Slashdot Mirror


Better Displays With New Nanowire Film

Roland Piquepaille writes "A Harvard University team has successfully applied a film of nanowires on glass and plastic. This might lead to better and flexible displays or wearable computers, says the American Chemical Society, in "Nanowire film brings cheaper, faster electronics a step closer." "By using a 'bottom-up' approach pioneered by our group, which involves assembly of pre-formed nanoscale building blocks into functional devices, we can apply a film of nanowires to glass or plastics long after growth, and do so at room temperature," says Charles M. Lieber, professor of chemistry at Harvard. The researchers think that the first applications will be improved smart cards or LCD displays. But they also have a vision for the next decade. "One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around." This overview contains more details and references. It also includes a picture of a high-density crossbar nanostructure, whose geometry can serve as the basis for many applications, like bio-sensor arrays or high-density data storage."

127 comments

  1. On contacts? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can you actually focus on something which is that close to your eye?

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:On contacts? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't know about the technology, so I may be talking out of my arse, but I would think it's possible to have the nanowires "focus for you". They're going to be emitting light. If they can emit light in a specific direction, like a laser, then they'll be able to make sure the light hits the correct point on the photo-receptors in your eyeball.

      Now, obviously, if they can't have the light emitted go in a particular direction, then a different solution will have to be found...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:On contacts? by wtrmute · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps one can blur the image purposefully to make it seem farther away. One problem with wearable computers today is that they force their wearer to focus on something close with one eye while the other cannot focus on the same distance. This leads to a pretty headache after a while...

    3. Re:On contacts? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1, Funny

      There's an angle I hadn't thought of...

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    4. Re:On contacts? by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

      And the receiver would have to be really small.

      I call bullshit on this one.

      --
      Will code a sig generator for food
    5. Re:On contacts? by mustangsal66 · · Score: 1


      How long until the millitary gets a hold of this for contacts... Night vision contacts... zoom contacts....

      Will they be able to create images like a HUD? Process info from a recon bird, and display enemy locations on your contact lens, with distance, and position...

      Will the be hijackable?

      Ok strange trip down a detour

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    6. Re:On contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In SOVIET RUSSIA, wires focus YOU!

    7. Re:On contacts? by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you actually focus on something which is that close to your eye?

      Can you say repetitive eyeball stress syndrome?

      (Although popups on pron sites already cause this, most don't complain due to embarrassment)

    8. Re:On contacts? by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      It's possible, in the sense that you could create a lens that would create an effective focal length of a comfortable distance (like a camcorder viewfinder) so that content on the back face of the lens would be clear, but the lens geometry would probably have to be so large that you couldn't actually close your eyelid over it.

    9. Re:On contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather focus on how this can be used with OLED screens. This is a technology that could seriously oust CRTs and backlit LCDs from their thrones.

    10. Re:On contacts? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I should think they'll make them for given sizes of eyes, in several grades, with each light-emitting element pointing at the proper place in the eye.

      Note also that the lens does not have to have the whole computer in it, nor a power storage medium. It needs only to have enough of a computer to run the display, some sort of (hopefully secure) wireless networking, and an antenna to pick up power. Where you broadcast the power from is up to you but something with a relatively harmless frequency on your collar should do the trick nicely.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:On contacts? by Talinom · · Score: 1

      One problem with wearable computers today is that they force their wearer to focus on something close with one eye while the other cannot focus on the same distance. This leads to a pretty headache after a while...

      Bring this on! I have a really wacked prescription (+4.00 left eye and -1.00 right eye) and lack the parallax error needed one form of depth perception. This technology was practally built exclusively for me.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    12. Re:On contacts? by jeti · · Score: 1

      Why would the receiver have to be in the contacs themselves? The information could be transported on the liquid film covering your eyeballs.

    13. Re:On contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think one has to focus on the image. Since each contact lens provides an image to only a single eye, the two lens can show slightly different images such that the perceived "object" is far away. In this way, the eyes could focus on the far-away illusion.

  2. Just one word by heironymouscoward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Hype.

    Anything with 'nano' or 'cyber' in the name is hype. Yeah, we will see smaller cheaper electronics, but that's hardly news.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Just one word by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      The miniaturization isn't hype -- this is another step toward those (literally) scrolling displays.

      But as for the term, I must agree. This certainly isn't "nanotechnology". Nano has become what (shudder) "mega" was in the 80's.

