Slashdot Mirror


Hercules USB DJ Console Reviewed

SpinnerBait writes "Professional DJs and House-Party Beat Masters alike, will certainly be interested in a new product that the folks at Hercules Audio are bringing to market shortly. Although you may remember Hercules for being one of the first in PC Graphics, HotHardware has a review and showcase up that takes a look at the new Hercules USB DJ Console. This little deck comes with dual mixing pads, for blending and scratching of your favorite MP3s etc. It also takes over as your main PC sound system, with full Dolby 5.1 capabilities, when plugged into any PC via USB."

26 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah right by O · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you're trying to tell me that professional DJs are going to ditch their pair of 1200s and huge collection of vinyl for some shitty little piece of plastic with a USB connector on it?

    Sure thing.

    --

    1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
    1. Re:Yeah right by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. The real DJs will use Final Scratch.

      (If you don't know about it, seriously check it out -- it works very, very well)

    2. Re:Yeah right by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      New technology doesn't have to replace old technology. We still use steam power today, the heat's just usually not generated by wood fire (still plenty of coal though, sadly.) The invention of the plane didn't replace the automobile. And this thing isn't intended to replace vinyl, just to make it easier to use the digital audio files that people are already using.

      DJs are going to augment their pair of 1200s and huge collection of vinyl with some shitty little piece of plastic with a USB connector on it. With an investment in some firewire drives and a mid-grade laptop, they can multiply their music collection many times for free by downloading from USENET. Sure it's illegal, but why am I even mentioning that? Just to prove I'm not a total jackass probably. You think the average DJ gives a shake if it's not a legal method of getting music? They will then have a searchable archive of music that they could not possibly give one fuck about, but which will sometimes make other people happy, which is part of the job, and they will have a decent interface to go with it. It also provides 24 bit audio, which for any purpose involving computers is nice; It's connected via USB, so much of the noise inherent in building your sound output hardware into a laptop which does not have much room for filtering hardware will be removed, and it also provides a 5.1 output so if you are lucky enough to have digital inputs into the sound system where you're playing, you can use them. It's got both coax and optical digital input and output, too, which is just nice to have around. It also has RCAs and a mini-plug; you can plug in basically anywhere with this without even bringing cables.

      (I admit that it might be nice to have quarter inch jacks, with one stereo and one mono (usable as two mono, but I think it's reasonable to pigtail for that. Certainly if I were building a serious professional device I would want those outputs, and to put this thing in a better package. I would consider offering it in a rackmount, so you can put it and a PC in one of those boxes where a device goes in the top of it and can be tilted up.)

      Increasing numbers of DJs are including a computer of some sort in their sound system so that they can use it to play loops, and to play compressed audio files, which need not be lossy, and in any event which need not be as lossy as an mp3 to have useful levels of compression... and as a sampler.

      This device apparently provides some decent audio with an intuitive interface for control of the music, namely, the turntables. At $250 it might remain a toy for a few and fade from existence, but if they drop the price a bit I suspect they'll sell a bunch of them. (Also, the toy factor will probably sell a bunch of them to geeks and kids with too much money who visit their local supermarket of electronics, such as fry's.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Yeah right by lungofish · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think they're trying to sell it to professional DJs.

      If they were, it would cost $2500 instead of $250. They'd also be selling it through specialty stores that are only open on Tuesdays between 12:30 pm and 3:53 pm, and are staffed by surly lesbians.

      I think they're targeting the tinkerers and the wedding DJ types, the kinds of people that buy those Newmark "DJ in a box" setups and mixers from Radio Shack.

    4. Re:Yeah right by ewwhite · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Final Scratch or a Denon or Pioneer DJ-oriented CD deck would be much better additions to a traditional setup than this toy. Again, this particular product is an example of how corporations are capitalizing on the popularity of DJ culture. It's a shame because it's flooding the market with less-talented, less-experienced DJs.....

      The real stuff....

      --
      Edmund White
      http://flickr.com/ewwhite
    5. Re:Yeah right by kidlinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wtf makes you think a DJ using Technics is the target audience? Obviously no one is gonna bail on their 1200s, but this might be an interesting toy for a skilled DJ. I remember hearing a story from my buddy about a DJ who was mixin up a storm with a fisher price record player and some 45s. Like anything else, it's all about what you can do with a given tool.

