9. Re:Speaking of by Idolatre · · Score: 1

      The truth is that you can represent anything using XML, it is a very simple standard and allows you to define any document structure you like, as long as you follow some basic rules to allow it to be parsed by XML parsers. Having XML as a data format does not make it any easier to open a XML document with a MS Word schema in an application that only knows the OpenOffice schema, it only allows it to parse it an consistant way, but once it's parsed, the application still has to interpret it, it's not interpreted by magic.

      What MS did was to make it's own DTD/Schema to represent office documents in perfectly legal XML.

  2. OpenOffice vs. other office products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't the KDE developer stop working on KOffice and support OpenOffice instead?

    We need more people working on OpenOffice. OpenOffice is the only product that has a chance against MS Office.

    1. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree as long as OpenOffice stays FREE!!!

      i said FREE as in free beer and freedom...

    2. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by Carewolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't the KDE developer stop working on KOffice support OpenOffice instead?

      He is busy convincing the GNOME developer to just give up and support KDE.

    3. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by Elektroschock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Both KOffice and Abiword will adopt the OO.org file format! OO may be a technology trap. Concumers want choice. Programmers also want choice. This is not totalitarism, everybody is free to do what he wants. 1 + 1 2!! Your philosophy is the philosophy of state economy (one factory has the best economies of scale) or the big old industries. A market economy enforces competition.

    4. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by Cyclops · · Score: 1

      AbiWord supports the OO.o format, but it is not it's native format, neither it is going to be in the short run, for sure.

    5. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    6. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice and KOffice have very different approach to word processing. KWord uses textflow oriented editing and is in that respect much more like FrameMaker than MS-Word or OpenOffice that both uses a document centric approach.

      However it would be nice if we could import OpenOffice documents as textflows into KOffice.
      The other way round is harder, but I suppose one could always export each KOffice textflow as an OpenOffice document.

      I suspect that this kind of expart/import functionality will emerge quite soon as both programs use XML based file formats. A little XSL should do the trick.

      All in all, I think there is room for both KOffice and OpenOffice.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
    7. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      as long as there are strict regulations that are enforced vigorously, otherwise, your market economy is no better than classic capitalism.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by snarkh · · Score: 1
      A market economy enforces competition.

      Market economy?! I thought those programs were supposed to be free.

    9. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by flossie · · Score: 1
      Market economy?! I thought those programs were supposed to be free.

      That's right, it's a free market economy!

    10. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a collection of sound bytes ...

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    11. Re:OpenOffice vs. other office products by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      The way I see this is that, while several open source projects working on a similar concept but different products might result in a slower development time for an overall MS Office killer, the resulting products will have played off each others strengths and weaknesses to become better works.

      Phew. Maybe an analogy would work better...
      Ok, if you've ever been in a large band practice complex, you'll have seen the different bands rub shoulders in the hall, listen to each other's music, sit in on sessions with each other, haul gear... and some of the bands do decide that joining efforts would be a good idea. Those that don't cannot help but be influenced by the ideas around them, however, and this can sometimes lead to a "sound" emerging from an area(ahh, seattle).

      I think this is really the effect that would benefit you in the long run. Not a single product like OpenOffice, but a selection of products that all relate to each other. A similar UI, making switching between apps easy for the user(see Apple). A common method of storing data. Maybe a shared patch alert/distribution system. Anyhow, a different perspective for you.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  3. Stop press.. by adeyadey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe, in the light of the release of Windows RG edition they should rethink their position on proprietry software..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Stop press.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      talk about emulating the right winie feeling... Toss out vmware.

    2. Re:Stop press.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      The "look and feel" is spot on, isnt it?

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  4. Theres the Killer by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Open standards are the best thing imaginable for the customer. The data that software manages is consistently orders of magnitude more valuable than the hardware/software that does the managing.

    This wont open up things entirely, there are still patented feature sets, and purely proprietary technologies. It will at least let the best product win, not the company that got their first.

    1. Re:Theres the Killer by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      The company who gets there first rarely wins. It is the first company who gets there with a good marketing department that usually wins.

      Other that that I completely agree with you.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
  5. Inherently bad? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    it says that tie-ins to proprietary software effectively eliminate competition for government procurement and are inherently bad.

    Well, I might say that if one were considering government procurement only, they might be inherently bad. But there absolutely *is* good software out there that is proprietary that is good, and better than anything available open source. This is not to say I am not in favor of open source. Quite the contrary, I believe in an open source foundation, but companies should be allowed to bid on contracts for their proprietary products as long as those products are either based on open source, or support open source formats and alternatives.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Inherently bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This proposal isn't against closed software, it's against close FORMATS.

      Any commercial product which will support open formats will be also considered as viable alternative.

    2. Re:Inherently bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The two statements are not necessarly exclusive. Tie-ins to proprietary software are indeed inherently bad, because they limit the user's ability to change to different software later. If the difference in quality between the proprietary software and any competing software is great enough, it can be enough of an advantage to overcome the disadvantage of being tied to proprietary software.

      However, if I were a large organization requesting bids for software that included proprietary data formats, I would require that the ability to export data into an open format be included.

    3. Re:Inherently bad? by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I would require that the ability to export data
      >into an open format be included.

      It is not enough.

      It should save data to an open format by DEFAULT.

      And if you choose an alternative format, it should not pop up an annoying dialog every time.

    4. Re:Inherently bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about proprietary software vs. open-source software. This is about file formats that can be read by anybody vs. file formats that have to be reverse-engineered if they can be read at all.

      In twenty years time, do you think there will be any computer able to read Microsoft Word's files? So what happens when a government needs to access some old archived documents? Or are you expecting them to hire somebody every time a new version of Word comes out to go through their whole archives to update everything to the new format?

    5. Re:Inherently bad? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      I Fully agree with that.

      I work in a financial institution and I've been using Excel, in its different version, since Excel 3. I find extremely disturbing that the program tries to force inexperienced users to change document formats with messages like: "you're trying to save this document in a previous version, some formatting might be lost: continue anyway?". Note that this happens even if you simply type "hello" in a cell.

