Slashdot Mirror


China Outlines Moon Project Goals

Kulic writes "SpaceDaily.com is reporting that China has announced 4 scientific goals for their Moon project. There are three general goals - orbiting the Moon, docking spacecraft with one another in lunar orbit, and returning moon rock samples to Earth. Each step is outlined, with a detailed description of what they hope to accomplish during the orbiting stage. It looks like China is serious about their space program, and is taking an incremental approach."

20 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Go for it! by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's good to see another nation making a dedicated push towards space exploration. Perhaps it will help redirect US endeavors in that direction as well - at the very least, it's a good way to boost high tech education and business in the US, which is struggling in the face of global competition (i.e. software & IT outsourcing).

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  2. Wha? by Erwos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "It looks like China is serious about their space program, and is taking an incremental approach."

    Is this opposed to, say, the "do it all at once" approach?

    The Chinese have put a man into orbit. That's a great success for them, considering there ain't too many other countries that have done it. But just assuming that, hey, it's a short trip to the moon is naive. There's no way they would have been able to take another flight straight to the moon, if only for lack of experience.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  3. Re:Profit by vartvart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    to quote The Economist magazine;

    "Congratulations China, no need for aid right?"

  4. Foreign Aid by Dr_Emory · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Economist recently pointed out that China still recieved huge wads of international aid (premium content, no link, sorry). Sending men to the moon is a noble goal, but maybe it's something they ought to do on their own nickel.

    1. Re:Foreign Aid by cybercuzco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China doesnt need foriegn Aid. The total US budget for forieggn aid is like 13 billion dollars. The US trade defecit with china is about 115 dollars. Thats 115 biullion dollars that go to build new chinese factories, start new chinese industries and go into chinese taxes. Chinas military spending is about 50 billion dollars a year. So youre right, it is being done thgouth international "aid" but that aid is in the form of people voluntarily buying products made by chinese companies.

      --

  5. To Americans and others by L-s-L69 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Stop slagging china off for been "30 years too late". The US was driven to the moon in an attempt to show off superier tech to the russians. China on the other hand has a series of plans leading to mining the moon, or even settling on it.

    Whos knows maybe moonbases will become a relatity in my lifetime.

    1. Re:To Americans and others by spinkham · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You apparently don't know much about China. China is a socialist country much like th USSR was. In China, everything is about appearances. For example, when the Olympic committee came to Bejing to see if it was a suitable sight for the olympics, the Chinese government ordered every factory in the area shut down for a week beforehand so that the usually horrid smog would die down.
      My in-laws live in Bejing at the moment, and the propaganda there is interesting... There's only one channel in English, and it's a government channel telling how wonderful China is.
      The Chinese government blocks CNN, MSNBC, and most all western media. All news comes through the government sponsered tv channels, or through the "rumor train". We often know about things going on over there before they do.
      When we were at war in Iraq there was nothing on but sad music and pictures of wounded children...
      In China, you are told what school you will go to, what you will study, where you will live, and until recently, where you will work. You need a permit to be able to move to a city, and many families(like husbands and wives families) are split up because they can't both get permits to live in the same place.
      Throughout school they have a class they call Propaganda(well, not really, but an equivelant word in Chinese) that is just that, all about how bad the west is and how wonderful China is. How Chinese medicine is so wonderful and western medicine is bad(My inlaws masters biology students don't really think that viruses and germs cause disease, and that if they opened their windows to let the Chi flow and excercised, they wouldn't get SARS. Most of them contuined to eat from a common bowl because it's the chinese way, and their strong chi would keep them from getting sick...)
      China is building the worlds largest ferris wheel and going to the moon purely to make themselves look good. If they can set up a moon base it won't be primarily to make money, though I'm sure they wouldn't mind that. It would be much like our space race, to prove that we're better then them.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
  6. Re:Odd... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While it is true that humanity as a whole has previous experince in landing on another rock in the solar system, the chinese do not. And it's more sensible to do it the first time in relative proximity to earth, where communications are nearly instantinious and home is just four days away, rahter than to go to Mars and hope everything works out just like they did in the simulator.



    AFAIK, the chinese are plannin g a spacestation as well as a manned moonmission, and I got a hunch they won't stop there. So far all of their achivments can be dismissed as something other nations already has done - but as far as I can understand the mindset that drives the chinese spaceprograme (which appears to be close to the mindset that drove the early soviet and US spaceprogrames), they 'need' to do something spectaluar that no-one has done before.



