Slashdot Mirror


New Graphics Company, With Working Cards

gladbach writes "Toms Hardware has in their hands an actual working card, unlike other vaporware cardmakers *cough* bitboys *cough*... To quote Toms: 'A new player dares enters the graphics card market that ATi and Nvidia have dominated for so long. XGI (eXtreme Graphics Innovation), based in Taiwan of course, comes at the market leaders with a line of cards for a whole lot less money. We look at XGI's product range, and offer results of a beta model from XGIs top model Volari Duo V8 Ultra.'"

56 of 461 comments (clear)

  1. Let there be Linux support by kauttapiste · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well if they provide good support for X and OpenGL and maybe even with open source drivers, I'll be buying one instead of that NVidia I was planning to get soon.

    1. Re:Let there be Linux support by reaperbean · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well according to Linux Hardware there will be XGI provided Linux drivers in a few months!

      --
      Thinking is good, I think.
    2. Re:Let there be Linux support by Cereal+Box · · Score: 3, Funny

      Linux users are at a point now that we can make or break a company

      You don't say. Would you care to point out either a company that has been reduced to nothing (besides Loki -- ha!) or skyrocketed to success solely on the awesome strength of Linux users?

    3. Re:Let there be Linux support by blixel · · Score: 4, Funny

      VA Linux! Biggest IPO of all time. Granted they are bankrupt now, but that's beside the point, no really - it's beside the point.

    4. Re:Let there be Linux support by Dark+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, linux on the desktop isn't real significant right now, but that could easily change with a little help. Linux on the desktop is at the point where it could use some help from one of the graphics card companies. Open source drivers and/or open specifications are needed if linux is going to get big on the desktop. A manufacturer releasing open source drivers and/or specs would help linux on the desktop grow and they would certainly be in a position to take advantage of that growth. This would certainly help the KGI/GGI projects. Linux is about choice. Card manufacturers currently support linux in a very limited fashion with binary drivers. Buggy drivers? Well, your stuck with them if/until the manufacturer decides it's worth there time. But it won't be because no one will want to use linux for games because the drivers aren't any good. See the circle? In the windows world, there is one OS with 90%+ desktop market share. The linux world is a whole new ball game. Linux is about choice, choice in every part of the OS. Linux is about open source and open specifications. In order for linux to thrive and the hardware vendors that support it, they must play by the rules that have made linux a success on the server. The first vendor who does will fuel the growth of linux on the desktop and in turn will benefit greatly from that growth. A symbiotic relationship, if you will. Such a strategy would benefit XGI greatly since linux on the desktop is starting to get some pretty big buyers, and they could drive and ride that growth in terms of market share. The wireless card manufacturers could learn something here as well. How does it harm you to open up your specs or even the source to your drivers? Does it really give you a big advantage over the other market players? If the answer is no, then why not put a little effort into opening your specs and/or source and see what happens? You will be pleasantly surprised.

    5. Re:Let there be Linux support by ultranova · · Score: 2

      I care, so the kernel module part can be integrated into the kernel, meaning I don't have to patch and fix the wrapper layer code every time I update new kernel (NVIDIA)...

      And that's assuming they provide a compilable wrapper. If they don't, I can only use the card with the kernel versions they bother supporting, making me completely dependent on their mercy for continuing use of my card...

      I'd be an idiot to buy a card that becomes useless the second the company goes bankcrupt / drops support to get me to migrate to newer models (or, to be excat, the second I next update the kernel).

      So, the answer to your question is, everyone cares, unless they're never going to update their kernel.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Let there be Linux support by Animaether · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet your enter key still has the original matte finish to it :)

    7. Re:Let there be Linux support by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please tell me why drivers, which by all accounts should simply jet textures, T&L info, and shader info off to their respective memory locations, could possibly make a company uncompetitive -- especially when they are selling me a chunk of silicon, rather than some piece of software? If it's because it could betray info on patents and such, I think that someone at ATI has a decent microscope if they REALLY want to learn how NVidias chips are made, and they also have a set of drivers of their own, as shocking and scandalous as it may sound...