      I think that any program used for public procurement, or any document submitted for public uses, should absolutely be provided in an open format, to the exclusion of any proprietary formats.

      The problem for Excel users like me is in macro languages: do you think that a standard should be used for that as well? I am a middle of the road user, and I do not want to learn VBA. give me back the excel 4 macro language!!!!!!

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    6. Re:Inherently bad? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Actually its against both - because open software, and open formats encourage competition - as opposed to monopolies.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  6. Well, at least some part of government has brains. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's hard to imagine something smart to come from a country that sent a corvette, snow plows and other winter equipment and a submarine (that broke down before its first mission) to help in the war against Saddam.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  7. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hah! You revealed that you knew that the Danish government is located in "Denmark", a word not provided by the article. So you are probably stupid but most likely not American.

  8. Pure and beautiful XML document format won't exist by Leeji · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been thinking about the XML document format problem, and I don't think there will ever be a "pure and beautiful implementation" that will ever be perfect.

    As the capabilities of the document format grow, people gain the ability to embed images, arbitrary objects, graphs, etc. Much of this can be written in a self-describing style (ie: plain text XML nodes,) but there comes a point where the developers have to simply hack XML and embed some nasty CDATA kludge.

    Just looking at the embedded image problem alone -- static SVG is a great, pure-XML image format. Unfortunately, it will never have the power to describe the full set of images that you could create in a binary format.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  9. That XML buzzword again by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    For another, it recommends a public sector-led effort to adopt an XML-based standard document format, either that of OpenOffice or a new one developed by the EU. Will they push ahead with these plans or is it just more talk?

    What's wrong with good old reliable existing formats?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:That XML buzzword again by spoonist · · Score: 1

      The cool thing about XML-based implementations like DocBook is that I can generate all the formats you mentioned (ASCII, PS, HTML, TeX) plus a few more from just one single document in XML.

    2. Re:That XML buzzword again by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ah, well, if you're talking plain text ASCII is obviously the way to go. Only a limited number of documents are actually just plain text though. If you wish to display online HTML is obviously the way to go. If you wish to print TeX is obviously the way to go.

      So you end up with three source documents just to publish, "Hello World."

      Whereas with OO XML you can do everything these three seperate quarter page documents do with only eight frikkin' pages of XML code. (Go ahead, try it. Open OO Writer, type "Hello World," and save as raw XML)

      And that's why it's better.

      KFG

    3. Re:That XML buzzword again by crucini · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, the RFC's are written in plain text (or nroff translated to plain text) and communicate some pretty substantial ideas. They use ascii art where necessary. The more I see of the ever-changing world of rich documents, the more I think everything should be plain ascii. It has more chance of being readable 50 years from now.

    4. Re:That XML buzzword again by pacc · · Score: 1

      Adopting OO XML will give you access to every solution that has been need while developing OpenOffice.

      Developing an inhouse XML format would make solutions solutions for data-mining and cross-linking more feasible while still being able to easily translate to whatever office suite is in fashion at the time.

      I'm not saying that it's easy or working right now, but EU ought to use its momentum and recognize XML for what it's good at and not choose it as one among other fileformats.

    5. Re:That XML buzzword again by kfg · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to see Tenniel's or Thurber's drawings rendered as ASCII when reading books. Even ebooks. I'd like to be able to see them properly displayed.

      That said, pretty much all the work my business does is done in plain ASCII. Data mining is done with a bit of applied human intelligence and grep.

      It works.

      KFG

  10. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in Danishland. See? not all of us Americans are stupid ...

  11. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post a link if you have one, this is a riot

  12. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you cut that out? How many times have you done this now?

  13. The Danish come from Danland by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    A small island situated somewhere around Europe or somewhere like that.

    See the CIA World Factbook Entry for more info.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:The Danish come from Danland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Danland *LOL* you know it is a holiday-resort in Denmark, right? :p

    2. Re:The Danish come from Danland by BigBadDude · · Score: 1


      Denmark is not an island, are you American too??

    3. Re:The Danish come from Danland by dduck · · Score: 1
      I dunno... We export beer, supermodels and pop music - some of it even made by Superheroes, and the quazi-legal status of cannabis - at least in Christiania - seems to be pretty popular among foreign tourists.

      It is cold here in the winter, but then we take revenge in the summer by basking half-nude and usually slightly sloshed in the many public parks. Yes, we are allowed to carry, and even drink, alcohol in public here. Ah, the joys of socialism ;)

    4. Re:The Danish come from Danland by geekster · · Score: 1

      No no, Legoland is where all Danes go to take their drivers license...

    5. Re:The Danish come from Danland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark Allways check wikipedia before you open your mouth on slashdot :) Sometimes it is better to shut up and let everyone think you are stupid, than to open your mouth and accualy prove it.

  14. XML transfer does not solve layout problems by more · · Score: 1

    The format is not the problem; it is the layout algorithm. It is no longer sufficient to be able to transfer the data, but the it needs to look the same on different systems. The layout algorithms need to be standardized to a bit-perfect level in order to have true compatibility between two word processing systems. Another (perhaps less intelligent possibility) is to add layout information to the file when it is saved, and this layout info is manipulated when and if the document is manipulated in different systems, removing the need to standardize layout algorithms.

    --

    -- Imperial units must die --

  15. Why not. just ... by madpierre · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    make graduation from law school a capital crime.

    Punishable by death. No appeal.

    All this litigation is gonna drag humanity back to
    the bloody stone age.

    --
    siggy played guitar
  16. nooooo! by willll · · Score: 1, Insightful

    either that of OpenOffice or a new one developed by the EU
    Just what we need: another XML document format. As if we didn't already have enough.

