Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Simpsons, Buyouts, Droid

Slashback tonight with another notch up for Virginia Tech's Big Mac, another downloadable robot design for the Mini-ITX crowd, updates (both in the negative) regarding two recently speculated-upon business mergers, and more. Read on for the details.

Shooting down those trial balloons. Glitch Tybalt writes with an update to the report that German ISP T-Online might acquire AOL: "This just in from The Register: apparently the buyout wasn't really going to be a buyout, only 70%, and there haven't been any confirmed reports on this. One spokesman for T-Online said '[Such a deal] is more unlikely than likely,'"

On a similar note, gletham writes "A flurry of reports [like this one] over the past day indicated that Nokia was talking with Psion and was seeking to buy the company. This latest piece from Reuters confirms that the topic was merely a rumor and speculation gone rampant. Mind you, with Psion's stock jumping 10% and discussion on Nokia lists and forums quite brisk, you can't help but speculate that Nokia may in fact consider this in the future. The timing is very good, particularly considering Motorola's recent selloff of Symbian ownership. I can't wait to here an official report from Nokia on this one! If all works out, we may even witness a rebirth of the Psion handheld using Series 90!"

Hey, maybe they just hadn't thought of it yet ... wo1verin3 writes "Previously reported was that Fox News Considered Suing Fox's 'The Simpsons' for using a news ticker spoofing the news service. Apparently this was only satire and an apology has been issued.

'Nonetheless, "The Simpsons" (the show, not the characters) issued an apology yesterday: "Matt was being satirical and certainly there was never any issue between the show and Fox News. We regret any confusion.'"

At this rate, it'll be #1 by March! An anonymous reader writes "According to the latest round of leaked information to reach The Register, the Virginia Tech Big Mac has reached 10.28 teraflops. A solid #3 win, 'This places it behind the 5,120 processor Earth Simulator system - 35.9 teraflops - and the 8,160 processor ASCI Q system - 13.8 teraflops.'"

Hold tight, though: Elysdir points to a AP article, pointing out that "the Top 500 list will be officially announced Nov. 18, so it's not clear to me whether the #3 ranking is official or not."

A Droid You Can Build From Downloadable Plans. In this article, LinuxDevices checks out OAP, an open source droid. OAP shares the same VIA Mini-ITX mainboard as the VIA-Roboteq "PC-bot" featured in an earlier Slashdot story, but OAP's project goals seem a little more ambitious. According to the FAQ, OAP will eventually be able to 'Read your favourite news web pages or blogs aloud to you.' A personal droid that reads Slashdot aloud to you -- what more could you ask for?"

(A girlfriend?)

201 comments

  1. Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Uh, excuse me but ALL these stories have been posted before. (I would look up the links but I'm too lazy). Slashdot editors have hit a new all-time low with this one... and you guys are actually paying for this stuff?? Please.

    1. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your posting was certainly not a dupe, because I don't remember that I've ever read such a joke of a joke.

    2. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke, dumbfuck. It was sort of like this 3rd Rock quote:

      "This man is a plagarist! Every single word this man has written has been published before! I present to you... the DICTIONARY!" (not verbatim.)

    3. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it.

    4. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little tip, when defending against accusations of being a mouth-breathing troglodyte, don't quote 3rd Rock.

    5. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by darkpurpleblob · · Score: 5, Funny
      The article was worth it if for only the comment at the end of the last story:
      A personal droid that reads Slashdot aloud to you -- what more could you ask for?

      (A girlfriend?)

    6. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dicshun4ry?! Taht doesn't alppy 4 wheen U read teh Slarshdort!!1!!1! LOLOOOLOLOLOLOLLOOTFLOL

    7. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It's good to see the editors get a slam in. It lets us know they do read the submissions, at least occasionally. ;)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Repost, dupe, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called slashback, dipshit. That's when they go over stories that have already been posted, and make updates to the posts to give further information.

  2. Stupid Fox news by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you can't handle people poking a little fun at you, you're in the wrong business!

    If you're in the public view, you're going to have people that want to poke fun at you. if a show as insanely popular as the Simpsons is making fun of you, I'd say it's a good thing.

    1. Re:Stupid Fox news by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 0, Troll

      In communist Russia, the artical reads you!

    2. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the spelling checks you! Dumb FUCK!

    3. Re:Stupid Fox news by Lshmael · · Score: 1

      Of course, when that show runs on your network, it is not a good thing.

    4. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Russia, the Soviets fuck you dumb!

    5. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you can't handle reading the friggin' article, you're posting on the right website!

    6. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckin' dumb soviets..

    7. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten. The. Fuck. Up. Smile.

    8. Re:Stupid Fox news by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Ya, but Rupert Murdoch and the gang are fairly die hard conservatives... and the folks that write the Simpsons are quite obviously the complete opposite.

      I'm not surprised to see stuff like this happen.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    9. Re:Stupid Fox news by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, man. The Simpsons and Fox News are owned by the SAME CORPORATION!

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    10. Re:Stupid Fox news by straybullets · · Score: 1


      > are owned by the SAME CORPORATION!
      i don't think so : fox news just pays for the right to broadcast and stuff like that , but the characters are a property of matt groening. And the team that make the cartoon is an independant company as well. Or something like that.

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    11. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is, Faux is so goofy that millions took the idea they'd sue The Simpsons seriously. It seemed imminently possible.

    12. Re:Stupid Fox news by caseydk · · Score: 1

      RTFA. Matt Groening lied (says it was a joke).

      The threat of a lawsuit never happened.

      Check out the writers sometime. They are across the political and religious spectrum.

