Slashdot Mirror


What's the Worst Job Posting You've Seen?

Kickstart70 asks: "Recently myself and a number of friends of mine who work or worked in IT jobs have been remarking on absolutely horrible job postings for low-level IT jobs paying small change. It seems the headhunters and employers are still wanting knowledge in everything, at least one degree but preferably two, and want to keep employees on minimal wages (in the job listing linked, the wage is in Canadian dollars). Is this common everywhere? What's the worst job posting you have seen?"

67 of 1,214 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting requirements... by hendridm · · Score: 4, Funny

    > WINNT is nice to have.

    Don't do it! The organization is clearly run by crazies.

    My favorite part:

    Software List: Some or all would be preferred.

    I mean, damn, $17-$19 is pretty good for Help Desk, even if it is bilingual, but anyone who is familiar with all of the items on that list should make more than God himself. Of course, the poster of this probably works for Kelly Services anyway.

    1. Re:Interesting requirements... by cbeaudry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have to take into consideration that 17-19$ canadian, for a level 1 tech support job, is actually a good offer.

      17-19$ Goes a long way in Edmonton (I beleive thats where the job is) compared to lets say Vancouver or Toronto where you'd need at least 25$/hour.

      You guys have to remember, you will have a better living standard with 17$/hour Canadian in Edmonton, than if your doing 30$/hour USD in Sillicon Valley.

    2. Re:Interesting requirements... by cmallinson · · Score: 4, Informative
      But in Canada, being bilingual is normal. French and English speakers are common. And $17-$19 CAD is far above minimum wage.

      Although French-English bilingualism is common in the eastern provinces, it is rare in the west. Less than 7% in BC and Alberta. I would say this percentage is even smaller within the techie demographic.

    3. Re:Interesting requirements... by tigga · · Score: 3, Funny
      What is "bilingual French" anyway - two dialects of French?

      French French and Canadian French?

    4. Re:Interesting requirements... by Mattcelt · · Score: 3, Funny

      A good translator has real skills.

      You mean as opposed to most helpdesk techs? *grin*

      This is part of the problem here in the U.S. - companies hire lots of barely- or non-technical staff to handle the helpdesk, and they end up simply being call routers to the real techs, freeing those people from having to answer the phone.

      I've heard the helpdesk at one company I've worked with referred to as "Victoria's Secret".

      i.e., they're there purely for show and don't really support anything at all.

    5. Re:Interesting requirements... by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Translation of technical subjects is a great deal harder than general translation -- to do a good job, you need to know the technical jargon of both languages, and that usually means you need to have education in the field you're translating, as well as fluency in both languages.

      (remembering a translated manual referring to "water-sheep")

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  2. My Own by jhouserizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    The worst I've seen?

    The job posting to find the person who will replace me.

    1. Re:My Own by Nucleon500 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Worse than that?

      Finding out you're unqualified.

    2. Re:My Own by gmack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah.. When I quit my first job in montreal after the place took a direction other than what was on the job description(they wanted to do porn and I didn't) They posted a job asking for my qualifications but expected to about $12 CDN an hour.

      One day I'm overhearing the receptionist talking to a prospective sysadmin calling for my job "well sir.. before we process your resume.. do you have a problem with porn? how about animal porn? ohh well ok then. thanks anyways"

      Glad I left? yep! That place and Ralsky deserved each other.

  3. Who'd take that crappy job? by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    I count 163 things (well, wc -l counted it) on that list of things they want prospects to know. Obviously that job involves too much work and would interfere with reading /.

    Anyone that applies is obviously beyond geekdom and is to be pitied.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  4. Requirements that end up in a checksum failure... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    The worst ones I've seen are ones that require you to have gone back in time in order to have enough experience with the software they want you to use:

    "Requirements: 5 years experience with Windows 2000..."

  5. Several good sites by t0qer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fuck that job
    http://fuckthatjob.com/index.php

    E-mails of the suthibut family (doesn't seem to be updated)
    http://blog.postapocalypse.com/dave/dave suthibut.a sp

  6. Re:Requirements that end up in a checksum failure. by t0qer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm being nitpicky about your commment I know. But you're lack of understanding into the space time continium and the 4th dimension requires it.

    "Requirements: 5 years experience with Windows 2000..."


    Ok if one wanted 5 years of experience with win2k, they would need to go forward in time, to say 2005. Not backwards, because win2k was not created yet.

    Again my apologies for being a nitpick.

  7. Lots of them here by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Informative

    at Fuck That Job dot com ..but you know, there are so many of these postings that it's really not that funny anymore. It just reaffirms our belief that management really is trying to squeeze everything they can out of the pee-on workers.
    Gotta do something to give that CEO his bonus (studies show that executive compensation has gone up over 17% in the past year. Bah.)

    1. Re:Lots of them here by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As the Economist notes, executive compensation has gone up enormously while profits have not (see the graph at the bottom). This isn't to say that the average CEO doesn't work hard or have valuable skills. But there are lot of CEO's who are overpaid at the expense of both shareholders and workers.

    2. Re:Lots of them here by dvdeug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And it seems to me that life is a bit more complicated than you make it out to be.

      Enough to justify that the average CEO get a 1000 times in wages what his engineers get?

    3. Re:Lots of them here by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Between 1980 and 2000 the pay of the average American CEO has gone from 42x the average worker's pay, to 531x the average worker's pay (source: National Post Business - Nov. 2003). Somehow I'm not crying any tears that they're putting in, err, "18 hour days" on executive lunches, driving in the limo, doing golf, and getting "exotic" massages.

