Slashdot Mirror


What's the Worst Job Posting You've Seen?

Kickstart70 asks: "Recently myself and a number of friends of mine who work or worked in IT jobs have been remarking on absolutely horrible job postings for low-level IT jobs paying small change. It seems the headhunters and employers are still wanting knowledge in everything, at least one degree but preferably two, and want to keep employees on minimal wages (in the job listing linked, the wage is in Canadian dollars). Is this common everywhere? What's the worst job posting you have seen?"

19 of 1,214 comments (clear)

  1. Requirements that end up in a checksum failure... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    The worst ones I've seen are ones that require you to have gone back in time in order to have enough experience with the software they want you to use:

    "Requirements: 5 years experience with Windows 2000..."

  2. Re:My Own by Nucleon500 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Worse than that?

    Finding out you're unqualified.

  3. Welcome to the 21st century by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you still have an insanely high-paying IT job, give thanks and keep saving. Chances are good that you won't have it much longer between offshore outsourcing and a whole ton of unemployed IT ppl willing to do your job for less $$$.

    Let's face it. IT salaries got way ahead of themselves in during the boom. Now the pendulum swings the other way

    Have you looked at what a teacher makes or any other number of degree-requiring professions? CAD$40k might sound sucky to you, but I'm betting there's a lot of unemployed IT ppl out there right now who'd take it in a snap.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Welcome to the 21st century by bladernr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If you still have an insanely high-paying IT job, give thanks and keep saving. Chances are good that you won't have it much longer between offshore outsourcing and a whole ton of unemployed IT ppl willing to do your job for less $$$.

      As an executive who out-sourced some work to India and also hires plenty of US talent, I can tell you that highly-skilled US programmers who understand the domain they are working in (health care, telecom, finance, etc) will still command top-dollar.

      Just today (yes, today), I had a major schedule slip that could cost the company millions over that cheap labor. In their defense, the requirement that was given to them was incorrect, and they did a superb job of implementing the system. However, a US based programmer with knowledge of the domain (telecom in this case) would have recognized the requirement as incorrect and would have implemented correct code anyway. As an aside, she said the Big-5 consultancies do a horrible job and providing people with domain expertise, in spite of claims to the contrary.

      Just this week I spent time with a fellow executive from a major ILEC. She told me that they are outsourcing Java work to India like there is no tommorow. However, highly-skilled programmers with true knowledge of the business are still paid as high as they ever were (which is my experience in my organization as well).

      If you want my advise, learn the industry you want to work in. Programming skills are cheap, I don't care how good you are. Business knowledge is still a damn rarity. Business knowledge and the ability to implement it in systems is almost impossible to find. That means it is paid well for.

      Oh yeah, most resumes I see from programmers who think they know the business don't know nearly as much as they think. Spend as much time learning the business as your programming skills, and I think you'll be fine.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  4. Job listing I want to see by nate+nice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Requirements: Creative, smart individual who finds delight in working with others and around others. Candidate should have an understanding of computational theory and application and be able to grasp new ideas quickly. Prospective employee should have skills in a couple programming languages as well as the ability to learn a new language or environment quickly. If you are right for this job you will be able to apply your knowledge, logic and intuition to the problems at hand. You enjoy solving problems and discovering new ways to do things. An engineering degree is preferred but not necessary. If you don't have an engineering degree you will be expected to demonstrate competency in math, logic and computer science theory. You will be paid accordingly to your abilities in the above listed requirements.

    Instead we see:
    Must have 10 years of programming in language A that has been around for 4 years. Most know X,Y,Z. We don't care if you can learn X,Y,Z or understand the theory behind X,Y,Z, you must know it because it is a nice buzz-word right now. Be prepared to unlearn X,Y,Z and learn G,H,J when they become the new buzzwords. We don't want you to think, we want you code!! code!! code!!

    But I digress.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  5. Mail room by faust2097 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw a posting for mail room personnel at CNet that said "must have 2 years previous corporate mail room experience". And it wasn't for managing the thing, it was just a nomal clerk position.

    Would you want to hire someone who was either a) so uncapable that working the mail room is the peak of their abilities or b) so ambition-free that they had multiple years of mailroom experience without advancing?

  6. Re:My Own by gmack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah.. When I quit my first job in montreal after the place took a direction other than what was on the job description(they wanted to do porn and I didn't) They posted a job asking for my qualifications but expected to about $12 CDN an hour.

    One day I'm overhearing the receptionist talking to a prospective sysadmin calling for my job "well sir.. before we process your resume.. do you have a problem with porn? how about animal porn? ohh well ok then. thanks anyways"

    Glad I left? yep! That place and Ralsky deserved each other.

  7. Re:Interesting requirements... by cbeaudry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have to take into consideration that 17-19$ canadian, for a level 1 tech support job, is actually a good offer.

    17-19$ Goes a long way in Edmonton (I beleive thats where the job is) compared to lets say Vancouver or Toronto where you'd need at least 25$/hour.

    You guys have to remember, you will have a better living standard with 17$/hour Canadian in Edmonton, than if your doing 30$/hour USD in Sillicon Valley.

  8. Real posting... by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 5, Funny
    This was a real posting to a job list a few months ago:

    > From: Jenny Richards [mailto:..........@yahoo.com]
    > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 11:11 AM
    > To: .........@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: [.......] Entry level programmer in Duluth, MN
    >
    > Location : Duluth, MN
    > Term : 1 year
    > Rate : $5.10 / hour
    >
    > Requirements:
    >
    > - 21+ years of J2EE Development.
    > - Fluent Sanskrit.
    > - PhD in Computer Science and 17th Century French Poetry.
    > - Must have had 4 or more products that sold 1,000,000 copies.
    > - Must be a member of the Mayflower Society.
    >
    > Locals to Duluth given preference.
    > All requirements are mandatory, so don't waste my time by sending my
    > your pathetic resume unless you're a perfect fit.

    It was real posting to a real job list, which I thought was very funny, but the poster got banned from the list for their sense of humor.

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  9. On-Call Outlook/Exchange Admin by BigRedFish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As soon as I see 'Administer Outlook/Exchange' and 'on-call 24/7', I don't care how much it pays.

    Besides, I don't have 5 years experience with 2K/XP. I don't know if they do that to weed out liars or what, but it's a big red flag to me that the employer is reality-challenged.

  10. More Experience than Possible by Eskarel · · Score: 5, Funny
    Worst I ever saw was sometime last spring looking for 5 years of experience with .NET. The fact that even the eduactional version which had come out a good year or so earlier than the commercial product had not yet been out for two years didn't seem to bother them.

    I'm not even entirely sure whether they had a version of VS .NET which would compile(as in the program not stuff it created) in the spring of 1998. Ahh well, such is lunacy.

  11. from what i've seen by nudicle · · Score: 5, Funny

    CmdrTaco does the worst job posting...

  12. My Job by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fine... this isn't a job posting, this is an actual description of my job duties, but I'll make it look like one:

    • Senior SQL Administrator/Programmer (PostgreSQL)
    • Senior Web Applications Developer (PHP). E-Commerce experience an asset.
    • Toolchain/Plugin Developer (C/C++). Develop PostgreSQL plugins and in-house applications.
    • Senior Network Administrator on a heterogeneous FreeBSD/Linux/WindowsXP environment. Must possess strong skills in server application deployment and windows interoperability. Must possess a background in firewall and network design.
    • BCS/BEE and/or 10+ years of proven software design experience.
    • Background in cryptography is an asset.
    • Must be willing to work overtime when necessary at 1x pay.

    Benefits Package: none, contract basis, terminatable at any time without severance package
    Pay: $14 Canadian/hour

    Wait a minute... what am I doing? Is anyone looking for a developer (or hardware engineer for that matter)?

  13. too true to be funny by jgarry · · Score: 5, Funny

    I posted this a while back, and some people thought it was too true to be funny. Others saw the humor.

    How to decode an Oracle DBA Want-Ad

    --
    Oracle and unix guy.
  14. College job listings were the worst by amuro98 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember looking for intern/co-op positions through my school's placement center.

    One year, a major computer hardware company came to campus looking ONLY for Ph.D students willing to do 3 month intern positions at minimum wage. Uh.... Turns out their HR department was a bit overzealous.

    Another firm was an IT contracting company. They came to campus looking for new grads with a bachelors in computer science or engineering, and 5 years IT experience... After the representative told the several people that they were wasting his time because they didn't have enough experience, he was escorted off campus and told never to return.

    I also recall a major financial institution wanted to hire CS students with 3 years of programming experience for the summer to - and I'm not making this up - *STAND INSIDE THE WALLS TO MAKE SURE THE NETWORK CABLES DIDN"T COME LOOSE OR BREAK*. The job was located in New York City, paid $5/hr, no assisted living, and you were *required* to live within 10 miles of the office. Oh yes, and you were also required to wear a suit at all times (though I have no idea how you were supposed to keep it clean standing inside crawlspaces all day long...)

    This company, too, was kicked off campus and told never to return.

  15. Re:Requirements that end up in a checksum failure. by tigga · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Requirements: 5 years experience with Windows 2000..."

    How about dogs years?

  16. Re:Lots of them here by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the Economist notes, executive compensation has gone up enormously while profits have not (see the graph at the bottom). This isn't to say that the average CEO doesn't work hard or have valuable skills. But there are lot of CEO's who are overpaid at the expense of both shareholders and workers.

  17. Re:fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. by bladernr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You only think you can tell. If you really know so much, you would have caught the spec error that you sent to India AND having fucked up, you could fix it yourself. Fuck you for your attitude and get to work, bitch.

    Interesting that you assume as an executive I don't know much about the IT systems I oversee. Would it suprise you to learn that I have published papers, articles, and a book on the subjects of distributed and parallel computing as well as object-oriented design theory? I rose through the ranks with technical skills, not business skills. I learned my business skills on the job.

    I have hired as many people since the "bubble-burst" in March 2000 in the US as in India (actually, probably a bit more in the US). Of course, that probably interfers with your world-view of my type. I have also spent no training money in India, but plenty in the US. I require my outsourcing company to provide trained people, but I hire "fresh" people and train them routinely. Of course, that probably interferes with your world-view of my type as well.

    You are free to think I am overpaid, but I can point to plenty of my fellow executives (defined as Director level and above by most business-experts) that make well less that highly-skilled software engineers.

    The spec error I missed was buried in hundreds of pages of specs, reviewed by teams of people. You may find this hard to believe, but I have never in my life seen a perfect spec. If you pick up great works of fine literature, you can easily find spelling and gramatical errors. The mistake that I missed was a single missing word.

    But, you obviously have a view that no one can change. I feel sorry for people who are so convinced they know everything.

    --
    Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  18. Re:Lots of them here by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't like the system.. work hard, take a few risks, and create a succesful company that YOU can run.

    Few CEOs "created" the successful company that they're now pillaging. If they did, they seldom have huge compensation because they already have a massive investment in the company (see Bill Gates - I don't hear anyone complaining about Bill's compensation). Where they were a founder and they're now pillaging, that's usually a sign that it's going down the toilet.

    So.. why not be the CEO then? If it's so easy to do, why isn't everyone doing it? Part of the skill isn't just in the work required to BE a CEO, but the fairly diverse skill set required to BECOME one in the first place.

    If only the world were so ideal. Your commentary is largely as realistic as telling a peasant in feudalist England that if being a Lord is so easy, why don't they just go and be one. Most CEOs are the spawn of powerful families with powerful connections and tremendous wealth - I think you'll find very few biographies that start in a poor ghetto.

    The reality is that most CEO's are truly good people. They work hard, and work to make their companies as good as possible.

    No one said that they aren't good people, but there is an element to human greed that comes into play when people are given such unchecked power. Read the book Animal Farm (or re-read it) as it's quite insightful.

    As far as CEOs working as hard as they can to make "their" company (sure it's their's...once their $10 million in "incentive" stock options vest so they can immediately divest them) successful, how about this: You, Mrs. CEO, have the right to put down as much of your family's hard earned money as you want, on the open market, to buy company shares. I know that you'll be so dedicated, so talented, so visionary, that this will be nothing less than an extraordinary investment as you steer the organization to success. We will all applaud you when you reap the rewards of good stewardship.

    Oh, what's that? You don't want to risk a penny of your money on this dump? You insist that we give you ridiculously under-priced stock options with no time-limitations? You insist that we line your contract with departure bonuses so no matter how much you screw up you're guaranteed a wealthy future regardless? You insist that there is rampant inbreeding among boards that you and all of your friends sit on, basically putting the wolves in charge of the hen house?

    Oooh, sounds like a deal to me.