      --
      It's been a long time.
  2. interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    thats pretty nice, hope they bring down prices... looks like their best will be priced at around $300. if it isn't a total flop, ATI and nvidia might face some competition. i'd sure like to get a high performance card for 300 or 350, and a nice midrange for around 100... we'll see. maybe a midrange card on sale might even go for $70. i've seen some 5600s @ $90, it could go down more

  3. Aren't you forgetting someone? by Pingular · · Score: 5, Informative

    A new player dares enters the graphics card market that ATi and Nvidia have dominated for so long
    What about Matrox, who've been dominating the multiple monitor graphics card market for years?

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh man, now prepare for FPS boys, you used the evil Matrox word ;-)

      They dominate scientific market too... Especially Medical imaging...

      Perhelia is a hit amongst pro gfx people...

      But none of them will let you play Quake III in 500 fps

    2. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference is that XGI makes dirt cheap slow parts, while Matrox makes ridiclously expensive slow parts.

      Seriously: it sounds like Matrox is going down the tubes. They recently downgraded their card from DX9 to DX8 and have been having major problems getting new driver releases out and dealing with game compatibility. There might be a handful of 2D applications that need Matrox cards, but it's not a good general purpose solution nor anything you should even try for gaming.

    3. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Ark42 · · Score: 4, Interesting



      I personally find NVidia's TwinView to work a lot better, if you have a card with two outputs, which most of the GF4s and higher seem to have now.

      We might as well ask about S3 if we're asking about Matrox. Remember that great card they had a while back?

      The best we can hope for is a pricewar I think. Cheaper Nvidia or ATI cards is always better.

    4. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of the newer cards does have Linux driver, but not as good as the G400 drivers. Matrox should have keept doing what they did right with the G400 series. Working 3D, Dualhead and TVout, oh and the driver was platform independent (Yes XFree86 allows platform independent drivers).

      If my G400 dies I wouldn't know what to buy, there are no videocard this good around anymore. The drivers are nothing short of excellent.

    5. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by reaperbean · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another company, S3, is back with a new line of cards here. They are also looking to break into the market this quarter.

      --
      Thinking is good, I think.
    6. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Informative
      "What about Matrox [matrox.com], who've been dominating the multiple monitor graphics card market for years?"

      True. IMO Matrox is best for non-gaming applications. One thing a lot of people forget is that Matrox is a significant player in the digital video products that deal with video capture and real time editing. Their RT.X series of DV editing products are among the best in the price range.

    7. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Informative

      FYI, Diamond is not S3 any more. S3's core graphics division(i.e. the chip engineers) was merged with VIA, and the rest of S3 was sold piecemeal. Best Data bought the remainder of the graphics division(the names, the card designs, etc) and are relaunching Diamond MultiMedia as a video card company making ATI and Nvidia cards.

    8. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For analog video (CRTs) Matrox has always been the best as far as image quality.

      ATI and nVidia (traditionally) had horrible video quality (blurry edges, ghosted edges due to ringing, etc)

      Awhile back, I helped a friend of mine upgraded his video card to gain dual display. The first thing we tried (his first choice) was some type of GeForce4 card - it worked, and ran games plenty fast, but the image quality was not really that great particularly for high resolution desktops (Dual 19" Sony CRTs) and the cooling fan had a really annoying tone.

      Just for curiosity, we went back to the store and picked up an ATI Radeon (9500 Pro I believe.) The video quality for high resolution desktop was vastly superior to the nVidia card. Not only that, but the ATI card actually supported higher display resolutions than the nVidia! (I think the nVidia maxed out around 1600 where the ATI went up to something like 1920 and could drive both monitors at the highest supported resolution!) Games seemed to play equally well on the ATI card and the cooling fan wasnt so annoying.

      He ended up returning the nVidia and keeping the ATI.

      Now, for DVI output (to LCD displays) this is theoretically not a problem. With DVI the signal from the video card to the LCD is digital and you shouldn't have problems with blurry edges or ringing like you get when driving a CRT from a video card with crappy analog VGA outputs. So if you plan to use DVI, this comparison doesn't really apply to your application.