    2. Re:Just one word by cbqwinner · · Score: 1

      You forgot 'extreme'. I guess to make it an even better product you drop the 'e' and just make it Xtreme.

      Xtreme cyber nano insert product here. sure to get lots of hype.

    3. Re:Just one word by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If nano has become mega, that's really going to fuck up scientific notation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Just one word by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      "Mega" still plagues us today. Last wednesday, I was watching a nice episode of Scrapheap Challenge. When the commercials came, suddenly I was bombarded by an extemely loud noise and the title, "Junkyard Mega Wars".

      *shudder*, *gasp*

  3. Useful by dwalsh · · Score: 5, Funny

    "One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around."

    So while you are walking around in the city, you get to see what it looks like. Hmm... Pity you can't do that now.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
    1. Re:Useful by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Thinking about it, this could be used for good, and for evil:

      Good: The contacts overlay useful captions where there currently isn't one, giving you street signs, direction signs, making it obvious from a distance where to get food, where the ATMs are, etc. Enter details of where you want to go, and the bus that'll take you there can be highlighted when it comes towards you.

      Bad: It's sold as that, but funded by advertising. Everywhere you look there's an ad for X10.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Useful by computechnica · · Score: 0

      Imagine the uses for Pr0n ;^) -8

    3. Re:Useful by metlin · · Score: 1

      Hey!

      If they would promise me that they would give me all those nifty voyeur ads of what I *could* see with an X10, hell why not ;-)

      Come on! Free soft pr0n when you're walking around the city is Not a Bad Thing (TM).

  4. walk around by termos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around.

    Considering we are geeks, going to a new city doesn't involve walking around, more like visiting conventions and getting the latest cool funny-phrase-sysadmin-tshirts.
    Take away the walking part mister, and you have yourself a deal.

    --
    Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
  5. Fault Tolerance? by supersmike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone notice what appears to be a broken nanowire towards the bottom left of the picture? I wonder what kind of fault-tolerance these sturctures have for that sort of thing.

    1. Re:Fault Tolerance? by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily broken, but definitely bent to hell...

    2. Re:Fault Tolerance? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Gotta wonder what that would feel like if it broke off and poked you in the eye.

      Can I get these things on my glasses instead of contact lenses? I don't appreciate small wires poking me in the eye.

  6. Contacts by maxdamage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long do you think it will take untill somone decides it would be funny to hijack someones vission and hack their contacts? It could be someone trying to be funny, just make the person think their seeing things... Or it could be someone trying to blind them... Just imagine waking up, putting on your contacts and being tourtured by avertisments, IN YOUR EYES. Thats a future that I am terrified of!

    1. Re:Contacts by zyridium · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What I am scared of is when the nasty ones from slashdot start smacking goatse or tubgirl on your eyes. And if they were contacts even closing your eyes might not help...Shudders

    2. Re:Contacts by October_30th · · Score: 1
      putting on your contacts and being tourtured by avertisments, IN YOUR EYES

      Just wait for the advertisements they're going to be beaming into your dreams.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    3. Re:Contacts by NoNine · · Score: 0

      and how is that different from now, again?

    4. Re:Contacts by eriksarcade · · Score: 1

      time to get out the tinfoil helmet!

    5. Re:Contacts by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why would you ever take them out? Except when you go to sleep, of course.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. my eyesight is bad enough as it is... by size1one · · Score: 2, Funny

    "One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them"

    my eyesight is bad enough as it is, the last thing I need are electronics short-circuiting in my eyeball.

    1. Re:my eyesight is bad enough as it is... by armando_wall · · Score: 1


      The Blue Sight Of Death!!!

  8. Invisibility? by cableshaft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might lead to better and flexible displays or wearable computers Could this be used to further "invisibility" research? For example, wear a suit of these displays and have a camera record a panoramic video around you and display the appropriate camera displays around the body?

    --
    Creator of the popular web game Proximity
    1. Re:Invisibility? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it has to take the viewing angle into account, so given that you can never really be usefully invisible to more than one or two people at a time, and their locations must be known. Still not useless, but not amazingly useful in most situations either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. How long before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The real question is how long until I can get some nice Adware to pop up on my contacts?

  10. Glasses for Zaphod Beebelbrox by madsen · · Score: 3, Funny

    The mention of the contatct lenses made me think of Zaphod Beebelbrox and his glasses (or was it someone else) that helped him to never be scared. The glasses went black when danger was imminent.

    That could be really cool when driving.