  17. my government by broeman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must say that I am a bit confused. Not long time ago our "beloved" government (I even voted for them) were in favor of software patents and the use of industry standard software (read Microsoft) ... Open Source has been discussed in the Danish parlament for some years, even before the current government (2 years old in a month). The former government promised to change all state-institutions to OSS, but still nothing has happened. SSLUG (Skane Sjaelland Linux User Group, biggest LUG in Denmark) have had some discussions on this topic without much succes ... but saying this, I am looking forward to a initiative from our very quiet IT-minister. The report is from the Board of Technology, that have many good and forgotten discussions.

    --

    (yes this can be compared with sex)
    1. Re:my government by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      The lawyers dictate the law.

      You'd better talk to your department of Justice now or ask the ministers of economy to put pressure on the justice ministers. Also for parliamentary initiatives is now the right time.

      The council of ministers will decide on nov 10th. They are not bound by the EU parliament's decision as national governments are only accountable to the parliament. And the uk is likely to push for a horribel proposal. Note: now the government groups themselves decide about this issue.

      Take a look at FFII UK's call for action and adapt it like the German Gnus did.
      Or write your own call for action.

      You can track the latest news on this issue via AEL wiki. And there are national European FFII mailing lists, for instance for denmark dk-parl@ffii.org (Mailman Interface)

    2. Re:my government by broeman · · Score: 1

      If you speak Danish, instead of the mailling-list (3 people subscribed), take a look at this site.

      I don't know how other countries deal with software-patents, but in Denmark we discuss every detail in the parlament (it is very unlikely that you can gain anything through lawyers). Just a fast browse on the page, and I found that even discussions about Konquorer and Mozilla Browsers have found their way into a Board-meeting. The answer is pretty bad, since the Economy&Residence-minister (who are the responsible in this case) is educated Policeman, and have not much knowledge about these issues. This is the general problem with the government (and I don't mean the administration, only the ministers), and this makes it easier to influence them.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    3. Re:my government by ebbe11 · · Score: 1
      but saying this, I am looking forward to a initiative from our very quiet IT-minister

      Don't hold your breath while waiting. It will take a while before the IT-minister grasps what this is all about. Not that his predecessor was much better...

      And I have a sinking feeling that this problem is not confined to Denmark...

      --

      My opinion? See above.
  18. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by BigBadDude · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    It's hard to imagine something smart to come from a fascist country that sent a corvette, snow plows and other winter equipment and a submarine and then killed unarmed innocent Iraki fishermen.

  19. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by Persol · · Score: 1

    Snow plow in iraq.... maybe they know something we don't. It should be noted that the corvette in question was not a car:)
    Links:
    http://www.denmarkemb.org/news/news_03_28_03.html

    And the snow plow:
    http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,67 29744%5E13762,00.html

  20. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not even worth the heat

  21. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in Danishland. See? not all of us Americans are stupid ...

    Polite applause. The answer is significantly better than Deutschland, Disneyland or Erdbeerland.

  22. Re:Pure and beautiful XML document format won't ex by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    The problem is all these people coming up with new XML document formats. They should just use plain XML.

    ;)

  23. Largest product development center MS has by threaded · · Score: 1

    The largest product development center Micrsoft has outside the United States is in Vedbaek, Denmark.

    Should be interesting following this story...

    1. Re:Largest product development center MS has by dogen · · Score: 0

      Bigger than Microsoft.India?

    2. Re:Largest product development center MS has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they bought Navision not long time ago (1-2 years?) Appearently they want to be number one on the business-software market too.

    3. Re:Largest product development center MS has by threaded · · Score: 1

      According to Microsoft, yes.

  24. Bundles are the answer!! NeXT had this years ago.. by avarame · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Better yet than XML... bundles!!!

    Go research .rtfd files on NeXT and Mac OS X. They're basically super-RTF files. They are actually a folder ending with .rtfd that the operating system presents to the user as a single file (for mere aesthetic and encapsulation reasons). They contain an RTF file and all the non-RTF resources (images, sounds, etc) that are embedded in the document as separate files in their own formats. I believe images are saved as TIFF by default.

    So why not combine open XML document formats and rtfd-style bundles! A complex document is really a folder full of files, but it appears to the user as a single file. This makes it easy to move around, esp from computer to computer, and presents a nice sensible metaphor to the user. It's also difficult to screw things up by messing with the components (but it is possible to get into the bundle if you need to). Inside these complex documents is an XML file that describes the components of the document. Then there are files that contain the components, in whatever (open) format you wish. RTF or OpenOffice or whatever for text, Ogg sounds, PNG or SVG images, CSV or more complex spreadsheet/table formats, all the fonts the document needs, etc.

    One of the replies to the parent addressed the issue of pixel-exact rendering. That's easy - just use the same rendering engine everywhere! All Gecko browsers render exactly the same everywhere (assuming the same fonts are available). So just use a single homogenous rendering engine everywhere. (And include fonts in the document bundle).

    I sure hope some brilliant application-software engineer reads this! :)

    (Final note: Another, more risky option would be to provide an API for rendering modules written in some suitable language, which would then be included in the bundle. You want to render, say, Maya IFF images? Include the IFF renderer in the bundle. Of course great security precautions would need to be taken, and optimally the rendering modules would have access to nothing outside the document-world, and preferably only a buffer to draw into and layout above them would be managed by the program. This has been tried before, I think. But maybe its time has come?)

    --
    Save time now so you can waste it later
  25. Re:Where? by broeman · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Kingdom of Denmark is actually located both in Europe and North America (we gave up on Wineland aka New Foundland). It includes Denmark, The Faroe Islands and Greenland. The country and state Denmark is the "little hat" you see on top of Germany. And happy to tell this, we are still feared in east-England because of our past (even the CIA calls us raiders! :)

    --

    (yes this can be compared with sex)
  26. What about Office 2003? But... by thirty2bit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Microsoft Office 2003 saves documents in XML. It's not quite an open standard, but then again, it's not totally proprietary.

    Then it was just in the media that Steve Ballmer spoke out vehemently against Open Source. (again)

    I'd like to know how the Danish study would factor those two together? In other words, would they consider the overall 'philosophy' of the manufacturer of a certain piece of software when choosing that manufacturer's software?

    1. Re:What about Office 2003? But... by dspeyer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Samples of MS-XML have been posted here on /., and they are pretty opaque. They don't seem to be using base64 tricks, but they're doing everything else.

      Just because XML is open doesn't mean everything built on it is open. TCP/IP is open, but there's plenty of proprietary applications and data flowing over it.

    2. Re:What about Office 2003? But... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, in the MS XML format, the only place the string 'Hello world' actually shows up is in the title block. So human readable it ain't.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:What about Office 2003? But... by TheViciousOverWind · · Score: 1

      Apparently you just did a quicksearch, the words "Hello World" is actually in the content itself, slashdot just threw a space in there, so it's "Hel lo World".

      --
      My <1000 UID is with a hot chick
  27. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Snow plow in iraq.... maybe they know something we don't. "

    Yes, maybe they indeed do. Hint: go to www.google.com , type words "iraq", "climate", "winter" and "snow" in the box and press "I feel lucky". :O

  28. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It wasn't a snowplow it was a groundleveler, don't listen to stupid journalists.

  29. Re:Bundles are the answer!! NeXT had this years ag by Xerithane · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking of posting something along these lines. XML shouldn't be used for storing binary data, because we already have file formats for this. You could also use an open compression form so that you actually have one single file (or just use tar, whichever, since compressing images doesn't do jack shit) which is easier to send out.

    The main issue with using the same rendering engine is that screens are never the same. Colors are different, even font packages are different amongst Windows, Mac, and Linux. What about multi-lingual support, with right to left text support, etc? It gets pretty tricky working around all that stuff.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  30. sweet!!! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 4, Insightful

    nice...if the EU uses a public open format, their economic power will force MS to have filters for the format!!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  31. Oh man! by zonix · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I'm Danish - no wonder I haven't heard about the snow plow. :-)

    Anyway this part of our military is a support unit (ie. not our special forces) and for that matte their usual role is peace keeping. A role much more needed in Iraq about now - a pitty they're only a couple of hundred as I fear they won't make a difference like in Bosnia, Macedonia, the former Yugoslavia, etc.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  32. Re:Pure and beautiful XML document format won't ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh, but I don't need to outrun the tiger... I just need to outrun you... ;-P"

    It needs not to be perfect, it must only be as "good" as MS' .doc format.

    Have a nice day!

  33. Re:Where? by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 2, Funny
    Oh please! You don't need to insult us fellow Americans. Look it up.

    From Webster's
    Danish: a light pastry leavened with yeast and often filled with cheese, fruit, etc ...

    So, it's obviously in a bakery! Get a clue!
    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

  34. Re:Bundles are the answer!! NeXT had this years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why not combine open XML document formats and rtfd-style bundles!

    You mean like the native openoffice formats, which are essentially zip archives?

    That's when you know the concept of bundles has been implemented well, when people don't even realise they're using bundles.

  35. Re:Bundles are the answer!! NeXT had this years ag by dspeyer · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is exactly what xml word processors do.

    OpenOffice uses zip to combine several xml files (one for content, others for meta-info and editor advice) and any image files or similar embedded content in their native formats. IIRC, KOffice uses tar.bzip2 and Abiword uses tar.gz, but I don't have those in front of me at the moment.

  36. Re:Danish by kasperd · · Score: 1

    Ain't that something you eat?

    Det kan du bande paa, det ikke er!

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  37. Mod parent up by benja · · Score: 1

    That's exactly the point. While proprietary software may be better that free software in some cases, tying yourself to proprietary software is not wise.

  38. Re:Where? by monsterzero2003 · · Score: 1

    First see the New York times: "Elsinore Journal; Something Cheap in the State of Denmark: Liquor"

    Second: FREE GREENLAND! Stop Danish imperialism! Support Greenland workers who labor under sweatshop conditions making sealskin garments for rich New Yorkers! Stop the baby seal clubbers! Denmark out!

  39. Re:Pure and beautiful XML document format won't ex by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about the XML document format problem, and I don't think there will ever be a "pure and beautiful implementation" that will ever be perfect.

    Perhaps you want to share your thoughts by joining the OASIS Openoffice XML file format standardization effort

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  40. Re:Where? by hazem · · Score: 1

    Oh come-on! EVERYONE knows that the Danish government is in Daneland, just like the Scotish government is in Scotland and the Irish government is in Ireland. If there was this place "Denmark", clearly, the government would Denmarky or Denmarkan.

    Silly Europeans! Too bad you don't have an education system like us Americans!

  41. Re:Where? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    It is a dark and fearsome land, beyond the scary edge of the world. So, Americans can't go there - you'll fall off...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  42. Well, go for competition and drive M$... by praedor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To add a filter for the very open OO format. Nothing stops M$ from adding support for OO's file format, it is right there for the copying. This excerpt from the report:


    However, the report recognised that establishing a existing alternative or a new format would be an uphill battle, given that Microsoft Office cannot read OpenOffice documents or other formats.


    is real simple to correct. Start using OO format (via OO/SO) in government and M$ would be compelled by competition forces to support OO format...of be locked out of government. An OSS developer could also whip up an OO document "viewer" of small size so people could easily download this "plugin" and view OO government docs on their M$ systems (for those unwilling due to bandwidth constraints or obtuseness to simply install OO/SO).

    It is wrong to essentially require people to spend lots of money for a specific, propriatory wordprocessor just so they can view government documents. It is another thing entirely for them to "have to" download and install a free-of-charge office suite to do the same (though a plugin would alleviate most unreasonable heartburn). Even if they didn't do either, the contents of the document are still fully available to them in a cluttered form if they simply unzip the OO document and look at the ascii contents. Can't do that with word docs.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Well, go for competition and drive M$... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Why does this kind of thing not already exist. I am not a coder (in-house web only), but it would seem straight forward to build one. I just searched for one yeasterday, and found some questions, but no answers.

