Slashdot Mirror


Winners of O'Reilly's COMDEX Contest Anounced

Alexander Limi writes: "The winners of the O'Reilly "Open Source Goes to COMDEX" Contest have been announced. The lucky ones are: GNOME, KDE, OpenOffice, Zope, GIMP and our own project, Plone. Congratulations to all the deserving projects! Check out the announcement here."

134 comments

  1. This was not an accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I work for O'Reilly and am therefore posting anonymously. While this was done on purpose, it was by a sole author, and not a decision by O'Reilly. That developer has since got a first post.

  2. A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG, How could they forget about [Insert Project Name Here] or [Insert Project Name Here] or [Insert Project Name Here] or [Insert Project Name Here].

    1. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert Snide Remark Here]

    2. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert post accusing you of being a homosexual linux user living in your parents basement]

    3. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert 'MOD PARENT UP' Post Here (it's like shouting)]

    4. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert my big, black cock into your quivering mound of love pudding]

    5. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [insert witty comparison of your mother to an east-asian prostitute]

    6. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by hdparm · · Score: 1

      [And insert first GNAA post above all these]

    7. Re:A POST FOR PEOPLE REPEATING HISTORY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert chuckle at parent for neglecting to click 'Post Anonymously' prior to piling additional crap onto irrelevant joke thread]

  3. Dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comdex isnt for another few weeks, how can somebody have won a prize already?

    Stupid open sores fuktards, check your CALENDAR!

    1. Re:Dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid open sores fuktards, check your CALENDAR!

      Didn't you hear? We had to sell half of November so we could continue our OSS development.

  4. Number of votes? by c_oflynn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Top amount of votes was only 1690. Pretty good amount, but really I would expect more... I mean a slashdot poll had 20000 responses for the top choice!!

    1. Re:Number of votes? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Who was allowed to vote on this? Were there any limits?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Number of votes? by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

      You had to sign up for a (free) O'Reilly account. You could only vote for 3. I voted for KDE, OOo, and GIMP...

    3. Re:Number of votes? by bigjocker · · Score: 1

      Hehe ... exactly my votes. Those three apps have gotten linux more *desktop* users than anything else

      --
      Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
    4. Re:Number of votes? by TrentC · · Score: 4, Funny

      Top amount of votes was only 1690. Pretty good amount, but really I would expect more...

      Well, they had to throw out a bunch of votes for this project; no one could figure out how they got there in the first place...

      Jay (=

    5. Re:Number of votes? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      Why only linux ?
      All three run on variety of Unix like OSes which are, if not any better than linux, atleast equally suitable ( or unsuitable as the case may be) for desktop use.

      Ooo even runs on windows, infact its ability to be cross-platform complient, will deter companies/consumers to move from their existing Windows installations. I mean many companies who already have a large scale existing Windows deployment, would save lots of money just by switching to Ooo from MS Office. Yes they can save more from switching to linux, but that would be a much slow gradual change.

      GIMP also runs on windows, albeit horribly.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    6. Re:Number of votes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same user could vote once every day -- and the KDE project openly enouraged its army of zealots to do just that.

    7. Re:Number of votes? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hmm... didn't know that... This is interesting, but could you give me some proof? (BTW, I didn't know that you could vote more than once...)

    8. Re:Number of votes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick look back over the dot.kde.org archives should prove it.

    9. Re:Number of votes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's official:

      MOD PARENT UP!

    10. Re:Number of votes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GNOME folks did the same thing- they linked to the O'Reilly page which said you can vote daily.

      The reason Plone got a lot of votes is that they had a developers/user conference where this was mentioned. They had over 250 people said conference.

    11. Re:Number of votes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They most certainly did not actively encourage multiple voting!

  5. Are people surprised? by obsidianpreacher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is anyone surprised that the six most well-known (not necessarily "the best", althought I do love them all) projects are the ones that were voted in? Projects that people "in-the-know" (hopefully those going to COMDEX) will already know about? Where are the smaller projects, or other ideas/programs, so they can receive more mainstream publicity?

    I'm honestly not trying to troll here, but just wondering why KDE would be sent, for example, rather than a lesser-known OSS project.

    --
    topreacher@signature.slashdot.org 1% rm -rf sig
    1. Re:Are people surprised? by Narphorium · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While I agree with what you're saying, I think that these six projects are projects the people want to present as examples of how successful OSS can be.

      If COMDEX were only about OSS, then I think the focus would be more on up-and-coming projects. However, open-source is still very much in the up-and-coming catagory itself and I think that this is a necessary step in order to bring OSS even more into the mainstream.

  6. Zope wins twice by PineHall · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plone is built on Zope, so Zope really wins twice.

    1. Re:Zope wins twice by millette · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, if the CMF was considered, zope would win 3 times. Wait, if python was considered, it would have won 4 times! Incredible!

    2. Re:Zope wins twice by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 1

      I'm "stress testing" PLONE in the other tab right now!....oops, sorry, I just got a "502-Proxy Error"....

      Nothing would have said "ready for business" like surviving a full-on slashdotting!....

      Good luck people.

    3. Re:Zope wins twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If OS were counted, X would have won X times!

      If humans were counted, we all would have won the Peace Nobel!

    4. Re:Zope wins twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm, what time did it crash? I was using urllib and didnt see it die once ;-(

  7. Not just name-recognition by supton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a user who uses every piece of software on that list, I have to disagree.

    Sure KDE was a winner - but number one in the vote tally was Plone. Why? Becuase Plone has a large, enthusiastic community. Plone is faily new in the grand scheme of things, compared to these other projects. Why Plone got the most votes is that it has a lot of the most "finishing work" of many projects - it will be a good ambassador for open-source products and frameworks.

    Sure, the KDE, GIMP, GNOME, and OpenOffice folks have been around for a while, and obviously get in on both quality and recognition, but it's important to see that Zope and Plone also are getting a lot of deserved attention at the same level as these other four well-known open-source projects.

