Slashdot Mirror


Voyager 1 Reaches Interstellar Space

letxa2000 writes "CNN is reporting that Voyager 1, now some 8.4 billion miles (90 AUs) from the sun, has left the solar system and entered interstellar space by reaching the heliopause. However, whether the probe has reached the heliopause or is just coming close is the subject of two papers to be published in Thursday's Nature Magazine. The probe supposedly has enough nuclear fuel to last until 2020. Will it be able to find anything interesting outside the solar system in the next 17 years?"

93 of 565 comments (clear)

  1. Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by KFury · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you guys have any idea how much RAM had to be added to the Matrix to extend the simulation out that far?!

    1. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

      A sparse matrix takes up a lot less memory.

    2. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not much really. Neither the probe nor the space it "travels through" actually required any simulation at all. We only needed to simulate the probe's signal back to earth, and the data it "generated", which was merely made up from preconceived expecations, anyway. The humans were happy, and all is right with the world.

    3. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by calethix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come on now, let's all try to keep our movie jokes in this thread related to ST:TMP. ;)

    4. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Do you guys have any idea how much RAM had to be added to the Matrix to extend the simulation out that far?!"

      The machines just wanted to show off their new Matrix FX card.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh man for a second I thought you said the Tooth Fairy didn't exist, I was scared for a second...

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    6. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by KFury · · Score: 5, Funny

      "A sparse matrix takes up a lot less memory."

      A sparse matrix also makes a lot less money. Just ask theaters next week when the poor reviews outweigh the sequel buzz.

    7. Re:Agent Smith files for Chapter 11 by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A sparse matrix takes up a lot less memory.

      And that's the real reason why Schrodinger's cat is both alive and dead until you peek in the box - it saves space when nobody's looking anyway. And you thought quantum mechanics was complicated.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  2. to paraphrase by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will it be able to find anything interesting outside the solar system in the next 17 years?

    Short answer: No.

    Long Answer: "Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly hugely mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space... " -DNA

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:to paraphrase by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Detailed answer: Yes.

      Questions that can still be investigated by Voyager include a number of questions about the interaction between the solar wind, solar magnetic field, and interstellar medium, direct measurements of the interstellar magnetic field, the actual composition of interstellar gas, where exactly the heliopause lies, and how it's affected by changes in solar activity. I'm sure there are even more questions that I haven't thought of.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:to paraphrase by pclminion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Better answer: We really hope so!

      Voyager has been moving through space in ways unexplainable by physics. There is a small acceleration that can't be accounted for using known laws. It's almost like gravity doesn't work quite the way we think it does.

      Of course, there is always the possibility that we just can't see the source of the acceleration, and it'll turn out to be something simple. However so far, all proposals put forth to explain it have been shown to be incorrect.

      There is a deeper connection to very important issues in physics. For decades we have been studying the fabled "dark matter" which is supposed to be the cause of the anomalous rotation of the galaxy. The galaxy does not move in ways predicted by the laws of gravity. It is as if there is a huge amount of hidden mass which is influencing its rotation. So far we have not found any of this "dark matter."

      But imagine the possibility. What if dark matter doesn't really exist? What if it's our understanding of gravity that is wrong? This would have profound implications throughout physics. After all our only direct experience of gravity is what happens here on Earth and within the bounds of the solar system. Except that today, we have a probe that has crossed that limit.

      Perhaps the anomalous motion of Voyager will shed light on the situation. I for one would be utterly elated if it turns out we have to rewrite our physics books.

      Voyager isn't useless yet!

    3. Re:to paraphrase by cens0r · · Score: 2

      Actually it's pretty well understood that our theory of gravity is wrong. It doesn't agree with quantum mechanics. That's the big push in physics right now to find a 'quantum' theory of gravity, or identify the graviton particle.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    4. Re:to paraphrase by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, there's a difference between being correct and being accurate. Yes, clearly our current theory of gravity is not CORRECT because it doesn't play well with QM. However it is a very ACCURATE theory in the sense that it gives answers which match reality exceedingly well (unless you take things to the quantum scale).

      What we're talking about here is a new situation, where the current theories of gravity aren't giving the right numbers even at a macroscopic scale. That is, if there isn't some other hidden force that we can't observe.

      I would personally rather believe that our theories of gravity are wrong, as opposed to thinking the universe is magically permeated with huge amounts of massive stuff that we quite inconveniently cannot detect.

