Slashdot Mirror


Phoenix Sounds Death Knell for BIOS

Anonymous Coward writes "The sky will fall next.... Betanews is carrying a story about Phoenix ditching the trusty old BIOS and moving to 'Trusted Computing'... ya right... Time to stock up on those old motherboards boys!" A follow-up/analysis on this story.

25 of 658 comments (clear)

  1. Or, buy a Mac... by EvilStein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or buy a motherboard with a BIOS that doesn't come from Phoenix.
    Last time I checked, Phoenix wasn't the only company on Earth that made motherboard BIOS setups.

    I'm sure that something else will pop up.
    Or, another idea.. write/call/visit Phoenix and tell them that you think their idea sucks. Give their 1-800 # a call. Vote with your wallet, as usual.

    1. Re:Or, buy a Mac... by UltraSkuzzi · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's the problem, there won't really be any alternative, AMI has jumped on board too. Phoenix IS Award so there goes another competitior. The only ones left will be the big giant OEMs, like Compaq, and IBM who last I checked, still made their own BIOS.

      --

      ~UltraSkuzzi
      This comment is liscensed by SCO.
    2. Re:Or, buy a Mac... by ultranova · · Score: 5, Funny

      Assuming that it will continue be legal to make motherboards without DRM. After all, only a music-sharing communist hippie open-source fundamentalist copyright-infringing file-sharer would want them.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:Or, buy a Mac... by Nikkos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Why? Because Microsoft has declared that thir next operating system will only run on Trusted Computing hardware and it is flat-out IMPOSSIBLE to sell hardware if it can't run Windows."

      This is stupid. If no motherboards adopted trusting computing, it'd be fucking hard to sell Windows.

    4. Re:Or, buy a Mac... by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Which is just to say that we should support open firmware. It is hackable in forth, a language that one can learn in a week or two, if you do not already know it.

      Perhaps someone will tell us what the benefits of the randomly-changeable bios are.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Or, buy a Mac... by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And if my mother had wings, she could fly. Any MB maker that ignores Windows compatibility does so at its peril. Let's say all the manufacturers banded together and refused to do TC. You can bet somebody would seize the market opportunity that this would present, and the anti TC consortium would sink faster than the Titanic.

      Face it, Microsoft dictates what desktop hardware looks like. This is not a good thing, but it's not an easy thing to change.

  2. LinuxBIOS by Howard+Beale · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How will LinuxBIOS fit into this? Will we be able to pop out a Phoenix BIOS and pop a LinuxBIOS into it?

  3. If they hadn't invented that, someone else would by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    If all goes according to plan, a new product the company dubs Core System Software (CSS) will serve as the foundation of PC architecture.

    DeCSS anyone?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. Re:Trust Me. by ultranova · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Since when does it make sense to switch the onus for security to hardware?

    Never, unless of course you meant security for anyone except the computers owner. Then it makes plenty of sense to make the computer a remote-controlled slave terminal...

    I wonder if the "trusted" version of Windows will be running programs for third parties, for whom Microsoft has sold their users CPU cycles ? After all, there's allready projects paying for computer time, and DRM would make this secure (impossible forge results). Why let users profit, when one can use them to profit Corporation ?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  5. brockman by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new trusted computing BIOS overlords...

  6. OpenBIOS by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is also OpenBIOS, an open source 'BIOS' based on OpenFirmware. OpenFirmware is the solution used on Sun, IBM and Apple based machines. OpenFirmware uses a forth interpreter and also presents the hardware as a device tree.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  7. Re:LinuxBIOS by Kirill+Lokshin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The new BIOS would be rather pointless if it were easy to remove, since Phoenix wouldn't be able to (a) protect against viruses and (b) lock in users.

    I see two different ways Phoenix could go about doing this. Either all BIOS changes will come from official sources and be signed by Phoenix (with the sigs checked in hardware), or the BIOS will be completely static, and users will be forced to buy a new mobo whenever something major changes.

    Either way, I don't think you will be able to buy a board with Phoenix preloaded and just wipe it off.

  8. "Intrinsic security", eh? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When will this industry ever learn that there's no such thing as a magic bullet? Let's see, just off the top of my head, there was OOP, not to mention Extreme Programming, and now the apparent holy grail of security, "Trusted Computing".

    Well, guess what, writing high quality software is hard. Writing high quality, secure software is *really* hard. And there's nothing that will change that.

    1. Re:"Intrinsic security", eh? by jcknox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When will the consumers learn that the reason we're being given for buying something is not always the reason it's being sold the way it is?

