Slashdot Mirror
Linux 2.6.0-test11 Kernel Released
An anonymous reader writes "Linus Torvalds has released his final 2.6.0-test kernel, calling it the 'Beaver In Detox'. Following this release, Linus says that 2.6 development will be led by Andrew Morton. The kernel's name refers in jest to the previous release, which Linus had named "Stoned Beaver". It contains a fix for the aic7xxx driver, proper error handling in do_fork(), some firewire fixes, and correction of a few skbuff leakage points. Download it from a kernel.org mirror."
proper error handling in do_fork()
So you could say the previous version was forked up?
Given the Gnu/Linux philosophy, 2.6.0 should be called Open Beaver.
Simon
Some may scoff at changing a release name to suit customers and corporate supporters, but it is a simple and useful thing to do.
I suggest the next release should go a step further. Something smooth, something that rolls off of the tongue, something like "Clean Shaven Beaver"
No word on a resolution for the problem with pre-empt, at least none that can be seen with a search for "preempt" in the page. :-P
Emacs: for people who just never know when to
On a side note, Linus "went on to note that he'll be too busy eating for the next few days to check his email." I know it's Thanksgiving and all, but no one eats a whole weekend away unless they're...
No way, dude! Far out! Linus has the munchies, man!
BSD is always dying, and now the Tux has hit rock bottom on sex and hard drugs?
Linux must be a fan of the Sex Pistols.
I just compiled test10!
Slacker. I've been running test10 for several day now.
No word on a resolution for the problem with pre-empt, at least none that can be seen with a search for "preempt" in the page. :-P
It's no wonder that the Linux Kernel development process isn't being taken seriously, what with the childish drug references and sexual innuendo being spouted. We need a wholesome, filth-free name to call the 2.6.0 release. I propose 'squeaky clean beaver'.
Wah!
Is it really necessary to have every test release on the front page?
Yes, as it happens, it is.
Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
Then run xconfig, make sure you've got console support compiled in (this point is key) and off you go. make, make install.
It's worth saying again, no matter how many times it's been said, that Linus and his band of merry coders are doing incredible work. On older machines, like my humble P2/266 laptop, a recompile actually feels faster, a lot faster in fact. If you're running older hardware, it's worth it to give these test kernels a try for that alone, if nothing else.
Mike Hoye
A full discussion of the pre-empt problem can be found here:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1679
This is probably what has been happening to me.
I tried up to -test9, but after a few (2-10) hours, my cpu and disk access would shoot up and RAM usage would slowly increase. I dropped to a tty, typed the username "root", but the cpu load was so hight that login timed out before I was even prompted for a password!
So I had to kill the power on my machine while I could hear that my disk was fully active. I was not a happy camper.
Expert in software patents or patent law? Contribute to the ESP wiki!
I was seriously planning a quiet night at home compiling test 9 right before I read this. I was going to stop at the store on the way and pick up a nice bottle of wine, one of those claim jumper tv dinners that feeds a small army, maybe some candles. release 11 - good grief, this changes everything. # times i have recompiled the kernel in the last week - 3 # times i have gotten busy with the girlfriend in the last week - 0
It looks like they are going to ship the kernel without the latest framebuffer things. Last time I made a non -mm kernel, the framebuffers were completely hosed, and I don't think the changes have been merged yet. Am I looney or correct on this?
You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
I thought you had to run Windows to use Front Page?
The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
Also check out this to see stats about the different 2.6.0-testX versions compile warnings and errors by John Cherry from the OSDL.
I agree. Announcing minor and test versions is only news worthy to the people that are following progress closely, who are likely to know about it anyway. And those people that don't follow it closely are only interested in hearing about major changes since the last time they checked up on a project.
... get back to you roots. Show me stuff that matters.
For example, the launch of Windows 2000 didn't even make a story on Slashdot when it launched in February 2000 even though a development kernel release did. I realize a large portion of Slashdot doesn't use Windows, but it's still significant news for every nerd.
C'mon Slashdot
Now _that's_ a smooth name that just rolls off the tongue... :)
You're so right.
I can take care of the business of compiling the kernel without distraction, now that they have machines that can 'do the work' for the GF.