    13. Re:Stupid Fox news by edoug · · Score: 1

      Come on, how can this be offtopic???? The slashback specifically talked about the Simpons/Fox News comment....Jeez...

      --
      meh.
    14. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's off topic because they were saying that the original story was WRONG, doofus. Matt Groenig apologized for saying that Fox News was going to sue. That was a joke!! Okay? Do we understand now? I know that sarcasm is wasted on the foolish, but you people need to learn to read.

    15. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. That's the beauty of the joke. Groenig and company have been making fun of fox for years, but this one was one of their best.

    16. Re:Stupid Fox news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to love it that most rich conservatives will support mass entertainment that compromises their political beliefs, so long as it continues to make them richer.

  3. Great! by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 3, Funny
    >> According to the latest round of leaked information to reach The Register, the Virginia Tech Big Mac has reached 10.28 teraflops. A solid #3 win, 'This places it behind the 5,120 processor Earth Simulator system - 35.9 teraflops - and the 8,160 processor ASCI Q system - 13.8 teraflops.

    Now I can have the worlds most powerful "Hello World" ever!

    --
    Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    1. Re:Great! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      I thought it was supposed to run Duke Nukem Forever?

    2. Re:Great! by imac.usr · · Score: 4, Funny
      Now I can have the worlds most powerful "Hello World" ever!

      And with the distributed build system built-in, think of how much compile time you'll save!

      --
      I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
    3. Re:Great! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1


      Here I am, brain the size of a planet and they ask me to do simple stdout processing. Call that job satisfaction? 'Cos I don't.

      Always liked Marvin...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:Great! by back_pages · · Score: 2, Funny
      This is a direct quote from a professor of computer science at Virginia Tech in an email sent to me.

      I'm sorry, but I don't know what a "Hello, World" program is, so I don't get the joke/point. This particular greeting must be something common to your generation.

      Thank goodness that he is not responsible for the supercomputer, hm?

    5. Re:Great! by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you're still 25.6 teraflops short of "Hello, Simulated Earth!"

    6. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it runs it so fast that it becomes Duke Nukem 15 minutes.

    7. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but with GCC 3.5, the compile time will STILL be ten minutes!

      TDz.

    8. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking too small! It's so fast you can go with all caps! "HELLO WORLD!"

    9. Re:Great! by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

      Soon to be seen at Mac World San Francisco:
      Big Mac does Photoshop benchmark in 0.0001 seconds. G5 retains "fastest PC on the planet" title.

      Seriously, Apple ought to milk this Big Mac supercomputer for all the good PR they can.

      - Jasen.

  4. Fox who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Previously reported was that Fox News Considered Suing Fox's 'The Simpsons' for using a news ticker spoofing the news service. Apparently this was only satire and an apology has been issued.

    I live in the UK, and until I started watching The Simpsons, I had never even heard of Fox. Advertisers would pay good money for this sort of publicity.

    Sueing them? Only in America!

    1. Re:Fox who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be surprised to find out then, that the BBC doesn't make "The Simpsons," and that Fox (one of America's largest TV networks) owns and funds the creation of "The Simpsons."

    2. Re:Fox who? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      20th Century Fox is only one of the largest media conglomerates in the world. And ironically, the Fox TV network owes its very existence to "The Simpsons" which along with "Married, With Children" were about the only highly rated shows it had for the first 5 years.

      Fox News has been around for several years and is now beating CNN's pants off. This might have something to do with CNN's complete lack of credibility in the last few years, but can also probably be attributed to Fox News politically right slant (at least in contrast to the other TV news outlets...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Fox who? by isaac · · Score: 1
      I live in the UK, and until I started watching The Simpsons, I had never even heard of Fox. Advertisers would pay good money for this sort of publicity.


      You only think you've never heard of Fox. It's just the American face of News Corporation, which owns BSkyB (and Sky-everything-else) and a hefty chunk of your newspapers.

      Over here they own a few papers, a few dozen cable/satellite channels with Fox branding, the Fox broadcast TV network (whither the Simpsons), and DirecTV, the leading satellite broadcaster.

      Same scenario, same right-wing bias, different names.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    4. Re:Fox who? by D+iz+a+n+k+Meister · · Score: 1

      . . . attributed to Fox News politically right slant

      So what your saying is being politically right is now politically correct?

      --

      He painted a unicorn in outer space. I'm askin' ya, what's it breathin'?
    5. Re:Fox who? by bfree · · Score: 1

      If you'd said that he might be surprised to discover the sky doesn't make "The Simpsons" then you might have actually had a semi meaningful post. Sky (yet another Murdoch company) launched and built it's network in the UK based on a diet of Simpsons and Premiership football. I wouldn't be surprised if a significant percentage of UK viewers believes Sky owns and funds "The Simpsons", and as Fox and Sky are both Murdoch perhaps they'd be right!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    6. Re:Fox who? by donutello · · Score: 1

      You only think you've never heard of Fox. It's just the American face of News Corporation, which owns BSkyB (and Sky-everything-else) and a hefty chunk of your newspapers.

      Over here they own a few papers, a few dozen cable/satellite channels with Fox branding, the Fox broadcast TV network (whither the Simpsons), and DirecTV, the leading satellite broadcaster.


      For a second there I thought you knew what you were talking about. Unfortunately, you don't.

      Same scenario, same right-wing bias, different names.

      Rupert Murdoch also owns Star TV in Asia which is happily leftist.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    7. Re:Fox who? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I think he's saying that the blatent right-wing bias appeals more to mainstream America...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:Fox who? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm biased but I don't find Fox as blatantly right-wing and Time Magazine, the Washington Post, CBS News or CNN are blatantly left-wing. The biggest thing I get tired of on Fox is the undue attention to pointless, non-newsworthy stuff like the Paris Hilton sex tape. I like O'Reilly even if he is a pompous ass, but I don't like Hannity. He's like the neighbors Scotty who barks all night at the trees. I disagree with Colmes 95% of the time but he's a much better debater. I also like MSNBC, particularly Chris Matthews.