      Microsoft has sold the last several versions of all of its products by telling us how much more we could do with them. Truthfully, they were primarily produced to pack more cash into the MS vaults.

      Can't you hear the product development guys? They're not saying "let's put together this new trusted computing thing to make computers more secure." They're saying "let's put together a system to lock users into our stuff and get Pheonix et al to make hardware that locks out Linux. We'll call it 'trusted computing' and sell it by telling everyone it will make things more secure."

      3 steps:

      1. Make the product that helps your business

      2. Tell the consumers it will help their business

      3. Profit.

      This one really works.

  9. Re:Hmmm by Stinky+Glen20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, so you, me and 10,000 other geeks will buy non-trusted computing motherboards. Meanwhile, Joe Sixpack and all his buddies ignorantly purchase millions of the "trusted" and "safe" offering.

  10. The sky isn't falling. The sky HAS Fallen. by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can hardly imagine whatever "trusted computing" consortium allowing Open Source operating systems to have the specs to their protocols [after all, "security through obscurity" seems to be the favored method of both microsoft and the anti-virus industry].

    Without those specifications, the routers will reject packets from Linux and BSD computers (because they will be seen by the routers as being infected because they cannot give the expected response) and therefore only 'approved' (read: microsoft, and perhaps -perhaps- apple) operating systems will have access to the internet.

    And now, with the access to the hardware cut off by "trusted computing"'s subsitution for the bios; open source operating systems won't even be able to write to the computer hardware itself.

    (my ex-gf pointed out that someone can crack that the way the xbox was cracked, but that is not taking the DMCA into account, which would prevent any 'respectable' projects from being able to use any code generated illegally).

    To top things off, the final piece of the puzzle may be the fact that europe is on the verge of adopting 'software patents', which gives Microsoft the foot in the door to sue anyone who designs a half-way decent GUI into obscurity...and this will be coming soon to a formerly free democratic republic near you.

    In short, Open Source computing is a concept whose day has come and now has gone, and it's time to either get back to chasing 'warez' or give up on computers entirely.

    Unless there's something I'm missing here. But after reading slashdot for the last three or four years, I really doubt that there is.

    1. Re:The sky isn't falling. The sky HAS Fallen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would not be so pesimistic. We are witnessing the birth of a more fundamental split in computing than the old OSS/Proprietry , Unix/Windows dichotomy.

      In a few years we will have 2 well established 'streams' of computing.

      The first will be 'consumer' computers. Largely owned by fairly well off, but technically naive westerners in the US and Europe,this stream of computing will be Microsoft based, include DMCA and trusted computing models. It will be a very one way, consumer broadcast model allowing those who have money and no sense about their privacy to be pampered with choice, watch DVD movies and whatever other Hollywood rubbish they want piped straight from AOL/Time/Warner/Microsoft HQ.

      There will remain a growing second stream of computing. Largely comprised of businesses, programmers, geeks, military, government and health organisations, and for the most part the other 70-80 % of the worlds people who live in poorer conditions. Such users have no use for 'consumer' code. It will either be stripped out (regardless of any legal impedements - be realistic) or will come from manufacturers in China and the East where the freaks in Washington will be powerless to interfere in the economics of demand.

      Users of each class of computing will be very different in lifestyle and psychology. The former consumers only receive and pay money.

      The latter group are producers, or 'participants in the world' as I like to call them.

      Eventually these streams will be entirely incompatible, consumer computing will become more like TV.

      Eventually the former 'consumer' hardware will not even be considerd 'COMPUTERS' , being so crippled and controlled as not to function as general purpose computing devices (as Turing would have it).

      Eventually the former class of devices will die out as society changes from a mindless consumer mentality to an active population (or dies out itself, as a matter of deductive logic eitherway the consumer technolgy dies)

      Computers fit a particular definition - they are general purpose ordination devices - make them any less capable and they are no longer computers and cannot be sold as such.

  11. Re:Confusing? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know we are running out of acronyms but there should still be a few million letter combinations left.

    Such as SuX, POS or FUBAR ?
    No, to describe that new bios, they were all taken ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  12. Submit to Trusted Computing or be DENIED internet! by Alsee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Customers using Cisco's network admission control system can permit network access only to compliant and trusted endpoint devices (for example, PCs, servers, personal digital assistants) and restrict the access of non-compliant devices.

    ISP's can install these new Cisco routers and you will be denied internet access unless you submit to Trusted Computing.