      Personally, I still use an old Matrox card to drive a 21" Sony CRT but if I were to upgrade, I would choose ATI based on the above experience.

  4. Tom's Hardware by stone2020 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did Slashdot just discover Tom's Hardware this week?

    1. Re:Tom's Hardware by sirsampson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, seems as though slashdot doesn't even know about slashdot. Just look at all the dupe stories.

  5. Variety, Nvidia and 3dfx by dolo666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember when Nvidia came into big production, and a lot of us Voodoo owners were skeptical at first that anyone could oppose the great Voodoo cards from 3dfx (the same cardies that revolutionized how we all play Quake). Smart business policy, quality hardware and lots of blood, sweat and tears have pushed Nvidia to where it is today. As a gamer, I welcome any new blood to the table, because it just means that the race for the mother of all graphics suites is getting that much more interesting... and the road is shorter when the competition is fierce!

    Competition is the mother of invention, if necessity can't possibly be. :)

    Seems that XGI is going after some odd designs, using the fabled 3dfx dual chip design as a way to get more bang for the buck. It's not a solution, as Tom's Hardware reveals that this results in more problems. The problem? Half-norm memory usage. *ouch*!

    Still, this is the first line for XGI. I'm sure we'll see a lot more from them, if they don't go broke.

    1. Re:Variety, Nvidia and 3dfx by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with most of that. I'm not sure the memory thing is an issue at the moment though - memory is dirt cheap. Huge chips are more than 2x the cost of smaller ones, for only 1.5x the transistor count...

      I dunno. Could be a shrewd move, could be a monumental screwup :-)

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  6. Drivers by Indio_do_Xingu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most difficult thing is to release good drivers. Until then, I will wait to see how they really perform.

  7. Relief thy name is XGI by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article: Of course, there are no official comments on who is pulling the strings, but it seems clear that XGI is on solid financial ground.

    And that is all I really wanted to hear. Thank goodness they won't be a fly-by-night company. This is a very welcome addition to the market. Lets also hope that they either make linux drivers or open the arch so developers can do so.

    The great thing about new companies with financial legs to stand on is that they can learn from the mistakes of others without having to make them themselves as well as learn from the things done right by other companies.

    I for one welcome our future (their mission statement is to be #1 by 2007) GPU overlords!

  8. Re:I smell the rotting corpse of Aureal Vortex by stone2020 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It helps if your competitors don't sue you out of business like Creative did to Aureal.

  9. Going from the beginning to where nVidia failed by W2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't foresee this going very well for XGI. Firstly, look at the cards. Dual chips, non-shared memory? 256 megs on the card, only 128 available because the chips can't share. "Wasting" 128 megs might be acceptable, considering the card is still pretty cheap, but how about when high-end cards start coming with 512 MB or more? If XGI start putting 1024 MB of memory on their cards they are going to see any advantages their cards may have in pricing go bye-bye pretty quickly. Remember, going for quantity rather than quality was what killed 3dfx. How quickly some people forget :)

    Second problem is that due to the size of the card, it's not gonna fit in smaller form-factor PC's. Why they put such a huge HS on the back of the card, where there's usually not much space, versus just putting more cooling on the front of the card, where high-end users (of nVidia cards, anyway) are already accustomed to leaving a PCI slot open to make room, is beyond me.

    Those two big fans they've stuck on their reference board sure aren't going help keep noise levels down, either. My (reference) Radeon 9800 Pro still beats the crap out of most cards on the market today, and it's only got a small HSF for the chipset and nothing on the memory chips. And I was still able to OC it quite a bit. If nVidia's and XGI's chips really require as much cooling as manufacturers stick on them, even on "reference" boards, they must be very inefficient chips indeed. These things aside, it's always nice to see more competition in the graphics chipset business, hopefully prices might come down a bit as a result if ATi and/or nVidia see XGI as a real contenter, rather than a wannabe like Matrox (though I don't know if they're even at the "wannabe" level any longer, considering how poor their chips are nowadays).