    1. Re:Glasses for Zaphod Beebelbrox by cablepokerface · · Score: 0

      You're thinking about the wrong guy ... Zaphod Beebelbrox would need 2 pair. ;-)

    2. Re:Glasses for Zaphod Beebelbrox by Ours · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a Ghost in the Shell: Stand alone complex. They kill a cop who knew to much by hacking his eyes and turning them off while he was driving on the highway.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
  11. Lovely! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    "One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around."

    Until the spamming starts!
    =Smidge=

  12. Contacts by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else but I certainly wouldn't stand for having to wear contacts when I don't need them simply to get "bonus material". Glasses, sure, but having watched people try to put in/manipulate/not drop the things it is certainly an activity I wouldn't want to participate in. YMMV though...

  13. Great idea by Ancil · · Score: 3, Funny
    One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around.
    One could imagine the decidedly non-virtual experience of getting creamed by a passing truck. Gives whole new meaning to Blue Screen of Death.
    1. Re:Great idea by cablepokerface · · Score: 0

      Good point, though if the driver of the truck would be wearing one, it would give a whole new meaning to Carmageddon. i.e. Pedestrians could be highlighted red in his eyesight.

    2. Re:Great idea by RocketSHE · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. Yes, it's bad enough people walk around with cell phones not paying attention to where they are going. Gripe. Gripe. I predict that 90% of the time Future-Dude walking around with the nano-contacts will be watching the football game and paying no attention to cars, trucks, manholes, etc.

      --
      ~==>RocketSHE
  14. Movies by pvt_medic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this contact thingy works out, think about the fun you could have with it. The ultimate in interactive experience since you only see what it lets you. You could have a personal movie theater with incredible resolution at yours hands... i mean eyes.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
    1. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The ultimate in interactive experience ... at yours hands"

      Yep, like pretty much all other advances in technology, this will be fantastic for pr0n ;-).

  15. One step closer to true VR... by Jetifi · · Score: 1

    Displays embedded in contact lenses would be orders of magnitude less clumsy than even lightweight VR helmets. At that scale they could probably be powered by eye motion (as some watches are powered by wrist motion), or you could embed miniature solar panels where the contact lense covers the iris, with the LCD just covering the pupil.

    1. Re:One step closer to true VR... by kryliss · · Score: 1

      The only problem would be when the pupil adjust sizes for different amounts of light. But still a very good idea... maybe just a portion of the iris... kinda give you a strange looking eye though.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  16. eye zooming by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I'd like to see is contacts that implement both a display and an ccd or the equivilant, so that we can zoom in on objects that are in the distance....would be so wicked.....imagine being able to use them like a microscope as well....would be good.

    --
    tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
    1. Re:eye zooming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It would probably be easier to use a clear polymer that can be shaped electrically. Create an adjustable lense to zoom in and out, rather than try to cram more electronics onto your eyeballs.

    2. Re:eye zooming by cablepokerface · · Score: 0

      Impossible. A optic improvement (like zooming) in a device is caused by 2 lenses moving further away from each other. Since the distance between the eye and lens is so small, only a digital zoom might be possible. Although using it as a microscope would mean however that we already can see i.e. cells with the naked eye but it is to small for our brain to filter it out. (Or is of too little importance).

    3. Re:eye zooming by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      OK the zooming is great for perving attractive young women but most of the rest of the time I require Peril-Sensitive and Monotony-Sensitive functionality so I just dont have to look at it.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    4. Re:eye zooming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      impossible? depends if you're trying to augment the eyes existing lense, or create a new one in front. sounds like you're thinking the latter, while the former would be easier - you'd simply be changing the shape of the lense (like with contacts).

    5. Re:eye zooming by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd think you'd be better off with a handheld unit or two that could communicate with whatever computer is operating the display(s). This has the added advantage of being able to go places your head cannot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. meanwhile, in Japan by Grummet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hi everybody.
    umm, gosh, don't know if i missed this news elsewhere in western media but last week on ABC (Asahi Broadcast Corp.) Japan there was a review of recent nanotechnology advances here in Japan and they reported that:
    1) A Yamagata University research team has managed to make flexible millimeter thick screens (roll up your TV and stick it in a tube, into your backback, pocket, whatever and away you go..!) ALREADY so I don't understand what the big deal is with these nanowires. Plus the Yamagata people figured out how to use a kind of "nano-dye" for multiple applications like:
    a) flexible thin solar cells (your tent is a battery charger!) or
    b) a blue "lens" to increase the data storage on those recently reknown expensive blue laser cd's that store gigs of date. (20 times more (?))

