Slashdot Mirror


Documentary about Professional Gaming

Simon Bysshe writes "My name is Simon Bysshe, I'm 22 & am currently studying film at the Bournemouth Arts Institute in the UK. For the last 3 months I've been working on a unique new freely downloadable film about the advent of professional gaming [there's also a BitTorrent mirror via GameTab]. The main purpose of the documentary 'Modern Day Gamer 2' is to ask whether we will ever see gaming become a mainstream spectator sport. The film features the UK based Four Kings Wolfenstein team as they compete at the Quakecon gaming event in Dallas Texas. The film also features interviews with John Romero, Sujoy Roy (iGamesUK), Paul 'Locki' Wedgwood (Splash Damage) & many other industry/gaming figures. This is the sequel to my original documentary which focused on the growth of gaming as a sociable hobby & received over 50,000 downloads worldwide. Running time: 17minutes 47seconds. Filesize : 157MB. Format: WMV."

37 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Format question ... by El+Cubano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Running time: 17minutes 47seconds. Filesize : 157MB. Format: WMV.

    How about a non-MS or non-proprietary format? Seriously, I am not trying to troll. As much as people gripe about how bad and inferior all MS formats are, I sure do see lots of WMA and WMV all over the place.

  2. watching games might not be so popular. by civilengineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The main purpose of the documentary 'Modern Day Gamer 2' is to ask whether we will ever see gaming become a mainstream spectator sport.

    The reason specatator sports are so popular is that it takes a lot of years of effort and strenous training to be competetive at professional level. People enjoy these sports vicariously. That is not the case with gaming. Gaming is something people like to take active part in. That's the whole reason games are so popular. It would take lot of years of practise for someone to achieve a professional level 'worth watching' status in games and by then that game would be outdated.
    Anyway, I will correct my opinions if there are wrong by watching the documentary. Thanks!

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
    1. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by dnaumov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The reason specatator sports are so popular is that it takes a lot of years of effort and strenous training to be competetive at professional level."
      ...SNIP...
      "That is not the case with gaming."

      You have GOT to be fucking kidding me. Try entering a high-profile competition in QuakeWorld, StarCraft or Quake 3 without having YEARS of experience in first-person shooters. You'll be running back to your mamma within minutes.

    2. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by nfk · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the other hand, you have to consider that the skills you develop aren't useful for just one game. If you had played Doom for months, you'd be better at Quake when it came out, then you'd practice on that and you would be better at the next game, and so on. Even unrelated games can help, by improving your coordination, strategies, etc.

    3. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 4, Insightful
      i think spectator sports are popular because they play the game so well, not because of what they went through to get there. i really could care less if the teams in one sport trained ahrder than the teams in another sport, i just really care about which sport plays hardest.

      people do watch counter-strike matches, but since most gamers know about computers well enough, we do in-game spectating as opposed to watching it on lower-res TVs. if there were a group that did *good* commentary, along with setting up good camera angles and having a bit longer wait time between rounds (for replays and such), then it might be more interesting in that way. gaming as a "sport" (like bowling or billards as a sport) is still in its beginning, so give it some time to see where it really goes.

    4. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by ePIsOdEOnline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "professional gamers" is an oxymoron,

      This is exactly what they said to all of the state boarders and BMXers, and now look at the massive following that has become as a spectator sport. Kind of interesting though, gaming seems to be the chosen method of alternate entertainment by the professionals (Tony Hawk, et al) in that industry.

    5. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by Popadopolis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hell, Korea has computer games televised. Japan does too. Spectating videogames seems to have caught on there, why not here?

    6. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by nathanh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Skate Boarders and BMXers still depend on actual physical talents and overall physical health outside of hand-eye coordination.

      Yes, but professional atheletes are not necessarily fit.

      I know it's asking for karma burn, but "professional" gamers aren't worth shit in the end. They aren't special. Actual ATHLETES are.

      Darts. Bowls. Archery. Billiards. Skeet Shooting.

      Not only are they spectator sports, they get international coverage. Some of them are even Olympic events. You do not need to be fit to be an athelete. Hand-eye coordination is good enough.

      Professional gaming is not an oxymoron.