  43. Open Standards != Open Source by pfafrich · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think we need to make a clear distinction between Open Standard and Open Source. They are very different beast and should not always be confused. The Report seemed to be more enthuisatic about the standards than the source.

    Open Standards are all about interoperability creating a level playing field where companies can compeat to produce the best readers and writers of the standards. Consumers and Govs are free to choose which suits them best. This is one of the reasons the web took off as html was essentially an open standard, even though there were no open source browsers about in the early days.

    Open Source is a different beast. I don't think the the benifits for a company to open source its products are as clear. Yes there are advantages with transpanancy for govemental use. Yes its great for hobbyiest, probably great for products aimed at developers. But the economic model is dificult, the viral licencing can cause problems.

    In general I'm much more passionatle about Open Standard than Open Source.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    1. Re:Open Standards != Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the reasons the web took off as html was essentially an open standard, even though there were no open source browsers about in the early days.

      How early are you talking about? When I started browsing Mosaic was already available so I guess it's POSSIBLE that before that browsing was dominated by closed source products but I'm sceptical. Certainly it was widespread graphical browsing, starting with open sourced Mosaic, that sparked the web 'taking off' in its current form.

      I think you're re-writing history to conform to your prejudices.

    2. Re:Open Standards != Open Source by flacco · · Score: 1
      In general I'm much more passionatle about Open Standard than Open Source.

      I think open standards are a prerequisite for open source. and open source results in open standards, since there is far less mystery about what the code is doing with the data it receives.

      open standards and open source are mutually reinforcing.

      while open standards are important, to focus on them to the exclusion of open source isn't a good idea. getting stuck with a piece of proprietary software within a set of protocol boundaries is still a possibility if there is any single critical aspect of the system that is non-open.

      examples abound in the microsoft world. a piece of ms software may "support" a "standard", but then you find it uses that standard in a non-compatible way, or that another critical aspect of the software is non-standard, or will only work as written with other microsoft software.

      it's also important for organizations to not only use products that support open protocols, but to actually use the open protocols and avoid features of the package that are not open.

      these are all common trick of the trade in the proprietary softare industry (microsoft first and foremost among them all). it's the natural inclination to try to wrap up your customer base like a fly in a spider's web. open source guards against this by ultimately making every aspect of a system at least discoverable, even if not a bonafide standard.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  44. Re:Where? by spektr · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is a dark and fearsome land, beyond the scary edge of the world. So, Americans can't go there - you'll fall off...

    This is crap - it can be done and it has been done. It is well known in American circles that Europe was discovered in March 1493, when Columbus sailed back to Spain.

  45. EU politics 101 spelling flame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Will they push ahead with these plans or is it just more talk?
    They will push ahead with these plans, *and* it is just more talk.
  46. No, you're mistaken about the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My good man, you underestimate the power of the Market.

    The Market is present even when it is not.

    The Market is what gives a young entrepreneurial man his power, it's an energy field created by all intellectual property, it surrounds us, it penetrates us, it binds the galaxy together.

    Rand be praised! Peace be upon her.

    1. Re:No, you're mistaken about the market by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      Where are the 'Funny' mod points of the above post?

      LOL!

  47. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bite me.

  48. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by Lord+Graga · · Score: 0

    I'm danish.. Did we send snow-plows? I think you, at least with the snowplow-thing, really thought about the swedes..

  49. Re:Where? by TheCoop1984 · · Score: 1

    thats cos the vikings still live there, hiding in caves and whatever is the denmarkish for fjiords...

    --
    95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
  50. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FREE GREENLAND! Stop Danish imperialism! Support Greenland workers who labor under sweatshop conditions making sealskin garments for rich New Yorkers! Stop the baby seal clubbers! Denmark out!

    Now the news. Greenland. A bunch of misinformed Americans stormed the country and burned down a local sauna to which a frightened witness pointed them when they asked where they could find "the sweatshop". When they later tried to free some animals they mistook for seals they were surrounded by angry penguins on the beach and driven back into the ocean where most of them drowned. The few remaining made three humpback whales, five tumblers and a fishing cutter run ashore when they tried to reach the beach again. Greenland's local officials could not be reached for comments, because they are still sorting out what was going on.

  51. Re:Where? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

    fjiords

    OT - didn't Slartybartfast win an award for those?

  52. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. Hold fingeren frem!

  53. oh, but.. by ben_of_copenhagen · · Score: 1
    a snowplough can be a fearsome weapon in the hands of the right user. Actually its probably also a dangerous kind of thing in the hands of the wrong user.
    Anyway, my good friend Bjorn got run over by a snowplough as a child, and he is still kind of weird. He is also very afraid of horses

    And yes, i live in Denmark too!

    1. Re:oh, but.. by zonix · · Score: 1
      a snowplough can be a fearsome weapon in the hands of the right user.

      Watch out for the suicide snow plower. :-)

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    2. Re:oh, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh but a snow thrower/slinger is more dangerous.
      The kind the use in the alps...
      2 m diameter rotating beast!
      And it rotates fast!

      Think about using one of those against demonstrating peace lunies...

  54. Re:Pure and beautiful XML document format won't ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If its not better why would I switch?

  55. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stikker en finger frem ;)

  56. Re:Bundles are the answer!! NeXT had this years ag by amitupadhyay7 · · Score: 1

    You mean like:
    $ ls
    chap1.sxw
    $ file chap1.sxz
    chap1.sxw: Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract
    $ unzip chap1.sxw
    Archive: chap1.sxw
    extracting: Pictures/10000000000002BB000000E0A5892BF2.jpg
    extracting: Pictures/10000000000001AA000000E98217936A.jpg
    extracting: Pictures/10000000000001CD000000FB9C72793D.jpg
    extracting: Pictures/10000000000001C30000010DA8FFD18C.jpg
    extracting: Pictures/100000000000026B000000B59CB54057.jpg
    extracting: layout-cache
    inflating: content.xml
    inflating: styles.xml
    extracting: meta.xml
    inflating: settings.xml
    inflating: META-INF/manifest.xml
    $

  57. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    penguins,....??

    sorry, no penguins in greenland... onley seals and big scary white bears. (which actually see americans as food)

  58. MS FUD by danme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And now we only have to wait for the FUD to come along from Redmond on this topic too ...

