Slashdot Mirror


ISS Fender Bender

wjsteele writes "Seems that the Space Station has had a minor fender bender. Sounds kind of scary... being in a space craft and hearing metal crunching (like an aluminum can.) Apparently some 'Minor' space debris struck the station around 2:30am this morning, while the astronauts were eating their wheaties." Update: 11/27 16:31 GMT by M : Looks like an experiment may be to blame.

66 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. 2:30 AM, eh? by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Glad you included that, because times of day -- especially those lacking any sort of timezone information -- are extremely useful when referring to events that take place in space.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:2:30 AM, eh? by golan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the most logical timezone to apply in space, I believe, would be GMT, kind of standard.
      The military people use it when they talk about zulu time, right?, That would be common sense. But, maybe what people at NASA, ESA, or the russian agency think might the other way around!

    2. Re:2:30 AM, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would also explain why they were eating their wheaties at 2:30 am. 2:30gmt == 7:30 est.

    3. Re:2:30 AM, eh? by jfoust · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the Houston Chronicle, among other sources, the incident took place at 1:59 am CST (0759 GMT) Wednesday.

    4. Re:2:30 AM, eh? by Jon_MrJR · · Score: 2, Informative

      I bet it's UTC, that's the timezone NASA uses on this cute StationLocation website...

  2. False Alarm by thelizman · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was just the aluminum foil on the stations main antenna.

  3. Oh boy by EulerX07 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their insurance are gonna go up now, I hope they had comprehensive...

  4. Space Junk by Chatmag · · Score: 5, Informative

    A 1999 study estimated there are some 4 million pounds of space junk in low-Earth orbit, just one part of a celestial sea of roughly 110,000 objects larger than 1 centimeter -- each big enough to damage a satellite or space-based telescope.

    It's no wonder the ISS was hit. All they need is the space equivalent of the "adopt a highway" program, and a lot of plastic bags.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Space Junk by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or alternatively a chain gang inmates to pick up the trash in orbit...
      An then they say crime doesn't pay. I mean, rob a bank, hide the money, turn yourself in and get a free trip in space! No need for years of hard study and training!
    2. Re:Space Junk by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even on the Earth's surface, those objects would be pretty spread out. The surface area of a sphere varies by r^2 and stable orbits starts quite a distance away from the Earth. So I would be interested in hearing the exact probability of getting hit by something; I don't imagine it's all that big.

    3. Re:Space Junk by lgftsa · · Score: 2, Funny

      And secondly, what are Americons?

      I think they're a splinter group of Destructicons which had some philosophical differences with Megatron. They've been having some trouble with Terrorcons lately.

  5. Minor? by KingDaveRa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Minor? If I was floating about in space in something with walls as thick as a tin can, I would be rather worried by now.

    According to This article on BBC News Michael Foale is no stranger to this: "He was onboard the Mir space station in 1987 when a Progress supply tanker crashed into it - one of the most dangerous incidents to have ever taken place in space."

    I'd still be crapping my pants though. There's no jumping off this one.

    1. Re:Minor? by Psiren · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's no jumping off this one.

      Sure there is. It's just a long way down... ;)

    2. Re:Minor? by MouseR · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's no jumping off this one.

      Actually, yes there is.

      The ISS has a permanently docked Soyuz capsule for evacuation purposes.

      Some details, here, also indicate that the incident you mention actually took place in 1997.

      NASA also have info on the escape capsule.

    3. Re:Minor? by s20451 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most spacecraft that fly in and out of the Earth's atmosphere have thick skins, to endure the stresses of launch and re-entry. Spacecraft that are solely designed to travel in the vacuum of space tend to be quite thin-skinned to save weight.

      For example, the Apollo lunar module had a skin about the thickness of a pop can. Apparently the hatch would bulge outward when the module was pressurized -- I wish I could find a reference for that. There is also a story of a technician on the ground who clicked his pen against a high-pressue LM fuel tank during testing -- the click opened a pin-prick leak that amputated the technician's finger (that story is in "Apollo" by Murray and Cox).