    7. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, it takes years of experience and a lot of natural skill to get good enough to compete professionally. Unfortunately, no matter how good someone gets few people will actually watch them play. Why? BECAUSE IT"S BORING. VERY, VERY BORING. WHY THE -HELL- WILL I WATCH YOU PLAY WHEN I CAN JUST GO PLAY MYSELF?

    8. Re:watching games might not be so popular. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rooting is simple -- Go for which ever teams are from your country. I'm hoping Team3D takes CPL winter this year and really shuts up everyone that thought they went downhill because of losing CAL finals against TSG 13-4.

      Gaming is much more active than something like baseball from the spectating perspective -- In baseball someone throws a ball, someone else hits it, they run around a bit, repeat.
      In CounterStrike, You have a sniper watching through the middle entrance trying to see any counterterrorists running to defend bombsite b, then telling his team which side to attack based on that, then you have the perfectly layed out teamwork involving very intense situations (last round of overtime, you're the only one alive vs 3 enemies and you only have a pistol, lose this round and you're out of the running)
      CS and Chess also both have something going for it -- They're both games of strategy rather than steroids. No matter how good your twitch muscle is, if the other team can predict your every move and force you to make mistakes then you have no chance.

      As for whoever said gamign doesnt take years to master -- Watch any playoff match. If you ever ended up playing against one of them, You'd get shot through every wall you try to run by, if you were lucky enough to make it past a corner you'd instantly have a bullet in your head.
      Even of all of the pros theres a small amount that have a chance at winning, theres a good discussion going on in the forums at GotFrag? about that right now.

      Watching is much more enjoyable to from a technical standpoint -- Watching on TV is purely passive, watching a live match on HLTV lets you be the cameraman, watching whatever part you want, with the ability to go into an overview mode or watch first person and see exactly what someone else sees. Watching a pre-recorded match gives you all of that AND the ability to pause/rewind/fast forward (who needs TiVo?).
      You can also learn from watching. Traditional sports have all been played so long it is very rare you'll see anything new, but with e-sports there is constantly a new change or two to throw things up, so now we have new crazes like 'the money game' (purposely losing a round after winning for X rounds in a row so that they stop getting so much money on each loss, but only after taking out 4 of their 5 teammates then have all of your team hide so that they have to buy a new gun and you dont.). Any team can take this new knowledge and apply it to their lower end matches (with varying degrees of success), but with most sports theres nothing to do but bet on a team and drink a lot of beer.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  3. I doubt that professional gaming... by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    will become a spectator sport for strategy games. Most people, except for those who are quite into the game, don't have the attention span to watch people set up their bases etc. They just want the battles, in most cases. Most well-played strategy games can go on for well over an hour, and I just don't think that people are willing to wait around for the big battles. They'd rather just see the highlight reels. But for action games, I think that there is a potential for this to happen, because, right off the bat, you are able to start fighting, without having to build up defenses, which means that people get the action immediately. Also, you respawn as soon as you die, so the length of the action can be controlled.

    --
    Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    1. Re:I doubt that professional gaming... by Beardydog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chess is a spectator sport, and there are enormous Scrabble competitions. Gaming will never be the kind of thing that sells out a stadium, but I can imagine a weekly show cropping up on one of the "educational" channels dedicated to gaming. It would have to be edited pretty well,and do a lot of behind-the-scenes, but I would probably enjoy wat ching it.

  4. I tried to RTFA by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    and it said to WTFM

  5. Professional Gaming by xintegerx · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Professional Gamer?" What, they are state licensed?

    But seriously, with all that press coverage, and repetitive stress injuries, expect to see PG's form basic organizational structures, like unions, licensing boards, nickname boards!, and stuff, before developers/computer programmers ever develop just one of those.. sheesh!

  6. Title Suggestion.... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    instead of "Modern Day Gamer 2"

    "Modern Day Gamers Go Gold"

  7. MMORPG "PVP" and FPS tournaments by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For many, these two "events" are already spectator sports.

    I once saw about 200 people crowded around an arena watching a collection of gladiators fighting to the death for a cash prize. We were all placing bets and shouting at the combatants. Some people actually missed work to come witness the battles.

    None of us were actually "there", at least not physically: it all transpired in the virtual world of "Ultima Online".