    A permanet moonbase might suit this criteria, or a manned mission to Mars... but they need to learn to walk before they can run.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  7. new space race please by kippy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is exactly what NASA needs right now. A kick in their complacent, idle butts. As you can read in my previous post ,I think that NASA needs to have a similar goal-oriented approach to their mission. Perhaps if we get shown up by what had been a second world country, we will get back into the Apollo mindset again.

  8. Go China :) For humanity! by POds · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >>It looks like China is serious about their space
    >>program, and is taking an incremental approach

    Well, at least someone is. Also incase anyone hasnt noticed :) China will be the most, without a doubt the most wealthy nation by far. Im not going to speculate when this happens, but im sure they're already only second to the all mighty USA. So looks like they'll have enough money to keep it going into the future.

    Exciting stuff!

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  9. Re:Odd... by Glock27 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They're about 36 years late... seems like the money would be better spent on a Mars mission or even the space station.

    That's what the Moon is - a very large space station in orbit 240,000 miles above the Earth.

    It receives unlimited, very strong, solar energy, and provides plenty of raw materials. It also provides unlimited, very high quality industrial vacuum, and is an ideal site for optical and radio astronomy. It is also a fine launch pad for interplanetary traffic, since it has only 1/6 the gravity of Earth and no atmosphere.

    Granted, it may be lacking in certain resources, but the recent discovery of 100,000,000 tons of water near the lunar South Pole certainly casts things in a new light. A sustainable colony is most likely feasible.

    If we weren't mired down in massive red tape and environmental regulations, perhaps private enterprise here in the West could take a shot at competing with the Chinese government. I'm pretty sure space flight is about to become commercially viable, especially if there is a breakthrough or two. Scramjets and detonation based engines are two possibilities.

    We also need a non-crewed heavy lifter that'll take the "freight into space cheap" crown. Then big lunar and interplanetary ships can be constructed in orbit.

    Safe, high performance power (fission, fusion or antimatter) needs to become a reality soon for interplanetary travel. That will be the revolution in the 21st century to rival flight in the 20th.

    We'll see if we can get more than a million people into space a year by 2100...well probably not me personally... ;-)

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  10. Rare metals? by MrKinkade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, I'm not a scientist, but what are the chances that the moon habours a great deal of precious metals or minerals? I'm certain there's going to be a lot of abundant metals like iron etc but what about the stuff that could add incentive to the high cost of going to the moon and bringing the stuff back? If there was enough of it you could get some commerical interest from LUNAR PROSPECTORS.

    I don't know how easy it would be to get a pack mule into a space suit though.

  11. Who Owns the Mineral Right? by Black-Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there some kind of international agreement dictating ownership? Or is this like the new world - a first-come, first-served queue?

  12. More info? by dontbgay · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but it seems as if the Chinese government is looking to develop a more cost effective way of travelling in space as well.

    *snip*Here the satellite probes solar energetic particles, plasma in solar wind, and the interaction between the solar wind and the moon and between the tail of the magnetic field of the earth and the moon.*/snip*

    I'm no rocket scientist but there's a few here. Care to take a stab at this?

    --
    Sig not found.
  13. Stop being so myopic and xenophobic... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I could level equal charges against the US. 13,000+ shot dead every year, god knows how many more killed on the roads, a welfare system that pales into comparison compared to that of any other developed world nation, a crumbling school system that's badly underfunded yet the US finds it more important to wage war half way around the world.

    Why spend billions fighting a war? If Saddam was the problem then why not just put a $1 billion bounty on his head? It would have been cheaper and it probably would have been more successful.

    Does the US really need tens of thousands of nuclear warheads? Wouldn't a few hundred be enough? Just how many $1.3 billion B-2 stealth bombers does the USAF need? They're going to get 20, but the original order was 144... Even so, wouldn't that money be better spent elsewhere?

    See? I can construct a similar myopic argument detailing why money shouldn't be spent on grand endeavours for just about any nation in the world. Just because you think that there's no benefit to the average Chinese citizen in this lunar programme that doesn't make it so. If I recall correctly, people made the same argument about the NASA Apollo missions, and the scientific acheivements of Apollo and the success of its commercial spin-offs are still benefitting us today.

