Slashdot Mirror


Technological Flights Of Fancy That Fizzled

prostoalex writes "MSNBC's Alan Boyle takes a look at seven futuristic dreams for the past that never managed to materialize into anything substantial in this 21st century. At the top of the list are flying cars, with personal jetpacks, passenger airships, supersonic commercial flights, space travel and colonies, with propulsion breakthroughs completing the list."

27 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Bug free Operating Systems? by PierceLabs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surprised that's not on the list anywhere ...

    1. Re:Bug free Operating Systems? by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably because the artical is detailing aeronautical inventions, and the closest any of my OSes have come to flying is the short, sharp drop out my window.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  2. Where are those skateboards from Back To The.. by ryan76 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where are the flying skateboards from Back to the Future?

    --
    http://threetechguys.info Come, discuss Technology. Got a technology question? Come ask!
  3. Transportation by apoplectic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting that all of these failed technologies are transportation based. Good thing we invented the SUV instead of personal jetpacks, or some nonsense.

    1. Re:Transportation by Saige · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good thing we invented the SUV instead of personal jetpacks, or some nonsense.

      Imagine if computers went down the same development route that led to SUVs...

      They'd use three times the electricity to get the same amount of work done, they'd take up all of your desk, they'd be more likely to crash, and when they did so, all your data would be safe, but anyone nearby not using one of these machines would have all of their data erased.

      Sounds like advancement to me...

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:Transportation by baldass · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about tubes? Arent we all supposed to be shot around in tubes by now?

  4. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the prediction of hundreds of cable channels did come true and yet there is still nothing on.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually there was something on but and it was great, but you missed it while you were surfing slashdot.

  5. How about by Quixadhal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fast low-latency connectivity to every home, via a low-cost fiber-optic cable?

    I remember Ye Olde Phone Company, back in 1995, was telling me (on a tour of the "copper racks" no less) that they planned to start installing residential fiber right into people's houses next year, and that the whole city would be wired up within 5 years...

    Obviously, 5 years of Corporate Time!

    So, I have my cable modem, which is nice for downloads... but still sucks for latency.

  6. What about monkey men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want my monkey man!

  7. Hm by precogpunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why didn't "Windows Security" make it on the list? Oh wait, this is MSNBC...

  8. quantum teleportation != Propulsion breakthroughs by millette · · Score: 2, Funny

    quantum teleportation != Propulsion breakthroughs

    Seriously, it has nothing to do with propulsion, Mr. Boyle. <grin>We'll have to wait another lightyear at least to see better propulsion.</grin>

  9. Fortunately... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    ...we have all the penis enlargers, cheap toner cartridges, and some other Chinese-looking stuff that I can't read, that money can buy!

    Who would have dreamed that thirty years ago!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  10. Star [Wars/Trek?] by freeweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    But how about totally revolutionary physics -- the kind of thing we see in "Star Wars" or "Star Trek"?

    You mean the kind of revolutionary physics that allows multi-ton objects to turn on a dime at insanely high velocities (with nothing to "push" against) without tearing themselves apart, and also without expending the energy of a small nuclear blast in order to do it? :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Star [Wars/Trek?] by herulach · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whats to say that the ships in Star Wars/Trek dont expend the energy of a small nuclear blast? Its not that inconcievable if theyre powered by fusion reactors. I mean have you seen the horsepower those warp cores can pull with a performance air filter and a bit of nitrous? You wouldnt belive how many if i told you.

    2. Re:Star [Wars/Trek?] by Mukaikubo · · Score: 3, Funny

      According to my handy-dandy references, 17,230,000 horsepower is developed by the warp core. No word on what effect re-polarizing the plasma flux capacitors would have. Oh god, I need a woman.

  11. I don't understand #6: Space Colonies by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Funny
    After all, we completed work on Moonbase Alpha over 4 years ago. I've been watching the efforts of Commander Koening on my personal televiewer for quite some time now.

    Oh, wait. It's medication time. And jello with dinner!

  12. Paging Dr. Nick! by freeweed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pressurized hydrogen (aka deuterium) is supposedly inflammable, and doesn't actually become flammable until it has a proper oxygen/hydrogen ratio (at which point it returns to being H).

    Dr. Nick: You mean inflammable means flammable? What a country!

    I'll leave this one for the chemistry geeks in the crowd to chuckle over :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  13. That was stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Think twice before posting next time unless you want an extra large greased Yoda doll stuffed up your ass.

  14. Clueless Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Obviously the fine folks at popular mechanics have never watched SPIDERMAN. The Green Goblin's personal hovercraft and the military jet-pack are great examples that they simply overlooked. I'm sure once there is enough demand they will start mass producing both.

  15. Re:But ... Uhh ... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll see your commercial and raise you a Leno bit.

    To quote:
    Randal: It's times like this it occurs to me that we were lied to by "The Jetsons".
    ...
    Dante: Yeah, well most of us rational thinkers weren't banking on a cartoon to offer us a viable glimpse into the future of technological development.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  16. 7 easily achievable technologies that don't exist by faust2097 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Forget living on the moon, there's some improvements we can make right now:
    1. A version of Internet Explorer that correctly ignores whitespace and comments [I'm giving them a pass, MS claims that fixing their CSS implementation will require an OS rewrite]
    2. A color printer with cheap consumables
    3. A television service that only gives you channels you actually want
    4. A car alarm that only goes off when your vehicle is actually being broken into or stolen
    5. An email client that ships with built-in spam filters for the words 'mortgage', 'consolidate', 'viagra', 'diploma', 'enlarge', 'degree' and 'inkjet'
    6. A free, full-featured FTP client for OS X
    7. A Slashdot story redundancy checker
  17. Bah! by breon.halling · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forget flying cars and colonies on the Moon! I'm still waiting for Duke Nukem Forever!

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  18. Kevin Smith and the flying car! by emkman · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you haven't seen it already, watch The Flying Car immediately. From director Kevin Smith starring everyones favorites Dante and Randal

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  19. Re:Passenger airships by Ezubaric · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. "Research" and a geocities link in the together ... that's gotta be credible.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
  20. Where's My Orgasmotron? by Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny

    The future ain't what it used to be. Alas we have no paper clothes, moving sidewalks, flying cars, or orgasmatrons. Yet no one could have predicted the spork. Look at how it revolutionized our fast food industry. NOT a day goes by when I think about all those sporks I got at Kentucky Fried Chicken (before they changed their name to KFC). Truly a failure of imagination on the part of our futurists and science fiction writers.

    If there is one unpredicted technological gadget that we must all worship and bow before it is the beer widget. A miracle! Of the widgeted stouts I've had both Beamish and Guiness. And Boddington's is pretty tasty too.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  21. Re:Where are the breakthroughs ? by MadMoses · · Score: 2, Funny

    What happened to inventions since then ?
    Patents & Lawyers.

    --

    Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.