      The ISS was specifically designed to withstand impacts from space debris, so I would expect its hull to be a little thicker.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    4. Re:Minor? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
      According to This article on BBC News Michael Foale is no stranger to this: "He was onboard the Mir space station in 1987 when a Progress supply tanker crashed into it - one of the most dangerous incidents to have ever taken place in space."
      I've just finished reading Dragonfly, a book all about the incident you mention. Summarising: A manual docking system wasn't nearly up to the task of docking a Progress, and because of frequent system failures, the Russians bring them in fast and break hard. They'd had to turn off radar telemetry because it was interfering with a video signal from the Progress. The Progress hit the station, punching a postage-stamp sized hole in one section and damaging a solar array. The crew were able to seal off affected section, but only after effectively crippling the station because they had to unplug all the cables going through a doorway.

      This was shortly after a near miss of another Progress, a fire in one of the oxygen generators and a bunch of other system failures. The Russians more or less took it in their stride. The Americans, less so.

      If anyone is interested in these events, dig out the book. I don't have time to find an Amazon link at the moment -- will post one if no one beats me to it.

  6. A "brush"? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't things as small as paing flecks cause serious damage at the kind of speeds space junk goes at?

    I realise the junk might share the same orbit as the space station and have the same relative velocity blah blah, but consider just how slow it'd have to be moving not to rupture the hull.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:A "brush"? by s20451 · · Score: 3, Informative

      but don't things as small as paing flecks cause serious damage at the kind of speeds space junk goes at?

      I assume you mean "paint flecks", and the answer is that they may cause minor damage. The space shuttle Challenger took a paint fleck hit on one of its windows, which left a crater about a quarter inch in diameter. Apparently such minor pitting on the thermal tiles is considered routine in the shuttle program.

      Even at orbital speeds, paint flecks don't have enough momentum to worry about. The big worry is the ball-bearing-sized debris, which is essentially impossible to detect, and which could deliver the impact energy of a hand grenade explosion.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:A "brush"? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, the station is also moving at high speeds around the earth. If it moves in the same direction as the debris, they can move side by side without harm (or at least you don't get collisions in the km/s range).

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  7. Oh, I know what this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Micheal Foale's got one of those sound effect key fobs.

    Instead of the usual Grenade Launcher, Bazooka, Machine Gun noises, the new space version comes with 'crunching metal tin', 'airlock hiss' and 'oops, we lost a solar panel' noises...

    Nice one Michael!

    1. Re:Oh, I know what this is... by pipingguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Homer: Boy, I know you're going to like your present.

      [it's a hand-held gizmo with three buttons, Bart presses each button a few times]

      Toy: Shut up! Shut up! Kiss my butt! Shut up! Go to hell! Go to hell!

      Bart: Dad, I promise you, I will never get tired of this.

  8. 30,000 km/s can do a lot of damage by asciimonster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recall an insident with a space shuttle a few years ago. A flick of paint hit a window and left a fist-sized star in that window. That's the danger of space 30,000 km/s isn't a big deal in space, but having a collision at that speed is quite an impact.

    So anyone who still think the movie Armageddon is based on scientific facts. (Remember the body being flung againt the windscreen and it didn't even have a scratch?) Think again...

    1. Re:30,000 km/s can do a lot of damage by asciimonster · · Score: 3
      Here are some links that might be interesting in this respect:

      High Speed Collisions
      Debris and Furture Space Activities

    2. Re:30,000 km/s can do a lot of damage by Seahawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that the body in Armageddon didnt move with 30000 km/h compared to the shuttle, as it had fallen out of a spaceship with the same speed and direction of the first craft

    3. Re:30,000 km/s can do a lot of damage by myom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anything hitting the space station at that speed (1/10 the speed of light) would cause enormous damage. Did you mean 30 000km/h?

    4. Re:30,000 km/s can do a lot of damage by Stween · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That body could never have hit the second shuttle in the first place. It has the same speed as the first shuttle, and since there is no atmosphere to slow him down, it should float alongside it."

      If memory serves from the movie, there was an awful lot of stuff floating around on the approach to the asteroid that could have slowed the body down quicker than a shuttle. A couple of strikes from those basketball-sized stones you mention could easily have kicked the body back a little.