      But it is NOT easy. the competition is always there, working harder. Every time you have a great product someone else has just made it cheaper in Taiwan.

      Uh, wouldn't this justify paying every programmer, designer, tech writer, etc, exhorbinant pays because it's "damn hard" to make money? You carry this on with:

      As a tech guy I am not denying tech's value, But it seems to me we should NOT ever underestimate the incredible skills of the men and women that create our wealth and keep our companies running.

      This seriously leads me to believe that your post is nothing more than a troll. The people who "create wealth" are the people that design and create the profit centers. Secondly, CEOs of public companies seldom own even more than a marginal percentage of the company - they walked into the situation generally because all of their friends sit on the board. The current running of public companies is absolutely criminal.

      What extraordinary skill does the CEO bring to the table that justifies the unbelievable theft-from-within that is most CEO pays? Nothing justifies it. The reality is that a CEO position is indeed a necessary node on the org chart (a corporation needs someone at the steering wheel), but the person filling that role is not nearly as rare as is often made out, and usually is someone to basically tally the "votes" offered by all of the vice-presidents and directors to chart the course of the organization, and they most certainly don't need the sorts of incentives that they get dropped on their plate (531x the average workers pay? That is absolutely insane. Again - These people often didn't start the company, they have no loyalty to the company, and their only ownership is shares that they had to be GIVEN that they usually unload as quickly as they vest). Indeed, survey after survey have found that there is extremely little correlation (if any) between CEO pay and company performance.

    4. Re:Lots of them here by forkboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So "the job's really hard" is your justification for executive exploitation of workers, outsourcing of jobs, and bonuses and payraises for execs while the rest of the employees take pay cuts or get laid off? I call bullshit.

      CEOs aren't the only ones that work 18 hour days, and most of the others that DO work those kind of hours don't get to spend a good portion of them on the golf course or at lunch with business associates.

      But it seems to me we should NOT ever underestimate the incredible skills of the men and women that create our wealth and keep our companies running.

      I'm glad your boss inspires you with his skill and leadership, but most of these yahoos running companies are self-serving greedy pigs that do not give a god damn rat's ass about the company OR their employees' well-being. Else, you would see more company loyalty and less bitching. You're a CTO, you're at the top of the food chain, so your commentary about how valuable the CEO is to the people that bust their ASSES making money for companies like yours is meaningless. Put some time in the trenches of a company run by your typical night-school MBA executives and you'll understand what I mean. Until then, put your toys away, get back in your Escalade, and stfu.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    5. Re:Lots of them here by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't like the system.. work hard, take a few risks, and create a succesful company that YOU can run.

      Few CEOs "created" the successful company that they're now pillaging. If they did, they seldom have huge compensation because they already have a massive investment in the company (see Bill Gates - I don't hear anyone complaining about Bill's compensation). Where they were a founder and they're now pillaging, that's usually a sign that it's going down the toilet.

      So.. why not be the CEO then? If it's so easy to do, why isn't everyone doing it? Part of the skill isn't just in the work required to BE a CEO, but the fairly diverse skill set required to BECOME one in the first place.

      If only the world were so ideal. Your commentary is largely as realistic as telling a peasant in feudalist England that if being a Lord is so easy, why don't they just go and be one. Most CEOs are the spawn of powerful families with powerful connections and tremendous wealth - I think you'll find very few biographies that start in a poor ghetto.

      The reality is that most CEO's are truly good people. They work hard, and work to make their companies as good as possible.

      No one said that they aren't good people, but there is an element to human greed that comes into play when people are given such unchecked power. Read the book Animal Farm (or re-read it) as it's quite insightful.

      As far as CEOs working as hard as they can to make "their" company (sure it's their's...once their $10 million in "incentive" stock options vest so they can immediately divest them) successful, how about this: You, Mrs. CEO, have the right to put down as much of your family's hard earned money as you want, on the open market, to buy company shares. I know that you'll be so dedicated, so talented, so visionary, that this will be nothing less than an extraordinary investment as you steer the organization to success. We will all applaud you when you reap the rewards of good stewardship.

      Oh, what's that? You don't want to risk a penny of your money on this dump? You insist that we give you ridiculously under-priced stock options with no time-limitations? You insist that we line your contract with departure bonuses so no matter how much you screw up you're guaranteed a wealthy future regardless? You insist that there is rampant inbreeding among boards that you and all of your friends sit on, basically putting the wolves in charge of the hen house?

      Oooh, sounds like a deal to me.

    6. Re:Lots of them here by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As the other poster pointed out, this is not a free market.

      It is a generally pervasive social condition that CEOs have extremely high pay rates. Why? Corruption and cronyism at the top of a profitable company aren't enough to sink a company, and such things are extremely attractive. I'm, frankly, amazed at the general level of dishonesty and self-serving behavior exhibited by top-level folks I've seen.

      There are a couple of legitimate potential reasons to pay your CEO a lot of money. The first is that CEO candidates are extremely rare -- much like how a scientist in an extremely new and lucrative materials science field might make a healthy salary. I don't buy this. There are a ton of business graduates each year. A business degree is one of the easiest degrees to get. MBA work is absolutely trivial compared to something like a good hard science *undergrad* degree.

