Slashdot Mirror


Windows Media Player 9 for Mac OS X Available

corsa writes "I found Windows Media Player 9 for Mac OS X on Microsoft's site today. I downloaded it and have it running under Panther. It seems to play WMV9 files, at least the few I've tried so far."

18 of 70 comments (clear)

  1. Ultimate in Downgrades by michaelnz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've already downloaded and installed this and it is without a doubt one of the worse releases of a piece of software I've seen. In the past my copy of Media Player would at least run some of the videos that QuickTime wouldn't, now nothing. I've tried running every WMV file I could get my hands on and none of them play. It seems that Microsoft has chosen to go with less functionality, not more.

    It's an interesting move for Microsoft, especially after the release of iTunes for Windows. Apple is doing it's best to convert Microsoft users by offering them incredible software. Microsoft is offering Mac users shitty knockoffs of Windows software.

    I'm guessing this is a gambit to make Mac users realize they can't have the cross-platform operability that OSX seemed to bring about, that if they want to use Windows files they should run Windows. Ultimately I think the frustration that people will feel towards the new Media Player will cause even more resentment towards Microsoft. Apple's attitude that you lure more flies with Aqua than you do with water is definately the winning strategy.

    If you don't already know (and chances are if you're reading Slashdot you do), you should be using VLC. It does everything this crappy Windows port does and more.

    1. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by mccalli · · Score: 2, Informative
      Apple is doing it's best to convert Microsoft users by offering them incredible software. Microsoft is offering Mac users shitty knockoffs of Windows software.

      Oh come on, even as a happy OS X user I have to say that this bit is slanted. iTunes for Windows doesn't follow any of the guidelines for Windows software - it is, to use (some of) your phraseology, a knockoff of Mac software. Not integrated into the Windows look and feel at all.

      So Microsoft made similar decisions for their media player under OS X. Fine. You can argue the quality of the two apps reasonably and objectively, but saying that MS's non-integrating WMP for OS X is a Windows knockoff, but saying that Apple's non-integrating iTunes is "great software" is pure advertising nonsense.

      View the software on its merits. It might still fail, but at least you'll have tried the correct approach.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Artifex · · Score: 3, Funny
      I've already downloaded and installed this and it is without a doubt one of the worse releases of a piece of software I've seen.


      Wow! So it's like Quicktime for Windows?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Domini · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I tend to agree with the previous poster.

      I've installed it and I cannot even seem to play an AVI. Ok, let's see... integration with look and feel: iTunes for windows has ALL the functionality that the Mac version has. It is not a crippled product.

      WiMP for Mac on the other hand does not play the same files as WiMP for Windows. It does not have the visulisations, library support, options, enhancements (audio/video... not UI), it's UI is sucky... all the things that make WiMP for Windows a killer app is not present in the Mac version!

      Argh!

      I love WiMP for Windows (Check out the Media Player Classic project on Sourceforge!) I love iTunes (even for Windows). But as excited as I were about WiMP9 for Mac.... it sucks.... a real disapointment!

      I do not think I'm biased... I love MS for Games/Video, Mac for Mail/Web/Music/Work and Linux for Programming.

    4. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Artifex · · Score: 2, Informative
      iTunes for Windows doesn't follow any of the guidelines for Windows software - it is, to use (some of) your phraseology, a knockoff of Mac software.


      Don't forget Quicktime for Windows. Recent editions are better, but only some versions will play some movies, and so forth.

      Also, I wonder if the poster saying that Microsoft is offering sucky programs for Mac users knows about Office X. I haven't heard bad things about that, yet.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Office X. I haven't heard bad things about that, yet.

      Stupid filename-length limit.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  2. And this even exists because? by heapacreep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that microsoft might only be releasing this as just another piece of software for the MacOS, unless of course, they will be using it as part of a music store like the itunes version, just crappy and with a bad file type. We all know how that would go over within the mac community. It also does not seem like they would be releasing this to steal the thunder from another product's new release, so here is the question...WHY BOTHER? Quicktime already exists, and there are many other better file codecs and ecoders for that matter out there than the .wma junk...

    --
    --Shut up and get a mac--
    1. Re:And this even exists because? by sickb0y.lvlp! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      being a win user for years, i've never found that qt sucks in win.. except for IE crashing with it a few times.. not that it doesn't do that otherwise ;)

  3. Eventuality by HebrewToYou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The true goal of MS is to only write for only one platform. They will soon cut off the Mac BU's ability to update Office v.X and force users to purchase the *new* Mac Office suite: Virtual PC and Office for Windows. Windows Media Player 9 ain't that bad, but the fact that MS refuses to update the UI just reinforces what I wrote above. WiMP is just a horribly media application for the Mac....and for good reason.

