Slashdot Mirror


Cockroaches Daubed With Yeast As WMD Sensors?

Our Man In Redmond writes "OK, yeah, it sounds weird, but it just might work. Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have come up with the idea of attaching genetically-modified yeast to the back of a cockroach - or a cockroach-sized robot - and using the yeast to detect chemical or biological agents. The story's in today's Seattle Post-Intelligencer. They point out some other possible nifty uses for the yeast-based technology, like detecting diseases by having a patient blow on a piece of paper 'printed' with the yeast."

96 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Problem solved! by obsidianpreacher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fear not, terrorists, I've got your solution! Just make your WMD in really, really, really bright laboratories! Problem solved!

    *mumble mumble* ... what? Crap, I'm sorry ... gotta go ... some nice men in suits are here and need to talk about some "Patriot Act" or something ... I'll see you in about 20, I guess ...

    --
    topreacher@signature.slashdot.org 1% rm -rf sig
  2. blow... by sewagemaster · · Score: 1, Funny

    " like detecting diseases by having a patient blow on a piece of paper 'printed' with the yeast."

    now THAT's a blowjob

    1. Re:blow... by sewagemaster · · Score: 1


      and it's one type you dont have to worry about getting that yeast infection...

    2. Re:blow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not funny. I am one of the rare few men who have had the dubious honor of getting a yeast infection. Fortunately, I found out that I just needed to make some changes in my diet to counteract the negative effects of antibiotics I'd takedn over the years. Antibiotics can do a lot of damage to the body's natural defenses (secndary immune system) unless you are knowledgable enough to supplement your diet with probiotics as far apart from the antibiotics as possible. All I can say is that male yeast infection is probably akin to scorching your foreskin (or in my case the corona since I'm circumcised) with a curling iron. All the way around... first it starts as an incessant itch and within hours it blows up into a fullblown set of ulcerated skin. Almost made me think I had herpes except there weren't any blisters. So.. don't take yeast lightly. It's a nasty and very dangerous substance.

    3. Re:blow... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side. If you get a bread machine for Christmas, you're already halfway to enjoyable baking.

  3. Women and children first by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    Why work on such esoteric stuff when we have tons of people sitting idle?

    They can be our "smart detectors".

    1. Re:Women and children first by quigonn · · Score: 1

      Why work on such esoteric stuff when we have tons of people sitting idle?

      They can be our "smart detectors".


      Now _that_ would definitely lower the unemployment rate!

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    2. Re:Women and children first by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      So could WMD being snuck into the country. *shrug*

      --
      stuff
    3. Re:Women and children first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      because we have tons of cockroaches sitting idle.

      Put them to work!

  4. Just what we need..... by Rod76 · · Score: 1

    now we'll have groups complaining about roach cruelty...

    --
    Die First, Then Quit
    1. Re:Just what we need..... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "now we'll have groups complaining about roach cruelty... "

      Ever wonder if Starship Troopers had to deal with that? There's a propoganda scene with kids squishing cockroaches. Heh.

      I know, I know, I'm not very on-topic here. I just find it interesting that PETA and the like seem to value animal life over human life. During the Iraq War there was some information about specially trained Dolphins that could locate mines without setting them off. They'd relay the info back to a nearby sub so they'd know where not to be. No Dolpins were hurt, but the animal rights activists had their panties in a bunch. It's okay for a sub full of Americans to go down when striking a mine, but don't you dare put a dolphin in harm's way even when it's smart enough to avoid danger.

      Sorry for the lack of off-topicness here, I just wouldn't be surprised at all if a group like PETA were bothered by this. (Well maybe a little, they seem to care more about mammals than insects...)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Just what we need..... by pilot1 · · Score: 1

      This is somewhat offtopic as well, but it needs to be pointed out.