    The routers are advertized as fighting "viruses", but they do not in fact scan for or block viruses. What they do is first check if you are running Trusted Computing. If not they deny you a connection. They can then be configured to verify that you are running specific software such as up to date anti-virus software.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  13. Re:Trust Me. by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not run a PC without a BIOS.... it is little needed these days... Any why not email M$ your own devised EULA for them to run Windows (TM(R)(C)etc) on your hardware????

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  14. CSS? by jimmer63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If all goes according to plan, a new product the company dubs Core System Software (CSS) will serve as the foundation of PC architecture.

    When will we have DeCSS?

  15. Re:Trust Me. by vangilder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would argue the opposite. Look at the iPod. It's not obvious how to copy music to multiple song libraries, but it's not overly difficult either. Apple tends to place much more responsibility onto the end user. Even the iTunes Music Store follows this philosophy. The AAC's themselves are restricted to a certain number of authorized computers, but you can burn them to unlimited CDs. I feel that this strategy will continue with their hardware-some restrictions, but with most of the "trust" in trusted computing being placed in the users themselves.

  16. Re:Hmmm by shaitand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And Joe sixpack and his friends are too lazy to do anything about it and too stupid to know what to do if they weren't. Joe sixpack and his friends have been having their noses rubbed in shit by our wonderful and pure democratic government and perfect serene friendly capitalism bread and butter spawned corporations for generations. They've always just rolled over and begged before... what makes you think that's going to change now?

    For hundreds of years joe sixpack and his friends have gotten weaker and weaker. The big recognizable first piece was centralized citizenship after the civil war, prior to that the only citizens of the USA lived in washington, everybody else was a citizen of their state which in turn was a member of the union.

    Next came the military, the constitution set up a division of powers, the central government was not supposed to have a standing army, that was supposed to be left to the states, while the central government maintained the navy. This wasn't random, it gave the states themselves the greatest power in domestic defense and limited the central government to only the direct military power to counter foreign foes (of course the militia's could be rallied). The air force was of course not covered in the Constitution. If you pay attention you'll notice the central government makes sure they are covered if this falls through, the navy is still the most highly funded of the forces, having within it all 3 types of armed forces. The Marines for instance are really just a subset of the Navy. The Navy's air power and number of craft are almost as extensive as the air force itself. And I guess it goes without saying, the navy of course has a navy ;)

    Now after centralizing authority and military power the government then started disarming the citizens. Deciding to do no more than pay lip service to the 2nd amendment (after all the government certainly doesn't feel people might need arms to overthrow it like the forefathers who had to do just that did when they put it in!). Now guns are being taken away, the classes of arms available to citizens has been reduced and reduced, arms are VERY closely watched by our police state.

    Since these things became stronger, than the last significant threat (assault riffles) has been removed from citizens hands, the government has proceeded to clench down. Showing it's force in foreign countries (iraq for instance), using "Terrorism" which was likely at least inadvertantly funded by our own CIA as an excuse to give federal agents more and more authority to lock down and control the population.

    Now to ensure Joe sixpack complies with all this they have been brainwashing him in school. School curriculum's are of course regulated by the state. They have to be in accordance with state tests, if you've noticed the state regulations tend to be most specific in matters of US History, where the government makes sure that text books and tests teach the materials in it's own interpretation of history. The interpretation that paints a picture of country being oppressed and fighting the good fight for independence. Supporting the common man etc etc etc. Rather than the truth, a bunch of rich men, did not like paying taxes and did not like the fact that england had given trade monopolies to rich men in england instead of them. Well over 80% of the population were loyal to the crown, more than that before war happened an innocents were caught in the crossfire. The enlistments in that war and pretty much every patriotic cause thereafter have been founded on a grain of truth buried in a stack of propoganda.

    Our government lies to us and herds of us like sheep. It teaches us a revised history in school. It teaches conformity in school. Picture our children being stamped one by one in a great convoluted Jello mold. It convinces us to give up our liberties one piece at a time. It okay to whine about one piece or another, but it happens so often on such a regular basis nowdays we hardly remember what

  17. Phoenix PR addy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    megan@Outcastpr.com

    Interestingly they outsource their PR.

    Above is the address of Megan Kurtz who is their public relations person. Get mailing now :)

  18. Re:Trust Me. by Rick.C · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let's all repeat in unison:

    "'Trustworthy computing' means that Microsoft can trust that we didn't hack our (their) system. It doesn't mean that we can trust Microsoft."

    Keep saying it until it makes sense.
    --
    You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
    "Math in a song is good."-Linford