Slashdot Mirror


Which Adware and Spyware are the Most Insidious?

the_dreadnought asks: "I was just asked today which adware and spyware are the most insidious by an acquaintance. He asked me if this stuff was really legal, or was it just not important enough for law enforcement to deal with? I know the porn stuff (not from experience,,,ok, from experience) that dials out to foreign countries is one of the more extreme examples, and Gator is well known, but if Slashdot readers could describe what adware and spyware they think is the sneakiest I would appreciate it. Also, any thoughts on whether some of this stuff is even legal, as it is almost certainly not ethical."

38 of 840 comments (clear)

  1. New.Net by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I do tech support, and one of the worst things I've seen is a piece of software called New.Net. While not technically spyware (though that's arguable), it actually overwrites parts of the user's TCP/IP stack so that any time they access the internet (not just their browser), it gets pushed through the (usually fairly buggy) New.Net DLLs.

    And the fun part is, if you (or the user) uncheck the New.Net software in MSCONFIG, it doesn't just stop New.Net from working... They simply stop being able to use the internet. At all. So then we have to pray that their version of New.Net has a working uninstaller, or we have to go through a huge manual uninstall that involves removing multiple registry keys. BTW, if anyone here gets this or other spyware that is difficult to remove, try using a program called HijackThis and "Fix" anything that looks out of the ordinary (use common sense... don't delete everything).

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:New.Net by Jouster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They used to offer a 5- to 10-cent "bounty" for each copy of New.Net you installed; that's why it was bundled with a lot of other programs.

      The bounty program was discontinued, however.

      Jouster

    2. Re:New.Net by mikeswi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      New.Net is not spyware, although it is commonly believed that it is because it is targeted by antispyware software. The closest appropriate term would be "Unsolicited Commercial Software" or perhaps "Foistware" because it comes bundled with unrelated software. It does no tracking of the user and doesnt' even display advertisements.

      As for removing it, they took a lot of shit a couple of years ago because their uninstaller didn't work, so they fixed it. It works perfectly from add/remove and this has been verified by myself and by other members of our message board. If it doesn't for some reason, official and accurate manual instructions are located at http://www.newdotnet.com/#remove

      Please do not use HijackThis to remove any part of New.Net. It is a powerful tool, but it is not an antispyware program and not designed to uninstall software. It's purpose is to list anything that is not a default setting so that we can track down brand new spyware. If you don't know for an absolute fact that an entry absolutely should go, leave it and ask for advice first. You can hose Windows pretty good if you are not careful.

    3. Re:New.Net by lamabile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ".....it actually overwrites parts of the user's TCP/IP stack"

      Our software does NOT overwrite the TCP/IP stack; it adds itself to the TCP/IP stack.

      ".....so that any time they access the internet (not just their browser), it gets pushed through the (usually fairly buggy) New.Net DLLs."

      This information is false. Internet access is NOT pushed through our software. Our software recognizes when the user is trying to access a New.net domain name extension and ONLY then does it route the user through our software.

      "And the fun part is, if you (or the user) uncheck the New.Net software in MSCONFIG, it doesn't just stop New.Net from working...They simply stop being able to use the internet."

      I'm not sure where you thought that using MSCONFIG would stop our software from working. The RUN registry entry that you are referring to, does not affect the fucntionality of the software. That registry entry is used to update the software. Disabling this registry entry will NOT disable Internet access but it will prevent our software from updating.

      "So then we have to pray that their version of New.Net has a working uninstaller,"

      All of the versions of our software came with a working uninstaller. However, some uninstallers were rendered useless once a "tech support rep" started to use unconventional and unsupported methods of removing our software.

      "....or we have to go through a huge manual uninstall that involves removing multiple registry keys."

      There is no need to use any such manual removal procedures to remove our software. Proper removal instructions and accurate information about our software can be found at http://www.newdotnet.com.

      Leonard Amabile
      Director of Customer Support
      New.net, Inc.

  2. RealOne by JanusFury · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure there aren't many people who agree with me, but I personally consider RealOne to be spyware. It's intrusive and has lots of 'features' that are extremely difficult to turn off if you can turn them off at all, and it installs things without telling you. (For example, its 'message center' in the system tray that tells you to Buy RealNetworks Products(tm)(r)!0

    Other than that, I don't really run into spyware much, but I find gator and its kin to be the most intrusive and common on the web.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:RealOne by shird · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for the record, I agree with you. It completely overtakes your system, replacing home pages etc. Even the media has support for causing popups with its 'media browser' or whatever they call it.