      Another possibility is that you are really getting a lot of quality for your money. Again, aside from connections (which ties back into the whole dishonest cronyism that I'm irritated about), I'm curious as to what kind of value a particular CEO candidate has that merits that he be paid thousands of times what his peers are paid. Given the degree to which markets are unpredictable and other factors, I have a hard time believing that past performance of companies a CEO has headed is a particularly strong indicator of future prediction. I'm *very* dubious that an expensive CEO (10 million a year) is better than a cheap CEO (100 thousand a year) plus 99 $100K/year engineers. That's an awful lot of additional product that you can provide.

      A final possibility is that a job is so onerous that one must pay a phenomenal sum to get someone to do it. I don't buy it. At a good-sized company, VPs and above are generally treated awfully well. Business life is an ongoing series of company-paid conventions at fancy hotels and resorts. You may need to be ready to respond 24/7 if there's a corporate disaster (think 9/11), but I suspect that there are a lot of folks that would be in at work in another 9/11. You do run the risk of being a corporate scapegoat ("we fixed our problems by switching our CEO"), but if you work for just four years at $10 million a year, you have an awfully comfortable retirement lined up.

      I suspect that most companies could get by with significantly less management than they have.

      Another issue to take into account -- in traditional business from a hundred years ago (say, manufacturing), the higher level employees tended to get promoted "from the ranks". Your plant manager was (roughly, and in ideal) the most competent of your middle managers, who were the most competent of your low-level managers, who were the most competent of your bottom-line workers. It made a lot of sense to maintain a pay hierarchy.

      That is not the case any more. You generally don't have any folks in the upper ranks (VP and up) that worked their way up from the bottom. There is no even approximation of a meritocracy. You hire business students to become execs. Furthermore, a big move has been made to make business a generic field -- business schools produce students that are interchangable between various companies. An exec generally does *not* have much domain knowledge about his company. He knows a set of business models and processes, how to interpret charts, and the like. As a result, the folks populating executive and engineering positions are drawn from entirely different stock. Execs have business degrees, engineers have engineering degrees. The legacy of a pay hierarchy still happens to live on, however, despite the fact that it requires much less rigorous education to become a business student, and that there is a larger available pool.

      All that being said, I (an engineer) don't care too much. If I wanted to earn more money, there are a lot of things that I could do that would improve my salary. However, I pretty much eat, drink, and live my field, on the job and off, so I'm pr

  8. CAD$38K ASP Programmer by thegrommit · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's less than US$29K. While one of the job requirements may be unique, it would be amusing to see how long a heterosexual male would last working there.

    1. Re:CAD$38K ASP Programmer by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet you get used to it. Two summers ago, I did web monkey work for a major university hospital, where I got look at up-close STD patient photos (in ultra high resolution taken with a 5MP camera, no less). After half a week, it wasn't such a big deal anymore. After awhile, if a friend showed up to visit me, I would point to a picture I have on the monitor, and say something like "hey look at those little mushrooms," forgetting about the outside world.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  9. Keep in mind by rob-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that as much as you hate your lousy IT job, there are 10 other people who would fill it given the chance. On top of that, I'd rather have a job in IT than working in, say, a meat processing plant. I'm grateful to have a job in IT, even if it sucks.

    1. Re:Keep in mind by Gord.ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that's the problem.

      When there's a perception that the employee should be thankful for any job they can get, the employer is free to screw them over.

      --
      The opinons expressed are those of the voices in the author's head and are not necessarily those of the author.
  10. Welcome to the 21st century by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you still have an insanely high-paying IT job, give thanks and keep saving. Chances are good that you won't have it much longer between offshore outsourcing and a whole ton of unemployed IT ppl willing to do your job for less $$$.

    Let's face it. IT salaries got way ahead of themselves in during the boom. Now the pendulum swings the other way

    Have you looked at what a teacher makes or any other number of degree-requiring professions? CAD$40k might sound sucky to you, but I'm betting there's a lot of unemployed IT ppl out there right now who'd take it in a snap.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Welcome to the 21st century by bladernr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If you still have an insanely high-paying IT job, give thanks and keep saving. Chances are good that you won't have it much longer between offshore outsourcing and a whole ton of unemployed IT ppl willing to do your job for less $$$.

      As an executive who out-sourced some work to India and also hires plenty of US talent, I can tell you that highly-skilled US programmers who understand the domain they are working in (health care, telecom, finance, etc) will still command top-dollar.

      Just today (yes, today), I had a major schedule slip that could cost the company millions over that cheap labor. In their defense, the requirement that was given to them was incorrect, and they did a superb job of implementing the system. However, a US based programmer with knowledge of the domain (telecom in this case) would have recognized the requirement as incorrect and would have implemented correct code anyway. As an aside, she said the Big-5 consultancies do a horrible job and providing people with domain expertise, in spite of claims to the contrary.

      Just this week I spent time with a fellow executive from a major ILEC. She told me that they are outsourcing Java work to India like there is no tommorow. However, highly-skilled programmers with true knowledge of the business are still paid as high as they ever were (which is my experience in my organization as well).

      If you want my advise, learn the industry you want to work in. Programming skills are cheap, I don't care how good you are. Business knowledge is still a damn rarity. Business knowledge and the ability to implement it in systems is almost impossible to find. That means it is paid well for.

      Oh yeah, most resumes I see from programmers who think they know the business don't know nearly as much as they think. Spend as much time learning the business as your programming skills, and I think you'll be fine.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  11. That's like... by siskbc · · Score: 4, Funny
    I dunno, $17-$19 CANADIAN???