    Sorry for the lack of net based info but it looked pretty amazing - heck, I saw it on TV so come on,
    it must be bran' spankin' new!

    - Jeff -

    1. Re:meanwhile, in Japan by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      The problem is that that is all "micro" not "nano".

      The awfull truth of the matter is that there is NO nanotechnology in use or realistically close to use right now outside of catalysts and better paints.

      It is very popular now (especially in Japan... where this all started) to claim anything cool is nanotechnology. These wire meshes we're talking about here are many orders of magnitude smaller than your millermeter screen. It would be like saying we don't need skyscrapers, we already have two story houses.

      Now the Nanoletters article which is referenced is also a good deal of hype... ok, all hype.

      None of us (I'm in this field too) know what is going to happen or where it's going to be useful. If we already knew, we wouldn't be doing research, we'd be in production.

  18. if it works for the Terminator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this would be helpfull in bars at least..
    if these things could tell me a chick has VD, i mean

  19. When you see "wearable computers," you got hype by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    Seriously, for people who aren't soldiers are able-bodied, what is the point of wearable computers? This reminds me of the "toaster that's on the internet... for some reason" hype.

    1. Re:When you see "wearable computers," you got hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously, for people who aren't soldiers are able-bodied, what is the point of wearable computers?
      maybe to call the hospital when your wearable computer realizes you're having a heart attack. or to play MP3s, one or the other.
  20. Fiction by Alrescha · · Score: 2, Informative

    "One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around."

    Someone did imagine this sort of technology. I particularly like "Fast Times at Fairmont High" by Vernor Vinge for it's description of wearable computers/contacts use for visual 'enhancement'.

    A.

    --
    ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    1. Re:Fiction by Bazzargh · · Score: 1

      I can trump that 2001 short story with William Gibson's 1993 book "Virtual Light" (I'm sure by now someone else will have mentioned it on this thread), which invented the term "augmented reality" for this stuff (IIRC).

      Chevette Washington is a bicycle messenger turned pick-pocket who impulsively snatches a pair of innocent-looking sunglasses. But these are no ordinary shades. What you can see through these high-tech specs can make you rich--or get you killed.

      For those who haven't read it, the shades showed overlayed architectural diagrams on top of San Francisco -- not all that different from what these guys suggest.

  21. Combine it with this technology.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/13/ 0016221&mode=thread&tid=127&tid=146&tid=186&tid=99 and we'll really have something.

    Be able to manipulate the interface in your eye with only your mind.

  22. Optoelectronics in general by cerulean · · Score: 4, Informative

    Techniques to make thinner wires will probably be useful for improving the efficiency a whole range of optoelectronic devices:

    For LEDs, some light that might escape the device is reflected or absorbed by the tiny wires carrying the current into the junction. Thinner wires would mean an improvement (though perhaps small at this point) in the amount of light you get out of the device.

    With light going in the other direction, photovoltaics (solar panels) and various detectors are all about getting as much light into a junction as possible, so thinner wires would help make better devices here too.

    --
    -------------------- the list is long. dirac angestung gesept
  23. Fantastic by locarecords.com · · Score: 1
    ...

    This sounds like a fantastic new technology. Being able to shrink high resolution to a usable size for photo-realistic displays would be great. But I think the idea of contact-lense screens or glasses with inbuilt displays particularly exciting as it could/would revolutionise computers.

    Wearable computers are a much discussed idea but I feel that without a feedback display there are pretty useless. Now we have the possibility of it getting much closer...\

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
  24. sun-contacts by Hallow · · Score: 1

    I'd just be happy with contacts that could sense the amount of ambient light and adjust their opacity to compensate. UV protection would be good too.

  25. Re:Until... by fgb · · Score: 1

    Or, more nefariously, if you want to get rid of someone, you can project a nice roadway scene onto his eyeballs even as he drives off a cliff...

  26. What about Light Emitting Polymers (LEP)? by the_olo · · Score: 1

    Anybody heard whether there has been any progress on getting LEPs from Cambridge Display Technologies into mass production?

    1. Re:What about Light Emitting Polymers (LEP)? by flend · · Score: 1

      I believe there is a James Bond razor available with a polymer display, try, er, this link.

  27. Peril Sensitive Contacts? by Phlatline_ATL · · Score: 1

    Could just see it...