      Anyway, I think they're targeting somone like myself, who's very interested in mixing, but has neither the time nor the money to get a full blown system and stacks of vinyl.

      This product looks very interesting, and I have some friends who I know would be interested in it too, for the same reasons I am. That is, money, time, and skill level (which doesn't warrant a set of Technics.)

      I think it's pretty cool, because my buddies and I could mix some mp3s on our computers, and share 'em with each other. Sounds like a lot of fun to me, and the price is right.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    6. Re:Yeah right by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps I should have been a little more specific: the real DJs who wish to spin stuff from a computer will use Final Scratch.

      Also, FYI Final Scratch does support lossless formats. In fact the newest version uses NI Traktor as its front end.

      A certain amount of kudos is due to Stanton here, because the intel version is Linux, and there is no Windows version. Version 1.1 adds OS X support too.

      Finally if you check the web site you'll see that there are two different records available for it - one optimized for scratching and the other for mixing. But I will admit I'm by no means an expert DJ.

      I agree with you however, that Final Scratch will not replace genuine pressed records. But for the DJ who also creates music, Final Scratch is an invaluable tool to bring that cool groove you put together to a gig the same evening.

    7. Re:Yeah right by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Professional DJs don't buy music.
      Never have.
      They get promos from Record Pools.


      Shitty DJs don't buy music. If you're only playing promos, you're a fucking tool.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  2. Not bad... but will it multitrack? by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A six channel, 24 bit USB audio interface for under $250 is not bad at all... Forget the pads, it might actually make a nice audio interface for home musicians. I wonder how well it works with the popular multitrack software such as Cakewalk, Cubase, etc...

    1. Re:Not bad... but will it multitrack? by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well you'd think that 6 channels at 24 bit sounds good for under $250, but think about it -- a cheezy old SoundBlaster and a previous-generation multi-thousand dollar Apogee or ProTools rig are all based on 16-bit technology... but merely because this is so does not mean they will sound the same.

      You get what you pay for. Be very careful when trying to define sound quality with bits and sampling rates alone. There are a lot more variables than that when it comes to digital audio hardware, many of them purely subjective.

    2. Re:Not bad... but will it multitrack? by back_pages · · Score: 2, Informative
      With the KX project audio drivers, it's possible to use multiple Soundblaster Live! cards in one machine. I'm running two at the moment, providing me with the ability to record four stereo digital inputs simultaneously. Each additional card provides another two inputs.

      The Soundfont capability of the Live! cards is also an incredible feature on a budget. I have over 1000 patches available from my cheap USB midi controller ($150) in real time, right now, just push the button. That's 600 megs of audio samples and I still have room for 15,000 patches in my current setup.

      The midi device is limited in polyphony, which is why I have more than one card. I route patches with high numbers of voices to the card with KX project drivers and the limitation is just a memory.

      You can link multiple Live! cards via the digital IO pins that are present on nearly every model. This synchronizes the clocks and you eliminate the problem of time-drift when running a sequence.

      Now, no need to remind me that none of this would make the grade at a professional level. I know there are bigger and better things out there. For the price, though, the amateur/home/hobby musician cannot do better than a couple of SB Live cards. My total investment has been $150 for a basic midi controller plus the cost of Cakewalk ($299 or Kazaa discount.) Everything else (Megafont, KX drivers, SB drivers, donated soundcards, public domain samples and soundfonts) has been completely free.

      So don't rip on the Soundblasters. They are not profesional, but dollar for dollar, you really can't do any better.

    3. Re:Not bad... but will it multitrack? by back_pages · · Score: 2, Informative
      You definitely need to record with the mic preamp turned off. All that misfeature does is introduce a lot of static. Other than that, your SB Live will record with a reasonably high level of fidelity whatever you manage to feed it - you can use the 1/8" in jacks (some models have gold plated jacks), you can use the 1/8" SPDIF if you have some other digital interface, or you can plug directly into the pins on the card.

      That said, if you have a good mic (as good as you can with an 1/8" input) and turn off the +20 dB mic preamp, you should be getting reasonable sounding takes. The next improvement you could make would be to use a separate mixing board or preamp that allows you to condition the sound before sending it to the soundcard. Boosting the lows, etc., will usually help a cheap mic sound better before it hits the soundcard.