    That was three years ago. I wonder how large the gatherings are now?

  8. No by RightInTheNeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say video gaming will never become as big of a spectator sport as the big main sports (NFL,NBA,NHL,MLB) because of one missing ingredient. That ingredient is the fans being emotionally attached to thier team and its players past and present because they are real people. When Brett Favre retires from football fans will feel emotional about it, some packer fans may even cry.

  9. The Real Reason for Spectators by globalar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These kinds of articles (or documentaries, as the case may be) really beg the question "Why do people watch other people in activities?"

    Now we have all been conditioned to answer because its entertaining to watch highly skilled professionals compete for the love of the game (stay with me), or something like that. But really, I would venture to guess that it has a lot to do with identity and community.

    For example, if you watch sports, don't you sometimes or maybe even regularly mention events in the sports world to others who are interested (or maybe even not)? Do you ever consider yourself a fan, and attach it to your identity (like at a party you might say "yeah, I'm a such-and-such fan" or "I'm a big fan of sports X and Y")?

    Likewise, how often do you watch events with other people? How often do you go with other people or meet them at an event? And don't you talk about it with certain groups of people? I am not a sports person, so please forgive me if you are a lone spectator. I am sure there are some.

    This all revolves around what really drives masses to be spectators. I would venture to guess that their identity and the community (which are in some ways tied together for a lot people, maybe everyone) make them spectators. I would even go further to say that without these aspects, mass market spectator sports would not be quite so mass market. Sorry, I didn't watch the video - just some thoughts from a non-spectator.

    1. Re:The Real Reason for Spectators by Saeger · · Score: 4, Funny
      Most Sports == War games.
      Team A == Warrior Tribe A.
      Team B == Warrior Tribe B.
      Fans of Team A == Lesser Members of Tribe A.
      Fans of Team B == Lesser Members of Tribe B.

      Us. vs Them. Some like to live vicariously through "Us" or through "Them".

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  10. The Slashdot Gaming Timewarp Continues... by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The main purpose of the documentary 'Modern Day Gamer 2' is to ask whether we will ever see gaming become a mainstream spectator sport."

    Ahem, JAPAN.
    Heck, we'll even throw S.Korea in there.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  11. Gaming Book by dolo666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A pretty good book to read if you are interested in gaming professionally, is Monster Gaming, by Ben Sawyer. Not only does it outline the competitive online gaming community, it delves into mods and other cool stuff like customization & configuration. The book has a foreword by Angel Munoz, the founder of the CPL, and cover art by Id legend Paul Steed. While Monster Gaming is not about becoming a CPL athlete, it is about being a better gamer.

    The number of wicked web links in there is enough for any gamer to drool over. I've been thinking of doing a Slashdot book review of it, too.

  12. Direct Link to Torrent by sgarrity · · Score: 4, Informative

    To avoid an unnecessary page load on their server, here's a direct link to the bittorrent version.

  13. Sports are naturally boring to watch... by ejito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing I've never understood is the rage over football (both), basketball, etc... Why the hell would I watch people play something I could be doing myself?

    However, I listen to the Team Sportscast Network when I'm bored, and also hang out in #tsn. I like it there because it's a community that PLAYS what they love, not just listen. People who know the game first hand; a relaxed community which knows the pros personally.

    I find watching games more interesting than conventional sports because the game is always changing -- they aren't limited by real life physics and laws. The rules and gameplay are always evolving overtime.

    Although rules change with videogames, i find game rules to be much more appealing. Sports that require referees take away from the game, along with judged sports. The computer counts and grades players in VGs, not some dude with a whistle. If anything, I find videogames to be a more relevant sport than games that rely on referees for fundamental parts of the game such as "foul balls", "penalties" and "strikes".

    In the end though, I don't really want videogames to become mainstream sports -- it'll just end up controlled and abused like the rest of the sports. Don't get me wrong, I like tournaments, and I also want the very best players making enough for a living. What I don't look forward to is gamers becoming commercialized, overglorified, cocky jerks (it's partially there already) like other other sports "heros".