  59. Garbage In - garbage Out by r7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What could have been a good paper was, sadly, another example of researcher bias. Perhaps the the worst of it is their cite of a 2001 IDC comparison of Linux vs. Unix TCO. IDC claims that "Linux, which is open source, and Unix, which is proprietary"! Really? Haven't they heard of BSD? How about OSX? They really dig themselves into a hole further down where they explain this claim!

    There's a table comparing Unix and Linix item costs. Somehow "deinstallation and disposal" costs 7x more for Unix (RICS/Unix) than Linux. This may be true for really cheap x86 hardware vis-a-vis mid to high end RISC, but a more realistinc RISC system like the Blade100 would be at most 2x its x86 analog. They completely left out Solaris x86, Mac OSX, and Linux SPARC? A monkey could see that this is comparing apples and oranges.

    The Danish Board of Technology/IDC also indicates that "website management" administrative costs are 60% higher for Unix than Linux, among the other similarly biased garbage out.

    The very next table indicates about the same level of selective garbage in for software cost comparisons. Makes you wonder exactly what they're smoking^H^H^H^H^H using.

    It's too bad too. You'll never sell MS buyers on Linux or Unix, much less MacOS, with such shoddy and easily shot down "research". 5 to 10 SuSE funded the paper and supplied the "researchers".

    r7

    1. Re:Garbage In - garbage Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDC claims that "Linux, which is open source, and Unix, which is proprietary"! Really? Haven't they heard of BSD? How about OSX?

      UNIX is a trade mark of the Open Group. The Open Group sets standards to certify a product as UNIX. Any product not certified by the Open Group is not UNIX. BSD is not UNIX. OSX is not UNIX.

  60. Inherently bad, not inherently worst by niom · · Score: 1

    I think the study is only recognizing that being locked into a irreplaceable propietary platform is a problem. It's not saying that it's the only or even the worst possible problem.

    Common sense as this may seem, it needs to be said anyway. How many companies realized before adopting .DOC as a de-facto standard that this effectively prevented them from switching to non-Microsoft solutions, should the need arise?

    --
    -- Repeat with me: "There is no right to profits".
  61. Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't they fucking ignorant?

  62. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazingly the danish word for fjiord is fjord. The plural of which is fjorde.

    -- Christian

  63. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your informations are dated. I just moved to greenland. I like Americans, too.

  64. Re:Inherently bad? Yes. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    No, Inherently bad is correct.

    If the government requires that all communications be in MS Word format, everybody wanting to do business with the government suddenly has to pay money to Microsoft. Either that, or break the law. Neither option is really all that great.

    And don't try to tell me that you can save your OpenOffice documents in MSWord format, that's flakey at best.

    If, on the other hand, the government required all communication to be in PDF, then it would be a level playing field. You can create PDFs with OpenOffice, or Adobe products, or whatever. You can create PDFs with vim, but that's easier said than done :)

  65. Re:Where? by spektr · · Score: 1

    Amazingly the danish word for fjiord is fjord.

    But most amazingly the english word for "fjiord" is fjord, too. What language is "fjiord", and is this all amazing at all? In any case, I like this thread.

  66. All talk by Fafner · · Score: 1

    As a dane I can safely say that this is all talk and no they want push ahead with anything. Denmark is one of the most Microsoft-centric countries in Europe. What a shame.

  67. Use state.giv instead ... by zonix · · Score: 1
    See the CIA World Factbook Entry for more info.

    Actually, if you want to learn something about Denmark, then state.gov's info on Denmark is a much more informative resource.

    I recommend reading the 'People and history' and 'Cultural Achievements' sections.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  68. Looks good but.... by bYTEREALm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ive hears about these initiatives in my country before, and well talk is cheap. I'm a free software user and supporter. We need at least open standards for all companies wanting to do business with our goverments. Open source would be nice, but i could settle for open standards as the next best thing.. ;) And yes we danish are a lot more than pastry, for years we were known and feared as the notoriuos vikings at sea. Tro det eller lad vaer - Believe it or not.. ;)

  69. How is the parent "funny"? by eetu · · Score: 1

    Why is the parent modded "+4, Funny"? I find it interesting and informative, but there isn't anything "funny" about it really. (Well, I do find it funny that people still bother to vote, as if it would actually make a difference, but that's another story...)

    --
    "If I can't have a revolution, what is there to dance about?" - Albert Meltzer
    1. Re:How is the parent "funny"? by bstadil · · Score: 1
      The report is from the Board of Technology, that have many good and forgotten discussions

      Read again

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  70. Re:Where? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Second: FREE GREENLAND!

    I agree, I am sick and tired of sending Greenland money every. They want to be free, but they also still want to recieve the money.
    So they are pretty fast to shut up about wanting to be free when they get told that it means no more money.

  71. Hear, hear! by MZdoctor · · Score: 1

    Well said, Pfafrich. The overriding importance of Open Standards cannot be overemphasized. Although it won't be easy, the job of selecting preferred open standards should really be carried out at the highest possible level, i.e. the EU. Or the UN .... one can dream.....

  72. Re:Where? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    I don't so I will end it here!.. here goes!

    You sir, are worse than Hitler!

  73. Not too bright by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 0, Troll

    And the prime minister of Denmark are a jerk who likes to kiss Americas ass. I still wonder why he didn't take the advice from Bush and let Turkey join the EU.

    I only feel sorry for the soldiers that have to spend years and years cleaning up the mess.

  74. to follow your logic ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    TCP/IP is a technology trap. Let each hardware/software vendor adopt its own communication protocol and have gazillion protocol converters. THis surely will keep programmers busy. Choice, my ass. Consumers want the choice of *applications*, not the choice of low-level standards, such as OO XML-based document layout.