      I actually direct-line my electric guitar sometimes with a 1/4-1/8" mono adapter and get some great sounds. Granted you have to at least some reverb and preferably an amp simulator before it sounds like a "live" electric guitar, but it certainly is not impossible to get good sounding recording with a Soundblaster.

      And I do mean "good", not "professional".

      KX Project has alternate drivers for the SB Live! that focus on recording audio and using multiple soundcards simultaneously. More info on this site than I can digest.

      Hammer Sound is no longer updated, but has a moderate collection of free soundfonts so your midi stuff will sound like Dr. Dre instead of some AOL user's homepage.

      Audio Forums is, to the best of my experience, the place to go when you want answers from people who know for sure. This is definitely the place to ask for tips on getting the best quality recording out of your SB Live.

  3. Nope by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are n't going to do that, but a hell of a lot of DJ Wannabes' would and that's a much larger market than professional DJ's.

  4. Herculus Graphics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Flight simulator on an 8086... If you flew the plane over 65536 feet, you'd come up through the ground again.

  5. Even better product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nothing surpasses the true sound of analog vinyl ! Get the best of both worlds with final scrach http://www.finalscratch.com

    This package includes digitally encoded vinyl that sends the signal to your laptop running Linux/Mac OS, and synchronizes your mp3 with the vinyl. It then sends it back into the mixer for mixing.

    Coolest toy I have played with in awhile, and it still keeps my sound clean and bad ass playing thru any pair of technic 1200's

    1. Re:Even better product by ewwhite · · Score: 2, Informative
      I actually get annoyed when I mix with DJs that use Final Scratch. While it's a good idea and well-executed, it's a hassle for the traveling/gigging DJ. Here in the Chicago scene, it's difficult to obtain access to AC power (for your laptop) and inputs into the mixer for the Final Scratch USB unit. Most of these clubs are permanent installations, and this becomes an issue when you have several DJs in the lineup for the night.

      I own a Denon DN-S5000 CD unit in addition to my Technics. That's a way to incorporate new technology into your sets. Final Scratch is nice, but doesn't offer the flexibility that a Pioneer or Denon CD deck would allow.

      Check out the mixes....

      --
      Edmund White
      http://flickr.com/ewwhite
  6. Huh ? by phoxix · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When did americans become obsessed with this idea that a DJ's sole job is to scratch records ? No wonder our DJ's are pretty much crap.

    Most of the big name DJ's I've seen rarely if ever bother to scratch. These DJ's are not concerned with such, instead they are concerned with creating a smooth flowing stream of music by engaging in the arts such as beat mixing, volume matching, etc.

    I suggest looking on kazaa/usenet/etc for videos of any of the following DJ's in action, and one will easily see they are nothing like the american stereotype DJ. (Paul Oakenfold, Sasha, Timo Mass, Paul Van Dyk, etc)

    Sunny Dubey

    PS: I'm not saying all american DJ's are crap. We've got some good ones like Sandra Collins, Mark Farina, Danny Tenaglia, and such.

  7. Not even close by nystul555 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't even close to being what a DJ (pro or amature) would want. It's really more of a toy. Only now are we seeing CD tables - like the Pioneer DJM-1000 that are high enough quality to be considered worthy of using. 90% of DJs are still into vinyl. And before anyone says anything about how they are living in the past or whatever - there are several reasons for that. You still have greater control over vinyl - you can touch it and move it exactly how you want, other systems have to simulate that. Also, ALMOST ALL GOOD DANCE MUSIC COMES OUT ON VINYL ONLY!! Go to www.dancerecords.com or www.satelliterecords.com, and see exactly how many tracks are available on anything other than vinyl. Yeah, if you are spinning Top 40 right off the cd you got at BestBuy, or in this case the MP3 you downloaded from iTunes or wherever, and you aren't trying to do anything advanced, then maybe something like this could be a fun diversion. But if you are trying to mix interesting, unique music you are still going to use vinyl. But again, this just doesnt have anywhere NEAR the functionality that a DJ would want. They would be better off to buy two cheap tables and a cheap mixer off of ebay than to try to use this thing. And yes, even amatures usually have 2 1200s and a stack of vinyl.

  8. Not to sound stupid, but by Gregoyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They don't do Mac?!?!?

    They really aren't going to be taken seriously in the DJ world until the release a product that is compatible with Macintosh laptops. I don't know a single DJ who uses a laptop running anything besides MacOS.