      I agree with you that PETA seems to value animal life, more than human life.
      But I also think that the argument could be made that they're hypocrites. I don't expect them to make a big deal about this, and, if they don't, they would be _discriminating against cockroaches_ *gasp*

      What I'm saying, is that they seem to value some animal life more than other animal life. Why? Maybe because cockroaches disgust some of them?
      And that's hypocrisy. If they're going to argue for animal rights, they should at least argue for all animals rights (and make themselves look even stupider at the same time).

  5. And how will this pan out? by screwballicus · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Cockroaches fail to find evidence of WMDs.
    2) Government asserts non-cooperation on part of regime under inspection with cockroaches conducting said inspections.
    3) ???
    4) Democracy!

    1. Re:And how will this pan out? by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      ...
      3) Cockroaches grow by an order of a magnitude due to the genetically modified yeast. All hail our genetically modified overlords.
      4) "Democracy!"

    2. Re:And how will this pan out? by glgraca · · Score: 1

      So int the US no.1 would fail rapidly and
      there'll never be no.4?

    3. Re:And how will this pan out? by rajafarian · · Score: 1

      Well, SOMEONE, is going to find the WMDs Bush is going to order be placed somewhere so he can look good and get re-elected. Dont'cha think?

  6. Yeast Based Technology by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Funny
    other possible nifty uses for the yeast-based technology

    Yeah, I know one "nifty" technology based on yeast: it's called "beer" and has been around for thousands of years. Hoooray for yeast! ;-)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Yeast Based Technology by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Do these mutated yeast make better beer? better bread?
      If yes to either, the benefits to humanity are infinate then!

      I welcome chemical reserach!
      Down with Shrub boy, back with So-Damn.

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  7. Need a name for this critter by arvindn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suggest cockroach + robot = "cockrobot" :)

    As an added benefit: "I, for one, welcome our new cockrobot overlords" has a nice ring to it.

    1. Re:Need a name for this critter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, but cockbot is a lot funnier

    2. Re:Need a name for this critter by cra · · Score: 1

      Or "botroach".

      Damn, that sounds like a cartoon! "Cockbot and Botroach". Heh, heheheh he-heh. . . :-)

      --
      This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
    3. Re:Need a name for this critter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking "ROBOCOCK" personally.

    4. Re:Need a name for this critter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      That joke was so close to being great. If only you'd made the leap from "cockrobot" to "cockbot", that could have been a hilarious post. Instead it's merely mediocre. Also your timing could use a little work. Furthermore, the cliched "overlords" bit just detracts from the original part of the joke.

      Overall, this joke gets a 5/10.
      -- Slashdot joke reviewer

    5. Re:Need a name for this critter by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      YHBT. YHL.

      Don't you get it? He intentionally picked the stupidest name possible to get flamebots like you to suggest 'cockbot'.

      It's like showing you this guy and making the joke that he is probably really good at banning gas.

    6. Re:Need a name for this critter by bunhed · · Score: 1

      cockbot == dildo

    7. Re:Need a name for this critter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cockrobot? My girlfriend already has one fo those.

    8. Re:Need a name for this critter by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      You sound like you are talking out of your bot-tocks. *groan*

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    9. Re:Need a name for this critter by aastanna · · Score: 1

      Sort of like this cartoon?

    10. Re:Need a name for this critter by sharkey · · Score: 1
      I suggest cockroach + robot = "cockrobot" :)

      Here is a concept drawing.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Need a name for this critter by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      Women will love it too! I can see the Ad copy now: Heidi Kluhm with a sexy voiceover " Who needs a man with my new cockrobot"

      --

  8. Detecting WMDs... by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Has become the new "Star Wars" angle for research. Looking for new Funding ? Unsure that it will get approved ? Well see how it could possibly be applied to WMD, it doesn't have to be sensible, it just has to be enough to get the funding. After all there are people of billions of dollars out there who can't find WMD, so your research not doing it either won't change anything.

    This is for the diagnosis of illnesses, pure and simple. And at 2am in a bar when the funding review was at 10am the researchers had an idea.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Detecting WMDs... by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

      Hmm good point, but at least in this case USA's paranoia / imperialism / big-brotherism generates something useful for the rest of the world. I'd prefer if the Americans pour money into peaceful ways to "detect WMD" instead of sending armies to crush third-world countries, especially if these ways can be applied to useful stuff like medicine.