    Something tells me if this new endeavour came from NASA rather than China you'd be the first to jump on the "about time too" bandwagon. Stop being so damn xenophobic.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Stop being so myopic and xenophobic... by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Begin Patriotic Rant...

      god knows how many more killed on the roads

      Actually, Germany beats us on a per capita basis of number of people killed on the roadways. Guess the autobahns aren't such a good idea after all?

      a welfare system that pales into comparison compared to that of any other developed world nation

      I would respond to that in two ways:

      1) The Europeans can afford the luxury of a welfare state, because they haven't had to defend themselves for the last 50 years. How much more of their GDP would have gone into the armed forces if the US had pulled out of NATO when the Russians had 5,000 tanks and 3,000,000 troops in Eastern Europe?
      2) There are ample opportunities for anyone in America to "make it". We don't need a welfare state. Most Americans don't want a welfare state. Your doing exactly what you accuse us of doing -- applying your own standards and morals to our country.

      a crumbling school system that's badly underfunded yet the US finds it more important to wage war half way around the world

      And yet with our "crumbling school system" we still lead the World with advances in all sorts of Sciences. World leaders come to our country for major medical procedures because they don't trust their own medical systems. Foreign students come to our universities in droves.

      Does the US really need tens of thousands of nuclear warheads?

      We don't have "tens of thousands" of nuclear warheads anymore. After the new SALT comes into effect we will have a couple hundred Minutemen III ICBMs (without MIRVs mind you), and our Ohio-class subs as our sole nuclear deterrent. Said deterrent prevented the Russians from overrunning Europe and kept the peace for 50 years. If it wasn't for the advent of Nuclear Weapons there surely would have been a World War III over Eastern Europe, Korea, Vietnam... take your pick.

      Something tells me if this new endeavour came from NASA rather than China you'd be the first to jump on the "about time too" bandwagon. Stop being so damn xenophobic.

      Who said anything about xenophobia here? Blindly parsing the Chinese space ambitions as good is foolhardy. Their space program is highly secretive and controlled by the military. While I'm not going to say "They should be spending the money elsewhere", because (unlike you) I don't assume to tell other countries how they should spend their money, you'd be a fool as a Westerner living in a Democracy to think that Communist China going into space is a "Good Thing" (tm). The only good that could come out of this is inspiring Americans to get back into the space race. Personally I was hoping the Chinese rocket would blow up on the launchpad.

      Lastly, (and this will get me modded down for sure, but who cares?) take your Anti-Americanism and shove it up the highest part of your ass. While I won't defend everything my country does (it should be noted that I loathe our current administration), the good that we have done (Marshall Plan, WW2, Apollo Program, liberated Kuwait, helped form the UN, Berlin Airlift, Panama Canal) FAR outweighs the bad (setting up Latin America dictatorships, supporting the Shah). Would you rather have a Democratic United States as your neighbor or a communist China? If you said "China", then ask some people in Tibet how well having them for a neighbor has worked out.

      End patriotic rant.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  14. how ironic, and foretelling. by *weasel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the romanized spelling of their mission is simply 'change'. (Chang'e I)

    guess we oughta get used to the idea that only china has something left to prove politically in space, and the resources to do it.

    combine their drive, resources, and that they learned from the US situation and are sticking with proven technology specifically designed for the mission at hand -- and China will either meltdown or raise the bar outside our atmosphere.

    it's gonna be a different world when you have to learn Mandarin to vacation on the moon.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:how ironic, and foretelling. by zhenlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Chang'e is the name of a princess, who, according to Chinese legend, lives on the moon with a pet rabbit - having jumped there after consuming the immortality potion, and obviously trying to escape the wrath of an angry husband.

      And now, the ship that will enable the Chinese to get to the Moon is named in her (mythical) honour... It isn't ironic - it's poetic.

  15. Re:Odd... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahem, we cant even get our USA asses to the moon anymore.

    i'd say that with-in 2 years that china will be much farther ahead of the USA in space that it will be silly.

    Hell if they figure out a way to launch sattelites cheaper than NASA and the EU maybe it will be a way to finally get the powers that be off their asses and actually do something in regards to the space program.

    Go China! make the dirt cheap access to space a reality, just like they did with computers.

    (If your moherboard,processor and ram were made in the states, we would be paying SGI and SUN prices for the low end stuff...)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  16. Re:As usual... by z01d · · Score: 2, Interesting


    It's working on its own problems right now.

    What do you know?!

    Those dictators put only 2% of the GNP in education, (you can compare the number with Canada or even India), and hundreds of millions people are starved there, and they can not even commit suicide, because that is illegal!

    Let me tell you something: China's own problem is the Evil CCP. The whole moon thing is, like Slave Society's Great Pyramid: build on others' death -- those you don't fscking know, and you don't fscking care.