    ...$0.37 American these days, right? You can do better than that making shoes in Thailand.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  12. Re:Requirements that end up in a checksum failure. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its fairly simple - they actually want to employ a dishonest person.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  13. Job listing I want to see by nate+nice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Requirements: Creative, smart individual who finds delight in working with others and around others. Candidate should have an understanding of computational theory and application and be able to grasp new ideas quickly. Prospective employee should have skills in a couple programming languages as well as the ability to learn a new language or environment quickly. If you are right for this job you will be able to apply your knowledge, logic and intuition to the problems at hand. You enjoy solving problems and discovering new ways to do things. An engineering degree is preferred but not necessary. If you don't have an engineering degree you will be expected to demonstrate competency in math, logic and computer science theory. You will be paid accordingly to your abilities in the above listed requirements.

    Instead we see:
    Must have 10 years of programming in language A that has been around for 4 years. Most know X,Y,Z. We don't care if you can learn X,Y,Z or understand the theory behind X,Y,Z, you must know it because it is a nice buzz-word right now. Be prepared to unlearn X,Y,Z and learn G,H,J when they become the new buzzwords. We don't want you to think, we want you code!! code!! code!!

    But I digress.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Job listing I want to see by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In the real world math, logic and computer science theory don't matter as much as you think they do.

      In the real world, programs that I write will run orders of magnitude faster than ones that you write. Of course, this may not matter to you, writing simple web or dialog box code that interfaces with a db containing a few thousand items(or less). But my code can scale to processing millions, even billions of items. Can you say that? Of course not, you wouldn't know the difference between an n^2 and a log(n) algorithm if it smacked you in the face.

      You may be a code monkey, but I know the difference, and so do my employers and clients.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    2. Re:Job listing I want to see by wiresquire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, you touch on an important factor (if not the most important) that I always work into hiring. It's what you may call attitude or behavioural traits.

      There's several theories around HR and hiring that are based on behavioural observations. ie that what you have done before, you will do again.(Yes you can change behaviours, but it's hard and takes a while, so you're better of hiring someone that has those behaviours already).

      Basically, you ask questions that relate to the behaviours that you want. Eg, for a sysadmin, I need someone with integrity - that won't go stealing passwords, building backdoors, or downing the system if they happened to get laid off.So you can ask a question like "Everyone breaks the rules sometime. Is there a specific situation where you broke the rule that in retrospect you think you shouldn't have ?"

      In effect, you keep probing for proof of past behaviour. Generalizations are not acceptable. You need specific instances. "Do you have an example of that?", "What specifically was your role?", "Could you be more specific?" etc

      Some of you may have encountered this in interviews. There are some 'interview tip' sites that actually talk about this. It can be quite akward for both the interviewer and interviewee, but I have found it to be quite effective.

      I have a theory that part of the effectiveness is that the interviewee has not been exposed to this before, so I usually ask if they are familiar with it up front and explain it may be unusual and somewhat uncomfortable, but don't worry, everyone else is going through the same hell.

      --

      So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

    3. Re:Job listing I want to see by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A job I applied for a couple of years ago (while I was in grad school) required CCNA/CCDA. I didn't have these certifications but I wanted the job and felt like the certifications might come in handy down the line. So I bought two books studied for a week and passed both tests. Did I know anything about network design/implementation? Absolutely not, I'm just a good test taker. Did I get the job? Yep, and what I didn't know I picked up within the first few weeks on the job. If you think that those tests indicate an ability to do the job you are sadly mistaken.

      Certainly it is reasonable to hire someone with some knowledge of the problem domain, but picking up someone who is not a complete idiot tends to pay off far more in the long run (at least in my experience).

  14. Mail room by faust2097 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw a posting for mail room personnel at CNet that said "must have 2 years previous corporate mail room experience". And it wasn't for managing the thing, it was just a nomal clerk position.

    Would you want to hire someone who was either a) so uncapable that working the mail room is the peak of their abilities or b) so ambition-free that they had multiple years of mailroom experience without advancing?

  15. um wtf? by crabpeople · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "worked in IT jobs have been remarking on absolutely horrible job postings for low-level IT jobs paying small change"

    ? except for the rediculous amount of qualifications needed for that poisition, it seems like any other job posting ive seen for helpdesk. also 19 bucks an hour is alot of money to most entry level people i know (including myself). it should be noted that the rent in edmonton for a small apartment is usually around 500 CAN/mth and with this job working 40 hours a week would make like 3k.

    how is 3k a month bad? have you tried looking for work lately? im tryign to find a job doing similar things in vancouver and would be more than happy with 12 or 13 dollars an hour. that would cover rent and internet and all that.

    wtf is the poster on? does he expect everyone to be making 50k+ a year?

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  16. Real posting... by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 5, Funny
    This was a real posting to a job list a few months ago:

    > From: Jenny Richards [mailto:..........@yahoo.com]
    > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 11:11 AM
    > To: .........@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: [.......] Entry level programmer in Duluth, MN
    >
    > Location : Duluth, MN
    > Term : 1 year
    > Rate : $5.10 / hour
    >
    > Requirements:
    >
    > - 21+ years of J2EE Development.
    > - Fluent Sanskrit.
    > - PhD in Computer Science and 17th Century French Poetry.
    > - Must have had 4 or more products that sold 1,000,000 copies.
    > - Must be a member of the Mayflower Society.
    >
    > Locals to Duluth given preference.
    > All requirements are mandatory, so don't waste my time by sending my
    > your pathetic resume unless you're a perfect fit.