      In any event, it's impossible to be human and not have a bias, the best bet is to follow many sources, including news magazines (particularly in-depth ones like "The Economist") and even the Internet.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    9. Re:Fox who? by Babbster · · Score: 1
      I think it has less to do with the right-ward slant and more to do with it being more entertaining to watch. CNN's most entertaining show is Larry King Live and he was tiresome to me back when he was on radio - [that jerk] O'Reilly on Fox beats King hands down in the entertainment department. Personally, I like Buchanan, Press, Matthews and Olberman (the MSNBC line-up), but I'm weird that way.

      Oh, and before I get the snot kicked out of me for equating interest in news programming with entertainment, I would point out that with one 24-hour news channel, entertainment can be secondary...with three 24-hour news channels (CNN, MSNBC and Fox) competing, you've got to have more than just a person with great hair reading off a TelePrompter. :)

    10. Re:Fox who? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I'm definately biased, and I find Time, Washington Post, CBS News, and CNN to be perfectly unbiased. In fact, CBS and CNN are a bit too conservative for my taste. Add Newsweek to your list, btw.

      Frankly, I see no point in trying to pretend that either side is biased or unbiased. Individuals are inherently biased, and even if an unbiased source did exist, we biased humans would never know it.

      That said, my problem with FOX News is that it represents the basest, most knee-jerk kind of conservatism. Both conservatives and liberals have that segment of their party that they're ashamed of. The conservatives have the unthinking knee-jerk faction, which simply holds conservative ideals because they don't know any better, and the liberals have the brainless faction, who have no grip of reality. I don't see CNN corrupted by the latter as much as FOX is corrupted by the former. I know a lot of very conservative people, and can debate with them at great length without losing my respect for them. Yet, watching FOX just makes me physically ill.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:Fox who? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with your assesments of Time, et al, but I will agree with you on one thing. When I debate and intelligent and thoughtful person I find I tend to agree with them more than disagree regardless of their political persuation. Clearly there are issues on which I would differ with almost anyone, but for people who can get beyond the knee-jerking and the slogan-chanting, common ground is easy to find, and disagreements can be respectful and educational.

      Unfortunately, thoughfulness and intelligence in debate are seldom found on TV, a little more on talk radio, but mostly in the printed word.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    12. Re:Fox who? by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      More likely it's just that Fox is able to capture the vast majority of the right leaning viewers, while the other networks, along with CNN, have to split up the left leaning viewers.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    13. Re:Fox who? by Maxwell309 · · Score: 1

      Media outlets are only as liberal as the conservative corporations that own them.

      --
      "DRM is like violence: if it doesn't work, use more."
    14. Re:Fox who? by Maxwell309 · · Score: 1

      Star TV and the Murdoch machine were liberal and anticommunist until Rupert got the opportunity to get into buisness with the Chinese Central Government. Rupert Murdoch is not a conservative, he just cares about his bottom line, which usually improves with conservative governance.

      --
      "DRM is like violence: if it doesn't work, use more."
    15. Re:Fox who? by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      I still don't get this. How is it impossible to be unbiased? Just because everybody hires former underwear models to do their news rather than journalists doesn't mean that journalists are mythical fairy creaures that never existed. We've had 600-odd years to figure this stuff out, and believe it or not, we actually came up with an entire field just for figuring out how to be unbiased. Many people have taken advantage of that knowledge, Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity have not.

      Anyway, I like Chris too. He's not exactly a quality news source, but it's funny when his producer invites Anne Coulter on as a "Constitutional scholar" and he just spends the whole show yelling at her for being an idiot.

    16. Re:Fox who? by babbage · · Score: 1
      Same scenario, same right-wing bias, different names.
      Rupert Murdoch also owns Star TV in Asia which is happily leftist.

      Maybe the lesson then is that the Murdoch empire is happy to get in bed with whatever power structure happens to be in charge in one of his markets.

      That's hardly encouraging.

    17. Re:Fox who? by Enry · · Score: 1

      How is it impossible to be unbiased?

      Each person interprets the news in their own way.
      Think the US Civil War". To the North, it's just the plain ol' "Civil War". To the South, it's often called "the war of Northern Aggression". Everyone puts their own spin on things.

      To say that someone like Peter Jennings is biased reading the news is absurd - he's just reading what's on the teleprompter. To say that someone like Peter Overby is biased is a bit closer because he's doing actual news reports. To say that someone like Ann Coulter is biased is pretty obvious - she has a known agenda, even if it appears to wander every now and then.

      The trick is to detect and compensate for the bias. Unfortunately, that requires you get your news from a variety of sources (Fox, NPR, AP wire reports, etc.) and see if out of all that mess, you can get the real story. Good thing we have the Internet.

    18. Re:Fox who? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Rupert Murdoch also owns Star TV in Asia which is happily leftist.

      Star TV is leftist? If you mean, "doesn't criticise the Chinse government", maybe. Other than that, look at their schedule. MTV, nature documentaries, sports, movies. All apolitical. The "news" includes Fox News -- leftist?

      StarTV is simply entertainment. You don't get permission to broadcast in Asia otherwise. That asshole Murdoch quickly pulled BBC news when China objected to its coverage.

    19. Re:Fox who? by ninewands · · Score: 1
      Maybe the lesson then is that the Murdoch empire is happy to get in bed with whatever power structure happens to be in charge in one of his markets.