      That said, there's little point trying to analyse a movie that's clearly not intended to be scientifically accurate.

    5. Re:30,000 km/s can do a lot of damage by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that you could see. with detail, the body coming pretty much meant that the relative speed differential wasn't 30,000km/s. Or even 30,000km/h. Or even 300km/h. Ever seen a car drive towards you at 300km/h? Even without flalling arms, even with sharp, slick edges, its more blurry than that body was.

      Just because something is in space doesn't mean that its relative speed to you is instantly 1/10 the speed of light - you realize that you're just one zero away, right? Additionally, just because you're in space and you hit something, doesn't mean your relative speed was all that high. I mean, if your relative speed is 1m/h different, and you're only 1m away...well, in 1h, you'll hit it.

      Has no one heard of relativity here?

  9. Doesnt seem right to me by hookedup · · Score: 3, Interesting


    The spokesman, who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity, said by telephone that the space forces had detected an object along the station's orbit. They determined that the object was very small and would pose no danger to the craft.

    Shouldnt they at the very least notify the crew to inform them of the junk nearby? And possibly practice a drill for this sort of thing.

    Seems to me they lucked out this time, if that had been a bigger piece of junk which would cause major damage, and had ground control had seen it and not said anything, we would have plenty of different headlines this morning.

  10. Fender Bender ? by mbone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is one of the weirdest things I have heard of -
    - Both astronauts heard it
    - By this point they should be pretty familar with the noises the station makes - for example, the thermal expansion / contraction as you go through the terminator.
    - It did not sound like an explosion (typical velocities of space debris impacts is 5 kilometers per second or so - and meteorites impact at even higher velocities), so it probably wasn't a piece of random junk.
    - They got out the mobile camera and couldn't see anything damaged.

    So what was it ? Let's hope it wasn't some valve or other part failing, but I suspect we will hear more of this.

    1. Re:Fender Bender ? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously it has to be aliens doing knock-and-run.

  11. A simplier explanation by doktorstop · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Russian Space Agency has just issued a simplier explanation. They've been trying to figure out what happened and came out with a different idea. No debris have hit the station. The sound was internal, coming from something that jammed a fan in the internal air ventilation system. This also has been confirmed by specialists from RosAviaKosmos (the company that built IIS =) Sorry, folks, the Mars attack theory will have to wait till next time =)

    --
    http://www.automatiq.se
    1. Re:A simplier explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a face spider crawling through those pipes. Nothing to worry about folks.

      At least until astronauts return to Earth...

      *creepy music*

  12. Re:Anyone know... by gowen · · Score: 4, Informative
    What time zone the ISS runs in?
    According to Ed Lu's letters home they work on Greenwich Mean Time.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  13. Re:Sound in space? by Stween · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I did'nt think sound travelled in space."

    That's true. The sound didn't travel through space, the sound travelled through the body of the space station and the air contained within it, not the vacuum of space.

  14. FLOATING space junk? by localroger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Space junk does not "float," it zips along at seven miles per second. Any piece of space junk big enough to see would have completely destroyed at least one module of the ISS. Even if the space junk was in "almost" the same orbit as ISS (say, detached from the ISS itself previously) it would be going fast enough to do a hell of a lot of damage.

    I don't have any idea what could have caused this, but it wasn't something randomly floating around that just bumped the station. What disturbs me more than the accident itself is that professionals who should know better are floating this idea that it might be like a shopping cart hitting your car. It makes no sense at all.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:FLOATING space junk? by andrewscraig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you have to think relative. Relative to the speed of the space station, a piece of space junk "almost" in the same orbit as ISS is going "almost" the same speed as the ISS (unless one is being propelled by something). That's why it can just rub against the station without actually causing any damage.

    2. Re:FLOATING space junk? by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are two extreme cases, and a lot of intermediates.

      The orbital radius determines the tangential velocity of an orbiting object, but it doesn't determine its direction. You have to take the angle between the two velocity vectors into account in calculating the relative velocity.

      In this case, assume r is the same. If both velocities have the same direction, then relative velocity is zero. If they're on the opposite direction, then the relative velocity is twice the original. For any other cases you'll need to grab a calculator and prey to the cos() or sin() functions.