    5. Re:to paraphrase by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two reasons:

      1. Voyager is now mostly past the 'comets and stuff'.

      2. Getting useful information about space from telemetry means you have to track an object which you know the properties of. We know approximate mass for most comets. We know exact mass, composition, initial velocity, acceleration vectors and more about Voyager. This means we don't have to guess these in calculations, which means we get quite a bit more detailed info out of them.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    6. Re:to paraphrase by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it's my understanding that the Oort Cloud extends several thousand AU's outside the solar system. Those are the objects that come in for a pass near the sun ever million years or so... I'm not sure how far out they've been detected so far, but I'm pretty sure they're way out there.

    7. Re:to paraphrase by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only have one problem with the whole dyson sphere idea. Assuming you are trying to walk around inside it, what is going to keep you on the ground? Not gravity.
      One of the problems we had to deal with in my college physics courses was figuring out the effect of gravity on an object inside a shell, resultant from that shell. And you know the answer we came up with? Zero, Zilch, the gravity from the shell counteracts itself no matter where you are in the shell. Simply put, even though you are might be closer to one spot on the shell, the fact that most of the mass of the shell is now on the other side of you, cancels out the effect of the distance.
      Here is a reference, for those that don't trust me.
      So my point is, why would anyone build a dyson sphere in the first place, unless its just a collector and the people live elsewhere?

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    8. Re:to paraphrase by sbszine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could spin the shell for apparent gravity and live on the inside equator. There's a ton of lebensraum in a 1AU radius sphere.

      --

      Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

    9. Re:to paraphrase by Progman3K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to Wikipedia, you're right; Oort Clouds are postulated to extend 50,000-100,000 AU from their stars.

      That would effectively put Voyager outside the heliopause but still within Sol's Oort cloud.

      I like the end of the Wikipedia article:

      It is thought that other stars are likely to possess Oort clouds of their own, and that the outer edges of two nearby stars' Oort clouds may sometimes overlap, causing the occasional intrusion of a comet into the inner solar system.

      The reason I find this significant is that I remember hearing that it is believed some comets might be the ferriers of organic material, life even, from other stars and solar systems, and they may even be what seeded life here, in this solar system.

      So I hope they scrubbed down Voyager properly before launching it, otherwise countless years from now, it could crash-land on a planet somewhere and the microbes it is carrying (if they survived the trip) might

      - Have no effect
      - Seed life on a world
      - Cause a plague that kills all indiginous life on another planet because their immune systems are unable to cope with the microbes.

      Which do you think will happen?
      I'm taking bets.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    10. Re:to paraphrase by jpkeating · · Score: 2, Informative

      for more, see Discover on tweaking the theory of gravity, and Sky & Telescope on evidence against it.

    11. Re:to paraphrase by KjetilK · · Score: 2, Informative

      Voyager has been moving through space in ways unexplainable by physics.

      Any references I can read? astro-ph will do fine... :-)

      So far we have not found any of this "dark matter."

      Oh yes, there are many detections of massive astrophysical compact halo objects in our galaxy, P. Popowski et al, and there is also a lot of work going on to use the same ideas to look for similar bodies in other galaxies. In fact, the microlensing ideas were first proposed for extragalactic studies by Chang and Refsdal in an article in Nature in 1979. The funny thing about this is that it doesn't matter what kind of matter it is, as long as it is gravitating. Also, it is easier if it is clumped, but it doesn't need to be.

      Shameless plug: My thesis: Gravitational Microlensing of Quasar Clouds: Detectability in a Worst-Case Scenario.

      I for one would be utterly elated if it turns out we have to rewrite our physics books.

      Would be cool! :-)

      Voyager isn't useless yet!

      That's true! Just venturing off into the unknown is really interesting. I'd love to go there myself... :-)
      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  3. Goodness... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    They've gone to plaid.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Goodness... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Offtopic? Who the hell modded that off topic??? - Gone to plaid is a reference to ludricous speed taken from spaceballs."

      I'm surrounded by assholes!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. Heliopause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Heliopause
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

    The heliopause is the boundary where our Sun's solar wind is stopped by the interstellar medium.

    The solar wind blows a "bubble" in the interstellar medium (the rareified hydrogen and helium gas that permeates the galaxy). The point where the solar wind's strength is no longer great enough to push back the interstellar medium is known as the heliopause, and is often considered to be the outer "border" of the solar system.

    The distance to the heliopause is not precisely known. It is probably much smaller on the side of the solar system facing the orbital motion through the galaxy. It may also vary depending on the current velocity of the solar wind and the local density of the interstellar medium. It is known to lie far outside the orbit of Pluto. The current mission of the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft is to find and study the heliopause.