      They used to also have a screen which allowed you to sign up for newsletters.The first checkboxes would all be clear, but scroll down a bit to the ones hidden and they would all be checked!... Its some of the scummiest software I have ever seen, and unfortuantly there is no other player which plays their media.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    2. Re:RealOne by desenz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You hit that one on the head. I don't get much other spyware, because its usually easy to avoid (as long as you know what not to download, and aren't using IE) I don't think its even worth usuing Real to begin with. Qualitys not that great, and if you've got the bandwidth quicktime is a far better choice in my eyes.

      That said, not everyone has the bandwidth or time to spend on it. And some just don't care.

    3. Re:RealOne by owlmon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Its some of the scummiest software I have ever
      > seen, and unfortuantly there is no other player
      > which plays their media.

      JetAudio plays Real Media. I like it, and I don't think that it is spyware. Would someone please post if I am wrong!

    4. Re:RealOne by chgros · · Score: 2, Interesting

      quicktime is a far better choice in my eyes
      Except that the quicktime player is not much better than Real Player IIRC (with popups telling you to go "pro" or somesuch).
      Anyway along with Real Alternative goes Quicktime Alternative, but I haven't had much luck with these (I haven't tried a lot though, since I mainly use GNU/Linux)

    5. Re:RealOne by OYAHHH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm,

      Not sure if StartupMonitor will stop Real in it's tracks, at least in terms of dropping things in your startup/system tray, but it is definitely worth a look.

      StartupMonitor just sits around and waits for a program to try to install itself into your system tray. If it detects such activity it pops up a message asking you if you want to allow it.

      I can proudly state that I only have four icons in my startup tray and each and every one of them I want to be there.

      Google for StartupMonitor and you shall receive...

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    6. Re:RealOne by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That hide feature on the bar is so deceptive.

      I -like you, disable it from every machine I clean up.
      Kazaa continues to run for the user that installed it, and all the other things - realplayer, winamp etc are all common and not required. People wonder why their machines take so long booting with all the crap its loading.
      At least if they can *SEE* that something is running they can make a concious decision to close it.
      The Search bars from various places are becoming a pain in the rear at the moment. My final action is usually disabling 3rd Party browser enhancements.

      My personal pet-peeve is with so called Popup-stoppers. I have seen some which popup a message to tell you they have blocked a popup.
      Its totally insane!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:RealOne by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Don't forget Xine. It plays most of real media stuff (FAQ).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  3. A more interesting question might be: by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Should the purveyors of operating systems be prosecuted for allowing software to run on their loyal customers computers, without their knowledge or permission. I have never read a Microsoft EULA in it's entirety, does it mention that this is part of the agreement?

  4. Windows Media Player... by penguinrenegade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    gets my vote. Not only does it report your media files, but also any other apps you're running!

    /me adjusts tinfoil hat...

  5. hotbar by a.koepke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One program that really annoys me is hotbar. The main reason so, it adjusts your MS Outlook settings all the time turning off using Word as your HTML editor. It also requires about 2 hours to remove the stupid program.

    You remove it using AdAware and it will remove it for that user profile. Then login as another user it will actually install itself again. I logged on as each user to remove it and finally managed to get rid of it, so I thought. It has now appeared back and I know it wasnt the (l)users installing it again since I gave them a lecture about adware and installing crap on machines that I am in charge of.

    If a program comes with a valid uninstall feature then I can tolerate it. When its a program thats a biatch to get rid of and keeps coming back I get really ticked off.

    --


    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    1. Re:hotbar by Dunark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The company I work for has officially designated Hotbar as a "security risk", and has put a Hotbar remover utiity on their desktop support website.

  6. Xupiter is evil? Agreed 100% by redgopher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DEAR GOD! My stomach turns every time that name is mentioned. I worked as a CSR at a local ISP for a year or so, and every time Xupiter was mentioned, nearly all of the employees within earshot would mutter, "Aw, jeez" or something else to that effect.

    On another note, I think that Gamespot's download manager, Kontiki, is kind of sneaky.. at least sneaky in the fact that I thought it was just another humble download manager. Then again, why would anyone want you to have their download manager unless they were spying on you?