  15. You knew it was coming! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anybody else read the title and think "Bite my shiny metal space station ass?"

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  16. Re:Sound in space? by snipingkills · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sound doesn't travel in a vacuum due to a lack of matter to vibrate through. If something impacted the hull the sound waves would be transmitted through the hull and through the atmosphere inside the space station.

  17. Some serious analysis required by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The scene... a silently rusting space station, somewhere in near Earth orbit.

    "Honey,..."

    "Yeah?"

    "... I think I crashed the space station"

    "WHAT?!!"

    "Look, it wasn't my fault. Some space junk came out without stopping and I ran right into it!"

    "Honey, baby, how often have I told you, DON'T DRIVE MY SPACE STATION. Sorry, I got a little emotional there."

    "We're insured, aren't we?"

    "Not over international territory. Right now we're about over Afghanistan. No coverage."

    "I'm so sorry, I'll make it right..."

    "OK, suit up, we're going out"

    "No, I meant I'll bake some cookies"

    "OK, get me a beer while you're at it."

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  18. Re:Would that not be UCT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    UTC == GMT

  19. I'll thank you by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to refer to my secret orbiting battle station from which I intend to launch my bid for world domination as 'debris'

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  20. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't reply to Anonymous Cowards

    Right...

  21. For the space newbies by suds · · Score: 4, Funny

    Space junk, half the size of the little finger nail has hit the International Space Station (of size approximately 20 VW beetles) today morning at 2.30am precisely. The junk was moving at a 1000 times the speed of a jumbo jet, and if hit head on could create a crater 0.0034 times the size of Philadelphia.

  22. Why didn't they just... by riggwelter · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...raise shields?!

    --
    Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
    1. Re:Why didn't they just... by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, in this day and age you just polarise the hull plating

  23. Later on that day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they discover that a six pack of beer has been stowed away in the bathroom. And one can is missing...

  24. Filmmaker David Cronenberg Arrested In Space by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION -- Canadian filmmaker David Cronenberg was arrested today over 700 miles above the Earth's surface when he was found filming scenes for a sequel to his controversial film, Crash, a movie about sexual attraction to car crashes.

    Cronenberg, who had not obtained permission to film from the American or Russian space agencies, was found outside the International Space Station by astronauts after they were awoken by what sounded like "a car being crashed". Upon investigation, the astronauts found Cronenberg discussing the result of a take with actor Elias Koteas and giving direction for the next.

    "I can't believe he did this," said cosmonaut Alexander Kaleri from the space station. "This is not a movie studio."

    The arrest comes only six months after Cronenberg announced that he was entering the X-Prize Contest, which promises an award of $10,000,000 US to the first privately-owned reusable spacecraft. Outside of a few die-hard fans of the director's work, no one had taken Cronenberg's entrace seriously.

    "This really fucks things up for me," said John Carmack, the odds-on favourite in the contest. "If he posts bail and gets back up in space, then he wins the prize. I never knew he was this far ahead."

    Cronenberg is being held in a washroom on the International Space Station pending a routine Soyuz supply flight. Sources at NASA say that it's possible he could be formally booked and bail set within as little as six days, giving him plenty of time to fulfill the X-Prize conditions.

    Open-source programmer Richard Stallman could not be reached for comment, but sources close to the computing guru said he had been collaborating with Cronenberg for some time. "He was one of the paramedics in the first Crash," said a friend. "I think Cronenberg's making him a meteorite or something in this one."

  25. Re:MicroMetoriets by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe that even the shuttle is able to cope with a hole in the hull close to an inch across long enough to do an emergency re-entry (of course if it's in the wrong part of the hull it's Columbia time again). So an ISS crew shouldn't have too big a problem with small meteorites, even if they had to seal off one module... the idea that all your air will leak out in seconds through a small hole is pure Hollywood.

  26. It wasn't hit by anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    BBC News now says that it wasn't hit by an external object and that the noice came from an internal instrument.