    It was real posting to a real job list, which I thought was very funny, but the poster got banned from the list for their sense of humor.

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
    1. Re:Real posting... by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a great way to get in lots of trouble. In the US, by law, you better be able to show an association between the requirements between what a you put on a job posting, and how it is necessary for work. Taking your example above, needing to be Fluent in Sanskrit. If I apply to that job I could go the EEOC and say that the requirements are BS and I am qualified and should have been hired.

      Think of it another way, if I said (for an IT job), "blacks need not apply." Being black would have nothing to do with IT work, I would have my ass-served in a hand-basket to the EEOC. The company that let me post that would be in big trouble and I would likely to be out of a job.

      To take another recent example, jobs that are requiring an SAT score. These companies said that having a high-SAT score related in could job performance. If they said that, they better be able to prove it (which I doubt). SAT scores are used to determine the grades of freshman going to college, not a mark to determine your job skills. You complain that you did not get a job because of your SAT scores that you took 10 years ago, you can get money out of those companies.

      Just because a company says it true, does not make it true. They have an obligation to society to serve its interests as well as their own.

    2. Re:Real posting... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Requiring SAT scores is complete bullshit. How you did on some test in high school is no indicator whatsoever of how you perform on the job at age 30.

      IQ tests mean very little at any point. The bulk of the 'research' done to support the use of IQ tests has been either tainted with eugenic/racist theories or outright fraudulent. Stephen Jay Gould did the cannonical debunking of them in 'the mismeasure of man'.

      When I was at high school I posted some IQ scores that were well outside the standard range - 160 to 180. That is because the school was a selective school and we had a weekly coaching session on the exam to get into the upper school. My scores went from upper decile to 2 to 3 standard deviations above the mean. All through coaching and practice.

      Then when we got into the upper school we were told that research shows that the results are innate. I said the results had to be faulty since the entitre class of us had shown the same type of improvement (not necessarily as extreeme). Thats the point where I discovered that English public schools can hire some awfully stupid geography teachers. The science staff backed me up though.

      Odd thing was that despite all that testing the school never picked up the fact I have a form of dyslexia.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Real posting... by idontgno · · Score: 3, Funny
      Leaving aside that reference to a dead language usually implies a joke

      Hey, you insensitive clod,....

      Damn, I just realized I don't know how to say "fluent in Sanskrit" in Sanskrit. Another fine "insensitive clod" joke ruined.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  17. be grateful for what you have by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work at a dot-com company. One you've heard of, trust me. Anyway, we survived the Internet bubble bursting, and most of us kept our jobs, but things were still tough around here for a couple of years.

    After finding out that the raises one year would be much smaller than expected, a coworker of mine complained about it. I looked at him in bafflement, and told him he should be thankful to be getting a raise at all. He should be happy to have a job at all.

    For that matter, I later reflected, he should be happy simply that he makes enough money to have food to eat, to provide for himself and his loved ones, and not to have to go to bed wondering where his next meal will be coming from. All of us that can say that should be thankful for it.

    Yes, the job the submitter pointed to isn't spectacular pay, but it's enough to feed and clothe yourself in comfort. That's more than most people in the world can say. Try to keep a sense of perspective while you're busy complaining about things.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    1. Re:be grateful for what you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the corporation you work for should be happy it's just staying afloat, maybe making a small profit every once in a while. Further, the executives of that corporation should be happy drawing a small salary with year-to-year increases commensurate with that of you and your co-worker.

      I mean, come ON. This "well, at least we're making enough to get by!" attitude is being seriously exploited by those with "let's take all we possibly can" attitudes. Yes, it's good to be satisfied with what you have in a philosophical sense, but when you're dealing with the world of capitalism it makes perfect sense to do everything you possibly can (including unionization, etc.) to get as much compensation for your services as humanly possible.

    2. Re:be grateful for what you have by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I sympathize your idealism, I mean yes many of us are very fortunate, but it's cuddly statements like yours that motivate employers to exploit their workers.

      If they think they can get you to do it without quitting, THEY WILL.

      Just because I'm luckier than most in the world, doesn't mean I have to stand there and let some corporate goon give it to me in the ass.

  18. foreign workers by flacco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you see any truly unbelievably low pay rates, you can bet they're placing the ad just to fulfill a legal requirement before hiring a foreign worker for peanuts.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  19. On-Call Outlook/Exchange Admin by BigRedFish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As soon as I see 'Administer Outlook/Exchange' and 'on-call 24/7', I don't care how much it pays.

    Besides, I don't have 5 years experience with 2K/XP. I don't know if they do that to weed out liars or what, but it's a big red flag to me that the employer is reality-challenged.

  20. You're right by siskbc · · Score: 3, Funny
    Actually, the Canadian dollar is rising against the USD... when I traveled to Canada last march, I got about 1.6 canadian dollars, and now it's about 1.3

    That's true, but I'm so used to heaping shit on the Canadian currency after *years* of it tanking that it's like a reflex now. ;)

    US is still up a bit over the last 10 years tho.

    Only thing about a weak dollar is it makes good German beer more expensive. Fucking Greenspan.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  21. Too Much Experience Requiried? by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 3, Funny
    I recall reading one for a Level III Linux system administrator. The pay wasn't too shabby, yet the requirements for employeement were sad. The position requiried you to have fifteen years of experience with Linux, and ten with Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server.

    It was bad enough that they wanted MSCE certification in addition, but wanting fifteen years experience with Linux?! ROFL!