      Maybe the lesson to be learned is that the Murdoch media empire will present any political viewpoint that will yield a profit in a particular market. Considering the corporate nature of the "News Business" nowadays would you expect anything less?
    20. Re:Fox who? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with your assesments of Time, et al, but I will agree with you on one thing.
      >>>>>>>>>>
      That's precisely my point. I see a lot of conservative principles as wrong on face value. I simply have different priorities than most conservatives, which makes my interpretation of various events totally different. For example, when I see someone one Fox talking about ignoring the UN, it annoys me. To me, internationalization is more important than getting the absolute best deal for the US. To somebody who has different priorities, those statements may seem perfectly understandible and self-evident. So what seems like balanced reporting to one side seems horrible biased to the other. There is no point in trying to pretend differently.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    21. Re:Fox who? by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      I am confident that most British people understand that Murdoch owns a massive array of intertwined media conglomerates, TV networks, newspapers and sports teams. They generally accept this on the proviso that he continues to deliver The Simpsons.

  5. time travel? by freedommatters · · Score: 1
    hmmm , maybe this is a really funny way to announce the discovery of a working time machine ?

  6. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree but does it help anyone?

    Fortress of Insanity
    Blogzine

  7. Hang on for a second... by herrvinny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OAP shares the same VIA Mini-ITX mainboard as the VIA-Roboteq "PC-bot" featured in an earlier Slashdot story

    But the robot in that /. story required a $500 motor controller. Forget that. Just give me the text to speech components and any important access components (i.e. web parsers, etc) and I forgo the motors. I can actually carry the computer from place to place and let it read me the stories wherever. Or mount the computer on an rc car and drive it around.

    Specific project goals include:[of the robot, from the sourceforge page]

    Design a coherent set of modular components (hardware and software) that conform to standards (where possible)

    Minimize cost to $1,500 - $2,000, about the cost of a good PC

    Develop a low-cost real-time vision system for use as the primary spatial sensor.

    Thousand dollars for a robot? No thanks.

    1. Re:Hang on for a second... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Or mount the computer on an rc car and drive it around.

      You should do this and get one of those incredibly fast gas-powered ones so you can get some hot hot doppler shift action going.

    2. Re:Hang on for a second... by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Thousand dollars for a robot? No thanks.

      Well how much are you prepared to pay? You cheap bastard!

    3. Re:Hang on for a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10 max for any robot that doesn't give a blowjob; $1000 minimum for one that does. OyOy!

    4. Re:Hang on for a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at last we have someone brave enough to explain the allure of eastern european babes.

    5. Re:Hang on for a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sometimes I weep for the human race.

      It's a crying shame that there are no naked babes on Mars to motivate dicks to fly there.

    6. Re:Hang on for a second... by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      I think the controller is kind of a rip-off. You could easily build something more functional for less than $500 by dealing with AutomationDirect. They sell AC drives and PLCs that will do the job perfectly.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    7. Re:Hang on for a second... by fferreres · · Score: 1

      It's true, I haven't read the article. But seems to me that there are a lot of web parsers available. Or you could just parse RSS feeds or make some simple regexps on your favorite website, and pipe stuff to festival.

      The guy that introduced me to Linux for a second try (I have done a first try with slackware in 1997, sucesfull, but I didn't know what to do with it at all, ie: no office suite, no games, no mozilla, etc) has his Licq linked to festival, as well as some other tailored alerts as well as selected email address, so that things where spoken aloud to him with a nice sexy (?) young woman for him. It was actually scary, but funny...

      I've tryed that recently with Gaim, to let me know when my girlfriend was online, and together with other packages, I was able to listen to what she type... over my cell phone :-)

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  8. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just persuade RealDoll to build a model with an enclosure for a controller, and it can be your robotic project and your girlfriend!

  9. Re:Nice backslap by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    I like The registers take on that...

    Biting the hand that feeds IT

    Karma dogma, mama, tata!!!!

  10. How to survive satire. by quinkin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Laugh.

    Don't sue, don't threaten, don't make yourself an international farce by responding in a knee-jerk litigous manner.

    Perhaps you could even learn from something (it is hard to satire a logical and reasonable issue)...

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
    1. Re:How to survive satire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT +1 HOMOSEXUAL!!!

      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    2. Re:How to survive satire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you can RTFA and see it was a satire...

      When libs dont like conservatives they turn
      to the 'Fairness Doctrine', a.k.a
      'If conservatives are poplular with the people, we shut them up' Doctrine.

    3. Re:How to survive satire. by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the idea of suing was just a rumor, anyway, and that the apology was merely issued for political reasons. Then again, I read the article... :)

    4. Re:How to survive satire. by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Why laugh when you can profit?

      I'm sure that's in the rules of acquisition somewhere...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  11. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he was talking about you (us), not the guy doing the project. Anyway, my wife would be pissed if I got a girlfriend.

  12. Come on... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Previously reported was that Fox News Considered Suing Fox's 'The Simpsons' for using a news ticker spoofing the news service. Apparently this was only satire and an apology has been issued.

    'Nonetheless, "The Simpsons" (the show, not the characters) issued an apology yesterday: "Matt was being satirical and certainly there was never any issue between the show and Fox News. We regret any confusion.'"


    Does anyone really believe that?

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
    1. Re:Come on... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I don't. I heard the interview, he sounded serious enough on that one.

    2. Re:Come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone really believe that?

      In case you can't wait, you can read everyone's answers in the original slashback story.

    3. Re:Come on... by helix400 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone really believe that?

      I hope your referring to Matt supposedly being satirical, and not Fox News supposedly suing the Simpsons.

      The way it appears, Matt Groening (either satircal, or flat out lying...and it appears he was just lying) claimed Fox News was going to sue him for that episode. Well, Fox News never claimed they would, and so Matt Groening and the Simpsons staff had to issue an apology.

      Ya ya, I know it's Slashdot, and everyone hates Fox News. But this appears to be a case where Fox News isn't to blame.

    4. Re: Come on... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > The way it appears, Matt Groening (either satircal, or flat out lying...and it appears he was just lying) claimed Fox News was going to sue him for that episode. Well, Fox News never claimed they would, and so Matt Groening and the Simpsons staff had to issue an apology.

      Still kind of funny... got in trouble with them for pretending to get in trouble with them.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Come on... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      Cause you know, there is no way people could influence internal politics and make him rescind his earlier (most likely accurate) statements.

      If nothing happened, why is there a rule against him doing it again? It's a bit suspicious. Such rules don't end up in corperate policies easily.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  13. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, talk about hitting a nerve. No question about it, you need a girlfriend.

  14. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Britain + Ireland, anyway, OAP means Old Age Pensioner. Not the image you want to associate with your robot?

  15. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, imagine a fat cow like your wife putting the smackdown on you! You better go gay, man... dealing with AIDS is a lot better than waking up every morning and feeling like you've just been rolled over by a steamroller.

  16. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    (a girlfriend?)

    RTFA. this crack was appended as a response to "what more could you ask for?"

    study english.

    you too, can see that this comment was not addressed to the OAP author(s).

  17. How about correcting Simpsons story on Front Page? by Nova+Express · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is like one of those newspaper stories that procliams COMMANDER TACO A MURDERER! on the front page in 48 point type, and then three days later there's a little correction in a box at the bottom of the last column on A-42 that reads "the story about Commander Taco being a murderer on the front page of Tuesdays Daily Slasher was in error. Another man named Commander Taco was convicted of penguin murder in American Samoa in 1969. The Slasher regrets the error."

    Or, to bring the point home more closely to the topic at hand, it's like when Homer got slimmed for Sexual Harassment by a TV tabloid, when all he really did was peel the gummy Venus DeMillo off his companion's ass, then when the station issued an apology, they ran it as one of hundreds flashing by on the screen at the end of the program.

    I guess Slashdot just isn't willing to admit that their dislike of Fox News lead them to post a false story, and now prevents them from posting a correction anywhere "above the virtual fold" for casual viewers to see without having to click the link...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  18. I want clarification! by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So Fox didn't threaten to sue itself, but is the new rule against fake news crawls real, or was it part of the joke as well?

    1. Re:I want clarification! by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      So Fox didn't threaten to sue itself, but is the new rule against fake news crawls real, or was it part of the joke as well?

      No, that's real. Actually the new rule is about forbidding talking about Fox's internal rules. But they'll deny that if you ask them about it, which proves it really, doesn't it?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:I want clarification! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorta like how mentioning the existence of that rumor in England is illegal, and so is mentioning the fact that it is illegal, and so is mentioning the fact that mentioning the fact that it...

    3. Re:I want clarification! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, the one about Prince Charles getting sucked off by a servant?

    4. Re:I want clarification! by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      He was what?

      Well I never. Do you believe it? What else are they saying about it?

      Man, I hate the censorship in the English press. I get as tired of Americans trotting out the old "our country is the best in the world" stuff as much as the next cheese-eating European Liberal, but I have to say that it would be rather nice to have a constitutional right to free speech over here.

    5. Re:I want clarification! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      but I have to say that it would be rather nice to have a constitutional right to free speech over here.

      Do you guys have a constitution yet? Or was that just propoganda in US schools? We're taught you're pretty much still running on the Magna Carta.

      If not, why not? No, really, I'm curious, why don't Brits realize the royals just drag down the country? Over here we just have Pop Stars, which, while terribly annoying, have no real influence and don't get taxpayers' money.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:I want clarification! by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      Well, firstly i have to say that my only qualification for answering this question is that I am British. It sounds as though you may well have a better understanding of some areas of British history than I do.
      However, as far as I understand it, we don't have a constitution - the Magna Carta must count as something else. A "Big Charter", perhaps? :) - and we certainly don't have constitutional rights. Those rights we do have are described as "residual rights" - that is, you have a right to do whatever hasn't been prohibited by law. Which sucks.
      And yeah, many Brits (myself included) do believe that the Royal Family are a drag on the country. However, you don't see this views widely aired because, among other things, it is illegal to advocate republicanism in print. I kid you not.

      So anyway, what's this about Charlie and the footman?

    7. Re:I want clarification! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      it is illegal to advocate republicanism in print. I kid you not.

      Christ, you people need a revolution. What's the holdup? :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  19. Simpsons apology... by bcolflesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    HAHA - Rupert "Nelson" Murdoch

    1. Re:Simpsons apology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't it be "HA-ha" ?

  20. Obligatory by Preach+the+Good+Word · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Homer:
    [reading screen] "To Start Press Any Key". Where's the ANY key? I see Esk ["ESC"], Catarl ["CTRL"], and Pig-Up ["PGUP"]. There doesn't seem to be any ANY key. Woo! All this computer hacking is making me thirsty. I think I'll order a TAB. [presses TAB key] Awp...no time for that now, the computer's starting.
    Blatanly stolen from Simpsons episode 3f05.

  21. Re:Nice backslap by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, that's why they go for tall skinny guys. Of course it's not a bad way to go....smothered by large, soft jubblies in your sleep. That's the risk some people take just to have a girlfriend.