    1. Re:Not just name-recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plone won for the same reason KDE got many votes. A small number of fanatics voted as many times as they could. dot.kde.org even encouraged its readers to vote every single day.

    2. Re:Not just name-recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A small number of fanatics voted as many times as they could.

      The O'Reilly page said one vote per day. They could have easily not allowed this, but they didn't.

      The Plone folks had a users conference where this was mentioned, and this vote was mentioned several times on their page. Basically, the most active communities had the most votes: that of Plone, KDE, and OOo. All three communities encouraged their users to vote daily- Plone on their front paeg, KDE on their news page, and OOo on their discuss mailing list. It was all well in the rules.

  8. Great venue! by tintruder · · Score: 1
    It is nice to see this sort of development being publically applauded at a venue like COMDEX.

    Visibilty of Open Source products can only be beneficial and certainly this venue adds credibility.

    One must wonder though if the impact is wasted on the big exhibitors who are there to hawk their wares.

    I mean, do you think Bill Gates is going to stop by, then turn around and say "Ballmer, we need to go open source!"

    Nonetheless, I'd applaud a change in the tactics of Open Source that resulted in enough commercialization to do three things:

    1. Allow more developers to earn a continuing stream of revenue for all their work as it is recognized as a viable and legitimate alternative to the shrink-wrap boxes in the stores today.

    2. Put some downward price pressure on the current Windows software market. WinXP Pro is $200+ to a consumer but $40 to an OEM? And Office at over $400? Come on! Most "shareware" apps go for around $20!

    3. Encourage a greater cooperation by MS when developers seek timely and full disclosure of APIs etc. necessary to build Windows apps. And in the absence of this cooperation, create a genuine market for equivalent retail alternatives for OSs other than Windows. Basically, if MS won't play ball, folks have an easy switch to make without having to change hardware.

  9. just me.. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does plone (minus the tabs) look like just about every other opensource CMS site around? It seems like eventually a new design would break the CMS mold and not go for the choices on the sides, content down the middle look.

  10. Re:Not the best image possible for OSS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to say something derogatory about teh GIMP (I'm assuming the "disaster of Open Source" was OpenOffice, thats certainly how I'd describe it). But it is impossible to use, and still lacks enterprise-grade color management.

  11. Troll, uninformed, mod down please by supton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Open source on the desktop is an important issue, regardless of where you come down on it.

    2. Zope's scalability is more transparent than any other app server or CMS product on the market today. With ZEO clustering coming with little/no need to write extra code to make your deployment scale-out, this is a win. Add to that mature caching frameworks and provend interoperability, the above post is definitely uninformed.

    3. These projects represent an important open-source future, just as much as they represent the present. Eveyone already knows about the Kernel and Apache. This is an opportunity for these important projects to show their stuff and move open source software "up the stack" to higer levels (don't underestimate how important this is to the future of open-source!).

    1. Re:Troll, uninformed, mod down please by babbage · · Score: 1
      Zope's scalability is more transparent than any other app server or CMS product on the market today. With ZEO clustering coming with little/no need to write extra code to make your deployment scale-out, this is a win. Add to that mature caching frameworks and provend interoperability, the above post is definitely uninformed.

      Uhh, not to entirely disagree with you, but it's worth mentioning that I'm aware of a site that has been working on which is allegedly now the world's busiest Zope installation to date (a major newspaper for a city in the northeastern US), and from what I can tell they've had some major problems getting Zope to scale to their needs.

      As a development framework for their creative department, it has a lot of promise, but for the actual delivery of the site, there is a *huge* amount of overhead, even with ZEO clustering and all that, and the site was very unstable with the early versions of the public deployment earlier this year. My understanding is that this architecture got scrapped at the last minute in favor of a tier of simple Apache proxies delivering cached versions of content from the back end Zope servers, because the Zope servers were falling over randomly. (A nice side effect of this scheme is that if the Zope servers fall down, the Apache tier will keep delivering content and the public won't know the difference for a little while.)

      That's not to say that Zope can't work for a large scale site, but it does seem that there is work remaining to be done to get to an acceptable level of stability for very large deployments (e.g. millions of hits per day, much of which tends to come in during a mid-day peak).

      That said, I also understand that this particular organization choose Zope over half a dozen other open & proprietary products, because it was far & away the most flexible toolkit available at the time. The fact that it was far cheaper than some of the big name CMS offerings was just icing on the cake, but it wasn't the factor that made the decision one way or another. Scalabity & stability issues aside, it's a much stronger platform than what they were using previously, and as you note about interoperability, it was far better able to interact with the company's other systems (mainframe stuff for printing a newspaper that was definitely *not* getting replaced any time soon) than any of the competition (who would boast stuff like "oh you can print the newspaper with this stuff too, no big deal" -- yeah right).

      So. Zope is nice, but still imperfect. The grandparent may have been trolling, but he wasn't entirely incorrect in his assertions either.

  12. what a prize.. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    With the possible exception of Plone (just heard of it today) all of the other people involved, would have been going to comdex already..

  13. You are missing an important distinction... by supton · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...that Plone's UI (esp. in 2.0 beta) is modular. It is Section 508 and W3C WAI compliant. It also can be rendered on mobile-phones, large-format, and presentation/print CSS devices without need for ANY changes to the HTML output or multiple sets of templates. From an architecture and extensibility standpoint, Plone's UI is really best-in-class. It also has the largest and most diverse audience and user-base of any open-source CMS, as well as formal standards for process improvement (the PLIP process), which definitely aides in the UI development/refinement process.

    1. Re:You are missing an important distinction... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      It is Section 508 and W3C WAI compliant...