    --
    I'm not popular enough to be different.

    Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

  4. Application folder change by CoolMoDee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I installed it yesterday and the installer changed the icon on my Applications folder from the default to the stuffit exapnder icon. This release is truely rushed. The wmv file i threw at it, it couldn't even play it. MPlayerOSX had no problems playing that same file.

    --
    Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
  5. if it doesnt work for porn... by redwood2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I downloaded this this afternoon and every chunk of porn I threw at yielded the same results:
    mozilla launching to a page about media rights or something...
    hmmmm...

    It has since been deleted.

    Cig? Don't mind if I do...

  6. Die, die, die by Squozen · · Score: 5, Informative

    WMP for OS X sucks, pure and simple. On a 1.25Ghz CPU with 1Gb of RAM running a fresh install of Panther, WMP 9 started struggling on a local file after 20-30 seconds, stuttering and skipping frames. Use VLC and hope that they integrate all the annoying Microsoft proprietary codecs soon.

    Interestingly, RealPlayer isn't bad at all on the Mac. I held off on installing it for quite a while after seeing all the baggage that came with a Windows install, but it's pretty clean and seems to stream video well.

    1. Re:Die, die, die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you tried copying a 17 meg file while it is playing?

  7. Conspiracy? by ZxCv · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe Microsoft is just out to get you. I installed this new version on Saturday, and while its interface could use some work, I found the media support to be a million times better than the last version of WMP for OS X. It not only played the files that the last version wouldn't, but several files that had audio or video glitches when played with the last version now played flawlessly. Perhaps your installation got screwed up? Try reinstalling it, and more importantly, deleting its existing files from ~/Library/Preferences before you reinstall (this second part actually fixed an issue on my friend's machine).

    And, while VLC is great, I have still come across a number of files (Windows Media in particular) that it won't play correctly or won't play at all. My best solution has come down to keeping updated versions of QuickTime, RealOne, Windows Media Player, VLC, and Mplayer around. In my experience, this has been the only way to make sure I can play every media file I come across.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  8. RealPlayer: Surpisingly Refreshing by michaelnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, RealPlayer has done a great job with their Mac player. It's small, doesn't hog system resources and an easy install. Everything that WMP should have been.

    Isn't it odd when RealPlayer comes off as more professional than Microsoft... Well, maybe not that weird.

  9. Less functionality than version 6.3 ?? by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't hate this program as much as some of you, but it's a big disappointment. No wonder there's no mention at all of its release on the Microsoft Mac site. Strangely, some of my files which version 6.3 final (for Classic OS) can play just fine, are a no-go with this new version. According to the discussion on MacRumors.com, OS X lacks support for a particular audio codec used in a lot of WM files, which is causing some of the incompatibilities.

    However I'm not complaining too much, because some WMV files which VLC could not play for me, run fine. (I haven't tried MPlayer for OS X so I can't comment on that.) And on my 1 GHz G4, it's reasonably fast, and not crash-y. Ugly interface by Apple standards, but actually better than I might have expected. Much less ugly than the Windows version of the player.

    --
    "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
  10. Here's the link to older version by beetle496 · · Score: 2, Informative
    For me, this version (9) plays audio on some movies that were previously silent, so I like it.

    The parent in this thread was asking about 6.3, available only for Classic. The installer left my Classic version of Windows Media Player 7 alone, so I can't imagine it effecting 6.3. Yes, after the install WiMP 7 for OS X disappeared, but that was the point wasn't it? I never followed the debate about 6.3 having advantages over 7.1, so I can't comment there.

    As has been pointed out by others, the Mactopia site still lists the previous (7.1) version, so you should at least be able to return to that. I don't know where you can find 6.3 (if that's what you really need), but here's the answer to the parent question:
    Windows Media Player for Mac OS X
    WindowsMediaInstaller.hqx
    Windows Media Player 7.1 for Mac
    WMPlayer7_1_EN.hqx

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  11. Re:Avoid WMP altogether.. by BlackBolt · · Score: 2, Informative

    MPlayer RULES! I just recommended it to my friend this weekend - he wanted something that could play pretty much everything he threw at it and save him from the jumbled mess that is windows media player. The only problem is that the Win32 version I got my friend uses keyboard controls for everything (FF, REV, etc.) which sucks. The OSX version has a much nicer GUI -- ie, it actually HAS a GUI.