    Oh, and until then you gotta be really nice to them...or they'll beat you up [they have to lift more than you weigh just to roll over] ...but /.er are already conditioned for that anyway...ha.

  22. Not a buyout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    70% ownership would be a controlling interest, effectively a buyout.

  23. How Fox news aims to survive satire by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    By being so ridiculous, satire is impossible.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  24. Try CNNNN by zambuka · · Score: 1
    Fox News Considered Suing Fox's 'The Simpsons' for using a news ticker spoofing the news service

    If they had problems with the simpsons parody imagine the fit they would have over this show
    1. Re:Try CNNNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that Fox News would even care.

    2. Re:Try CNNNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about ABCNNBCBS (from the Simpsons episode taking place in the future where Lisa is president)

  25. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just wait for the robots that are both!

    What? Don't you think that us geeks are capable of using science to solve our problems?

    My only question it is patented already, although you have to wonder if the patent examiner who gets the patent for "Device and method for sex robot capable of (insert most of kama sutra here)" will be able to stop giggling long enough to rubber stamp it...

  26. Re:How about correcting Simpsons story on Front Pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Slashdot just isn't willing to admit that their dislike of Fox News lead them to post a false story, and now prevents them from posting a correction anywhere "above the virtual fold" for casual viewers to see without having to click the link...

    Yeah, that's it Mulder. SlashDot and its partners the Freemasons are out to destroy the One True Source of information, namely Fox News.

    Alternately, this could just be old news. Remember how there was a correction (another article) on the front page of SlashDot (yes, the front page) one day after the original article? Remember? One day later? Front page?

    Nobody's out to get anyone here. It's just that the extended details of the cleanup are less interesting than the original leak.

  27. Re:How about correcting Simpsons story on Front Pa by meeotch · · Score: 3, Funny
    Oh, come on - can you blame them? I mean, who can pretend to think straight when faced with (Fox News anchor) Patti Ann Browne and her sweet... sweet can.

    mitch

  28. Re:How about correcting Simpsons story on Front Pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like one of those newspaper stories that procliams COMMANDER TACO A MURDERER! on the front page in 48 point type, and then three days later there's a little correction in a box at the bottom of the last column on A-42 that reads "the story about Commander Taco being a murderer on the front page of Tuesdays Daily Slasher was in error. Another man named Commander Taco was convicted of penguin murder in American Samoa in 1969. The Slasher regrets the error."

    You know, I think a more appropriate comparison would be from the Simpsons:

    Homer and Marge are asleep in their darkened bedroom when Lisa opens the door and pulls in Bart, who is laying still on a red wagon.

    Lisa: "Mom! Dad! Bart's dead!"

    Parents scream. Then Bart sits up.

    Bart: "That's right -- dead serious about going to 'Itchy & Scratchy Land.'"

    Karma whoring AC, y0!

  29. New Hairdo by zephc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Give the OAP a '70s bowl haircut, spray it silver and call it Twiggy

    *beedeebeedeebeedee* Hey, Buck, I'm open source!

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:New Hairdo by X-Nc · · Score: 1

      Actually his name was Twiki.

      --
      --
      If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
    2. Re:New Hairdo by zephc · · Score: 1

      what do you wanna do, get slapped with copyright violation?!?

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:New Hairdo by mikeboone · · Score: 1

      And Twiki is already open source. :)

  30. Oddly enough... by isomeme · · Score: 1

    ...when I picture applications for a personal droid, having it read /. to me is not the first one that springs to mind.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  31. .....A girlfriend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....reads Slashdot aloud to you -- what more could you ask for?

    A girlfriend?



    Hahahahaha!

    ha ha ha...



    [cries]

  32. What is this __SLASHLINK__ thing by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 1

    in the related links section?

  33. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently this was only satire and an apology has been issued

    Stating the amazingly obvious there about it being satire. What's more likely to have happened:

    The bastards at FAUX News have absolutely no sense of humor and wanted somebody from the Simpsons to be fired over this issue. Because disrupting the show would in the long term cost them more money than they make from it (finding a replacement writer or a new helmsman to direct the show, etc), they had the show issue an apology and banned them from making fun of their own news network ever again.

    Don't you just love the bland corporate conformity that is seeping into all areas of everything? Satirical programs are no longer allowed to do what they do best for fear of offending their corporate masters.

    They should have said "bite my shiny metal ass" and made fun of FAUX more often.

    1. Re:Translation: by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      You realize that faux is pronounced "foe" rather than "fox" right?

    2. Re:Translation: by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
      You realize that faux is pronounced "foe" rather than "fox" right?

      I'm sure the mispronunciation was merely a fox pas...

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    3. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "funny" that the parent was modded
      "informative".

    4. Re:Translation: by cactopus · · Score: 1

      You realize that faux is pronounced "foe" rather than "fox" right?

      That sir is a fox paw! -- (see an early episode of The Daily Show)

    5. Re:Translation: by pmz · · Score: 1


      Of course. Pronouncing it properly only intensifies the play on words.

  34. FoxNews by _aa_ · · Score: 0, Troll

    FoxNews must have a giant bug up its butt if it's willing to sue the people that saved it's own sister network over something that (if possible) is even more obviously satire than Al Franken's book title. I guess when you have the name "Fox" attached to the title of your company, you have to fight to the death for every litte bit of credibility you can get your hands on.

    Of course I get all my news from A Bare and Balanced News Source.

    1. Re:FoxNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...News Source."

      And that right there is the problem, folks. News Agencies are supposed to be selling an information service, not information as a product!

      Freakin' greedy bastiges....

    2. Re:FoxNews by valmont · · Score: 1


      aaaah. God bless nakednews.com.

      i'm guna sign up first chance i get.