    An alternative definition is that the heliopause is the magnetopause between the solar system's magnetosphere and the galaxy's plasma currents.

    1. Re:Heliopause by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is slashdot. Nobody clicks on the links in the story.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  5. So I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it isn't going to reach the delta quadrant anytime soon?

  6. Of course we know what it will find by sielwolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aliens too stupid to wipe off some space dirt to realize the dang thing isn't named VEEEGERRRR!

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:Of course we know what it will find by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How did it get so fucking dusty in the vaccuum of space in the first place?

      The whole thing sounds made up.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  7. Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by yndrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's the range of communications for the probe? When will we lose our connection (if we haven't already)?

    1. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's the range of communications for the probe? When will we lose our connection (if we haven't already)?

      No one knows for certain. A number of factors enter in, including the ability of Voyager to keep its antenna pointed at Earth, the amount of power left in the radiothermal generator, the size of radio telescope available for communicating with it on Earth, and possibly unknown effects from the heliopause.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by leerpm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, the US government has a secret message it uses to identify this point:

      "Can you hear me now? .. Can you hear me now?"

    3. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by N7DR · · Score: 5, Informative
      What's the range of communications for the probe? When will we lose our connection (if we haven't already)?

      For many years I was a co-investigator on Voyager (actually, technically, I suppose that I still am; I have never been notified that the status ever changed). Anyway, the best guess when I was an active participant, throughout the 80s and half of the 90s, was more-or-less the year 2010. That was predicted to be the year at which the always-decreasing power output from the transmitter, the ever-increasing distance and the more-or-less constant sensitivity of the DSN (Deep Space Network) system combined to reduce the received signal to the point where it the bit rate at which information could be extracted was too low to be useful.

      The general supposition was that funding would be eliminated before that date.

    4. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suppose if they felt they were still getting useful information from the probe (ie, it was "looking" at something "interesting" with sensors that still worked), they could always launch a relay-type satellite... just like a network repeater.

      Good thing they have several years to decide both if they:
      A) want to have/fund such a thing
      B) are getting new information worth collecting

      Heck... who knows where our terrestrial (or even space-stationed) receiver technology will be in 5 years; perhaps we'll be able to pick out the signal from here, no matter how weak nor how noisy.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
    5. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you cant launch a relay satellite. Remember, the falloff is r^2. Even the best engines would take about 10 years to place a satellite halfway between voyager and earth.
      that would be 2015 or so. Now the energy density at the point of the satellite would be 4 times as high as on earth, BUT there is no way you can stuff a reviever on a satellite who as 5% of the sensitivity of a earth based reciever. Remember, on earth you could use 300m at arichbo. For 4 times the signal power, you would still need a 150m dish to get the same signal strenght.
      And there is no way to get something like that in position.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 2, Funny

      ping -t voyager Duh!

    7. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First of all, the primary issue with the signal falloff is the SIZE of the reciever. Launching a sattellite doesn't exactly solve that problem, because the sattelite's reciever would have to be *nearly* as large as the VLA or the big "lake sized" earth-bound dishes.

      I think it has more to do with the sheer size, than the sensitivity of the reciever. The "noise" from the Universe will eventually eat the signal and with the combination of decreasing power and increasing distance, I think xmit power will fall off faster than some "technology" (new filters, transforms, etc etc)

      Squirrel

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    8. Re:Even if it does, will it be able to tell us? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Funny

      >When will we lose our connection (if we haven't already)?

      Its good until 2005 when the FCC Broadcast Flag rule makes recieving the signal illegal without a DRM upgrade.

  8. communicating? by wankledot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if it does find anything, how long before it's out of earshot for us? Are we able to hear from it up until that last bit of fuel is spent?

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    1. Re:communicating? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Informative

      The fuel is for communicating, not for moving.

      There's no friction in space. It can travel forever in its current direction. When the fuel runs out in 2020, we won't be able to hear from it.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:communicating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's no friction in space.

      Oh, yeah? _You_ try sharing a battered smuggler ship with a flea-bitten wookie, a hillbilly brother/sister couple, an Alzheimer's patient with a light saber, and two gay robots.

  9. Re:26 years.... by DJTodd242 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can only hope some day we catch up to Voyager. Either with a probe that could pass it up, or NCC-1701 :-)

    More likely it'll be blown to smithereens by Klingons.

  10. Heliopause by mongoks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Voyager 1 has reached heliopause and is now experiencing hot flashes and irritability. Hormone replacement therapy has proven innefective thus far.