  27. Video footage from external cameras reveals... by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

    '... a vaguely humanoid yet strangely reflective skinned figure placing a satellite dish and assorted space station parts into his torso before flying away in a strange shaped craft. Sound cleanup of the noise has revealed the mysterious but still slightly distorted message '.ou ca... bit... my shiny... etal... ass' Could this be the first evidence of an alien intelligence in the universe.?'

  28. Does this remind anyone of "Chernobyl"? by geoswan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The article talks about the different attitudes towards safety the two space agencies have...

    The Russians consider themselves less rigid and more inventive than the Americans, who tend to follow every letter in the technical manuals, said Sergei Gorbunov, a spokesman for the Russian Space Agency.

    Isn't this what caused the Chernobyl meltdown? IIRC, the technical staff were being inventive and improvising around some safety tests.

  29. Is it making a comeback? by tgeerts · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope they did not spill any Tang.

  30. Eating breakfast at 2:30am? by smart.id · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This brings me to wonder... what time system and time zone (if any) do the astronauts use?

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
  31. Gender Bender ? by ciryon · · Score: 2, Funny
    Perhaps it was the Gender Bender ?

    Ciryon

  32. Re:Moving orbit by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    space debris' orbitals are pretty easily predictable, why not shoot them out of orbit with a projectile?

    Because the idea is to have less crap floating around in Earth orbit, not more. If the collision between one of your projectiles and its target is of sufficient force, the debris will become a scattered cloud of fragments. Something the size of the fingernail on your pinky put a crater into the windshield of one of the shuttles, do we really want a cloud of them up there?

    The laser beam idea might be feasible, but then again, maybe not. SDI turned out to be a lot harder to create than everyone thought, and that dealt with large moving objects traveling predictable paths. Plus you've got to worry about something that you don't want to hit being in the line of fire, which is slightly less of a concern when what you want to hit are nuclear warheads heading for your cities.

    Call me crazy, but I think the idea of a few autonomous space trash trucks cruising around up there and picking up errant junk seems like the way to go, once technology has advanced sufficiently to permit it.

    ~Philly

  33. The Space Station was NOT Struck by SparafucileMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nothing actually hit the space station, and everything is fine. See here, here, here, or just skip them all and see Google.

  34. Actually, it WAS a false alarm. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Informative
  35. source of noise found by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative
  36. Fender bender? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I didn't know space stations have fenders. That is about as dumb as putting wings on a space ship. Wait... Nevermind.

  37. When I first saw that headline... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought it said IIS fender bender. I was trying to figure out why the space station was running IIS, and figured this was another microsoft-bashing article.

  38. Need the info... by daveking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless you know what time standard is used on the space station, the assertion that something happened to the space station at 2:30am this morning only gives you the approximate position of the space station relative to the earth and sun during the event. You can't deduce the longitude or Earth surface local time from it, because the space station will have had that relative position multiple times on any given morning.

    So how do they handle time out there? I'll bet it involves the word 'Zulu' because that sounds really cool over the radio in movies.

    This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error.

    --
    ------DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE------
  39. GMT explained by GoneGaryT · · Score: 2, Informative
    UTC == GMT == BST - daylight_savings, so far as I am aware.

    Greenwich Mean Time is called Mean because it is the time averaged over a year, if you get the idea. It isn't the real time on account of the 3 degrees or so of wobble of the earth on its axis. The block where I live is pretty much bang on geographical North - South, so shadows around midday can be observed over time. The midday alignment can vary by as much as 12 minutes from 'clock' time, in advance or retarded depending on the season.

    And now the sums: 12 mins = (hrs in day x mins in hr) x (3 degrees/360 degrees), or (24*60)*(3/360).

    Someone correct me if this is bollocks.

  40. Let's get the facts straight by xihr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All they heard on the ISS was a noise. Checks for external damage haven't found anything yet. Surely you hear hear the occasional weird noise in your apartment/house; that doesn't mean it was hit by a meteor, does it?

  41. Acoustic location by ipsender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Surely the astonishing finding is that there would appear to be no on-board vibration (sound) sensor array networked to a computer which could accurately determine the source and probable nature of the disturbance. Or does that feature come with v2.0?

  42. Re:Would that not be UCT by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Informative