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    1. Re:Going from the beginning to where nVidia failed by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Remember, going for quantity rather than quality was what killed 3dfx. How quickly some people forget :)

      Well, I disagree. The reason 3DFX was killed off, the partners decided that they wanted to be the only vendor for 3dfx boards, they killed off all 3rd party vendors. Then they bought STB so they could release boards, and that never panned out. So with the 3DFX limited release, nvidia expanded with new OEM partners, and easily took over the market. Vendors need to release boards, even if cheap OEM boards, they need a product to fill. 3DFX took that away from all the smaller companies. And believe it or not, lots of people buy OEM quality products. Even CompUSA and main stores carry an OEM selection selection with a sticker on the box to make it look retail.

      3DFX could of lasted another 2 years with the multi-gpu design, and had another GPU in development. The Partners tanked the company, sold few a few million, and walked away. They had better visual quality at the time. OpenGL was a little flaky, but could of been fixed with drivers, they had a great developteam that moved on to other GFX companies.

      I had a Voodoo5 and a GF3-ti500 both the hottest cards out at the time. The Voodoo5 with only 2 CPU's kept up almost every game. But after the drivers stopped from 3DFX, you had to move to different hardware.

      This is where Sis+Trident=XGI can rock. Trident has been making OEM chipsets for years, Sis makes motherboard chipsets. With a good design, and to use Multi-GPU's to make boards faster, they can cut a good niche out of the low end market.

      ATI and NVidia use the same CPU cores for most boards, they just cripple and use the GPU's that dont pass high end tests. This is why when the ATI 9500 came out, you could driver hack it to a 9700. Also they use less expensive ram, and limit the hardware. This doesnt exactly save that much money, a few bux, but the selling price can be 50-100 dollars more. Most people wont spend 400 bux on a high end GFX card, but the 99 dollar sweet spot is a big field, and if XGI can come up with a card to fill that niche, they could come out as the heavy hitter and take over some major piece of the market.

      Also, back in the .com days, SIS, Trident made most of the low end, SVGA cards that powered almost every server I seen. Until Intel started putting gfx chips on boards. They have the background, and with the man power out in the market right now, they could easily take 10-15% of the market on Initial release.

      Of course, after reading the article, 300 bux release, and not the top preformer, they better tweak the hell out of those drivers. Maybe multi-core could help, but it at the performance of the 9500/5700, it needs a little more performance. Maybe driver tweaks, since its still beta could bump it up. Nvidia and ATI are already tweaking the drivers like crazy if you watch the benchmarks out everymonth, so tweaking and optimizing drivers does help.

      -
      Power by Nvidia, pfft. Spend more time fixing bugs, and less time suckling on the nvidia tit...

  10. XGI isn't new, its trident and Xabre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    XGI is just Trident with a new name, and Xabre added in

    From webpage:

    'Founded in May of 2003 and headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan, XGI pulls from a deep reservoir of engineering and design talent stemming from its acquisitions of Trident Microsystems, and Silicon Integrated Systems' graphics divisions.'

    Although it says Taipei, most of the hard core engineers are in san jose, in the old trident building, right across from Fry's electronics. Go say hi, they're a nice bunch

    1. Re:XGI isn't new, its trident and Xabre by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The rank-and-file may be nice people but I don't remember any Trident or SIS graphics chip living up to the hype so they end up getting relegated to the budget market.

      I wish them luck, but I hope that they have something up their sleeves to fix all the defficiencies found in Tom's testing.

  11. Re:XGI = SIS + Trident by Uber+Banker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not according to their corporate strategy! corporate strategy!

    It is good to see the graphics chip market is not too much of a closed shop for any new companies to enter. I would like to know how they plan on getting around the many recent patented methods nVIDA and ATI share with each other, will the SiS aspect get around this? I am not anexpert, please enlighten me!

  12. Whoa!! by garglblaster · · Score: 5, Funny
    ..XGIs top model Volari Duo V8 Ultra

    WOW!!

    but - wait a minute - guess I'll wait for the Volari Quattro Triplex V12 Turbo GTI XXL
    _ThAT'll be a nice graphics card!