    Stupid me. Oh well... thank god for Ad-aware.

    --
    Insert clever one liner here.
  7. Pre-Installed Dell Software by Jouster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about Dell's SupportLink, which (and I have the TCPdumps to prove this) broadcasts your system's S/N, your MS Windows S/N, and several other tantalyzing bits of data back to Dell every 30 minutes or so?

    Mind you, I love my Dell, but this pissed me off.

    Jouster

    1. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Call back at night when the guys in Bangalore are running the tech support line. The day shift in Round Rock missed the cluetrain, big time. I know it's fashionable to dis Indian techies but Dell seems to have found real geeks there. They were able to talk a friend through a hardware upgrade where the Round Rock boys would have left him playing driver whack-a-mole.

  8. pr0n dialers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when I worked at v!v!d V1deo, the boss loved the idea of the sneaky pr0n dialers the submitter talked about. (You click on a link that says "Free hot videos!" or whatever, and you get an active-x control which then downloads and installs a windows component and puts the icon on your desktop. Then when you doubleclick that, it actually hangs up your modem and dials out to a foreign country that has INSANE rates, several dollars a minute. Your phone bill can reach into the hundreds very quickly, and the phone company doesn't give a crap, you gotta pay if you want to keep using your phone!)

    Of course old steve's house is probably burning down today, as the simi valley fire has spread into the hills above chattsworth.

    Endorsing pr0n dialers will lead to your house burning down. QED.

  9. I agree with you by sweatyboatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't use RealPlayer at all. If for some reason a website offers only RealPlayer videos I just do without. not a big deal for me. much more annoying, as you say, to remove the tentacles of Real after you've installed their "free" player.

    -sweatyb

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:I agree with you by shogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to play Real Player movies under windows without the crap, just install it, then associated the files with Media Player Classic a neat little player that looks just like ole Media Player 6.x. (It also handles quicktime movies in a similiar fashion)

  10. Spyware that launches multiple processes by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know the name of the specific spyware, but one of my clients had spyware that would have two processes running at a time. If you terminated one of the processes, a new one would pop up, probably created by the other one. The process names were also random characters, meaning you couldn't just stop certain processes from startup. I did end up using WinPatrol, which is a lifesaver. It's able to look at services, processes, and startup items. It gives more information than just the names and is useful is stopping active processes and startup items.

  11. Re:Weatherbug by bivaughn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Weatherbug generates massive amounts of fragmented TCP traffic, frustrating Intrusion Detection Sensor administrators everywhere.

  12. I'll never know the name. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't think that spyware existed on MacOS X, but... my girlfriend came home from school last winter with something really odd. Internet Explorer would, no matter your user preferences, always go to a certain internet shopping site as a homepage. And would give you a barrage of popups constantly. I forget what shopping site, and back then I only had inbound firewalling, so I had no logs to check.

    No toolbars installed. No plugins. I created a new user account for her, and that worked, so apparently it hadn't messed with the internals of the Internet Explorer.app (which seems like a vector they'll soon exploit). Crappy, though.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  13. CoolWebSearch by sysadmn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See The CoolWebSearch Chronicles The story of a thousand hijacks.
    Quote:
    The difficulty of removing CWS from a user's system has grown from slightly tricky in the first variant to virtually impossible for the latest few. Some of the variants even used methods of hiding and running themselves that had never been used before in any other spyware strains. End Quote.
    15 variants so far....

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  14. Not just adware and spyware by Ryan+Mallon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More and more applications are becoming intrusive, software such as Winamp, Windows Media Player and Kaaza all having annoying dialog boxes which popup each time you run them if they detect a newer version which you haven't yet downloaded. MSN actually refused to do anything until I upgraded it.

    A large number of applications now have an online registration feature, they dont force you to do the registration, but they will bug the hell out of you if you choose not to.

    Applications such as RealPlayer try and sign you up to email based newsletters(spam), why should I have to give my details (email address, home address and hobbies for example) to a company in exchange for using their software?

    There seems to be a gradual increase in the invasiveness of software, currently most of these 'features' are still optional, but I dont think it will be long before many software companies start making things like software updates, online registration and having a valid email address mandatory.