      Wow, Plone has that much buzzword compliance? Must try it right away. Can't wait to test the PLIP process on my 24-character mobile phone display!! 5w337!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    2. Re:You are missing an important distinction... by utopyr · · Score: 1

      We're looking at decent-sized departmental website set up in PHP-Nuke & wondering whether it will be worth the bother to try for Section 508 compliance. Man, it would be great not to have to worry about this. It would be great just for the changes necessary to be practical. Yeah, this is a real thing.
      Kid, don't try this at home.

    3. Re:You are missing an important distinction... by 3.2.3 · · Score: 1

      wondering whether it will be worth the bother to try for Section 508 compliance.

      well, if your project is funded by a government grant like mine, you pretty much have to bother. hence plone.

  14. It's very cool for Zope by tirenours · · Score: 0

    But the fact that KDE and Gnome are going to be there isn't something silly? It will prove the tendancy of the linux community to fragment, which isn't a good thing.

    But again, a very good thing for Zope!

  15. Cluestick: Get new names. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    I swear, the people who create these projects should be beaten:

    ==

    (1) GIMP

    gimp - n : disability of walking due to crippling of the legs or feet [syn: lameness, limping, gimpiness, gameness, claudication]

    (2) GNOME

    gnome - A dwarf; a goblin; a person of small stature or misshapen features, or of strange appearance.

    ==

    Am I to gather that combined they form a small crippled old man? Yessir, those names sure make *me* want to use those products...

    1. Re:Cluestick: Get new names. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Good point. Instead, we should use ones like Windows, Pingus, or Nova.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Cluestick: Get new names. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft - 'nuff said.

  16. Self serving. by zyridium · · Score: 0

    This contest doesnt seem to have any merit.

    Who wants a popularity contest?

    It would be much more interesting to find some smaller interesting projects that might not have 'made it' so far yet and give them the chance.

    OpenOffice is already given much more support than it deserves :P

    1. Re:Self serving. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Normally, to go to comdex costs money, something that many of these projects do not have. This will show the true interest in OSS by comdex participants. If good, then next year, will most likely include a great deal more including many of the smaller ones. Hopefully, a booth is set up with a panel about these smaller projects.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  17. KDE! yay by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm glad KDE got chosen. With the upcoming 3.2 release approaching, it's a good opportunity for the KDE guys to show how good a Linux desktop can be, and that the idea of Linux on the desktop is not so farfetched anymore.

  18. Fragmenting... by Hanzie · · Score: 1, Redundant
    ... prove the tendancy of the linux community to fragment, which isn't a good thing.

    Au Contraire!

    The tendancy of the Linux community to fragment is an extremely good thing! If we have no external competition, we'll make our own.

    Competition is good, it prevents stagnation. Evolution slows to a crawl without competition. Competition gets people excited, and there's nothing I'd rather see than two groups of extremely talented people competing head to head to see who can make me happier.
    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    1. Re:Fragmenting... by tirenours · · Score: 1

      Yup, very true! But I can't help it, I think that the competition between KDE and Gnome is bad. They offer, superficially, the same thing.

      Gnome was born from a ideologic problem with KDE and, from what I see, continues to live for similar reasons. IMO, this is too many efforts in the wrong direction.

      At least, if one of the two was trying to be different... or even innovative?

      (This isn't intended as a troll... just something that made me feel pretty bad about Linux. I once dropped Linux because of ambitions of the linux community on the desktop, which I thought (and still think) was wrong).

    2. Re:Fragmenting... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      GNOME and KDE have always been ideologically different. At first, it was the license issue (which was a valid consideration at the time) and today, its a matter of each desktop's vision. The two desktops have gone in very different directions. GNOME has gone ultra-simple, which pissed off a lot of old GNOME users, but gained a lot of new users. KDE has gone towards the power user's desktop, trading some simplicity for customiziblity.

      So it makes no sense to merge the two products. It'd be like merging MacOS and Windows!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Fragmenting... by tirenours · · Score: 1

      Woh.. not too fast. I never said to merge the two... I just say that two of the same thing is too much. Maybe one is simpler than the other, but the other way, both are Windows clones. One is enough and should be well done.

      The free software community has the power to innovate, why create two project to clone one flawed design?

      I just don't get it.

    4. Re:Fragmenting... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Neither are Windows clones. Do you even use either of them? Superficially, they're kinda like Windows, in that every WIMP GUI is like Windows. At a deeper level, GNOME is more like the Mac (simple, very rule-based GUI design) while KDE is...well, KDE is whatever you want it to be. I've got a pretty Mac-like setup (reduced number of icons, menubar at the top, Mac-style keyboard shortcuts). Of course, that customizibility comes at the cost of a lot of complexity.

      KDE and GNOME both have a large number of users. Both are free, so why continue using one or the other? Because they're different! GNOME users wouldn't want to use KDE, and KDE users wouldn't want to use GNOME. If you got rid of GNOME, GNOME users wouldn't suddenly switch to KDE. They'd probably just grab the last GNOME build and keep working on it. And if you got rid of KDE, well, then I would have to hunt you down and kill you.

      The two projects have different goals, different methodologies, and produce two different products. There's no changing that. There's no point in changing that anyway --- economic theory says that a competitive environment is the most efficient use of available resources (developers). A competitive market will reach a natural equillibrium. For the Linux desktop market, that equillibrum appears to be two competing major desktops.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Fragmenting... by Enucite · · Score: 1

      both are Windows clones

      I guess they're both Windows clones in the same way Windows is a Mac clone...

      They're both desktop environments.
      Each has a completely different design philosophy.

    6. Re:Fragmenting... by tirenours · · Score: 1

      What you don't seem to get is that they both, superficially, aim for the same goal, which is achieving the same level that Windows already have.

      You don't believe me? They both implemented a file manager with a web browser integrated. Is it really useful? They both created a clone of Microsoft's COM/OLE. They both created a Document/View framework (okay, for their office "products"). Gnome created a clone of the Registry. They are also creating a .NET implementation.

      Were have they innovated? Where are they better than Windows? KDE can put the menu on the top of the screen?? It supports alpha transparency?