  14. My experiences... by hookedup · · Score: 3, Informative


    I used to play Desert Combat a lot a while back. I started playing with a clan (to get the whole 'teamplay' experience) who were involved in gaming league. During these games, there would be two spectators present, one on either team. These two specs would do a play by play of the game, both in contact with each other at the same time, and they would shoutcast these matches to the masses. These broadcasts also had a slight time delay to avoid cheating by either team.

    One of these shoutcast groups is Team Sports Network you can listen to live games, or download past matches.

  15. Just in case by edalytical · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case of slashdoting here is a still of the John Romero interview.

    --
    Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  16. But some may say..... by reality-bytes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But some may say that the players, sat at their PCs are the personalities.

    Having spectated at a few UK Lanparties, I can say that the 'players' are genuinely a mixed bunch and generally a very personable lot. (After all people can *hit* you if you misbehave on a lan).

    The thing that makes major players so popular in many sports is marketing - in the UK we only have to look at David Beckham to know how true this is.

    Having said that, Beckham is working for and living with a team in Spain.............go figure :/

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  17. Re:vegans by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny
    they feel it is their duty to evangelize in a biblical fashion how linux is good and Windows is EVIL

    You misunderstand. Windows is not evil, just crappy. It's Microsoft that's evil.

  18. Nice editing... (mod parent down) by gumpish · · Score: 3, Informative
    I think the part you "snipped" is kind of important.

    You have edited his comment so that it seems he is saying that it doesn't take effort to play games at the professional level.

    This is not even close to what he wrote. Since you seem determined to misrepresent the author's actual sentiment (or maybe you just misread it and didn't realize that your edit grossly distorts what he wrote?), here is the complete thought:

    The reason specatator sports are so popular is that it takes a lot of years of effort and strenuous training to be competetive at professional level. People enjoy these sports vicariously. That is not the case with gaming. Gaming is something people like to take active part in. That's the whole reason games are so popular. It would take lot of years of practise for someone to achieve a professional level 'worth watching' status in games and by then that game would be outdated.


    (Emphasis mine.) Please, read it again. You will see that the author stated that IT IS NOT THE CASE THAT PEOPLE ENJOY VIDEO GAMES VICARIOUSLY. The author does NOT state that it is not the case that it takes effort to play at the professional level.

    Please, read the comment you are replying to next time. Slashdot thanks you.
  19. Try fighting games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Recently, Shoryuken.com held their Evolution 2k3 fighting games tournament in California State University, Pomona. Over a thousand gamers came to take part in 9 different fighting game tournaments ranging from Street Fighter III : 3rd Strike to Soul Calibur 2 for cash prizes worth over $20,000.

    You might want to check it out at

    http://www.shoryuken.com/evolution

    Apparently the event was a success and many gamers had fun hanging out and taking part in the tourneys. The site has a forum called EVO2k3 Aftermath where you can view their personal experiences about the whole event. It seems pretty interesting and would be a perfect example of games becoming mainstream. On a side note, these gamers videocam their games and of great players in their own efforts to improve themselves.

    The site also offers a DVD of their previous tournaments (they have been running national tournaments for more than 5 years), so gamers can watch top players go at it at their own leisure. Judging from their success, I don't doubt professional gaming is not possible.

  20. Well, there's an easy way to fix that. by Inoshiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Grab mplayer and install it. Run mencode to transcode the WMV file to a different format.

    Once that's done, head on over to the BitTorrent website and grab the software. Run a tracker and leave a seed open.

    Then post it to Slashdot in a message where you can say, "look at me -- 20 minutes of work and a little CPU time, and I made an open format version of a movie that everyone can enjoy -- plus the video's encoded smaller because of the better codec!"

    This will probably net you some great karma, in addition to making your initial format question moot. It's all a matter of effort and motivation :)

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  21. Live sports vs. Virtual Sports by nicodemus05 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most people, except for those who are quite into the game, don't have the attention span to watch people set up their bases etc.

    Most people don't give a sports match their full attention. They might raptly watch the replays, they might focus more the game when it gets tense, but most people are hanging out with their friends at the same time, or eating, or switching between ESPN and CBS.

    The way that televised sports cope with the monotony of the wait for action is with commentary. They'll step out of the game to give stats, a retired professional will give his take on the rookie at bat or the down just completed. Most people don't want to watch players set up their bases, but they also don't much care to watch the football players line up time and time again. Most soccer fans don't pay nearly as much attention when the ball is in midfield as they do when the players are poised for a shot on goal.