    I know Mac OS X has trouble with 5.1 sound, but I would think you could get it without too much work by bypassing the normal soundcard. Hell, if it worked well enough DJs would use it instead of their soundcard for digital output. Plus if they had a Mac version they could do away with USB and the audio compression that is necessary to use that transfer method and go straight to firewire.

    --

    "He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil."

    1. Re:Not to sound stupid, but by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only thing that sounds "stupid" is the suggestion that Mac OS X has a problem with 5.1 surround sound! Since 10.1, the underlying "Core Audio" architecture has had no problem with far more channels than that.

      Um.... don't worry too much anyway Gregoyle, I don't really think this product is aimed at people who want "to be taken seriously in the DJ world". Could you imagine, really, getting up in front of over 200 people with that silly looking thing? Don't worry. You can always run Traktor on a Mac, and if you really want to do some cool shit, grab Final Scratch.

  9. Re:Yep. by Rai · · Score: 3, Informative

    and it's unneccessarily difficult

    Vinyl is much, much easier to work with that CDs or any other type of digital format. On a record, you can see the changes in the track by the variations in the groove pattern. This makes it easier to find your cue point and know when the breakdowns and other changes are coming up. It also makes beatmatching and cueing easier as you can manipulate the actual movement of the record and not just a 'play' button and some stationary jog wheel (though there are CD players that try to emulate the rotation of a record.)

    The only digital media that seems to come close to vinyl is Staton's Final Scratch which I have yet to try.

  10. Latency? WTF? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "To keep things honest, and unbiased, the DJ Console does have one minor flaw, there is a bit of latency between button push, and software response. Though, this is somewhat expected due to the Consoles USB 1.1 connection to the computer. The resident HH DJ (yours truly), was having a few issues timing his beat matching/scratch/etc due to being accustom to the instantaneous response of actual DJ Equipment and traditional turn-table. All in all, we did learn to compensate for the delay in response and we were back to having fun with the equipment in short time. One question can only be raised here however, as to why a USB 2.0 interface was not implemented during the design process of this console.

    Heh, a musical instrument with a latency issue. Oh yes, sure, Pros are going to stock up on these things. Not bloody likely.

    Anyway, how's this news? There's like a hundred gimmicy little audio things you can hook up to your PC. Is tomorrow's headline going to be about one of those electronic midi guitars with the plastic strings? I can see the headline now "Yamaha introduces new electronic guitar, Jimmy Page surrenders".. Wait a sec, that's a Fark headline! It's a trap! NSFW!

    USB 1.1 on that thing reduces it from a toy to trash, IMO.

    "Boo" to the guy who wrote the article, as well. There were no performance benchmarks to demonstrate whether the card impacts frame rates when compared to other audio solutions. That's what I looked at when I bought my last card, I didn't want to go to the trouble of over-clocking my system just to have the wrong accessories eat up whatever FPS gains I picked up.

    Final thought on this review:

    Moving on to the next series of tests we listened to a various mixture of high bitrate Mp3's ( > 192kps) and audio CD's that spanned various spectrums of musical styles. Initial we tossed in Crystal Method's Tweekend CD due to its great sound range.

    WTF? Crystal Method's music has no sound staging or real depth to it. It's just a bunch of clicks and whistles for the raver kids. How about getting out something with real instruments and natural sounds next time, foo. Samples of resampled bits of music with a punchy bass sound ain't depth unless you are 14 and dream about having a car with a big stereo so you can be like the guys in The Fast and the Furious.. And get that glowstick pacifier thingy out of your mouth, dumbass.

    Peace out

  11. Uh, try the late 70's. by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a basic history of rap as I, a 30 year-old white guy, know it:

    Modern rap goes back to NYC in the late 70's. "Rapper's Delight" by the Sugar Hill Gang dates back to then. Also, around the same time, DJ Kool Herc was the first guy known to use two turntables to cut seamlessly back and forth between songs.

    Things picked up in the early to mid 80's, when we saw NYC-based acts like L.L. Cool J, Public Enemy, and Run-DMC. The Beastie Boys became the first white rappers to hit it big. Rap crossed over to young, white America (the MTV generation) mostly thanks to Run-DMC collaborating with Aerosmith on the remake of "Walk This Way" in 1986. Most pre-1988 rap was innocent (and mostly clean) braggadocio of the "I'm cooler than you [and here's why]" variety.