      My point is there. I understand that they are both different. I have never used KDE longer than 2 days in a row but I have used Gnome for a few months so I really remarked a difference. But fondamentally, they aim for the same thing, and I think it is a wrong goat. It is good to favorise the transition of users conditionned to a Windows world. But have they realised that maybe, it is not the best concept for a good UI?

      With all the human resources that the free software community can have, we can do better. Way better.

      Stop copying the design of other successful software. Create, innovate. That will really give reasons to use Linux. Presently, linux just have an "alternative to Windows" label.

    7. Re:Fragmenting... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You don't believe me? They both implemented a file manager with a web browser integrated.
      >>>>>>>>>>>
      No they didn't. Nautilus uses HTML to display certain views, but its not a web browser. Its *ancient*. Epiphany is a completely seperate application. Konqueror isn't just a web browser either. Konqueror is a complete document viewer. Its just a shell for any KPart. That means its a web browser, picture viewer, media player --- whatever you want it to be.

      Is it really useful? They both created a clone of Microsoft's COM/OLE.
      >>>>>>>>>>
      Neither are clones of COM/OLE. All three are byproducts of the same phase in the mid-1990s, where every desktop came with an object model. MS did COM/OLE, IBM did SOM, Apple did OpenDoc. Under the hood, both Bonobo (based on CORBA) and KParts are *very* different from COM/OLE.

      They both created a Document/View framework (okay, for their office "products").
      >>>>>>>>>>
      Except KDE doesn't juse use it in their office suit. They use it *everywhere*.

      Gnome created a clone of the Registry.
      >>>>>>>>>>>
      gconf is a lot more advanced than the registry. Its a GUI interface to a configuration system that can have any back-end representation. Right now, it uses XML config files for that representation. Storing configuration info in XML files is not a MS innovation to say the least. In fact, in Longhorn, the binary registry is going away, and they're moving to a gconf-like model.

      They are also creating a .NET implementation.
      >>>>>>>>
      Mono is not affiliated with either GNOME or KDE.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:Fragmenting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Konqueror is a complete document viewer. Its just a shell for any KPart. That means its a web browser, picture viewer, media player --- whatever you want it to be.

      This is any different from Windows Explorer how? When I click on for example, a ppt document in IE, PowerPoint embeds itself in IE (one reason I don't use Mozilla-- very little integration with the OS)

    9. Re:Fragmenting... by joeytsai · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, I really don't care much about desktop environments. I personally only need multiple desktops and a way to start my programs, but I really just want stuff to be out of my way. Certainly the gnome terminal versus the KDE terminal isn't really something I care about. That said, I am a gnome user, but not because I think it's any better or worse than KDE.

      The only reason that I use gnome is that I've found pretty much every cool GUI application written for X is written in GTK. Gimp, Gnumeric, Galeon, Abiword, Sodipodi, Pan, Evolution, etc. Obviously I'm aware that there's competent KDE/QT (are there any QT only apps?) replacements, but it almost always seems to be the GTK/gnome versions are much more interesting.

      Sure, you can say Konquerer is about equivalent to Galeon or KWord is like Gnumeric. But even given those, I've never seen a comparable Gimp or Sodipodi or dozens of others GTK/galeon applications. Basically, while most KDE users I know run at least one or two GTK/gnome applications (which thankfully is relatively painless nowadays) I've never had any reason to run a QT/KDE app. And since I'm quite successful running only GTK apps, I don't really care to bring in a whole other desktop set of dependencies.

      The only exception to this rule that I've found is KDevelop, which I've heard is a great IDE. Particularly because the gIDE/Anjuta/Scaffold situation hasn't really matured yet. Still, even then I hear Eclipse's GTK port is getting better...

      Anyway, that's just my opinion on desktop usage. I'll use whichever one has the best applications.

      PS - A recommendation - could you use blockquotes or something similar in your replies? Your >>> scheme is visually very unhelpful.

      --
      http://www.talknerdy.org
    10. Re:Fragmenting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two words: k3b, quanta.

      their gtk equivalents are quite horrible compared to the kde equivalents.

      I pretty much only use two gtk apps these days: xmms and gaim. I'd switch to kopete over gaim, but it doesn't work with my proxy. I hate jukebox apps like juk, and I perfer xmms.

  19. race to bloatware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gosh.

    all the awarded software, exception made for gimp, is bloatware. :|

  20. Slashdot in Plone? by frostman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just had a look at the Plone site and I like it.

    Can we have Slashdot in Plone now please?

    Seriously though, it would make a great CMS migration case study.

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

    1. Re:Slashdot in Plone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Plone is ok, but I'd rather see it in Pascal. But not C, please, it allows such a mess with = and == ...

    2. Re:Slashdot in Plone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god man! Are you suggesting Slashdot ditch it's wonderful perl system for a python cms? Flame on!

    3. Re:Slashdot in Plone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you dont have it in Plone, but there is a Zope version which is called Squishdot, have a look at:
      www.squishdot.org
      I myself did www.gimp.de with squishdot and it works great. There was some work on a CMF-based version called Swishdot, you have to ask Chris Withers about it. (CMF is Zope's Content Management Framework on which Plone is based). regards
      Juergen

  21. Excellent! by mikemcc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Excellent news. I've been using zope and plone for a few months now for intranet projects at my employer, and I am very, very impressed with that software stack. The plone 2.0 betas illustrate the the Plone team has some extremely talented UI people. I look forward to reading more about these technologies.

  22. not just buzzwords! by supton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make fun of "buzzwords" if you will, but getting open-source into government and private-enterprise that works with government is important, and lack of accessibility is a deal-breaker for those kinds of projects. Standards are important to doing business with technology - that's the process you go through to generate something called money (perhaps you've heard of this, no?).

    1. Re:not just buzzwords! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha, if standards were important for money Microsoft wouldn't be the richest company in the world.