  11. Re:you never know... by Polly_was_a_cracker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it the same sound as one hand clapping?

    --
    I have a Cig, but do you have a light?
  12. Fuel running out by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is this fuel used for? Just for communicating, or does it still need acceleration? If it's just for communication, couldn't they make it last longer by increasing the intervals between each time it communicates?

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Fuel running out by BengalsUF · · Score: 5, Informative

      Voyager uses a radioisotope thermoelectric generator for its power. This means that radioactive decay of its fuel creates heat, which is used to create power. That fuel's going to decay no matter what, so you either use the power or lose it.

    2. Re:Fuel running out by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is this fuel used for? Just for communicating, or does it still need acceleration? If it's just for communication, couldn't they make it last longer by increasing the intervals between each time it communicates?

      I believe they are talking about the nuclear battery that's onboard to power it's 20watt transmitter. Near as I remember the decay of plutonium causes heat which keeps the craft warm and operational, and is used to generate power. Given that this was launched in 1978, this is a major accompishment.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  13. The Heliosphere by UrgleHoth · · Score: 4, Informative

    NASA's page on the heliosphere

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  14. 12.5 Hours by johnos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's how long it takes a signal to reach us from the probe. When you consider the galaxy is 100,000 light years across, 8.4 billion miles is nothing.

    1. Re:12.5 Hours by CKW · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I love visualizing these things (all numbers approximate, I haven't pulled out the calculator.):

      if the galaxy was 100 KM wide,

      within 20 meters in any direction sun would be approximately 20 other stars,

      the nearest star would be 3-4 meters away,

      the probe would be 1.5 mm away.

      .

    2. Re:12.5 Hours by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget the Yankee Stadium analogy: The sun is on home plate, the first 4 planets are between home and the pitcher's mound, Jupiter is on second base, Saturn and Uranus are in the outfield, Pluto is in the parking lot, and Centauri is in San Franciso.

    3. Re:12.5 Hours by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Pluto is in the parking lot,

      I hope someone at least left the window rolled down for him.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  15. The mind boggling nature... by downix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    of how scientists do not take the next big leap. What frightens me the most is that we have not sent more probes after Voyager.

    Coming up is a planetary alignment that would allow a route to Tau Ceti, one of the reasonably nearby stars that could have an inhabitable planet. Using modern high-velocity nuclear engines, a probe could be engineered to reach it in 100 years, roughly. And a craft could be engineered to actually survive the travel *and* send back useful data.

    I want to see interstellar probes, engineered to travel to the nearest (12ly or less) stars and explore them.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:The mind boggling nature... by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny thing about large timeframes and technology -- if you wait long enough you will actually be further ahead.

      Exploring this solar system with experimental high-velocity nuclear engines is appropriate. But in 20 years we could probably send something to the nearest stars in 50 years. In 40 years perhaps it will only take 25 to travel -- thus we should wait 40 years before launching to arrive first :)

      --
      Rod Taylor
  16. Re:you never know... by Major_Small · · Score: 3, Informative

    actually, kinda... it's the sound of a deep bass, which the human ear can't hear... they found out because they noticed it shifted planets and stars along it's wave... check it out here: space.com

  17. Isn't it obvious? by leerpm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Voyager will find the long lost Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Rumsfeld will use this as an excuse to overhaul the space program! We all know the Iraqis have had a secret space program since 1950.

  18. Voyager ~12 Light Hours away by _Sambo · · Score: 4, Informative

    90 AUs (Distance from the Sun to the Earth)
    *
    8 minutes (Time it takes light to reach Earth from the Sun)
    =
    720 Light Minutes
    /
    60
    =
    12 Light Hours.

    We're quite a ways away from the Light Year.

  19. Voyager's Last Message: by tjstork · · Score: 3, Funny


    says: "Doh, Stupid comet!"

    20 years from now, against all odds, the comet bashed ever so slightly by our irresponsibly launched space probe slams into Yellowstone super volcano.

    That little probe has to be stopped before it bumps into something! Send someone out to get it before it's too late!

    --
    This is my sig.
  20. How long before we catch up with it ? by Jesrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if we'll ever see space technology advance enough so that, one day, we might be able to send a spacecraft past Voyager. Maybe we'll have some form of near-light-speed travel, or even faster-than-light travel, and manage to reach other stellar systems before Voyager does ?