  75. What part don't you understand? by Penguin · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on! My Mozilla breaks the (fixed) example down to:

    <w:wordDocument xml:space="preserve">
    <o:DocumentProperties> ... </o:DocumentProperties>
    <w:fonts> ... </w:fonts>
    <w:styles> ... </w:styles>
    <w:docPr> ... </w:docPr>
    <w:body> ... </w:body>
    </w:wordDocument>

    The actual body is really, really simple:

    <w:body>
    <wx:sect>
    <w:p>
    <w:r>
    <w:t>Hello World</w:t>
    </w:r>
    </w:p>
    <w:sectPr>
    <w:pgSz w:w="12240" w:h="15840"/>
    <w:pgMar w:top="1440" w:right="1800" w:bottom="1440" w:left="1800" w:header="720" w:footer="720" w:gutter="0"/>
    <w:cols w:space="720"/>
    <w:docGrid w:line-pitch="360"/>
    </w:sectPr>
    </wx:sect>
    </w:body>

    People really should not degrade themselves by pretending that they're not able to comprehend simple XML. If it's incomprehensable use Mozilla or IE (or a dedicated XML-editor) to view the XML-file.

    It's structured - it's not meant to be looked at as one long line in a slashdot-post.

    --
    - Peter Brodersen; professional nerd
    1. Re:What part don't you understand? by dspeyer · · Score: 1
      Well, one part I don't understand is
      <w:sig w:usb-0="21007A87" w:usb-1="80000000" w:usb-2="00000008" w:usb-3="00000000" w:csb-0="000101FF" w:csb-1="00000000"/>
      I think it has something to do with fonts, because it's in a <w:font w:name="Tahoma"> block, but other than that, I'm lost.

      Even in the section you quoted, what do the 1440 and 1800 mean? I would assume margins, but in what units? I suppose that would be easy to find out -- assuming they're something sensible (some real multiple of inches).

      It's not good enough to extract the text. The task is to retrieve all information in the document.

    2. Re:What part don't you understand? by davebert · · Score: 1

      Well, 1440 suggests the margins are specified in twips (1 twip = 1/20 point = 1/1440 inch). So 1800 would be 1.25 inches.

  76. You are a Dane yourself by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 0, Troll

    At least that's what you say.

    I wondered because I didn't figure that any American can locate Denmark on a map or even knows about the participation in Iraq, implementing the bush doctrine for a better world(tm).

  77. Whose logic are you following? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consumers want the choice of *applications*, not the choice of low-level standards, such as OO XML-based document layout.
    In other words, it would be best for users (consumers, my ass) if the KOffice developers adopted the OpenOffice XML format for their suite, like the grandparent suggested, rather than killing off everything but the OpenOffice suite, which is what the great-grandparent wants (never mind the differing languages and project goals or the desires of the developers).
  78. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MORKNIBBER! Thats all i know...

  79. Danish Bread / Wiernerbrod by BjarneDM · · Score: 1

    Actually, in Danmark danish bakery is called 'wienerbrod'. That's because the baking techniques originated in Wien - the capitol of Austria. The technique was then refined by the danish bakers and re-exported, becomming known as 'danish' while we here in Danmark still honour the original place of origin

    1. Re:Danish Bread / Wiernerbrod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      capitol of Austria

      To further this exquisite thread, I'd like to point out that, unlike America, Austria doesn't have a Capitol.

  80. Re:Where? by geekster · · Score: 1

    Isn't that The Faroe Islands? Or both?

  81. Re:Where? by geekster · · Score: 1

    Cheese? Eeeew, never tried that... I think

  82. Re:Danish by geekster · · Score: 1

    Morknepper... and it sounds pretty dumb I'll tell ya

  83. Re:Where? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    True, I seem to recall the same sceneario from both, I think they are getting money too. Only they thought that they had found oil, but further research showed that there might not be any after all so the talk seemed to calm down.

  84. Re:Danish by acebone · · Score: 1

    Moderknepper lyder lidt mere dognerdansk - Morknepper lyder som en paedagog der fortaeller i TV-Avisen hvad bornene siger

    --
    Check out my PHP Url Validator
  85. Forgot the obvious by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

    What's this - beer, supermodels, semilegal canabis - you forgot the obvious: PORN :) Denmark was the first country in the world to legalize pornography and back in the early 70's that was major business for Denmark. A good thing the Internet didn't really exist back then. Would have been impossible to get any bandwidth in and out of the country.

    1. Re:Forgot the obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it was '67 for pornographic texts and '68 for pornographic visuals.

  86. EU to decide, what about the others globally? by OldHawk777 · · Score: 2, Funny

    On such issues the EU should not show itself to be as parochial as mainland China and the US Congress and President. The EU should request action by the UN to develop such globally important standards.

    Such "Open Technology" actions that do not focus on the UN as the only path towards success are counter productive for humanity and wasteful of valuable and limited resources.

    "Open Technology" for all of humanity to develop. Learning Environment Independent Architecture (LEIA) technology from digitized common format content to global broadcast hardware and software open source/standards. Research and Development (Medicine, Science, Technology, ...) centers that translate voice and/or documents on-the-fly (real-time) for Collaborative Learning Interactive Communities (CLIC), ... continue to all the benifits for developing nations and global business/commerse/markets/...

    GET MOVING ASAP for all humanity.

    OldHawk777

    Reality is a self-induced hallucination.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  87. Linus Torvald enjoys high standard of living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not as high as Bill Gates but that's because Linus has a day job and volunteers to produce something useful unlike Slashdot trolls.

    One day the community will be put ahead of the corporation and you will be eating your words.

  88. Sounds like a smart protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of taking the heat like France, donate things that won't be used to kill people.

  89. Re:Where? by Carthag · · Score: 1

    One of my American friends insists on calling me Denmarkian. I insist on calling him a fool.