  23. You always know Unix-based free software ... by Chromodromic · · Score: 1
    If there's a list like, "And the winners are, Bink, Shputz, GBR (goober), Splong, VORKO, and Dwinky!"

    But DON'T, for God's sake, tell fans of the products that they projects might benefit from name upgrades, nooo. You're assaulted with logic like: "Screw you, bastard! I've been using Splong for two years, and it's the best thing ever and marketing should be called moroning and Splong is a cool name anyway and you're just stoopid, you cocksucking ape!"

    No. I gave up. My next open source work is going under a goofy name. Oh, and I'll sue anyone that tries to use Splong.

    --
    Chr0m0Dr0m!C
    1. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had to go around giving people unwholesome ideas, didn't you? Now I'll be up all night trying to think of an acronym for my next project that matches Shputz.

    2. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. I tried suing. Got nothing. Bastards.

      Sincerely,
      Lester "Les" Balzac
      President/CEO
      Eunuchs, Inc.

    3. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by ajf442 · · Score: 1

      Here's one for you to sue! :-)

      http://splong.free.fr/

    4. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Kalantian-Sproing-Bumple-Tzimmer-Maan-Poim-Poim-Po im.

      Works for me...

      Hey, Slashdot broke my poim!

      (Now, just between us: don't you find "slashdot" a little weird?)

    5. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by utopyr · · Score: 1

      And another:

      http://www.vorko.pl/

      Do they make vacuum cleaners?

      Schputz, I don't want to touch.

    6. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Let's break this down:

      KDE & GNOME: They are acronyms --- K Desktop Environment and GNU Network Object Model Environment. They're really no worse then all the acronyms used in the commercial world --- CDE, CORBA, COM, MFC, etc.

      OpenOffice: This is weirder than MS Office how?

      GIMP: GNU Image Manipulation Program. Again, its a perfectly sensible acronym. Okay, so Photoshop is sexier, but the computer industry is comfortable with acronyms --- so GIMP is actually a pretty conservative name as far as things go.

      Zope/Plone: Okay, fine you've got a point with those. Python people are weird :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by Spoing · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If there's a list like, "And the winners are, Bink, Shputz, GBR (goober), _Splong_, VORKO, and Dwinky!"

      You misspelled "Spoing". :)

      But DON'T, for God's sake, tell fans of the products that they projects might benefit from name upgrades, nooo.

      Agreed. One of my recient favorites is referred to as "DCL" at work. Calling it by it's full real name Double Choco Latte would not get any management sign off. DCL, though, sounds like a serious product. Though the logo for Double Choco Latte is nice, I've whipped up a replacement one; very booring, only text, in the corporate colors.

      Recursive acronyms are great for geeky projects (geek is a positive, of course), though I hope fewer projects do this unless the users are only going to be geeks.

      Here's my take on the names of the winning entries;

      1. GNOME & KDE -- Both OK, but not great. The foot and gear logos are nice. That said, "Windows" and the "window" logo are pretty dumb. OSX and the Mac logos are damn nice.
      2. OpenOffice -- Good and to the point; it's an office suite, and it's open.
      3. Zope -- Cool; in a class like "Exxon". Zope is not a simple thing to explain, so it's OK that it's name does not mean anything intutitive.
      4. GIMP -- Wilbur is a good logo/mascott, though the name requires explanation.
      5. Plone -- Not cool like "Zope". Reminds me of "prone" (a sign of weakness) and "clone" (just another project).
      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    8. Re:You always know Unix-based free software ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have given money to Bush/Ashcroft. Then you could have gotten by with murder. Literally.

  24. WHY NOT REPEAT HISTORY? SHIT,VIETNAMS ALREADY BACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Vietnam is back so we might as well just repeat all the other stuff too...

    So all you guys that signed up for the reserves for a little college money ready to ship out and get shot at with rocket propelled grenades every night or what? woohoo, fun...

  25. Community enthusiasim is an important part.... by supton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...of the development process. Projects with vibrant, enthusiastic communities will tend to exceed, both socially, and technically. This is one of Plone and Zope's greatest assets. So, if you think of it this way, it is more than a mere "popularity" contest - it is a measure of dedication, enthusiasm, caring, and a bit of zealotry (not in a bad way) - these are good leading indicators as the the strength of the product via its support mechanism and community.

    1. Re:Community enthusiasim is an important part.... by zyridium · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your point is my point -- that we need to improve the community around other projects, not the ones that already have them established.

      a bit of zealotry (not in a bad way)

      Zealotry is *always* bad IMHO. It is the most unprofessional attitute imaginable.

      Dont mind me, I am trying to write an honours thesis :(

  26. For people who don't see first sentence in article by modder · · Score: 1

    Ladies and Gentleman, we are very pleased to announce the winners, as you voted, for the projects that will be attending Comdex at the "Open Source Pavillion":


    (Or is this supposed to be some kind of joke?)

  27. YOU THOUGHT HE WOULDN'T?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you actually expected a pampered rich boy who hid out in texas during vietnam and had everything handed to him by daddy (like baseball teams, sports cars, mansions, yale degree, etc.) was actually going to do a good job?!

    Oh and he was fucking born in god damn NEW YORK, he's not a cowboy he's a fucking DUDE, he can't even ride a fucking HORSE, even Clinton could do that! Even VLADIMIR PUTIN can do that! So put your macho fantasies somewhere else you southern fascists.

  28. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    31. You think that linux cannot crash.

    We'll my linux box has been up for the past 136 days and I can assure you it definat

  29. Why is GNOME before KDE in the list? by jokkebk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is it just me, or did anybode else wonder the order of the winners in the story?

    I mean, it isn't alphabetical, it isn't ordered by the amount of votes. Mentioning Plone last because it has a comment attached is reasonable, but moving GNOME from the bottom of the list in front of KDE and preserving the order otherwise was odd.

    The first thought that occurred to me was "so, the GNOME seems to have beaten KDE", so I was slightly surprised when I read the O'Reilly announcement.