There are even pay-per-view websites devoted to these things...
'Clean Shaven Beaver'
Looks like Tux has been replaced in Linus' heart. Thats Great! I've always prefered Beaver meat to Penguin. Plus, you can make the coolest hats out of Beaver pelts. Now we just need a name for the little fellow. How about Bux?
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
The reason that this made the front page is that it's the test release prior to the first "production" release of the 2.6 kernel which we have waited 2years + for. Seems only right that this should be on the homepage. Same as todays earlier story on FreeBSD 5.2.
The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
At least Linus didn't call it the "SCO, fuck your mama" build ;)
"I bow to no man" - Riddick
You wouldn't think so, but there is a good reason for it. To make a sweeping generalization, Slashdotters want to see Linux succeed, and we have the technical knowledge to compile kernels and make informative bug reports if needs be. Publishing this story on Slashdot will entice more people to test the new kernel, thus ensuring that the 2.6.0 release will be Bug-free(tm).
Litigious bastards
Remember how important audience is. While you and many other slashdotters might not care about test releases, still more probably do.
Open Beaver? Longhorn? could a merge be possible here?
# times i have recompiled the kernel in the last week - 3
;-)
# times i have gotten busy with the girlfriend in the last week - 0
Huh. How ironic is this.
Number of times I have recompiled the kernel in the last week - 0
Number of times I have gotten busy with your girlfriend in the last week - 3
Also, if you're at all unsure of the process used to develop the 2.6.0-testX kernel, there's a handy diagram here...
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
I think you need to reread the name:
Beaver In Detox
Now, let your mind slip a little bit further into the gutter, and I think you will see that he did name it what you said. It's just a little more thinly veiled.
I think his reason for making it vague was that SCO needs to have everything in the open to see things (think GPL code). By making it more vague, they are less likely to be in on the joke.
-- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
Indeed, unfortunately, this article is cluttered up with people saying slashdot != freshmeat (as usual), and lame beaver jokes.
I think there's one discussion about the pre-empt stuff being fubarred, but that's about it, kinda disappointing there aren't more people taking about the kernel itself. I'm still running test9 on my main box, was gonna compile test10 today, good thing I didn't, or else I'd be one of those ever popular "dang I just compiled version x - 1 an hour ago" people.
When you put 1 milion monkeys with keyboards in a room, open source occurs (taken from the Bazaar and the Cathedral), or a result of similar quality.
Since most open source development is not done by professionals nor professional organizations, there is no formal QA process. As such, Linux is in dire need of testing. Especially with all the unproven claims of stability made in its regard.
It is therefore very important that as wide a variety of people as possible download it and hose their systems so that bugs get reported in newsgroups where people will get laughed at for not reading every bit of manual out there.
I think that the people posting complaints about this story were either ignorant of the open source development process, or just trolling.
Thank you.
After these patches become mainstream, somebody could make an automated system to ask the user to describe the problem, then send a bug report with the oops, .config, dmesg, etc.
Litigious bastards
Unless one of the people working on the ACPI subsystem have your laptop, they have no way of knowing about the problem. So submit a bug report - if the fix is a one-liner, it might still go in.
Litigious bastards
why don't they just make the tests bigger and make the highest one 10?
My only need for scsi is for my venerable old hp scanjet 4 and a cd burner, so this ancient future domain isa card works just dandy.
Unfortunately, the driver segfaults under 2.6.0-x. It worked a treat with 2.4.
Anyone else had this issue? Should I make a formal bug report? Is it a hassle to do so?
Brak: What's THAT?
Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
I know several distros have their kernels heavily patched (e.g. RedHat). Does anyone know if there is a distro which leaves the kernel totally untouched? Or, perhaps RedHat and a few others are unique in their capacity to actually fiddle with it.
As usual, I set a torrent here.
"Res publica non dominetur"
In Gentoo you can 'emerge vanilla-sources' instead of 'gentoo-sources' for a plain-jane vanilla kernel. To work with developmental vanilla kernels you just 'emerge development-sources'.
If you're into manually tweaking kernels and packages I highly recommend Gentoo, you'll learn tons about Linux just by installing it.
"Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails