Slashdot Mirror


New Graphics Company, With Working Cards

gladbach writes "Toms Hardware has in their hands an actual working card, unlike other vaporware cardmakers *cough* bitboys *cough*... To quote Toms: 'A new player dares enters the graphics card market that ATi and Nvidia have dominated for so long. XGI (eXtreme Graphics Innovation), based in Taiwan of course, comes at the market leaders with a line of cards for a whole lot less money. We look at XGI's product range, and offer results of a beta model from XGIs top model Volari Duo V8 Ultra.'"

9 of 461 comments (clear)

  1. Aren't you forgetting someone? by Pingular · · Score: 5, Informative

    A new player dares enters the graphics card market that ATi and Nvidia have dominated for so long
    What about Matrox, who've been dominating the multiple monitor graphics card market for years?

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Aren't you forgetting someone? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Informative
      "What about Matrox [matrox.com], who've been dominating the multiple monitor graphics card market for years?"

      True. IMO Matrox is best for non-gaming applications. One thing a lot of people forget is that Matrox is a significant player in the digital video products that deal with video capture and real time editing. Their RT.X series of DV editing products are among the best in the price range.

  2. Tom's Hardware by stone2020 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did Slashdot just discover Tom's Hardware this week?

  3. Variety, Nvidia and 3dfx by dolo666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember when Nvidia came into big production, and a lot of us Voodoo owners were skeptical at first that anyone could oppose the great Voodoo cards from 3dfx (the same cardies that revolutionized how we all play Quake). Smart business policy, quality hardware and lots of blood, sweat and tears have pushed Nvidia to where it is today. As a gamer, I welcome any new blood to the table, because it just means that the race for the mother of all graphics suites is getting that much more interesting... and the road is shorter when the competition is fierce!

    Competition is the mother of invention, if necessity can't possibly be. :)

    Seems that XGI is going after some odd designs, using the fabled 3dfx dual chip design as a way to get more bang for the buck. It's not a solution, as Tom's Hardware reveals that this results in more problems. The problem? Half-norm memory usage. *ouch*!

    Still, this is the first line for XGI. I'm sure we'll see a lot more from them, if they don't go broke.

  4. Drivers by Indio_do_Xingu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most difficult thing is to release good drivers. Until then, I will wait to see how they really perform.

  5. Going from the beginning to where nVidia failed by W2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't foresee this going very well for XGI. Firstly, look at the cards. Dual chips, non-shared memory? 256 megs on the card, only 128 available because the chips can't share. "Wasting" 128 megs might be acceptable, considering the card is still pretty cheap, but how about when high-end cards start coming with 512 MB or more? If XGI start putting 1024 MB of memory on their cards they are going to see any advantages their cards may have in pricing go bye-bye pretty quickly. Remember, going for quantity rather than quality was what killed 3dfx. How quickly some people forget :)

    Second problem is that due to the size of the card, it's not gonna fit in smaller form-factor PC's. Why they put such a huge HS on the back of the card, where there's usually not much space, versus just putting more cooling on the front of the card, where high-end users (of nVidia cards, anyway) are already accustomed to leaving a PCI slot open to make room, is beyond me.

    Those two big fans they've stuck on their reference board sure aren't going help keep noise levels down, either. My (reference) Radeon 9800 Pro still beats the crap out of most cards on the market today, and it's only got a small HSF for the chipset and nothing on the memory chips. And I was still able to OC it quite a bit. If nVidia's and XGI's chips really require as much cooling as manufacturers stick on them, even on "reference" boards, they must be very inefficient chips indeed. These things aside, it's always nice to see more competition in the graphics chipset business, hopefully prices might come down a bit as a result if ATi and/or nVidia see XGI as a real contenter, rather than a wannabe like Matrox (though I don't know if they're even at the "wannabe" level any longer, considering how poor their chips are nowadays).

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
  6. XGI isn't new, its trident and Xabre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    XGI is just Trident with a new name, and Xabre added in

    From webpage:

    'Founded in May of 2003 and headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan, XGI pulls from a deep reservoir of engineering and design talent stemming from its acquisitions of Trident Microsystems, and Silicon Integrated Systems' graphics divisions.'

    Although it says Taipei, most of the hard core engineers are in san jose, in the old trident building, right across from Fry's electronics. Go say hi, they're a nice bunch

  7. Whoa!! by garglblaster · · Score: 5, Funny
    ..XGIs top model Volari Duo V8 Ultra

    WOW!!

    but - wait a minute - guess I'll wait for the Volari Quattro Triplex V12 Turbo GTI XXL
    _ThAT'll be a nice graphics card!

    --

    perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

  8. Re:Ehh... best of luck to them, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Matrox used to be a leader in the graphics market. I lived in Dorval and I now some people who used to work there. The story is they started to get all uppity about potential new employees' grade point averages. They would only hire people with a GPA above 3.8.


    The thing is, to get these marks you either cheat, or are an idiot savant, or effectively a genius. Now you put all these people in the same room, what do you get? Superior products? No.


    You get ego clashes, clueless idiots, hangers-on and cheaters who couldn't design a 10ms monostable with a 555 and a book from Radio Shack. NO real-world experience, NO real skills whatsoever.
    The Matrox you see today is due to universities run wild and employers being blinded by them.


    Just another example of the irrelevance of university to real-world problems.