      Then again, right now, we don't have much defense against biological weapons, whether they come from "terrorists," lunatics or enemy countries. So any developments in that direction is a good thing.

  9. O-kaaay... by geekwench · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Personally, I'm hoping for the mini-bots to be used in this technique, rather than actual cockroaches. When you look at the type of environment that the little buggers prefer, the Feds would be "finding" chemical and biological agents in every alley dumpster in the country. Not to mention the apartments of a large percentage of bachelor males. At least the robots will presumably go where you want them to.

    Young bachelor to FBI agent: "That's not a biological weapons lab, man; that's my kitchen!

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
  10. My baker isn't a terrorist by Grave_Rose · · Score: 1

    So, I guess I can rest assured that the guy down the road baking baguettes isn't a terrorist then? ;)

    Gr@ve_Rose

    --
    !ekoj on si aixelsyD
    1. Re:My baker isn't a terrorist by peterpi · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why not have him take the 4-step Dubyamatic Terrorism Survey?
      1. Do you have skin darker than a manilla envelope? If no, go to (4)
      2. Do you have a beard? If no, go to (4)
      3. Congratualtions, you are a terrorist!
      4. Unfortunately, you are not a terrorist this time. We encourage you to take the Dubyamatic Terrorism Survey again at a later date.
  11. Let's focus, people by writertype · · Score: 5, Funny

    Weapons of mass destruction. Biological outbreaks of plague. Medical sensors. Bah.

    There is one purpose for which yeast, and yeast research, should be put. Beer. Better beer. Beer that tastes great, but is less filling. Beer that I can drink until snookered, then wake up from the next day, hangover free.

    Beer.

    Any questions?

    1. Re:Let's focus, people by h00pla · · Score: 1
      And better bread too!

      --
      I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
    2. Re:Let's focus, people by Hallow · · Score: 1

      Beer, and bread as others have mentioned, but don't forget cider, meads, wines, and lots of other nifty beverages!

      I have 6 gallons of cider fermenting away in my living room as we speak. ;)

      Vegimite, marmite, promite, etc. can definately be removed from the list.

    3. Re:Let's focus, people by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

      I wonder how bad beer will start to taste once many varieties of genetically modified yeast escape into the environment.

    4. Re:Let's focus, people by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      There is one purpose for which yeast, and yeast research, should be put. Beer. Better beer. Beer that tastes great, but is less filling. Beer that I can drink until snookered, then wake up from the next day, hangover free.

      I can see it now: "Michelob Ultra cockroaches have 30% less carbs than Coors cockroaches."

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  12. Getting the coackroaches back by rf0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK this is cool You send the coachroaches out into an area where there is WMD. How do you check the yeast? Have the coachroacges on a really long leash? :)

    Rus

    1. Re:Getting the coackroaches back by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "OK this is cool You send the coachroaches out into an area where there is WMD. How do you check the yeast? Have the coachroacges on a really long leash? :)"

      Release the cockroaches, rent an apartment in Baghdad, and put a geiger counter under the sink. When a loud clicking noise wakes you up at 3am, call Geraldo. He'll draw a map for the good guys and the bad guys.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Getting the coackroaches back by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I wondered about that too. I figured they'd put some kind of small transmitter on the cockroach's back to signal if they got a positive read from the yeast.

      Or, they'd take the Rumsfeld approach and just hook the detector to the world's tiniest nuclear weapon. The yeast changes color, and BLAM! Problem solved.

      Of course then you have to worry about the 40-foot cockroach . . .

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    3. Re:Getting the coackroaches back by morgus+morphus · · Score: 1

      Don't cockroaches react to certain chemicals that can be used as bait?

      So you could send them out, then use a bait-laden trap to capture them again. I don't really see it working as an early-warning system though...