    In any case, I'll be more than satisfied if we establish a colony on Mars, tag me a conservative if you will, but I don't feel like leaving good old Sol just yet.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  21. Money isn't the problem by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure why I'm bothering to respond to this obvious troll, but here goes...

    We already have enough resources to take care of all the needy people not only in this country but on this planet. The real problem is that society, as a whole, just doesn't care enough about the unfortunates enough to do anything. If we were to stop sending any money on space exploration, that money would not get immediately diverted to persons in need. It would most likely end up funding tax breaks so that people can buy a new SUV. Or maybe it would "disappear" in a S&L fraud or HUD "misappropriation".

    I grow tired of hearing people complaining that we should divert money from science towards needed social programs. Those programs are underfunded because we just haven't made them a priority. Slashing someone else's budget isn't going to make that money magically appear in the budget of social programs. We would need a real fundamental change in attitudes of elected officials and the voting public.

    GMD

    1. Re:Money isn't the problem by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It has nothing to do with "not caring".

      Many, many homeless simply cannot be helped. The borderline mentally ill would have to be forced into homes - which would violate their rights under the constitution. Addicts would have to be forced into treatment, which again, barring the commission of a crime, would violate their rights.

      If you were homeless, and wanted help, it's out there. Noones going to build you a 200,000 home and hand you the keys, but if you need a mailing address, a shower and shave, a hot meal, and clean clothes to get yourself a job - you could do so.

      Did you know, however, that the average panhandler in NYC makes more than the average NYC police officer? "Homelessness" can be very lucrative. 45 k a year - tax free, and with very low overhead.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Money isn't the problem by migurski · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Did you know, however, that the average panhandler in NYC makes more than the average NYC police officer? "Homelessness" can be very lucrative. 45 k a year - tax free, and with very low overhead.

      Is this "average" also "typical"? I.e., what's the median and mode, and the stddev?

      Not trying to flame, just really curious where stats like this come from, how they're verified, and what the rest of the data look like.

    3. Re:Money isn't the problem by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The real problem is that society, as a whole, just doesn't care enough about the unfortunates enough to do anything."

      Funny, when I read this, a memory bubbled to the surface. I was at a fast food joint one night. A homeless woman tapped my shoulder and asked for money to buy food. Thinking "hey, we're in a restaraunt, she'll actually use the money to buy food!" I gave her $5. She turned right around, wandered outside, and headed in the direction of a nearby shopping center complete with liquor store. The woman next to me in line was astonished. I wasn't terribly happy about that.

      Can't entirely blame society here. The whole 'teach a man to fish he can eat for a life time' story comes to mind. It's hard to buy a homeless guy a meal and let him go off to bum a meal off of somebody else the next day. I can give him my money, but what will he do to help himself?

      Society's not generally being cold hearted here. They are, however, closing themselves off from being taken advantage of. I don't have a solution to the homeless problem, but I'm reasonably confident that feeding them isn't the answer. They need to be made independent. Show me a way I can contribute to that, and I'm all ears.

      Don't assume people don't care. They do care. The problem is the solution isn't there.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Money isn't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't assume people don't care. They do care. The problem is the solution isn't there.

      Also, don't assume that people heading to a shopping center are after the liquor store, there may also be a grocer there selling something more cost-effective that the fast food joint and healtier too!

      OK, so maybe she was out for a quick fix but after such a kind gesture, why not give here the benefit of the doubt too.

  22. Re:IANAM by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
    Try typing "8.4 billion miles in light years" into Google.

    Isn't that spiff? :-)

  23. To boldy go... by MoeMoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists have long theorized that a shock wave exists where the hot solar wind bumps up against the thin gas of the interstellar medium.

    Picard: To boldy go where no ma-, hang on Number 1, speed bump!

    Will: All hands embrace for impact...

    THUMP!

    Picard: Data, inform engineering that we need better suspension on this thing...

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  24. Re:26 years.... by pyros · · Score: 2, Funny

    don't you mean it will swallow up one of their war ships?

  25. thud by lecca · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The probe supposedly has enough nuclear fuel to last until 2020. Will it be able to find anything interesting outside the solar system in the next 17 years?"
    If it goes much further, I bet it hits the screen.
    --
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
  26. Oh please... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would "we the people" ever hear about it? Or would the find be a classified secret due to so-called national/international security risks and issues?

    It wouldn't matter whether it was classified or not. A secret that big would not stay a secret for long. There are leaks all the time. Christ, we've already managed to let the Chinese obtain detailed information about every nuclear weapon in our arsenal. I'm sure if we ever got a clear sign of extraterrestial intelligence, word would slip out in a matter of days. Some things are just way, way too important to expect that every single individual with access to that information would keep their trap shut.