    "honestly officer, my contacts turned totally black when I hit I-285. I couldn't see a thing, but I could still talk on my cell phone so I did." ...

  28. [OT] Re:Glasses for Zaphod Beebelbrox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That reminds me of the procedure for landing a single-engine airplane when the engine quits at night.
    1. Establish best glide airspeed.
    2. When you get close to the ground, turn on the landing light.
    3. If you don't like what you see, turn the landing light back off.
  29. I take it... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

    ...that you've been reading Diamond Age (Phil K Dick) again?

    1. Re:I take it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Psst...
      Neil Stephenson

    2. Re:I take it... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      /me bangs head on desk.

      Kick me. I deserve it. *Sigh*

  30. We ran a related story... by Eric+Smalley · · Score: 1

    ... about this a few weeks ago. "Nanowires make flexible circuits" TRN Oct. 22/29

    --
    Eric Smalley
  31. Screw contact lenses by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    I want a few thousand nanomachines wired right on to the rods and cones of my retinas, telling them when to fire and when not to.

  32. What it would be a better use for ... by Brutal_One · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anytime stories like this pop-up, everyone always discusses how neat it would be to overlay information about a city and the like.

    Forget contacts the zoom, forget contacts that shoot freakin' laser beams. How about contacts that make my vision 20/20? My corrected vision is 20/35 and my contacts can only be worn for 7-8 hours a day then I have to wear coke bottle glasses because there isn't anything better.

    My brother-in-law has Retinitis-Pigmentosa which is a degenerative disease of the retina. He was diagnosed 7 years ago and is down to 10% of his vision which is stricly peripheral. Imagine a spoon in front of your eye and you can only see off to the sides.

    A better use of this technology would be contacts that can adjust his line of sight to the best position on his eye.

    Or to assist the vision of the elderly who often times can be helped with glasses or contacts.

    Instead of coming up with "new" "cool" ways to use this, why don't we use the technology to help the people that need it? The people that surround us everyday?

    1. Re:What it would be a better use for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we aren't as noble as you are.

    2. Re:What it would be a better use for ... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Because of capitalism, products are developed in the interests of maximising PROFITABILITY, not for the good of mankind.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:What it would be a better use for ... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " Instead of coming up with "new" "cool" ways to use this, why don't we use the technology to help the people that need it? The people that surround us everyday?"

      I don't mean to sound cold-hearted, but I have no doubt that the devices you want WILL be developed. Its just not going to be developed first.

      Sorry, suck it up. Thats the way the world works. This has much more potential aside from just correcting someone's vision. To whine about the fact that that isn't the first application for it is like whining that when cavemen were first developing the wheel, they didn't invent it for all the handicapped cavemen out there. I know its not the best analogy, but my point still stands.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  33. Shigawire by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    So - did anyone else out there see 'nanowire' and think that this might be one step toward the development of shigawire?

  34. Gee... by Legssus · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for "Thin CRTs" to come to market...

  35. Where are your training lenses? by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    "One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around."
    Just pray that AOLTimeWarnerNetscapeYadaYada doesn't get their dream role as enforcers of homeland security -- you'll have checkpoints verifying you are wearing your "training" lenses.
  36. making capital instead of destroying it by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    How about if a company made night vision, zoom contacts? Rather than destroying stuff with the new tech, it could be used to make stuff. The military is a really bad jobs/tech development system; it's necessary only as the foreign policy enforcer of last resort. Unless you're a nationalist/socialist - in which case, the military is your be all / end all.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:making capital instead of destroying it by pavon · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, the military is great for research. That's half the purpose of large defense spending; to drive technical progress. Why do you think the US was closing down bases at the same time it was increasing spending for creating high tech equipment? And if you think about it, since alot of research does not have immediate applications, it is not profitable for corporations to do the research unless you give them extremely heavy handed "IP" rights, which end up retarding research. So the only place for this research are in universities and state run laboratories, and is funded largly by the DoD and DoE. I much prefer Defense sponsered research to private "IP" encumbered research.

      Now could we (the people, the government) fund this research through a different means? Sure, but it would be harder to justify to the tax payers, and it would be more difficult to determine criteria for spending. And what is the difference? - the research is still done in both cases, and both the military and the private sector are free to develop applications off of the research in both cases.