    4. Re:Getting the coackroaches back by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Of course then you have to worry about the 40-foot cockroach . . .

      Maybe you know something I don't, but I'd consider it rather conspicuous trying sneak a 40-foot cockroach into someplace to check for Windows Media Devices.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Getting the coackroaches back by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      Obviosly you are not familiar with terms of government sponsored research.
      a. it does not have to make sense
      b. collecting the results from runaway roaches might as well be the topic of the new round of research (and funding) for the next year.

  13. Doctor by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Doctor: "Sir, can you blow on this piece?" (points on a piece of papers, but the patient doesn't notice.)

    Patient blows.

    Doctor: "Ehmmm. You have herpes."

    Patient: "What? One blow, and you say I have herpes?"

  14. It won't work! by mstamat · · Score: 1

    Haven't they learn from Hollywood movies? In the most critical moment, a bad guy will squash the spy-roach under his boot and the good guys will have to find another way to get what they want.

  15. Aaah by bacon-kidney-pie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And when you get them back you can use them to make Vegemite

    1. Re:Aaah by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Insightful? What the? Where do you mods get off? Vegemite is an Australian spread (one might say icon, even though the yanks bought it out years ago) not cockroach puree.

      And I don't think we'd want our happy little vegemites to glow in the dark after smearing some chemical weapons yeast extract, either. Roses in cheeks just wouldn't be in it then.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:Aaah by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Australian population in general would no doubt be much obliged if you send Steve Irwin out after WMDs.

      "Crikey, it's a big one, look at the plutonium on that-" [Camera pans out, mushroom cloud silently expands to the clouds, and another Aussie stereotype dies a long-awaited death]

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:Aaah by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      The Australian population in general would no doubt be much obliged if you send Steve Irwin out after WMDs.

      "Crikey, it's a big one, look at the plutonium on that-" [Camera pans out, mushroom cloud silently expands to the clouds, and another Aussie stereotype dies a long-awaited death]

      Oh Please Please, Yes, anything to get that loony tune of my telly. maybe I should start a we hate the Croc loony club.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
  16. Re:Of course... by corebreech · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Shouldn't we still try to at least develop countermeasures instead of "taking a kick in the balls"?

    Exclusive of any other effort? No. Absolutely not.

    Now, if some of you monkeys decide you're big enough to address the root cause of all this terrorism, and then, as a complement, work on new technology to thwart further acts of violence, then yeah, that would be good.

    But to continue to place all our faith in technology without understanding why people want to kill us? That's stupid.

    Are you stupid?


    By the way, here are 2,998 people who had nothing to do with America's "evil past".


    Actually, the number is now 2,976, idiot. If you bothered keeping current with the news, you'd know that. And yes, ordinarily such a correction would count as picking nits, but the fact of the matter is that it's because so many of you skip reading international news that we're in this mess in the first place. You're too busy watching football or wrestling.

    And so you are completely unaware as the rat monkeys who control this country continue to plunder and rape other nations, causing untold misery and grief... misery and grief which eventually finds it's expression in acts like 9/11, and who are more than happy to leave the rest of us exposed to the consequences.

    Did the victims of 9/11 deserve it? No more than any of the rest of us did. We all choose to remain ignorant of the evil deeds committed by our government, so in a very real sense, yes, we are responsible.

    I can only hope you were kidding when you say that the we let some of our major cities be destroyed, then use the term "rational leadership" in the next paragraph.

    Of course, I didn't say that. In fact, my council here was aimed at preventing such an occurance. And if you could a) read, and b) think, you'd understand that.

    Thank you for letting your stupidity screw the rest of us over.

    It's people like you that make me hope that hell really exists.

  17. Now that's too much by varjag · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, the USA not just destroys Iraqi infrastructure to stone age, they now want to flood the ruins with yeast-infected cockroaches?

    No limits to human cruelty..

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  18. Emmm... by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Cockroaches Daubed With Yeast As WMD Sensors?