  15. Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by billstewart · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Most of this software, while some of it is Ethically Challenged, doesn't have legal problems, at least in the US. The stuff claims to be free or cheap, and usually tells you that you'll get advertising, and even though it doesn't always tell you how much data it's collecting, it's usually not breaking any laws by doing it. Even the annoying features like popups or making your machine dog-slow aren't illegal, they're just misfeatures. Often you even have to press a "Pretended to read the fine print of the license" button for it to install.

    Some of it's not even broken ethically - if all they're doing with it is deciding which ads to show you, rather than tracking your every move online, especially if they didn't collect personal information about you, and if they didn't lie to you about what they were doing, and if they have a privacy policy that actually reflects what they're doing, that's ok. Not necessarily something you want to run, but ok. Some particular examples are the adware versions of Eudora and Opera.

    European data collection laws may have terms that popular spyware violates, but usually the spyware companies aren't based in Europe so there's no legal jurisdiction. The data collection laws themselves are often effectively spyware - in return for "protecting" you, they're also subjecting you to possible audits of your machines because you *might* have personal information about other people on your computer or your PDA or your cell phone. (Sure, they mostly pretend they wouldn't do that to regular citizens, only businesses, but it's pretty much a selective enforcement thing. And you are registering all your computers with the data protection bureau, aren't you?) But at least it doesn't slow your machine down when they're not auditing you.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  16. Re:One word...GATOR by H310iSe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I need help with Gator! One of my clients is hooked on it - it has, literally, hundreds of his passwords for god knows what websites, and he can't function without it. I know you can export and import the password file (as I had to do when I rebuilt his PC, god it pained me to install gator on a PC) but is there any way to extract the URL/Login/Password combinations? I spent a little time looking on Google but found nothing. Any help is welcome.

    --
    closed minded is as closed minded does
  17. weird google override by HermesHuang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On my laptop the dns for google seems to have been overwritten. Don't know what did it, but it always redirects me to this other search engine (forgot what its name is already). I've tried resetting the DNS tables with no luck. Now, whnever I want to use google, I have to just type in the IP address. I haven't been able to fix the problem - if anyone else has come across this, I'd really appreciate it if you could post how to fix the problem.

  18. Re:Obviously by morgue-ann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most insidious are the ones we don't even know about.

    Mod parent up MORE!

    Ding ding ding!!!

    Why has AIDS killed more people than Ebola? Because it takes long enough to kill the host that many more hosts can be infected. You'd be lucky if you make it to the airport once you contract ebola, let alone fly to the States and bleed out on a Manhattan subway platform at rush hour.

    We keep hearing about how horrible Blaster/SoBig/CodeRed &c &c are, but wait until the worm that's been in the wild for a year, spreading slowly & carefully so as to not alarm intrusion detection wakes up on some very large portion of Windows boxes.

    Someone mentioned Magic Lantern, but even though it might not be conventionally detectable, at least the source is sort of known. It's the people clever enough not to brag, even to their spouse/sibling/friend, and to keep the conspiracy small that are more dangerous. (I just self-selected out of this group)

    How many times have you loosened up a firewall's rules because it was interfering with something you were trying to do, then not tightened back up when you were done? If a worm knocked at your door once a month instead of 100 times per second, do you think you'd notice?

    Yeah, I've been reading too much Brunner.

    We had a worm that exploited the RPC hole running around work. We have a good firewall, so no one's ever directly compromised one of the unsecured machines inside (e.g. CVS pserver running with cleartext user list and no passwords) and Lotus Notes, though mostly execreble hasn't brought a worm inside (thanks, I think, to server-side virus checkers). However, people check their personal email accounts with Outlook. That gets a worm inside that spreads around to unpatched win2k boxes (all of 'em).

    IT's response was to update virus checker definitions and run full scans more often. Kills the worm, but it's back an hour later. The only way to kill such a worm without patching the machines (which they finally did) is to turn off the switch and clean every machine.

  19. Preventing Spyware? by kaptainsunshine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a end user admin on a small (300 machines ) network where both IE5 and Netscape4 are available ( and nothing else ) on WinNT4. I'm constantly fighting against end users that install spy/adware. I'm losing the battle and re-imaging machines on a daily basis... I'm looking for tips on reducing downtime due to this junk being installed. Any tips would be appreciated.

  20. Re:Bonzai Buddy by evilzippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes! Nasty little purple bastard. I informed one of our directors that it was a pest when I saw it on his home computer and he just said to leave it on there because "his kid likes it"... scary social engineering...