    --

    perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

  13. Re:XGI = SIS + Trident by sirsampson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is different from ati how?

  14. Re:XGI = SIS + Trident by HexRei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Card not supported? Isn't that what an API like Directx is for, so that developers don't have to write support for the cards directly into their games?

  15. A quick summary of the article for Linux users by DeathPenguin · · Score: 4, Informative

    OpenGL performance in Quake 3 and Enemy Territory on these boards roughly matches that of a comparably priced GeForce FX 5600.

    Drivers haven't been tested, but LinuxHardware reports that Linux drivres will be available in Within the first quarter of next year. Let's just hope it doesn't suck suck and that there are some real perks of running an XGi over a GFFX5600.

  16. Graphs and statistics by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting that if you look at the graphs, the blue line doesn't appear to do that well (mid-table stuff) but reading the text, it's currently only running at 450MHz not the specced 500MHz and with beta-level drivers.

    Multiply its figures by (at least) 500/450 and they look a lot better - normally just (really just, indistinguishably so) behind the leaders...

    Cheaper, huh ? About time too :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  17. If you read the article.... by ewhenn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... and looked at the results, some were abysmal. Yes, this is still a ref. board, but it seems to run a game great for the price, or horrible for the price. Wolf ET is based on the Quake3 engine, yet Q3 is dramatically higher than Wolf ET (this card came in LAST place in Wolf ET), and this is wiht games based on the same engine. Sorry, I would rather shell out 175$ for a car that will consistantly perform decent across the whole spectrum, than pay 300$ for a card that is sometimes great and sometimes sucks.

    1. Re:If you read the article.... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, for 175$ I'd take that damn dollar sign and put it where it belongs, in front of the number!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  18. Re:XGI = SIS + Trident by XO · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A long, long time ago, in a graphics market far, far away, S3 used to have some pretty awesome chips and drivers. I used to say "poo" on the S3 stuff, after exeperiencing several Diamond manufactured S3 based cards that were piles of crap, with drivers that absolutely sucked for anything but Windows - the Windows drivers got around all the bugs of the cards, whereas the drivers for all other OS's were just reference drivers, and illuminated hundreds of issues with the hardware.

    Then, I discovered, upon using a couple of computers that had reference boards, rather than Diamond-enhanced boards.. that the reference boards, with the reference drivers were an order of magnitude better, faster, more stable, than what I had believed from teh Diamond junk.

    Just because XGI is a "new player" (with experienced hands) and the beta card sucks and the beta drivers suck.. doesn't mean that they can't make quality out of it.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  19. No thanks... by stubear · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me know when the Type-R model is available though.

  20. Tom's Hardware by Sivar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, Tom's Hardware. Not trying to be negative, but IMHO, they are a terrible source for tech information, and the bulk of their reviews contain startling errors, conclusions that defy reason, glaring omissions, and sensationalized reporting.
    The majority of those writing the reviews clearly have no idea what they are talking about, at least regarding the subject they are reporting on. Overall, I would rate them slightly above HotHardware.com.
    Tom himself, as far as I can tell, is on the ball and knows his stuff VERY well, but he doesn't write articles much anymore, and obviously doesn't read them either.
    It is a common practice among hardware enthusiasts to quote Tom's for the humor value, trying to see if the author of the latest article is even more clueless than he was in his (or her) last article.
    To be fair, they do have some excellent articles occasionally, and were the first ones to dare publish information on Intel's unstable Pentium III 1.13GHz processor, but unfortunately these seem to be the exception rather than the rule.

    Also, as has already been stated, XGI is hardly a new company. Of course, these bits of SiS and Trident are in completely new territory if they are trying to compete in the high-end gamer's market. Considering that this is their first real foray into that market, I think they have done an amazing job. I'd say give them the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise. Remember, even the (once) most respected companies in the field can faulter, and that XGI has something that is even in the same ballpark as the most seasoned of players is an impressive feat.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  21. I'll say it....... by Veramocor · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll say it because no one else will. Tom is an ass.

    But more importantly his reviews suck! I haven't even looked at this one but i venture to guess it's at least 15 pages, milk that advertising cash cow, tom!