    GMD

  27. Re:26 years.... by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes... kinda feeling old (I just turned 36) but I remember when Voyager was launched. It was emotional then, and its emotional now. Think: back then, 640k was a *lot*, and the standard logic was 7xxx series TTL chips. Dunno what CPU, but I doubt it was anything so advanced as a Z-80. Dunno what firmware either, if any - coulda been hardwired. Can't remember shit here.

    Now, if you ask me: That's a beautiful piece of engineering, that we're still getting some use from.

    It's already had some sensor damage, etc; the main question is how long the remaining sensors hold up, IMHO.

    *...sniff...*

    --
    C|N>K
  28. RTGs by HermesHuang · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked at JPL for the power group, so I can actually say something about this. All of the deep-space probes run on radiothermal generators. What this is basically a radioactive source surrounded by thermoelectric generators and alpha particle absorbers. Thus, both the thermal gradient established between the radioactive material and space (via heat pipes and radiators) and the alpha particles emitted by the radioactive material are able to generate power. There are two limitations on the lifetime of these generators - the lifetime of the radioactive isotope, and the durability of the thermoelectrics and alpha particle absorbers. I don't know too much about the particle absorbers, but I worked with the thermoelectrics, and there are durability runs of several years. However, Voyager is far older then any test we could ever do. My feeling in this is that barring high-heat conditions, the thermoelectrics should be able to last nearly indefinitely.

  29. Re:Warning, Spoiler! by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Funny

    They'll have to do it without Bones. He's dead, Jim!

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  30. Voyager 1 Reaches Interstellar Space by da3dAlus · · Score: 2, Funny

    First Broadcast: "My god, it's full of stars!"

    Maybe now we'll find out how accurate that Starfield Simulation screensaver really is!

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  31. A song comes to mind by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the band Warlord:

    "Through Pioneer 10 and Voyager 1
    We've launched our knowledge to other suns
    Aspiring and reaching for the highest of beings
    We've lost our search for the world's basic needs"

    I hope it does find something, or something finds it. Earth could use some good news.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  32. Easy but . . . Re:How long before we catch up...? by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... expensive.

    The Voyager probes weren't built for speed. They were coasters, zipping from gravity well to gravity well with just a few puffs from the steering jets now and then.

    If there were some pressing reason to catch up, we could do it, although it would be pricey due to the current high cost of getting things into orbit. You'd need to get something up there with a motor capable of adding substantial change in velocity. A big liquid fueled motor, or perhaps one of those new-fangled ion drives powered by a really big solar collector or a small reactor.

    This is one of those problems that will get easier with time, assuming even modest progress in space propulsion. If we ever get practical fusion drives (theoretical of Isp topping 100,000 seconds!) we could get out there in a couple of years.

    Stefan

    Stefan

  33. Speed of Sound in Space by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 3, Funny
    In space, the violent encounter slows the solar wind from supersonic velocity to subsonic speed, and causes a pileup of particles.

    Last time I checked the speed of sound in space was essentially zero...

    --
    Why?
    1. Re:Speed of Sound in Space by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sorry but this is a pet peeve of mine.

      Indeed, science can be distilled down to a set of little sound-bite facts that are easily repeatable. "There is no sound in space" is one of them. However what most people for some reason do not understand is that this is a SOUND BITE.

      It is far too common for Slashdot readers to immediately object to something because it clashes with their boiled down kiddy version of science.

      Here's some news for you: the space surrounding the sun is far from empty, in fact it is filled with atoms, electrons, and ionized gas. Its density is low enough that a human would not perceive it without an instrument. But sound can quite easily travel through gas, no matter how thin. Clearly the sound cannot travel any faster than the individual particles themselves are moving. Hence it is very easy to define the speed of sound in a gas.

      No, I'm not claiming to be a scientist or above anyone else in terms of scientific knowledge, but it really pisses me off when people's first reaction is to DOUBT THE SCIENTISTS. Sure, they can be wrong sometimes, but I think it would be respectful to go do a little research before claiming, as if you are some kind of expert, that they are wrong.

    2. Re:Speed of Sound in Space by pclminion · · Score: 4, Informative
      In a sparse gas where interparticle interactions are uncommon (they don't hit each other frequently), the speed of sound depends only on temperature and not density.