    --
    http://codeandlife.com
    1. Re:Why is GNOME before KDE in the list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a quote of a comment on the article, the article itself didn't have links to the projects.

      It's probably just a matter of the poster naming them in a semi-random order rather than some diabolical attempt at brainwashing.

  30. My Criteria by NEW22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I voted a few times in the contest. My votes were for OpenOffice.org, Audacity, and VNC. Both VNC and OpenOffice.org (especially!) have made my job easier and saved a lot of money in my overwhelmingly Windows workplace. Audacity is just great, and fun. Aside from my personal like of the programs, they all share the feature that they are cross-platform. It doesn't seem so useful to me to go to a conference showcasing your software, then when its all said and done, someone realized they would have to change their operating system just to use it. Anyone interested in Linux has at least passing knowledge of Gnome and KDE and if they were to obtain Linux, they will almost certainly be using one of them. Maybe the reason for bringing Gnome and KDE is really to promote Linux as a whole, which is fine. For me personally, though, a program that is free is great, and a program that is free AND I can share it with my friends regardless of their computing environment is even better.

  31. KDE vs GNOME by tehanu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed that KDE has more than twice the number of votes that GNOME does (in fact KDE came 2nd whilst GNOME came 6th). Either this means KDE has a lot more users than GNOME or it means that KDE users are much more enthusiastic about their desktop than GNOME users (and hence more likely to vote for said desktop). Actually I must admit, I wonder if there are any statistics on the popularity of GNOME vs the popularity of KDE. As far as I can tell all of the major distros except Red Hat come with KDE as the default desktop, but then again Red Hat is by far the most popular distribution in the mainstream...

    1. Re:KDE vs GNOME by dracvl · · Score: 1

      I don't think the numbers reflect anything else than enthusiasm from the users - which is an interesting measure in itself. We were ranked as #1, even though we probably have less users than any of the other projects on the list, we're also the "new kid on the block".

    2. Re:KDE vs GNOME by be-fan · · Score: 1
      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:KDE vs GNOME by be-fan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In a survey done by EDC KDE is used by 65% of Linux developers, while GNOME is used by 56% (some overlap). So I'd guess that KDE's userbase is a bit larger --- remember a lot of Linux users are European, and the biggest distro there (SuSE) is very KDE-centric. Overall, I'd guess KDE has a slightly larger userbase.

      The other reason is probably that KDE users are rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth maniacs. In my experience, they're much more enthusiastic than GNOME users. Compare the popularity of dot.kde.org vs gnomedesktop.org (the major news sites for each desktop) and the popularity of kdelook.org vs the popularity of art.gnome.org.

      PS> I say the above as a KDE user :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:KDE vs GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      gnomedesktop is a lot more fun. There are regular user v developer battles fought in the stories, and plenty of criticism of GNOME and its direction... all very healthy. And you end up learning plenty.

      Compare this with dot.kde.org -- the userbase is sycophantic and rabid... and the admin of the site actively deletes anything critical of KDE, its direction or current implementation.

    5. Re:KDE vs GNOME by GrimReality · · Score: 1
      Either this means KDE has a lot more users than GNOME or it means that KDE users are much more enthusiastic about their desktop than GNOME users (and hence more likely to vote for said desktop).

      About my habits and preferences: I am a GNOME user and a fairly new XFce user, I might make XFce the default session (currently it is GNOME) on next OS upgrade when I get the new 4.x version of XFce, and even then, I would definitely be keeping and using GNOME (not abandoning it all together). I use KDE for trying it out, and I have not quite been able to make it my preferred desktop (just a matter of personal preference).

      Now, that I have told you of my preferences, I will say that I voted for GNOME, KDE and GIMP. Why KDE when I apparently don't like it?

      I have only used 2.x versions (not 3.x) and even in 2.x I am impressed by the tight integraton, consisitency etc., (although I suppose the responsiveness of KDE is not quite to my taste) KDE 3.x seems to be even better and as far as I can see, I could put my sister up before a KDE desktop and she would be quite comfortable with it, while she would whine on for ever about my favourite GNOME DE. I think that is a great point here.

      And of course, I want to see the two DEs going on together, rather than one of them alone

    6. Re:KDE vs GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Compare this with dot.kde.org -- the userbase is sycophantic and rabid... and the admin of the site actively deletes anything critical of KDE, its direction or current implementation

      The same thing used to happen in the old news.gnome.org site. Both the present dot.kde.org and the old gnotices site use a engine called "squishdot". Squishdot is pretty damn old, buggy, and doesn't allow any sort of moderation except for deletion or changing the text. hell, it doesn't even have any sort of accounts- it's all anonymous posting pretty much. Thus, moderation on dot.kde.org and gnotices involved editors deleting and changing text.

      Gnomesupport.org, which doesn't seem as popular as gnotices once was, is based on a modern system, which allows user accounts and user-based moderation, like slashdot. Most anti-GNOME comments on gnomesupport.org are comparatively modded down to a point where most people won't ever see them.

      In the end, it's all in the method of moderation.

    7. Re:KDE vs GNOME by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Erm, how about people who voted for KDE __and__ gnome?

      I did. I voted for KDE, GNOME, and OpenOffice. The KDE and GNOME communities aren't mutually exclusive for any means. Many people just voted for software that they consider important.

  32. Question regarding Plone by Lendrick · · Score: 1

    Okay, so it's a content management system... I get that. What I'm curious about is whether Plone would be useful for things on a small scale -- for instance, a site that has a few (maybe five) people who can update it, and require no review or workflow to do so. Is it good for this, or is it too complicated for simple needs?

    1. Re:Question regarding Plone by dracvl · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can easily remove the workflow or make an ultra-simple one like private/published. It might be overkill for your use, but if you have an hour to try it out, it's probably the easiest content management system to install and set up out there.