    If brevity is the soul of wit, then you are one dumb mother fucker Tom.

    Now for the informative part of by rant:

    try www.hardocp.com
    or
    www.anandtech.com
    or
    www.ac eshardware.com

    all 100% better than tom's

    --
    Veramocor
    1. Re:I'll say it....... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny

      So ... you feel that Tom's Hardware is completely useless. Fair enough, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

      You then say that [H]ard|OCP, Anandtech and Ace's Hardware are 100% better than Tom's Hardware. Fair enough, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

      However - 100% of useless is still nothing, so what you're saying is, that [H]ard|OCP, Anandtech and Ace's Hardware are also useless. I don't think that's what you were going for ...

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  22. Re:XGI = SIS + Trident by flewp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. I've used ATI cards for about 5 to 6 years now. I've had 3 cards, and they've all run great, never had a problem. Some people just get an idea in their head and they refuse to believe otherwise.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  23. Re:Ehh... best of luck to them, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Matrox used to be a leader in the graphics market. I lived in Dorval and I now some people who used to work there. The story is they started to get all uppity about potential new employees' grade point averages. They would only hire people with a GPA above 3.8.


    The thing is, to get these marks you either cheat, or are an idiot savant, or effectively a genius. Now you put all these people in the same room, what do you get? Superior products? No.


    You get ego clashes, clueless idiots, hangers-on and cheaters who couldn't design a 10ms monostable with a 555 and a book from Radio Shack. NO real-world experience, NO real skills whatsoever.
    The Matrox you see today is due to universities run wild and employers being blinded by them.


    Just another example of the irrelevance of university to real-world problems.

  24. Entice them to support Linux by kenneth_martens · · Score: 4, Interesting

    XGI is a new player in this market and need something to distinguish themselves from the competition. This is an opportunity to persuade them that supporting Linux by releasing drivers would gain them positive reviews and have an impact on sales. Linux is gaining in popularity in the enterprise and server areas, so announcing Linux support for their products would sort of *legitimize* XGI's cards. It's worth a shot--the question is, how do we convince them?

  25. Here, I'll save you sum time by drix · · Score: 2, Funny

    The good news: a new, cheaper GFX company bursts on to the scene to challenge Ati and Nvidia dominance.

    The bad news: the cards suck ass.

    So basically, nothing has changed since you woke up this morning.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  26. why not parallelization ? by master_p · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A new graphics company enters the game...yawn. They sure have no aces up their sleeves. They could though, if they had used a parallelizable engine (tile rendering, for some), and they could just add more processors as new models are requested by the market. They could also make cards upgradable.

  27. Toms hardware is running BSA ads by scrytch · · Score: 4, Informative

    I will never visit or recommend tomshardware again as long as they run ads for the Business Software Alliance.

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  28. Questionable if they match a 5600 by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The quake3 page shows something interesting, but look at the scores on the ET page. It comes in dead last by a long shot. Looks roughly to be in GF3 range. That's kinda typical for most minority GPU vendors I've seen over the years. They can usually come close to matching entry level cards and a benchmark or two but fall down miserably on the vast majority of benchmarks. Think Kyro etc.

    Also these "3rd party" GPU vendors tend to not have the resources to implement truly state of the art functions. So while their may be some PR on advanced Pixel Shader support I'd be surprised if they can ever pull it off. I know I mentioned Kyro already, but I can just see the same thing happening. Poor performance was blamed on drivers, but then in the end we learned that the card just wasn't that good and no amount of driver tweaking could make up for its architectural flaws.

    I do welcome another player, but I'm sure not holding my breath that they will be able to compete on a technical level with the big boys. In most cases consumers will still be better off buying the previous generation of GPU's from established vendors who have all their kinks worked out and have proven that they will be around long term.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  29. The Latin is a little off by jazuki · · Score: 3, Informative

    THG is a little off on the Latin:

    1. Volatus means flight, not velocity

    2. Volari appears to be closer to volare, meaning "to fly"

    3. Velocity comes from the Latin velocitas (meaning quickness), which is derived from velox (meaning quick)

    While the fact that the two stems (velo- and vol- for velox and volare) share initial consonants suggests that there is a relationship between these stems, this relationship is more likely to have arisen in some proto- or pre-Latin than Latin itself.