  22. More Experience than Possible by Eskarel · · Score: 5, Funny
    Worst I ever saw was sometime last spring looking for 5 years of experience with .NET. The fact that even the eduactional version which had come out a good year or so earlier than the commercial product had not yet been out for two years didn't seem to bother them.

    I'm not even entirely sure whether they had a version of VS .NET which would compile(as in the program not stuff it created) in the spring of 1998. Ahh well, such is lunacy.

  23. County of riverside by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Funny
    The country of Riverside, CA government routinely posts jobs to the public which REQUIRE 3-4 years experience on their inhouse software.

    Can I complain about bad interviews to? I submitted a story about bad interviews but its been pending in the que for *6 weeks* (what does that mean?). I had an interview for qualcomm for a 1 month temp position, and the interviewer asked a bunch of jack-ass quesitons, but this one sent me over the edge "where do you see yourself in 5 years?". To this I replied, "Not working at qualcom for 4 years and 11 months!"

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  24. Re:Requirements that end up in a checksum failure. by llywrch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Supposedly the companies do this so they can say they could not fill the position and off-shore it.

    Mebbe. However, following the principle that one should first look to stupidity before one claims that there is conspiracy, I'd say that requirements like our example arises when a manager tells the job shop, ``I need someone with 6 years of experience with Windows. You know -- NT 4.0, Windows 2000, Windows XP." And the recruiter then decides to simplify the requirements by stating that the position requires ``6 years of experience with Windows XP."

    And six months later, the recruiter can't understand why he isn't making his quota.

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  25. Re:Requirements that end up in a checksum failure. by DrCode · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those that irked me the most were the ones with explicit version requirements, like:

    3 years with Java V1.31a7c
    2 years Swing V2.93xL
    Must have this experience on a Sun station running Solaris 5.839.

    The above is an exaggeration, but only slightly.

  26. from what i've seen by nudicle · · Score: 5, Funny

    CmdrTaco does the worst job posting...

  27. My Job by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fine... this isn't a job posting, this is an actual description of my job duties, but I'll make it look like one:

    • Senior SQL Administrator/Programmer (PostgreSQL)
    • Senior Web Applications Developer (PHP). E-Commerce experience an asset.
    • Toolchain/Plugin Developer (C/C++). Develop PostgreSQL plugins and in-house applications.
    • Senior Network Administrator on a heterogeneous FreeBSD/Linux/WindowsXP environment. Must possess strong skills in server application deployment and windows interoperability. Must possess a background in firewall and network design.
    • BCS/BEE and/or 10+ years of proven software design experience.
    • Background in cryptography is an asset.
    • Must be willing to work overtime when necessary at 1x pay.

    Benefits Package: none, contract basis, terminatable at any time without severance package
    Pay: $14 Canadian/hour

    Wait a minute... what am I doing? Is anyone looking for a developer (or hardware engineer for that matter)?

  28. 'Knowing' isn't enough... by DrCode · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was job-searching last year, it wasn't enough to know a language or API. With all the free tools available, most of us can teach ourselves pretty much anything necessary in a matter of weeks. But most of the abusive job ads had specific requirements for years of paid experience.

    I recall going through one ad, getting excited because I really did have the experience they wanted (Unix, C++, etc.). But then I came to the deal-killer, in all caps: "APPLICANT MUST HAVE THIS EXPERIENCE WORKING FOR A MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER."

  29. too true to be funny by jgarry · · Score: 5, Funny

    I posted this a while back, and some people thought it was too true to be funny. Others saw the humor.

    How to decode an Oracle DBA Want-Ad

    --
    Oracle and unix guy.
  30. College job listings were the worst by amuro98 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember looking for intern/co-op positions through my school's placement center.

    One year, a major computer hardware company came to campus looking ONLY for Ph.D students willing to do 3 month intern positions at minimum wage. Uh.... Turns out their HR department was a bit overzealous.

    Another firm was an IT contracting company. They came to campus looking for new grads with a bachelors in computer science or engineering, and 5 years IT experience... After the representative told the several people that they were wasting his time because they didn't have enough experience, he was escorted off campus and told never to return.

    I also recall a major financial institution wanted to hire CS students with 3 years of programming experience for the summer to - and I'm not making this up - *STAND INSIDE THE WALLS TO MAKE SURE THE NETWORK CABLES DIDN"T COME LOOSE OR BREAK*. The job was located in New York City, paid $5/hr, no assisted living, and you were *required* to live within 10 miles of the office. Oh yes, and you were also required to wear a suit at all times (though I have no idea how you were supposed to keep it clean standing inside crawlspaces all day long...)

    This company, too, was kicked off campus and told never to return.

    1. Re:College job listings were the worst by LuxFX · · Score: 4, Funny

      I met a guy once that (claimed to at least) used ferrets for running cable. He would tie the cable to the ferret and stick him in the ceiling. Then he would open the other end and shake the food/toy/treat/whatever to get the ferret to come over. He said it worked very well.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  31. Re:Requirements that end up in a checksum failure. by tigga · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Requirements: 5 years experience with Windows 2000..."

    How about dogs years?

  32. Re:The job posting for when it leaves... by RevMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    Karma Whore :)

    Plus, why all the <br> tags? And didn't your mommy teach you to use xhtml? Use <br /> instead.

  33. Re:fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. by bladernr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You only think you can tell. If you really know so much, you would have caught the spec error that you sent to India AND having fucked up, you could fix it yourself. Fuck you for your attitude and get to work, bitch.