  90. Re:Danish by geekster · · Score: 1

    Ja, du har ret. Sjovt at skrive pa dansk pa /. ... bliver nok snart mod'et offtopic

  91. Re:Where? by hazem · · Score: 1

    I'm relatively sure only one of you is correct!

  92. Re:Danish by Carthag · · Score: 1

    Vi har alligevel kun det skaeg vi selv sidder paa

  93. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn :/ Kan du side paa dit skaeg?

  94. Re:sweet!!! JUST WAIT THE FUN.... by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    In case you have not noticed most gov docs are available in PDF which is already an open format. That is the next big target Redmond will focus on, after crushing Linux, Adobe is next. The EU knows this so does Adobe. Hell the very fact that MS office or Windows does not include a PDF reader should clue most people in.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  95. Re:Well, at least some part of government has brai by flacco · · Score: 1
    In addition, they say they did not receive stakes for their tents nor morphine for the medical service,

    Jeez, spikes and smack - those socialist northern european junkies will never change.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  96. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Still feared in East England because of our past"

    ???

    I think feared is a bit strong.

    The Danish football team is a respected adversary but the threat of longboats full of phycopathic vikings is not something that affects property prices in East Anglia these days.

  97. Re:Where? by nilenico · · Score: 1

    Nah - he won for the Norwegian fjords.
    Not a whole lot of fjords in Denmark. Lots and lots in Norway. Come see our beautiful scenery! Come see... oh, sorry.

    --
    .sig? No.
  98. Re:Bundles are the answer!! NeXT had this years ag by Leeji · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've got a good point, but at the same time you're also illustrating mine :)

    I'm not saying at all that any given document format sucks. What I'm saying is that XML starts to become a poor framework once the format grows powerful enough. A cool XPath query isn't really that cool when you still have to unpack the binary blob it returns! Bundles sound like a good document format, as do many of the other binary-based formats.

    Don't get me wrong -- I am fully behind XML document formats, and quite enjoy the standardization that XML has brought to data interchange. I just think that any sufficiently powerful XML-based document format will end up working around XML for certain things, not with it.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  99. Re:Where? by Plammox · · Score: 1

    What the Americans insist on calling Danish pastry is so poor, I lost my appetite for the rest of the day when I tried it on my recent visit to the US. Combine this with American bad quality coffee, and there's even a better reason to stay at home in Europe.

  100. What a naieve point of view. by turgid · · Score: 1
    We need more people working on OpenOffice. OpenOffice is the only product that has a chance against MS Office.

    Who's "we"?

    The world needs more diversity of software. More choice not less. A healthy software ecosystem depends on a wide variety of different software, all suited to doing particular jobs well, not one or two giant monoliths trying to do everything, and doing it badly as a consequence.

    File format compatability is needed. We're getting there, thanks to projects like OpenOffice.

    One size does not fit all. For example, on a small machine for light-weight tasks, AbiWord might be appropriate. OpenOffice.org would be overkill (and might be too big to run on the hardware). In another case, people may want tight integration with KDE, hence KOffice.

    Please, less of the zealotry and more pragmatism.

    1. Re:What a naieve point of view. by jdifool · · Score: 1

      Hi, actually this is not a naive point of view, but more something like opposite strategies. Some people think the free community should do its best to crush Microsoft's monopoly. Ans some other argue that the very same community should just try to improve its own 'ecosystem'. Of course we need choice, and of course we need momentum. I agree when it is said that OpenOffice lacks developpers : it could me moved into a versus-MSOffice tank. But it does not imply that everyone in the world is compelled to develop OpenOffice. Should diversity be sacrificied to strength, disaster. But what if not enough strength to resist ? Bye, jdif "The reward of a thing well done is to have done it." Emerson

      --
      Let's overcome our weakness.
  101. Re:Where? by turgid · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't know. From what I've seen of the inhabitants of Maldon, in Essex, there's still a lot of irrational fear and hatred going about... but that's just of each other on a Friday night. Goodness knows what they'd do to a buch of Danes visiting...

  102. Errors in the original posting. by jhorlyck · · Score: 2, Informative

    As one of the authors, I will point to one major and one minor error in the original posting: - It is not a report from the government, but from the Danich Board of Technology - an independet, public technology assesment board. - It was not a 2 year study. Work started in jan. 2002 and the Danish report was published on oct. 12, 2002. The English translation (financed by EU Commision) was published last week. The report is available from www.tekno.dk

  103. UNICODE by meadowsp · · Score: 1

    ...only if you use the english character set, otherwise you're a bit screwed.

    Hence unicode.

  104. Re:sweet!!! JUST WAIT THE FUN.... by jhorlyck · · Score: 1

    PDF is a proprietory format. Owned by Adobe.

  105. Re:Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of lovely parrots too!

  106. Submarine wanted by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Denmark owns one or two old submarines and many intelligent people have remarked that such a small country could spend its money on less stupid weapons. NATO and uncle Sam disagree however, and whenever DK asks NATO which weapons they should send to conflict area XYZ, the answer is ALWAYS the submarine, even if XYZ happens to be inner Mongolia.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  107. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hej pa er skaningar och andra danskar.

  108. Re:sweet!!! JUST WAIT THE FUN.... by qtp · · Score: 1

    PDF is a proprietory format. Owned by Adobe.

    If this is out there, then I can see no reason that MicroSoft can't roll thier own PDF filters, viewers or editors.

    --
    Read, L
  109. Obligatory Shakespeare Reference... by qtp · · Score: 1

    Just follow your nose.

    --
    Read, L
  110. Re:sweet!!! JUST WAIT THE FUN.... by Afty0r · · Score: 1
    PDF is a proprietory format. Owned by Adobe.


    No, it is not.
  111. Re:Danish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    har du ikke skaeg i maasen?

  112. Re:sweet!!! JUST WAIT THE FUN.... by jhorlyck · · Score: 1

    Yes it is. Just look into the specification: "NOTICE: All information contained herein is the property of Adobe Systems Incorporated." Adope publicises its proprietory specifications and makes them open to be used under the conditions, set by Adobe.