    So if they are still alive when all humans are gone, we'll know it was a really, really good weapon. What? Oh...

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  19. I for one.. by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. welcome our new bread-making anthrax-detecting apocalypse-surviving insect overlords.

    1. Re:I for one.. by galego · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, bread-making anthrax-detecting apocalypse-surviving insect overlords welcomes you!

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

  20. Remote-Controlled Cockroaches by umofomia · · Score: 1
    OK this is cool You send the coachroaches out into an area where there is WMD. How do you check the yeast? Have the coachroacges on a really long leash? :)
    like this...
    1. Re:Remote-Controlled Cockroaches by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      "They are a little bit smelly, and there's something about the way they move their antennae. But they look nicer when you put a little circuit on their backs and remove their wings."

      Man, you so know this guy pulled the wings off of flies when he was a little tyke.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  21. Best Solution Ever!!! by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    Finally, a little yeast on the back of every SCO bigwig, folks of the MPAA, RIAA, MS Employees, and most government officials...and they're useful again!

    Who said we couldn't find good uses for vermin?

  22. Yeah... by jlemmerer · · Score: 1

    and with the correct software they will be able to provide "proof" that saddam actually had WMD's.
    Better than letting those robots search for weapons they should be used to help rescue workers in saving lifes. I think the small form factor would make it easy to let them search for survivors under collapsed buildings after earth quakes or - as we saw in Russia lately - help examine tunnels or mine shafts for survivors after accidents. Why does research always drift in the military direction? *sigh*

    --
    ".Sig Stealer" was here
    1. Re:Yeah... by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Croaches aint gonna detect nothing benneath the insecticide factory.

  23. Any questions about yeast research? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I got a question.

    What about bread?

    Um, to go with the beer, of course.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  24. The Next Step In Terrorism? by bboyers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The discussion on the yeast in the story seems like the easy part (IANABC-I am not a Biologist-Chemist), but making a cockroach that has enough power, is controllable (either remotely or through AI), and is actually useful would be the hard part.

    The civilized world has more to fear from the development of technology like this than the terrorists do. A cockroach is less of a threat to a terrorist hiding in a cave (they can find a new cave or have a pet snake to eat the cockroaches), verses nations that have nuclear powerplants, mass transit systems, and airplanes that could fall victim to a terrorist controlled cockroach-bots that likes to munch on wires/circuit boards and fuel lines.

    Development of miniature cockroach robots will initially be by First World nations, but the technology will proliferate much easier than nuclear capability ever did. It would be easier to hide a cockroach-bot program than a nuclear program, and a cockroach-bot will be more useful.

    1. Re:The Next Step In Terrorism? by nucal · · Score: 1

      Although Swimming Cockroach Robots are already in the works, I'm actually much more worried about terrorists developing this.

    2. Re:The Next Step In Terrorism? by shrinkwrap · · Score: 1
      "... but making a cockroach that has enough power, is controllable (either remotely or through AI), and is actually useful would be the hard part. "

      Sandia Labs has a number of 1 cubic inch robot "critter" designs. They are used in a "swarm" to cooperatively pinpoint threat (e.g., chemical release) locations and map threat contours. I saw several videos on this technology last month, and it's impressive.

  25. It's a WMD sensor and a snack food! by kahei · · Score: 1

    mmm... cockroaches daubed with yeast...

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  26. Countermeasure by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

    Won't the bad guys just buy a few cans of pyrethrin lacquer (the stuff you spray around ant holes). "I'm sorry, Mrs. Roach, but your husband is missing presumed dead. He crawled for what he believed in."

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  27. In The Future... by bboyers · · Score: 1

    ...it will be easy to spot the terrorist hiding WMD since they'll have huge collection of frogs, reptiles, birds and sharks with frickin' "laser" beams attached to their heads protecting their lair of WMD.

  28. Works for Windows Serves Too! by teledyne · · Score: 1

    Directions:

    1. Get access to your server.
    2. Blow yeast on it.
    3. ???
    4. If yeast turns green, there's a patch coming out soon. If it turns red, well, you're screwed.