      (going from water to air is a speed increase, and I'm guessing its some function of density)

      That's backward, sound travels much faster through water than through air. It does relate to density but not directly. The quantities that influence the speed of sound are the temperature and something called "bulk modulus" which describes how the material density changes as the pressure changes. Temperature is more important at very low densities. At higher densities as in solids the bulk modulus is the primary factor.

  34. FYI: Voyager VI was V'Ger, not Voyager I by nubbie · · Score: 2, Informative
    V'Ger, from Star-Trek: The Motion Picture, was Voyager VI(6), not Voyager I.
    V'Ger arrives at Earth and signals its Creator. When there is no response, V'Ger blasts energy bolts at the planet in an attempt to rid it of all its carbon infestations. Forced to act, Kirk tells V'Ger he knows why the Creator has not answered. The Ilia-probe, interested by Kirk's remark, says it will cease its attack when Kirk explains. But Kirk replies he will answer to no one but V'Ger itself. With some trepidation, Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Decker are lead by the Ilia-probe outside the ship to the "brain" of V'Ger. At the center of the chamber, the Starfleet officers are surprised to discover that V'Ger is in reality a twentieth century Earth robot space probe. In fact, a mounted plaque looks as though it reads "Voyager VI."

    Read more...
    --
    'Go for the eyes, Boo, go for the eyes, aaarrrrrrrr!' -- Minsc
  35. What if.... by jgacad · · Score: 4, Funny
    the aliens that find voyager only have CD players? How will they play the record that strapped to the craft?

    --
    ...the right of the people to keep and arm bears shall not be infringed.
    1. Re:What if.... by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can always use the Digital Needle:
      http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~springer/

  36. Re:26 years.... by raodin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That was a different Voyager.

  37. Re:Meanwhile by pmz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why is it that we can brainwash the masses into thinking that it's okay for us to spend billions on space crap while ignoring the homeless people living in the streets and at the YMCA?

    You are very shortsighted. Funding technology research creates new solutions to age-old problems. One day, a technology will be invented that makes hunger obselete (as in the Star Trek future). This technology is only limited by will, means, and time.

    Simply giving the money to the poor solves nothing. So they can buy pizza for their kids tonight. Big deal. It does nothing towards their ability to get pizza tomorrow or the next day.

    This is why direct social programs are a waste of tax payers' money. They make the politicians feel good about themselves while saving them from having to think about real solutions that hit problems at their foundation. Socialized healthcare is an excellent example, where there are real government-caused problems that prevent the health care market from functioning, so the politicians take the easy road and create a socialized system that steals people's money against their will putting it into a bureaucracy that will kill more people than it helps.

  38. sonic means mean speed of particles by typical+geek · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, a supersonic velocity means the space probe is moving faster than the mean speed of the errant hydrogen atoms.

    Subsonic means it's moving slower than the mean speed of the atoms, and a wave can propagate ahead of it.

    In this case, the velocity of the particles from the sun slows down when they encounter interstellar particles.

  39. Re:to paraphrase in a little detail.. by abhisarda · · Score: 2, Informative


    from-JPL.NASA "The solar system does not end at the orbit of Pluto, the ninth planet. Nor does it end at the heliopause boundary, where the solar wind can no longer continue to expand outward against the interstellar wind. It extends over a thousand times farther out where a swarm of small cometary nuclei, termed Oort's Cloud, is barely held in orbit by the Sun's gravity, feeble at such a great distance. Voyager 1 passed above the orbit of Pluto in May 1988, and Voyager 2 will pass beneath Pluto's orbit in august 1990. But even at speeds of over 35,000 mph, it will take nearly 20,000 years for the Voyagers to reach the middle of the comet swarm, and possibly twice this long for them to pass the outer boundaries of cometary space. By this time, they will have traveled a distance of two light-years, equivalent to half of the distance to Proxima Centauri, the nearest star. "

  40. 17 years later.. by Cassanova · · Score: 3, Funny

    Voyager crash lands on this deep and remote planet..as each of its systems start to shutdown in turn, its external microphones pick up the voice of Charleston Heston, screaming in the distance "Take your paws off me you damn dirty ape!"....
    [muffled horse hooves pounding on the ground]
    Voyager 1 signing off. Goodbye earth...
    ;-)

  41. Heliopause vs. Termination Shock by seeks2know · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those interested in scientific accuracy, there is a little bit of misinformation in the statement:

    ...Voyager 1, now some 8.4 billion miles (90 AUs) from the sun, has left the solar system and entered interstellar space by reaching the heliopause.