    In the late 80's and early 90's, gangsta rap got big with acts like Ice-T, Eazy-E and N.W.A., and later Snoop Doggy Dogg, who were actually gang members/criminals, whose violent lyrics raised the ire of older whitebread America. It was around this time that the whole east coast rapper vs. west coast rapper war broke out. At the same time, Vanilla Ice gave white rappers a bad name.

    Around 1994 I felt that most new rap that was coming out was shit, so it is at this point that my history gets sketchy. In the late 90's there was essentially a cavalcade of mush-mouthed, lowlife bastards like Notorious B.I.G., DMX, Ja Rule, 50-Cent, Busta Rhymes, etc, whose already-incoherent words were further drowned out by overly-thunderous bass. Oh, and Tupac, who became quite prolific and released more albums after he was dead than he did while alive. Videos became nothing but pissing contests to see who could squeeze the most whorish-looking women and the most garish Cadillac Escalades into a few minutes of video. The music became secondary because every fucking rapper on the planet was too busy trying to do movies. It was also around this time that we got the highly-annoying Eminem. Oh, and let's not forget shitty rap-rock acts like Kid Rock, Limp Bizkit, etc. Yuck.

    My iPod has about 400 rap/hip-hop songs on it, and very damn few of them are dated after 1995-- but I still listen to and enjoy almost everything that came before.

  12. Any DJs actually comment yet? by patrick24601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am curious... anybody that has said "90% of all DJs" and "No DJ will..". How many of you are actually paid worknig mobile disc jockeys? I am. The group I work has 6 shows. And all 6 of them are CD ONLY - No Vinyl. Every DJ I know went to CD and got away from Vinyl as soon as possible. The weight alone is the major benefit, not to mention countless others. Scratching? I don't know of any PAID DJ that still does it, and I have never had a client that said "please scratch" at any paying gig. I am sure that there are some parties that might want it. But not from a mainstream mobile disc jockey show. FYI... I am the first DJ in our group to take the entire CD setup and RIP it to MP3. I am now experimenting with PC DJ and DSS to see how good I can get beat mixing with MP3s only. I have found I can do it with just a basic PC and soundcard, and the sound quality is great. Remember: Most paying clients don't want scratching or the highest quality sounds. They want their requests to be played and the DJ to show up on time and keep the crowd entertained. Most of them don't even care if you beat mix or not.

    --
    "Action is the thing that escapes most people. Great ideas are a dime a dozen. Great actions are few and far in between.
  13. Re:Yes! by cdf12345 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the post I'm guessing you do events like weddings and such, I think there's a big difference between event DJ's and club/rave djs

    they are completely different and need different hardware, regular djs never need to beatmatch or change pitch,

    whereas club djs have to have complete control of the sound, that's why final scratch is amazing, and this hardware will be passed off as lame.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  14. stupid stupid stupid and silly too by seabasstin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe it's just me but; isn't this product all wrong.

    Problem #1 PC only.
    At a time when Mac OSX and Linux have some of the lowest audio Latencies in the industry; and when there is so much more exitement on those platforms what is this company thinking making standard based hardware not platform independent?

    Problem #2
    Why USB and No Firewire (ieee1394).
    Newsflasch Hercules, the industry trend for MP3 music is.... iPod and iTunes, mac or pc.
    You can't make a new DJ product that can't control an iPod.
    That is just suicide.
    All it would take for this product to be forgotten, is someone else to intro a firewire based controler that can connect to one or 2 iPods.
    This would be the true killer application.
    You have to ride on market successes.
    Nothing like this works in a Vacuum.
    I saw this on slashdot and I was so excited until I realized what it was. so so oh hum.

    Problem #3.
    DJ software What *%@#$!!!
    Why does it need to connect to DJ software.
    It should manage on it's own.
    This needs to be able to access and control MP3s and manipulate them the way that a mixer controls sound out of turntables.
    Have 2 or more sound sources (MP3s) cue them, play/pause them, pitch shift them, beat match, etc, From the console.
    use a simple interface to load all MP3s from whatever platform or external drive, and allow the console to do it's work internally. not in the host cpu.
    (this would enable it to control iPods and a bunch of other sound sources.)

    hugh....

    More poor planing and design.
    Typical of Vacuum designed products.
    Get with it.

    --
    Content + Container; Content = Container; Content â Container... which is the question?