    2. Re:making capital instead of destroying it by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Even under direct government management, compare the return on investment from NASA's budget since 1960, and the Department of Defense. Probably better than 1000:1 in favor of NASA. Consider the return in 2003 if $100B of the $500B defense budget was instead spent in academic labs, compared to what it'll return from the Pentagon. Consider a real "tech jobs program" if the money was spent in Commerce Department grants/loans matching American corporate R&D budgets. Meanwhile, consider the damage done to the economy, the polity, the environment, and everything else, by spending the money on making bombs.

      The status quo comes from the kickback schemes among politicians, the Pentagon, and socialist government military contractors, and is protected by the media corporations which own stock in those corporations. It could be easy to convince the taxpayers/voters to demilitarize government R&D expenses. Just rebudget the waste of supply-side pork in salaries to technology production workers nationwide, tuition-subsidizing academic contracts,and better consumer technology, rather than gold-plated bombs. Not to mention the constructive reprioritizing of American foreign policy. As a successful businessman who has witnessed firsthand government contracting, military and otherwise, I know how I'd like *my* tax dollars "reinvested".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  37. Wearable Computing = Total Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wearable computing is the virtual reality of our times. Remember VR? Remember how it was going to Change Everything?

    Remember Lawnmower Man?

  38. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acme(TM) Bridge?

    Beep-beep!

  39. Total Recall by Atryn · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a scene in Total Recall where they could simply hit a button and switch the "windows" between various scenery and info-displays? To me this is incredibly useful as we start packing more and more people into high-rises around the world and eliminating our access to nature.

    Not that I like eliminating access to nature, just saying that would probably sell... Replace your window that looks at the neighboring building and alley with a nano-wire device that can display mountains, skyline, sunset, desert, or just the latest news.

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
    1. Re:Total Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Replace your window that looks at the neighboring building and alley with a nano-wire device that can display mountains, skyline, sunset, desert, or just the latest news.

      Or just the outdoors :) One factor limiting the size of residential buildings is the need for outward facing walls in which to place windows. Imagine larger facilities with e-windows...

  40. The importance of this work by uglomera · · Score: 1

    Dr. Lieber has long been publishing in the area of nanowires, I have read plenty of his and his peers' papers. The importance of this work has nothing to do with contact lenses or futuristic devices that Spielberg loves to put on Tom.

    The problem that the semiconductor industry is facing right now is the ever more-expensive optical lithography systems. As the device features shrink down, we are getting more and more to the point where wavelengths will approach the X-ray spectrum. This is a whole new world of lithography, and people are looking like crazy for another way of doing it.

    Here is the point where a distinction between parallel lithography and serial lithography should be made. For a long time people could pattern sub 10-nm features with AFM and STM (Atomic Force and Scanning-Tunneling microscopes). But those have only a tip (or several tips in parallel in a couple of cases). This would never be a fast and reliable method for patterning the interconnect on a chip, as it is done is series. Dr. Lieber's work is the first one to show some control of nanowire-based interconnect done in parallel. There were tons of studies of chemical self-assembly of nanowires before, but no one had control of the nanowire spacing (design rules for the IC guys).

    Now we have to see if this technology goes somewhere. Another technology for parallel lithography that recently emerged is imprint lithography, where basically you stamp the pattern on the substrate. Dr. Stephen Chou over at Princeton invented that and several companies are already shipping imprint nanolithography systems. Hopefully I'll play on one next year :)

    Now can you please convince my advisor to get me a laptop?

  41. Blue Screen of Death by DumbSwede · · Score: 1

    If your contacts are running windows (whether in focus or not) and you're driving, gives a whole new meaning to blue screen of death.

  42. This is not anything new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    EPSON already released something far better...
    http://neasia.nikkeibp.com/wcs/leaf?CID=onair/asab t/news/275239

  43. www.contactwasher.com by angedinoir · · Score: 3, Funny

    for instance, contact lenses with displays

    "Yes, is this tech support? I think I have a virus in my contact. Everywhere I go, everyone's face is being replaced by banner ads.... Yes, I see it. Yea, it says gator. What I'm screwed?......"

  44. This has been done to death already by Goldsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is already a "standard" way to move nanowires from a substrate to glass or plastic.

    This may be difficult for some of you to believe, but the standard technique is to use scotch tape. It's quite amazing, but you can pick up an array of wires on scotch tape (a similar array to that in the article). Then you simpliy place the tape wherever you want your wires and dissolve it away.