  29. Hollywood has taught us... by escallywag · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... that it's a very bad idea to mix anything "genetically modified" and "cockroach"... Mimic anyone ? Am I the only one that envisions frothing swarms of sentient, mansized, flesh eating, multiplying-at-the-rate-of-yeast-bacteriae cockroaches surging out of Manhattans' manholes ?

    On a brighter note, it could also spawn a new breed of crunchy luxury beer called "Skuttlebrau"

  30. That's easy... by taped2thedesk · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... just have a cockroach with a tiny little camera strapped to its back go in behind the yeast roach.

  31. Re:Of course... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    i'll take 10,000 of those "monkeys" you talk about above 1 self-important pompous arrogant windbag like yourself

    your arrogant attitude and dim consideration of your fellow human being is part of the problem, not the solution

    you are not better educated about the problems of the world, you are merely drowning in self-righteous teenage-level cynicism about the world

    you're actually a dime a dozen, and you suck

    get back to us when you grow up, teenager

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  32. Around here... by aaaurgh · · Score: 1

    ...the only W.M.D. the cockies will detect is a can of Mortein or Raid, yeast or not! Pfffssst!

    --

    Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
  33. No, occifer... by csoto · · Score: 1

    That's not a open container of beer . It's a mobile WMD detection device!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  34. Re:Of course... by trynis · · Score: 1

    Actually, the number is now 2,976, idiot. If you bothered keeping current with the news, you'd know that. And yes, ordinarily such a correction would count as picking nits, but the fact of the matter is that it's because so many of you skip reading international news that we're in this mess in the first place. You're too busy watching football or wrestling.

    Actually, the number is now 2,750, idiot. If you bothered keeping current with the news, you'd know that. And yes, ordinarily such a correction would count as picking nits, but the fact of the matter is that it's because so many of you skip reading international news that we're in this mess in the first place. You're too busy watching football or wrestling.

    ;-)

    --
    This is not a sig.
  35. Re:Dubya will stop at nothing ! by Mignon · · Score: 1
    Come on Dubya, face it.

    There were no Weapons of Mass Destruction

    GWB knows there were - his dad has the receipts.

  36. Think of the cockroaches! by Hoplite3 · · Score: 1

    First the Navy trains dolphins to swim into mines, then the gov'ment is sending innocent cockroaches into the most hazardous sites without protection! Wait until PETA hears of this.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
  37. Is Orkin a Halliburton Subsidiary? by FartSmeller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, but at this point, the idea to 'infest' a country with cockroaches because they're suspected of harboring WMDs sounds like little more than a reaaally big contract for the Orkin Man.

    --


    You are in a little twisting maze of passages, all different. You're screwed.
  38. And you get the cockroach back, how? by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 1
    I'm sure someones said it already, but how are they supposed to get the cockroach back?

    Do they send the cockroach with its yeasty sensors off in search of WMD, and then sit outside waiting for it to come back. Are cockroaches trainable or something. Am I missing something here?

    I suppose homing pigeons have been be a bit obvious, and I guess if you send in enough cockroaches, one is bound to come back.

  39. Corporations pleased. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    In other news, sales of 'Raid' have increased dramatically in the middle-east.

  40. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    Now, only terrorists and "rogue" natious will have boric acid...

    --
    [o]_O
  41. Detection? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    Who needs the yeast? if the cockroaches die, chaces are theres WMD in whatever building youre searching.

    --

    1. Re:Detection? by Lowca · · Score: 1

      A cockroach can survive just about anything; something has to be really nasty to kill one. Hell, that's why they'd use cockroaches in the first place; they'll come back alive, even after days of living in conditions that would kill an unprotected human.

  42. Here is Hawaii... by surfcow · · Score: 1

    ... Cockaroaches ARE WMDs.

    "Oh good, here come the Americans with a nasty disease carrying pest which can not be killed."

    Not From Concentrate.