  33. Innovation by The+Herbaliser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate to say this, but two of the selections seem to have the primary purpose of duplicate functionality found in proprietary applications. Should we really be celebrating pieces of software that while powerful, really don't provide anything remotely new or original, and are basically knockoffs of MS and Adobe products (although OO's embrace of XML is kind of cool)?

    It almost seems as though those two selections help to validate many of the criticisms that have been made regarding the open-source model: namely that it lacks true innovation. Many projects, including some of the selections prove such suggestions to be false. I just think it's a shame that projects have been included that have really contributed very little to the advancement of the field.

    1. Re:Innovation by Malcontent · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is nothing wrong with trying to get OSS replacements for commercial software. MS has "embraced" all kinds of innovations from it's competitors for years now.

      Are you really suggesting that OSS should not have an office suite or a GUI because someone else thought of it first?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    2. Re:Innovation by Hylander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to disagree with this. I've been using Zope and Plone for about six months now, and they have some of the most innovative stuff in them I have seen for a long time.

      Seriously, go check them out. Once you're up to speed on Acquisition, ZODB Persistence, Zope Page Templates, Plone customisation and the rest of it, come back and tell me it's not innovative!

      Seriously, this technology owns.

    3. Re:Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whatever.

      Who wrote the rule that the only value is to be found in "innovation"? You are one of those channel surfering novelty seekers completely lacking in attention span.

      Novelty is for children.

    4. Re:Innovation by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Should we really be celebrating pieces of software that while powerful, really don't provide anything remotely new or original, and are basically knockoffs of MS and Adobe products

      And Microsoft Word was a knock-off of StarWriter and WordPerfect, which were in their own rights knock-offs of previous generation word processors. The advancement of the field is sometimes slow, and it's sometime apparently stagnant as we work on elaborating the current state of the art before we can figure out which direction forward is.

    5. Re:Innovation by The+Herbaliser · · Score: 1

      I think Zope and Plone are great innovative products and I had them in mind when I said that certain projects disprove the suggestion that open source is not about innovation. I just wish more innovative projects like Zope and Plone had been selected.

    6. Re:Innovation by The+Herbaliser · · Score: 1

      You're right, there is nothing wrong with trying to make open-source competitors to commercial software.

      And I'm also not suggesting that an OSS shouldn't have an office suite or a GUI because someone else thought of it first.

      What I do think, is that when they are open-source tools that do things better than their non-open competitors, and have introduced new and innovative features, we're instead highlighting projects like GIMP and OpenOffice, that are essentially just knockoffs.

      I'm not saying we shouldn't use them. I use OpenOffice all the time. I'm just saying that they're not really something to get all excited about.

    7. Re:Innovation by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "What I do think, is that when they are open-source tools that do things better than their non-open competitors, and have introduced new and innovative features, we're instead highlighting projects like GIMP and OpenOffice, that are essentially just knockoffs."

      I guess it's kind of a push for me. OO is not without innovation. For example take the fact that it could be scripted with many languages. To me the biggest "innovation" in OO is the fact that it's format is 100% documented. That enables projects like plone to parse and display OO documents very nicely.

      Did you know that if you upload a OO document to plone it will be automatically converted to HTML and indexed? That's the power of open source and open formats. OO enables that.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  34. Actually, Plone excells at this... by supton · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plone obviously scales well, but is also very easy to use for quickly getting started with small-group content management. Consider this:

    • Plone is easy to install - get Andy McKay's Win32 installer or Jim Roepcke's Mac OS X installer Get 'em here and you will be up and running in 10 minutes with a Plone site pre-configured by the installer. Also you can get RPM or DEB packages.
    • Default workflow and content types let you hit the road running: you have documents, news items, events, images, etc.
    • Customization examples are available - Andy's ZopeZen skin is available in the collective - a good example of doing a weblog-style site in Plone.
    • Plenty of add ons mean less code you have to write: check out the collective project on sf.net, mentioned above.
    • Membership and security is built-in - you could do complex stuff like authenticate off of mysql or LDAP, but the default user-folder (and upcoming group support in Plone 2.0) system is capable and easy to work with without the fuss or worry.
    • Simple workflows can be changed through the web; you want to do a google search for "CMF workflow just publish" - or better yet, just grant your small group publish abilities, and let them choose to do it. If you want to hack the edit script, one line of code would trigger the publish workflow transition, if you want to save some clicks. The point is that this is very customizable, and on the other end of the spectrum, you can do things like email notification in your workflow scripts with a bit of cut and pasting some stock code.
    • Recipes abound on zopelabs.org under the CMF category
    • With Plone 2.0, you can seriously customize the UI without changing the templates, just by haing and admin change values ina web form that are plugged into dynamically generated CSS.
    • One of the most supportive mailing lists and IRC (#plone on irc.freenode.net) channels on the planet.
  35. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) Windows is a collection of operating systems (NT4/2K/XP) an operating envoronments (Windows 3.x/95/98/ME) while Linux is only a kernel.

    Looking at Windows and it's software packages to Linux Distros and packages all I can say is "They are all full of holes!"

    Some software packages have more security problems than others. Sendmail is about as insecure as Outlook Express is. As long as we are traveling down this slippery slope. . .

    The main reason that BSD has been so successful at avoiding security holes is by default almost every package is installed with every feature turned off. BSD can be rooted just like any other OS when misconfigured. I just wish Microsoft would take a hint and ship Windows with that stupid messaging service turned off.

    2) I tend to meta-mod about half the troll mods as being unfair. Many troll posts are people who write something that could be valid, but they don't back up what they write with examples, proofs, rationals, whatever and are just plain rude. People tend to ignore posts that say "You have problems. . ." or "Nothing will get past that shit that fills your head,. . ." or are simply off topic.

    3) Windows 2K does not seem to support my soundcard. Linux does. Sure this is the exception, but it's my exception :) More and more companies are providing drivers for linux so if you know what you are doing finding parts that work with Linux is not that dificult. Newbies are still kinda screwed in this department unless they got something like RedHat/RootHat/NewbieHat that detects everything for them.