  35. Re:How about correcting Simpsons story on Front Pa by gad_zuki! · · Score: 0

    >I guess Slashdot just isn't willing to admit that their dislike of Fox News lead them to post a false story

    Led to post a false story? Every media outlet was reporting the same thing. Nice conspiracy theory you've got there, but fark, metafilter, googlenews, etc were running the same story. The truly say part is after Fox's REAL intimidation lawsuit against Al Franken no one thought Fox suing the Simpsons was at all suspicious.

    Normally, Groening's joke would have been as a understood as one, but Fox's well-earned reputation as childish bullies diluted the satirical joke itself. Scary.

    Considering Fox's reputation is in the garbage can anyway, complaints regarding 'over the fold' are silly and if people can't be bothered to click on the Read More link then they deserve to wallow in ignorance. It isn't Taco's job to make a flash presentation and embed it on the front page becaus e a news channel you like was subjecedt to a prank.

  36. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why? she's got a boyfriend..

  37. Re:LIBERAL SON OR DAUGHTER OF A BITCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd vote republican, but they haven't fufilled their campaign promise of starting a forced breeding program!

  38. If you believe it... by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

    You should check out Akbar & Jeff's *DIPLOMACY HUT*!

  39. Uh-oh. I'm not buying that robot... by stienman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Red Hat Linux 9 was installed using mostly default installation options (you can download the ISO images for this GNU/Linux distribution free of charge from redhat.com). The exceptions to the default installation choices are listed here:
    * Custom (as opposed to Personal Desktop) installation type.
    * Automatic Partitioning.
    * System Clock uses UTC.
    * No Firewall.


    All your robot are belong to me, baby. Oh, I'm sorry, you didn't want to be woken up at 2am to learn about the new FDA approved, no prescription needed Viagara alternative?

    So sorry. Won't happen again. At least not for another hour...

    -Adam

  40. What more could I ask for? by rgmoore · · Score: 5, Funny
    A personal droid that reads Slashdot aloud to you -- what more could you ask for?

    Given that this is /., I'd think that the answer would be obvious:

    1. Natalie Portman, naked and petrified
    2. A bowl of hot grits poured down my pants
    3. A Beowulf cluster of personal droids that read Slashdot aloud to me
    4. ...
    5. Profit!
    6. In Soviet Russia, you read Slashdot aloud to your personal droid.
    --

    There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    1. Re:What more could I ask for? by CrackHappy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hm... I think you could combine a lot of these for more effective list:

      A beowulf cluster of natalie portman petrified droids covered in hot grits that reads Slashdot aloud

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    2. Re:What more could I ask for? by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      7. I am a personal robot, you insensitive clod!

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    3. Re:What more could I ask for? by ninewands · · Score: 0

      Now THIS is a +5 Funny response to the parent ... and me with no mod points!

    4. Re:What more could I ask for? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      6. In Soviet Russia, you read Slashdot aloud to your personal droid, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:What more could I ask for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. BSD is dying.

    6. Re:What more could I ask for? by maggard · · Score: 1
      Missed

      • I for one welcome our new personal droid overlords
      • All your droids belong to us
      and of course
      • Personal Droids (with a link to goatse.ex*)

      *address intentionially wrong

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    7. Re:What more could I ask for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Why is it that whenever the Natalie Portman droid stops by Slashdot, she ends up leaving covered in "hot grits"?

  41. Re:I'm glad Groening apologized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Oreilly in that lot.
    He is, after all, a gay locker pin-up boy.

  42. If it's good enough for Val Kilmer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The costs have to be kept low to free up capital for the forthcoming case mod .

  43. Heathkit Hero Robot by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen one of these in ages, but from memory I remember them using an 8088 processor.

    I think it would be a neat project to retrofit this old robot with a modern ITX mobo. Has anyone actually tried it?

    1. Re:Heathkit Hero Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I'm pretty sure the Hero was built around a 6809 or one of the other members of the 680x family.

  44. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just persuade RealDoll to build a model with an enclosure for a controller

    I don't know about you, but I don't want my make-believe girlfriend to have a joystick.

  45. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you can help him study as you go for your 'proper use of commas' test.

  46. Re:Good article Big Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti-abortion people must think we're really fucking stupid.

  47. A girlfriend? by *Avant* · · Score: 1

    -- what more could you ask for?" (A girlfriend?)
    Nah, governments would ban it straight away as it would negatively influence a population growth ;)

    --

    braindumps.info - well, braindumps in
  48. Re:Nice backslap by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    Yeah. It should have read, "A girlfriend...who reads Slashdot aloud to you." Because even those of us who actively deal with the fairer sex can agree, when she's softly trilling the copy to the latest SCO fiasco, we're in Geek Heaven.

    Especially if she's in a chainmail brasierre. Mmmm.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  49. Re:What more could I ask for? ... erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    7. I, for one, welcome our new linux robot slashdot reading overlords

  50. Questionable intent... by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    Is this another one of those posts that attempts to prove the point that moderators like the old, stale jokes by putting them all together?

    I know I've seen a few posts before, all of whom soon have replies from the author that it was an experiment to show that "mods are fools" or something like that.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  51. Putting the Simpson's apology in perspective... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    Matt was being satirical and certainly there was never any issue between the show and Fox News.

    Yeah, but it's funny, cuz it's true.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  52. Re:Read the Al Franken book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I lived in a free country just now.

    Don't worry, you still have the right to own a firearm. I mean, that's freedom enough, right? Thank goodness.

  53. Re:Uh-oh. I'm not buying that robot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "RMS and FSF are seeking power, not freedom."
    -Steve Dimse


    That from a guy who can't even spell the name of his alma mater. Either that, or he was suckered into getting a degree from a copy-cat diploma mill in malibu.