    Interesting that you assume as an executive I don't know much about the IT systems I oversee. Would it suprise you to learn that I have published papers, articles, and a book on the subjects of distributed and parallel computing as well as object-oriented design theory? I rose through the ranks with technical skills, not business skills. I learned my business skills on the job.

    I have hired as many people since the "bubble-burst" in March 2000 in the US as in India (actually, probably a bit more in the US). Of course, that probably interfers with your world-view of my type. I have also spent no training money in India, but plenty in the US. I require my outsourcing company to provide trained people, but I hire "fresh" people and train them routinely. Of course, that probably interferes with your world-view of my type as well.

    You are free to think I am overpaid, but I can point to plenty of my fellow executives (defined as Director level and above by most business-experts) that make well less that highly-skilled software engineers.

    The spec error I missed was buried in hundreds of pages of specs, reviewed by teams of people. You may find this hard to believe, but I have never in my life seen a perfect spec. If you pick up great works of fine literature, you can easily find spelling and gramatical errors. The mistake that I missed was a single missing word.

    But, you obviously have a view that no one can change. I feel sorry for people who are so convinced they know everything.

    --
    Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  34. The worst job I saw by dayton967 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The worst job I saw was about 3 years ago.. The job required a MCSE in a pure unix shop. I called up and asked how many windows machines were in the environment, and there were none. When asked why does it require an MCSE, the statement was that they were best qualified to operate the servers. Go figure..

  35. Focus on the Family by BanjoBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here in Colorado Springs, we have a very Christian organization that claims to project values and morals through their very profitable enterprise. They run ads all the time such as director of information technology ($28,000 / yr) and web designer for even less. They never get anybody to work for them and those that do just use them as a stepping stone. If FotF was really a Christian and moral company, they'd pay moral wages.

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
  36. Re:fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. by CheeseMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    twitter wrote:
    You only think you can tell... [blahblahblah] ... People who know what they are doing don't look down on others and say things like "they don't know as much as they think they do."

    Hm. I can't help but notice the humor here. And by humor I mean "the fact that you are a complete and total hypocritical asshole"

    Honestly, how can you smack this guy down for claiming he knows something about what other people do right after you've presumed to know all about his job and what he knows or doesn't know?

    You are a tool, my friend, in every sense of the word. And your attitude completely betrays the truth of this statement... you're very bitter about your tool status. Sorry. Maybe next life!
    --
    Nothing to see here.
  37. Hey, I'm hiring a lot by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have Tons of Positions(TM) open right now... we develop software to perform Radar Cross Section Analysis.


    Now, for those of you who clicked before reading on, the only drawback is that I have no money, so there is no pay :) It's all just for fun, but still something you can do to keep your skills up and have something to put on your resume if you're between jobs. There are about half a dozen of us right now.. it isn't such a bad gig :)

  38. Wiretapping?? by Avihson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone is blowing smoke at you!
    As a Sysadmin you have full rights to anything on the servers and LAN that you or your employers own. Wiretapping does not come into play unless the government does it, or the government has somone do it as their agent. The only type of recording employers can not do is voice without the notifying their employees that they are subject to monitoring and recording. (However in Penna, you have to have the consent of both parties for a voice recording.)

    Email belongs to the boss, all your surfing habits belong to the boss. Hell anything you do on your home machine is subject to whatever your employer wants to do if you connect to their network and use just one piece of software supplied by them.

    Tell your source to try looking at the laws on search and siezure before giving you false legal info.
    There is no "Title X", Many statutes and laws have titles that exceed X (10 in Roman Numerals) but Title X of what law? what statute?
    IANAL, but IAALS (I am a Law Student) and I suggest that you try reading:
    ISBN 0-8493-1192-6, Cyber Crime Investigator's Field Guide by Bruce Middleton, Appendix G
    or just go to US DOJ Computer Crime
    The Search and Seizure manual is here: S&S Manual.pfd
    HTML
    Short excerpt from page 7 of the pdf:
    4. Private Searches
    The Fourth Amendment does not apply to searches conducted by private parties who are not acting as agents of the government.
    The Fourth Amendment "is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official." United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113 (1984) (internal quotation omitted). As a result, no violation of the Fourth Amendment occurs when a private individual acting on his own accord conducts a search and makes the results available to law enforcement. See id. For example, in United States v. Hall, 142 F.3d 988 (7th Cir. 1998), the defendant took his computer to a private computer specialist for repairs. In the course of evaluating the defendant's computer, the repairman observed that many files stored on the computer had filenames characteristic of child pornography.
    The repairman accessed the files, saw that they did in fact contain child pornography, and then contacted the state police. The tip led to a warrant, the defendant's arrest, and his conviction for child pornography offenses. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit rejected the defendant's claim that the repairman's warrantless search through the computer violated the Fourth Amendment.
    Because the repairman's search was conducted on his own, the court held, the Fourth Amendment did not apply to the search or his later description of the evidence to the state police. See id. at 993. See also United States v. Kennedy, 81 F. Supp. 2d 1103, 1112 (D. Kan. 2000)
    (concluding that searches of defendant's computer over the Internet by an anonymous caller and employees of a private ISP did not violate Fourth Amendment because there was no evidence that the government was involved in the search).

    c) Employer Searches in Private-Sector Workplaces Warrantless workplace searches by private employers rarely violate the Fourth Amendment. So long as the employer is not acting as an instrument or agent of the Government at the time of the search, the search is a private search and the Fourth Amendment does not apply. See Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n, 489 U.S. 602, 614 (1989).