    What scientists are speculating is that Voyager 1 has reached termination shock, which is the where the solar wind first meets interstellar plasma.

    Heliopause is the outer boundary of the solar wind. This Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD) from June 24, 2002 provides a nice graphically illustrated explanation of Heliopause and Terminal Shock.

    It will take a number of years more for Voyager 1 to reach heliopause. Voyager 1 is currently about 90 AUs away. Heliopause is speculated to exist at 110 to 150 AUs.

  42. Re:26 years.... by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Informative
  43. Scientists Unsure? by Macsimus · · Score: 2, Funny
    Couldn't they just turn a camera toward the heliopause border and look for the "Now Leaving the Sol System" sign ... you know, like these:

    National Park Service Entrance Signs

  44. Capitalism is the problem by David1982 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Homelessness and poverty will always exist under captialism. I am not saying that this is good or bad, I am saying that we do not live in the Star Trek utopian society in which there are jobs that pay enough for people to survive available for everyone.

    You might be able to teach someone to fish, but the but at some point the economy may not have any need for more fishermen (or whatever other job skill). All the unempolyed coders reading this can attest to this.

  45. Re:Before revising theories of gravity ... by pclminion · · Score: 4, Informative
    Don't I feel stupid.

    The spacecraft in question wasn't Voyager, but PIONEER 10. My point stands however, that having probes in the far reaches of space away from the solar system will be extremely valuable in the study of theories of gravity. Here's a link to a good place to start. A good Google search is "pioneer anomalous acceleration"

    Near the end of the article I linked, they explain that this effect is not observed with Voyager because of the way Voyager is stabilized by boosters (as opposed to spin-stabilization for Pioneer). If the effect is occurring with Voyager it is completely swamped by the booster accelerations. They also indicate that (obviously) the best way to continue studying this is to launch another probe outside of the solar system.

    If you spend any time researching this, you'll find groups of people all over the place who claim to have explained it. But none of them agree with each other. I think it's accurate to say that nobody REALLY knows what's happening.

  46. Riiiiight. by zCyl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Simple concept, drop a nuclear bomb behind a craft, and ride the shock wave forward. Needs a pushing plate, shock absorbers, etc of a good magnitude, but the system can and does work.

    Great idea. We'll build it, you get in the ship, and then after we detonate the bomb we'll design an atomic spatula to remove you from the rear end of the space ship.

    Without manipulation of gravity, the fastest humans can possibly accelerate is a few times the acceleration of Earth's gravity. And to get to decent speeds with that kind of acceleration takes a very long sustained force. You would need a giant spring lightyears long which could somehow magically not shred itself or melt under the kind of stress you're describing. You'd have better luck designing the spatula.

  47. Mysterious slow-down by bar-agent · · Score: 2

    What I'm really interested in finding out is: now that we have something that's reached or passed the heliopause, will the mysterious deceleration our probes have encountered cease?

    No one has any idea what is causing the slow-down. Dark matter? Interstellar anti-gravity? Who knows? It's...mysteeerious! Maybe it has something to do with the heliopause.

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  48. Long Term Perspective by nAsCz · · Score: 2

    Working at NASA a few years ago I saw an old painting of voyager's path through space over the next several million years. In that time it will pass close (relatively speaking) to more than a half a dozen stars. For a moment I was taken into this artist's imagination, and saw the vision of humanity setting out on a voyage far beyond all previous scope of space and time. I returned this year to where the painting had been and it was gone. Speaks a lot for the problems facing NASA from inside and out.

  49. The CNN Article Is Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Never trust the mainstream media to get a science story right!

    Voyager 1 *might* have reached the Termination Shock--NOT the heliopause. The termination shock is where the solar wind--electrically charged (ionized) hydrogen atoms blown off the surface of the sun--slows from 700,000-1.5 million miles per hour, down to under 250,000 mph. This indicates it's getting nearer to interstellar space because the solar wind is getting weaker, and it's having more trouble pushing against the interstellar winds of the galaxy. The termination shock lies somewhere between 80 and 100 AU. Between the termination shock and the heliopause (the true edge of the solar system), is the "heliosheath" region--kind of the Siberia of our solar system (distant, cold, dark). The heliopause lies around 120-150 AU.

    In effect, Voyager 1 may have reached the outtermost region of our solar system (which no craft has ever done before), but it still has 10-20 years to go to reach interstellar space. Here's NASA's press release. Note they say Voyager is about to reach the solar system's final frontier--not the edge of the solar system:

    http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2003/1105voyager .html