  43. WMD??? by sryx · · Score: 1

    Ok am I the only one who read the article title and thought "Windows Media Devices"? I guess cockroaches would be the best agents to find those suckers! :P
    -Jason

  44. #define WMD by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    Y'know, for 50 years or so, Weapons of Mass destruction were clearly defined as huclear fission 'A' or hydrogen fusion 'H' bombs.

    Suddenly two years ago GWB decides that Biological, Chemical and Radioactive "dirty" bombs are now WMDs.

    Let's be clear about this. Them beer-dipped roaches are not going to find any nukes ...

  45. Re:Of course... by corebreech · · Score: 1

    Actually, the number is now 2,750, idiot.

    No it isn't.

    That's the toll for the WTC alone.

    If you bothered to read the news, you'd discover that the WTC was not the only target of terrorism on that day.

    Retard.

  46. Re:Of course... by corebreech · · Score: 1

    your arrogant attitude and dim consideration of your fellow human being is part of the problem, not the solution

    I see, criticizing the wanton destruction of other nations/cultures constitutes a "dim consideration" of my fellow human beings.

    Right.

    Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

    I wonder why I chose the term monkey. Oh yeah, that's right... thank you for reminding me.

  47. Re:Of course... by corebreech · · Score: 1

    I can't tell you how many times I make that mistake.

  48. you can write 1,000 pages by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    of honest poignant cutting insightful analysis of world events

    but it will all mean absolutely nothing to anyone reading your words- it will even make people who would otherwise agree with you 100% bow their heads in shame and embarrassment and a desire to distance themselves from you

    as long as you continue to demonstrate your mocking, belittling, arrogant tone for your fellow human being

    that tone makes you an arrogant teenager, and not one bit more

    and so no one will listen to you

    you either understand this concept, or you understand nothing at all: your mocking tone makes you just as bad as all of the people you hate, for that mocking tone flows from the same "i am better than you and i have the right to treat you worse" bad psychological spot as all of the behavior you see that you hate

    you demonstrate the same arrogance as those you hate

    think about that

    if you don't understand why that is blindingly obvious to anyone reading your words and fills them instantly with disgust at your blatant hypocrisy, then you are completely lost to the debate you obviously care so much about

    i said it once, i'll say it again: get back to us when you grow up, teenager, and learn some simple respect for your fellow human being, at the very least develop an ability to demonstrate a surface-level appreciation of the concept that your holier-than-thou tone flat out sucks... otherwise, you are completely irrelevant to the debate you are engaging in

    simple as that

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you can write 1,000 pages by corebreech · · Score: 1

      your mocking tone makes you just as bad as all of the people you hate

      Hatred finds its ultimate expression in the killing of others. My anger doesn't come anywhere close to that.

      They aren't even remotely similar, you fucking retard.

  49. The ideation phase by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1
    "Even a cockroach with a yeast infection could find Iraq's WMD."
    "Excellent idea Jones, here's your grant, now go make it happen."
    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  50. i said by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "get back to us when you grow up, teenager"

    have you grown up yet?

    "you fucking retard"

    apparently not

    consider my talking to you to be intellectual charity, as most everyone else is not reading a word you say

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  51. Hmmm by meplaysocr · · Score: 1

    Say the yeast is engineered to detect human disease. Then a doctor could print up a yeast card, have a patient breathe on it and determine what illness the person has, Brinker said.
    And what if you have really bad breath? Will it tell you that you have cancer? Makes you wonder.

    --

    Sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
  52. Not only WMD -- there's a huge mainstream market by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine (who is a total pervert, deep into "upskirt" business and who even runs his own website dedicated to voyeurism deviation -- hi, Igor) told me recently that "an old-school shoe pinhole camera can only get us this far -- there are serious limitations which we need to overcome if we really want this industry to evolve." I am sure he could find a good use for these cockroaches as soon as they hit the mainstream market being equipped with a wireless mini camera. I can already see www.cock-roaches.com banner ads. This is really great news. (For perverts, that is.)

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."