  54. Re:Nice backslap by ninewands · · Score: 1
    Especially if she's in a chainmail brasierre. Mmmm.

    Hmmmmm ... considering my fiancee, this is not a pretty mental image ... I'll stick to silk charmeuse, thank you very much ... and I KNOW from dealing with her that SHE prefers it my way. ;-)
  55. Re:Good article Big Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHA! It's a boy!

  56. Re:Nice backslap by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ok, the only thing i find more disturbing than the RealDoll site is this site that they're advertising. ok, maybe it's just funny, but, um, WTF?!

  57. here is the best of both worrlds by geekoid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "what more could you ask for?"

    (a girlfriend?)

    ha, take this.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  58. Re:How about correcting Simpsons story on Front Pa by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sure, as soon as Fox News retracts at least 1% of the lies they put forth.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  59. why it's here, not there :) by timothy · · Score: 1

    The reason we run Slashback is to collect corrections and updates, for instance the one here about M. Groenig / Simpsons / Fox News.

    If a story is still on the front page, we try to get a correction in there as an update. For stories that have rolled off the front page, though, more people will see the correction here than there, simply because readership for particular stories drops off a very steep cliff once they're in the Older Stories list instead of right there on the homepage.

    I don't watch Fox News enough to particularly like or dislike it, though I will admit to liking the Simpsons. It's nearly as good as Futurama.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  60. Formula 1 by rixstep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the Virginia Tech Big Mac has reached 10.28 teraflops

    This is a bit like Formula 1 - great PR for the company. Except Ferrari and the rest pay for their supercars.

  61. FOX Cartoon News by LuYu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Now Fox has a new rule that we can't do those little fake news crawls on the bottom of the screen in a cartoon because it might confuse the viewers into thinking it's real news," [Groening] said.

    Nonetheless, "The Simpsons" (the show, not the characters) issued an apology yesterday: "Matt was being satirical and certainly there was never any issue between the show and Fox News. We regret any confusion.'"
    Gee, I did not realize I was stupid enough to believe a news ticker on a humorous cartoon was real. I guess I am too stupid to know how stupid I am. However, it looks like censorship has come to my rescue again! No more confusing cartoons with real life for me. Thank you FOX.

    Might this not be FOX News' problem for issuing news that might be confused with a satyrical cartoon? Maybe FOX News' content is about as believeable as "Study: 92 per cent of Democrats are gay... JFK posthumously joins Republican Party... Oil slicks found to keep seals young, supple... Do Democrats Cause Cancer?" (from the Yahoo! article). Well, if they are anything like CNN, that sounds about right.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  62. Re:Nice backslap by Placido · · Score: 1

    I'll need to see your girlfriend in a chainmail brasserie to decide. Please send her with a return envelope to my address.

    Thanks.

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  63. New rule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now Fox has a new rule that we can't do those little fake news crawls on the bottom of the screen in a cartoon because it might confuse the viewers into thinking it's real news.

    People THAT confused should stay away from "The Simpsons" in the first place. It might change the way they see their american south.

  64. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got metal fever boy!

  65. DIS and TWX merge? Give me a break by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Do you really think that Bugs Bunny's company (CNN parent Time Warner) could buy out Mickey Mouse's company (ABC parent Disney) or vice versa? Not within the next Life Plus 70.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  66. It's the right's ally and the left's Faux by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Faux News is the foe of the left.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  67. "The Best Television News Program....Ever." by autechre · · Score: 1


    > I think it has less to do with the right-ward
    > slant and more to do with it being more
    > entertaining to watch.

    Perhaps that's why more people get their news from The Daily Show than the Fox News network. At least they make the line between news and fiction clear, and they're certainly the most entertaining. Anyone who sees it as just a comedy show probably doesn't understand South Park either. Oh sure, Savage is funny for about 15 minutes, but then an overwhelming sense of "AAAARRRGGH!" kicks in.

    http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi=20030505& s= douglas

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  68. Confused? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    If Fox News thinks people can't tell the difference between a cartoon and their news broadcast then either they think that their audience is incredibly stupid or they realize that Fox News is no different than a cartoon.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  69. This was different by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    Fox News' concern was that the channel is also called "Fox" and that seeing a news ticker like that of "Fox News" running at the bottom would make people believe there was a real connection.

    The normal Fox channel HAS run Fox News' news ticker in the past, particularly during the 9/11 attacks and also during the war with Iraq. So that was the reason behind the issue.

    I think if Groening had just run it by Fox News first, there wouldn't have been a problem.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:This was different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TROLL

  70. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it has a link to pr0n!

  71. Ample evidence for lawsuit by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

    If Fox really DID want to sue for things like this, there would be plenty of evidence to be brought to the stand:

    Simpsons swipes at Fox

    I wouldn't try to get out of jury duty for that case.

  72. Stupid Mods by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1

    how in the world is parent offtopic? he comments on fox and the simpsons. this is exactly ontopic.

  73. Do you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I, for one, well come our new beowulf cluster of natalie portman petrified droids covered in hot grits Overlords. And as an anonymous coward, would like to remind them I could be usefull for reading slashdot out loud to them in soviet russia.

  74. Re:Nice backslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apparently they do make them with joysticks if you change your mind :).

  75. Re:The Violation of Rob Malda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word.

    And your use of and correct spelling of "syphilictic" is an inspriation to us all.

  76. Republican shills moderated me first! by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    (ok, maybe my tone *was* a little flame-baitish but one wonders if the moderators had read the book before forming their opinion of my opinion... 8-)

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press