    Of course you're still left with the same problem as on the substrate which is that no one understands how or why these arrays do whatever they may do (which is generally NOT reproducible). Everyone has been shouting molecular electronics for so long that they havn't stopped to actually check that it IS molecular electronics. A timely article in Science last month basicaly served as a retraction for the last 5 years of research in this field.

    It's fine for them to report that they found a new way to move nanowires onto glass or plastic, but the days of saying these types of networks are only a few years away from market are over.

  45. Virtual tours? by pmz · · Score: 1

    Isn't the virtual tour buzzword the kiss of death for new technology? Look what happened to VRML.

  46. This is kinda cool... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    I know I have (somewhere) kicking around in my files a drawing I drew up as an "invention" of contact lens VR devices. Now, I know some of you are thinking "yeah, right" - but it is the truth. I was originally imagining the devices to use hard contacts, with a grid on the contacts driving LCD type elements. I also thought that the electronics would be on the edges of the contacts (which would be mainly driver electronics, pickup "coils" for power supply and datacomms, and position sensors to tell which way the eye was pointed in) and the contacts would have to be larger than normal (to allow for changing pupil size). I also gave thought to using that chemical that widens the pupil to the widest size (which they put into your eyes when you go to get contacts). Finally, I thought about "back-light" shades that you could wear when you wanted full immersion (otherwise it would only be augmented reality - AR). I should have gotten that drawing notarized or something, as it is I only signed and dated it. I didn't think much of it, because I figured others have had similar thoughts before me, and I didn't have the money to patent the idea (I could have easily made a mock up of blown-up scale, or a virtual representation in 3D or something - which would be accepted by the PTO as a model) - plus I figured something like it was already patented. I know I have also posted both here and on k5 about the idea (maybe on Fark, too). I am just glad to see others thinking along this line. I have my doubts on how well it would work (or whether the res would be high enough), but the thing I like most about the idea is that it has the ultimate field-of-view (FOV) possible, by covering your entire pupil, so that you can get true *full* immersion, with peripheral vision and all. If such devices are ever built, they will be amazing to use!

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:This is kinda cool... by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      I know I have (somewhere) kicking around in my files a drawing I drew up as an "invention" of contact lens VR devices.

      Unless that's in a envelope, sealed and mailed to your laywer, forget about your prior art claim once they patent this. Kicking around in my files does not qualify. ;-)

    2. Re:This is kinda cool... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Oh, I never thought it did. I didn't even get the thing notarized - even at the time I drew it up, I had the thought that someone, somewhere, had already thought about this, and that likely a patent already floated around in the PTO's database...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  47. what for? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    everything I expect from wearable technologies and intelligent clothes is that my socks find their pair after laundry :)

  48. Nanowire technology wishlist by armando_wall · · Score: 1


    Nano acrobatics!

    X-Ray contact lenses!!

  49. Realtime distraction and feedback by GNUCyberKat · · Score: 1

    Great. Now we can drive and get a virtual analysis of our insurance rates skyrocketing appearing before our eyes as we crash into that ferrari that we missed because we were getting a virtual tour of the city that we were driving through. Hmmmm, I'm sold.

  50. Lag, motion sickness by jeti · · Score: 1

    Pretty much the biggest problems with current VR glasses is that you can get motion sickness, because the display lags.

    With contacts, you would have to not only track head movement, but also eyeball movement and compensate it without perceptible lag.

  51. Other Great Possibilities by cualexander · · Score: 1

    Contacts with displays? Just imagine the test taking possibilities. Put all your notes in your eyes and then take the test. Same with speeches. Who needs a teleprompter when you have it in your eyes. Or Imagine Karaoke. That would be pretty cool as well. Or attach a gps and you can get interactive directions to anywhere in your contacts. Or truly realistic porn. I mean the possibilites are endless! Screw Virtual Tours.

    1. Re:Other Great Possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or rather, virtual screw tours.

  52. Great, contact lenses by moriya · · Score: 1
    One could imagine, for instance, contact lenses with displays and miniature computers on them, so that you can experience a virtual tour of a new city as you walk around.


    Okay, can it give me a full red color flood with various data graphs and numbers floating around and a cursor? I want to experience walking around with Terminator eyes for a few days.
  53. The picture is wrong by Henk+Postma · · Score: 1
    The picture on the 'overview' page that the story links to is not from the Lieber group, and also not made in the same way.

    It is a picture from the Heath group at Caltech, and the wires are made in a so-called SNAP process. Read about it in the Science article (PDF)