    Now, if you or your employer is privy to illegal activity online, you are duty bound to report it, or face the consequences as a conspirator. Whoever is giving you that "title X" line is setting you up for a fall!

  39. here it is by kuroth · · Score: 3, Funny
    About Us
    We're I-bought-cheesy-puffs-on-the-interweb.com, a startup Fortune 23,500,000 company with a fantastic new idea! We're going to sell home-delivered cheese puffs over the interweb!

    Project Requirements
    We'd need the sun, the moon, and the stars, as well as your first born child and a hand job. All source code must be provided, and you must assign all copyrights to us. We need this project completed within the next three hours. Contractor will be required to provide lifetime support for code base, even if we let the neighbor kid muck about in the source code (Janice says that he's a web developer, so he must be qualified. Besides, he's in the 10th grade now, we're sure he knows what he's doing).

    Contractor Requirements
    • 5-7 years of experience in developing large-scale database-driven interweb applications in whatever language we arbitrarily choose because the kid that mows the CEO's lawn says it's kewl.
    • 7-10 years of hands on experience administering FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris, and Windows systems. Developer will be required to provide support for desktop users as part of his or her job.
    • 7-10 years of hands-on experience administering relational databases.
    • PhD in Computer Science
    • MCP/MCSE/OCM/OCP/ABACAB certifications. All of them.
    • Special consideration will be given to applicants who can lend us a web server until we get started.

    Compensation
    We offer a generous compensation package that includes free soda (Wednesdays only) and all the pretzels you can eat! Yay!

    We'll also give you a title! Yes, you'll be the Supervisory Director of Internet Architectural Engineering (Junior)! That's the kind if title that you can almost pay a mortgage with! Almost.

    Unfortunately, we can't offer compensation in the form of pay or benefits right now. When the interweb cheese puffs delivery service takes off, though, we'll pay you really, really well. Promise!

  40. Subsidized drugs? Bullshit. Shorter patents. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I am Canadian but I am living in the States, and have been for 3 1/2 years. You are right, for some people, the medical system is much better. And yes, people who have good jobs have a higher standard of living than those in similar jobs in most any other country.

    However you missed the boat on drugs. Drugs are NOT subsidized in Canada. Nor is dental work, nor are eyeglasses. But, patent life in Canada is shorter. This means there is more competion, and medicine is cheaper. Ah well, you are right Canada does have slow health care. Charging $50.00 to the the morons that show up at the emergency ward with the sniffles (a non emergency) instead of the doctor's office would help Canada afford something better. It happens all the time. This is the one lesson from American health insurance that Canadians could well learn from. It costs about 3 or 4 times the price of a doctor's office visit to go to the emergency room... and that is just to be triaged before treatment!

    However... and now a major rant against American health care: You're probably the type who never bothered to notice the clerk at a local store wince because he or she is in pain from a back injury. And you probably don't give a shit that they can't get it fixed becuase they can't afford it on the wage they make, the store they work at doesn't provide health insurance, and they make too much to get medicade. Just as long as you can get your MRI in a day, who gives a fuck about the 70,000,000 who can't get any MRI? But then again, maybe you are also one of those hypocrytical born again Christian assholes who says universal medicare is not for you because the people who can't afford health insurance should stop whining and get a real job like I hear these dickheads say all the time. Like Jesus when healing a lame begger ever stopped to say, "do you have an HMO or a PPO? What, no insurance? Sorry piss off."

    It is amazing that a county that outspends by far any other country in the world per capita in health care, doesn't care to make sure everyone is covered. That is the black side of American health care. On the other hand, you may need a long time to get an MRI in Canada, but you will get it whether you are employed or not. And if it is an emergency, you will get it in minutes. Urgent, in hours. Nice to have, you have to wait. I had a shoulder operation after I was hurt... after I was laid off from a company. I wouldn't have been able to afford it here. Canada has also either the first on second healtiest population in the world according the the U.N. That is because everyone has access to basic health care. The mattress store clerk in Ballwin, MO. wouldn't have to live in chronic pain. The U.S. by the way, falls way down the list, below Canada and many of the European Union countries who all have universal health care.

    So you want to knock universal health care? And people keep saying Americans are selfish. Can you imagine that? Get a clue.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  41. Not bad... by http101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For $19.00 an hour on a 2-year contract? I'm there. I got shafted by HP, yes, Hewlett Packard, for $15.00 an hour and got hosed after busting my ass for 5 months. Just one day, "Oh, we love your work, you're great, you work hard, we're downsizing, goodbye." "Can I get my stuff from my desk?" "No, we're boxing it up for you as we speak." Thank you very fucking much. BTW, can we pass a couple more H1-B Visas, I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH SWAMIS IN THIS NATION YET. I LIKE GOING TO BED AT NIGHT KNOWING I CAN BE FIRED AT ANY MOMENT AND THAT MY DAUGHTER WILL PROBABLY STARVE IF I CAN'T PROVIDE FOR HER FOOD.

    IF WE DON'T UNIONIZE INFO-TECH, NONE OF US WILL BE LEFT TO SPEAK FOR.

    UNIONIZE NOW!

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  42. AOL skills by Adler · · Score: 3, Funny

    i once saw, and have a screen shot of, a job ad asking for, and im not making this up "1137 A01" skills, this was for a level 1 support specialist in san diego. i stil wonder if it was a joke or not.

    --

    Everybody denies I am a genius--but nobody ever called me one!