  21. Microsoft should fix windows by jonwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Basicly, any time a program wants to do something like put something in startup or modify winsock settings or stick files in windows system folder or modify the hosts file or dns settings or things like that, windows should come up with a nicely worded warning about why clicking "yes" is a bad idea.
    Also, it should log all these actions so that for example, you can see which programs installed what settings (so you know what to remove)
    And it should have something that allows sysadmins to turn off these things completly (just like how its possible to turn off control panel and other system things)

    That way, when some idiot wants to install kazza, the system detects that kazza wants to install "privacyviolatingspyware.exe" to c:\windows\system\importantmsfile.exe" and add it to startup and denies the request.

    What should be done when the request is deined (either because its completly switched off or because the user clicked "no") is that it should return for file i/o calls "cant open file" and for registry calls whatever the appropriate error is.

    Or better yet, pretend to write to the registry or the file but dont actually do it.

  22. The list is too long by GuruHal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a service tech I see New.Net, Xupiter, Gator, and Savenow all the time, but I didn't see Marketscore in there anywhere. It proxies your connection through one of Marketscore's own servers - I'm sure its for better service not actually spying on your content ... Whatever. Sometimes MArketscore adds 2 minutes (yes minutes) to a boot time and all your info is router through through their insecure proxy server. Total garbage. It wreaks havok on our customers since our email servers will not allow email to be sent from outside our domain, so any customers that have it on their home systems and try to send email get errors. The customers I talk to have no idea how it got there or why its running. Worst part is they don't understand how software doesn't show up in their add/remove programs section while running as a background process. It requires a command line uninstall process which is a bit elusive and makes many customers squirm.

    Recently TVT Media has made it onto my $#!T list - go through the uninstall process and it reports that it is gone but a reboot proves otherwise. In fact, if you remove the keys and then run the uninstaller and go back into the registry all the keys are regenerated. We'll see how much more press that kind of crap will get.

    Memory Blaster seems to be another growing problem on the horizon too, but its still pretty fresh to say how bad that one will be.

    In all truth new.net and Xuptier are probably the worst since they have a tendancy to destroy the winsock portion of the TCP/IP stack and take people offline when DNS queries are returned unresolved. Nice products: NOT.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
  23. The most insidious ones I have run across: by Mostly+PO'd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    lop.com and keenvalue aka wildmedia.
    They had morphed since being written about even 2 weeks before(of course I googled), and combined took me 4 hours to eliminate off of a client's Win98 PC. They used every dirty trick in the book to hide and re-install themselves: hidden startup files that rename randomly at each reboot, multiple startup locations, redundancy by installing themselves disguised as several different innocuous sounding programs, including maxmem, maxspeed, ie driver, ie update, People On Page, and more. I finally had to resort to verifying the legitimacy of every single program that was installed, and then manually scan the registry for references to all of the bad stuff. Oh, and by the way, this was after running adaware with the latest updates! (Which I still of course highly recommend, it was just behind on this one.) This stuff used every underhanded trick in the book to keep from being uninstalled. Combined these were far "stickier" than even the worst viruses I have dealt with.

    While this software may have been legal, it's methods IMHO should definitely NOT be. I would jump at the chance to join the butt kicking posse going after the sleaze/parasite/spy-ware vermin!

    "It's scum like this in my industry that lead to my handle"

  24. Re:Something to keep in mind... by ddimas · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Whether it is less than 1% or more than 10% of the population that is gay, depends entirely on the political agenda of the person or organization reporting the statistic.


    Not quite, the number reported depends on the political agenda of the reporter. The actual percentage depends on biological, and social factors, and the precise meaning of gay.


    Case in point, while the ancient Spartans took male lovers, were they gay? Careful how you answer that, Leonidas is standing next to you with a (sharp) spear. They certainly would have killed someone who is effete. Useless in war you know.

  25. National Privacy Principals by guru_Stew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Australia has National Privacy Principals which among other things forces companies that gross 3mil plus PA to inform users that data is being colledted and stored and for what purpose. it also must allow a person access to any data that is stored about them.
    There is also a bill in parliment that will do more and will have hefty penalties.

    I dont know exactly what XP sends to microsoft, other than SN details but the average user trusts MS and for the moeny they pay for a license they should be able to.