    Conclusion 1: Game spectating needs to be something you can do in a group before it will catch on.

    Conclusion 2: There needs to be a mechanism to give commentary and instant replays to the viewers.

    Conclusion 3: Game spectating has to be flexible. It has to be something that you can give part of your divided attention to, not the sole activity of a few hours on a Sunday afternoon.

    --
    while (!sleep){

    sheep++;

    }

  22. Re:Why not DivX? by azav · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might not know this but 3ivx jsut released a 2 pass mp4 encoder on Tuesday. When using the proper settings, 3ivx creates pretty sweet video with good quality/size results.

    I know previour reports indicated otherwise but the reviewers didn't use the proper compression settings.

    They also have an mp2 transcoder called Diva.

    Http://www.3ivx.com
    http://www.3ivx.com/downloa d/index.html

    Enjoy.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  23. And why .zip? by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also, why is it .zip compressed! Any decent video and audio compression includes its own entropy encoding, so that a .zip or whatever will produce virtually no size savings.

    If you had a file where .zip worked, that'd tell you that you did something wrong!

    1. Re:And why .zip? by millette · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hi benwaggoner,

      Not particularly responding to you, just looking for a branch to grow on. Now that that's established, I have a few complaints as well.

      1. A zip so people don't stream it? You can do better then that!
      2. 720 x 576? Was it really necessary to encode with these dimensions? It hardly plays on my 1GHz computer?
      3. ...

      Just too tired to think of anything else, and it's probably been mentionned before. But I had to say something after spending 5 hours downloading the movie, and another hour watch a 15-minute video. Yeah, I had to strip the audio out because it was unbearable, cut cut cutting all the time.

      I finally ended up with the video muted, and lagging since it was too close to 100% cpu usage, and foobar2000 playing the audio in parallel, which I had to repeatedly pause to get any sort of sync.

      Good news is I have an ogg file available. It's 16 MiB, and doesn't stutter :)

  24. asinine reasoning by honold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Why the hell would I watch people play something I could be doing myself?"

    do you listen to music? you could play instruments too.

    watch movies? you could make your own with a digital camera's trivial film mode.

    ever notice that people involved in sports tend to be avid fans of professional sports? ever notice budding musicians tend to listen to other, more accomplished musicians?

    it's because they can't do what the pros can, at least not yet. they're able to command massive salaries because the audience is watching, and the audience wouldn't waste their time to watch bush leaguers.

  25. Here's an idea by 5lash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Computer gaming cant be as succesful with spectators as "normal" sports (football rugby etc) because: traditionally people support the team for the town they live in. gives u a sense of pride, loyalty, patriotism whatever. but a main concept of online gaming is that you can form a team with anyone anywhere. most clans dont have anyone from the same town/city, and often people from different countries. so like, which team/clan would you choose to support? I'm pretty sure it will get popular amongst people like me and you who play the games, but wont hit the mainstream.

  26. Gaming != "sport" && Gaming != "pro" by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry I am going to have to get some of those pinhead moderators to waste points on me here as I hear crybaby gamers all the time whine and moan. (Usually over things they don't understand because they can't stop playing long enough to read and research.)

    Gaming is *NOT* a sport!! Shit, you waste away hours leading to weeks of your life twitching only a few muscles for a digital score...sporty as a Gremlin next to a Porsche. The use of the term "professional" when speaking about a gamer is just sickening and demeaning to *REAL* professionals like the programmers who coded the game or the Network engineers at the ISP who maintain connections so the _game_ can be played. Tournaments are great, but lets put things in perspective. If you win a ribbon at your local or even state fair for your chili, do you think that gives you the right to start putting yourself on the same level as a real professional such as Emril Lagasse?

    I love to spend a good 3 hours playing an online game, but in keeping touch with reality it's just a game. When I'm done thats it, I don't try to make it more than what it really is to compensate for a critical lacking in my life. Personally, I would not watch this sort of stuff online or in person with free admission, free food, and free beer. Strikes me kinda like watching golf...you have to be the right kind of person.

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)