  30. Bad news for the game industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a PC game developer. We recently released a W32 game which uses OpenGL.

    Some hardware companies were especially responsive when we found driver bugs and in general were very helpful and an absolute pleasure to work with. nVidia's developer relations team is head and shoulders above the rest.

    Just about all others were very good. I don't think it would be fair to expect anything more than what all the rest gave. I'd put Matrox, Intel, ATI, 3Dlabs, and S3 in this category.

    Then there was SiS and Trident. We experienced tremendous bugs with the Xabre. Numerous times I offered small code examples to reproduce these bugs. These are very big bugs; crashes if you use a 3d texture, crashes if you use certain keywords in a vertex program, incorrect rendering of primitives, etc. It was around a year before we shipped I started to contact IHVs to ensure any bugs they had could be worked out. SiS and Trident didn't give a damn.

    It is one thing to develop good hardware. That is 1/3 of the task. Companies have been doing that for years. Remember the g400? Great hardware, aweful drivers. The next 1/3 is making everything run correctly. ATI, which is pretty good these days, is still fixing bugs like flipped textures in Flight Sim 2004 (which would obviously affect other games, FS04 is just the first to expose it) in their latest drivers. How mature can we expect the drivers to be from a new company? Not too good, given no new company has done it first try and these do have a track record of being aweful.

    The final 1/3 of the driver is to extract maximum performance. I'm not too worried about this unless it comes before the other more important parts as generally this is some form of cheating; or as Trident called it "application specific acceleration"

    I truely pitty somebody who buys one of these cards because it gets the same 3dmark score as a GeForce or Radeon, but costs $10 less. There is more to a good card than the scores it gets in the most popular benchmarked games, it is more important that it runs all the games you want. The Xabre can't run FS2004, Splinter Cell, Homeworld2, etc. Atleast Intel's integrated graphics which may not be that quick do run everything reasonably well.

    Please remember this when you recommend a system for a friend. Please insist they either spend the extra money for an nVidia or ATI product or simply get a card in their price range with less raw 3dmark performance from nVidia or ATI.

    You get what you pay for when it comes to software support!

  31. Re:Actually, no. by jregel · · Score: 2

    I use Matrox cards and will continue to do so for any new boxes. The 2D quality of Matrox cards is *still* better than Nvidia and ATI. I will happily concede that for 3D, Matrox do not make competitive cards, but I don't run any 3D applications on my PC. For 3D, I've got a PS2.

    It's all to do with finding the right tool for the job. I've yet to see a decent web browser / email client / nntp client / terminal that requires fast 3D graphics. YMMV.

  32. Re:Big deal by scrytch · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Slashdot (the biggest anti MS site) runs banners for MSDN subscriptions. Whats your point?

    Feeding the trolls: Microsoft sells a product. It may be a crappy product that OEM's are strongarmed into reselling, but they're still a business. The BSA exists to shake companies down with license audits, and has jackbooted thugs literally break down doors to ensure compliance.

    Slashdot is "anti-microsoft" insofar as there's a large and very vocal segment of its population consisting of semi-literate fanboys who have knee-jerk reactions to everything involving microsoft.

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  33. Re:Actually, no. by 13Echo · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? I've never had a buggy Matrox product, but I've also never owned one of their Parhelia products. Millennium, Mistique, G200/G400... All were excellent products.

  34. XGI Homepage by dennison_uy · · Score: 2, Informative

    More info on the Volari Duo straight from the XGI Homepage

    --
    Take off every 'sig'!
    All your 'sig' are belong to us!
  35. Re:Ehh... best of luck to them, but.... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Employers like me because I actually can use my skills to build something, not just repeat stuff I heard in school like a parrot without understanding.

    Well someone with a U degree woudln't repeat stuff from school anyway. At a real university they don't teach many directly applicable things anyway. They're not supposed to. That's what tech schools are for, and maybe that's what you're thinking of...