    4) I like Mac, Dos, Linux, but not Windows. If you want to know why, ckick here.

    5) I actually know of a highschool that uses linux thin-clients. Yes, the school's admin is a Linux uber-geek. Linux is also good at word processing, instant messaging, gimp is kinda like mspaint.exe on steroids, playing a few games and that's about all I do.

    6) Most people I have talked to already know about Linux, even the ones who don't like computers. Maybe where I live is the exception. Um, what does knowing about an OS have to do with if it is good or not?

    7) I have no idea what you mean by "professional printing capabilities." I use CUPS and it works fine with my DeskJet 712C printer.

    8) Why compile when I can type apt-get install package-name?

    9) I have not ever looked into professional desktop publishing for Linux. I guess I could just use ClarisWork 2.0 for my Mac.

    10) I just heard something about a Linux video editing package at sourceforge.net. I have no idea if it requires the pure use of your left mind over your right mind, but I don't do video editing so I dont care. Actually I know more people who do video editing on Macs than Windows.

    11) I have been very happy playing Heritic II on Linux and xScorch rules! Okay, in general Windows is better at being a toy than Linux. Happy? Keep in mind that some games will not run under some newer versions of Windows.

    12) Most people do not understaind their OS. That's what seperates most people from those who don't have a life. (Sorry, I just couldn't help it.) I have yet to meet a Linux zealot who is too dumb to understand Windows.

    13) I have no problems pointing and clicking or "wading through cryptic scripts written by lunatics." I do have a problem wading throught cryptic scripts written by other lunatics. Actually looking at other people's scripts is a good way to learn what to do and what not to do.

    14) "Nothing will get past that shit that fills your head, you will not admit to any facts."
    Now you are just being rude.

    15) If you think the naming in Linux is weird then don't ever download MINIX. Okay, so Linux has oddly named devices. Windows has cryptic named system files. I'm sure it seemed like a good idea at the time.

    16) The only media technology of Microsoft I have ever used is me

  36. Do you mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yoda? Ya ya ya ya ya Yoda?

  37. Re:HOLY FUCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I CRAPpED MY PANTs AN HOUR AGO, AND I DON't EVEN CARE!!!!1

    I sincerely think this should get post-of-the-year award.

  38. You forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is [Insert Project Name Here] doing on the list?!?! Only people of questionable parentage and sexual habits use it!!!

  39. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by Gwala · · Score: 1

    Good Point's, however WINE has been in beta for about a decade now (I Believe the project started in early '93) I dont believe it's going to ever go final :P

    That being said, however, I have had excellent experience with WINE, it run's all major application's with minor annoyances if you are willing to spend a little time configuring it. (Ie I run Dreamweaver, MSN Messenger [amsn doesnt work behind the proxy here], and several other program's with almost no issue)

    -Gwala

    --
    #!/bin/csh cat $0
  40. gnome?! WTF by SQLz · · Score: 1

    GNOME won the most unintuitive GUI award and the worst overall window manger award.

    1. Re:gnome?! WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word.

      metacity has got to be the most annoying POS window manager in existance.

      I can't beleive they picked that shit over sawfish, which was/is one of the best window managers available.

  41. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by SQLz · · Score: 1
    Misc Info: I currently have 3 comps with Debian GNU/Linux, 1 dule boots Windows 98 and Debian GNU/Linux, and a 68K Mac. No, you can not have them.

    I tihnk you confused us with people who give a shit what you have.

  42. Plone conference videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is great for Plone, in fact I voted a lot for plone!

    Anyway, anyone knows when are the plone conferences going to be digitzed? I CANN'T WAIT!

  43. Slashdot in Plone? Done! by axxackall · · Score: 3, Informative
    Can we have Slashdot in Plone now please?

    Done, it's called Zope Zen.

    Seriously though, it would make a great CMS migration case study

    Speaking about case studies, check available docs, alive borads and screenshots for NeoBoard and CMFBoard. As you can see - both are developing in the same direction (kind of mixing Slashdot and PHPBB ideas), and both have already achived very similar quality and functionality levels, dispite the fact that CMFBoard was mostly developed from scratch (although under strong influence of many ideas from other available boards), while NeoBoard was re-written from PHP to Plone by the original PHP developer of the original PHP-based NeoBoard.

    --

    Less is more !
  44. Comdex still exists? by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I thought they were bankrupt (the local paper had a story about a former Comdex marketing rep reduced to selling Tupperware).

  45. Re:KDE! yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed. I am historically a GNOME user (KDE never felt right for me), but I got a new Dell laptop a few days ago, installed Slack on it, and tried out the new KDE 3.2 beta on it (instead of installing Dropline GNOME on it, like I usually do.)

    And, I have to say, -holy shit-. KDE 3.2 has a lot of things going for it. Konqueror, especially, has become one of the best programs in Linux. It starts up almost instantaneously now, and Apple's changes to khtml have really seemed to make it a much better and speedier web browser. I haven't even needed to touch Firebird in the last few days.

    The Plastik theme included with KDE 3.2 is also great- it's the first KDE theme I actually find visually appealing. I actually like it a bit better than Industrial now (my former favorite). They have many of the same design elements, but Plastik is slightly less flat. It still gets out of the way and looks great.

    The beta was beta quality however, and I noticed a few bugs. If these get fixed, the KDE team has a new convert in me when 3.2 final is out!

  46. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't AnimeFreak either. Why are you using his e-mail address?

  47. Gave yourself away by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    I voted a few times in the contest.

    Let me guess, you work for Diebold, right?

    -- MarkusQ

  48. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I tihnk you confused us with people who give a shit what you have.

    Uh, no. That info is there because I have posted about using Windows and Linux I want to make it clear that I am not some nutjob or zealot who installed GNU/Linux 5 years ago and haven't touched a Windows box ever since.

    BTW, please don't ever give a shit. Please keep your shit to yourself. :p